Books / Ancient And Oriental Music Egon Wellesz

1. Ancient And Oriental Music Egon Wellesz

Page 1

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY

CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL

LIBRARY

Call No. 780.9 N.O.H.M.

D.G.A. 79.

Page 2

12.50-4

Govt. of India

Archaeological

Survey

of

India

Central

Archaeological

Library

NEW

DELHI

Acc. No.

65.401

Page 4

NEW

OXFORD

HISTORY

OF

MUSIC

VOLUME

I

Page 5

EDITORIAL BOARD

J. A. WESTRUP (Chairman)

GERALD ABRAHAM (Secretary)

EDWARD J. DENT

DOM ANSELM HUGHES

EGON WELLESZ

THE VOLUMES OF THE

NEW OXFORD HISTORY OF MUSIC

I. Ancient and Oriental Music

II. Early Medieval Music up to 1300

III. Ars Nova and the Renaissance (c. 1300–1540)

IV. The Age of Humanism (1540–1630)

V. Opera and Church Music (1630–1750)

VI. The Growth of Instrumental Music (1630–1750)

VII. The Symphonic Outlook (1745–1790)

VIII. The Age of Beethoven (1790–1830)

IX. Romanticism (1830–1890)

X. Modern Music (1890–1950)

XI. Chronological Tables and General Index

Page 7

K KRISHNA PLAYING A FLUTE

Relief from a temple at Belūr (Deccan). Hoysala Dynasty, 12th century

Page 8

ANCIENT AND

ORIENTAL MUSIC

EDITED BY

EGON WELLESZ

16.79

780.9

N.O.H.M.

LONDON

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

NEW YORK TORONTO

1957

Page 9

Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E.C.4

GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON

BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI

CAPE TOWN IBADAN NAIROBI ACCRA SINGAPORE

CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL

LIBRARY, NEW DELHI.

Acc. No. 16178.

Date 19/1/59.

Call No 780.9/N.o.H.M.

PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN

Page 10

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The present work is designed to replace the Oxford History of Music, first published in six volumes under the general editorship of Sir Henry Hadow between 1901 and 1905. Five authors contributed to that ambitious publication—the first of its kind to appear in English. The first two volumes, dealing with the Middle Ages and the sixteenth century, were the work of H. E. Wooldridge. In the third Sir Hubert Parry examined the music of the seventeenth century. The fourth, by J. A. Fuller Maitland, was devoted to the age of Bach and Handel; the fifth, by Hadow himself, to the period bounded by C. P. E. Bach and Schubert. In the final volume Edward Dannreuther discussed the Romantic period, with which, in the editor's words, it was ‘thought advisable to stop’. The importance of the work—particularly of the first two volumes—was widely recognized, and it became an indispensable part of a musician's library. The scheme was further extended in the new edition issued under the editorship of Sir Percy Buck between 1929 and 1938. An introductory volume, the work of several hands, was designed to supplement the story of music in the ancient world and the Middle Ages. New material, including two complete chapters, was added to volumes i and ii, while the third volume was reissued with minor corrections and a number of supplementary notes by Edward J. Dent. The history was also brought nearer to the twentieth century by the addition of a seventh volume, by H. C. Colles, entitled Symphony and Drama, 1850–1900.

Revision of an historical work is always difficult. If it is to be fully effective, it may well involve changes so comprehensive that very little of the original remains. Such radical revision was not the purpose of the second edition of the Oxford History of Music. To have attempted it in a third edition would have been impossible. During the first half of the present century an enormous amount of detailed work has been done on every period covered by the original volumes. New materials have been discovered, new relationships revealed, new interpretations made possible. Perhaps the most valuable achievement has been the publication in reliable modern editions of a mass of music which was previously available only in manuscript or in rare printed copies. These developments have immeasurably increased the historian's opportunities, but they have also added heavily to his responsibilities. To attempt a detailed survey of the whole history of

Page 11

vi

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

music is no longer within the power of a single writer. It may even

be doubted whether the burden can be adequately shouldered by a

team of five.

The New Oxford History of Music is therefore not a revision of

the older work, nor is it the product of a small group of writers. It

has been planned as an entirely new survey of music from the earliest

times down to comparatively recent years, including not only the

achievements of the Western world but also the contributions made

by eastern civilizations and primitive societies. The examination of

this immense field is the work of a large number of contributors,

English and foreign. The attempt has been made to achieve uniform-

ity without any loss of individuality. If this attempt has been success-

ful, the result is due largely to the patience and co-operation shown by

the contributors themselves. Overlapping has to some extent been

avoided by the use of frequent cross-references; but we have not

thought it proper to prevent different authors from expressing dif-

ferent views about the same subject, where it could legitimately be

regarded as falling into more than one category.

The scope of the work is sufficiently indicated by the titles of the

several volumes. Our object throughout has been to present music

not as an isolated phenomenon or the work of a few outstanding

composers, but as an art developing in constant association with

every form of human culture and activity. The biographies of indivi-

duals are therefore merely incidental to the main plan of the history,

and those who want detailed information of this kind must seek it

elsewhere. No hard and fast system of division into chapters has been

attempted. The treatment is sometimes by forms, sometimes by

periods, sometimes also by countries, according to the importance

which one element or another may assume. The division into volumes

has to some extent been determined by practical considerations; but

pains have been taken to ensure that the breaks occur at points which

are logically and historically justifiable. The result may be that the

work of a single composer who lived to a ripe age is divided be-

tween two volumes. The later operas of Monteverdi, for example,

belong to the history of Venetian opera and hence find their natural

place in volume v, not with the discussion of his earlier operas to be

found in volume iv. On the other hand, we have not insisted on a

rigid chronological division where the result would be illogical or

confusing. If a subject finds its natural conclusion some ten years

after the date assigned for the end of a period, it is obviously prefer-

able to complete it within the limits of one volume rather than to

Page 12

allow it to overflow into a second. An exception to the general

scheme of continuous chronology is to be found in volumes v and

vi, which deal with different aspects of the same period and so are

complementary to each other.

The history as a whole is intended to be useful to the professed

student of music, for whom the documentation of sources and the

bibliographies are particularly designed. But the growing interest in

the music of all periods shown by music-lovers in general has encour-

aged us to bear their interests also in mind. It is inevitable that a

work of this kind should employ a large number of technical terms

and deal with highly specialized matters. We have, however, tried to

ensure that the technical terms are intelligible to the ordinary reader

and that what is specialized is not necessarily wrapped in obscurity.

Finally, since music must be heard to be fully appreciated, we have

given references throughout to the records issued by His Master's

Voice (R. C. A. Victor) under the general title The History of Music

in Sound. These records are collected in a series of albums which

correspond to the volumes of the present work, and have been

designed to be used with it.

J. A. WESTRUP

GERALD ABRAHAM

EDWARD J. DENT

ANSELM HUGHES

EGON WELLESZ

Page 14

CONTENTS

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

v

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

xvii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

xxiii

I. PRIMITIVE MUSIC. By MARIUS SCHNEIDER, Professor of Comparative Musicology, University of Cologne

Comparative Musicology

1

Melody and Mankind

2

The Origin of Music

5

Totemistic Music

8

Culture and Race

12

The Formation of Scales

14

Structure of the Melodic Ambit

17

Origin of Polyphony

20

Variation and Types of Melody

23

Historical Development

28

Music and Speech

31

Instrumental 'Language'

32

The Musical Instruments

33

Repertory

38

The Importance of the Musician

40

Spiritual Culture

41

Music Examples

61

II. THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA. 1. CHINA By LAURENCE PICKEN, Fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge

Introduction

83

Prehistory and Ethnology of the Far East

84

The Place of Music in Chinese Civilization

86

Chinese Musical Instruments

88

History of Theory and Notation

93

History of the Music

101

Chinese Instrumental Heterophony

124

The Structure of Chinese Instrumental Music

125

A Tsyr Melody

125

Opera

126

Folk-Song

130

Buddhist Music

133

Page 15

x

CONTENTS

III. THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA. 2. OTHER COUNTRIES. By LAURENCE PICKEN

Mongolia

135

Shinjiang (Chinese Turkestan)

136

Tibet

137

Korea

142

Japan

144

Miau

150

Luoluo and Minjia

154

Nagas

155

Annam

156

Cambodia

159

Siam (Thailand)

162

Burma

164

Java, Sumatra, and Nias

165

Bali

170

Other Islands of the Indian Archipelago

176

Cultural Interrelations

180

Glossary of Chinese Characters

190

IV. THE MUSIC OF INDIA. By ARNOLD BAKE, Reader in Sanskrit, University of London

Introduction

195

Cultural and Philosophical Importance

196

Vedic Music

199

The Classical System

204

Classical Instruments

220

Modern Developments

225

V. THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA. By HENRY GEORGE FARMER

Introduction

228

The Primitive Element in Music

229

The Music of the Temples

231

Secular Music

236

Instruments of Music

239

The Theory and Practice of Music

246

Notation

249

The Heritage

250

VI. THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT. By HENRY GEORGE FARMER

Introduction

255

Primitive Musical Survivals

256

Religious Music

258

Page 16

CONTENTS

xi

Secular Music

262

Instruments of Music

266

The Practice and Theory of Music

274

The Legacy

279

VII. MUSIC IN THE BIBLE. By carl h. kraeling, Director

of the Oriental Institute and Professor of Hellenistic Oriental

Archaeology, University of Chicago, and lucetta mowry,

Professor of Biblical History, Wellesley College

Limitations of Biblical Information

283

The Nomadic Period

284

Early Palestinian Period

286

Monarchic Period

290

Music in the Temple

291

The Prophets and Music

293

Secular Music

294

Lyrical Metres

294

Instruments

295

After the Captivity

296

Graeco-Roman Period

300

Services of the Synagogue

301

Music in the New Testament

303

The Church outside Palestine

307

Early Christian Antiphony

311

Gnostic Hymns

311

VIII. THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM. By eric

werner, Professor of Jewish Music, Jewish Institute of Religion,

New York

Introduction

313

Continuity of Jewish Tradition

314

Cantillation of Scripture

316

Psalm Tones

318

Autonomous Melody

318

The Modes of Synagogue Music

320

The Influence of Poetry on the Development of Synagogue Music

324

The Music of Italian Jewry

326

The Music of Central European Jewry

329

The Music of East European Jewry

331

Disintegration of Synagogue Music before the Era of Emancipation

332

IX. ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC. By isobel henderson, Tutor in

Ancient History, Fellow of Somerville College, Oxford

The Musical Tradition in Antiquity

336

Traditions of Harmonic Science

340

Grammar and Syntax

344

Page 17

xii

CONTENTS

The Tonoi 348

The Notations 358

The Extant Musical Documents 363

The History of Greek Music

(i) Music in Homer's Greece 376

(ii) The Music of the Early Lyrics 378

(iii) Aeolian Music 382

(iv) The Harmoniae of Plato's Republic 384

(v) The 'Enharmonic' Music 387

(vi) Aristophanes and Athens 390

(vii) Plato and the Revolution 395

(viii) Music after the Revolution 397

X. ROMAN MUSIC. By the Reverend J. E. SCOTT

Introduction 404

Instruments 406

Social Status of Musicians 410

Military Music 411

Music in Everyday Life 413

Music in the Theatre 414

Recitals and Virtuosi 416

Imperial Amateurs 417

Music Teaching 419

XI. THE MUSIC OF ISLAM. By HENRY GEORGE FARMER

Islamic Civilization 421

The Cultural Background 422

The Rise of Islamic Music 427

Secular Music 433

Religious Music 438

Instruments of Music 442

The Practical Art 447

The Theory of Music 456

The Influence 464

BIBLIOGRAPHY 479

CONTENTS OF THE HISTORY OF MUSIC IN SOUND, VOLUME I 504

INDEX 507

Page 18

ILLUSTRATIONS

KRISHNA PLAYING A FLUTE

Frontispiece

Relief from a temple at Belūr (Deccan). Hoysala Dynasty, twelfth century.

Reproduced by courtesy of the Bollingen Foundation.

I. PRIMITIVE INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 34

(a) Xylophone. Ten flat wooden keys with gourd resonators, two strikers, and fibre cord for hanging. Baluba of Lake Moero, Congo.

(b) Slit drum, hollowed from one piece of wood, terminating at each end with a woman's head showing artificial cranial deformation. Struck with a wooden stick. Made by the Mangbetu of East Sudan.

(c) Zither made from bamboo, with eight strips slit away from the surface and bridged to form strings, the hollow bamboo acting as a resonator. Dyak, Borneo.

(d) Wooden rattle, enclosing small stones, representing the raven, sparrow-hawk, and a demon absorbing through his tongue from the frog the power of working spells. Painted blue, red, and black. Haida Indians, North-West America.

(e) Zansa with eight iron keys and gourd resonator. The hands are put through the slots and the keys plucked by the thumbs. Ibo of Onitsha Province, Nigeria.

Reproduced by courtesy of the Curator of the Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford.

II. PRIMITIVE WIND INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 38

(a) Side-blown trumpet carved from elephant tusk. West Africa.

(b) Bone vertical flute with three finger-stops and one thumb-stop drilled by stone borer. Ancient Peruvian, Chancay.

(c) Conch-shell trumpet, side-blown (Triton giganteus variegatus). Nares Bay, Admiralty Islands, Pacific.

(d) Whistle made of a reindeer phalanx. One blows between the two nearer articular condyles against the edge of the hole. Upper Palaeolithic, about 20,000 years old, from the cave of La Madeleine, Dordogne, France.

(e) Globular gourd flute with two stops. Jarawa, Northern Nigeria.

Reproduced by courtesy of the Curator of the Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford.

III. CHINESE INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 88

(a) Seven-stringed zither (guuchyn); dorsal aspect, showing the seven silk-gut strings and the thirteen mother-of-pearl studs marking the nodes. The tassels are decorative extensions of the looped silk cords which pass through the tuning pegs to secure the strings.

(b) The same; ventral aspect, showing the seven tuning pegs, the two knobs round which the ends of the strings are tightly twisted, the two sound holes ('Dragon Pool' and 'Roc Lake'), the personal name of the instrument: 'The Dragon's Purr', and the seal of the engraver.

(c) Globular flute (shiun). Three finger-holes are visible; two thumb-holes are present on the side away from the camera. This is a modern replica made to the specifications of the present Bureau of Rites and Music.

Page 19

xiv

ILLUSTRATIONS

(d) Two globular flutes of Tarng date in the form of human heads. The eyes are the finger-holes.

(e) Mouth-organ(sheng). The apparent length of the pipes is not in every case the effective length; holes on the inner face of the pipes may shorten the length of the air column. The pipes speak only when the finger-holes visible near the base are closed. The instrument is held with the pipes almost horizontal. This is a Japanese instrument.

(f) Detail of the same. This shows the ends of two bamboo pipes removed from the wind chest; one still carries a thin sheet of copper (white with verdigris) in which a rectangular free reed has been cut. The frequency of vibration has been adjusted by means of the small blob of wax near the free end.

(g) Vertical six-holed flute(shiau). One of a pair of instruments from Yuhbing, a famous centre for flutes.

(h) Detail of the same. The blow-hole is cut in the nodal diaphragm, and the wall bounding its outer rim is trimmed to a sharp edge. The embouchure is not fixed (as in a Western recorder, for example), and practice is required to make the shiau speak.

(i) Clay whistle flute in the form of a bear, from Shandong. The blow-hole is in the forehead. The stream of air strikes a sharp edge bounding the lower margin of the air-exit on the dorsal side.

(j) Bamboo ‘whistle’ from Shandong. Two bamboo free reeds are let into the wall of each of two short bamboo tubes, closed at both ends. On the side away from the camera, two small mouth-pieces are let into the larger tubes. The reeds are tuned about a semitone apart and are set in motion simultaneously by blowing into the mouth-pieces.

IV. (a) CHINESE PLAYERS OF MOUTH-ORGAN,SHENG, AND PERCUSSION-CLAPPER, CHONGDWU.

facing p. 94

From Prince Ju Tzayyuh, The Handbook of Music (1596).

(b) CHINESE SONOROUS STONES, CHINQ, ASSOCIATED WITH LAUDATORY DECLAMATION, TOGETHER WITH THE HAND-DRUM, TAUR.

From Prince Ju Tzayyuh, op. cit.

V. (a) CHINESE ROC-HEADED VERTICAL HARP WITH EIGHTEEN STRINGS

From Chern Yang, Yueh Shu (13th-14th century).

(b) CHINESE SEVEN-STRINGED ZITHER TABLATURE

From the end of the twelfth century. This is a song with zither accompaniment and an interlude for zither alone. Reading from right to left the columns are: first the title, and then alternately tablature and text. The tablature is described on page 99 and transcribed as example 186. The interlude extends from the sixth to the eighth column. From the Syhbuh Tsongkan edition.

VI. CHINESE AND OTHER FAR-EASTERN INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 136

(a) Two-stringed Manchurian fiddle.

(b) Mouth-organ in use among the Chingmiau near Anshuen, Gueyjou Province, China. The free reeds of the six pipes are of copper and are lancet-shaped. They are tuned with blobs of wax. In this instrument the wind chest is of wood.

Page 20

(c) Jew's harp of three tuned elements in use among the Lihjiang I olo in Yunnan Province, China. The three elements are gripped between thumb and closed fingers of the left hand and set in motion by plucking the projecting 'keys' with the fingers of the right hand.

(d) Toy Jew's harp played by Minjia children in Shiijou, near Dahlii, Yunnan Province, China. The vibrating tongue is much thicker below the forked tip than elsewhere. It is set in motion by jerking a silk-gut cord attached to the lower end in the photograph.

(e) Three-stringed idiochordic bamboo tube-zither from Borneo. The strings are slivers of bamboo raised from the surface of the tube.

(f) Mouth-organ from Borneo. The wind-chest is a gourd.

(g) Detail of the same. Two of the free reeds are shown in pipes removed from the wind chest. Each reed is a rectangular tongue cut in a thin sheet of bamboo let into the wall of the pipe. Near the free end of each there is a thickening, comparable to that on the tongues of Minjia and Lolo Jew's harps (figures (c) and (d)). This figure should be compared with Plate III, figures (f) and (j).

Figures (a), (e), (f), and (g) are reproduced by courtesy of the Curator of the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.

VII. (a) INDIAN VÎNÂ PLAYER

facing p. 214

A representation of the Rāginī Syāma Gūjarī. This rāginī is said to belong to the rainy season and should be sung in the early hours of the morning, expressing a mood of sadness and melancholy. (Bodleian Library MS. Laud. Or. 149 fo. 33v.)

(b) A BURMESE ORCHESTRA, SAING TYPE

For theatrical and other performances on a large scale. Melodic instruments: oboes with detachable brass bell-mouths; a graduated scale of drums played with the hands; a graduated scale of brass gongs played with wooden strikers tipped with disks of buffalo hide. Instruments for rhythm and emphasis: a bass drum struck with the fist, and four drums played by the hands; drums beaten with sticks; cymbals; wooden spring clappers. Pictures copied from E. J. Colston, 'A Monograph on Tanning and Working Leather in the Province of Burma' (Rangoon, 1903), by courtesy of the Curator of the Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford.

VIII. MESOPOTAMIAN INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 240

(a) Assyrians playing lower-chested harps (reign of Ashur-nāṣir-pal, 883-859 B.C.). Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

(b) Harp from Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.). Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

(c) The royal Elamite orchestra, showing upper and lower-chested harps, double reed-pipes, and drum (reign of Ashur-bāni-pal, 668–626 B.C.). See pages 237–8. Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

IX. EGYPTIAN INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 274

(a) Lower-chested harp and flute (Eighteenth Dynasty, c. 1570–1310 B.C.). Reproduced by courtesy of the Director of the Rijksmuseum, Leiden.

(b) Harp, lute, and double reed-pipe (c. 1475 B.C.). From the tomb of Amenemhet, Thebes. Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

Page 21

xvi

ILLUSTRATIONS

X. GREEK INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 352

(a) A kithara player singing.

An Athenian vase c. 480 B.C. Reproduced by courtesy of the Museum of

Fine Arts, Boston.

(b) A Greek Music School.

The instructor is playing on a lyre and singing; about him are youths

playing double auloi, and holding flutes and lyres. Athenian vase of the

early fifth century B.C. Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the

British Museum.

XI. ROMAN INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 406

(a) A Priest of Cybele.

Relief showing cymbals, tympanum, and twin Phrygian pipes. (c. A.D.

150.) See p. 405.

(b) Roman Musicians at the Circus

Showing the tuba, hydraulus (with female player), and cornu. From a

mosaic at Zliten (late first century A.D.).

XII. A ROMAN CONCERT

facing p. 414

Showing twin pipes and kithara. See page 413. From a fresco at

Herculaneum. Reproduced by courtesy of the Museo Nazionale, Naples.

XIII. ARABIC INSTRUMENTS

facing p. 456

From the Kitāb al-Adwār of Ṣafī al-Din 'Abd al-Mu'min (d. A.D. 1294)

(a) Lute of five double strings (Bodleian Library MS. Marsh 521, fo. 157ᵛ.

A.D. 1333-4).

(b) Psaltery of thirty-two strings (from the same MS., fo. 158).

(c) Harp of thirty-four strings (Cairo MS. f. j., 428. A.D. 1326-7).

The Arabic in figure (a) gives the names of the parts of the instrument,

whilst that in figures (b) and (c) indicates the tuning. See pages 462–3.

XIV. ARABIC MUSIC MANUSCRIPTS

facing p. 464

(a) British Museum MS. Or. 2361, fo. 32. Late thirteenth century.

(b) British Museum MS. Or. 136, fo. 38ᵛ. Late thirteenth century.

For a transcription of these see pages 454–5.

Reproduced by courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

Page 22

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

The second edition of the Oxford History of Music had an Introductory Volume edited by Percy C. Buck which dealt primarily with those facts and forms which preceded the rise of polyphony, and included other subjects which had been omitted in the first edition. Explaining the scope and content of the volume, Buck stated 'that the understanding of any subject can only be derived from the study of how it came to be what it is'. This aim was not fully realized in the Introductory Volume, because its chapters were not designed to form a unity, but to fill the gaps in the main body of the work. It has needed the replanning and rewriting of the whole history of music as delineated in the 'General Introduction' to make it possible to approach Buck's far-sighted postulate.

During the two decades that separate the publication of the Introductory Volume and the planning of the New Oxford History of Music musicological research has made great progress in the field covered by the present volume. Phonograph and gramophone have made it possible to study the music of remote and primitive peoples. The methods of transcribing the music have improved. Comparative musicology, that new branch of musical research, regarded in its beginnings some fifty years ago as a side-line, has enlarged its scope and developed its methods. Orientalists have taken an ever-increasing interest in writings about music and passages in historical works referring to it. Students of comparative liturgiology have given the initiative to an investigation of the relationship between Jewish and Christian chant, and their work has led to the examination of the passages on music in the Holy Scriptures in a new light.

The present volume takes into account this widening of the field of musicological studies, which has created a new outlook. The first chapter gives an introduction to the essentials of all kinds of primitive music. The main part of the volume, Chapters II-VIII, gives a historical survey of the music of the East. The next section, Chapters IX-X, contains a survey of Greek and Roman music, and the last, Chapter XI, deals with the music of the Islamic world.

It has been clear to the Editor from the beginning that the treatment of such vast and divergent material in a single volume must be carried out on different principles from those applied to the other volumes of the History. There, as pointed out in the General

B 3608

b

Page 23

xviii

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

Introduction, music is seen as an art, closely connected with various trends of our Western civilization. Such treatment not only permits but enforces the application of the so-called 'historical method' which aims at describing the single work of art as a product of the creative mind of a composer; or, where this is impossible, at a description of the creative tendencies of a group or school of composers who remain anonymous.

When we come to deal with non-European music, however, we cannot apply the same criteria as we use in studying and appreciating the music of the West. In the East music has—or at any rate had until recently, when social changes, the wireless and the gramophone have so much altered the whole outlook—still preserved its ritual, even its magic character. The factor of time which governs the structure of Western music plays hardly any part in Oriental music. An Arabic song may last more than an hour, the performance of a Chinese opera stretch out over several days. To the Western musician conciseness of expression, clearly shaped form, and individuality are the highest criteria by which a work of art is judged; the attitude of the listener is an active one: he listens to what the composer has to say. The Eastern musician likes to improvise on given patterns, he favours repetition, his music does not develop, does not aim at producing climaxes, but it flows; and the listener becomes entranced by the voice of the singers, by the sound of the instruments, and by the drumming rhythms.

All this makes it difficult to apply our critical values to music which is so essentially different from our own. For example, in judging Chinese music, we are in the same position as the Chinese listeners to whom, as Amiot relates in his Mémoire sur la musique des Chinois (Paris, 1779), French missionaries played music of Rameau: it meant nothing to them. We have also a report from the nineteenth century of the effect of songs by Schubert on a Chinese audience; they liked the music as a play of notes, but objected that it did not move the heart.

How, one may ask, can one hope to acquire any knowledge of Oriental music, if such a cleavage exists in structure and expression between the music of the East and that of the West? And one may add, that objection applies to an even higher degree to our understanding and appreciation of primitive music, with which the present volume opens.

It is here that the work of the comparative musicologist begins. The student of this most recent branch of our studies will not confine

Page 24

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

himself to describing the peculiarities of each tribe whose music has been recorded. That kind of research precedes his work which, in the same way as the ethnologist's, must consist in showing the function of music in primitive life. Such studies must remain within the scope of general statement, derived from the material which precedes historical research.

A similar though more specialized approach must be applied to Oriental music. Here one must rely to a great extent on the judgement of those experts who have devoted themselves to the study of the music of a particular part of the civilized world from enthusiasm and a peculiar inclination, fully equipped with the knowledge of the language, the customs, rites, and ceremonies of the people whose music they investigate, and the experience of having heard the music performed in the surroundings in which it was created and to which it belongs. Some of the music, like that of India, Java, Bali, Laos, and Indochina, for example, appeals to the Western mind directly; that of China and Japan, however, needs a more thorough acquaintance before it is appreciated and before it is possible to distinguish between old and modern instrumental music; folk-songs on the one hand, and ceremonial and ritual music on the other. The main obstacle for the European listener in appreciating Far Eastern music comes in the beginning from the different method of voice-production. For the European, singing is a kind of elated speech; for the Far Eastern musician singing is opposed to speech: the voice is used like a highly strung instrument.

For the study of the Ancient Orient, of which no music has survived, we must turn to the visual arts to learn which instruments were used, and to literary sources to discover what those who wrote about their national music thought of it. In this case the task of the scholar will be similar to that of the historian: to state what he has read about the music, and to convey to the reader the impression that he has gathered from his sources.

To deal with Jewish and Islamic music and that of Greece and Rome a different approach has been felt to be necessary. Systematic studies in Jewish music are of recent date and are based upon the methods of comparative musicology. It has been necessary to determine how far the oral tradition can be traced back, and to what extent time and cultural changes have altered the character of the music. The result of these studies has been more positive perhaps than one dared to expect. For example, recordings of the religious music of Jewish communities who have lived for centuries separated from their neighbours have shown that they are still related to the

Page 25

xx

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

common source and, furthermore, that their psalm-tunes and many

other liturgical chants are closely related to, if not identical with,

those of the Christian churches, both Eastern and Western, who took

them over in the early days of Christianity. Thus a new basis for the

study of Christian chant has been established.

The approach to the music of Islam and the methods employed in

investigating its character and history have been the same. Here

again the integration of these studies into the history of Western

music will shed new light on some problems which are still under

discussion. With the chapter on Greek music we enter a field of

studies which, since the days of Humanism, has been favoured by

classical scholars. We need only recall Meursius's edition of the

theoretical treatises of Aristoxenus, Nicomachus, and Alypius,

printed in Amsterdam in 1616, followed by the more comprehensive

edition of Meibom in 1652 and of Ptolemy's Harmonicorum libri

tres, printed at Oxford in 1682. Bellermann's edition of Die Hymnen

des Dionysius und Mesomedes in 1840 aroused the interest of musico-

logists in Greek music, and from that time its investigation has been

an important subject of musicological research.

However, the study of Greek music has shown also the difficulties

with which one is faced in studying the music of a period from which

only a limited number of musical documents have survived. From

the writings of Greek poets, philosophers, and theorists Greek music

seems familiar to us. In fact, the music itself, when we read or hear it,

seems to offer no problems to our understanding from the formal or

aesthetic point of view. We find in it those qualities which appeal

directly to our mind: clarity of shape and conciseness of expression.

But how can we attempt to comprehend Greek music as a whole from

the few fragments which have come down to us?

Hermann Abert, a musicologist of the former generation, whose

book on the ethos of Greek music has become a classic, discussed this

question in a lecture on Greek music, given to the Prussian Academy

in 1923. He asked his audience to visualize the position of a musico-

logist who, 2,000 years from now, would try to give a picture of our

music with the following documents as the only material from which

to draw his conclusions: three bars from the St. Matthew Passion,

a drinking-song from the eighteenth century, a Mass by Bruckner,

half a dozen modern pieces for the piano; but, in addition, a great

many theoretical works from J. J. Fux's Gradus ad Parnassum to a

modern textbook on harmony. Would he be able to give an adequate

picture of our music from these sources?

Page 26

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

xxi

Such is our position in relation to the material of Greek music at

our disposal. But we may ask further: even if we had enough docu-

ments to enable us to make an historical approach, should we be any

nearer to a real understanding of its aesthetics or to a knowledge of

the effect it had on the audience for which it was written?

This question may well be asked about Oriental music also. We

must face the fact that the music which we read, or even hear on

records, can give us only a faint idea of what it means to the people

who live with it. This may be illustrated by a few examples, taken

from personal experience.

During the concerts given for the members of the first Congress of

Arabic Music at Cairo in 1932 we heard a Persian singer who sang

of his sorrow at leaving his friends. The audience, which consisted

mostly of Egyptians, became so excited that they forgot they were

listening to a song and shouted: ‘Stay with us, do not leave us.’

One felt at once that the artificial barriers which in the modern

concert hall separate the singer from his audience had been broken

down. For his audience the plaintive song of the singer had become

reality. I was reminded of the Greek classical play in which the

personae dramatis were for the audience not the actors in the role of

the heroes of the past, but actually the shadows of the dead heroes,

conjured up from Hades by the priest of Dionysus to perform their

deeds once more.

On another occasion we saw the solemn ritual of the ‘dancing

dervishes’. It was impossible to believe that old men who had per-

formed the whirling movement for more than an hour could sit down

when the dance came to an end without breathing more heavily, if

one did not assume that the music had produced a state of trance in

which the normal physical reactions were suspended. One was

reminded of the writings of the Platonists and Gnostics which describe

the sacred dances as the symbols of the movements of the moon, the

sun, and the stars, and music as a supernatural power, as an ἐπ-ανὀρ-

θως τῶν ἡθῶν, as a means to improve the character.

Finally we saw the dance of Egyptian sorceresses, who danced to

an exciting music of flutes, fiddles, and drums round the imaginary

body of a sick man. Here one felt at once: such was the kind of

music to which Plato refers in his Laws (790 d) when he speaks of the

‘female healers of Corybantic troubles’.

These examples, taken from the music of the Islamic world, could

easily be supplemented by a great number of others, all demon-

strating the magic effect of music. They would lead from travellers’

Page 27

xxii

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

descriptions of the rituals of primitive tribes to the writings of the

sages of Ancient China about the power of music to organize or

disrupt the order of the State.

This brings us to an explanation of the plan of the present volume.

The reader may object to the separation of the chapters on Hebrew

and Jewish music in this volume from those on ‘Early Christian

Chant’ in Volume II; with our growing knowledge of the develop-

ment of Christian from Jewish liturgy, one might have expected to

find both sections side by side. For similar reasons one might object

to the placing of Greek and Roman music in the first volume, because

both belong to European civilization and particularly because Greek

and Roman musical theory had a decisive influence upon medieval

theorists.

There is, however, a unifying idea in the volume. It deals with the

music of the non-Christian world: a world in which music is regarded

as a power creating a magic effect upon the listener. This magic

character of music ranges, according to the state of civilization of the

people who produce it, from totemistic connotations to music which

represents a certain rite or a certain ceremony and creates in the

listener the proper mood to participate in it. Considering the emo-

tional character of such music, one may well understand the many

warnings of the Fathers of the Church in the early days of Christianity

against any kind of singing which creates such an effect. Even St.

Augustine, brought up in the classical tradition and, as one knows

from the famous passage in his Confessions, enjoying music ‘which is

pleasing to the ear’, advises that the chanting of the psalms should be

nearer to recitation than to singing—pronuncianti vicinior esset quam

canenti—and says in another place: ‘We sing with our voice to be

excited, we sing with our heart to please God’ (Enarratio in Ps. 147, 5).

This rigid attitude of the Church in its first centuries shows that

she was aware of the magic power of music in the surrounding pagan

world. When the Christian faith was established as the acknowledged

religion all over the Roman Empire, it was no longer necessary; the

magic spell was broken. Music could now be used primarily as laus

Dei, to heighten the splendour of the service, and, in our Western

civilization, the way was opened for its development as an art.

Various circumstances, unavoidable with a composite work of this

kind, have caused delay in bringing out the present volume and

Page 28

INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME I

xxiii

have necessitated continuous revision. The Editor wishes to express

his own and the Editorial Board's thanks for the indefatigable efforts

of the contributors to keep their work up to date.

EGON WELLESZ

Lincoln College, Oxford

January 1957

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Acknowledgements are due to the following for permission to re-

produce music examples from the works cited: Librairie Delagrave,

Paris (A. Lavignac and L. de la Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la

musique); Paul Geuthner, Paris (A. Gailhard, Théâtre et musique

modernes en Chine); Breitkopf and Härtel, Wiesbaden (E. Fischer,

Beiträge zur Erforschung der chinesischen Musik); the Sven Hedin

Foundation, Stockholm (Reports from the Scientific Expedition to the

North-Western Provinces of China); W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., New

York (Curt Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, including

two examples after Frizzi (Peri)); T. Howard Somervell ('The Music

of Tibet' from the Musical Times); Colin McPhee (Angkloeng Game-

lans in Bali, A House in Bali, and 'The 5-tone Gamelan Music

of Bali'); the Editor of Anthropos, Poisieux; Mezhdunarodnaya

Kniga (500 kazakskikh pesen); Dr. Jaap Kunst (De eenheense muziek

in N. Guinea, 'Music in Nias', A Study on Papuan Music, and Over

zeldzame fluiten); Cha Fu-Hsi (extracts from recordings in the

Library of Congress, Washington); G. Schirmer, Inc. (article by

Colin McPhee, 'The 5-tone Gamelan Music of Bali', in Musical

Quarterly, April 1949); Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften

(R. Lach, Gesänge russischer Kriegsgefangener); the National Museum

of Canada (Jenness and Roberts, Eskimo Songs); the Smithsonian

Institution (Bulletins of the Bureau of American Ethnology); the

Editor, Journal de la société des Américanistes; the Finno-Ugrian

Society (A. Kannisto, Wogulische und ostjakische Melodien); Uni-

versity Museum, Philadelphia (Speck-Sapir, Ceremonial Songs of the

Creek and Yuchi Indians); the Syndics of the Cambridge University

Press (Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres

Straits, ed. A. C. Haldon); the Oxford University Press (P. Kirby,

'Bushmen', in Bantu Studies); and George Allen & Unwin Ltd. (a

translation by Arthur Waley of four lines from The Book of Songs).

Page 30

I

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

By Marius Schneider

COMPARATIVE MUSICOLOGY

Until a few decades ago the term ‘history of music’ meant merely the ‘history of European art music’. It was only by degrees that the scope of music was extended to include the indispensable foundation of non-European and, finally, primitive music. Since only a few relics of primitive music survive in European folk-music, to get any idea at all of primitive music scholars had to turn first to the primitive tribes still living in the Stone Age. At the same time the study of more highly developed non-European cultures, which had begun much earlier, was revived and a new branch of musicology concerned exclusively with non-European music came into being. This new discipline was called ‘comparative musicology’, its primary aim being the comparative study of all the characteristics, normal or otherwise, of non-European art. This study led to the establishment of connexions between European and non-European music.

It must be emphasized that the methods of the musical ethnologist are entirely different from those of the historian. For the student of primitive music Europe has played only a very small part in the total framework of human history. But he has to attempt to rediscover the bridges between European and non-European music which certainly once existed and to reconstruct them, theoretically at least, by means of comparative ethnology. The aim of the present chapter is to describe the music of the hunting, pastoral, and peasant peoples whose historical position is bounded at one end by the earliest primitive cultures and at the other by the beginnings of more advanced cultures. At the extreme end are those pastoral and peasant peoples, for example the Caucasians, who already show the marked influence of a highly developed culture and must be included because their tradition, still alive today, provides the key to the understanding of those ancient civilizations which can now be investigated only by purely archaeological methods.

Although all the material dealt with here is of recent origin, we shall use the term ‘historical development’ as understood by the

B 3608 B

Page 31

2

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

ethnologist who attempts to bring into historical order the medley of

primitive, transitional, and advanced cultures which still exist side by

side in the world today. ‘Higher development’ simply means a

general historical process and is in no way intended as a criterion of

musical value.

MELODY AND MANKIND

Primitive music is a separate field of its own, but to a much greater

extent than art music it is bound up with everyday life and with many

special factors: psychological, sociological, religious, symbolic, and

linguistic. Some songs must be performed only by a certain individual;

others must be sung only by men or women. The same melodies may

have a quite different psychological meaning, according to whether

they are sung falsetto, or with a nasal or chest voice. For a proper

understanding of any given musical phenomenon direct contact with

the singers and their surroundings is therefore indispensable. The

conception that we can get from the written version of a simple

melody is quite inadequate (and may even be entirely misleading)

unless we have this practical experience. In particular we need to be

acquainted with the method of performance of the people concerned

and the tone quality they produce, in order to hear the song correctly.

It is a simple matter of experience that the actual transcription of a

melody will vary essentially according to whether it is made from

a direct hearing and seeing of the singer or only indirectly from a

gramophone record. In the first instance the rhythm of the song as a

whole will be more accurately transcribed; in the second the melodic

details will be better reproduced. A primitive melody is always the

musical expression of an idea. Primitive man sings only when he has

something definite to express. Since his singing is the spontaneous

expression of his thought, song and speech are often mingled in the

course of his performance. If one tries to introduce a primitive man to

a new tune (without the foreign words which he cannot understand)

he will never stop asking what the song is about. For him the thoughts

expressed in the song are at least as important as the melody itself.

But if he hears a melody that pleases him, the words of which he does

not understand, he will at once add words of his own. Even his instru-

mental melody and his whistling are the expression of definite ideas.

Thus the roots of programme-music reach down into the earliest

strata of instrumental music. Whether the simple sing-song of certain

kinds of children’s songs and lullabies is entirely bereft of ideas has

still to be proved. The idea need not be clearly formulated in words;

Page 32

MELODY AND MANKIND

3

it may consist of a vaguely defined thought, felt rather than conceived,

expressed directly in sound without the mediation of an intelligible

sequence of words. It may also happen that the logical thought and

the musical motive pass little by little from the indefinite to the

definite in the course of the song, as if the initial dream-state were

gradually yielding to waking consciousness. Many of the supposedly

nonsensical syllables to which a melody is sung also have a magic

significance. Thus the syllable hee often serves to express the shooting

of an arrow and hoo has a medical value. Such syllables serve to evoke

a spirit or frighten it away. Just as one cannot sound a medicine-rattle

heedlessly or merely for fun without falling ill, so one must not sing

thoughtlessly to oneself, for every note summons up a spirit. Melody

has a great significance for primitive man, a magic power which

must not be squandered or abused. The agreement of sounds is

always a symbol of identity or at least of mutual understanding. In

the Solomon Islands, when an invitation is sent to a neighbouring

tribe it is customary to send the measurements of the tribal panpipes

so that the guests can tune theirs beforehand, thus ensuring the

greatest agreement in the mutual musical greeting. When young men

are singing, and it suddenly occurs to one of them to strike up so high

a melody that the other singers cannot follow him, sometimes a young

girl will take up the melody in this high register and continue it.

When this happens, it means that the two young people are in love.1

A melody is not a chance combination of notes but an organic

and dynamic whole, a form which is more than the simple sum of the

notes of which it consists. A succession of single notes artificially

put together is ineffectual because it is a synthetic product, not

a living one. The aboriginal describes a melody of that kind as

'powerless' because it is not in a position to offer a dwelling-place to

a spirit. Primitive melody, which is scarcely more than a continually

repeated and varied motive, is regulated essentially by the tension

between the beginning of the motive and its final note. All the notes

between are determined by conscious striving towards the last note.

Both the motive and the series of its repetitions grow according to

definite patterns which can assume the most varied forms according

to the particular culture or the ideas and feelings expressed.2

This growth of melody is undoubtedly one of the main reasons why

music is so significant in the life of primitive peoples. Music and

dancing create a movement which generates something that is more

1 M. Leenhardt, Arts de l'Océanie (Paris, 1947), p. 58.

2 See infra, p. 24.

Page 33

4

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

than the original movement itself. As he sings and dances, man discovers in himself an all-pervading element whose intensifying, liberating, or healing power is unknown to him in everyday life. Music which has such an intensifying effect grows to the point of ecstasy. The quietly and regularly flowing rhythms lead to a great inward release. I have myself observed the liberating and healing power of music in the case of a native of Uganda who, at the funeral of a brother (killed by a spirit), at first broke into a terrible howl of rage and then, beginning to sing, gradually defeated the black demon of despair by the soothing power of song.

The effects of musical rhythm are especially strong when singing is accompanied by dance movements or by the singer's own playing on an instrument. Of course this purely instinctive, primitive music-making has at this stage nothing to do with art. Nevertheless, even in the oldest cultures we find the preconditions of art: the mastery and more or less conscious shaping of the medium of expression. Where the singer who is at the same time dancing tries to achieve a certain regularity in his movements, his singing takes on regular musical forms. The pure play-instinct certainly has a great part in this shaping of the melody into regular phrases. On the other hand it must be noted that even ecstatic songs and dances often exhibit very rigid phrase-structure.

This regularity of tectonic structure is even more striking when the community takes part as a choir. But the participation of a choir not only helps the regularity of the rhythmic movement: it also contributes materially to the unification of the melodic line. The African pygmy dances in Father P. Schebesta's collection1 usually begin with a wild cry for all the singers out of which a comparative unison gradually emerges. The melodic lines and the various rhythms of the opening gradually adjust themselves to one another and in the end there emerges a completely regular community chant.

The powerful influence of collective performance on the development of primitive music can be seen from the fact that even funeral music and love-songs are also very largely choral. The life of the individual is so strongly bound up with the community that the latter will not relax its guardianship even during the short hours of the wedding night, which it celebrates with continual singing.

The collective consciousness, however, does not lead at all to a musical 'levelling'. The distinction between soloist and chorus is always maintained. This hierarchy is expressed both by different

1

In the Phonogramm-Archiv of the Berlin Museum für Völkerkunde.

Page 34

MELODY AND MANKIND

methods of performance and by the degree of ecstasy to which the

singers gradually abandon themselves in the ritual songs. The soloist

is the master, the choir are his 'assistants'. Even when both sing the

same song the soloist performs it sharply and abruptly, the choir in

a more cantabile (arioso) manner. The soloist dances; the choir forms

a magic protective circle around him. The soloist intensifies his

rhythms more and more in order to penetrate into the land of spirits.

But this he can do only with the help of the chorus, whose singing

and hand-clapping set him in motion and lead him to a state of

ecstasy. When the movement is in full swing, the relation between

singer and song seems to be completely reversed, for the dancing

soloist, who is the initiator of the melody, is now borne along by the

song. The music is a vehicle, a ship or a road, transporting the mortal

to another land. All movements become reflexes. While the dancer

adorned with dangling rattles abandons himself to the mysterious

powers of the rhythmic sounds, he senses that out of this game that

he himself has created something is growing that is greater than he.

He grows with the song and entwines himself about it until the

moment when he identifies himself with it and becomes a human

rattle. Then his soul ascends into the land of the spirits, while the

chorus guard his body until the soul returns to it.

THE ORIGIN OF MUSIC

According to the old European theory, music begins at the point

where clearly distinguishable intervals appear. In contrast, speech is

regarded as a succession of variations of pitch. This distinction is

not applicable to primitive music, however, or to non-European art

music, because these involve the use of all the vocal resources,

including whispering, speaking, humming, singing, and even yelling.

In the same way, at some time or other any implement capable of

producing a rhythm becomes a 'musical instrument' in the hands of

a savage.

It is very difficult to say anything definite about the origin of music,

because the phenomenon is quite outside the range of our observa-

tion. Even in those primitive civilizations that still exist there is no

race so primitive that it can be considered a relic of the very beginning

of human culture. Naturally there is no lack of theories about the

origin of music. Charles Darwin attributed song to the imitation of

animal cries in the mating season. Against this, it is to be noted that

while it is true the imitation of animal cries plays a big part in the

oldest civilizations known to us, love-songs are very rare and usually

Page 35

6

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

mythological rather than erotic in character. Rousseau, Herder,

and Spencer1 argued that speaking with a raised voice was the begin-

ning of song; and a kind of ‘speech song’ or chant-like recitative is

indeed to be found in many primitive cultures. Whether this style is

derived from speech seems very doubtful, however, in view of the

many nonsense syllables (without verbal significance) which form the

‘text’ of these songs. Wallaschek2 stresses the importance of rhythm in

the origin of music. Buecher3 even traces its beginnings to occupational

rhythms, overlooking the fact that occupational songs belong to a

very late stage of cultural history.

According to Father W. Schmidt4 and Carl Stumpf5 music arose,

like speech, from the need to give signals by sound. A loud cry led

to lingering on a note of definite pitch. With this basic idea Stumpf

linked his theory of consonance: if the cry was uttered simultaneously

by men and women so that it sounded in two different pitches at once

ditones resulted, preference being necessarily given to octaves, fifths

and fourths owing to their high degree of blending. If such sounds were

then sung successively, instead of together, an interval resulted and

its progressive breaking up into smaller parts led to the formation of

melody. In Stumpf’s view, the real step towards the development of

music was the breaking up of the original ditone into successive notes

and the transposition of ‘cry’ notes and musical motives. This

theory conflicts, however, with the fact that in many primitive

cultures the motives are often made up of very small intervals and

motive-transpositions usually occur at very close intervals.

Although we must reject the hypothesis that speech is proto-

morphic music, it is still possible to speculate whether the very

ancient ‘sound-languages’ may not represent the common source of

both speech and music. In these languages, which will be dealt with

more fully later,6 the meaning of a syllable depends on the pitch at

which it is uttered. Thus such a language is itself musical. If it is

sung, music merely gives a more arioso effect to the melodic speech-

curves already determined by etymology; it merely strengthens the

existing musical element. It is, of course, possible that the whole

1 The theories of Darwin and Spencer, no longer tenable today, are discussed in

detail by Stumpf in ‘Musikpsychologie in England’, Vierteljahrsschrift für Musik-

wissenschaft, i (1885), pp. 261-349.

2 Primitive Music (London, 1893).

3 Arbeit und Rhythmus (Leipzig, 1924).

4 ‘Über Musik und Gesänge der Karesau-Papuas’, Kongressbericht der internationalen

Musikgesellschaft (Vienna, 1910).

5 Die Anfänge der Musik (Leipzig, 1911).

6 See infra, p. 32.

Page 36

language is merely a sort of levelled-down music; but it is more likely

that the sound-language is the older element from which developed

both speech and song, speech striving towards free rhythm and music

towards a more regulated one. The greatest difficulty in the way of

this new theory is that at present we know too little about the lan-

guages of the so-called primitive cultures. It is true that various

pygmy races display the elements of 'sound-languages' but so far only

a small number of examples have been collected. For this reason my

own researches have so far been confined to the African Ewe languages

and to Chinese songs. Some songs of the pygmy Batswa, of the

Congo, recently recorded by the Rev. Father Hulstaert and discussed

by F. Tegethoff in a still unpublished Cologne dissertation, however,

show such marked agreement of musical and speech sounds as to

appear to support the theory of the common origin of music and

speech.

It is idle to discuss the relative merits of these theories because the

primitive material available exhibits features which support one as

much as another. In the primitive cultures known to us speaking,

shouting, imitation of animals, and the rhythms of movement all

tend to musical forms whenever man feels the need of a more beautiful

or more effective means of communicating his impressions or wishes.

By so communicating them man frees himself from the impressions

which accumulate in his inner consciousness. Even a simple shout-to

a fellow human or to a higher being-expressing a desire for action,

betokens a liberation. The way it is used in war shows, however, that

it also serves to dispense strength. If the shout is followed by additional

sounds which are not strictly necessary, the psychic relief is even

greater; for by such growth the song not only releases but actually

unfolds the emotion which has hitherto been confined or seeking

expression.

In music there emerge very quickly hard-and-fast, conventional

melodic forms which by reason of their indeterminate significance

can easily become vehicles of the most varied subjective feelings; so

the objective formala, generally recognized and accepted, combines

quickly and easily with the subjective feelings of the singer. In this

way music has a unifying effect in human society. Melody liberates

and gives objective form to feelings that to begin with were amor-

phous, ultra-subjective, or exaggerated.

Singing allows innumerable repetitions of the same words, repeti-

tions which, apart from magical utterances, seem meaningless or

clumsy in ordinary speech; it also enables things to be said or hinted

Page 37

8

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

at which it would be difficult to express in sober speech. To the uninitiated the words of such songs are for the most part completely unintelligible; but the aboriginal knows exactly what the few, apparently quite disconnected words mean in association with a particular melody. In some way or other music throws a neutralizing veil over that which is individual and realistic, giving it the appearance of something objective and universally valid or typical, without prejudicing its subjective emotional value. It is easier to sing a love-song than to speak a declaration of love. A musical motive, which when performed in a certain way is regarded as a formula of scorn, seems more indirect than plainly spoken abuse. An idea set to music is more formal, more general, or more ambiguous than the same idea expressed in words alone because it is subject to a regular rhythm. In language something of the same kind occurs in the proverbs which, for the same reason, are so popular with primitive peoples.

Besides this spontaneous musical invention—of which sing-song, as an expression of the simple play-instinct, is another example—the imitation of natural sounds plays an important part. Admittedly Schaeffner, disinclined as he is to generalize, is perfectly correct in saying: ‘Toute une fausse optique de l’art musical découle d’une idée abusive de l’imitation.’1 When a savage beats a piece of wood it is a spontaneous act not necessarily originating in any intention of imitation, and although many songs and dances do imitate animal noises, it is unnecessary to trace particular forms, such as the dialogue or the alternation of solo and chorus, back to similar phenomena in the animal world, since human society arrives at such forms unaided. In any case there is no reason why animals should have ‘invented’ such forms more easily than human beings.

Nevertheless, the purely realistic (and also the approximately musical) imitation of natural sounds forms an important constituent of the music of the oldest primitive hunting and food-gathering peoples among whom totemism is an individual affair, that is, not yet the basis of society.

TOTEMISTIC MUSIC

To grasp the significance of totemistic cultures in the history of music it must be remembered that the totemistic conception of the world is anthropomorphic. The natural world is animated by a variety of good and evil spirits, more or less endowed with voices, whose continual interaction determines the course of the world. The sounds

1 André Schaeffner, Les Origines des instruments de musique (Paris, 1936), p. 14.

Page 38

of nature are the voices of the spirits who dwell in natural objects.

All objects and living things in the world were created by the totem

gods (the mythical ancestors of mankind), created, moreover, in such

a way that every totem-god during his sojourn on earth called into

being only one particular kind of object or creature, i.e. one definite

totem, by means of songs and war-dances: the kangaroo-god, the

kangaroo; the cloud-god, the cloud; the flute-god, the flute. In

Australian mythology these mythical ancestors, having finished their

work and taught men the rites and songs necessary for the mainten-

ance of Creation, sank down exhausted in a cave, died, and became

petrified or turned into bull-roarers. Their ‘mystical’ bodies survive in

their totems but they left to man the actual care of maintaining things.

In view of this fact men began to divide the task between them, in

each tribe entrusting one person or group with the care of a particular

totem and the worship of the corresponding god (or ancestor). As

each object (each kind of stone, plant, animal, wind, musical instru-

ment, &c.) represents a particular totem, in theory the totemistic

order of society constitutes a complete reflection of the world. In

practice, however, and possibly as a later development, the animal

totem predominates.

The connexion with the totem or the mystic ancestor is established

by the person concerned imitating the particular object which it is

his duty to maintain, that is, his own totem. If the totem is a tiger

or a snake, he must behave like a tiger or a snake and if need be even

have direct intercourse with one of the creatures. For example, if the

tiger-man has a drum he must not play it in the usual way, but must

bite and scratch it as would his totem animal. If, to take another

example, he has been assigned to the wind or storm, he will fulfil his

task by means of a corresponding pantomime, like influencing like.

But the essential part of the imitation is the simulating of sounds, for

of all the available means of imitation the human voice is far and

away the best. The form and movements of the human body can be

brought to resemble the outward appearance of the totem only to a

limited degree with the aid of dancing, masks, and other adornments.

The voice, on the other hand, can imitate so well as really to deceive.

One must have heard them to realize how extremely realistically

aboriginals are able to imitate animal noises and the sounds of nature.

They even hold ‘nature concerts’ in which each singer imitates a

particular sound (waves, wind, groaning trees, cries of frightened

animals), ‘concerts’ of surprising magnificence and beauty.

In totemism the voice has much the same significance as, on a

Page 39

10

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

smaller scale, numbers had for the Pythagoreans. It is a mysterious

bond uniting all things in the universe. If a man is capable of repro-

ducing exactly the croaking of the frog or the hissing of the snake, it

is because his mystic ancestor was the totem-god of the frog or the

snake. When he imitates the voice of his totem with the greatest

realism, he imagines he is obliterating the boundary between subject

and object and identifying himself with his totem. Whoever croaks

like a frog, is a frog. By vocal assimilation he ‘recognizes’ the object

and in that moment becomes the thing recognized. He becomes in fact

a sound-symbol. This symbol, perhaps the oldest in the history of

human culture, which presupposes no technical or material skill, is

the voice of a dead ancestor, whose mystic body survives in the

totem. The song represents the dwelling of the dead ancestor, or is

itself the dead ancestor, who, together with all the other ancestors,

forms the substance of the world.1 Vocal imitation is the strongest

form of mystic participation in the surrounding world.

Here we come upon one of the oldest forms of magic. By singing

the name, or the song, the acoustic substance of the totem-god, or

by playing his flute in the presence of the corresponding mask, one

recognizes him and forces him to sound in the singer’s breath, in the

mask or in the flute, that is, to become substantially (acoustically)

present. Just as one can make an open string vibrate by sounding its

own note on another nearby instrument, so one can conjure up a

spirit by providing it with its mystic station. Evidently the voice or the

sound ranks as the ultimate indestructible substance of each object.

This substance leaves the body of a man at death by escaping through

his mouth in the form of the death-rattle, or through his nose as the

sound of his breathing, and carries his soul away. ‘You are blind

but your ears are not deaf! Listen to me!’ said a Bakango chieftain,

rattle in hand, at the grave of a famous hunter. The idea of the acoustic

nature of the soul, which survived into the Middle Ages in Europe

(symphonalis est anima, said Hildegard von Bingen) and was taken

up again by the German Romantics (notably by Friedrich Schlegel),

is manifest among primitive peoples particularly in the belief that,

even after the disappearance of the last mortal remains, the soul of a

dead man (that is, the substance of the human being) survives as an

essence (spirit) which is perceptible only in sound.

Every human being has his own sound or is a particular melody. To

stop a magician (magicians are capable of imitating the otherwise

inimitable) from imitating this melody and so getting its bearer

1 See infra, p. 43.

Page 40

into his power, primitive man thinks it necessary to keep his own melody as secret from sorcerers as his ‘real’ name.1 (The intonation of the name is closely related to that of the melody.) Among the Gogodara each clan has its own death-songs which must be kept secret even from the other clans, because they contain the names of the ancestors. The assumption that sound forms the mystic substance of the human being explains the belief that two people having the same name represent merely the dual expression of the same individual.

This leads to the question of the widespread ‘personal song’ which is often identical with an individual’s medicine-song or totem-song. It may be sung only by the person to whom it belongs. Only after its owner’s death may a friend or relative venture to sing the dead person’s song at the funeral. This song honours the deceased but it has real magic power only when sung by the ‘song-father’. The melody of a personal song need not be an original composition but may well belong to the current repertory of the tribe. What makes the melody a personal song is the individual manner of performance. The term ‘personal song’ refers not to the melody as such but to something almost inimitable in the method of performance, the timbre of the voice, the particular rhythm the singer gives to the song. The concept of the ‘personal sound’ seems to lie still deeper. It is to some extent the primary substance out of which the ‘personal song’ is formed and it seems specially closely connected with the timbre of the voice.

As the substance of every being is revealed in rhythmic sound, it is obvious why the timbre of the voice plays such a crucial part in the individual totem system in deciding a man’s mystic descent. Similarity of voice betokens a fundamental relationship. From this it follows that it is only at puberty, that is, when his voice breaks, that a young man is finally named, assigned to the totem, and introduced to his ritual duties. At this time, too, his real musical education begins; he learns the ritual songs and the use of the sacred musical instruments.

The idea of sound as the substance of things may derive from the daily experience of the primitive huntsman as he tries to get animals in his power by imitating their cries and by the use of magic words of terror. But here too, perhaps, age-old mystical traditions regarding the true essence of the natural world are at work. At any rate imitation among primitive peoples is a form of mystic participation which enables a man in everyday life to ‘invoke’ and entice a natural object

1 i.e. the name which best reflects phonetically the essence of the human being. Primitive peoples usually give their children a great number of names. The name by which the child is normally called is unimportant.

Page 41

12

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

and, by adapting himself to it, to subjugate it or assimilate it to himself—an end unattainable by force.

CULTURE AND RACE

To obtain a reasonably comprehensive picture of the various peoples and cultures of the world, ethnologists have adopted a classification of races according to the predominant forms of their economy and the state of their culture (which probably corresponds to these forms). They distinguish between primitive food-gathering, hunting, pastoral, and agricultural peoples, although there are many races which do not clearly belong to any one of these groups, either because they are culturally or economically in a state of transition, preserving many archaic elements from lower stages of civilization, or because they have been subject to cultural influences which (theoretically) do not correspond to their normal way of life. Thus totemism appears to belong to the early hunting stage, although there are strong traces of it in the middle farmers’ cultures and a particular late form has developed among some cattle-breeding tribes.

The primitive food-gatherers include in particular the pygmies and pygmean races. Hunting, pastoral, and agricultural races are usually divided into lower, middle, and higher groups. The lower groups comprise the totemistic patriarchal hunters, the agricultural and matriarchal civilization based on two classes, and the patriarchal nomadic shepherds. A late stage of hunting civilization is found among former cultivators who have been forced out of their domiciles and have turned to hunting from necessity. The middle pastoral peoples develop cultures dependent on saddle-animals. The middle farmers use a more developed form of hoeing, while the late farmers use the plough and, like the shepherd-warrior group, show very many megalithic and even later influences from high cultures. This theoretical order, which is mainly due to the Vienna school,1 may be represented by the so-called inverted pyramid of civilization:

1 The reader will find a concise summary in O. Menghin, Geschichte der Steinzeit (Vienna, 1931).

Page 42

CULTURE AND RACE

13

To this ethnographic classification there is a corresponding musical one. If one considers the material so far available1 the three main groups (hunters, shepherds, and cultivators) may be distinguished, theoretically, as follows. Among the hunters, musical performance is interspersed with much shouting, is formed from free speech-rhythms, and has little tonal definition. Among the cultivators, however, an arioso style of performance prevails; the style is tonally regulated and the form is rounded off. The pastoral cultures occupy a middle position. With the hunters, metre is the strongest factor in determining form and is the expression of a very individual kind of music-making, while with the cultivators the collective note and the balance between metre and melody are more important.

This scheme which can be no more than a first attempt to organize the wealth of material, is naturally to be taken cum grano salis, since over each of these theoretical strata (based on the ‘pure’ cultures) are laid others which do not always agree with the first and may even be of quite a different nature, in fact with no cultural connexions at all. Thus, for example, within the same culture, historically considered, the singing of the woman is naturally more cantabile than that of the man. Very often we find coexistent modern, archaic, and foreign styles reflecting the historical development. The hunting songs of farmers who have been formerly hunters are always more authentic than those sung on the hunting expeditions of farmers pure and simple. The true hunting song is rooted in the mystique of the hunt, whereas the late hunting song is merely for entertainment.

If one considers the predominant cultural role of the man in hunting and pastoral societies and that of the woman in agricultural societies the following scheme results:

Hunters——Shepherds——Cultivators

Man Woman

Predominance of Metre Predominance of Melody

Polyphony Harmony

The concepts of polyphony and harmony naturally apply only to the narrowly bounded regions in which part-singing occurs.

Racial characteristics in music are easily detected when one actually hears a singer, but they cannot be described in words. Race shows itself by timbre, by the general rhythm of movement, and by types of melody, in so far as these exhibit particularly individual forms.2 Deliberate screaming or abrupt transition from high falsetto

1 To which the present writer would add his unpublished transcriptions from the Phonogramm-Archiv of the Berlin Museum für Völkerkunde.

2 See infra, p. 24.

Page 43

14

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

to chest and abdominal voices do not enter the category of racial

characteristics, however, because they represent ideals of performance

belonging to specific cultures and are acquired by conscious effort.

THE FORMATION OF SCALES

Up to now the question of the formation of a tonal system1 has

been answered, notably by Hornbostel and Robert Lachmann,2 by

the assertion that a fixed scale was impossible without instruments

giving clearly defined intervals. As such instrumental tunings are a

product of late civilizations, a real tonal system could not be produced

by primitive races. Strangely enough these two scholars, to whom

comparative musicology owes such a great debt, hardly took any

account of the fact that the very oldest instrumental tonal systems

(which led Hornbostel to the ‘blown fifths’ theory3 now refuted by

Bukofzer and others) do not use the natural (pure) fifths, although

in the vocal music of primitive peoples these intervals not only

frequently determine the tonal framework of the individual motives

but are everywhere found to have the greatest influence in the forma-

tion of scales. In fact tonal systems are formed without the help of

instrumental tunings. They grow progressively in primitive vocal

music out of fanfare-like formations or out of the elementary fourth and

fifth relationships which are found above or below a melody of

narrowly restricted range (Exs. 10, 14, 53, 61, 67, 68, 79, and 80).4

These intervals are even all the clearer and more definite for being

free from any influence of instrumental music. The natural tone-

system is built up entirely of consonances, the only exception—

especially in primitive and middle cultures—being those notes which

are derived from the harmonic division of a consonant melodic

interval. Where, however, rows of overtones (Ex. 63) or slightly

flattened fifths or widened seconds are sung, we may take this as

evidence of the direct influence of instrumental tunings (musical

bow5 or panpipes).6 When the same song is performed simultaneously

1 Marius Schneider, ‘Ethnologische Musikforschung’, in 2nd edition of Preuss and

Trimborn, Lehrbuch der Völkerkunde (Stuttgart, 1956).

2 Musik des Orients, ii, 1 (Breslau, 1929).

3 According to this theory the oldest tone-systems arise from a succession of over-

blown fifths, i.e. they are formed by slightly flattened fifths. See E. M. von Hornbostel,

‘Musikalische Tonsysteme’, in Geiger and Scheel’s Handbuch der Physik, viii (Berlin,

1927); Manfred Bukofzer, ‘Kann die Blasquintentheorie zur Erklärung exotischer

Tonsysteme beitragen?’, Anthropos, xxxii (1937), p. 241; Ll. S. Lloyd, ‘Hornbostel’s

Theory of Blown Fifths’ in The Monthly Musical Record, lxxvi (1946), pp. 3 and 35; J.

Kunst, Around von Hornbostel’s Theory of the Cycle of Blown Fifths (Amsterdam, 1948).

4 The musical examples to this chapter are grouped on pp. 61–82.

5 P. Kirby, ‘The Musical Practices of the Bushmen’, Bantu Studies, x (1936), p. 381.

6 E. M. von Hornbostel, ‘Die Musik auf den nordwestlichen Salomo Inseln’, in R.

Thurnwald, Forschungen auf den Salomo Inseln (Berlin, 1912).

Page 44

THE FORMATION OF SCALES

15

or alternatively by voices and instruments, the melody proceeds in

two different tunings. The instruments perform it in their own scale,

the voices in theirs (built from natural fifths).

As songs with or without a definite tonal organization are often

found side by side in the same culture, we must distinguish two kinds

of primitive vocal music. The first, which is perhaps the older, is

closely related to speech, to the realistic imitation of natural sounds,

and to emotional outbursts of only slight musical form. It is manifest

not only in recitative, tonally very free recitative (Exs. 5 and 6), but

also in songs of abuse and laments. In religious songs it may even

be traced well into the late cultures. These songs are by no means

limited to a narrow compass; among the American Indians they even

extend to an astonishing range (up to 2½ octaves), particularly when

motives are freely transposed.

Nevertheless, even in these freely intoned songs there is a recogniz-

able tendency to use a clearly defined fourth or fifth as the basic

melodic formula and to group the other tonally indefinite notes more

or less freely around it. If these formulae are transposed, at least one

of the two basic notes is generally found to have a consonant relation-

ship to the first exposition of the motive. In Exs. 18, 19, 22, and 25

this transposition and consonant relationship have a direct influence

on the development of the tonal system for, although the motives

are only small, and only their basic notes are tonally definite, yet by

reason of the transposition of the basic intervals the whole song

already displays in its broad outlines a succinct tonal order. Yet, in

view of the fact that transpositions of the smallest motives are to be

found in very early stages of cultural history at distances of a second

or third (Exs. 17 and 20), neither the pentatonic scale consisting of

seconds and thirds nor the form interspersed with semitones can be

considered older than the six- or seven-degree scale.

With the extension of the consonant relations there emerges a

tone-structure which may be traced back in the field of primitive

music as a rule to a more or less large extract from the series of fifths

(B flat) F, C, G, D, A, E, B (F sharp). The fact that the keys formed

from the series of fifths are so much closer than most of the primitive

instrumental tunings to our European musical sense can probably be

explained only by supposing that the vocal tone-system has been

evolved in a natural and specifically musical fashion, whereas in the

tuning of instruments (which are an artificial product) quite different

principles were applied—such as, for example, the breadth of the

thumb as the standard for the space between flute-holes. It is true

Page 45

16

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

that there are frequent departures from the system of natural fifths but in many cases the significance of such notes may have been over-estimated. It seems very doubtful whether the measurement of vocal pitches will ever lead to useful results, unless account is taken of the difference between what the singer intends and what he actually achieves. Measurements taken by the writer from a native of Uganda showed that a high note which seemed diatonically too low became quite pure in a second recording in which the song was pitched lower. Moreover, such departures are sometimes quite deliberate. For example, from the above-mentioned measurements it became clear that a note was intentionally taken too low in order to represent the ‘weeping note’.

The essence of musical functions is probably best grasped by considering in the first place not the individual modes, but the whole system of relations of the fifths to one another and by regarding different ‘keys’ only as specific extracts from the series of fifths. In a melody the functional tension (which can, of course, be essentially increased or diminished by the metre) is intensified by increasing the relative distance of the individual notes within the series F, C, G, D, A, E, B. Moreover, the notes F, C, G, and D appear the strongest, probably because they are the most fundamental. (We are assuming that the corresponding melodies are all transposed to a pitch involving the least possible use of accidentals.) In fact it appears that the tonal relationships in the F or C mode are much less complex than in the G, D, A, or E mode. If we take for the primitive motive, in so far as it has a tonal character, F as the fundamental note and F–A or D–F as the germ cell, we find apart from the second above or below the tonic, the fourth below (Exs. 61 and 86) or the harmonically or diatonically divided fifth above (Exs. 80, 82, 83, and 84) as the main function. The augmented fourth above (tritone melodies: Exs. 85, 87, and 113) is probably a late phenomenon.1 On the other hand, melodies in the C mode (Exs. 10, 13, 22, 26, 37, and 52), in addition to the tonic and its neighbours, stress particularly the fourth, that is the ‘subdominant’ F. Songs in the G mode (Exs. 15, 32, and 49) emphasize both the subdominant C and the double subdominant F. Songs in the D mode lay stress on G, C, and F (Exs. 19, 33, and 48). The A and E modes are even richer in relationships (Ex. 21). In other words, the number of functional relationships grows as the fundamental note of the mode advances from F through C and G to D, A or E, for these relationships seem to grow not out of the brilliance

1 J. Kunst, Music in Nias (Leiden, 1939), p. 7; Music in Flores (Leiden, 1942), p. 35.

Page 46

THE FORMATION OF SCALES

17

of the dominants but out of the dark depths of the subdominants F, C, G, and D. This is, naturally, not to say that in the last-named modes one cannot have a phrase of the greatest functional simplicity; but in these modes the functional possibilities are far greater than in the simple ones of F and C. The scales of all modes can also have seven degrees but the number of notes of real functional importance is limited in the F and C modes to a few notes, while the more highly developed modes (G, D, A, and E) include all the functions of the modes preceding them. This may be expressed in the following table in which the vertical lines represent the progressive increase in functions of subdominant origin:

mode c d [e] ⟨f⟩ [g] a (b) ⟨c⟩ d e f c " [b] ⟨c⟩ [d] e f g a b ⟨c⟩ d e f g g " [c] ⟨d⟩ [e] [f] ⟨g⟩ [a] b c ⟨d⟩ e f g d " [c] ⟨d⟩ [e] [f] [g] a [b] c ⟨d⟩ e e f g a a " [c] [d] e f [g] ⟨a⟩ [b] c d e (e " [c] [d] ⟨e⟩ [f] g a ⟨b⟩ c d e ⟨ ⟩ Tonic; || Subdominant; — Dominant; [ ] Note next to tonic

This theory, put forward by the writer in 1934,1 is confirmed in vocal polyphony in which the tonal relations sketched above—according to mode—are apparent in the selection and nature of the concords.

STRUCTURE OF THE MELODIC AMBIT

The tonal functions discussed above are expressed within a given ambit. The number of patterns which determine the main outlines of a composition is very great and it would be a hopeless undertaking to attempt to enumerate and describe them all here. We will therefore confine ourselves to mentioning the normal patterns which have been most important in the historical development of music. In considering the structure of the ambit we shall take the motive or theme as the given point from which the development of the ambit proceeds. It must be admitted that the separation of the theme from its continuation is in many cases very problematical, but the mass of available musical material enables us to discern definite norms. Apart from this, the musical structure can often be determined from the words. Owing to lack of space, however, it is possible to include the words in the musical examples only in the most important cases.

1 M. Schneider, Geschichte der Mehrstimmigkeit, i (Berlin, 1934).

B 3603

C

Page 47

18

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

The main principle in the continuation of a given theme consists

of varied repetition. In this repetition many melodies remain per-

sistently within the tonal ambit given by the motive in the first place.

This applies not only to narrow two- or three-note melodies but also

to more broadly constructed ones (Exs. 1, 2, 3, 7–9, 75–84, and

87–93).

There is a very common tendency gradually to diminish the com-

pass with which a melody has begun. Some songs consist merely of

a short introductory motive whose final notes are repeated at such

lengths that they represent the greatest part of the piece (Exs. 10 and

14). With themes of wider range one would be inclined to attribute the

progressive lowering of the top notes to fatigue. But it occurs just as

much with quite short motives of limited compass as with longer

songs (Exs. 11–13, 15, 16, 52, 72–74). Often at the end only the rhythm

of the theme, instead of the melodic line, is repeated in the cadence

notes (Ex. 21). In Ex. 71 the first note of bars 2, 4, and 6 is

lowered each time.

An essential part in the determination of ambit is played by the

attack of the first note and by the form of cadence. Sometimes a song

is introduced by a long high note giving the effect of a shout (Ex. 86).

Very often the singer’s voice is heard sliding down glissando-

fashion from a high note, musically almost indefinable, to the first

tonally defined note of his song (Ex. 4). On the other hand, the end of

a song may also consist of a loud cry (Ex. 12) or a short high motive.

An upward swing is rare at the beginning of songs of narrow compass,

but quite common when the motive is based on a fourth or fifth,

although it is much commoner in later cultures than in early (Exs. 45,

49, 51, 58, and 66).

Simple transpositions of motive occur even in quite primitive

cultures. They are often simple displacements of the tonal centre

within the same melody (Ex. 27). The Australians, the Marind-

anim of New Guinea, and the inhabitants of the Torres Straits use a

model in which a short motive descends stepwise at each repetition.

By this means the motives are joined to form a unified line (Ex. 17).

Where the motives are longer or the transposition intervals wider, the

repetitions are more clearly separated. At the same time, the motive

can be repeated exactly or freely (Exs. 18 and 19), with smaller (Exs.

21 and 22) or wider (Exs. 25–26) intervals. If the motive is trans-

posed only once, the ‘two-zone song’ results; this is found in its

simplest form among the Copper Eskimos (Ex. 53). In the later

development of this pattern, the repetition of the theme either merely

Page 48

follows the shape of the original statement or answers the exposition. The answer is often only metrically related to the theme, while the melodic line goes its own way. Instead of varied repetition, the theme is ‘developed’ (Ex. 108).

The tonal ambit can also be extended by giving more emphasis to the lower notes of the motive in the second exposition or by stretching the melodic material so that in the repetition the closing note is lower than it was in the original statement (Exs. 27–29, and 32). The extended form of the motive obtained by the lowering of the cadence (Ex. 30–48) can then be carried further by transposition (Exs. 31, 38, and 39). Often a progressive breaking away from the motive sets in, so that the last repetition may contain a completely new component phrase (Exs. 32, 35, 40, and 42). The arrangement of Exs. 30–51 shows the increasing intervals between the cadence notes.

In another pattern the voice, while repeating motives of narrow compass, takes a sudden upward or downward leap (Exs. 54–56). These newly acquired notes lead in some cultures to forms of yodelling (Exs. 62 and 134), in others they are linked with the melodic basis in a more continuous fashion (Exs. 57–60). Such patterns may in many cases have led to the songs constructed on the triad. That such forms can also originate independently, however, is shown by the occurrence of fanfare-melodies in cultures in which this pattern does not exist (Exs. 63–65). Here too we find transpositions (Ex. 66) and repetitions within diminished compass (Exs. 72–74). Exs. 67–70 also use motives in contrary movement which divide the song into two parts within the narrowest range. In general these patterns, like the ‘triad’ forms (Exs. 75–82), are not very favourable to a concentration of functions. In these structures based on thirds, fourths, or fifths there is a tendency to utilize the functions contained in the limits imposed by the motive only when the wide-leaping movement becomes somewhat restricted. Exs. 75, 83, and 84 introduce the upper fifth by a stressed second above it. In fourth-motives the relation between the third and fourth is emphasized (Exs. 92 and 93). In fifth-motives the relation between fourth and fifth, or third and fourth, becomes structurally important (Exs. 88–91). This structural wealth within a constant compass seems to represent the highest development of these limited melodies.

Apart from the upward transpositions of motive and the rising curves at the beginning of the ‘triad’ forms, both comparatively rare, upward extension of compass is an historically late product (Exs. 95–97). In early cultures such upward extension is generally very

Page 49

20

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

small. But it increases when it is introduced by means of a new phrase,

i.e. a new motive (Ex. 94). If this second phrase is followed by the

repetition of the first we have the ternary form ABA. Rising melody is

generally richer in functions than falling. Some patterns are arch-

shaped (Exs. 98–102); others widen their compass by exceptionally

wide leaps (Exs. 103–7).

The last phrase of a song often has a special significance in the

structure. Besides the elastic repetition of the final notes or the trans-

formation of the last exposition of the theme into a free phrase, a

concentric condensation of the thematic substance is common (Exs.

36 and 37). Of particular importance is the cadence in form of an

ostinato motive (Exs. 8, 15, 51, 65, 88, and 145–9), which, unlike

the other sections, is not varied when the stanza is repeated, is often

sung polyphonically, and sometimes slows up the tempo by a third

(Exs. 65 and 147).

ORIGIN OF POLYPHONY

All these patterns which develop the compass by progressive

variants lead to polyphonic forms when they occur simultaneously

with the theme. Polyphony originates when two singers—consciously

or not—perform the same theme in different forms (within a given

pattern). In many cases the varying of the theme is paralleled by a

variation of the words1 (Ex. 147). Primitive melody does not grow

out of harmony; harmony is rather the product of melodic variants.

The attempt to trace the origin of vocal polyphony to chance observa-

tion of consonant intervals emitted by sounding objects must be

rejected for three reasons. First, consonances occur in a perfectly

natural way when the same melody is sung simultaneously by men

and women or children. The frequent alternation of unison with

octave, fifth and fourth, is due to the extent to which these intervals

blend. It seems very doubtful whether an organic polyphony could

develop from these forms, because its geographical distribution sug-

gests that it cannot be any older than canon and the heterophonic

variation (Ex. 110) which exhibits a great number of dissonant

intervals. It would seem that strict parallel motion is devoid of all

possibility of development. For this reason it is found quite unchanged

in primitive and late cultures alike. Secondly, even if consonance

were a necessary precondition for the creation of polyphony, its

discovery could not have been due to musical instruments, since

melodic instruments are historically far younger than vocal polyphony.

1 M. Schneider, ‘Gesänge aus Uganda’, Archiv für Musikforschung, ii (1937), p. 185,

ex. 29.

Page 50

The distribution of polyphonic singing also shows that (apart from chance parallelism and the musically undeveloped drone) the 'chance discovery' of consonance must have been confined to the white and black races, while it is just in those regions where gongs originated—that no vocal polyphony exists. Thirdly, such an organic structure as canon could never have arisen from the chance observation of consonance; yet canon is one of the most primitive forms of polyphony. These things arose spontaneously and cannot be explained in a mechanical fashion. Canon, which develops from the idea of following and hunting, was still called chasse or caccia in medieval Europe. Song and bodily movement are so closely related among primitive peoples that it seems completely misguided to attempt to explain their spontaneous musical creation by speculative methods.

Ex. 110, belonging as it does to a very primitive cultural stratum, proves that the oldest polyphony occurs without the use of consonant intervals at all. This kind of polyphony exhibits a special development, springing from strong emphasis on the individual. Acoustically it aims rather at the fusion of noises than at the pure concord of definite notes. In the concerted imitation of natural sounds (see p. 9) each singer adopts the voice of his own totem quite independently of the other performers, yet the total impression is entirely pleasing to the ear and just as 'harmonious' as when we hear simultaneously the song of birds, the buzz of insects, and the rippling of a stream. Atonal polyphony achieves a special form in concerted instrumental music.

Canon is one of the oldest patterns of vocal polyphony. Among the Kenta (pyg­mies of the Malay Peninsula, cf. Ex. 112) the imita­tion is usually very strict. The same applies to their neighbours, the Sakai. The African pygmies and bushmen use a more or less free imitation (Exs. 111 and 114). On the island of Flores, where many remnants of ancient Papuan tribes survive, the canon is sometimes worked out over a third free part or over a drone (Ex. 113)—the pes of the canonic forms of medieval Europe. In contrast with the small intervals before the imitative entries in these examples, among the Badiki of the primeval African forest (Ex. 115), in the head-hunting songs of the Naga (Ex. 117), in the Congo, in the Solomons and in Samoa (Ex. 116) we find forms in which the voices enter at longer distances.

If the theme is repeated simultaneously (instead of canonically) and strictly, parallel parts result (Exs. 118–20). Often two voices first proceed in unison until they separate through each placing a different

Page 51

22

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

functional interpretation on a certain note. The extremely wide geographical distribution of parallelism in fourths and fifths may go back to the ancient Negroid patriarchal (old Sudanese) cultures. Among the pygmy and hunting tribes and in the Solomons it is usually mixed with elements of descant (Exs. 124, 127, and 128–30). Parallelism asserts itself throughout history with the utmost tenacity and we still find it in the Caucasus and in Europe (Exs. 121, 122, and 127). It may be doubted whether parallelism in thirds is really so recent as is generally supposed, since it occurs in the middle cultures (Exs. 126 and 133). Parallelism in seconds possibly represents the debased product of a highly developed culture1 (Ex. 125). The alternation of fourths and thirds (Exs. 131–3) is extraordinarily widespread, as is also parallelism within tonal limits, i.e. a vocal parallelism interrupted at the points where its bitonal implication would disturb the unity of the phrase by introducing notes foreign to the tonal system. The harmonic system which has developed particularly strongly in Africa is closely connected with the development of the tonal system. The new notes which are added by polyphony to the canto fermo represent functional variants of the melodic notes within the given key; and just as every mode contains in itself the melodic functions of the preceding ‘key’ (see p. 17), so also every ‘key’ comprises the harmonic possibilities of the preceding scale.2

Intervals

f mode. Notes

c mode. g (2)4(56) (b) 235 34(57) a 234(5) 235[c] (2)4(56) c 234(5)d 34(57) d (e) 34 e 235 [f] 234(5) g 34 a c

g mode. (g) a b 235 34(57) e 2345 235 f [g] 234 a b c

d mode. (2)4(56) a 234(5) 235[d] 2345 e 235 f 4 g 234 a c

If the simultaneous repetition of the melody is varied by contrary motion, a kind of descant appears (Exs. 134 and 135) which gradually develops into higher forms (Exs. 136–9). According to whether the linear or the harmonic element is predominant, polyphonic or chordal forms arise. In the Caucasus a choir is often contrasted with a solo yodeller. Broad series of triads are found in Indo-China, in the Caucasus, and in Europe (Exs. 140–3). In the primitive and middle cultures the endings of the songs often show a striking consistency, while the other sections vary greatly in each verse. These closes—

1 M. Schneider, El origen musical de los animales simbolos (Barcelona, 1946), p. 239.

2 The bracketed intervals are found less often.

Page 52

ostinato-like in effect—are very often accompanied by the choir

(Exs. 144, 145, and 148) or left to it entirely. If this ostinato overlaps

with the solo voices a special form of polyphony results, as seen in

Ex. 146. A further development, suggesting a primitive form of

chaconne, is shown in Exs. 150–2 which are taken from the shepherds

of Ruanda, the Ossetes of the Caucasus, and from medieval polyphony

(Codex de Las Huelgas).1

The very ancient drone form (Exs. 153–9) is as persistent as parallel

harmony but with greater possibilities of development. To this too,

an element of descant is very soon added. The long note held by the

choir (Exs. 160 and 161), as well as the short, repeated motive, appears

also in instrumental music (Ex. 162). The drone of the bagpipe, how-

ever, belongs to the higher civilizations.

VARIATION AND TYPES OF MELODY

The patterns described above appear in different forms according

to the musical energies which pervade them. These different aspects

must now be described in greater detail from the point of view of

variation and types of melody. The term ‘variation’ will be used to

cover all methods of continuing a given theme, although in later

cultures a kind of thematic development is already found alongside

the original variation form. By using the term ‘variation’ in this wider

sense we shall absolve ourselves from a hopeless attempt to establish

the extremely fluid boundary beyond which a given phrase can no

longer be regarded as a mere variant (a1) of a theme (a) but must be

interpreted as a new phrase (b). It is particularly difficult to define

this boundary in primitive music because the purely rhythmic element

is so much more important than the specifically melodic. What is

really repeated or developed in the continuation is the rhythm of the

motive. In early and middle cultures the simple repetition of the metri-

cal pattern takes second place and that of the melodic line third.

Therefore in analysing primitive melodies the varied repetition (a1) of

the motive (a) must be interpreted more freely than in many songs

found in highly developed cultures. A motive, the rhythm or melodic

line of which is considerably modified in the repetition, must not be

interpreted too hastily as a really new phrase (b) since the essence of

continuation in primitive music consists in variation and in progres-

sive breaking away from the given motive rather than in the thematic

contrast of the phrases.

1 The examples are published in full in M. Schneider, ‘A propósito del influjo árabe’,

Anuario musical del Instituto Español de Musicología, i (1946), exs. 61 and 61a.

Page 53

24

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

The melodic type is determined by the dynamic expressed in the subject and its continuation. The variation reinforces and develops in the continuation the thought presented by the theme; how this is done depends on the particular type of melody. Although some types of melody are very closely connected with certain forms of movement (time) or patterns (space) (Exs. 46 and 47), the metrical or linear aspects of a theme do not determine the type of melody to which it belongs, nor does the ambit. The typological affinity of two melodies often becomes more apparent only when similar metrical patterns and melodic curves join the same dynamic (Exs. 99 and 100). But the type is revealed above all in performance and in the particular way in which metre and melodic line coalesce in the rhythm. On paper it can be grasped only incompletely, but the ear detects it immediately. The same melodic idea, appearing simultaneously in the music of two different peoples, can be used by each of them in a different type (Exs. 148 and 149).1 On the other hand, the same type may appear in two different melodies although the actual notes may have little in common. Just as, for example, pastorales, gigues, or spiritually kindred human beings emit the same kind of atmosphere, so typological affinity between different melodies is based on a common atmosphere which cannot be defined by the actual notes or by weight or measurement, but by any musician should be able to recognize.

The subject broached here offers one of the most important fields for future research in comparative musicology. Hitherto, melodic types have been defined according to ‘the most obvious characteristics of the particular melody’ (Hornbostel). The criteria employed have included that of compass (‘narrow’ melodies, melodies in fourths, ‘triad’ forms) or spatial concepts (steplike melodies, terraced melodies, leaping melodies). But these designations cover only part of what is understood by the whole complex of a melodic type. Thus Hornbostel by ‘narrow melody’ (enge Melodik) really meant only the narrowest primitive melodies performed in a fairly free rhythm. ‘Fanfare melody’ means a particular style found among pygmies, but it does not include by any means every kind of fanfare-like song. With a few exceptions (for example, in tritone melodies) interval-structure is a bad criterion for determining melodic type, because it is too general. In the present description of primitive music the concept of space has therefore been excluded in defining types of melody.

1 A few years after the publication of the essay on ‘Wandernde Melodien’ in Archiv für Musikforschung, iii (1938), p. 363, the author played the melody of Ex. 148 to a Ewe man on the gramophone. As soon as the Negro heard the song, he claimed to know it very well and sang Ex. 149.

Page 54

VARIATION AND TYPES OF MELODY

25

Since metrical pattern is equally inadequate as a criterion, all we can do in the present stage of research is to collate melodies which appear to be related dynamically in some way or other1 and to abstain from a specific terminology. It might be useful, however, to revert to the Indian conception of râgas,2 according to which a type of melody is defined not by technical criteria but by its locality and definite poetic mood-content. The criteria proposed by Dincser3 for the classification of variants:

Isomelodic–isorhythmic–isochronic–isometrical—or heteromelodic–heterorhythmic–heterochronic–heterometrical

exclude any such fusion of musical and extra-musical elements. This attempt to establish a uniform terminology and an exhaustive classification of types of melody is to be welcomed. But the classification suggested is too formal: it separates things that essentially belong together. And its categories are too rudimentary for serious research. They cover only the external characteristics and omit the most important aspect of all: the dynamic nature, in other words, the quality of the melody.

Since acoustic feeling has no terminology of its own but has to borrow concepts usually applied to the other senses (we have to speak of sounds as being light or dark, hard or soft) this terminology is bound to encroach on non-musical fields. Taking fellah songs as an example, I have shown4 how in different melodic expressions of the same basic type the intensity may fluctuate or remain constant, how some variants may have strong or weak tonal relief, and how some parts may be constant in all versions and others continually varied; this was an attempt to work out the various forms of expression of a qualitative (dynamic) kind that are possible within a given type of melody, bearing in mind, however, that the growth of a melody is absolutely biological. It is only from such criteria that we can infer the nature of the type by which the variants are determined. By adopting this kind of terminology one is not escaping into a ‘foreign range of ideas inapplicable to music’ but merely accepting a make-shift which it is impossible to do without unless one is prepared to rest content with purely external, quantitative (and therefore, from a

1 Cf. W. Wiora, ‘Alpenländische Liedweisen der Frühzeit’ in Festschrift für John Meier (Lahr, 1949); and M. Schneider, ‘Lieder ägyptischer Bauern’, in Festschrift für Kodály (Budapest, 1942) and ‘A propósito del influjo árabe’ and ‘La canción de cuna’ in Anuario musical, i (1946) and iii (1948).

2 See Chap. IV.

3 O. Dincser, Die Probleme der Varianten in der Volksmusikforschung (Geneva, 1947).

4 M. Schneider, ‘Lieder ägyptischer Bauern’, in Festschrift für Kodály.

Page 55

26

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

typological standpoint, secondary) criteria of form. The term 'iso-melodic' which Dincser suggests using for two similar (typologically identical) melodies, the notes of which are different,1 is misleading since it ignores the most important thing of all: the existence of characteristic turns of phrase (variants) which are different in two songs although they belong to the same type. The great difficulty in all typology is establishing the dividing-line beyond which the variant of a melody deviates qualitatively so forcibly from the model that it can no longer be assigned to the same type.

Although the all-important acoustic impression cannot be reproduced here, an attempt must be made to show by a few obvious examples how the various types fashion the theme and its continuation in their own particular way. (If in the following lines examples of similar compass are grouped together, despite earlier insistence that compass is inessential, this is done in order to show the great differences that can exist within the same model.) Even in the most primitive cultures two basic forms of melody are to be found. The one proceeds from a clearly defined melodic idea which it varies in the course of the song. In the second form it is impossible to separate the primary idea from the variation since the entire song does not proceed from an idea clearly expounded at the beginning but expresses in constantly changing forms an idea that is never absolutely stable (Ex. 92). If the idea is clearly and concisely formulated at all, this formulation often occurs only during, or at the end of, the song.

The more primitive the models, the less differentiated they will be in type and in the working out of the musical idea. Songs such as Exs. 1, 2, and 27 occur very frequently in early cultures. In rather more developed cultures they often take on a definite metrical form (Exs. 3, 9, and 28), but both styles persist side by side right into advanced cultures. The same is true of purely recitative 'songs' (Exs. 5 and 6).

If one studies how different principles of continuation are applied in the various models, one often finds only a slight typological relationship between melodies based on the same model. In the examples where the compass is abbreviated (Exs. 10–16 and 72–74) only Exs. 13 and 14 or 72 and 73 seem to be related typologically. The songs of which the compass is formed by transposition or lowering the cadence (Exs. 17–52) fall into various groups. There seems to be a dynamic relationship between Exs. 17, 18, and 21; 30 and 31; 19, 32, 33, and (to some extent) 107. On the other hand Exs. 50 and

1 Dincser, op. cit., p. 85.

Page 56

VARIATION AND TYPES OF MELODY

51 differ completely in their rhythmic patterns although they follow

the same model so far as compass is concerned. Exs. 20, 34, and 58

are closely related although the last belongs to a different model.

Exs. 25, 26, 39, 40, and 47 also belong to each other so far as type is

concerned. Ex. 40 which, in pattern, is very much like Ex. 39, never-

theless belongs to the same type as Ex. 41. Exs. 23, 42, and 65 (which

last belongs to another ambit-group) form a separate dynamic group

of their own. Despite the very similar melodic outlines, Exs. 81 and

82, and 83 and 84, are not related dynamically. On the other hand,

there is a typological relationship between Exs. 78 and 79; 80 and 81;

59 and 88; 56 and 68; 69 and 70; 72 and 73. Despite the similarity of

the models on which Exs. 54, 55, 57, 59, and 60 are based, only the

first two seem to show some typological affinity. The dynamic

relationships are closer in the extended melodies of Exs. 92 and 93,

99 and 100, 103 and 104, 105 and 106.

It seems as if the more intensely specialized melodic types are bound

up with certain racial factors; otherwise it is difficult to explain the

coincidence of identical types found in America and Asia, Europe

or Australia, the relationships between Bushmen and Lapps or the

similarity between songs found in Indo-China and India proper,

Pamir, Afghanistan, and Central Asia and songs from Europe and

the Caucasus. It is difficult to accept the theory of cultural exchange

as an explanation, since the geographical distribution of these songs

coincides more with areas of similar race than with those of similar

culture. In fact, the innermost essence of the more intensely specialized

types of song cannot be transmitted at all, that is to say, cannot be

imitated, since the dynamic and the vocal timbre which is inseparably

bound up with it cannot be acquired by learning. However note-

perfectly a European may sing a Bedouin song, he will still be unable

to reproduce the essence of the type since the notation merely

represents the last and external result of the type. The European will

inevitably reproduce the song in one of the types with which he is

familiar. How deeply the type is rooted in men's constitution can be

seen by the fact that even within the confines of the Iberian Peninsula

a Spaniard from the north is incapable of singing correctly the highly

specialized cante jondo of Andalusia. Admittedly there are particu-

larly gifted individuals of great adaptability who succeed, after year-

long contact with a foreign musical culture, in acquiring its songs

to a high degree. But the expert will never mistake such an outsider

for a native singer.

The virtuosity of a few foreign individuals exerts only a very small

Page 57

28

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

influence on folk-music. Melodic types migrate only when the people

themselves migrate. It is certainly a great error to imagine that,

wherever some foreign utensil or cultural object has been introduced,

the corresponding music must inevitably have been adopted as well.

Songs do not travel as easily as carpets, vases, or ornaments, because

they are bound up much more intensely with the 'owner'.

The composition of a primitive song is also closely connected with

the melodic type. There is no doubt that a song proceeds from a

particular individual. Nevertheless almost every primitive composi-

tion is still in some way a collective work, since the folk-musician

composes very much in accordance with definite moulds. In Exs. 92

and 93 it is the fourth and the strongly accented leading note, in

Exs. 46 and 47 the metre which provides the model. The writer once

observed three Duala Negroes composing a song together. One of

them invented a short motive and also the words: 'The stranger has

invited us to drink.' To begin with, the motive had a fixed metre but

little melodic shape. Then all three sang the motive, each in a some-

what different melodic shape, and very gradually, after endless

repetitions, a quite charming motive emerged. The three following

phrases were then quickly added, since they merely varied the motive.

When the song was finished it represented no more than a fresh

melodic expression of a familiar metrical formula. In his book on the

Andaman Islanders, A. R. Brown writes: 'A man composes his

song as he cuts a canoe or a bow or as he paddles a canoe, singing

it over softly to himself, until he is satisfied with it.'1

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

It is very difficult to discern a historical process at work in any

given primitive race; at best one can do so only for a comparatively

short period. A song considered 'as old as the world' often turns out

to be no more than two generations old. If the whole range of primi-

tive music is studied in the context of the early cultural development of

mankind, however, the results are more promising. In any given

people there is hardly ever a straightforward process of development,

with primitive forms being displaced by higher ones. In the 'pyramid

of civilization' the various elements are superimposed on one another

rather than progressively displaced. Admittedly, a particular stratum

can become completely forgotten but normally what happens is that

as the variety of musical forms and styles increases each layer is

allotted a certain place where it can continue to thrive. In the middle

1 A. R. Brown, The Andaman Islanders (London, 1933), p. 132.

Page 58

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

29

cultures where the new forms are usually secular songs, the old songs

pass into the religious field or become children's or women's songs.

Native elements and those borrowed from other cultures often exist

side by side within one tribe. Nevertheless, foreign forms are not

adopted so much as is generally supposed. Even when two races of

different culture are in constant economic or military contact there

is little evidence that they adopt each other's musical forms. It is true

that a tribe that is stronger economically or militarily often uses

musicians from subject tribes for its festivities (for example, the

pastoral tribes of Ruanda make use of pygmies), but the degree of

reciprocal influence appears to be relatively small. Even when foreign

musical instruments are adopted, the relevant literature seems to be

taken over only to a small extent or in mutilated form.

If the whole complex of primitive music is surveyed, a number of

historical characteristics can be discerned according to the degree

of cultural development. Most of the ambit-patterns appear in early

cultures but their application is at first limited, gradually developing

later. The dynamic element which gives life to the pattern determines

the type of melody and thereby the special historical and geographical

development of the elementary model. Thus, according to the culture

in which it occurs, a pattern which circles round a central note may

become a recitative which is interrupted now by a high note, now by a

low one (Exs. 53-55), or it may develop into a gently oscillating song

(Exs. 59, 60, and 88). In the evolution of the more highly specialized

types, certain patterns will be highly developed while others will fall

into the background. Thus the 'transposition' pattern is far more

significant in Australia and America than in Africa. Among the Red

Indians double or triple transposition is one of the commonest

methods of continuation, while the Negroes (in so far as they use

the method at all) usually content themselves with a single trans-

position (Ex. 22). On the other hand, they use not only successive but

simultaneous transposition, producing polyphony (Exs. 119 and 120).

Where the patterns are realized in a primitive fashion, the European

generally finds them easy to understand since they reflect rudimentary

musical thought. On the other hand, where they are used within a

highly specialized type of melody, the idea that music is an inter-

nationally comprehensible language is exposed as an utter illusion;

such melodies can be approached only by way of careful analysis.

The absolutely unlimited wealth of rhythm revealed in the songs

of primitive cultures is very striking. In later cultures, however, there

is a strong tendency to organize the rhythm by devising definite

Page 59

30

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

metrical schemes. Fixed metrical formulas become to a certain extent moulds into which the melodic material is forced. These schemes can sometimes be so complicated and extensive (Exs. 51 and 101) that they appear to be free rhythms; but close observation of the repeated stanzas will show that the rhythmic patterns are in fact organized.

There is no evolutionary relationship between tonal and atonal music. Both forms occur very early side by side. It is true that atonal is gradually displaced by tonal music, but even in highly developed cultures it survives in recitative and in songs in praise of the dead or of animal gods.

In the phrase-construction the form a a′ a″ predominates. To the modest extent that primitive music allows, the development to ab, abc, and aba forms is already found in early cultures. The form ab appears to develop quite as much from a phrase a with an epilogue in the form of a shout or ostinato, as from the progressive differentiation of the repetitions of the motive. Fundamentally all musical forms are present in embryo in primitive cultures. Evolution proceeds essentially by the extension of the application of the given principles. The original patterns are moulded in many different ways: the rhythms extend over longer phrases or become more regular, the melodic phrases are given a wider span. The bi-partite Exs. 69 and 70 show concisely what Ex. 108 exhibits over a wider area. The transposition of Exs. 17 and 18 appears in an extended form in the numbers that follow. The progressive condensation of the series of functional parts is particularly important. Primitive themes are mostly very even, functionally, since their melodic lines often persist in the same function for a long time or because the contrast between two functions is only rarely emphasized by a metrically distinguished place. Even the different positions in which the motive appears when transposed are not always able to break up the dead level of the series of functional parts. The close series of melodic functions is best developed in melodies in which the compass is medium and constant in range (Exs. 87–93), or in spacious ascending melodies (Exs. 96 and 97). In the songs of late cultures the individual phrase is usually longer, and divides itself into two sub-groups.

It is only very slowly that the short motive with its varied repetition is replaced by a real theme developing consistently in the course of the song and leading to a new phrase which can be called the complement or answer. It is true that a tendency towards this process appears very early on (Exs. 69, 70, and 94) but it is not really applied until comparatively late (Exs. 95–97 and 101).

Page 60

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

31

Since some scholars have attempted to make a widening of the compass a criterion of historical progress it must be emphasized that wide and narrow compasses are found in almost all cultures. It must also be remembered that wide fanfare-like melodies and transposition are found in very early cultures. An attempt to classify the music of primitive races according to the concept of cultural cycles has been published by Werner Danckert.1

MUSIC AND SPEECH

There is no doubt that in the earliest cultures words and music are closely associated. The few reliable transcriptions of melodies and words available show that—except in purely syllabic songs—the smallest alteration in the words leads to a modification in the melody. In recitative and the mythological narratives, in which the melody often has a stronger curve, the relationship between music and words is different because the text predominates and the musical form is of secondary importance. A certain balance between music and words is sometimes attained by interpolating mystic syllables in the text, thus dividing the song into regular periods.

Often the text consists of merely a few words repeated over and over again, like the motive itself. In Ex. 13 the words ‘The frog leaps’ are constantly reiterated. Certain vowels or sonorous consonants sometimes take the place of actual words. A shout, or a few words expressing a wish, a surprise, a name or a short proverb, often constitute the entire text of a song. The result is that in primitive cultures the musical form is often more highly developed than that of the text. The whole emotional content of the text seems to be sustained entirely by the rhythm of the music. The broader the melodies and the words, the more the realistic expression of the words through song gives way to purely musical line-drawing and the close connexion between words and music is relaxed. Strophic forms or different words set to the same melodies are found particularly where the repetition of the melody is not very consistent. The Chippewa take the view that new words may not be set to old melodies unless the subject-matter is the same.2

Many of the texts are quite unintelligible to the uninitiated because they often presuppose the knowledge of some story, event or custom. When the Californian witch doctor says ‘In Dalmona I dig up the earth and find nothing but rotten turnips’, one has to know that

1 Anthropos, xxxii (1937), p. 1.

2 Frances Densmore, Chippewa Music, i (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 45), (Washington, 1910), p. 2.

Page 61

32

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

rottenness stands for disease and that in Dalmona the earth and the sick are both beaten with a digging stick.1 Frances Densmore has published a song2 sung by a grandmother to a child: ‘Say to me m m m and that I belong to you.’ Here the consonant m is a sign of love.

A very special relationship between music and speech occurs in the sound-languages3 where the meaning of a word stem depends on the level and direction of the intonation in which it is spoken (for example, be = to hide oneself; bè = to speak; bé = to take out). My researches on Ewe texts,4 Chinese songs and those of the African Batswa, have led me to the conclusion that there is certainly a direct correspondence between the high, medium, and low notes in speech and in music, though established rules may in many cases destroy it. Where there is a direct correspondence, the musical intervals move in the same direction as the speech intervals but differ in size. Normally the intervals are wider in song. Moreover, the tonal basis (from which the concepts ‘high’ and ‘low’ are derived) may be transposed in the course of the song (Ex. 43). An uninterrupted succession of high notes in speech will either keep to the same level in music or form a slowly ascending melodic line. In the case of low notes exactly the reverse applies. The most important rule is that notes that are high in speech can be low in music, if they coincide with a metrically emphasized point in the song. Similarly, low notes of speech can be high in music if they come on an unaccented beat in the song (Ex. 16).

INSTRUMENTAL ‘LANGUAGE’

The ‘language’ spoken by flutes, drums, and horns also appears to be closely connected with sound-language. Herzog5 gives the melody played on an African horn (Ex. 174) in which speech curves are reproduced. The Bubi of Fernando Po speak into a calabash on which they are able to reproduce five tones of their language.6 The whistle language (on mouth pipes)7 which Baumann regards as an

1 J. d’Angulo and E. d’Harcourt, ‘La Musique des Indiens de la Californie du Nord’, in Journal des Américanistes, xxiii (1931), p. 203.

2 F. Densmore, Nootka and Quileute Music (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 124) (Washington, 1939), pp. 277–8.

3 G. Herzog, ‘Speech Melody and Primitive Music’, in Musical Quarterly, xx (1934), p. 452.

4 M. Schneider, ‘Phonetische u. metrische Korrelationen bei gesprochenen u. gesungenen Ewe Texten’ in Archiv fur vergleichende Phonetik, vii (1941 ?), and ‘La relation entre la musique et le langage dans la chanson chinoise’, Annuario musical, v (1950), p. 62.

5 Op. cit., p. 455.

6 G. Tessmann, Die Bubi auf Fernando Po (Darmstadt, 1923), p. 31.

7 J. Beecham, The Ashanti (London, 1841), p. 168; Bibliotéca Canaria, El lenguaje

Page 62

INSTRUMENTAL ‘LANGUAGE’

33

element of hunting cultures1 and the flute music which represents the

beginning of programme music both reproduce speech rhythms and

modulations in musical form. R. S. Rattray2 has established that the

difference in pitch between two skin-drums used for transmitting news

corresponds to the high- and low-pitched vowels of ordinary speech.

Eboué also considers that drum language is an exact imitation of

speech rhythm3 (Ex. 175). Heinitz has emphasized the significance of

the reproduction of the ‘dynamic profile’ of the spoken phrase, and

I myself have drawn attention to the differentiation of vowel-sounds

and the connexion with the sound-laws which condition the relation-

ship between speech and melody-function.4 There are evidently also

pure ideograms such as those of the Nor-Papuas published by

Father J. G. Schmidt5 (Ex. 176). It is probable that these speech forms

originally represented some kind of secret language or language of

respect. In any case it is significant that the African Twi and Ewe do

not utter the praise-names of their gods in speech but only beat them

on their drums.6

THE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS (see plates 1 and 2)

The rhythmic articulation of time by means of an instrument of

some kind is far older than the construction of a true musical instru-

ment. Any object that primitive man happens to pick up when sing-

ing or dancing becomes a sound-producing ‘musical instrument’.

Implements used exclusively as musical instruments and for no

other purpose develop only very slowly. Many instruments (for

example, the pot-drum) are merely adaptations of already existing

utensils.

As the instruments used by primitive man have already been in-

vestigated more thoroughly than his vocal music it will suffice to

describe only the most important types. The ideas associated with

silbado en la Gomera; R. Ricard, A propos du langage sifflé des Canaris (Hesperis, 1932),

p. 140.

1 H. Baumann, ‘Afrikanische Wild- und Buschgeister’, in Zeitschrift für Ethnologie,

lxx (1938), p. 226.

2 R. S. Rattray, The Ashanti (Oxford, 1923), pp. 242-86.

3 M. Eboué, Les Peuples du Oubanghi-Chari (Paris, 1933), pp. 80 and 94; H.

Labouret, ‘Le Langage tambouriné et sifflé’, Bulletin du comité d’études de l’Afrique

occidentale française, (1923), pp. 120-58.

4 W. Heinitz, ‘Probleme der afrikanischen Trommelsprache’, Beiträge zur Kolonial-

forschung, lv (1942), p. 69; M. Schneider, ‘Zur Trommelsprache der Duala’, Anthropos,

xlvii (1952), p. 235.

5 J. G. Schmidt, ‘Neue Beiträge zur Ethnologie der Nor-Papuas’, Anthropos, xxviii

(1933), p. 330.

6 D. Westermann, ‘So, der Gewittergott der Ewe’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, lxx

(1938), p. 154.

B 3608

D

Page 63

34

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

them will be dealt with later.1 Curt Sachs's History of Musical Instru-

ments2 gives a classification on morphological lines, and the same

author has described the cultural and geographical distribution and

morphology of primitive instruments in greater detail in his Geist

und Werden der Musikinstrumente.3 In his Origines des instruments de

musique,4 Schaeffner has given a classification based on the materials

used in their construction, while Montandon has preferred to classify

them according to the method used in playing them.5 Kirby's The

Musical Instruments of the Native Races of South Africa6 contains the

richest collection of primitive instrumental music published so far.

Idiophones. The practice of beating the body with the hands or with

some object appears to be transferred very early to the beating of

horizontal tree-trunks and bamboos and to stamping on the ground.

Jumping on or beating a springy plank ('dancing tree') or an animal

skin laid across a hole in the ground is an early specialization of the

process. If a tree-trunk is split open and hollowed out lengthwise

like a canoe, the result is a slit-drum (often carved in the likeness of a

man) which is played either with the feet or with two sticks. The

ritual significance of the slit-drum will be discussed later. Its secular

purpose is the transmission of news ('drum language'), and to obtain

the necessary variations of pitch, the drum is beaten in different places

or tongue-shaped strips of different thicknesses are detached from

the side. In the course of evolution, instruments originally made

2 to 7 metres long are reduced to hand-drums and finally to wooden

bells.7

Stamping on the ground leads to the construction of special

'stamping sticks', which are used to beat the ground during a dance,

and thin bamboo tubes which are commonly used in pairs of different

length, thus producing different notes. When struck against a sheet of

water, they produce a loud and sombre sound. Another way of

producing sounds is by scraping the rough parts of sticks, tubes, or

receptacles against some suitable object; human and animal bones,

bamboo reeds, and shells are used for preference.

Idiophones can not only be beaten or scraped; they can be shaken.

Shaking has led to the construction of the extremely numerous types

of rattle. To make the rhythm of the dance audible, various small,

hard objects, such as sea-shells, bones, teeth, coconut-shells, are

strung together and hung on the human body. Rattles are also made

1 See p. 51.

3 Berlin, 1929.

5 G. Montandon, La Généalogie des instruments de musique (Geneva, 1919).

6 Oxford, 1934.

2 New York, 1940.

4 Paris, 1936.

7 Sachs, Geist und Werden, p. 47.

Page 64

PLATE I

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

PRIMITIVE INSTRUMENTS

(a) Xylophone ( 1 ); (b) Slit drum ( ); (c) Zither ( ); (d) Rattle ( ); (e) Zansa ( )

For further details see page xiii.

Page 66

THE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

35

by filling the rinds of gourds, animal skins, or clay vessels with grains

of corn, stones, or magic objects and fixing handles to them. The

rattling objects may also be strung on a ring or enclosed in a hollow

staff. Priests use rattle-staves of this kind as a token of authority and

they are also used in dancing. In Indonesia staves filled with grain

are used as seed-drills.1 Small bells made from the bodies of animals

or fruit rinds are closely akin to rattles. Only small types of metal

bells are found in primitive cultures; they are often used in pairs

connected by a ring.

Whereas plucking as a sound-producing method for idiophones

has led only to the jews' harp and the African zansa (which consists of

strips of wood or iron fastened to a board, keyboard fashion, and

plucked), the evolution of percussion has resulted in the construction

of a much greater range of instruments. These include two sticks

beaten against each other, wooden bats, and bell-like objects struck

against each other; cymbals were probably first adopted from more

highly developed cultures. The earliest forms of xylophone are also

found in primitive cultures. The prototype consists of two pieces

of hard wood which the player, seated on the ground with legs

extended and spread, places on the upper part of his thigh and beats

with two clubs; later on, two banana stems are used instead of the

thigh. Holes in the ground or gourds under the wooden bars act as

resonators. The xylophone is used not only to accompany but also

to play instrumental works in one or more parts (Exs. 164 and 169);

it seems to be regarded as an all-purpose instrument, rather like the

modern piano, for its literature includes many arrangements of songs

and pieces for drums and flutes;2 it is also used for programme music.3

Of the other percussion instruments, only the lithophone is found in

early cultures. The gong, which has been developed by higher cultures,

represents an advanced element in the later farming cultures.

Membranophones. The oldest forms are produced by stretching a

skin over a tube, coconut, gourd, or bowl. All the early types are

struck by hand only. In comparatively early cultures we find a drum

the narrow middle section of which is spanned by a handle. This one-

skin drum, shaped like an hour-glass, perhaps originally looked like

a funnel or mortar. The two-skin drum of this type was not developed

until later. The skin stretched across a round, hexagonal, or oval

wooden frame is often found in the hands of witch-doctors, hence

the name 'shaman drum'. The wooden hoop, which sometimes has

1 Ibid., p. 121.

2 Kirby, op. cit., p. 56.

3 S. Nadel, Marimbamusik (Vienna, 1931).

Page 67

36

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

a handle, is criss-crossed by strings. The skin is struck with a beater,

often made in the shape of a knife. Cask-like receptacles made of

clay, covered by a skin stretched across with strings, are always

beaten with the hands, whereas the bellied wooden drums, whose

skins are nailed on, are played with sticks. They are usually fixed

to a post or hung up on a cross-beam. Their side-handles and the

fact that they are occasionally filled with rice, suggests that the

instrument was originally used for a practical, not a musical purpose.

In the case of the friction drum, the sound is produced either by a

stick fixed on the skin, or by rubbing with damp fingers a string

knotted through it. Drums usually reproduce the general rhythm of

a song (Exs. 11, 12, and 21). But in many cases they have a tempo of

their own (Exs. 50 and 150), or some formula completely indepen-

dent of the song (Ex. 153).

The last membranophone to call for mention is the mirliton ('kazoo').

This is a fine membrane which vibrates in front of the mouth or at the

open end of a pipe through which the player speaks, sings, or blows.

Chordophones. String instruments are very little developed in

primitive cultures. Sachs derives the oldest form—the earth-zither—

from a thinned-out wooden pole, beaten with a stick.1 Actually the

oldest type of earth-zither is a 4-metre long rattan reed stretched

horizontally across the ground and joined in the middle with a

membrane, which lies above a small hole in the ground; the player

beats the string with two little sticks (Ex. 163). The earth-bow is a

genuine hunting implement. Its string, which is plucked or struck,

is fastened at one end to a springy stick or tree and at the other to

a piece of bark over a hole in the ground. In the ordinary bow (Ex.

  1. the two ends of a flexible stick are connected by a string which

is sometimes cut directly from the outer surface of the stick. To

intensify the extremely soft sound a gourd or earthen pot is usually

attached or the string is held in the mouth. The string is plucked,

struck, or scraped with a stick.

A 'reed zither' is made by taking a narrow strip from the surface of

a halved bamboo reed to form a string, of which only the two ends

remain connected with the reed. The tension of the string is main-

tained by some object placed underneath and it is struck with two

little sticks. In a more highly developed form, strings from the reed

itself are replaced by strings from other sources, stretched across a

board or a bowl. Lyres, lutes, and harps do not appear until the late

farming cultures and then very often in backward forms.

1 Sachs, Geist und Werden, p. 60.

Page 68

THE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

37

Aerophones. The bull-roarer consists of an oval or rectangular wooden board, the upper end of which is fastened to a cord. When the instrument is swung in a circle, it also revolves on its own axis and as the speed increases an extraordinary variety of noises is produced.

The most primitive flutes are made of bones and have up to four finger-holes. The mouth-hole in front or at the side is made by the insertion of a plug into the pipe. When two pipes are combined into a double flute, they are of different length. A flute in which the breath is sent not through a pipe but through a small convex vessel is very widely distributed; the player blows through a round unnotched hole. On the other hand, the round flutes made of clay, which are filled with water, are always notch flutes. The vertical flutes with notches can be divided into three types, according to whether the lower end is open or stopped or whether the stopped end has a hole through the middle. Curt Sachs conjectures that the stopped flutes, which are sometimes as long as 1½ metres, are the oldest.1 The simple vertical flute with no special blowing appliance is historically later than the fipple and notch flutes. The transverse flute stopped at the lower end has some very archaic features. It may be as long as 6 metres and it has a maximum of three finger-holes. To make a double transverse flute, a mouth-hole is bored on both sides of the nodule of a bamboo reed. In many districts vertical, transverse, and vascular flutes are blown through the nose. The flute took a long time to develop into a really melodic instrument. Its primitive forms are scarcely capable of anything beyond signal-calls. The melody is also usually very indefinite in rhythm and somewhat irresolute (Exs. 170–3). Panpipes, on the other hand, exhibit far more definite musical forms. The reeds are sometimes arranged in a single more or less symmetrical row, sometimes they are tied in a bundle or in two rows (Exs. 166 and 168).

In the trumpet family the longish tuba made of wood or reed and the snail- or mussel-shells with a mouth-hole probably represent the oldest types. In the tuba the lips rest directly on the edge of the bore-hole; the player does not so much blow as shout into the pipe. The instrument may also be made from bottle-gourds instead of wood, or, like the alphorn, from a hollow branch of a tree wrapped in bark (Ex. 167). The animal horns which are played in Africa as transverse trumpets, are also very widely distributed (Ex. 174). The oldest clarinets have no finger-holes and are often quite long. The mouth-piece is usually inserted in a gourd or horn.

Singing is often accompanied by a rattle, a drum, a flute (Ex. 173),

1 Ibid., p. 81.

Page 69

38

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

panpipes, or xylophone. The combination of drum with conch, pipe, horn, flute, or clarinet may be considered ‘classical’. Choirs are often formed of similar instruments. In the drum orchestra (normally four to six instruments) each drum has its own motive (Ex. 175), which usually takes the form of a comment on the idea propounded by the biggest drum. Kirby1 gives the following South African example of the widely distributed panpipe orchestras: 1. Four to six small reeds, all tuned to the same pitch and played by one performer. 2. Three reeds (the same pitch, one performer). 3. Six reeds (the same pitch, one performer). 4. The player has one or two pipes in his hand. 5. This reed gives the pitch to all the other pipes. Its name means ‘Weeping’. 6. A single pipe, whose name means ‘weeping afterwards’. 7. A single pipe, meaning ‘the cow’. 8. A single pipe. 9. The pipe with the lowest sound.

Ex. 168 gives a specimen of an orchestral hocket.

REPERTORY

Since primitive man sings much more spontaneously than civilized man, the repertory of primitive tribes is considerably more varied than that of art music. As it reflects the whole of life, most of it is ‘occasional’ or ‘utility’ music. Primitive man sings to call out, to play, to mock, to greet someone, to give thanks at the end of a meal. Many of the songs are improvised. Songs can even be sung before a judge; if two men quarrel or a couple want a divorce the contestants will plead alternately in words and more or less improvised songs. Whenever anything unusual happens—whether it be a boatman’s oar falling into the water or a domestic animal running away—primitive man at once gives vent to his feelings in an improvised song.

He also sings at his work. When road-making, working in the fields, or rowing, however, the working man usually confines himself to the ostinato. Often a musician will keep the rhythm of the work going with a drum or oboe instead of song; he is not thought of as an idler but as an important helper. Most of the so-called working-songs are, however, intended for amusement; only a few show any direct connexion with the rhythm of labour. A special genre of working song has evolved among ploughmen, who address their horses or oxen in song.

In love charms the magic formulas are sung. The jocular love-song does not appear till very much later. Songs which celebrate the beauty of the loved one and are often accompanied on the flageolet (Exs. 104

1 Op. cit., p. 138.

Page 70

PLATE II

PRIMITIVE WIND INSTRUMENTS

(a) Side-blown trumpet (⅓); (b) Vertical flute (⅓); (c) Conch-shell trumpet (⅓); (d) Palaeolithic whistle (⅔); (e) Globular flute (⅔)

For further details see page xiii.

Page 72

and 172) are closely connected in style with the songs of praise sung in

honour of the tribal chieftain; both types often refer in their words to

mythological events. But in the market-place even the small man gladly

pays for a song of praise about himself, improvised by a musician

in a voice loud enough for all who pass by to hear. Needless to say, all

popular merrymakings are accompanied by music and dancing.

There is a very extensive repertory of children's songs, cradle songs,

songs to accompany games, songs which describe dreams, and songs

containing riddles or proverbs. All the rites relating to birth, circum-

cision, marriage, hunting, war, weather, medicine, and death are

permeated with musical elements. Among the funeral songs, the

women's laments and the songs which men sing in praise of the dead

deserve special mention.

In primitive cultures it is very difficult to distinguish musically the

various kinds of song since there is still so little differentiation of

form. Often the type of voice used determines the character of a

melody. Funeral songs and erotic songs are often sung in a nasal

voice; love-songs are accompanied by a significant play of the lips.

In more highly developed cultures formal differentiation is usually

determined by the various layers of tradition. An archaic style survives

in animal-songs and hunting-songs, and also in children's songs,

funeral songs, epic songs, and in medicine and weather charms.

Lamentations have a style appropriate to their own nature. In songs

of praise the melodic line tends either to rise emphatically or to start

very high.

It should be noted, however, that the 'literary' approach to song-

classification is not altogether satisfactory. Not every song sung

during a rain ceremony represents a true rain-song, since such cere-

monies are very complex. They include introductory songs, mytho-

logical recitatives, interludes, sacrificial songs, and songs of praise,

and only a small part of the ceremony is occupied by the song that

is intended directly to influence the rain. In the same way, war-songs

are not necessarily intended to incite the listeners to battle; they may

also be protective songs or individual medicine songs. In any attempt

to discover the stylistic qualities of particular types of song, the words

must first be studied very carefully. The relation between the musical

style and the content of the song (i.e. the words) lies not in the external

occasion (rain, war) but in the prevailing psychological tension. If

the witch doctor implores the spirit of disease to release his patient,

the song will be friendly; if he fights it with his spear, the song will be

warlike; yet both will be medicine songs.

Page 73

40

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MUSICIAN

The many-sided role which music plays in the life of primitive races explains the personal importance of the musician. No girl wants to marry a man unless he can play on the hunter's bow,1 and any girl is particularly proud of her man if he has been victorious in a singing contest. That singer is most highly esteemed who can sing a proverb or saying at the right moment. The arrival of a musician often turns a whole village upside down, and his departure is often accompanied by scenes of lamentation, especially among the women. Scandals between visiting musicians and married women are also a common occurrence.

In spite of all that, good musicians often receive invitations from neighbouring tribes. It is also customary for the musicians to lead a village community when it pays an official call on a neighbouring community and the latter presents the singers and instrumentalists with gifts. The musicians are very often feared, for their song is dangerous. Even if a singer is punished or banished for a satirical song, the effect of the song cannot be checked. Many chieftains take singers into their personal service in order to confirm their authority with a repertory of songs of praise of themselves. Here we have the beginnings of music as a profession.

Songs often represent real capital. When the girls of the Little River Woman Society reach the age limit of 18 years and have to resign, they sell their 'Society songs' to their successors and receive a horse or a dress of buffalo-hide in return.2

The distinction between higher and lower musician appears to go back to the very beginnings of musical history. In the primitive community of the Andaman Islands everyone is allowed to compose his own songs but not everyone is authorized to recite the tribal legends.3 Among the peoples of central Asia the narrator of the tribal myths is often also a shaman. The priest-musician endowed with medical knowledge, whose songs reach the world of the gods, has a distinct role in such communities. Mythological songs must not be paid for in money; in return for their own legends, the Uitotos ask for another sacred legend.4 In the transition to more advanced cultures, musical specialization leads to the distribution of musicians among various

1 Kirby, op. cit., p. 233.

2 Densmore, Mandan and Hidatsa Music (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 80) (Washington, 1923), p. 97.

3 A. R. Brown, op. cit., p. 187.

4 Theodor Preuss. Religion und Mythologie der Uitoto, i (Leipzig, 1921), p. 15.

Page 74

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MUSICIAN

classes of society. In the Sahel and the western Sudan,1 society is

divided into five castes: aristocrats, bondsmen, smiths, bards, and

inferior musicians. The bards (dialli) are the custodians of lofty epic

art and rank as great warriors. The inferior musicians, on the other

hand, devote themselves to popular entertainment and their task in

war is to goad on the mass of fighting men with their shouts and songs.

Like the court jester of later times, the dialli are privileged to tell their

masters things which others are forbidden to say, whereas the lower

musicians are held in very low esteem. The musician represents the

spiritual world. He is the ‘blacksmith’ of song and in West Africa he

sometimes wears a costume not unlike that of a smith. In Togo the

singer (who is quite distinct from the poet-composer) carries a horse-

tail in each hand as a badge of authority. He is naked to the waist and

his robe is fastened round the loins.2

In general the musician is highly esteemed while practising his art,

because he is regarded as the possessor of a higher power. But he is

also feared, or despised. He is honoured in public but avoided in

private. That he is able to traffic with the world of spirits makes him a

somewhat sinister figure, and the more intensely a community feels

his power the more it tries to keep him at arm’s length. Since it also

needs him, it cannot banish him completely; so it acknowledges him

secretly or openly, yet rejects him because it cannot forgive his superior

powers.

SPIRITUAL CULTURE

So many writers have remarked on the astonishing unity of basic

religious conceptions which underlies all the varied manifestations of

primitive culture in so many different times and places that there is

no need to emphasize it again here. Universal predispositions of spirit

and the same fundamental observations have presumably resulted

everywhere in similar conceptions; myths, symbols, and social

organizations have been the clearest expression of these universal

ideas. The progressive development of the physical and metaphysical

conception of the world can be clearly traced from the earliest cultures

right into the Megalithic Age, and the systematic symbolism of that

age underlies the religious systems of the highly developed cultures.

Some tentative efforts to combine the now disconnected remnants of

these ancient conceptions into an organic whole have already been

made.3 An attempt must be made here to represent the specifically

1 L. Frobenius, Atlantis, vi (Jena, 1921), p. 261.

2 P. Witte, ‘Lieder und Gesänge der Ewe-Neger’, Anthropos, ii (1906), pp. 66-67.

3 Schneider, El origen musical de los animales simbolos and La danza de espadas y la

Page 75

42

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

musical part of this ancient conception of the world, excluding as far

as possible the contribution of the highly developed cultures, although

it is very difficult to separate these latter elements since, on the one

hand, the religious conceptions of the highly developed cultures

include many primeval constituents and, on the other, many late

elements have been assimilated by primitive cultures.

Music is the seat of secret forces or spirits which can be evoked by

song in order to give man a power which is either higher than himself

or which allows him to rediscover his deepest self. This is true of

'religious' and 'secular' music alike, for no distinction between the

two kinds exists for primitive man, whose whole thinking is essentially

religious or magical. When primitive man sings at his work, the music

serves both to lighten his labour and to appease the spirit of the felled

tree or the gods of the water he is crossing. It is only in later cultures

that the working-song serves a purely practical end.

It has already been mentioned in connexion with totemistic ideas1

that every being has its own sound or its own song, the timbre and

rhythm of which embody the mystic substance of the owner. Just

as the 'personal song', which develops the sound-substance of the

bearer to magical power, is not the melody itself but the personal way

in which it is sung, so here too the term 'sound' is to be understood

not so much as a clearly defined note as a particular inflexion or

characteristic tone-quality. This rhythmical sound is the clue to the

nature and quality of an object. From merely hearing a voice we know

whether it is the voice of a human being and we can even identify the

particular human being and tell whether he is happy or sad, resolute

or undecided, bold or reserved. If we strike a tree or a stone, the

sound produced tells us not only the nature but also the condition of

the tree or stone. We can also tell by merely hearing the blows of an

axe how well it has made its mark.

The mystical sound-substance inherent in all things, manifesting

itself now directly, now indirectly, exists everywhere, even beyond the

range of the normal human ear. The fact that primitive man easily

attributes non-acoustic impressions to acoustic sources (owing to the

unity of his sense-perceptions, or to the priority of his sense of hear-

ing?) substantially widens the field of the rhythmic sound-substances

tarantela (Barcelona, 1946 and 1948); 'Los cantos de lluvia', Anuario musical, iv (1949).

Recent studies by the present writer after the completion of this section have strengthened

the arguments here given. Cf. Schneider, 'Die Bedeutung der Stimme in den alten

Kulturen', Tribus (Jahrbuch des Linden Museums) ii-iii (Stuttgart, 1953), Singende Steine

(Kassel, 1955), and La philosophie de la musique chez les peuples non européens (Paris,

1956).

1 See p. 8.

Page 76

which can be grasped indirectly. This is particularly facilitated by

his psychological disposition to observe dynamic phenomena more

intensely and to rate them much higher than static ones. When the

sombre sounds and violent rhythms of a tempest convert the waves

of the sea or the bushes of the forest into the likeness of the trampling

and the swaying backs of a herd of animals stampeding down a hillside,

the Duala Negro feels that these three phenomena are dynamically

related and is at once able to reduce them to a common acoustic

denominator by a suitable drum-song. Where the same sounds or

rhythms appear, there also analogous beings are at work.

In view of the inconstancy of the world of form, primitive man

questions the reality of static (spatial) phenomena and believes that

transient (temporal) dynamic rhythms are a better guide to the sub-

stance of things. Hence he calls the same animal or the same tree by

different names (i.e. rhythmic sounds) according to its age, condition,

colour, and so on. Even one and the same person represents entirely

different beings according to whether he acts in anger or kindness, as

friend or foe, or moves like a child or an old man. The primitive

conception of nature has a psychological basis. To the primitive mind

the phenomena here called ‘rhythms’ are spirits, the audible souls

of the dead ancestors who created all things1 and in which they

constantly reincarnate themselves. They are the physical and meta-

physical reality which is the source of all life and all magical song.

In contrast to stones and plants the rhythms and sounds of which

are monorhythmic and therefore have only one meaning, man is

distinguished by his polyrhythmic constitution. The animals come

between these two groups. It is true that man too has his own

unequivocal basic sound, corresponding to the resonator of his out-

ward appearance, but since his resonating surface is not so limited as

that of inanimate nature, he is not only able to produce the sound

peculiar to his own nature but also to imitate non-human rhythms and

sound-colours. In addition, he can imitate sounds artificially since he

makes musical instruments. Thanks to all these abilities, man is able

to develop enormous power; for anyone who knows and can imitate

the specific sound of an object is also in possession of the energy with

which the object is charged. The purpose of magic is to utilize this

indwelling energy (orenda, mana, sila, manitu, kami, &c.) in some

way. The words orenda, mana, and so on denote the power of the

sound-substance which an object emits audibly or otherwise. Orenda

is the growth or the special curative power of plants, the purifying

1 See p. 9.

Page 77

44

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

power of water, the dynamic power inherent in a song. It becomes

a magic energy whenever it appears to any exceptional degree. The re-

sourceful magician gifted with special vocal powers can control this

energy because he can imitate the sound-substance of the orenda; for,

although it is emitted by spirits or particularly outstanding human

beings, the orenda is an impersonal force which can be communicated,

especially by exhalation or by shooting, to other people or suitable

objects, such as musical instruments, and then withdrawn again. It is

not confined to its bearer.1

By sound-imitation the magician can therefore make himself

master of the energies of growth, of purification or of music without

himself being plant, water, or melody. His art consists first of all in

localizing the object in sound2 and then co-ordinating himself with

it by trying to hit the right note, that is, the note peculiar to the

object concerned. He may attempt to do this by way of a rhythm in

the cadence of its original murmur, by briefly shaking a rattle or by

singing a short musical motive, thereby relating himself to the object

or spirit by sympathetic vibration. If the contact between subject and

object has led, by such musical analogy, to a mystic fusion of both parts,

the sound or the motive will gradually develop into a song. Through

the correct intonation, the spirit is held captive in the magicians’

body and sings through his mouth. But it is the song which the magic-

ian makes from the sound-substance of the spirit and the correspond-

ing visible rites that determine the dynamic and the course of action

which the magician attempts to force on the spirit. The spirit can be

localized and allured by its own personal sound but it can only be

captured, appeased, or overwhelmed by the song developed from its

sound-substance. Admittedly, the visible rites may include analogical

actions, such as the representation of the spirit by a mask, but their

essential purpose is to act on the spirit which the sound-analogy has

evoked. This activity may be expressed by the brandishing of a magic

spear or sword, but it may also be limited to the words which envelop

the sound-substance.

To understand this action of imposing the will on a spirit, it has to

be remembered that for primitive man the world consists of an inter-

action of spirits which think and act like human beings. The spirits

are conceived as fabulous beings (often in the shape of animals)

dwelling in rain-clouds, springs, crevices, dark caverns, under heavy

1 R. H. Codrington, The Melanesians, vii (Oxford 1891), p. 119; J. N. B. Hewitt,

‘Orenda’, American Anthropology, iv (1902), p. 33.

2 On localization in rain-ceremonies see Densmore, Papago Music (Bureau of American

Ethnology Bulletin 90) (Washington, 1929), pp. 154-5.

Page 78

stones, in old trees, or in bamboo reeds. As a particular spirit is

responsible for every disease and a particular healing-song exists to

cure every disease,1 the doctor, after he has localized the cave-

dwelling or the note of the spirit by examining the patient, must try

to establish the name of the spirit, so that he can name it in the magic

song. By means of a song pleasing to the spirit, by shaking a rattle,

or by singing abusive and mocking songs, he entices the spirit from its

dark dwelling-place (that is, from the recesses of the patient's body).

If the spirit appears, that is, if the doctor is possessed by the spirit, the

spirit must be forced to 'confess'. It must name its name, that is,

sacrifice its substance and become a song. Although this sacrifice is

entirely in the nature of the sound, the spirit makes it only on condition

that a return service is offered in the form of a song or a sacrifice and

that the patient patiently endures the suffering involved in the treat-

ment.

The spirit which gives its sound and its name to the healing-song

emerges from the dark cavern into the light, like sound escaping from

a resonator. All the dark dwellings from which the spirits 'look out',

that is to say, emerge in sound,2 are symbols of the sleep that brings

health and purification, of the potential concentrated energy of the

womb and ultimately of the fruitful sacrificial energy of the dead

spirits which are the givers of all life. The ordinary man and the

medicine man both receive their healing songs as a rule from a dead

ancestor who is revealed to them in a dream. When the shaman sings

a healing song, the spirit says to him: 'You are singing a song which

pleases me. It is my song. Therefore I will give you also my power.

If you will care for me, I will care for you. If I hear your song, I will

come.'3 Spirit and medicine man need one another. The shaman

receives his strength from the song, but the ancestor (i.e. the spirit

which causes the disease and takes it away again) also needs to sound

in song. By drawing the sounds of spirits from the dream-cavern and

bringing them to light in the form of a song, the medicine man carries

the spirit, becomes the singing cave, the 'drum', the 'ship', the

'wagon', or 'bird'. The usual expression for this is: 'He carries the

tune.'

In view of the fact that sound represents the original substance of

the world, the singing dream-cavern (which is also symbolized by

1 G. Speck, Ceremonial Songs of the Creek and Yuchi Indians (Philadelphia, 1911),

p. 211; Densmore, Papago Music, p. 88; Music of the Indians of British Columbia, p. 18.

(Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 90 and 136) (Washington, 1929 and 1943);

Schneider, La danza de espadas y la tarantela, p. 47.

2 See p. 49, n. 5. 3 D'Angulo, op. cit., p. 201.

Page 79

46

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

the moon or by water) constitutes not only the source of musical

inspiration but also the source of Creation. In his Religion und Mytho-

logie der Uitoto Preuss writes:

There is an inexplicable substance which seems to be a phantom and

yet exists in a form hidden from the senses and perceptible only in dreams.

The world came into being when God touched this unreal substance and

as a result of a dream held it fast by a dream-thread which passed through

the breath of his mouth. As he dreamt, he held the substance fast, stamped

on the deceitful ground, and settled on the substance which he had dreamt,

and created heaven and earth by secreting their elements from his body.1

To produce a sound, however, an effort has to be made. The bow-

string has to be stretched and the breath must impinge on a sharp

resisting edge. The ‘ground’ must be ‘stamped down’. All life arises

solely from stampings, from the tension or friction of two opposing

factors, which have to sacrifice their strength and, if need be, their

life for the birth of new life. All new life comes from sacrifice and,

ultimately, from death. Since sound forms the substance of life, the

spirits—that is, the sounding souls of the dead—are the real givers of

life and preservers of the world. The dream-cavern is both the entrance

to the underworld and the source of life. When the cavern sings or

shouts, or the cloud thunders, each is sacrificing and emptying itself,

like a fruit when it reaches maturity. But by giving their fruitful

waters to frightened man, they liberate and regenerate themselves.

When man offers his song or his shout, he purifies himself from the

overripe guest of the cave and thereby helps it (the spirit) to achieve

its full existence, to become sound. Sound is the material expression

of the mutual sacrifice that is enacted between the living and the

dead.

The experience that concentration and effort are necessary for

every creative act led in ancient Indian philosophy to the cosmic idea

of sacrifice. According to this, the world arose from the expiration of

a light-sound, the ‘friction’ (sacrifice) of which created the gods and

the stars, until it finally ‘expanded’ into matter. According to the

Brihadâranyaka Upanishad this original sound was a song in praise

of death or hunger which made all things grow or ‘swell’. The fasting

ascetic acts analogously when he offers the breath of life in singing

or reciting from the ‘cavern of his heart and lungs’. The sacrifice or

‘friction’ is the path or wagon on which man overcomes the dualism

of the world. Since the world can be preserved only by the mutual

sacrifices of the living and the dead, the ascetic can exert the same

1 Op. cit., i, p. 27.

Page 80

kind of compulsion on the gods as they exert on man.1 In the practical magic which has developed among primitive races from similar ideas, the idea of a balance between the living and the dead is much less pronounced. For primitive man the dead are always the more powerful and he is therefore not afraid to feign sacrifices to mislead the spirits, or to sing them flattering or plaintive songs in order to achieve the desired result.

Although primitive races are not acquainted with the idea of sacrifice in the strict and theoretical form in which it appears in advanced cultures, there is—quite apart from the fact that they are continually making food-offerings, performing ritual war-dances, castigating themselves and fasting—sufficient evidence to suggest that for primitive man, too, light-sound (in particular lightning and thunder), sacrifice, and an immanent dualism are recognized as the beginning of all things. When the gods were still wandering on earth they sang and drummed (= lightened and thundered) in order to create all things in the war-dance (sacrificial dance). These ‘gods’ are probably only sounds or vibrating objects conceived in the forms of human beings or animals. The Australian creator-god created the solid earth by beating the original seas with a reed. At the sound the waters divided and the death-gods came forth from their caves and created men and things.2 In European folk-lore the tradition of the beating of the water is ascribed to witches. The Marind-anim of New Guinea say that God lit a fire of bamboo wood to warm the first freezing (semi-human, semi-fishlike) creature; at the first crackling of the fire the creature’s ears were opened, at the second its eyes, at the third its nostrils, at the fourth its mouth: so man gradually came to life.3 (It is very significant that hearing was the first sense to be created.)

The father-god of the Uitoto created the primeval waters by beating the hollowed-out tree-drum (he was probably one himself).4 The first crocodile created the harmony of the world when it drummed on its hollow belly with its tail.5 Theodor Preuss has already shown that the gods are thought to have produced all created things from their own bodies and, more especially, from their own mouths. Created things are apparently released from the caverns of the divine bodies, just as sound is released from a drum or thunder from a thunder-cloud.

1 Schneider, ‘Die historischen Grundlagen der musikalischen Symbolik’, Die Musik-forschung, iv (1951), p. 113.

2 C. Strehlow, Die Aranda und Loritjastämme, i (Frankfurt, 1907), p. 3.

3 P. Wirz, Die Marind-anim, i, 2 (Hamburg, 1922), p. 185.

4 Preuss, op. cit., p. 29.

5 M. Granet, Danses et légendes de la Chine ancienne, i (Paris, 1926), pp. 263 and 326.

Page 81

48

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

Music not only creates the world; it also cultivates and preserves it. On the island of Er they say that the first settlers, the original ancestors Pop and Kod, who were probably twins, dwelt in a hollow coral-tree (Erythrina) and made a song; then they climbed down to earth and ‘had connexion on the ground’.1 The custom of promoting the growth of fruit with such instruments as bull-roarers, panpipes, and flutes is very widespread. According to a story told in the Aleutian Islands a girl raised a man from the dead by singing.2 In the language of the Ewe the word lo means both ‘to sing’ and ‘to weave’.

The idea of sacrifice is particularly marked in the cosmic myths according to which the world was created by the self-castigation or self-fertilization of a bisexual god. Sometimes the god is the god of lightning and thunder, sometimes a drum-, tree-, or cave-god. This immanent dualism is also represented by a fighting pair of twins, whose flashing swords and thudding shields produce the creative sound. The idea that this sound can develop only from fighting, castigation, and sacrifice dominates all religious music in primitive cultures. Song is a sounding sacrifice of the breath of life. Women beat the abdomen rhythmically; men beat their arms until the blood spurts. Stretched ox-hides are beaten with an ox-tail. The sound of the drum acquires magic power only when it is ‘heated’ by special songs3 or has been smeared with blood. Often, the drum must be beaten until the skin bursts. Many instruments have to be made from parts of sacrificed animals or human beings (bones or skin) in order to acquire magic power. A legend from the Sudan tells of a musician who acquired a lute from a blacksmith. But the lute ‘did not sing’. The smith said, ‘This is a piece of wood. It cannot sing if it has no heart. You must give it a heart. You must take it into battle with you on your back. The wood must resound at the blow of the sword; the wood must soak up dripping blood; blood of your blood, breath of your breath. Your pain must become its pain, your fame its fame.’4

From painful darkness self-sacrificing man reaches the joyful light, as sound enters the light of day from the darkness of the cave. On the Andaman Islands it is said that the ancestor of the tribe once crushed between the palms of his hands the grasshopper sacred to the lightning and thunder god Biliku; the creature groaned like a human being and

1 Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, vi (Cambridge, 1908), p. 19.

2 E. Ermann, ‘Ethnographische Wahrnehmungen auf den Küsten des Berings-Meeres’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, iii (1871), p. 212–13.

3 Densmore, Menominee Music (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 102) (Washington, 1932), pp. 154–5; Preuss, op. cit., i, p. 140.

4 L. Frobenius, Spielmannsgeschichten der Sahel (Jena, 1921), pp. 56–57.

Page 82

darkness fell; then the ancestor taught men songs and dances which continued till the light returned.1 Like night and sleep, music is the dark giver of power which leads to the light. That is why the cavern of night is the right time for music-making. It preserves life in the darkness and every morning is a new act of creation through which dark sound is brought to radiant light. In the mythology of the Pawnee Indians the morning star repeats the act of creation every day, by appearing as a warrior (beside its little brother) and bringing up a dark ball (the sun). Reddening, it throws the ball in the air and sings: ‘This I did, when I became angry in order that in the future the earth might be formed.’2 (Ex. 52.)

The luminous nature of sound, which in Indian tradition is based on the similarity between svar (light) and svara (sound), recurs in the creation myth of the Navaho. Originally all mankind lived in a cave in the heart of a mountain. Their light glimmered only for a few hours a day but two flute-players enlivened the darkness with their music. Accidentally one of the players hit his flute against the roof of the cave. A hollow echo resulted and the men decided to bore a hole in the direction from which the sound came. The flute was held against the roof and the boring continued until they reached the outside of the mountain. Then a wind arose which dried out the sea and the people climbed out of the cave and played their favourite song ‘Patole’. Then they built the sun and moon and entrusted the two flute-players with the conduct of these lights.3 The association of the light-producing explosion of the bamboo nodules with the origin of man has been mentioned earlier.4 Jakob Grimm held that the original etymological affinity between ‘peeping’, ‘string’, and ‘piping’5 indicated that the idea of the association of light and sound also existed in ancient Europe.

Music for worship consists in a repetition of the act of creation. Admittedly it has not the creative power which enabled the divine ancestors to call forth matter from nothing by their shining songs and war-dances, but its power is analogous and has the power to renew life. The sound produced by sacrifice or battle establishes the connexion between heaven and earth. In many legends the sky formerly

1 A. R. Brown, op. cit., p. 215.

2 Densmore, Pawnee Music (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 93) (Washington, 1929), p. 20.

3 E. Fuhrmann, Tlinkit und Haida (Hagen, 1923), p. 18.

4 See p. 47.

5 Grimm drew attention particularly to the English words ‘peep’ and ‘pipe’ and to the German word svegel which means both ‘pipe’ and ‘light’. See Deutsche Mythologie (Göttingen, 1844), pp. 706–8.

B 3608

E

Page 83

50

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

hung so close to the earth that it was possible to come and go between the two on an intervening rope (or tree). The obvious inference is that the string of the earth-bow stretched between the bough of a tree and a hole in the ground was the musical symbol of this rope. In any case, sound nourishes and preserves both gods and men. In the sky resound sun and moon, lightning and thunder, which give man sunshine and rain. The sounds of earth, human songs of praise, nourish the celestial spirits. Since heaven and earth are regarded as analogous spheres, though with opposite values, all earthly sorrow is a joy in heaven and all earthly joy a heavenly sorrow. In accordance with this inversion of values, the lamentations in which primitive music abounds serve to attune the spirits to a happy, therefore favourable, mood.

The sound symbols developed from these ideas are very diverse. Recitative bridges the dualism of the world by its psalmodizing balance between music and speech, or a tremolo-like oscillation between two notes (a third, fourth, or fifth apart). Perhaps singing in parallel seconds (Ex. 125) also goes back to the same source. Other forms attempt to reach their goal by inversion. On earth-bows sighs are produced which resemble those of the human voice. If a funeral song does not sound completely realistic, it progresses mainly in descending semitones.1 Among the Duala piercing cries are regarded as arrows, and even today in Andalusia in the night of Good Friday the saeta (from sagitta) is still sung in a high falsetto, with hands clenched. In the advanced culture of India the syllable om (arrow) (which is pitched very high in the udghita song) is the ‘nail’ which pierces the whole world and holds it together. The expression ‘to fire off a song’ is also very widespread.

The long sustained (non-rhythmical) drone also appears to represent a particular mystic force. In West Africa (Baule) it is thought to be the expression of ‘female strength’. Among the Menominee it is sung by the women to help the men.2 In the Caucasus it is associated with a melody used in healing the sick.3 Among the Indians of western Brazil a woman utters persistent piercing cries, while the men sing a solemn communal song.4 In the South African panpipe bands the drone is called the ‘weeping note’. Since the nose conveys the breath of life among the living and has phallic significance among the dead,

1 The thirteenth-century theorist Elias Salomonis still calls the semitones below B flat, C and F, ‘lamented’ notes. See Gerbert, Scriptores, iii (St. Blaise, 1784), p. 18.

2 Densmore, Menominee Music, pp. 161-2.

3 V. Belaiev, ‘The Folk-Music of Georgia’, The Musical Quarterly, xix (1933), p. 423.

4 T. Koch-Grünberg, Zwei Jahre unter den Indianern N. W. Brasiliens (Stuttgart, 1923), p. 55.

Page 84

erotic and funeral songs are often sung in a nasal tone. Piping during

the night is usually interpreted as the voice of one recently dead.

Among the Duala eating is stopped even in daytime whenever a

passer-by whistles, lest the spirit of a dead man settle on the food.

The sound of the bowstring represents a compressed force. The harsh

sound of the scraper justifies the obstinate survival of this most

unmusical of all primitive instruments since it represents the act of

sacrifice most vividly as a process of ‘friction’.

In view of the significance of sound it is not surprising that certain

sounds constantly associated with some process or other are consi-

dered the most important constituent of the process. The superior

power of the rattle-spear, the setting stick, or priest’s staff is based on

the specific noise they make. Deafening noise is particularly impor-

tant. The roaring waterfall from which the spirit of great Manitou

speaks, and any noise that proceeds from stone or iron frightens away

evil spirits because—by definition—they shun the act of sacrifice.

Noises are specially contrived in rain charms and at change of moon:

noise keeps off the evil spirits which attempt to arrest the rain-laden

clouds or prevent the birth of the new moon. At funerals the soul

(which still cleaves to the earth for the first weeks after death) is

banished as an evil spirit, until it is released from this world and

transformed by the sacrifice of banishment into a good spirit. A

systematic abstention from noise (prohibition of speaking and singing,

pounding rice, and beating down nuts) is also recommended as a

means of misleading the spirits.

Sound is regarded as just as much the substance of the powers of

darkness as their dwelling-place. For primitive races sound is a wholly

concrete expression of the spiritual world. In West Africa a series of

identical musical phrases is likened to a string of pearls. In Uganda,

where the soloist often breaks off in the middle of the theme and leaves

the rest to the chorus, the chorus is said to ‘catch’ the melody (like a

ball).1 Among the Nyamwesi, parallelism of voices is called going arm

in arm. The expression ‘to carry a tune’ indicates that the singer is

thought of as the seat, wagon, ship, or cavern of the sound.

The musical instrument and in particular the sound-box also

represent a kind of sacrificial cavern. The ideas associated with

instruments are largely conditioned by two factors: firstly, by the

ideas connected with the surrounding world from which the material

of the instrument comes and secondly, by the way in which the

1 Schneider, ‘Über die Verbreitung afrikanischer Chorformen’, Zeitschrift für

Ethnologie, lxix (1937), p. 88.

Page 85

52

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

outward shape of the instrument conditions the antagonism of forces,

thereby making the sound possible. Because of the place where it is

found, the conch is closely associated with the life-giving ocean of

death; its outward shape is thought to express the idea of bisexuality.

Since the sound-substance of the world is produced by a dual being

who overcomes (i.e. converts into sound) the immanent dualism by

self-castigation or self-fertilization, so originally every sound-producer

must be thought of as bisexual. The African drum which, in a moment

of danger, speaks of its own accord; the tree-drum which is the seat

of the deity and which beats itself to create the primeval waters; the

crocodile which beats itself with its own tail: all these embody the

immanent dualism. But where a male or female player approaches

the instrument, the immanent dualism may disintegrate into two

separate elements (instrument and player). Yet the two parts are

related like horse and rider, who always form a unity in symbolism.

By this conception of the basically dual nature of musical instru-

ments the writer differs from the view held by his revered teacher,

Curt Sachs, who tries as far as possible to attribute a male or female

character to each instrument. There is no doubt that in many instru-

ments the accent is on one sex or the other but instruments seem to

resemble the bisexual cave-god who is very often divided into two

persons and is therefore sometimes thought of as male, sometimes as

female (the god of spring or Magna Mater). If a predominantly

female instrument is played by a man, the bisexuality is maintained

in the relationship between instrument and player. The player, the

instrument, and the sound are related as father, mother, and child.

If a woman plays a predominantly female instrument, however (for

example, a drum), or a man a predominantly male one (for example, a

flute), the player acts only as the outward shape or even merely as the

technique of the instrument and the sound of the drum is masculine

and that of the flute feminine—a relationship which again recalls the

self-fertilization of the mythical dual being or of the ascetic whose

'wife' (sound-box) resides in his own nature and whose 'child' (sound)

represents his spiritual renewal.

In fact the idea that the present division of the sexes has gradually

developed from an original unity, by way of a hybrid being and a pair

of twins (the marriage of brother and sister), is already found in the

old hunting civilizations 1. Usually, this mythological figure is a

bisexual forest god or a fabulous creature who manifests himself in

the echo, in the whizzing of the bull-roarer or in the complaining note

1 Baumann, op. cit., p. 208.

Page 86

of the bamboo trumpet. He is half man and half tiger or partly stone

and partly straw or bees-wax. Sometimes he is also thought to be a

grandmother or a hunter whose bow is carried by a brother or a

mourning leopard (the transition from the hybrid to the pair of

twins). The dualism is also expressed in psychological terms when

the gloomy hunter indulges in some wild sport, killing or seriously

injuring men and then healing them and teaching them medicine-

songs. His close association with the rustling of the forest and the

buzzing of insects suggests that the drone represents one of his most

essential symbols. He too lives in hollow trees, and, as he is moreover

lord of the dead, it is probable that the bisexual forest god is an

anthropomorphic formulation of the dream- and resonance-cavern.

In order to understand the dual conception of instruments properly

the whole man or the whole of nature as represented anthropomor-

phically must be taken into account, not merely the sexual aspect.

Man and nature are tripartite beings. Heaven, intervening world

(humanity), and earth correspond to the head, the trunk and the

lower part of the body or, alternatively, to the mouth and nose, the

heart and the digestive organs, the sexual parts and the feet. The body

is often thought of as a circle, so that mouth and feet touch one an-

other. When a man stamps in the rhythmic dance, or offers his sperm,

he creates new physical life. In the sacrificial meal he mediates between

heaven and earth, by passing on celestial food to the earth through

the 'digestive fire'. When he gives his breath, his speech, and his song,

he creates spiritual values, analogous to heaven. These three zones

represent the three aspects of the creative sacrifice. They are analogous

to one another, but hierarchically ordered. A given symbol can be

valid in all three zones. In Europe this tripartition survived in music

right into the Middle Ages, when three kinds of music were distin-

guished: musica mundana, musica humana, and musica instrumentalis.

As a mere tool, the instrument belongs to the third zone. The fact

that it is essentially a sounding instrument, however, means that it

cannot represent primarily a sexual symbol but belongs rather to the

first zone (head, heaven). The player or the sound-board belongs

to the second zone. The musical instrument therefore belongs to all

three zones, but as used by man its specific task is to connect the third

and first zones. And the power to do this comes to it from the 'cavern'

of the second zone. If lightning and rain are usually interpreted as the

product of the marriage of heat and cold (sun and cloud, drumstick

and drum),1 this simply means that an obvious aspect of dualism is

1 Sachs, op. cit., p. 35.

Page 87

54

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

being transferred to the first plane. The terms ‘masculine’ and

‘feminine’ (instead of fire and water, day and night, &c.) are therefore

used below for all three zones in order to express as simply as possible

the dualism that runs through all three levels.

The conch which Sachs, too, regards as bisexual,1 is a clear example

of the dual structure and the three levels on which it is expressed.

Because it dwells in the sea and is spiral, it is thought to contain all the

seeds of life. Its role in the first zone as propagator of the breath of

life is apparent in creation myths, in its use as a call-signal, in its

ritual fixing on the forehead, and in its combination with ear and nose

shells. Its war-call or sacrificial call is used particularly in rain charms.

From the second zone downwards, it is used increasingly as a simple

implement besides its function as a musical instrument. It is heard in

fertility rites, but in libations and cures it is used predominantly as

a container. On the third plane it is closely associated with the wor-

ship of the dead, since conches are at the same time sexual symbols,

dwellings of the dead, and burial places, from which new life springs.

On all three levels the conch is a sacrificial cavity, but its fertility is

spiritual in the first zone, physical in the second, and metaphysical in

the third.

Rattles consisting of hard objects strung together, and hung round the

body, turn the dancer himself into a rattle, into the homme-sonnaille

(to use Schaeffner’s expression) from which the spirit speaks. In the

vessel form the dual structure is indicated by magic carvings (for

instance, of birds and aquatic animals) though it is already symbolized

to some extent in the combination of handle and hollow ball. The

first of the three planes is shown by its significance in the ‘cloud

festivals’ (i.e. rain ceremonies) in which each dancer wears a tall

head-ornament of feathers (representing clouds), to which a rattle

is attached.2 Its use in field and medicine rites corresponds to the

second zone, as does probably also the interpretation of spherical

rattles as female breasts.3 According to Frances Densmore a different

rhythm is beaten for every illness.4 The third zone appears to be

specially indicated by wearing the rattle in the region of the knee.

Characteristically, the orenda of the rattle is also connected with

that of the cricket and the dragonfly, both of which are creatures of

the underworld.5

1 Schneider, ‘Los cantos de lluvia’, Anuario musical del Instituto Español de Musico-

logia, iv (1949).

2 Densmore, Pawnee Music, p. 18.

3 Densmore, Papago Music, p. 102.

4 Wirz, op. cit., iv, p. 60.

5 Preuss, op. cit., i, pp. 35, 80, and 128; Die Nayarit-expedition, i (Leipzig 1912),

pp. 75 and 81.

Page 88

SPIRITUAL CULTURE

55

The idea of sacrifice which is expressed in the conch and the rattle by the friction of the breath against the mouth-hole or the grains rubbing against one another in the hollow inside of the rattle, is symbolized in other instruments by the skin taken from a living body. When the skin is stretched over a pit or a hollow vessel, a drum results. Its specific effect depends on the quality of the sound it produces, that is, on the sound of the animal or person from whom the skin is taken. The dry hard sound of a goatskin attracts thunder, because the mountain goat is a thunder animal. Cow-hides bring rain. Although the low or belly-shaped drums 'speak' (in the first zone) they seem to belong predominantly to the second, i.e. the animal zone; they are regarded as mothers, cows, or frogs and are practically simple 'caverns'. On the other hand, the skin that produces the sound is thought of as the head. The ngoma-drum of the Venda seems, however, to extend over all three zones ; it is called 'egg of an ostrich' ; the side-handles are called 'a frog's knee' ; the opening at the bottom is termed 'vagina' ; the head, 'the skin of a man' ; the smooth hairless circular portion in the centre of the head, 'a baby's fontanelle' ; the pegs which secure the head, 'the fingers' ; the drumstick, 'the hand of a person'.1 The skin of these drums is often rubbed with sacrificial foods, and sacred stones or bones of the dead lie inside the instrument. If the skin bursts, no one is allowed to look inside.

It seems doubtful whether the friction-drum represents the sexual act, as is generally assumed. Its use in initiation ceremonies in the spring and at the winter solstice and also the term 'menstruation drum' seem rather to point to puberty.2

While the low barrel-shaped drum represents fertility as a crouching figure, longitudinal instruments express it in the upright or recumbent position of the mystic dual being. Since the self-fertilization typical of this dual deity is performed by most trees, it is not surprising that the deity also appears as a tree god. The corresponding musical symbols are the springy dance-tree (with a crocodile's or woman's face) and the slit-drum. The hollow interior of the slit-drum is the dwelling of the dual deity (or the deity itself) and the home of dead or still unborn souls. It was its 'word' that created the primeval waters when the father-god beat the slit (or himself) with the drum-stick. The Uitoto connect this sacrificial act with the darkened moon. It is characteristic that the slit of the anthropomorphic drum is often

1 Kirby, op. cit., p. 36.

2 Marius Schneider, 'Zambomba und Pandero', Spanische Forschungen, i, 9 (1954), p. 13.

Page 89

56

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

found on the back, not on the front. The beating or whipping by a

power behind (that is, invisible) clearly shows that fertilization is not

conceived in specifically sexual terms. The head-hunters of the Naga

place captured skulls on these sounding ancestral figures, tree-men,

forest spirits1 or soul containers. Gigantic drums are laid or hung

horizontally in a house specially built for the purpose or they are

hung on a tree (usually in a sloping position). In this position they

have quite exceptional power because they are thought to be suicides,2

i.e. beings who have become especially powerful spirits owing to their

self-sacrifice.

Since the original types of flute were very large, like the earliest

drums, the tree or the long reed seems to have determined their

original symbolic form. Among the Tlinkit, flutes are carved in the

shape of ancestral figures or supplied with figures of eagles or fishes

(symbolizing fire and water). The dualism is also expressed by double

flutes or pairs of flutes. (In the creation myth of the Navaho mentioned

above,3 the two flutes correspond to the sun and moon.) In the

initiation ceremonies of the Nor-Papuans the lads are laid on

the drum and beaten until the voice of the spirit Brag sounds in the

two flutes, of which the male is 1·5 metres and the female 1·25 metres

long.4 It is said of the Parak flute, which holds the secret of life and

death, that it forms the veil in which the god Wunekau has enveloped

the mystery of procreation.5 The flute is primarily the carrier of wind

and breath. ‘I have reared a bird’ means ‘I have made a big bamboo

flute.’6 If the face of the totem-god, to whom the instrument be-

longs, is known, the flute is provided with the corresponding head.7

Or when the spirit is evoked a corresponding mask is held ready,8 so

that the totem-god can manifest itself vocally as well as bodily. Flutes

are also played to promote the growth of the fruits of the field.

The flute is related to the drum in a number of ways. Neither instru-

ment must be played indoors since both give rise to thunderstorms.9

Both ‘speak’ not only alone but to one another. In such dialogues the

flute assumes the symbolic role of the drumstick. This relationship

1 A. Steinmann, ‘Uber anthropomorphe Schlitztrommeln in Indonesien’, Anthropos,

xxxiii (1938), p. 244.

2 Ibid., p. 243.

3 See p. 49.

4 J. G. Schmidt, op. cit., p. 344.

5 R. F. H. Mayer, ‘Sonnenverehrung in Neu-Guinea’, Anthropos, xxviii (1933), p. 48.

6 P. A. Schaeffner, ‘Zur Initiation im Wagi Tal (Bismarck Archipelago)’, Anthropos,

xxxiii (1938), p. 401.

7 K. Koch, ‘Totemismus und Zweiklassenkultur in Neu-Guinea’, Zeitschrift für

Ethnologie, lxxi (1931), p. 325.

8 J. G. Schmidt, op. cit., pp. 341 and 666.

9 J. Kunst, Music in Flores (Leyden, 1942), p. 127; R. F. W. Arndt, ‘Die Religion

der Nad'a’, Anthropos, xxvi (1931), p. 356.

Page 90

seems to be confirmed by the fact that in later cuiltures the flute is

predominantly a male instrument and the drum female. Among the

Banoro the sexual relationship between flute and drum is expressed

in the longitudinal bisection of the spirit house. In the flute section

(opposite the drum section) of the house, the bride is deflowered by

one of her father-in-law's kinsmen.1 According to a story told by the

Mandan and the Papago a boy saw his grandmother (the moon)

take a full pot into bed with her every night, and the pot was empty in

the morning. One day he found a snake in it and killed it. The snake

(the sun) was the grandmother. The woman buried him (the grand-

father) in a lake, took the stalk of a sunflower (or a reed from the lake)

and made the boy a flute with which he could summon snow and

rain.2

The high notes of the flute are particularly effective in sexual magic

and a special style of singing has developed in association with this

instrumental sound-symbol. The special songs sung while a flute is

being made, which still survive in some European folk-customs, may

also be connected with this. The reeds which grow on graves and

betray the name of the murderer, the singing bones and the tomb-

flutes close the life-circle by letting new life sound from the sacrifice

of the old.

The power which springs from dualism is particularly obvious

where a tree or a stick has been bent by an opposing force. The easily

bent slit-drum or the sighing spirit-voice of the bow, with which the

player holds converse, arises in this way. Even though the musical

bow seems to be an earlier development than the hunter's bow, the

ideological relationships between the two cannot be overlooked.

According to a legend of the Hehe, the musical bow sprang from a

girl thrown into the water; her head became the calabash, her back-

bone the stick, and her limbs strings.3 According to a legend of the

Marind-anim, however, the hunter's bow is also a human being,

sometimes even a pair of human beings. The stick is the man, the

string the woman. When the Papuan goes hunting he conjures the

'wife' to clasp her 'husband' firmly so that the string shall not break.4

The Washambula believe that men whose strings break while they are

playing the bow will not get wives.5

The harp, which derives historically from the bow, often appears

1 Koch, op. cit., p. 328.

2 Densmore, Mandan and Hidatsa Music, p. 81; Papago Music, p. 61.

3 Sachs, op. cit., p. 63.

4 P. Wirz, op. cit., i, 2, p. 128; iii, p. 106-9.

5 Sachs, op. cit., p. 63.

Page 91

58

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

among primitive races as the retrogressive form of an instrument from

an advanced culture. It is the fish-hook of the death- and water-spirits

or a man whose back is bent with sorrow and care. Because of its

long neck it is also called crane, goose, or swan.1 With this identifica-

tion 'swan song'.2 In the outward shape of the harp, the hunter's bow,

and the easily bent tree-drum, one can detect the mystic shape of the

ship which, like the cry, the arrow, the path, the wagon, the waning

moon, and man is a symbol of sacrifice. According to totemistic myths,

the canoe is a human corpse which has been stamped into shape.3

According to other traditions, the drum is a forest spirit which origin-

ally stood at the bow of a princely ship.4 Schaeffner has already drawn

attention to the connexions between the construction of a harp and

of a ship.5

The bull-roarer also appears to be a small boat. Many Australian

legends tell of the circular voyages of the totem-gods who left their

caves after the dividing of the waters, singing and dancing with

spears, and set out to create all things. Then they taught men the

songs on which the preservation of the world depends, returned to

their caves, and turned into bull-roarers. These instruments represent

the 'mystical body' of the totem-god and renew its creative energy

as soon as they begin to travel, that is, as soon as they begin to whiz

in the air. As carvings representing the journeys of the totem-gods or

ancestral figures (in animal forms) are often found on Australian

bull-roarers,6 the whizzing of the bull-roarer appears to represent a

revival of the voice and ritual journeys of the cave-gods. The bull-

roarer which a grandfather carves out for a child is kept in a cave

before the child is born and returned there after its owner's death.

It confers on its owner the joy of mystic communion with his an-

cestors so long as he hides it from the women. It is customary to give

the sick a few shavings from the wood as medicine.7

The bow or the tree-man that has been painfully bent into a circle

or oval forms the framework of the shaman drum. It is used particu-

larly in medicine, rain rites, and soothsaying. The victim (reindeer or

horse) which gave its skin for the drum, is the lord of this 'singing

1 A. O. Vaisanen, Wogulische und ostjakische Melodien (Helsinki, 1937), p. 22;

Sachs, Handbuch der Musikinstrumentenkunde (Leipzig, 1920), p. 231.

2 The Rigveda, iii, 53, 10 and ix, 97, 8 also requires the singers to sing like the swans

who perform the prelude to the hymns.

3 Wirz, op. cit., i, pp. 122 and 176.

4 Steinmann, op. cit., p. 244.

5 Op. cit., pp. 164–5.

6 Strehlow, op. cit., pls. 1 and 2.

7 Ibid., ii, p. 79.

Page 92

bow tree’.

1

Since the doctor’s original implement is a bow and arrow

2

(medicine is ‘shot’), it is not surprising that the drum, which replaces

the bow, is also called ‘bow’ and the drumstick ‘arrow’.

Among the Shor of the Altai mountains the six ‘horns’ on the frame of the drum

are used to attack, and the six iron rings (ring-nail) to ward off,

evil spirits.

The ‘iron bow-string’ runs right across the frame and

beside it is the ‘sword’ (six knife-shaped iron plates).

3

Like all symbols of sacrifice, the frame-drum represents a way or a means of

transport by which the shaman travels to the world of spirits.

If the drum is a horse, the drumstick is a whip.

4

The skin, on which blood

or libations are poured, is often decorated with symbolic drawings

(of the sun, moon, drums, or animals) which represent ‘the whole

world’.

5

The number-symbolism of Samoyed drums

6

probably points

to a very late cultural development.

On the other hand, the description

of the drum as ‘grandfather’ and the Lapp custom of never bringing

the instrument into a tent through the main entrance but only through

the small ‘sacred door’ through which the hunters crawl

7

are probably

of earlier origin.

Since the drum is a dead man it is worth mentioning

in this context the custom of carrying the dead out of the house

through a small door that is usually kept shut.

8

A dark god also speaks out of the hourglass-drum and is even

depicted on it occasionally.

Two similar, approximately triangular

but inverted sections form the body of the drum.

These outlines,

which occur in many archaeological representations as the body of

the tightly-girdled dancer (and later, in the shape of Shiva), represent

the inversion brought about by sacrifice.

The same significance

attaches to the depiction of the waxing and waning crescents of the

moon.

The conches and the whale or crocodile jaws at the lower end

and the resonant skin at the upper end of the instrument symbolize,

like lizards and snakes, the dualism of water and fire.

In the transition to the higher farming and pastoral cultures many

of the ideas touched on here undergo considerable extension or

specialization.

They become more and more the esoteric preserve of

1

E.

Emsheimer, ‘Zur Ideologie der lappischen Zaubertrommel’,

Ethnos,

ix

(1944),

p.

2

Ibid.,

p.

3

L.

Menges and P.

Potapov,

Materialien zur Volkskunde der Turkvölker des Altay

(Mitteilungen des Seminars für orientalischen Sprachen)

(Berlin,

1934),

p.

4

Emsheimer,

op.

cit.,

p.

5

Menges and Potapov,

op.

cit.,

p.

6

E.

Emsheimer, ‘Schamanentrommel und Trommelbau’,

Ethnos,

ix

(1946),

p.

7

Emsheimer, ‘Zur Ideologie’,

p.

8

Baechhold-Staeubli,

Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens,

v

(Berlin,

1932/3),

p.

Page 93

60

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

individuals; the people as a whole only partially continue the old

tradition and usually lack any deeper understanding of it. But in the

depths of the subconscious the ideas continue to be active. No art

fascinates primitive man more than music; he is as vividly aware of

its dynamic fluctuations between light and darkness as he is of the

mysterious relationship between life and death.

Page 94

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

61

A 1. Asia: Wedda (Wertheimer)

  1. America: Tierra del Fuego, Small black Albatross (Hornbostel)

  2. Asia: Moluccas, Rowing song (Tauern)

  3. Indonesia: Kūbū (Hornbostel)

  4. America: Taulipang, Cure of the sick (Hornbostel)

  5. Australia: Yuna, Initiation into tribal laws (Schneider)

  6. New Guinea: Sialum (Kolinski)

  7. New Guinea: Kai (Kunst)

Var.1

  1. Europe: Votyak, Love song (Lach)

Page 95

62

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

B 10. Asia: Semang (Kolinski)

d =176

  1. New Guinea: Laúkanŭ (Kolinski)

Drum: etc.

  1. America: Winnebago, Song of Trickster

d =124

(Herzog)

(Cry)

  1. America: Menominee, Frog-dance (Densmore)

d =100 3

O ma-ka-ko kak-wu-na u.

  1. America: Pawnee, Song of Buffalo (Fletcher)

d =120

  1. Africa: Acooli(Schneider)

d = 69

ost. Chorus

Tok, tok cwin-yani-to lem, tok, tok do. E - ray - eel O -

po-rokagär E-li-a malame-ra! E - ray-ee

  1. Africa: Ewe, Wedding dispute (Schneider)

ost. ost.

Néyi-dá, né-yi-dá mà-vò, Né yi-dá, né-yi-dá mà-vò

  1. Torres Straits: Murray, Death song (Myers)

d =40-56

3 3

Page 96

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

63

  1. America: Osage, Song to water spirits (la Flesche)

  2. New Guinea: Bukaua (Kolinski)

  3. Asia: Vogul, Bear song (Kannisto)

  4. America: Chippewa, Owl medicine song (Densmore) Drum:

  5. Africa: Hausa (Schneider)

  6. Africa: Nyamwesi, Travel song (Hornbostel)

  7. Caucasus: Kartvelia (Dirr)

  8. Europe: Cheremiss (Lach)

  9. America: Omaha, Scout song (Fletcher)

Page 97

64

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

D

  1. America: Yamana, Song of bird (Hornbostel)

  2. Asia: Malabars, Prayer (Hornbostel)

  3. America: Patagonian (Fischer)

  4. America: Ojibway (Hoffmann)

  5. Torres Straits (Myers)

  6. New Guinea: Sialum (Kolinski)

  7. Bismarck Archipelago: Barriai (Schneider)

  8. Asia: Vogul, Mythological spirit song (Kannisto)

  9. Asia: Buryat (Stumpf)

Page 98

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

65

  1. Asia: Seram, Rowing song (Tauern)

  2. America: Chippewa, Lullaby (Densmore)

  3. America: Makûrap (Schneider)

  4. America: Omaha (Fletcher)

(Schneider)

  1. Africa: Masai, War song

  2. Africa: Wahehe, Dance (Schneider)

  3. Africa: Tanganyika, Hunting song (Molitor)

Andantino

B 3608

F

Page 99

66

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Africa: Ewe, Incantation (Schneider)

  2. Asia: Flores (Kunst)

Chorus

  1. Asia: Ostyak (Kannisto)

  2. America: Creek, Skunk dance (Sapir)

  3. Europe: Cheremiss (Lach)

  4. America: Nootka, Rain song (Densmore)

  5. Asia: Karakirgiz, Lament (Zataevič)

Page 100

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

67

  1. America: Pawnee, Buffalo dance (Densmore) Drum = 132 & 116

  2. Africa: Uganda (Schneider)

  3. America: Pawnee, Mythological song (Densmore)

E 53. America: Copper Eskimo, Dance song (Roberts)

  1. America: Copper Eskimo, Dance song (Roberts)

  2. America: Creek, Medicine song (Sapir)

  3. America: Shasta, Girl initiation (d'Harcourt)

  4. Asia: Burma, Prayer (Schneider)

Page 101

68

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Asia: Vogul, Bear song (Kanisto)

  2. America: Makuschi, Women at work (Hornbostel)

  3. Europe: Children's song

  4. Torres Straits: Death song (Myers)

  5. Asia: Pamir (Schneider)

  6. Africa: Bushman (Kirby)

  7. Africa: Bakango (Schneider)

  8. Africa: Camerpons, Work song (Schneider)

  9. Asia: Toba-Batak, Rowing song (Schneider)

  10. New Guinea: Awembiak (Künst)

  11. America: Ashumawi, Puberty song (d'Harcourt)

  12. Europe: Lapp (Schneider)

Page 102

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Africa: Bushman, Dance (Schneider)

♩ =152

  1. Africa: Schillük, Dirge (Schneider)

  2. America: Menominee, War song (Densmore)

♩ =98

  1. America: Menominee, Hunting medicine (Densmore)

♩ =116

  1. America: Nootka, Lullaby (Boas)

  2. Bismarck Archipelago: Mioko (Schneider)

♩ =126

G

  1. Asia: Engano (Schneider)

  2. America: Cocopa, Song concerning the Diver (Densmore)

♩ =76

Rattle ♩ ♪ ♩ ♪ etc.

  1. Asia: Semang (Kolinski)

♩ =132

  1. Bismarck Archipelago: Baining (Schneider)

Page 103

70

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Africa: Hehe, Dance (Schneider)

  2. Africa: Bakongo (Schneider)

  3. America: Iroquois, Medicine society song (Roberts)

  4. America: Cape York Eskimo, Spirit song (Schneider)

  5. New Guinea: Hube, Spirit song (Schneider)

H85. Africa: Central Congo, Medicine song (Schneider)

  1. Asia: Dyak, Borneo (Schneider)

  2. Asia: Buryat (Schneider)

  3. America: Makūschi, Women's song (Hornbostel)

Page 104

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

71

  1. Caucasus: Kartvelia, Love song (Lach)

=125

  1. Asia: Karakirgiz (Zataevič)

=120

  1. Africa: Hehe, Dance (Schneider)

= 62

  1. Africa: Egyptian Peasant (Schneider)

3

  1. Europe: Spain (Schneider)

I 94. America: Jabuti, Dance (Schneider)

=138

  1. Africa: Fipa (Schneider)

Page 105

72

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Europe: Cheremiss (Lach)

  2. Asia: Flores (Kunst)

  3. Oceania: Nissan, Lament for the dead (Hornbostel)

  4. Asia: India, Beggar's Song (Schneider)

  5. Europe: Spain (Torner)

  6. Africa: Sudan, Kerümbe (Schneider)

  7. Africa: Acooli, Hero song (Schneider)

  8. America: Chippewa, Love song (Densmore)

Page 106

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

73

  1. America:Menominee, Love song (Densmore)

d =100

  1. Asia: Karakirgiz, Lament (Zataevič)

d = 63

  1. Asia: Ortos, Lament over lost horse (Oost)

Moderato

  1. Asia:Eastern Mongolia (Emsheimer)

d = 120

J 108. Asia: Pamir, Love-song (Schneider)

Falsetto

  1. Europe: Cantigas de S. Maria (13th century) (Anglès)

K 110. Asia: Wedda (Schneider)

  1. Africa: Bambütti (Schneider)

  2. Asia: Kenta (Kolinski)

d =160 -192

Page 107

74

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Asia: Flores (Kunst)

  2. Africa: Bushman (Kirby)

  3. Africa: Badiki (Schneider)

  4. Oceania: Samoa, Song on a volcano (Kolinski)

  5. Asia: Naga, Headhunters' song and rice stamping (Schneider)

  6. Africa: Bashilengwe (Schneider)

  7. Africa: Wanicha (Schneider)

  8. Africa: Karanga (Schneider)

  9. Caucasus: Ossete (Lach)

Page 108

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

75

  1. Europe: 12th century (Trope) Adsit Johannes 123. Africa: Nyamwesi (Hornbostel)

  2. Africa: Wabali (Schneider)

  3. Oceania: Hūrea, Feast song (Schneider)

  4. New Guinea: Sepik (Schneider)

  5. Caucasus: Mingrelia (Lach)

  6. Africa: Kindiga (Schneider)

  7. Africa: Batswa-Pygmy (Schneider)

Page 109

76

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Oceania: Solomon Islands (Hornbostel)

  2. Africa: Chewa, War song (Schneider)

  3. Africa: Ngoni (Schneider)

  4. Africa: Ngoni (Schneider)

  5. Oceania: Solomon Islands, Kongara (Hornbostel)

  6. Oceania: Solomon Islands, (Hornbostel)

  7. Asia: Naga (Schneider)

Page 110

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

77

  1. Oceania: Raiatea, Religious song (Schneider)

  2. Africa: Bashlengwe (Schneider)

  3. Africa: Nyassa (Schneider)

  4. Caucasus: Svanetia, Dance (Dirr)

  5. Portugal (Sampaio)

  6. Portugal (Sampaio)

  7. Europe: Worcester 13th century (Hughes) Dulciflua

  8. Bismarck Archipelago: Barriai (Schneider)

Page 111

78

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Africa : Chagga (Schneider)

  2. Africa: Masai, war song (Schneider)

  3. Africa: Acoli, Mocking Song(Schneider)

Eyee wa - ci - to ka don-go bane o - lo-yi ro - bo.

o - lo-yo

  1. Africa: Sobo (Schneider)

  2. Africa: Ewe (Schneider)

  3. Africa: Ruanda (Hornbostel)

drum etc.

  1. Caucasus: Abkhaz (Schneider)

Page 112

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

79

  1. Europe (medieval): Codex Las Huelgas. Clama (Anglès)

P 153. Africa: Bakango (Schneider)

Drum

  1. New Guinea: St. Mathias, Death song (Schneider)

  2. Oceania: Rennell Island (Burrows)

  3. Oceania: Marquesas (Schneider)

  4. Asia: Sema Naga, Women's song (Schneider)

  5. Caucasus: Abkhaz (Lach)

  6. Caucasus: Imeretia (Lach)

Page 113

80

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Caucasus: Georgia, Ditge (Dirr)

  2. Europe: Codex Las Huelgas, Verbum Patris (Anglès)

Q 162. Africa : Bushman, Musical Bow (Kirby)

  1. Indonesia: Earth-zither(Brandt-Büys)

  2. Asia: Flores, Xylophone (Kunst)

with sansa accompaniment (Schneider)

  1. Africa: Ivory Coast, Hunting song

  2. Africa: Bamalete, Reed flute ensemble (Kirby)

  3. America: Bark trumpet (Alphorn) (Vegas)

Page 114

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

81

  1. Africa: Bechuanag, 4 reed flutes (Kirby)

  2. South Africa: 2 Xylophones (Kirby)

  3. Africa: Ubangi Chari, Shepherd's flute (Schneider)

(original a minor 3rd higher)

  1. Africa: Chwana, Flute (Kirby)

  2. America: Menominee, Flute, Love-medicine (Densmore)

B 3608

G

Page 115

82

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

  1. Asia: Eastern Mongolia, The blue banner (Emsheimer)

  2. Africa: Liberia, Horn (Herzog)

  3. Africa: Duala, Drum orchestra (Schneider)

Small drum

bó-lá lò-kò dí-wó í-yò =

We dance with joy

Medium drum

bó-lá lò-kò dí-wó í-yò

Deep drum

ò-ká lò-kò ò í-yò =

You dance with joy

Deep drum

  1. New Guinea: Nor-Papua, Drum signal (Schmidt)

Drum loud soft

invitation to tobacco-smoking

Page 116

II

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA

  1. CHINA1

By Laurence Picken

INTRODUCTION

In spite of considerable differences between the musical practices of one locality and another, the vast territory of Far Eastern Asia—China, Mongolia, Tibet, Shinjiang (1),2 Shikang (2), Korea, Japan, Indo-China, Siam, Burma, Malaya, Java, Bali, &c.—can be regarded, with respect to its musical culture, as a unit, to be compared and contrasted with India perhaps on the one hand and western Europe on the other. A wave of musical culture seems to have swept over China to the seaboard of the great land-mass of Asia and beyond, so that there survive at the present time, on the periphery, types of orchestras and habits of polyphonic treatment which have vanished almost entirely from the central region.

1 Recent general accounts of Chinese music are: Kenneth Robinson, ‘Chinesische Musik, I. Geschichtliche Entwicklung von der Frühzeit (Shang-Dynastie) bis zum Ende der Han-Zeit (1523 a. Chr. bis 206 p. Chr.) (Deutsche Übs. und Bearb.: Hans Eckardt)’, Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ii (ed. Friedrich Blume) (Kassel und Basel, 1952), columns 1195–1205. This account is based directly on the Chinese sources. H. Eckardt, ‘Chinesische Musik, II. Vom Ende der Han-Zeit bis zum Ende der Sui-Zeit (220–618). Der Einbruch westlicher Musik’, ibid., columns 1205–7; ‘III. Die T’ang-Zeit (618–907). Die Rolle der westländischen (Hu-)Musik. Die Zehn Orchester. Die Musik der Zwei Abteilungen. Akademien und Konservatorien’, ibid., columns 1207–16; P. C. Crossley-Holland, ‘Chinese Music’, Grove’s Dictionary of Music and Musicians (ed. E. Blom), ii (London, 1954), pp. 219–48. Dr. Eckardt’s bibliography includes a valuable selection of recent Japanese publications, and materials on central Asian music and East-West musical interchange. Mr. Crossley-Holland’s bibliography is virtually complete for works in European languages.

2 Figures in brackets refer to serial entries in the Glossary of Characters, p. 190. The system of Romanization adopted here is that primarily due to Professor Jaw Yuanrenn of the University of California. Its main feature is that the tones are inherent in the spelling as they are in the spoken word. Knowing the system, the Romanized form can be read in its correct tone, thus reducing ambiguity. Typographically this system has the advantage that it avoids the use of all aspirates, diacritic signs, and superscript numerals. Some familiar words appear in new guise: Jou = Chou1, Hann = Han4, Wey = Wei4, Tarng = T’ang2, Song = Sung4; chyn = ch’in3, pyipar = p’i2-p’a3, shiau = hsiao1, seh = sê4; Symaa Chian = Szû1-ma3 Ch’ien1, Ju Shii = Chu2 Hsi8. Again, the two types of pitch-pipes, previously written alike as lü, but pronounced in two different tones: lü3 and lü4, are differentiated as leu and liuh. A guide to the system will be found in W. Simon, The New Official Chinese Latin Script, Gwoyeu Romatzyh (London, 1944).

Page 117

84

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

This interpretation of the total musical picture of the Far East is

to a considerable extent explicit in the surveys of Far Eastern music

made by Sachs.1 Though the course of the exposition adopted here

has been largely determined by this interpretation, it must not be

accepted as more than a working hypothesis.

PREHISTORY AND ETHNOLOGY OF THE FAR EAST

China is to be regarded as a continent apart, turning her back on

the rest of Eurasia, more isolated even than India; and it is this geo-

graphical setting which has determined the main features of Chinese

history.2 Behind her natural barriers there developed a culture of such

integrity that when, in the fourth century, invaders and conquerors

came, it was they who were absorbed; and thus it has always been.

The Chinese of Tarng (3) times was an entirely different person,

ethnically speaking, from the Chinese of Chyn (4) and Hann (5)

times, because of this constant absorption of invaders from the north

and conquered peoples in the south.3

Palaeolithic sites have been found in the Ordos region, and it is

known that neolithic civilizations flourished in Mongolia as well as

throughout the Yellow River valley. At the time of the development

of high civilization at the turn of the third millennium B.C., the

Chinese, or rather, the Proto-Chinese, differed from surrounding

peoples in the superior organization of their agriculture rather than

in physical character. Even at the present time they have linguistic

relatives all over the Far East; indeed it is customary to recognize

a Sino-Tibetan language-group which includes, on the one hand,

Chinese and the various Thai languages of southern China and Indo-

China and, on the other, the Tibeto-Burman languages of Tibet

and Burma and (in China proper) of the Luoluo (6) and Mosuo (7)

peoples of Yunnan (8) and Syhchuan (9). This group does not by

any means embrace all the mongoloid peoples of China, however.

Not included in it are the Turco-Mongols of the Gobi Desert,

and the Miau (10) and Yau (11) peoples of southern and south-

western China; the linguistic affinities of the two latter are still

uncertain.

The invasions of north China in historic times all came from

1 The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940); The Rise of Music in the

Ancient World, East and West (New York, 1943).

2 R. Grousset, L'Asie orientale des origines au XVe siècle (Paris, 1946), p. 139.

3 G. Haloun, ‘Die Rekonstruktion der chinesischen Urgeschichte durch die Chinesen’,

Japanisch–Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Technik, iii (Kobe, 1925), pp. 243–

Page 118

PREHISTORY AND ETHNOLOGY

85

Mongolia or Manchuria, never from Shinjiang (Turkestan); that is to say, the invaders were always barbarians, never bearers of high civilization, such as were the merchants or pilgrims, transmitters of cultural gifts of the highest importance—mathematics, Buddhism, music, &c.—who passed along the Silk Road or the Buddhist Pilgrim route.

This pressure from the north provided an incentive to the progressive sinicization of southern China and perhaps led to the constant movement southwards of earlier offshoots of the mongoloid stock, the Proto-Chinese or, more generally, the palaeomongoloids. Among these one may perhaps include the Proto-Malay. The Japanese are also sometimes grouped with the palaeomongoloids. A number of characters suggest that they are a branch of the mongoloids separated off at a very early date; it is known that they are not the original inhabitants of much of the territory they now occupy.

Coming south to Indo-China and Indonesia, it is certain that the present ethnic complexity of this region goes back to prehistoric times. In addition to Negritos, the most ancient inhabitants seem to have included relatives of the present inhabitants of Australia, New Guinea, and Melanesia. A second and later wave of prehistoric immigrants to this region brought the Proto-Malay element, to be found in the present Bataks and Dyaks of the islands, and in the Cham and other vanished peoples of the mainland. These folk are in many respects mongoloid; their ethnological position is uncertain, but they may perhaps be placed at the base of the mongoloid stock. They have a bamboo culture, and this fact may perhaps be important as an indication of affinity with the third wave of immigrants, the brachy-cephalic mongoloids, who also have to some extent a bamboo culture. These entered across the north-west frontier of Indo-China, and it is possible that they brought with them the first Bronze Age culture to reach Indo-China. As compared with Europe this culture arrived comparatively late.

At the time of the unification of China at the end of the third century B.C., the southern limit of Chinese territory scarcely extended beyond the Yangtz (12) River. Not until Hann times was southern China added to the Chinese domain; but by 111 B.C. Annam, in Indo-China, had been annexed. The Chinese continued to dominate this region during Hann times and from then until the tenth century. As early as the second and third centuries of our era, however, the colonization by the Hindus of Burma, Siam, Indonesia, and the coast of Indo-China, had begun and reached a peak in the fourth and fifth

Page 119

86

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

centuries,1 so that from the earliest times there has been a clash of

cultures in this area.

The presence of the Ainu in northern Japan must not be forgotten

even in this brief sketch of Far Eastern ethnology. They are not

mongoloids and have existed in their present position since before the

arrival of the Japanese.

Considering the ‘continent’ of China, Indo-China, and Indonesia

as a whole, evidence points to a constant movement southward of

more or less mongoloid peoples. To diffusion in other directions may

be ascribed the colonization of the American continent: the Eskimos,

and the Indians of North and South America are mongoloids whose

affinities with the Pacific area, in the widest sense, is exhibited, among

other characters, in their armoury of musical instruments. With the

exception of a few instruments of universal occurrence all these (or

their close relatives) are to be found exclusively in China, the territory

between China and India, the Malay Archipelago, and the Pacific

Islands. Of the instruments used by American Indians 50 per cent.

occur in the Burmese hinterland and adjacent countries.2

In the light of this short account of ethnological relationships in the

Far East, it is surely not surprising to find a marked uniformity in

musical culture over the whole area, particularly with respect to more

primitive features. It is known that primitive characteristics of musi-

cal culture are often preserved with great tenacity by peoples other-

wise at a high cultural level: European folk-song, for example, retains

extremely primitive features.3 The persistence in China proper, in

spite of constant contact with other musical cultures (via Turkestan),

of the characteristic minor third pentatonic genus, with the fourth as

the dominant melodic unit, is the expression in musical terms of that

vigour in her autochthonous culture to which, at the beginning of this

section, her powers of absorbing conquerors and conquered were

ascribed.

THE PLACE OF MUSIC IN CHINESE CIVILIZATION

The views on music held by the Chinese in antiquity were remark-

able in that its essence was conceived to be not sound but a trans-

cendent power. To a considerable extent this view of the nature of

music survives even to this day. The music of the seven-stringed

zither (p. 90) tends constantly towards imagined sounds: a vibrato is

1 G. Coedès, Les États hindouisés d’Indochine et d’Indonésie (Paris, 1948), pp. 36, 81.

2 Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments, p. 203.

3 Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 296.

Page 120

THE PLACE OF MUSIC IN CHINESE CIVILIZATION

87

prolonged long after all audible sound has ceased; the unplucked

string, set in motion by a suddenly arrested glissando, produces a

sound scarcely audible even to the performer. In the hands of per-

formers of an older generation the instrument tends to be used to

suggest, rather than to produce, sounds.

As early as the date of compilation of the Joulii (13) (The Cere-

monial of the State of Jou) in the third century B.C., a system relating

musical sounds to the order of the Universe had been worked

out. Its elaboration forms part of that scientific systematization of

knowledge which took place between the fifth and the third centuries

B.C. (the period of the Warring States), after the decay of the feudal

system and at a time when the process of fusion to form states1 had

already begun. At a very early date, at least as early as the Leu Shyh

Chuenchiou (14) (The Spring and Autumn of Leu Buhwei (15)), 239

B.C., a theory was devised by which the notes of the Chinese

musical world could be derived from a fundamental pitch-pipe by

simple arithmetical operations. The orderly generation of sounds

from a fundamental by this procedure was equated with other types

of order in the Universe: with the four directions, with the categories

of substance, with the orderly sequence of the seasons.2

(F) Autumn

(C) Spring

(G) Winter

(D) Summer

This system was extended and worked out in a manner analogous to

that of similar systems in India, Islam, ancient Greece, and the

Christian Middle Ages.

In an attempt to preserve the harmonious correspondence between

their system of sounds and the order of the Universe, the Chinese

were early faced with the problem of fixing an absolute pitch. The

pitch-pipes were not only of standard length but of standard capacity,

and it is understandable that the Imperial Bureau of Music became

part of the Imperial Bureau of Weights and Measures.

The belief in the power of music to sustain (or if improperly used

to destroy) Universal Harmony was but an extension of the belief in

the magic power of sounds. As a manifestation of a state of the soul,

a single sound had the power of influencing other souls for good or

ill. By extension, it could influence objects and all the phenomena of

Nature. Symaa Chian (16) (163-85 B.C.) describes two zither tunes of

1 Haloun, op. cit., pp. 243-6.

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 110.

Page 121

88

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

magic power:1 when the first was played, two groups of eight black

cranes appeared at the opening strain; at the second strain, they

stretched out their necks and cried, extended their wings and began

to dance.

The conditions under which the zither might be played (up to fifty

years ago) were originally of magical significance, but gradually

their significance was forgotten until they became merely symbolic of

the ideal way of life of the literatus.2 In Ming (18) times the playing

of the zither was forbidden to women (though that did not prevent

their playing it), and it was forbidden to perform before any but

cultured persons. The fact that the zither became the favourite instru-

ment of Taoist and Buddhist monks meant that it exchanged its

more ancient magical associations for those of the monastery, but

that it retained at all times the power to command a respectful hearing.

The categories of hieratic and popular music are to be distinguished

in most cultures, in antiquity as in recent times, but China is perhaps

unique in the extent to which ritual music came to be regarded as an

effective regulator of the harmony of the Universe in general and of

the State in particular, so that the first duty of the Ruler was to look

to the perfect maintenance of tradition in the execution of the music

and ritual of the State.

CHINESE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

The earliest Chinese documents (c. 1300–1050 B.C.) are inscriptions

on fragments of bone recording the decisions of the tortoise-bone

oracle. A number of these contain characters either certainly or pos-

sibly depicting musical instruments, and it has been suggested that

they provide evidence for the use of drums struck by a drum-stick,

bells on a wooden stand struck by a stick, suspended triangular stones

struck by a padded stick, and a horn struck with a stick.3

Excavations on the famous Shang (19) sites in the plain of north-

east China at Anyang (20) have yielded sonorous stones (qing) (21)

(pl. 4 (b)) and a globular flute (shiun) (22) (pl. 3 (c) and (d)). The

former are L-shaped slabs of calcareous stone which (according to the

pictographs in bone inscriptions) were hung from a frame and struck

with a padded stick. The shiun from the Shang site is barrel-shaped

and about 2½ inches high, carved with an ogre-mask. Hollow, with

1 Symaa Chian, Shyyjih (17), xxiv, fo. 37 vo. Translated in R. H. van Gulik, The Lore

of the Chinese Lute (Tokyo, 1940), p. 137.

2 R. H. van Gulik, op. cit., pp. 134–48.

3 E. H. Gibson, ‘Music and Musical Instruments of Shang’, Journal of The North

China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, lxviii (Shanghai, 1937), pp. 8–18.

Page 122

PLATE III

(d)

(b)

(i)

(j)

(f)

(g)

(a)

(e)

(c)

CHINESE INSTRUMENTS

(a) Zither ( 1/2 ); (b) The same ( · 1/2 ); (c) Globular flute ( 1/2 ); (d) Two globular flutes ( · 1/2 );

(e) Mouth organ ( · 1/2 ); (f) Detail of the same ( · 1/2 ); (g) Vertical flute ( · 1/2 );

(h) Detail of the same ( 1/2 ); (i) Whistle flute ( · 1/2 ); (j) Whistle ( 1/2 )

For further details see page xiii.

Page 124

CHINESE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

89

an apical blow-hole and five finger-holes in the side, it is said to produce the note-series: do re mi fa sol.1

In many of the folk-songs and dynastic songs from the Book of Songs (Shyjing) (23)—often said to have been selected by Confucius, but probably only used by him for purposes of instruction—references to music occur specifically mentioning some of the instruments supposed to be represented in the bone characters or found in Shang sites. According to Sachs’s tentative chronology of primitive instruments, flutes with holes, and drums, such as are mentioned in these songs, belong to the middle neolithic stratum; they occur in neolithic sites and are distributed over several continents. The sonorous stones are also included among neolithic instruments. In some songs there are references to bells; these are the Bronze Age counter-part of sonorous stones.

Whistle flutes of clay, with or without finger holes, occur in China as children’s toys. One type from Shandong (51) without finger holes and in the form of a bear is shown in pl. 3 (i). In Shikang there is a whistle flute with four finger holes in the form of a frog; and there are specimens with two finger holes from Gueyjou (24) in the form of a bird. The fact that in each case the whistle has the shape of an animal may well be significant. Such clay whistle flutes are also to be found in central America and may be a legacy from a late neolithic substrate. A bamboo whistle-flute is reported to have been seen in funeral processions fifty years ago.2

The Shang were overthrown by the Jou (25) about 1050 B.C., and many songs in the Shyjing suggest a considerable increase in the number of instruments used by the Jou (1050–255 B.C.). In addition to sonorous stones and stone-chimes, bells and bell-chimes, their idiophones include the percussion clapper (chongdwu) (26) (pl. 4 (a) the trough (juh) (27) resembling a rice-pounding mortar with pestle; and the tiger (yeu) (28), with a serrated strip of wood along its back, thrice scraped to mark the end of the music. Scrapers (according to Sachs) are idiophones reaching back to the earliest neolithic stratum; there is some evidence that they have a life-giving significance as charms. The Jou armoury of instruments also included chordophones, for the existence of which in Shang times there is no evidence. Thus the first of the songs (in the traditional order) refers to welcoming the noble lady: ‘With chyn (29) and seh (30) we hearten

1 H. G. Creel, The Birth of China (New York, 1937), p. 99.

2 A. C. Moule, ‘A List of the Musical and other Sound-Producing Instruments of the Chinese’, Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xxxix (1908), pp. 1–160.

Page 125

90

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

her.' The two instruments referred to are both half-tube zithers (using Sachs's nomenclature) of which the former (or a descendant) is still in use as the classical seven-stringed zither (chyn) (pl. 3 (a) and (b) and the latter (seh) survives in a descendant with thirteen brass strings, the jeng1 (31). New aerophones include the mouth-organ, sheng (32) (pl. 3 (e) and (l), and pl. 4 (a)), two cross flutes, yoh (33) and chyr (34), a double pipe, goan (35), and the panpipes, shiau (36). (The modern shiau, a vertical flute, is shown in pl. 3 (g) and (h). Several sorts of drum, including one of earthenware, are mentioned.

From the Yilii (37) (Rites and Ceremonies), edited at the latest in the third century B.C., we have the following description of the distribution of the orchestra at the great archery tournament:

On the day before the shoot are suspended, for the musicians, to the east of the eastern steps, facing west, the sonorous stones associated with the mouth-organs; south of these are the bells (jong) (38) associated with the mouth-organs, and south of these are other bells (boh) (39): all these are arranged in order towards the south. West of the eastern steps a drum is set up; it is beaten from the south. The answering drum (byi) (40) is to the east of this; it is struck from the south. To the west of the western steps are the sonorous stones associated with laudatory declamation; they face east. To the south of these are bells (jong) and to the south of these are other bells (boh); these are all arranged in order towards the south. To the south of all these a drum is set up; it is struck from the east. To the north of this is the starting drum byi. A drum is set up to the east of the western steps, it faces south. In the space between the set-up drums are the bamboos [flutes and mouth organs, presumably]. The hand-drum, taur (41) [struck by two buttons on two strings] rests on the western cords supporting the sonorous stones associated with laudatory declamation.2 (See pl. 4 (b).)

The chyn probably had but five strings originally, the number being later increased to seven. The seh had twenty-six strings of silk-gut. The jeng, which survives particularly in southern and south-western China,3 has thirteen brass strings and seems to be a small version of the seh; it is the only one of the half-tube zithers which includes the bamboo determinative in its ideograph. This may perhaps be regarded as support for the theory that it was originally made from an internode of bamboo divided down the middle into two half-cylinders.

The mouth-organ, sheng,4 is always symbolized by a gourd (as the

1 Cf. The History of Music in Sound (H.M.V.), i, side 1.

2 Yilii, vii.

R. H. van Gulik, 'Brief Note on the Cheng, the Chinese Small Cither', Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 10-25.

3

4 F. W. Eastlake, 'The "Sho" or Chinese Reed Organ', China Review, xi (Hong Kong, 1882-3), pp. 33-41; L. C. Goodrich, 'The Chinese Shêng and Western Musical Instruments', China Magazine, xvii (New York, 1941) pp. 10, 11, 14; L. M. Traynor and S. Kishibe, 'On the Four Unknown Pipes of the Shō (Mouth Organ) used in Ancient Japanese Court Music', Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 22-53.

Page 126

CHINESE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

91

shiun is by clay, and the flutes by bamboo) and at some period a gourd

formed (and in some places still forms) the wind-chest; among a

number of primitive peoples playing the instrument today, however,

the wind-chest is made of wood, and in China and Japan it is often

made of lacquer. Thirteen or so slender bamboo pipes, differing in

length, are arranged so that each opens into the wind-chest by an

aperture covered by a free reed of copper (pl. 3 (l)). A small hole

in the pipe near the reed is stopped at will, so that a sufficient back

pressure can be produced for the reed to be set vibrating when the

pressure in the wind-chest is raised or lowered by blowing into or

sucking the mouth-piece. The reed may be tuned by weighting with

wax (pl. 3 (l)). The number of pipes has varied considerably in

China at different epochs, and among non-Chinese tribes the number

is much less at the present time (see pl. 6 (b) and (l)). They are so

arranged that the lower notes can be accompanied by their octave or

fourth or fifth. The tessitura of the modern Chinese instrument is

soprano, but it is very probable that the early forms were of consider-

ably lower pitch. It is known from late Bronze Age figured drums,

probably of the fourth century B.C.,1 found in northern Annam,2

that the sheng in use at that time closely resembled the large

forms found among the tribes-people in southern China at the

present day, and accordingly must have had a range approximating

to D-d.

Mention must also be made of the jiun (42), a stringed instrument

used by the Jou for determining the pitch of bells; it consisted of

strings mounted on a resonating table, 7 feet long.

The political unification of China brought about between 250 and

220 B.C. by King Jenq (43) of Chyn (Chyn Shyy Hwangdih) (44) was

followed by the downfall of the unifier's dynasty and the succession

to power of the Han, during whose reign extensive contacts with

various nomadic peoples on the north-western frontier of the Chinese

empire, as well as with central and western Asia and India, led to the

appearance of new musical instruments in Chinese orchestras. Chief

of these was the pyipar (45), a short lute. It is reported to have been

played on horseback3 and seems to have been a short-necked in-

strument with a circular body, four strings, and twelve frets.

1 B. Karlgren, 'The Date of the Early Dong-so'n Culture', Bulletin of the Museum

of Far Eastern Archaeology, xiv (Stockholm, 1942), pp. 1-28.

2 V. Goloubew, 'L'Âge du bronze au Tonkin et dans le Nord-Annam', Bulletin de

l'école française de l'extréme orient, xxix (Hanoy, 1929), pp. 1-46.

3 Liou Shi, Shyhming (46). See L. E. R. Picken, 'The Origin of the Short Lute',

Galpin Society Journal, viii (1955), pp. 32-42.

Page 127

92

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Jing Farng (47), Imperial Secretary in 45 B.C., devised a stringed instrument after the fashion of a seh, the joen (48), in function resembling the jiun of the Jou, for it was used to fix the sound of the sixty notes into which Jing Farng divided the octave (p. 96).

Some of the earliest representations of zithers, stone chimes, sheng, vertical flutes, panpipes, and the drum known as ingguu (49) occur in the shallow bas-reliefs from Hann times on the walls of the Wuǔ (50) family tombs in Shandong (51) province.1 On other Hann reliefs cross-flutes occur. In some of these Hann scenes the chyn is shown with but five strings.

By late Wey (52) times, that is, some two centuries after the overthrow of the Chinese empire in the third century A.D. by mercenaries settled on the northern frontier, the pyipar begins to appear in bas-reliefs as a four- or five-stringed, pear-shaped, bent-necked lute and may have resembled the gaku biwa of the Japanese court orchestra—an instrument over 3 feet in length.

A vertical angular harp also came to China in late Wey times, and representations are to be seen in the frescoes at Duenhwang (53) and on many stelae of the sixth century A.D.1 According to size the harp had sixteen to twenty-five strings and is referred to in Chinese texts as konghour (54) (pl. 5 (a)). It did not establish itself in China as did other instruments originally imported in court orchestras from abroad.

The Shoosoooin (Nara, Japan) preserves several Chinese pyipars of Tarng date (A.D. 600–900). This was an era of extensive intercourse between China and central Asia. Many new instruments and many types of orchestra were introduced, usually associated with their own dancers, jugglers, or acrobats, characteristically costumed. The size and composition of these orchestras is known from Tarng frescoes in the Thousand Buddha Caves at Duenhwang and from the Tarng histories.

Toy globular flutes with two finger holes occur in Tarng kiln-sites in the neighbourhood of the provincial capital of Syhchuan. Two specimens are shown in pl. 3 (d); both have the form of quasi-human heads. They furnish an instance of the survival as toys of ancient musical instruments whose ritual use has been forgotten.

Relatives of the pyipar in use at the present time, and possibly introduced in Tarng times, are the yuehchyn (55), a four-stringed flat

1 H. E. Fernald, ‘Ancient Chinese Musical Instruments’, Museum Journal (Philadelphia, 1936). Reprinted in Hsiao Ch’ien, A Harp with a Thousand Strings (London, 1944), pp. 395–440.

Page 128

CHINESE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

93

lute, the strings of which are said to be tuned in pairs a fifth apart;

and the sanshyan (56), a three-stringed flat lute, played with a jade

plectrum; the strings are tuned: do fa do or do re la.

To the same period of importation probably belong the various

bowed instruments, of which a considerable variety are in use in

China today. Bowed instruments are first mentioned in Persia in the

ninth century,1 and a reference to a bowed zither, related to the jeng,

occurs in a Chinese account of a Khitan orchestra playing at the

Chinese court about A.D. 900. An instrument of this kind was in fairly

common use in Pekin up to fifty years ago.2

Bowed lutes (that is, fiddles) arose at a slightly later date, and all

varieties found in China are known collectively as hwuchyn (57)

('barbarian' chyn), suggesting that the instrument came to China

from central Asia. The ellhwu (58) is perhaps the commonest form of

hwuchyn.3 It has a hexagonal tubular wooden body a few inches long,

one end of which is covered with snakeskin, the other end is open;

the whole acts as a resonator. The handle is inserted into the body at

right angles to its long axis. There are two strings of silk-gut tuned a

fifth apart, stopped by the fleshy part of the fingers, and the hair of the

bow passes between the strings. The instrument is played with con-

stant vibrato and glissandi and has a veiled tone of great beauty.

It is interesting to note that a dulcimer in use in south China today

bears the name of yangchyn (59), the 'foreign' zither. It resembles the

Persian dulcimer known as santir, but its distribution on the south-

eastern seaboard suggests that it reached China from the sea rather

than from central Asia.

HISTORY OF THEORY AND NOTATION

The writings of Leu Buhwei from 239 B.C. contain an account of

the making of the pitch-pipes by Ling Luen (60): ling means music

or musician, luen is a rule or to rule.4 The name and the person were

invented in the course of that scientific reconstruction by the Chinese

of their own prehistory which occurred in the period of the Warring

States already referred to (p. 87). There are no grounds for regarding

1 Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments, p. 216.

2 A. C. Moule, op. cit., p. 120. In relation to a number of points in the history of

Chinese instruments see T. Norlind, 'Beiträge zur chinesischen Instrumentengeschichte',

Svensk Tidskrift för Musikforskning, xv (1933), pp. 48-83. See also: F. A. Kuttner,

'The Musical Significance of Archaic Chinese Jades of the Pi-Disk Type', Artibus Asiae,

xvi 1/2 (Ascona, 1953), pp. 25-50.

3 A hwuchyn leads the ensemble in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 3 (b).

4 G. Haloun, Tocharer und Indogermanen (Leipzig, 1926), pp. 156 ff.

Page 129

94

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

the passage so often quoted from Leu Buhwei as other than a rationalization; it does not concern a historic figure nor does it

include any precise geographical indications—the terms usually translated as place names are in fact general terms for geographical

features:

He [Music Ruler] gathered bamboos in a valley on a mountain pass, taking those grown of uniform bore and thickness, and cut between two

nodes; the length of the piece being three inches and nine tenths, he blew it, making this to be the do of Yellow Bell [the fundamental of the Chinese

system].1

At the present time the scale most characteristic of the Far East (as defined at the beginning of this chapter) is pentatonic without semi-

tones, consisting of three whole tones and two minor thirds, the thirds being separated by one or two whole tones. The scale has the

form:

do re mi sol la.

The ancient names for this series, as pronounced today, are:

gong shang jeau jyy yeu. (62)

The evidence for the existence of five-note melodies in early Jou times is confined to references to the ‘five degrees’, and to the names of the

five notes in texts compiled in the third or fourth centuries B.C. The same texts contain references to the seven sounds or the seven ‘begin-

nings’, and it has been supposed that these indicate that a seven-note scale with two semitones was known even in Jou times. The first

definition of the notes is that given by Symaa Chian in the second century B.C.

The process by which the lowest note (Yellow Bell) engendered the rest of the notes in the Chinese system is also described in the writings

of Leu Buhwei: ‘To the three parts of the generator add one part, making the superior generation. From the three parts of the generator

reject one part, making the lower generation.’2 The interpretation of this passage is that the complete note-series (of which the names are

also given) was obtained by cutting bamboo tubes (of the same diameter) to lengths calculated by alternately subtracting and adding

one-third of the length of the preceding tube, so that the ratio of the length of any pipe to that of the next in the series was as 3:2 or as 3:4.

The notes given by pipes two-thirds of the length of their predecessors in the series were said to belong to the inferior generation; these are

1 Leu Shyh Chuenchiou, v. Guu Yueh (61).

2 Leu Shyh Chuenchiou, vi. Inliuh (63).

Page 130

PLATE IV

(a)

(a) CHINESE PLAYERS OF MOUTH-ORGAN AND PERCUSSION-CLAPPER

(b) CHINESE SONOROUS STONES AND HAND-DRUM

From Prince Ju Tzayyuh, The Handbook of Music (1596)

Page 132

PLATE V

(a) CHINESE ROC-HEADED VERTICAL HARP WITH 18 STRINGS

From Chern Yang, Yueh Shu (13th-14th century )

(b) CHINESE 7-STRINGED ZITHER TABLATURE

From the end of the 12th century

For fuller details see pages xiv and 99.

Page 134

HISTORY OF THEORY AND NOTATION

95

the six female leu (64), made (according to legend) from the singing of the female roc. The six remaining notes were said to belong to the superior generation; these are the six male liuh (65) made (according to legend) from the singing of the male roc. Theoretically this procedure yielded a chain of ascending fifths and descending fourths:

C D E F# G# A#

F G A B C# D#

and, if arranged in ascending order, the note sequence: F, F#, G, G#, A, A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E.

The liuhleu (66) (the complete note-series) was not a ‘chromatic scale’, but an array of all the notes in the Chinese musical firmament of the third century B.C. The process of generation described in the writings of Leu Buhwei presumably provided an approximate theory, satisfying the desire for order of those engaged at that time in systematizing the sum total of human knowledge. Similarly, the two ‘whole-tone scales’ of the male and female liuh (both leu and liuh are referred to collectively as the twelve liuh) were the result of a classification of the series into two groups by origin; there is no evidence that the Chinese musical genius at any time found expression in melodies referable to whole-tone scales.

It is certain that melodies making use of various scales must have existed before the liuhleu. The latter provided a theoretical means of deriving an array of notes, any one of which (again in theory) could act as do (that is, gong) in the five-note series. A pentatonic scale has five loci of modal inversion: that is, the series may begin (and end) on each of the five notes in turn, giving five modes. Each mode takes the name of the note which is finalis, which ends melodies in that mode. It is probable that the fact that different melodies were in different modes had been recognized at a very early date, and that transposition of the modes, changing the liuh selected as tonic, was practised.

Obviously, variation in the unit of length on which the length of the fundamental pitch-pipe was based at different times must have meant that absolute pitch was never attained. Under the Jou the minimal length of the Yellow Bell pipe is estimated to have been 20 centimetres. Europeans have accepted pitches of F (Amiot), E (Courant), D (van Aalst), E (Mahillon).1 For convenience the value of F will be adopted here.

The fact that so many of the liuhleu bear the name of jong (bell) suggests that part of the original note-series may have been a set of

1 For references see Bibliography, pp. 482-3.

Page 135

96

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

bells (like the celestas or kettle-gong chimes in the Balinese orchestra).

It is known that by 500 B.C. bells were cast in sets of six or seven

members bearing, in some cases, names similar to those of bells in the

liuhleu series. It is also possible that the names of the liuhleu were

originally applied to a note-series differing from the liuhleu of Leu

Buhwei.

Hann Dynasty (206 B.C.-A.D. 220) to Swei Dynasty (581–618)

While references in Hwainantzyy (67) suggest that a scale of seven

notes was known in the second or first century B.C., there can be no

doubt as to its use in the time of Jing Farng in 40 B.C.; nor can there

be any doubt about the practice of transposition. Jing Farng gives

an exact definition: ‘At the Winter solstice one takes F (Yellow Bell)

as do, G as re, A as mi, C as so, D as la, E as si (becoming do) and

B as fe (becoming so), as the notes of the scale. Since the liuh(s)

corresponding to the day act in turn as the fundamental, re and so

follow (the fundamental) in accordance with their nature.’1

It was under the Hann emperor Wuudih (68) (141–87 B.C.) that the

Imperial Bureau of Music (Yuehfuи) (69) was founded. This was

responsible for supervising rites, ceremonies, and music of all kinds

(foreign, court, and folk-music); for preparing archives of national

melodies; and for establishing and maintaining the correct pitch of

the liuhleu. In an attempt to bring the last note in the cycle of the

liuh nearer to coincidence with the octave of the fundamental, Jing

Farng in 40 B.C. increased the number of liuh from 12 to 60. But even

when continued through five cycles, the twelfth fifth of the fifth

cycle would still differ from the octave of the fundamental—always

supposing that a stringed instrument such as Jing Farng used (the

joen) could be made to produce accurately the sixty theoretical liuh.

That some notation or tablature existed in early Hann times is clear

from the beginning of the story, already referred to (pp. 87–88) of

Duke Ling (70) of Wey, recounted by Symaa Chian. Ling heard a zither

tune played by spirits and requested his music master, Jiuan (71), to

write it down for him. Jiuan did so and asked for time to practise it.

Symaa Chian, writing in the second century B.C., was therefore fami-

liar with some method of zither notation.

The decay of the practice of ritual transposition during the next

three or four hundred years may perhaps be correlated with the dis-

turbed state of the empire during the period of the Three Kingdoms.

1 Maurice Courant, ‘Essai historique sur la musique classique des Chinois’ in

Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913),

p. 94.

Page 136

HISTORY OF THEORY AND NOTATION

97

Not until the Swei (72) dynasty (581-618) do we again find explicit reference to transposition in relation to the lunar calendar.

In the early part of the sixth century a further theoretical extension of the series of liuh took place, the cycle of fifths being extended to 360 liuh; but while some attempt seems to have been made to put into practice the system of Jing Farng, the system of 360 liuh was undoubtedly of theoretical interest only.

In 587, Jenq Yih (73), Duke of Peh (74), in a memorial on the subject of ancient and contemporary musical practice, showed how to vary the tuning of the pyipar ('twisting the string-posts', that is, the tuning-pegs) so as to extend the range available, and make 'twelve yunn corresponding to the twelve liuh'; and the subsequent formation of eighty-four systems by transposition, each of the twelve liuh serving as initial.1 The term 'system' (diaw) (75) includes both mode and key in the Western sense; that is to say, for the Chinese as for the Greeks the notion of a change of mode and a change of pitch were inseparable. The twelve keys (F, F#, G, G#, A, A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E) are known in Chinese as the twelve yunn (76); the seven modes are the seven diaw (the seven different kinds of systems) and this expression is identical with that used for the total number of different systems (scales in the Western sense) possible, 12 × 7 = 84 diaw. If this appears confusing, it is so even to the Chinese. This is due to the confusion between a change in key and a change in mode, which arises because on an instrument with a fixed scale (a bell-chime, for example), a change in mode must also mean a change in pitch, that is a change in key. In due course the proposal made by Jenq Yih was accepted, the legitimacy of the seven-note scale was recognized, and the practice of transposition was re-established, although this did not receive imperial favour and take effect until the next dynasty, that of the Tarng.

Tarng Dynasty (618-907)

In 628, the emperor Taytzong (77) approved the eighty-four systems: the seven notes from below upwards 'form a scale: yunn. In general, the twelve systems of do (that is the do mode in its twelve keys) all have the true fundamental, they have no sound lower than the fundamental. . . . The twelve systems of re all contain a note lower than the initial, this is the fundamental. The twelve systems of mi have two notes lower than the initial; these are the fundamental

1 Courant, op. cit., p. 96, mistranslates. For further discussion of central Asian influence in Chinese music see H. G. Farmer, 'Reciprocal influences in music twixt the Far and Middle East', Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1934), pp. 327-42.

B 3608

H

Page 137

98 THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

and re.'1 Each liuh starts a scale of the type: F, G, A, B, C, D, E, F, and each of these twelve scales is called a yunn. Each liuh also acts as each degree of the standard scale in turn, forming the initial to seven systems (modes in the Western sense) known as diaw. Sixty of the diaw are principal systems founded on the five points of modal inversion corresponding to the five-note scale; the remaining twenty-four are complementary systems founded on the auxiliary notes. The different systems are defined by naming the liuh which is do, followed by the degree which names the mode. Thus ‘Yellow Bell (F) do’ is the do mode on F, that is, with F as initial (and fundamental); ‘D# re’ is the re mode on D#, that is, with D# as fundamental (do) and re of the scale of D sharp (E#) as initial.

A single Tarng music manuscript has been found in the famous Thousand Buddha Caves at Duenhwang.2 It includes ‘Emptying-the-cup Music’ and is apparently written in a tonal notation, some elements of which are indistinguishable from numerals. This notation has not as yet been deciphered. It has affinity with the Sonq (78) notation used by Jiang Kwei (79) (p. 109) and with that of Ju Shii (80) and other Sonq writers, as well as with the gaku biwa notation of the Japanese court orchestra (p. 147). The structure of this composition will be considered later (p. 105). A tune of this name is mentioned in the section on rites and music in the Tarng History (190).

Song (960–1126) and Southern Sonq (1127–1279) Dynasties

From the end of the ninth century onwards, the imperial music again fell into disorder, and a statement made in 959 reveals that only seven notes, forming the Yellow Bell scale, are in use; the other eighty-three systems have disappeared. Of many hundreds of melodies in the eighty-four systems only nine survived and all of these were attributed to Yellow Bell (F) do. During the decline of the Sonq, the invading Tartars were practising a simplified version of Tarng ritual music, basing their tuning on the pyipar. The Jin (81), who conquered the Sonq, made use of a set of twelve hymns for all ritual circumstances, comparable to the twelve hymns of the Tarng. In the thirteenth century the Mongol invaders were again practising ritual transposition.

In addition to the pyipar notation already mentioned, the Sonq

1 Courant, op. cit., p. 97.

2 Bibliothèque nationale de France; Collection Pelliot, No. 3808 vo. Professor In Faaluu of Pekin National University possesses a photographic copy which I have examined and of which I possess a written copy.

Page 138

HISTORY OF THEORY AND NOTATION

99

poet and musician, Jiang Kwei,1 made use of another notation, probably of very great antiquity, namely that of the names of the liuh. In four of his songs he also uses two notes sharpened by one or two commas, thereby extending the scale to nine notes (p. 110). In all cases the fractional tones are approached from, and quitted for, the note below, so that they are heard as a microtonal sharpening of two of the notes of a seven-note scale.

Jiang Kwei is also the first composer for the seven-stringed zither whose work survives in a contemporary tablature (pl. 5 (b)). This is based on these principles: each string is represented by one of the numerals from one to seven (82); the action of the right hand—whether the string is plucked with a forward or a backward motion, and which of the fingers 1–4 is performing the operation—is indicated by abbreviated characters written over, under, or embracing the number of the string concerned; the string may be open—indicated by an abbreviated character written over the complex—or stopped, in which case the finger of the left hand doing the stopping, and the point of stopping in relation to the nodes of the string, are indicated; the position adopted when playing harmonics is indicated by a prefatory character, as is the return to the usual position. The tablature of Jiang Kwei differs from that in use today in the very restricted use of ornaments and of ligatures, both of which are produced by shifting the position of stopping after the string has been set in motion. Jiang Kwei’s tablature is transcribed and the work described on p. 111.

The notation most widely used for flute music and songs, up to the end of the empire and the founding of the republic in 1912, first appeared in China in Song times. Ju Shii makes use of this notation, taken from books of popular music, and equates it with the other Song notation already referred to, possibly developed for the pyipar.

Yuan Dynasty (84) (1271–1368)

In the first Mongol dynasty of the Yuan, the ritual music was carefully preserved and the practice of transposition cultivated. It was under this dynasty that the diatonic major scale was introduced into China as the main mode, and it is in the flute notation associated with this scale that all music of the theatre is written to this day. The characters for the note-series: c′ d′ e′ f′ g′ a′ b′ c″ d″, are given in the Glossary of Characters (84a); alternative forms are omitted.

In the latter part of the Yuan dynasty, and from the rise of the

1 Bairshyr Dawren Gechcu, Syhbuh Tsongkan (83) (Shanghai, 1929).

Page 139

100

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ming onwards, the practice of ritual transposition again fell into disuse.

Ming Dynasty (1368-1628)

During the Ming dynasty there appeared what is perhaps the most remarkable of Chinese theoretical works on music: The Handbook of Music (85),1 by Prince Ju Tzayyuh (86) of the house of Jenq (87). This work, running into nineteen volumes, is a complete survey of music, dance, and ritual in ancient China. It attempted a reconstruction of the music of Jou times, providing full scores of many ritual hymns, and proposed an equal-tempered chromatic scale a hundred years before Werckmeister made the same proposal in Europe. Not content with establishing a just scale, Ju Tzayyuh reached the concept of equal temperament and succeeded in calculating values for the length and diameter of a series of equally tempered liuh: an equal-tempered chromatic scale of two octaves.

This dynasty saw the publication of superb collections of zither tunes in tablature.2 The number of abbreviated characters in use had increased considerably from Sonq times, judging by the single example of Sonq tablature from Jiang Kwei. This was due to the development of the finger technique and to the increased use of ornaments and ligatures of various kinds.

Ching Dynasty (88) (1644-1911)

At the beginning of the eighteenth century, in the reign of Kangshi (89), the ritual music was restored, and the practice of transposition reintroduced. It was also at this time, Tzayyuh forgotten, that the octave was divided into fourteen steps, in an attempt to combine the process of derivation through the cycle of fifths with the octave standard. This scale differed from that of the flutes and chimes on the one hand and of the stringed instruments on the other, and the official melodies of the Ching cannot be played on an equal-tempered keyboard instrument without gross distortion.

At the present time, the ritual music survives only, if at all, in the Confucian temple at the home of Confucius at Cheufuh (90). Knowledge of the systems has decayed until a majority of the melodies in the modern repertoire of the seven-stringed zither are in the do mode on F. Even among zither players, who as a class are knowledgeable in the old music, confusion exists between a tuning, a key, and a mode.

1 Yuehliuh Chyuanshu (85).

2 R. H. van Gulik, op. cit., p. 85.

Page 140

HISTORY OF THEORY AND NOTATION

101

In addition to staff notation imported from the West, the Chinese

also make use of a sort of sol-fa system developed by the Japanese,

representing the notes of the diatonic scale by the numerals 1–7. For

homophonic music this is typographically simpler than staff notation.

Practically all collections of popular songs published in the past ten

years in China have been written in this notation. The first four bars

of Ex. 209 (p. 127) would be written as follows:

5|5 65 4 42|5 0 45|5 65 4 42|5 0

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

Jouard Chyn Dynasties (before 206 B.C.)

No specimens of music survive in any text earlier than Tarng times,

so that our knowledge of early and late Jou music is limited to

descriptions of orchestras, names of songs associated with a particu-

lar ritual or with particular occasions, &c. A passage from the Shujing

(91), the Canon of Documents, provides support for the view that

Chinese music was essentially ‘logogenic’ in character at a time con-

siderably earlier than the period of classical opera, in describing which

Sachs makes use of this term.1 In Shuenn’s Code (92) we read: ‘Poetry

expresses the will; song prolongs the expression; music depends on

the prolongation.’ In a subsequent chapter2 we are given some idea of

the nature of ritual music:

Kwei [the director of music] said, when the sonorous stones are struck

lightly or heavily, when chyn and seh are struck lightly or heavily, and their

sounds alternate with human voices, the spirits of the ancestors come: the

guest of Yu [the emperor Shuenn] takes his place, the crowd of princes

display their virtue in mutual courtesy. Down below, the flutes [double

vertical flutes] and the small drums play together as soon as the signal is

given by the wooden trough and cease as soon as the signal is given by the

tiger-scraper. The mouth-organs and the bells play in the intervals.

Prince Tzayyuh, writing before 1595, chose the ‘Hymn for the

Sacrifice to Confucius’, as played in the sixteenth century, to illustrate

the ancient practice of transposition. The melody dates from the four-

teenth century and may retain something of the character of the cor-

responding hymn performed in Tarng times. To suppose, as did

Tzayyuh, that it represents the music of the Jou, 2,000 years before

his time, would appear unwise. The hymn illustrates not only trans-

position into five keys other than the initial key (each key being one

1 The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 137.

2 Shujing, Yushu Yihjyi (93).

Page 141

102

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

tone higher than the preceding key) but also the constant distance of

a fourth between the accompanying orchestra and the voices. By a

brilliant emendation of a passage from the Joulii which, though it

made cosmological sense as it stood, made no musical sense, Tzayyuh

produces the following formula: ‘The instruments play in F, the chant

is in A sharp . . . for the sacrifice to the celestial spirits. For the sacri-

fice to the terrestial spirits the instruments play in G, the chant is in

C. . . .'1 Sachs points out the similarity of this practice to that of one

type of medieval organum: the organum (originally an instrument)

accompanied the cantus at the fourth or fifth below.

Ex. 177

This is the first stanza of the hymn quoted by Tzayyuh; the bar

lines mark the ends of the four-word lines and the commas mark the

rhymes. In this type of transposition the melody is transposed in the

Western sense, without change in mode. But Tzayyuh also gives an

example of transposition involving a change in mode as well as in

pitch. While the evidence that the Jou did anything of the kind is

slender, the effect is enchanting, as the following example shows. It

is the ‘Hymn for the Sacrifice to the Imperial Ancestors’, first in its

original form (do mode on F) and then in the first modal transposition

(mi mode on D):2

Ex. 178

Ex. 179

1 Courant, op. cit., p. 102.

2 Ibid., pp. 114, 115.

Page 142

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

103

One of the most remarkable aspects of the work of Tzayyuh is his reconstruction of the orchestral accompaniment to the ritual melodies, based on his own interpretations of ancient texts and on those of the Sonq Confucian philosopher, Ju Shii. Of this reconstruction perhaps the most brilliant feature is the elucidation of the ancient practice of prolonging a note, on plucked stringed instruments (such as chyn and seh) whose sound quickly decays, by means of a rapidly executed figuration-the procedure known as tsawmann (94). In a phrase used by performers of his day to tune their instruments, the Prince discovered what he believed to be the vestiges of the old tsawmann: the intervals of the octave and the fifth were played in succession to words meaning ‘the moon is bright, the wind is soft’. The following example sets out in score the opening line of the second stanza of the ‘Hymn from the Temple of the Ancestors’. The figuration differs in minor details from that given by Courant, and the mouth-organ part has been converted into chords of octave and fifth or fourth. The pitch of the mouth-organ may well be an octave lower than that at which it is written.1

Ex. 180

In addition to the ritual orchestra already described, there was a military orchestra, which included many varieties of drums, bells, and cymbals; this was also used in various exorcistic rites.

Hann Dynasty (202 B.C.–A.D. 220)

The imperial orchestra of Hann times comprised four different

1 G. E. Moule, ‘Notes on the Ting-chi, or half-yearly sacrifice to Confucius’, Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xxxiii (Shanghai, 1901), pp. 37–73, may be consulted for an account of the Confucian ritual as it survived at the turn of the century.

Page 143

104

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

sections and employed more than 800 musicians. A great increase in

the number and variety of drums in use as compared with the previous

dynasty is to be noted; their designation by local names suggests that

regional music was played.

During this period occurred the first stages in the evolutionary pro-

cess which led finally to the development of Chinese opera. As in the

evolution of Greek drama, a performance originally of religious and

even of magical significance came to be repeated for the sake of its

value as entertainment. In Jou times there had existed a ceremony of

exorcism performed by a wizard, the fangshiang (95): this consisted

in dances and songs executed by a troop of performers masked as

animals and led by the wizard. It was made use of on two occasions:

in the annual nuo (96) ceremony for driving away disease; and at

funerals, to drive away the ghost. In Hann texts there appears for

the first time the expression koeileei (97) used, apparently, as a

synonym for fangshiang, and this term survives to the present

(though written with graphic variants) as a term for marionettes of

all kinds (98). What is unusual in the history of the Chinese theatre

is the importance of the puppet theatre as an intermediate step

between ceremony and entertainment by human actors.1 In Hann

times the musical accompaniment for the fangshiang-koeileei per-

formance of the gentry probably consisted of an orchestra of strings,

flute, and handbells. The strings were chyn, seh, pyipar, and jeng,

and the flute was a vertical flute, shiau (99). This was the band used

for military and general purposes in the Court. The shiau and hand-

bells were lacking from the popular orchestra, however, which in-

cluded the mouth-organ and the cross-flute, dyi (100). It seems

probable that in the transformation of the koeileei from an exorcistic

ceremony to an entertainment of songs, dances, and music, there

was also a change in the status of its music from that of the court

to that of the common people.

Tarng Dynasty (618-907)

The only specimen2 of Tarng music supposedly transcribed from a

contemporary document, and having some claim to be regarded as

authentic, is the melody for the first song in the Book of Songs, printed

by Prince Tzayyuh in 1596. According to Tzayyuh the melody was

taken from the edition of the classics engraved on stone in the ancient

1 Souen K'ai-ti, 'L'origine et le développement du théâtre des marionnettes chinoises';

Bulletin du centre franco-chinois d'études sinologiques, i (Pekin, 1944), pp. 81–105

(summary in French) (194).

2 The melodies preserved by Ju Shii may perhaps be included here. See p. 109.

Page 144

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

105

capital, Shi An (101), in Tarng times. Engraving began in 835 and was

finished in 837.1

This melody is one of those which Tzayyuh scores for drum, clap-

per, seh, sonorous stones, and voice. Another score is for voice, chyn,

seh, two sorts of bells, sonorous stones of two kinds, clapper, mortar,

tiger, drum, and small drum. The tune is remarkable in that it con-

stantly avoids re but makes frequent use of both the auxiliary notes,

fe and si. The chords supplied by Tzayyuh use only notes in the mode.

Each four-syllable line of the poem is separated from the next by two

bars of percussion, and there are 3½ bars of percussion at the end of

each of the five stanzas. The first stanza only is quoted here. In

Waley's translation the text runs:

'Fair, fair', cry the ospreys

On the island in the river,

'Lovely is this noble lady,

Fit bride for our lord'.2

The mode is mi on F. The voice sings the top part.

Ex. 181

An indisputably authentic relic of Tarng music survives in the

manuscript from the Thousand Buddha Caves at Duenhwang already

referred to (p. 98). From external features this is a suite in eight move-

ments, headed as follows: 'Emptying-the-Cup Music; another slow

tune; another tune; quick tune; another tune; another slow tune;

quick tune; another slow tune.' These terms may well have a technical

significance.3 With the exception of the first section ('Emptying-the-

Cup Music') and the last, each movement includes a repeat and a

1 Professor E. G. Pulleylblank, Professor of Chinese Language and History in the

University of Cambridge, has recently (November 1954) examined the stone-engraved

ninth-century text of the Book of Songs in Shi An on my behalf. He reports that there is no

trace of notation on the stones. This discrepancy between Prince Tzayyuh's ascription

and the surviving stone-text at Shi An has also been noted by Professor Yang Inliou of

the Central Institute for Musicological Research, Pekin. Thus the authenticity of Prince

Tzayyuh's 'Tarng' melody remains unconfirmed.

2 A. Waley, The Book of Songs (London, 1937), p. 81.

3 This is undoubtedly the case for the term here translated as 'quick', which survives

as a designation for final movements in the suites that form part of the repertoire of the

Imperial Musicians of the Japanese Court (p. 147). (See H. Tanabe, Nihon Ongaku

Kōwa (Tokyo, 1926), pp. 534 ff.). It would be of the greatest interest to compare the

surviving part-books of the Japanese versions of the 'Emptying-the-Cup Music' with the

Tarng manuscript.

Page 145

106

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

coda. In the Tarng History this work (or a work with this title) is

specifically referred to as a dahcheu (102) and is said to consist of at

least ten movements.

The structure of this work corresponds to some extent with what

is known from other sources of the structure of the ‘extended

melody’ (dahcheu) of Tarng and Sonq times.1 These orchestral com-

positions consisted of a number of movements (piann) (103), each of

which might be divisible into several subsections. The character of

these varied in the different types of dahcheu. The Tarng poet, Bair

Jiuyih (Po Chü-I) (105) refers to: ‘free prelude’, ‘middle prelude’,

and poh (106) or ‘broaching the theme’. Some types include as many

as twelve different movements. This structure has been compared

with that of the suite in western Europe; but a more direct comparison

would seem to be with the structure of Indian rāgas, with the Turkish fasıl, and with the nūba, as it survives in Morocco and Algeria.2

With regard to this last type of composition, it is interesting to note

that the dahcheu occasionally included vocal movements. It is surely

not without significance that the extended melodies of the seven-

stringed zither repertoire are always referred to today as dahcheu. As

we shall see, their structure offers points of resemblance to the struc-

ture of Tarng and Sonq dahcheu as inferred from literary sources, and

it is reasonable to suppose that the zither compositions of the present

day, lasting twenty to thirty minutes, echo an instrumental form

which flourished from the seventh to the twelfth centuries.

From the period of the northern Chyi (107) (550–77) to the end of

the Tarng (905), the music current in court circles on all but state

occasions was known as hwuyueh (108): barbarian music. The fact

that this foreign music was associated with the life of the court makes

it improbable that the foreign styles had as yet become current among

the people, though some influence cannot be excluded even at this

early date. Since the popular music was essentially secular, it is not

described in any of the records; but it seems probable that the musical

accompaniment of the koeileei performances in Tarng times was a

survival of the court military orchestra of Hann and Wey times.3

The Tarng emperor Shiuanzong (109) (713–55) maintained a troop

of 300 actors, founded by himself in 714 and referred to as the Pear

Garden; and to this period are traditionally ascribed certain melodies

1 In Faaluh, ‘Tarng-Sonq Dahcheu jy Laiyuan jyi chyi Tzuujy’, Wuuchang Hwajong

Dahshyue Gwoshye Yanjiou Luennwen Juankan, i. 4 (Dahlii, 1945) (104).

2 See p. 98 and Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 290. A comparison

with the Turkish fasıl is in some respects closer than with the pešrev, instanced by Sachs.

3 Souen K’ai-ti, op. cit.

Page 146

still current in the Chinese theatre. The following example is part of a

duet with accompaniment for cross flute, drum, and gong, transcribed

from a gramophone record and ascribed to Shiuantzong himself.1 It

occurs in the opera, The Little Shepherd:

Ex. 182

The purely pentatonic character of this and other operatic melodies

has been regarded as evidence of their antiquity, but as the examples

of the Tarng (?) melody '“Fair, fair”, cry the ospreys' and the Sonq

melodies of the next section show, it is questionable whether any such

deduction is legitimate. One would not expect the music of the Court

of the time of Shiuantzong to be purely pentatonic. On the other hand

such a melody might well be an echo of the popular koeileei music of

1 G. Soulié de Morant and A. Gailhard, Théâtre et musique modernes en Chine

(Paris, 1926), p. 134. See M. Granet, Fêtes et chansons anciennes de la Chine (Paris, 1919)

for commentary and translation. A slightly different version of Ex. 182 is

recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 2 (c).

Page 147

108

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Tarng times, which indeed seems to have provided the basis for the development of classical opera (largely pentatonic) in Sonq times.

TABLE SHOWING THE COMPOSITION OF VARIOUS TARNG ORCHESTRAS

(after In Faaluu, op. cit.)

Instruments

Sonorous stones

Stone-chimes

Bells

Bell-chimes

Iron chimes

Conches

Copper horns

Long vertical flutes

Short vertical flutes

Cross flutes

Chyr flutes

Free reeds

Other reeds

Halftube- and board-zithers

Lutes

Vertical harps

Drums

The number of each sort of instrument used is shown in the appropriate column. Where a figure in brackets is given, this is the number of each of as many kinds of instrument as are shown by the number outside the bracket. Thus, under ‘Drums’, the Jioutzy orchestra contained one of each of 8 different types of drum; this is indicated in the form: 8(1). The category ‘Other reeds’ includes both oboe- and clarinet-type reeds.

Though practically nothing of the music of Tarng times has survived, a great deal is known from contemporary accounts of the nature of the orchestras employed in the palace, the number of performers taking part, the costumes they, and the dancers and jugglers associated with particular orchestras, wore, and the names of the melodies they playeded.1 The composition of these orchestras has recently been reviewed2 and the table above is modified from a table

1 H. Trefzger, ‘Das Musikleben der Tang-Zeit’, Sinica, xiii (Stuttgart, 1938). See also Courant, op. cit., p. 192, Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 150, and Waley, The Life and Times of Po Chü-I (London, 1949), pp. 150–5. 2 In Faaluu, op. cit.

Page 148

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

109

in this review. Foreign orchestras in China during this dynasty included orchestras from India, Bokhara, East Turkestan, Cambodia,

Burma, Annam, Tibet, and Mongolia.

Song Dynasties (960-1279)

This is the first period in the history of Chinese music from which printed music of the time survives to the present. The famous Song

Confucian philosopher Ju Shii, whose ideas exhibit some affinity with the monadology of Leibniz,1 left twelve melodies for twelve songs from the

Book of Songs.2 The following is a setting of the first song, of which we have already seen what is possibly a Tarng version (p. 105):3

Ex. 183

This melody is in several respects remarkable. It is heptatonic considered as a whole, but the first stanza is entirely pentatonic and the

last stanza is pentatonic except for the last line: the mode is stated to be re on D sharp but is in fact a mixture of this and do on F. Ju Shii

ascribes all twelve melodies to a Tarng source and to the reign of the emperor Shiuantzong, Kaiyuan (713-741).

A figure from Sonq times deserving of much more attention than he has as yet received, either from Chinese or from Western scholars,

is the poet and composer, Jiang Kwei, the White Stone Taoist. His works include Nine Songs for Yueh (111) (Yueh is the ancient name

for Jehjiang and Jiangshi Provinces) written in liu-hleu notation; a song with zither accompaniment and interlude (p. 111); and a number

of tunes in the Sonq pyipar(?)-notation which, though they have received some attention,4 have not as yet been transcribed.

1 E. R. Hughes, The Great Learning and the Mean-in-Action (London, 1942), p. 167.

2 Ju Shii, Yilii Jingjiuan Tongjiee Shyyueh Pian (110). Reprinted in the Yueh Dean (168) of Hwang Tzuoo (1692).

3 Stanza-divisions following Waley, Songs, p. 81.

4 Shiah Cherngdao, ‘Bairshyr Gecheu Parngpuu Biann’, Yannjing Shyyebaw (113) (Peiping, 1932). According to a recent report from Pekin (Dahgong Baw, 7. ix, 1954), this

notation has now been deciphered; and a substantial body of Sonq music in the same notation has newly been discovered.

Page 149

110

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Of the nine songs for the people of Yueh, the first six make use of

only the seven notes of the diatonic scale, the mode being do or re in

various keys. The text of the following example describes the singer

awaiting the goddess of the Wuuchang Gulf (112), pouring a libation

and riding the waves. The bar-lines mark the end of the lines (deter-

mined from the sense and from the verse-form); the comma indicates

the caesura; and the double bar marks the ends of the stanzas. The

mode is re on G sharp.

Ex. 184 The Spirit of the Billows

Four of the songs of Jiang Kwei make use of fractional tones

(p. 99). In this example the mode is la on C. Fractional tones are

indicated by diamond-shaped notes, following Levis.1

Ex. 185 General Parng

The single song with zither accompaniment by the same composer

is prefaced by explicit directions for tuning the seven strings to the

scale: F G A B d e g. The song is entitled 'Old Regrets'. It is a

woman who sings, considering with bitterness the passing of her beauty.

After the first stanza there is an interlude in harmonics for zither

alone; at the end of this the normal position is resumed and the voice

enters once more. In the transcription below (Ex. 186) the tablature

has been emended, where necessary. All notes not a direct transcrip-

1 J. H. Levis, The Foundations of Chinese Musical Art (Peiping, 1936), p. 175.

Page 150

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

111

tion from the text are printed small in the transcription.1The bar-lines

mark the end of the lines (determined from the sense); the double bar

marks the end of the stanzas (explicit in the layout of the text); and

the comma marks a caesura. The tablature does not indicate the dura-

tion of the notes; the minim values are supplied on the principle that

a note at the end of a line is likely to be prolonged for at least two

beats of the basic note-value. A change in the direction of the stems

of successive notes at the same pitch, but played in different positions,

indicates that the timbre is changed. Though the finger technique is

rudimentary compared with later zither technique, the variety of posi-

tions in which the same note is taken, and hence the variety of timbre,

is very considerable. If the example is played on the piano, the sus-

taining pedal and una corda should be depressed until the end of each

'bar', and as much variety in touch as possible should be given to

notes at the same pitch. The voice presumably reduced the zither part

to the range of one octave.

Ex. 186

From various sources it is known that the street performances of

the koeileei in Sonq times were accompanied by the music known as

chingyueh (114).2This was the term used by Swei and Tarng writers

to cover the old-style (non-ritual) music of Hann and Wey times; the

term persisted until Sonq times and was used in contrast to hwuyueh

1Versions in the Syhbuh Tsongkan and in the Cheangtsuen Tsongshu have both been

utilized in making this transcription. See pl. 5 (b). 2Soun K'ai-ti, op. cit.

Page 151

112

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

(barbarian music). The chingyueh orchestra included several instruments lacking in the imperial band of Sonq times, such as the fang-sheang (115) (a chime of sixteen pieces of iron),1 sheng, dyi, &c. It seems it was in Sonq times that the evolution from the puppet to the human theatre occurred, and that this development took place through an intermediate step of living puppets, that is, of children dressed as adults. Two separate types of performance developed from the street entertainment of the ‘flesh puppets’; each consisted of dances and songs. They differed with respect to the origin of their music and of the texts of their songs. One type made use of the words of songs originally belonging to the repertoire of secular entertainments in the palace—the yann (116) (banquet) music of Tarng and Sonq times, but their music was the chingyueh, in which the cross-flute, dyi, was the chief melodic instrument supporting the voice; this type is known as Nancheu (117) (Southern Songs) in the repertoire which survives to this day as classical opera. The other type made use of the words and music of yannyueh songs, and the chief instrument supporting the voice was the pyipar. This was the origin of the Beeicheu (118) (Northern Songs) of the repertoire of classical opera. The names of the two genres are understandable, since the Northern Songs were strongly influenced by foreign music reaching China from the north, while the Southern Songs reflected the musical atmosphere of the more conservative south.

If anything of the music of these entertainments survives, it has undoubtedly undergone constant revision at the hands of successive generations of performers. The following three ‘overtures’ are supposed to be of pre-Yuan date.2 They are entirely pentatonic and might well belong to the Nancheu tradition, but there is no documentary evidence of their antiquity.

Ex. 187

1 A. C. Moule. op. cit., p. 146.

2 Soulié de Morant and Gailhard, op. cit., p. 121.

Page 152

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

113

3

The lyrics of Nancheu and Beeicheu were written in a special verse form, the tsyr (119), in which the lines are of irregular length and the syllables succeed each other in an ordered pattern of tones. The Chinese language is essentially monosyllabic, and since there are no double or triple initial consonants and only two finals in the northern dialect (for example), the sound equipment is poor. The number of different monosyllables is increased to something less than 1,400 by pronouncing each syllable with four different varieties of melodic accent (in the northern dialect)—the four tones. They have been represented in staff notation by Courant1 as follows:

Ex. 188

I

II

or

II

III

IV

The melodic accents are functionally neums,2 and the types of melodic movement displayed in the four sheng (120) (the tones) are described as level, rising, falling, and entering. Shen Iau (fifth century) (121) was the first to make deliberate use of a pattern of accents, level and oblique (pyng (122) and tseh (123)), in a new style of poem, the liuhshy (124), in lines of five or seven syllables. At the end of the Tarng dynasty, one of the types of poem making use of a conscious neum-pattern was the tsyr.3 The length of line is irregular in this type, and the poem is held together by the repetition, with variations, of a number of different unit patterns of tonal accents. If we represent the level tones by – and oblique tones (rising, falling, and entering) by / the structure of a poem of this kind can be displayed diagrammatically as shown overleaf.

The melody of many Chinese songs is but an exaggeration of the tonal accents and is inherent in the first pyngtseh draft of the poem; a melody devised according to the pyngtseh scheme shown here, by

1 M. Courant, La Langue chinoise parlée (Paris, 1914), p. 19.

2 J. H. Levis, op. cit., pp. 21 ff.

3 A. Hoffmann, Die Lieder des Li Yü (Cologne, 1950), pp. 105 ff.

B 3608

I

Page 153

114 THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

the Ching poet-composer, Shieh Yuanhwai (125), is transcribed on p. 125. The importance of the tsyr form in the history of Chinese music lay in its providing a great variety of types of melodic structure of considerable subtlety which could be used as moulds for new poems.

-- -- / 1

-- / -- /

-- / 1 -- /

-- -- / 1

-- / 1

  • / 1 1

  • / 1 1 -- /

-- / 1 -- /

-- -- / 1

The cheu was a quasi-popular development of the Sonq tsyr; it adhered less strictly to the tonal and rhythmic structure of the original pyngtseh draft; it was less ‘classical’ in its language and often betrayed local dialectical peculiarities in its tonal structure.

Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368)

Although there existed in Sonq times a type of theatrical performance known as Tzarjiuh (126) (literally ‘Variety’), it was not until Yuan times that complete operas, comprising action, declamation, and songs, were devised.1 The Yuancheu (127), as these works are known collectively, are of high literary quality and are the first representatives of the dramatic genre in the history of Chinese literature. While the importance of the Yuancheu as literature has been recognized by Western writers,2 the fact that these were operas, not plays in the Western sense, has tended to be overlooked, and their very remarkable musical structure is virtually an unexplored field for future study.

At the time of the coming to power of the Yuan, two schools of opera were already established, the northern and southern schools of the Sonq dynasty; their differences reflect differences between the two regions in temperament and in contacts, and affect versification, music, and style in the broad sense. Musically the schools differed in that the southern school was strictly pentatonic and used the cross-flute as the chief accompanying instrument (if strings were used they

1 Chiang Un-kai, K'ouen K'iu -- le théâtre chinois ancien (Paris, 1932).

2 A. P. L. Bazin Aîné, Théâtre chinois (Paris, 1838); Le Siècle des Youen (Paris, 1854).

Page 154

were secondary); while the northern school made use of the heptatonic scale, with free use of semitones, and the accompanying instrument was a stringed instrument. At the beginning of the Yuan, the northern school was particularly active and works composed entirely in the northern style were known by the same name as the Sonq ‘variety’ theatre, that is, as tzarjiuh.

One of the most fascinating musical features of these early operas (a feature still characteristic of Chinese opera) is the use of a label, the cheupair (128) or song-label, for each verse-form. The cheupair is a fragment of a cheu poem, usually consisting of three characters, and its function is to recall to the reader the structure of that particular verse-form. Its function may be compared with that of the metrical formulas in hymnals in the West which indicate to what type of melody a hymn text can be sung or for what texts a given tune is suitable. Very often the author was guided by association in his choice of a particular cheupair in a particular situation. Thus he might use the cheupair : shii shiangferng (129) (‘delights in conjunction’) if he felt a correspondence between the situation to be presented and the spirit of this cheupair. Since a particular cheupair was limited to a particular mode, this system tended to reinforce the association of that mode with a particular verse-form and a particular emotional situation. The number of different melodies current was (and still is) far smaller than the number of lyrics. A casual opera-goer, who did not happen to know a particular lyric, would nevertheless have some clue to the emotional situation, if he were familiar with the tune. This is still true at the present time and is essential to the average person’s enjoyment of opera, since the lyrics are written for the most part in a language too literary to be comprehended by the ear alone.

Up to 1297 the northern was the more important of the two schools, but after this date mixed works, including acts in both northern and southern styles, were written, and by the end of the Yuan the southern school had become dominant. Five works of the ancient southern school survive, of which the most famous is the Pyipar Jih (130), The Story of the Lute, by Gau Ming (131). These were written at the end of the Yuan or at the beginning of the Ming. At the present time they are better known from private reading than from stage performance and are often played by amateurs en famille.

Ex. 189 is an overture said to date from the end of the thirteenth century and often made use of in The Little Shepherd (p. 107). A note outside the mode occurs in bars 15 and 16.1

1 Soulié de Morant and Gailhard, op. cit., p. 121, no. 4.

Page 155

116

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ex. 189

Ex. 190 is an intermezzo (guohmen (132); literally, ‘crossing the threshold’) said to date from the fourteenth century and chosen on account of its free-flowing line. A Bb outside the mode occurs frequently:1

Ex. 190

A most interesting feature of Chinese opera is the use of a characteristic theme or yeadyi (133) (literally, ‘elegant flute’) as a leitmotive in certain situations, or to express certain feelings. Three instances, possibly earlier than the thirteenth century, are given in Exs. 191, 192, and 193:2

Ex. 191

Anger, despair, plotting

Ex. 192

Lovers' quarrels

1 Soulié de Morant and Gailhard, op. cit., p. 123, no. 4. 2 Ibid., p. 124.

Page 156

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

Ex. 193

Joy, pleasure, drinking

A collection of Yuan melodies for zither, only one of which has been transcribed, is contained in the Sehpuu (Music for the Seh) of Shyong Pernglai.1 This includes four volumes of tunes in both liuhleu and flute notation. One volume consists of twelve tunes identical with those of Ju Shii previously considered (p. 109); two volumes are entitled New Tunes for the Songs (that is, for songs from the Book of Songs), and a fourth is devoted to the Confucian ritual.

Ming and Ching Dynasties (1368-1911)

(i) Seven-stringed zither. The tablatures of seven-stringed zither tunes, printed in sumptuous large-paper copies and published in the Ming period, were one of the less conspicuous products of that unparalleled craftsmanship which has made the name of this dynasty a household word in the West. It will be convenient to treat the period from 1368 to the end of the Ching and even to the present day without further subdivision. The most famous zither tunes (with but few exceptions) were already in existence at the beginning of the Ming, but they are played today in Ching versions.

The nature of the development which the tunes have undergone between early Ming and Ching editions, is clear from successive versions (Exs. 194, 195, and 196) of the prelude from the tune ‘Clouds over the Rivers Shiau and Shiang’, ascribed to the Sonq composer, Guo Mean (134). Whenever a group of notes occurs in the early version which also occurs in the tune as played today, it has been given the same rhythmic structure in transcription as in current performance, so that the similarity between the versions is emphasized. The three preludes are in harmonics throughout.

1 Shyong Pernglai, Sehpuu (198). See Yang Inliou, Jonggwo Inyueh Shyygang (Shanghai, 1953), p. 194. A Yuan melody for zither is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 1.

Page 157

118

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ex. 194

Ex. 195

Ex. 196

Ex. 194 is the prelude as it appears in the Rare and Valuable Secret

Treatise of an Emaciated Immortal1 (135), dated 1425. It bears the

title: ‘Mist and Rain on the Dongtyng Lake.’ The text contains one

complex which does not make sense; in its place a single note has

been supplied to complete the phrase. The slur indicates that the

1

Chyushian Shernchyi Mihpuu (135), by the Prince of Ning.

Page 158

HISTORY OF THE MUSIC

119

repeated notes are all played on the same string. Ex. 195 is taken from

the Wugaang Chynpuu (136) of 1546. It has undergone amplification

by extension and repetition of its members, and by interpolation. In

this edition the prelude no longer carries a subtitle. One note has been

supplied where the tablature seems to be faulty. The third version of

the prelude is that current today. It differs but little in line from the

seventeenth-century version in the Chingshan Chynpuu (137) (1673)

though the notes are frequently produced in different positions. The

transcription is made from a manuscript copy from an unknown

source. The note-values approximate to those adopted by Shyu

Yuanbair (138), one of the virtuosi of the present day. The prelude

has now become an extended melody which, even when it finishes,

leaves the way open for more to follow. Interest is maintained by

a continual shifting of the tonal centre.

1

From the cheu structure of the classical operatic melody to that of

the seven-stringed zither tune, the difference is one of degree rather

than kind. The smaller tunes (sheaucheu (139)) are essentially cheu

melodies; the words usually survive and are commonly sung by the

performer as the tune is played. This is so for the tunes ‘Fang

Tzyychyi’ (140) (‘Visiting Tzyychyi’), and ‘Yangguan San Dye’

(141), (‘Three Repetitions of the tune: “The Yang Pass””), which will

be referred to later. The larger tunes or dahcheu (102) are purely instru-

mental, and their structure is that of a melody of higher order; they

are for the most part rondos, in which the returns of the main tune

are transposed up or down by one or more octaves—necessarily with

change in timbre, or presented in different ‘registration’—in har-

monics or in a different position, without change in pitch but with

change in timbre. The importance of timbre in this music is such that

any transcription into staff notation can give but a faint impres-

sion of the original.

The larger tunes almost invariably begin with a prelude in slow

time, often on the open strings, but frequently in harmonics. The

prelude may include a characteristic turn of the main melody, as in

the Ching version of ‘Meihua San Nonq’ (142) (‘Three Repetitions

of the tune: “Plum Blossom”’) which is here transcribed from

Ja Fuhshi’s (143) recording in the Library of Congress2 (Ex. 197).

Versions of this tune occur in Ming tablatures of 1530 and 1546. The

first six notes of the prelude are related to the central phrase in the

1

Library of Congress, Music Division, Mr. Cha playing Chinese music, Order No.

1095, 4 sides: 4B, 5A, 5B, 6A. A slightly different version from that of Mr. Shyu.

2

Library of Congress, Music Division, Mr. Cha playing Chinese music, Order No.

1095, 3 sides: 3A, 3B, 4A; also in The History of Music in Sound, side 2 (b).

Page 159

120

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ex. 197

Adagio molto

main tune; the latter appears three times in harmonics, always in a different position. The following example is a transcription of the tune at its third appearance, again as played by Ja. This is one of the most immediately engaging tunes in the zither repertoire.

Ex. 198

Allegretto

A prelude of unusual type, echoing Buddhist cantillation, is that to the famous tune ‘Puuan Jow’ (144) (‘The Spell of Puuan’):

Ex. 199

Adagio

Puuan was an Indian Buddhist of the twelfth century, but the tune of this name was probably not composed before the seventeenth century. The prelude opens with octaves, one string being caused to produce a succession of sounds by shifting the finger after plucking. The second section of the prelude is in harmonics (beginning at the change of clef in the example). Although in many respects a work sui generis it deserves mention here because of its great popularity

Page 160

with zither players. Its square-cut rhythms recall Pekin opera-tunes

and folk-songs of the north-western border.1

The climax of a zither tune is frequently marked by a passage in

harmonics. If the work is of considerable extent there may be more

than one such—as in ‘Meihua San Nonq’, for example. These passages

are felt to be of the greatest emotional tension: at these moments the

music leaves the earth.

Most of the zither tunes, whether short or long, end with a

coda in harmonics. This may be very short, or it may contain

a reference to the main tune and summarize the whole work, as in

the coda to ‘Yangguan San Dye’ (‘Three Repetitions of the tune:

"The Yang Pass"').2

Ex. 200

This includes a reference to the second phrase of the opening melody.

The whole of the first section, including the thrice repeated refrain is

transcribed in Ex. 201.

Ex. 201

The pass referred to in the title is that in the north-west through which

so many have travelled to real or virtual exile. A Northern Song to

the same words is transcribed in Ex. 210 (p. 127). It is not unusual for

the last note of the coda to be a note other than the expected tonic,

as in Ex. 200. Another example is provided by the end of a short tune

1 Also recorded by Cha under the title ‘Universal Benediction’, Library of Congress,

Music Division, Order No. 1095, 3 sides: 1B, 2A, 2B.

2 A transcription of the opening phrases of a version of this work is printed by F. Bose

in Musikalishe Völkerkunde (Freiburg i. Br., 1953) as No. 50 of the musical examples,

taken from a recording: Overseas Branch Rec. 17–2954, collected by Reinhard.

Page 161

122

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

peculiar to Syhchuan Province, ‘Visiting Tzyychyi’. The harmonics begin at the change to the treble clef.

Ex. 202

Andante

Successive appearances of the main tune are usually at different pitches but in the same key. Modulation in the sense of a change of key is relatively infrequent. It occurs commonly, however, in the sense of a shift in the tonal centre, even in the course of one and the same melody, as shown in Exs. 196 and 201 ; the melody temporarily behaves as if some other note in the note-series of the mode were the tonic. Occasionally a true modulation to the dominant occurs, as in the following example from ‘Puan Jow’.

Ex. 203

Andante

This is the passage in harmonics at the climax of the work. Two arpeggios of harmonics bring about a modulation to the dominant and there follows a pause on the dominant. Where the clef changes to the bass clef in Ex. 203, the normal position and the key of the tonic are resumed. Another example, in a work predominantly ‘minor’ in colouring, occurs in the short tune ‘Yih Guhren’ (145) (‘Remembering a Friend’1) in which transition to the new key is prepared through the mediant. In this example the B is flattened throughout (Ex. 204).

1 Library of Congress, Music Division, Mr. Cha playing Chinese music, Order No. 1095, 2 sides: 9B, 10A; under the title ‘In Memory of a Deceased Friend at a Lonely Hill’.

Page 162

Ex. 204

Occasionally a note outside the mode may be introduced with overwhelming effect. Towards the end of ‘Shiau-Shiang Shoei Yun’ (146) (‘Clouds over the Rivers Shiau and Shiang’) such a note occurs; it is sometimes interpreted as a monastery bell.

Ex. 205

(ii) Pyipar and Jeng. Of the instruments introduced into China in historic times, only the pyipar can compare with the chyn in the extent of its repertoire and the virtuoso skill attained by its finest exponents. Published transcriptions of pyipar music1 are atypical inasmuch as it is characteristic of this music that the melody is frequently accompanied by a simple bass—perhaps a single note repeated as a pedal point, and that considerable use is made of repeated chords. On the whole, music for the pyipar is even more frankly descriptive than that for the chyn. One of the finest performers, Yang Dahjiun (147), executes a battle-piece that includes imitations of the groans of the wounded and dying, and a moving version of the famous tune, ‘Geese Descend on the Level Sands’, with astonishingly birdlike noises.

In recent years Liang Tzaypyng (148) has travelled extensively in the mountainous interior of Fwujiann (149) Province, collecting jeng tunes from elderly performers and studying their technique. In the south-west, and particularly in Kuenming (150), there is a vigorous group of amateurs of this instrument, and itinerant performers are to be heard in Cherndu (151), the capital of Syhchuan Province. One of the most memorable tunes is entitled ‘Cold Crows Playing with Water’.

1 E. Fischer, Beiträge zur Erforschung der chinesischen Musik (Leipzig, 1910), also in Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, xii (1911), pp. 153-206. Other transcriptions will be found in A. Dechevrens, ‘Étude sur le système musical chinois’, Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, ii (1901), pp. 484-551.

Page 163

124

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

CHINESE INSTRUMENTAL HETEROPHONY

A few transcriptions from phonograph recordings demonstrating Chinese polyphonic practice have been made. The first example is from a sheng recording.1

Ex. 206

The second is for cross-flute (dyi) and fiddle (yuehchyn). The conclusion only is quoted. The yuehchyn accompaniment is largely a variation on the flute melody at the fourth below. The interest of this combination for a Chinese ear lies in the simultaneous presentation of theme and variant, not in their incidental clashes.2

Ex. 207

1 E. Fischer, Beiträge, p. 1.

2 Ibid., p. 11.

Page 164

( 125 )

THE STRUCTURE OF CHINESE INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC

From an analysis of nine recorded works, all popular in character, it is clear that both binary (or quaternary) and ternary types of construction occur.1 In their formal organization the pieces analysed reveal a high level of development; indeed, many of the formal complexities encountered can be paralleled in the procedures of the Netherland school of the fifteenth century. The structure of these nine pieces is generally as follows: after an introduction, a complex of groups of phrases is repeated several times with variation. Among the different types of variation the following may be mentioned; a group of phrases may be lengthened or diminished, or entirely omitted, or varied with such freedom that the variant is only recognizable as such because it retains some characteristic turn. Within a group, several bars may be transposed to the fifth or fourth; they may be arranged in a different order or they may be replaced by others. Transposition of entire themes to the fifth or fourth is fairly common, and two-part writing in parallel fifths or fourths, comparable to early medieval Western practice, is frequent.

In one instance a comparison has been made between recorded performances (on sanshyan and on the large hwuchyn, p. 93), by two different performers, and the noted version supplied by one of the performers.2 The tune in question has been subjected to detailed analysis and in spite of its seeming simplicity is plainly anything but artless in construction. Its title, ‘Visiting the Son of Heaven,’ goes back at least to early Ching times; but the particular tune analysed is not one of the tunes of this title printed in the great Palace Collection of tsyr of 1747.

A TSYR MELODY

In his study of The Foundations of Chinese Musical Art, Levis analysed four tsyr melodies by the Ching composer, Shieh Yuanhwai, written in 1848 according to the tonal structure followed by the Tarng or Sonq author of the tsyr in question. The pattern of one of these Sonq tsyr was given earlier, on p. 114. The following example is Shieh Yuanhair’s realization of the neums, transcribed by Levis:

Ex. 208

1 E. Fischer, op. cit., p. 29.

2 E. M. von Hornbostel, ‘Ch’ao-t’ien-tze (Eine chinesische Notation und ihre Ausführungen)’, Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, i (1919), pp. 477–98.

Page 165

126

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

OPERA1

At the beginning of the Ming dynasty the southern school of opera became divided into many small schools, working in different regions and making use of local dialects in their scripts. Towards the middle of the sixteenth century, a native of Kuenshan (152) in Jiangsuḥ (153) Province, Liang Borlong (154), wrote the script of The Story of the Laundress of Fine Textiles which was set to music by a fellow countryman from a neighbouring town, Wey Liangfuu (155), who had invented a new style of singing. The result of their collaboration was immensely successful. The school which they founded at first bore the name of Shoeimodiaw (156) (literally: ‘song ground in water’) but it gradually assumed the name of Kuencheu (157): The songs of the men from Kuenshan. The collaborators proceeded to revise the works of the southern school, and their revisions were generally approved and accepted as models. The name Kuencheu as used at the present time, however, includes not only works of the southern school written subsequent to the collaboration of Liang Borlong and Wey Liangfuu, but also all the works of the Yuan period, particularly those revised by Wey himself. The chwanchyi (158) was the characteristic form developed by the school of Kuenshan and differed in length from the Yuan tzarjiuh. While the latter had consisted of but four acts and a single singing role, the chwanchyi were composed of thirty to fifty acts of which perhaps four-fifths were in the southern style and the rest in northern; several acts might be mixed in style. From the point of view of the arrangement of the acts according to style, the seventeenth-century opera Charngsheng Diann (159) (‘The Hall of Long Life’) by Horng Sheng (160) is today regarded as a model. Chwanchyi also differed from tzarjiuh (p. 114) in the number of singing roles; the former recognized six chief types whose identification by the audience was (and is) facilitated by their characteristic costumes and maquillage. Each act of a classical Chinese opera comprises both declamation and measured song. An important character, entering at the beginning of an act, will declaim a prologue in prose explaining the situa-

1 Excerpts from Chinese Opera are recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, sides 2 and 3.

Page 166

tion. This will be followed by a poem, which in turn will be followed

by a monologue in prose. Each act is given a pithy title such as the

following, taken from the Pyipar Jih: ‘Marriage by Imperial Com-

mand’; ‘Help to the Hungry’; ‘Difficulties in Maintaining Parents-

in-Law’; ‘Sale of Hair to Bury Parents-in-law’; ‘Entire Family

Decorated’.

A single act will generally include ten cheu, all in the same mode

and key, either all in the southern or all in the northern style or with

some in each style. Generally speaking the cheupair (128) are so

chosen that all are suitable for the expression of the same quality of

feeling, and the individual cheu patterns normally succeed each other

in the order of their classification in the mode.

Exs. 209 and 210 are melodies of the southern and northern

schools respectively:

Ex. 209

Ex. 210

These (and Ex. 208) are the only examples of Chinese vocal melody so

far quoted that display melismatic as opposed to syllabic structure.

All Sonq and Yuan melodies known from contemporary documents

are syllabic, as were (so far as is known) the most ancient Chinese

melodies; but it is to be remembered that none of the surviving

melodies is popular in character, and it may well be that a proportion

of the koeileei melodies of Tarng times were at least partly melismatic.1

Whereas in the past twelve flutes, each at the pitch of a different

1 Exs. 209 and 210 are transcribed from T’ung Fei, Fundamentals of Chinese Music,

ii (Shanghai, 1927) (195), pp. 19, 20.

Page 167

128

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

liuhleu, were used to accompany kuencheu, only a single flute is used

today. The largest number of modes now used in any tonality is

four, and two tonalities are represented by a single mode only. Each

mode or system is associated with a definite character—fresh and dis-

tant, sighing and afflicted, rapid and varied, fierce and melancholy,

elegant and reserved, &c. It is perhaps worth recalling that similar

feeling about modal quality was current in Europe at least as late as

the sixteenth century.

The essential accompanying instrument in kuencheu performances

is the cross-flute, dyi, but other wind instruments—flute, mouth-organ,

oboe-type reed instruments—may be added; strings—sanshyan and

pyipar—may support the dyi; and a body of percussion is indispens-

able—indeed, the hoop-drum, bangguu (161), leads the ensemble.

Changes of scene, and the beginning and end of the acts, are indicated

by vigorous interludes for percussion alone. There may be some

trace of Indian or at least central Asian influence in these interludes,

though Chinese drumming never approaches the rhythmic complexity

of that of India.

In Nanking or Pekin one may hear professional performances of

kuencheu; but thè operas to be heard all over China, even in small

country towns, belong to the new northern style developed in the

nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The style is associated with

the Manchu capital, Pekin, and operas of this type are often referred

to collectively as jingshih (162) (plays of the capital). Provincial opera

merits greater attention than it has hitherto received.1 Like the classical

northern opera (of which it is to a certain extent the descendant)

jingshih makes use of a stringed instrument (a hwu chyn of some kind)

as the chief instrument supporting the voice. Superficially the most

obvious difference between kuencheu and jingshih lies in the rejection

of the tsyr form of lyric and the abundance of symmetrical melodies.

While kuencheu makes use of only two rhythms: a 2/4 with the

first beat strongly accented, and a 4/4 with the first beat strongly

accented and the third beat divided into two quavers, jingshih

makes use of a considerable number of rhythms, both regular and

irregular.

The following example is transcribed from The Kingfisher-Feather-

Screen-Mountain (Tsueypying Shan) (163), a jingshih opera of the

genre bangtzyy (164). The vocal line in 2/4 time is accompanied by a

fiddle in 3/4 time, a sonorous wooden block beaten in 3/4 time

1 Chao Wei-pang, ‘Yang-ko, the Rural Theatre in Ting-hsien, Hopei’, Folklore

Studies, iii (Peiping, 1944), pp. 17–40.

Page 168

(the bangtzyy from which the genre takes its name), and a hoop-drum:1

Ex. 211

As an example of a leitmotif of much later date than those given on p. 116, the following is of considerable rhythmic interest; it depicts complete intoxication (Ex. 212).2

1 Soulié de Morant and Gailhard, op. cit., p. 137.

2 Ibid., p. 125.

B 3608

K

Page 169

130

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ex. 212

Evidence of the remarkable accuracy of the oral tradition in Chinese opera is provided by the nearly complete agreement between the kuencheu recording in Hornbostel's record-series Musik des Orients, and the printed edition of 1792.1 The intervals agree almost entirely, but there are slight rhythmic deviations—a crotchet in the edition of 1792 may become a dotted crotchet in the recorded version.

FOLK-SONG

The scientific study of Chinese folk-music has scarcely begun, for though many collections are now being made, no collector, so far as is known, has as yet made recordings in the field; all depend on the ear. From personal observations made during a brief stay in central China it seems probable that traces of other and older types of scalar structure survive in the folk-music. This is suggested by street-cries collected in Syhchuan and Gueyjou Provinces. The enharmonic tetrachord (a fourth built up from a major third and a minor second) of the Japanese modes hirazyoosi, kumoizyoosi, and iwato-zyoosi (p. 145) is rare in classical Chinese music and jingshih; it occurs, however, in the following street-cry:

Ex. 213

Again, chains of thirds, so striking a feature of Western, African,

1 Wang Kwang-chi, 'Über die chinesische klassische Oper 1530-1860', Orient et Occident, Bibliothèque Sino-Internationale (Geneva, 1934).

Page 170

Polynesian, and American Indian music, rarely occur in classical

Chinese music, so strong is the tendency for a minor third to form a

unit by adding a major second; yet Exs. 214 and 215 (also street-cries)

are both expanded triads:

Ex. 214

Ex. 215 illustrates a primitive stage of the 123 scale1 (Eb, F, G, Bb)

in which two superposed thirds form a pentachord and the lower

third is filled in (123. 5). Ex. 216 is interesting in that the fourths are

only acciacaturas:

Ex. 216

One feature of everyday life in China which impresses the stranger

is the singing of the coolies; when pulling or carrying loads, they

improvise a seemingly continuous chant, which has the function of

co-ordinating activities and maintaining the rate of working at the

optimum pace set by the leader. It is in fact an antiphon between

leader and gang, in which statement and answer tread so closely on

each other's heels that the sound is effectively continuous. Ex. 217

might be sung (to the vowel sound 'ah') by men pulling a loaded cart

up hill.

Ex. 217

Leader

Gang

Step

1 Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 123.

Page 171

132

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

Ex. 218, on the other hand, might be sung by men trotting with a load slung on poles.

Ex. 218

In such improvised antiphons it is the leader alone who varies his utterance with successive repetitions. The answer frequently overlaps the statement. Sometimes one hears ‘shanties’ such as the following:

Ex. 219

An excellent short collection of popular Chinese songs, many of them folk-songs, has been published by C. H. and S. H. Chen.1 The collection merits praise not only for the notable accuracy of its transcriptions but for the quality of the accompaniments devised by C. H. Chen. In themselves they provide useful material for studying melodic variation and heterophony in Chinese music.

Ex. 220 is a well-known folk-song, sung to different words in different districts.2 It is a good example of the pure pentatonic genus, still characteristic of Chinese melody in spite of the constant infiltration of other genera from central Asia. Another purely penta-

1 C. H. and S. H. Chen, The Flower Drum and other Chinese Songs (New York, 1943). Other folk-tunes are to be found in A. G. Jacobs, The Chinese-American Song and Game Book (New York, 1944), and S. M. Graves and M. F. Farley, Min River Boat Songs (New York, 1946).

2 For another version of this tune see Hsiao Shusien, ‘La chanson populaire chinoise’, Sinologica, i (Basel, 1947), pp. 65–86.

Page 172

tonic folk-song is shown in Ex. 221, taken from a setting by Liu Shea-An [sic.]1

Ex. 220

Ex. 221

Within the last few years many popular collections of folk-songs from all provinces have been printed in China, transcribed in the numerical notation (p. 101). Though popular in character, these collections are of the greatest value and already enable us to determine the regions of transition to types of melody resembling those of western Asia.

BUDDHIST MUSIC

The music of the Buddhist office as practised in Chinese monasteries deserves special attention, since it embodies many features at first sight foreign to the Chinese musical genius. While some of these may well be due to Indian and Tibetan influence, some may echo that more primitive stratum of folk-music revealed in the street-cries already discussed. In a small monastery in Anshuen (165), Gueyjou Province, novices in their teens have been heard chanting the scriptures in thirds (cf. the English and Scandinavian gymel of the twelfth century). The range of cantillation was a fourth, and the result could be placed alongside Lachmann’s juxtaposition of the German folk-song ‘Laterne, Laterne!’ and Hornbostel’s Macusi Indian melody,2

1 Liu Shea-An, Three Songs (Tokyo, 1935).

2 R. Lachmann, ‘Musik der außereuropäischen Natur- und Kulturvölker’, Handbuch der Musikwissenschaft (Potsdam, 1929), p. 8; quoted by Sachs in The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 40.

Page 173

134

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 1. CHINA

as an example of the survival in China of tendencies observable in very primitive musical cultures elsewhere. At a funeral in a small country town, Meitarn (166) in Gueyjou Province, Buddhist priests were heard singing, to the accompaniment of cymbals and triangle, a metrical chant of that infectious gaiety so common in India and so rare in China. The aspect of Buddhist music which most merits study, however, is the singing of the office by precentor and novices. The instrumental accompaniment is provided entirely by idiophones and membranophones; the instruments include a large drum, a large bell, a gong, cymbals, a triangle, a small bell, and a wooden fish. The office begins with intoned statements and responses by precentor and novices, with occasional interruptions by single instruments. As the service proceeds the speed of recitation increases, and the precentor no longer waits for the novices to end their response before recommencing; as the overlapping antiphon develops, the frequency of percussive interruptions increases.1

Concerning the Taoist office no information is available. Several hymns making use of a notation unlike any other Chinese notation are printed in the Ming Dawtzanq (167). They have not been transcribed.

Note on the Zither-Transcriptions

To avoid excessive use of leger lines and signatures, the transcriptions on pp. 118–23 are made throughout as if the third string were tuned to F, so that in the commonest tuning the seven open strings will yield the series: C D F G A c d. In the hands of different performers, and on different instruments, the sounding pitch of the third string will range from F to Bb (below ‘cello bottom C).

1 See also A. Stanley, ‘Putoshan’, Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xlvi (1915), pp. 1–18.

Page 174

III

THE MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA

  1. OTHER COUNTRIES

By Laurence Picken

MONGOLIA

A considerable range of music recorded in eastern Mongolia has been published in transcription.1, 2, 3 The tunes are mostly pentatonic, with tetrachords consisting of a major second and a minor third. Major third scales, in which the tetrachords each consist of a major third with a minor second above, have been reported in melodies from the Buryat Mongols,4 but the material from eastern Mongolia does not afford a single example of this type. The melodies are often less than an octave in range and fall into two main groups: those in free rhythm and those which are measured. The first type is illustrated by the following example for male voice from the Chipchin tribe, ‘Bargas’ (an old tribal name) ‘of the Holy Mountain’.2

Ex. 222

The second example, the ‘Song of Chingis Khan’2 (male voice) from the Jalait tribe, is a symmetrical tune with a strong major flavour imparted by the arpeggiocd triad in the first bar (Ex. 223).

1 N. de Torhout and Humbert-Sauvageot, ‘Dix-huit chants et poèmes mongols’, Bibliothèque musicale du musée Guimet, 1re série, iv (Paris, 1937).

2 H. Haslund-Christensen and E. Emsheimer, The Music of The Mongols (Stockholm, 1943). Several small collections of Mongolian tunes have been published in China in recent years. The tunes are all of the measured, symmetrical type.

3 Chūichirō Takeda, ‘Songs of the Mongols, Notations and Explanations’, Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 147-54, and x-xi (Tokyo, 1952), pp. 67-73.

4 C. Stumpf, ‘Mongolische Gesänge’, Sammelbände für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (1922), pp. 107-12.

Page 175

136 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

Ex. 223

A third example, a flute solo from the Khorchin tribe,1 is Chinese in character.

Ex. 224

Many of the songs have flute, fiddle, or ‘guitar’ accompaniments. Descriptions are given of four-stringed and two-stringed fiddles (pl. 6 (a)); a zither resembling the Chinese jeng; three types of ‘guitar’ (lute), one of which is the same as the Chinese sanshyan; and cross-flutes of the dyi-type.1 The resemblance between the square-cut type of Mongolian melody and many of the tunes of Pekin opera is striking.

SHINJIANG (CHINESE TURKESTAN)

The material collected by Haslund-Christensen in the region of Urumchi (Dyi-huah) (169)2 has not as yet been published. This was taken from members of the Torgut tribe and should be of great interest. From a brief account of a troupe of dancers and musicians from Chinese Turkestan who visited Shanghai it seems that3 their practices show marked parallels to those of Tarng times. Thus

1 Haslund-Christensen and Emsheimer, op. cit., p. 37.

2 Figures in brackets refer to serial entries in the Glossary of Characters, p. 190.

3 In Faaluu, ‘Tsorng Lihshyy-shanq Luenn Shinjiang Gewuu’, Shanghae Jongiang Ryhbaw (Shanghai, 12 Dec. 1947) (172).

Page 176

PLATE VI

CHINESE AND OTHER FAR-EASTERN INSTRUMENTS

(a) Manchurian fiddle ( ); (b) Chingmiau mouth-organ ( ); (c) Lolo Jew's harp ( ); (d) Minjia toy Jew's harp ( ); (e) Borneo zither ( ); (f) Borneo mouth-organ ( ); (g) Detail of the same ( )

For further details see page xiv.

Page 178

dancers, dances, and instruments correspond to descriptions in the

Tarng poet Bair Jiuyih and in poems from early anthologies (Yuehfuu

Shyji) (170); and their music displays structural features fitting the

descriptions of Tarng dahcheu (p. 106). One of their tunes has been

identified with the seven-stringed zither tune known as 'Jaujiun's

Lament' (171). It is remarkable that such an identification should have

been made precisely in the case of this particular zither tune, since

Jaujiun was the lady bestowed on the Hunnish Khan by the Emperor

and carried away to Mongolian territory in 33 B.C. This account

suggests that study of the music of this region may throw light on

Chinese music of Tarng times and may lead to the identification of

those tunes or parts of tunes in early zither handbooks which date

from Tarng times. Chinese workers have begun to collect folk-songs

in Shinjiang, and some of the material collected has now been pub-

lished. A high proportion of these tunes are symmetrical, measured

and heptatonic.

TIBET

The availability in recent years of a small number of recordings of

Tibetan music made in Lhasa has transformed the picture of the

music of Tibet based on earlier accounts.1 A recent review2 includes a

number of examples transcribed from these recordings and brings

together for the first time a wealth of information on Tibetan music

and musical instruments and on the functions of music in Tibetan

culture. The instruments described include a vertical flute with bell

and whistle-mouth-piece (gliṅ bu); a conical oboe similar to the

Chinese suonah (rgya gliṅ); bone trumpets (rkaṅ duṅ); large copper

horns, in some cases extensible like telescopes to a length of 3 metres

(rag duṅ); and percussion: braced copper kettle-drums and nailed

drums, including an hour-glass drum made from two human

skulls.3

The recordings show that at least three distinct types of music,

exclusive of folk-music, are practised in Lhasa. These are: (1) Sino-

Mongolian music resembling Chinese provincial opera. This may be

religious or secular. The following example is part of a hymn sung in

perfect unison by two nuns4 (Ex. 225).

1 A. H. Francke, 'La musique au Thibet' in Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and

La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3084–93.

2 P. C. Crossley-Holland, 'Tibetan Music', Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians,

viii (London, 1954), pp. 456–64.

3 An instrumental ensemble is recorded in The History of Music in Sound (H.M.V.),

i, side 4 (a).

4 Ibid, side 4 (c).

Page 179

138

MUSIC

OF

FAR

EASTERN

ASIA:

OTHER

COUNTRIES

Ex.

225

All

the

Lhasa

recordings

of

this

type

are

in

binary

rhythms.

The

secular

songs

may

be

accompanied

by

flute,

fiddle,

zither

(jeng),

lute,

and

percussion.

(2)

Liturgical

chanting.

The

voices

in

approximate

unison

and

lowest

register

move

in

small,

often

microtonal,

steps

with

an

occasional

step

of

a

minor

third,

to

the

accompaniment

of

single

metallophones,

drums,

and

at

times

a

horn-pedal.

Instruments

and

voices

may

be

rhythmically

independent

of

each

other,

or

they

may

coincide

and

proceed

together

in

an

unstressed

rhythm

of

equal

pulses,

as

in

the

following

example.1

Ex.

226

1

Recorded

in

The

History

of

Music

in

Sound,

i,

side

4

(b).

Page 180

TIBET

139

The vocal range in this recording is a diminished fifth, approximately subdivided into three minor seconds and a minor third. In the instrumental interludes for oboes, trumpets, pedal horns, and percussion, the melodic line may have a range of as much as an augmented sixth and resembles the vocal line of the third type (q.v.) Several observers comment on the constant use of drones during choral singing, and it has been suggested that this practice is due to Indian influence.1 Two horns, in unison, or a third or a fifth apart, may sustain a drone for several minutes; this usage is comparable to that of the large curved horns of India (rana śringa). The drum and cymbal rhythms, maintained by the orchestra, even when other instruments are silent, are Indian in character.2 (3) Overlapping antiphonal singing; this style occurs in the recordings of historical dramas. The melodic line is non-Chinese in character, unmeasured, with arpeggioted triads (both major and minor) and major-third cadential tetrachords with the semitone above, as shown in Ex. 227: ‘Su-ki-nyi-ma (Lady, bright as the sun).’3

Ex. 227

There is no supporting melodic instrument, and perhaps for this reason the pitch gradually drifts in the course of this type of singing. The overlaps may occur at the unison, but sustained major seconds and major and minor thirds are also to be heard. The partners in the antiphon are not always of equal importance; the ‘confidant’ may prolong the ends of the ‘protagonist’s’ melismata. In the following example: ‘Da-we Sing-ge (The lion of the moon)’, the cadences of

1 Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, East and West (New York, 1943), p. 145.

2 Ibid., p. 139.

3 Kyumu-Lunga Troupe (Lhasa); H.M.V. Recording, N. 16678 (Calcutta).

Page 181

140

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

the soloist are supported by a divided chorus, and there is a rhythmic accompaniment of drum and struck cymbal.1 In contrast to the purely vocal antiphons for two voices, this example is measured.

Ex. 228

All the recorded examples in this style are sung in falsetto; this may be related to the need to secure maximum audibility in open-air performance. The style has some affinity with Tibetan working songs (Ex. 229); examples of these have been noted in which (as in Ex. 228) two- and three-note chords are formed on sustained finals.2

Ex. 229

In contrast to Exs. 227 and 228, the voices here are of equal standing. The similarity to the antiphonal working chants of the Chinese (p. 131) is striking and merits closer examination, as does the parallel

1 Kyumu-Lunga Troupe (Lhasa): H.M.V. Recording, N. 16623 (Calcutta).

2 Francke, op. cit., pp. 3090, 3092.

Page 182

with songs for solo-voice and one-note chorus from Sarawak (Borneo) (p. 178).

It seems probable that musics from different cultural strata, and possibly from different cultural groups, co-exist in the Tibetan area.

This view is supported by a brief report from a traveller who entered Tibet from Nepal.1 The existence of a non-Chinese element in Tibetan folk-music is indicated by the whistled arpeggiòs of common chords, diminished sevenths, and fragments of whole-tone scales recorded.

The following example is of interest in relation to tetratonic, anhemitonic melodies from Indonesia (p. 170) where, however, the range is a tritone.

Ex. 230

A primitive three-note melody, consisting of two superimposed fourths, sung as a duet for men's voices has been transcribed.2 It may be compared with Japanese Buddhist cantillation, or with the vocal line of the Noo drama (p. 148).

Ex. 231

None of the recordings available exhibits the type of melody in ternary rhythm illustrated by Francke. Such rhythms, however, are common in Kashmiri music;3 their presence in Francke's material may be due to border-conditions. One tune from Francke's article is interesting in view of the occasional major-third tetrachords noted in the dramatic duets; but it must be emphasized that no Lhasa recording as yet shows a tune of this symmetry and rhythmic regularity with ascending major-third tetrachords having the semitone above.

Ex. 232

1 T. H. Somervell, ‘The Music of Tibet’, Musical Times, lxiv (1923), p. 108.

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 38.

3 Teachers’ Training College, Kashmiri Mûsiqi, i (Srinagar, no date) (in Urdu).

Page 183

142

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

A single specimen of lamaist music in score has been reproduced in facsimile.1 Superficially it is similar to the Taoist notation already mentioned (p. 134). This notation may have been brought to China with Mahayana Buddhism and borrowed by the Taoists, in the elaboration of their ritual.

KOREA

From the most extensive surveys2 of Korean music available, it is clear that a distinction must be made between the ritual music, directly derived from the Chinese Confucian or Buddhist ritual, and the secular music of the court and of the people. The latter differs markedly from Chinese music, either popular or classical, in that it makes almost exclusive use of 3/4 and 6/8 rhythms.

Korea acquired the Confucian orchestra early in the twelfth century, and instruments bearing the names of those in the Jou orchestra survive to this day. Some of the instruments preserved date from the fourteenth century. A number of variants of Chinese instruments also survive, several unique to Korea; there are, for example, six different types of half-tube zithers (chyn, seh, jeng, &c.). There is an interesting description of the completely mechanical performance of the ritual music: the fact that bells in a chime are hanging in the wrong order is of no importance; a difference of half a tone between bell-chime and stone-chime occasions no discomfort. The most valuable part of Eckardt's account is the description of the instruments and the sketch of Korean musical history; the description of the music leaves many questions unanswered; but on the whole Keh's transcriptions confirm Eckardt's findings.

Ex. 233, the beginning of the 'Hymn for the Sacrifice to Confucius', dates perhaps from the introduction of the ritual orchestra in the fourteenth century.3 The first four bars may be a distortion of Ex.177, p.102:

1 L. A. Waddell, The Buddhism of Tibet or Lamaism (Cambridge, 1934) p. 433. See also P. C. Crossley-Holland, op. cit., p. 458.

2 A. Eckardt, 'Koreanische Musik', Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens, xxiv B (Tokyo, 1930); C. S. Keh, 'Die koreanische Musik', Sammlung musikwissenschaftlicher Abhandlungen, xvii (Strasbourg, 1935).

3 Eckardt, op. cit.

Page 184

KOREA

143

The official adoption of the Confucian orchestra and ritual dates from

1114; but it is certain that Chinese instruments (and presumably music

too) were imported in Tarng times. The vertical angular harp is known

to have existed in Korea.

A second example, in this case of funeral music, is rhythmically not

unlike some of the works given in full score by Prince Tzayyuh in his

'Rustic Dances', quoted by Courant.1

Ex. 234

Eckardt reprints Courant's2 transcription of a piece for the black

zither (hyon kum) (173) which he checked against the performance of

a Korean musician. The last eleven bars are quoted here for their

rhythmic variety and to show the use of ornaments:

Ex. 235

The following is part of one of the folk-songs noted: 'The Song of the

Rising Sun and the Abiding Moon.' This is Keh's transcription.3

Ex. 236

1 M. Courant, 'Essai historique sur la musique classique des Chinois avec un ap-

pendice relatif à la musique coréenne' in Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i (Paris,

1913), pp. 135 ff.

2 Cf. C. S. Keh, op. cit., p. 7 of the musical examples.

3 Ibid., p. 215.

Page 185

144 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

The folk-songs include the following, a ‘National Song’, exhibiting major-third-plus-minor-second tetrachords.1

Ex. 237

It seems probable that many more vestiges of the Tarng and Sonq Chinese theatre survive in Korea than in China.

JAPAN

A substantial body of information concerning Japanese music has been available to the Western reader for more than half a century. The following short account is based largely on Sachs,2 Piggott,3 Courant,4 and Harich-Schneider.5

It might be expected that Japanese music would exhibit considerable Chinese influence; but it is perhaps somewhat surprising that it also exhibits features of which only traces are to be found in the music of China.

Pentatonic scales predominate, though there is a constant tendency for these to become heptatonic, as in Chinese music. The ‘Chinese’ modes are displayed in folk-song, as well as in more sophisticated

1 Eckardt, op. cit., p. 60.

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 122.

3 F. T. Piggott, The Music and Musical Instruments of Japan (Yokohama and London, 1893 and 1909).

4 Courant, ‘Japon: Notice historique’, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 242–56.

5 Eta Harich-Schneider, ‘The Present Condition of Japanese Court Music’, The Musical Quarterly, xxxix (New York, 1953), pp. 49–74.

Page 186

music, and it does not seem justifiable to assume that their usage dates only from the beginning of Chinese influence in late Wey and Tarng times. The tunings of the Japanese jeng (p. 90), the soo no koto (31), as used in the Imperial Ceremonial Orchestra, cover a range of six Chinese pentatonic modes.1 Three of these are so modes on A (e f# a b c#'), d (a b d' e' f#') and e (b c#' e' f#' g#') (using the Chinese nomenclature; see p. 94); these are the ritusen (174) (female forms) and on the whole are preferred to the three ryosen (175) (male forms), the do modes on d (d e f# a b), e (e f# g# b c#') and g (g a b d' e'). Occasionally other Chinese modes occur in Japanese music, as in Ex. 238, a 'Fisherman's Song' collected by the late Dr. Takeo Kamada of Tokyo University. This is in the re mode on C. Many other examples will be found in the recently published survey of folk-songs of Tokyo and district.2

Ex. 238

Though the re, sol, and la modes are usually thought of as modal inversions of the 123.56 scale, the ritu-type scale cannot have been derived from ryo: the latter, undoubtedly ancient, is based on the fifth and lacks the fourth; the former is based on units of a fourth.3 In contrast to the 'Chinese' scales, the 'national' scales, though pentatonic, have semitone steps. Like ritu, they are scales built up from units of a fourth, but the tetrachords consist of major third plus minor second. This is the type of tetrachord already met with in certain Tibetan and Korean melodies and occasionally encountered in fragments of Chinese folk-music (p. 130). While the Tibetan and Korean melodies do not exhibit scales exclusively built up from two tetrachords of this type, Japanese music offers abundant examples of melodies with pure 'major third' scales. Three principal modes are in use. The first mode, hirazyoosi (176), may be represented by the series: A B C E F A. Ex. 239 is a cowherd's song.4

1 Ibid., p. 56.

2 Y. Saionji, Nihon Minyō Taikan, Kantō-hen (Tokyo, 1953).

3 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 124.

4 Y. Matsudaira, Seven Japanese Folk Songs from Nambu District (Tokyo, 1937).

B 8608

L

Page 187

146

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

Ex. 239

Lento = 96

The second mode, kumoizyoosi (177), may be represented by the series: E F A B C E. Its plagal form is shown in Ex. 240, a Furuma dance song.1

Ex. 240

Andante

The third principal major third mode is iwato; it may be represented by the series: B C E F A B.

It is clear that modulation from one mode to another occurs frequently. The following example exhibits modulation from kumoizyoosi (disjunct tetrachords) to hirazyoosi (conjunct tetrachords):2

Ex. 241

1 Y. Kiyose, Six Japanese Folk Songs from Shinano District (Tokyo, 1937).

2 N. Peri, 'Essai sur les gammes japonaises,' Bibliothèque musicale du musée Guimet, 2e série, i (Paris, 1934), p. 54, quoted by Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 126.

Page 188

JAPAN

147

Both ‘Chinese’ and ‘Japanese’ pentatonic scales tend to be converted to heptatonic forms; the former, by inserting a sharpened fourth and a major seventh, yielding the typical Chinese heptatonic scale: F G A (B) C D (E) F; the latter, by dividing the major thirds into two major seconds: A B C (D) E F (G) A. Music in the ‘Japan-ese’ scales frequently alternates between ‘major’ and ‘minor’ variants of the mode.1

It is of the greatest importance for the study of Far Eastern music that there survives in Japan, albeit in modified form, music of the Tarng dynasty, introduced from China, along with Korean and Indian music, between the seventh and the tenth centuries.2 Treatises on this old music written in the thirteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries are still available. Since the oral tradition of performance is comparatively little concerned with the written parts, it is probable that the latter, preserved in three different notations for flute, mouth-organ, and bass lute, are authentic relics. This is also suggested by the notations themselves, which have Tarng and Sonq parallels. As an example of the melodies inherent in the written parts, but only to be recognized with difficulty in the music as performed today, Ex. 242 gives mouth-organ and biwa (p. 92) parts of the first phrase of the ‘Martial Virtue Music’ as transcribed from the Japanese notation, printed in facsimile by Harich-Schneider in an admirable first-hand account of Japanese court music.

Ex. 242

mouth-organ(shoo)

(o = open string)(• = pizzicato; othernotes with plectrum)

Ex. 242 only shows the notes as written; it does not include percussion, also shown in the original; nor does it indicate the figured-bass-like expansion of the biwa part or the mouth-organ chords erected on each degree of the scale. Ex. 242 may be compared with the full score prepared by Harich-Schneider. The resulting elaborate heterophony was first displayed in score by Mueller3 who was able to test

1 See examples in Piggott, op. cit., p. 103. 2 Harich-Schneider, op. cit., p. 65.

3 L. Mueller, ‘Einige Notizen über die japanische Musik’, Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens in Tokio, i 6 (Tokyo, 1874), pp. 13–20, i 8 (1875), pp. 41–48, i 9 (1876), pp. 19–35.

Page 189

148 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

each performer separately. A version of the ceremonial ‘Etenraku’ (180) (‘Music coming through from Heaven’) for a Western orchestra has been prepared,1 and a number of modern studies of the vestiges of Tarng and Swei music surviving in Japan are available.2

On the whole, the Chinese musical instruments of Japan are those of the Tarng court orchestras rather than those of the Confucian ritual. There seems to be no counterpart in Japan of the Jou orchestra preserved in Korea, for example, though a number of very early Chinese instruments have survived in the incomparable treasure-house of the Shoosoin at Nara. This collection includes a Chinese chyn of the fifth century.3 What is perhaps the most ancient Japanese music—that of the temple dances and of the Noo (182) plays—makes use of flute or flutes and drums only, and seems to point to an even earlier musical substratum than that associated with the Shang culture in the Yellow River valley in the second millennium B.C.

Of considerable musical interest is the structure of the archaic lyric drama known as Noo, which reached the peak of its development in A.D. 1500, though in its use of masks and stylized expression it seems to hark back to a period earlier than the fifteenth century. The Noo orchestra consists of one stick-beaten and two hand-beaten drums and a cross-flute. While the drums maintain a regular rhythm, the voice moves to a large extent arhythmically and is only rarely supported by the flute, which for the most part provides interludes. Certain standard melodic patterns are introduced into a chant otherwise at one pitch—though this may change from time to time.4 A very characteristic feature is the shift in level of the voice by steps of a fourth, often by two fourths in succession. The notation of the Noo music is a flute notation. Like the Chinese drama of Yuan times, the texts of the Noo repertoire have considerable literary merit. The most famous, by the fifteenth-century writer Seami, have been studied extensively.5

The music for the solo instrument known as the yamada koto (178), essentially a large jeng with thirteen silk strings, has been the subject6

1 H. and N. Konoye, Etenraku (Tokyo, 1935).

2 K. Hayashi, Swei-Tarng Yannyuehdiaw Yanjioiu (181) (Shanghai, 1936) (Chinese translation); H. Tanabe, Nihon Ongaku Kōwa (Tokyo, 1926).

3 R. H. van Gulik, The Lore of the Chinese Lute (Tokyo, 1940), pp. 181–9.

4 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 136.

5 N. Peri, ‘Études sur le drame lyrique japonais’, Bulletin de l’école française de l’ex-trême orient, ix (Hanoy, 1909), pp. 251, 707; also succeeding volumes. A. Waley, The Nō Plays of Japan (London, 1921).

6 Piggott, op. cit., p. 88. Examples of koto music are recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 9.

Page 190

of a special study. This is the most highly developed of the many

Japanese board-zithers and its music is largely in the various major

third modes. The style was fully elaborated in the seventeenth century,

when a blind musician, Yamazumi, created the various modern

forms. The same constructional principles are to be detected in

slighter, less elaborate and more popular melodies.1 A short phrase

of perhaps five notes serves as the basis of the entire composition,

undergoing transposition and every kind of variation in the process

of elaboration. This is music conceived largely in terms of the instru-

ment and arising out of its mechanical properties; in particular the

extended form known as danmono (179) is purely instrumental. An

attractive feature is the use of arpeggios of the set of thirteen strings

tuned to the characteristic major third scales. The following is from

the first verse of ‘The Plum Branch’ :2

Ex. 243

When accompanying the voice, the koto approximately follows the

voice and maintains the rhythm if the voice sustains a note; it may

supply two-note intervals—octaves, perfect or diminished fifths,

fourths, thirds and seconds—to increase sonority.

An excellent account of Japanese Buddhist cantillation is available.3

The music is undoubtedly Chinese in origin, but elaborate ornamen-

tation leads to a single syllable being sung to a group of notes instead

of to a single note, as in the Chinese Confucian hymns. The notation

(of which there are various forms) includes symbols indicative of the

pitch of the main note to which a syllable is sung, and more or less

graphic neums indicating voice movements during the execution of

the ornaments about the main note. In the following fragment the

numerals mark the essential degrees of the scale (Ex. 244).

1 Ibid., p. 102. See also Tokyo Academy of Music, Collection of Japanese Koto Music,

(Tokyo, 1888).

2 Ibid., p. 90.

P. Demiéville, Hôbôgirin (Tokyo, 1930); see article ‘Bombai’ Tôyô Ongaku Kenkyû,

xii-xiii (Tokyo, 1954), is largely devoted to essays on Buddhist music.

Page 191

150 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

Ex. 244

MIAU

Leaving the peoples of countries bordering on north China, we must now consider the music of various non-Chinese peoples living in southern China and the highlands of Burma and Indo-China. The anthropological and ethnological relationships of these peoples are complex, and no attempt will be made to classify them.

The Miau (10) are a large group of tribes scattered over southern China and the highlands of Annam. To them are related the Yau (11) and perhaps some of the Thai-speaking peoples of Haenan (183) and the border country of China and Indo-China. In certain respects their culture presents features reminiscent of the earliest records of Chinese civilization. The antiphonal courtship songs of the Miau have been compared with similar songs in the Book of Songs (Shyjing)1 but this comparison has not gone unchallenged.2

The most striking feature of the music of the Miau tribes is the use of large mouth-organs resembling the Chinese sheng. Among the Chingmiau (184) of Gueyjou Province the sheng have six pipes, the

1 M. Granet, Fêtes et chansons de la Chine ancienne (Paris, 1926), p. 147.

2 B. Karlgren, 'Glosses on the Kuo Feng Odes', The Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities Bulletin No. 14 (Stockholm, 1942), pp. 71-247. See p. 75.

Page 192

longest of which may be 4 feet in length (pl. 6 (b)). In other tribes still larger specimens occur, up to 13 feet in length, but the largest forms often have only three pipes. The free reeds are cut from thin copper. The six-pipe sheng of the Chingmiau is fairly accurately tuned to the scale D F G A C D, beginning on the D below middle C; this is the Chinese la mode on F. A small blob of wax may be stuck on to the tongue to modify the frequency of vibration.

At least two men play at a time and while playing they lead an open, square, or round dance with the women following. The pace of the music is always a leisurely andante, even when the performers are leaping about with considerable speed and energy. The effect is grave and moving; this is a music with none of the uncertain pitch of Chinese opera or flexible rhythm of Chinese zither music.

Since the six pipes are played in groups of two or three at a time, as with the Chinese sheng, it is understandable that the music has a very limited melodic range. Ex. 245 was written down from a performance by members of the Chingmiau tribe a few miles outside Anshuenn in Gueyjou.:

Ex. 245

The alternation of sucking and blowing is approximately indicated by the accents. A change in timbre between chords produced in these two ways adds to the quality of the music in a manner which cannot be guessed from the score. The phrasing suggested is not authentic; it is merely the sort of phrasing of which the performers made use. Since the pipes used for producing the middle voice in Ex. 245 (that is, A, G, and F) and the lowest pipe, D, are those with greatest resonance, the middle voice stands out in performance. Variety is obtained by varying the middle part; wherever possible, fourths and fifths are added above and below, as shown in the example.

In one dance the rhythm of the steps only coincided with that of the music to the extent that twenty steps were fitted to twenty quavers of Ex. 245. The distribution of accented stamping steps in

Page 193

152 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

the twenty-step unit (checked repeatedly during the performance) was as follows:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

At times the second quaver of the ligatures was dotted, giving a 'Scottish snap' to the movement. The players tended to break off on the interval CG.

While this is the music played at the New Year Mating Festival in the second fortnight of February, corresponding to the Old Style Chinese New Year, music of another kind may be heard on market days, when the Miau come into the Chinese towns from their villages. The following is a fragment of a melody played in unison on two six-holed cross-flutes by two men who stood facing each other; it contains a major third tetrachord and would be converted into the Japanese mode hirazyoosi if the octave G were added:

Ex. 246

Ex. 247 is a remarkable three-note tune1 from the Yau people of Lienyang in Canton Province:

Ex. 247

Some of the Miau tribes use a Jew's harp;2 though no description of this instrument is given, many of the peoples of countries bordering on southern China have a bamboo Jew's harp, and it is certain that this is one of the very ancient instruments common to the whole area (p. 185).

The fourteen-pipe mouth-organs of the people of Laos in northern

1 Hwang Yeoudih, 'Lienyang Yauren-di Inyueh', Minswu, i (4) (Canton, 1942), pp. 28-35. 2 F. Savina, Histoire des Miao (Hong Kong, 1924), p. 25.

Page 194

MIAU

153

Annam are made in three sizes: mezzo-soprano, contralto, and baritone, and in sweetness and clarity they are said to surpass both Dyak mouth-organ and Chinese sheng. Ex. 248 (‘The Possessed’) is written on three staves, but whether played by three instruments is not clear:1

Ex. 248

Some of the examples show that the instrument may also be used entirely melodically: to play a one-line melody without chords or with only occasional chords or a pedal-point.1,2

In the highlands of Burma and the country of the Yunnan-Burma

1 M. Humbert-Lavergne, ‘La Musique à travers la vie laotienne’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, ii (1934), pp. 14–19. Laotian mouth-organ music is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 6.

2 G. Knosp, ‘Histoire de la musique dans l’Indo-Chine’, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3100–46. See p. 3145.

Page 195

154 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

border are the Karen people, possibly related to the Miau and possibly (though doubtfully) belonging to the Sino-Tibetan language-group. They make use of mouth-organs not inferior in size to those of the Miau,1 though differing from these in that they lack a mouth-piece a foot or more in length.

LUOLUO AND MINJIA

While the Miau and Karen are only doubtfully included in the Sino-Tibetan language-group, the Luoluo (6) are unquestionably members of the Tibeto-Burman branch. Those in the vicinity of Lihjiang (185) in south-western Yunnan, belonging to the Mosuo (7) group, have been studied by Professor Fuh Mawji (186) formerly of Hwajong (187) University, to whom I am indebted for specimens of their bamboo Jew's harps and of their tunes.2 The first type consists of a single vibrating tongue, cut in a length of bamboo; it vibrates in a long narrow slit and is set in motion by jerking the end of a short length of silk-gut attached to one end, while holding the other firm by a loop of silk. The instrument is held across the mouth, in front of but not touching the parted lips. By varying the shape and capacity of the mouth-cavity, selected partials of the fundamental are reinforced—as in playing all types of Jew's harp.

A more interesting type of Jew's harp consists of three tuned vibrators, each yielding a note of fixed pitch. In this case the vibrators are excited by plucking a slender projection on the free end (pl. 6 (c)). The three notes are, judged by ear, from above down: F sharp, D sharp (both above middle C) and the G sharp below middle C; they are clear and musical in quality.3 The player not only changes the shape of the mouth but alters the position of the tongue, as if articulating the words. Young men and women are able to exchange messages using this instrument as a generator of sound, modified by the changing properties of the mouth cavity as a resonator, as in speech.

Two popular three-note tunes, played on the triple Jew's harp, have been written down by Professor Fuh. The first, in ternary measure, is called ‘The Bees Fly across the Golden Sand River’:

Ex. 249

1 Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), p. 184 and pl. X d.

2 See also J. F. Rock, ‘The Romance of 3K'A-3MÂ-1GYU-3MI-3GKYI', Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, xxxix (Hanoy, 1939), pp. 1–152; in particular pp. 2–5, 7–13, and 122.

3 Another specimen is tuned F sharp, D sharp, and C sharp.

Page 196

LUOLUO AND MINJIA

155

The second, in common time, is ‘A Dog Follows a Deer’. The unit is repeated over and over again, sometimes at great speed.

Ex. 250

Among the Lihjiang Mosuo the Jew’s harp plays an important part in the courtship pattern of the community.1 With another Tibeto-Burman people, the Minjia (188),2 now considerably sinicized, living about a hundred miles south of Lihjiang, on the Eelhae (189), the Jew’s harp is only a children’s toy. It is a small version of the first type described from the Mosuo, but with a cloven tongue (pl. 6 (d)).

NAGAS

Away to the west, over the southern continuation of the Himalaya range, are people who belong to the central and southern Assamese division of the Tibeto-Burman family: the Nagas. Their musical instruments include a bamboo Jew’s harp with a single vibrating unit, almost identical with those of the Lihjiang Mosuo and of the Minjia, and played in the same way; a flute; a fiddle,3 and slit-drums—the last often of gigantic size.4 5 The Sema Nagas have no slit drums, though they make use of various struck or shaken idiophones for non-musical purposes, but they have a two-holed cross-flute and a bamboo Jew’s harp. The following example is a three-part chorus sung by these people.6

Ex. 251

1 See Rock, op. cit.

2 For a general account of this people (not, however, of any musical interest) see C. P. Fitzgerald, The Tower of Five Glories (London, 1941).

3 C. von Fürer Haimendorf, The Naked Nagas (Calcutta, 1946), fig. 49.

4 Ibid., figs. 38, 39. 5 Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments, p. 30 and pl. Ib.

6 J. H. Hutton, The Sema Nagas (London, 1921), p. 370.

Page 197

156 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

ANNAM1

The urban music of Annam is very largely sinicized.1.2 In the towns the instruments in use are Chinese, or variants of Chinese instruments, and (with the exception of single sonorous stones or metal slabs) all belong to the ‘modern’ category, that is, they are instruments imported into China in T'ang times or later. The instruments of the Confucian orchestra survive only as illustrations in early books, or as rare specimens, no longer played, in the imperial palace; even the sheng has been forgotten in Annam.

Of the tunes and fragments available, none exhibit any trace of the major third scale noted in Tibet, Korea, and Japan; with one exception all are ‘Chinese’, and all but two are strictly pentatonic. While the do mode is the most frequent, examples in other modes also occur. The following is a popular fiddle tune (for a fiddle of ellhwu-type, p. 93) entitled ‘Running Water’:3

Ex. 252

A tune of unusually regular sequential structure is the following ‘Spring Breeze’4 (Ex. 253).

3 Knosp, ‘Histoire de la musique dans l'Indo-Chine’ p. 3100.

2 G. de Gironcourt, ‘Recherches de géographie musicale en Indochine’, Bulletin de la société des études indochinoises, Nouvelle Série, xvi, No. 4 (Saigon, 1942), pp. 7–174.

3 Knosp, op. cit., p. 3104.

4 Ibid., p. 3105.

Page 198

Ex. 253

ANNAM

157

Knosp gives an interesting account of improvisation and examples of characteristic turns of phrase, including the following with its chain of fourths :1

Ex. 254

All the examples so far quoted are in duple or quadruple time. A remarkable specimen is the following hexatonic tune in triple time; this tune is more Indian in character than Chinese.2

Ex. 255

Some features of the material collected by Knosp suggest the presence of a more ancient ethnic substratum in Annam, and this suggestion has been fully confirmed by more recent studies.3 In rural areas, and in particular among the Sedang people, north of Kontum, an entire armoury of primitive bamboo instruments and stone chimes is in use. There are even hydraulic orchestras, actuated by the overflow from irrigation channels, including slit-drums, clappers, xylophones, stone-chimes, and a bowed gourd; two or more instruments, playing rhythmically and melodically differentiated parts, are mechanically co-ordinated so as to play continuously. To this list of archaic

1 Knosp, ‘Histoire de la musique dans l’Indo-Chine’, p. 3106.

2 Ibid., p. 3103.

3 G. de Gironcourt, op. cit.

Page 199

158 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

instruments may be added two forms of ground-zither, played by men only and used to accompany courtship-songs.1

The specimens of rural music available display archaic features as striking as the instruments. The following example is the antiphonal vocalization of a waterman and his wife, as heard at dusk on the Hue River.2 It makes use of four notes only, distributed over a range of one and a half octaves; the repeated drop of a fourth is striking:

Ex. 256

Superposed fifths are also to be heard:3

Ex. 257

Pure expanded-triad melodies occur, such as, for example, this lullaby from Phuc-tho:3

Ex. 258

Even in urban music there are traces of an early substratum in funeral music. The following example is played on a double-oboe with reeds made from the pupal skin of a certain insect; the two components are tuned so that each ‘note’ is an interval of a minor second. This

1 Knosp, ‘Histoire de la musique dans l’Indo-Chine’ p. 3117.

2 Ibid., p. 3126.

3 G. de Gironcourt, op. cit.

Page 200

instrument is doubled by a true oboe. The fragment is repeated indefinitely:1

Ex. 259

The ‘fanfared’ character of this example (p. 178) suggests that it derives from the same ancient substratum as Ex. 258. Such expanded triad melodies are characteristic of certain primitive peoples in New Guinea. The existence in Annam of many ancient instruments, including two of the oldest chordophones known, and of a great variety of non-Chinese types of melodic utterance, is compatible with what is known from other sources of the ethnological complexity of this region. It is of interest that one type of ground-zither preserved in Annam occurs also in the southern Sudan among the Nuer.2

CAMBODIA

One account of Cambodian music3 records that these people neither sing in the street nor play single instruments, though they possess a sonorous orchestra of instruments of superb workmanship. It may be, however, that this author was unfortunate in his contacts, since there is available from another source a collection of fifty-four songs, both words and music, from all the provinces of Cambodia.4 More recently a further collection of twenty-one songs, and a number of specimens of rural music (work-songs, &c.), and also of aboriginal music from the most primitive inhabitants, have been published.5

Although the Khmers, ancestors of the Cambodians, were raised to a high cultural level for a thousand years by Indian colonists reaching Cambodia at the beginning of our era, the musical culture of their descendants, unlike that of Burma, shows very little Indian influence.

Of the fifty-four songs transcribed,4 two only are based on major third scales; half of the remainder are purely pentatonic minor third scales, half are hexatonic with minor third tetrachords; only a few are heptatonic. Some of those in the hexatonic group make only occasional use of the semitone. With few exceptions they are all in common time.

1 Knosp, ‘Histoire de la musique dans l’Indo-Chine’, p. 3109.

2 A. N. Tucker, Tribal Music and Dancing in the Southern Sudan (Africa) (London, n.d.), p. 13.

3 Knosp, op. cit., p. 3129.

4 A. Tricon and Ch. Bellan, Chansons cambodgiennes (Saigon, 1921).

5 G. de Gironcourt, op. cit. A Cambodian lullaby is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 5.

Page 201

160

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

The following example exhibits the plagal form of the mode hirazyoosi (to use the Japanese name); the upper tetrachord is occasionally filled in. This and other examples appear to be syllabic:

Ex. 260 ‘Dâmbang dèk’ (‘Iron Rod’ or ‘Small and Tender’)

Moderato

The first part of the next example is in plagal iwato with the lower tetrachord occasionally filled in; in the tenth bar it modulates to a different genus and key, returning to a major third tetrachordal structure in the last two bars:

Ex. 261 ‘Peak pràmpel’ (‘Seven Words’)

Lento

A number of the songs in the collection have four equal notes to the bar throughout, dotted notes or notes of two or three times the unit value being absent or few, as in the following example:

Ex. 262 ‘Bok srou’ (‘Rice-pounding Song’)

Moderato

Page 202

CAMBODIA

161

The following four bars resemble the most ancient surviving Chinese melodies:

Ex. 263

In most of the songs, however, dotted ligatures replace single notes here and there, though the four-beat rhythm is maintained.

Ex. 264

The following is a more highly organized tune:

Ex. 265

Ex. 266 is a royal funeral chant sung antiphonally by soloist and chorus accompanied by oboe and two drums:1

Ex. 266

While popular rural tunes may show major-third tetrachords and occasionally ‘filled-in’ tetrachords, the aboriginal music in some instances exhibits pure ‘fanfared’ melodies.1

Cambodia has been included in the group of countries of eastern Asia where chime-instruments tend to have an equal-tempered octave

1 G. de Gironcourt, ‘Motifs de chants cambodgiens’, Bulletin de la société des études indochinoises, nouvelle série, xvi, No. 1 (Saigon, 1941), pp. 51–105.

B 3608

M

Page 203

162 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

of seven equidistant notes, each of which can serve as a locus of inversion for pentatonic scales.1

The 21 instruments in use in Cambodia include 2 xylophones of 21 and 17 keys respectively and a chime of 21 bronze plates; 2 gong chimes, the one an octave higher than the other; 3 long lutes; 3 fiddles, of which one is a spike-fiddle of Persian origin; a stick-zither with a gourd as resonator; an oboe and a flute; cymbals, 4 different types of drum, and clappers of wood.2 The striking difference, as compared with the Annamese orchestra, is the presence of various chimes. The stick-zither is not an orchestral instrument; it is unquestionably of great antiquity, like the ground-harp and zither of the Annamese.

There are 2 court orchestras, one of male, the other of female, performers. In the former, out of 11 instruments, 5 are chimes (gongs and xylophones are the chief melodic instruments), 2 are flutes, one is a spike-fiddle and the rest are percussion. To the 5 chimes, the women's orchestra adds 6 different stringed instruments. The following 3 bars illustrate in short score a point at which heterophony becomes harmony:3

Ex. 267

SIAM (THAILAND)

Not until the end of the fourteenth century did Siam become a political unit under the leadership of Thai conquerors from the border country adjoining Yunnan, but by the end of the following century the new unit had conquered Cambodia and annexed the Malayan Peninsula. Prior to the end of the fourteenth century, the area later to become Siam was occupied by a group of states all strongly influenced by Indian culture; in certain regions this influence was predominantly Hindu, but for the most part it was Buddhist 3

1 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 132.

2 Knosp, op. cit., p. 3131.

J. Auboyer, 'L'Indochine' in L'Asie orientale des origines au XVe siècle (R. Grousset) (Paris, 1941), pp. 378 ff.

Page 204

SIAM (THAILAND)

163

The tonal system of the Siamese was one of the first Far Eastern systems to receive attention from the West.1 It may even be said that Siam achieved a certain notoriety among musicologists when it was discovered that the system of the Siamese tends towards equal temperament of an unusual type: the octave is divided into seven equal parts. Generally speaking their tunes do not make use of all seven steps but of five only, skipping two to produce pentatonic scales that the Western ear interprets as ‘Chinese’ pentatonic scales of major seconds and minor thirds. Three modes are used, corresponding to the Chinese do, sol, and la modes.

When subjected to physical measurement this tempering is found to be far from accurate, and singers appear to take little notice of instrumental temperament. One recording includes a passage in which the singer makes use of almost Western intervals, but alternates with an orchestra playing in the tempered scale.2 In this recording the singer is never accompanied but alternates with orchestral ritornelli.

The Siamese orchestra seems to be almost identical with that of Cambodia.3 In a recording in the Music of the Orient series4 the Siamese orchestra is in fact identical with the Cambodian male orchestra of the palace. An entire composition was transcribed by Stumpf5 and has recently been reprinted by Davison and Apel.6 Ex. 220, taken from Seelig,7 is a tune (No. 17(b) in that collection) entitled ‘The Slim Cambodian’.

Ex. 268

1 A. J. Ellis, ‘Musical Scales of Various Nations’, Journal of the Society of Arts (27 March 1885); C. Stumpf, ‘Tonsystem und Musik der Siamesen’, Sammelbände für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (1922), pp. 129–77.

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 133.

3 Phra Chen Duriyanga, Siamese Music (Bangkok, n.d.).

4 E. M. von Hornbostel, Music of The Orient (Record M.O. 107) (Parlophone, London).

5 Stumpf, op. cit., pp. 171 ff.

6 A. T. Davison and W. Apel, Historical Anthology of Music, i (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1947), p. 4.

7 For a collection of 150 melodies see P. J. Seelig, Siamesische Musik (Bandoeng, 1932).

Page 205

164

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

BURMA

From such transcriptions as are available1 and from the constitution of Burmese orchestras, there seems little doubt that Indian influence predominates in the music of Lower Burma. The characteristic Burmese orchestra is that accompanying plays in which the shadows of two-dimensional puppets are projected on a screen. It consists of two pairs of clappers, two pairs of cymbals, a gong-chime (like those of Siam and Cambodia), a drum-chime, a large drum, and two oboes (see pl. 7 (b)).2 Omitting the gong-chime, this is the sort of instrumental ensemble to be met with in southern India. It may be mentioned that Burmese orchestras were known to the Tarng court, and that the Tarngshu (190) contains an account of Burmese music.

The Burmese apply the term ‘Chinese’ to their pentatonic melodies;1 and these form but a small part of the repertoire. The following is interesting in relation to some of the Cambodian tunes: if the rests are filled in with repeated notes the resulting melody closely resembles Ex. 262 (p. 160):

Ex. 269

Another ‘Chinese’ tune differs from classical Chinese tunes in the way it is built up in a square, predictable manner:

Ex. 270

Practically all the tunes quoted are symmetrical in structure; some of them have that exciting rhythmic quality which one associates with Indian drumming. Here is a tune with a conspicuous major third-minor second tetrachord, but with the semitone above (Ex. 271).

1 G. Knosp, ‘La Birmanie’ in Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3094–9. See also F. Bose, Musikalische Völkerkunde (Freiburg i. Br., 1953), p. 129 and examples 53 and 54.

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 153.

Page 206

Ex. 271

The melody has a non-Far-Eastern character in that the strong accent falls almost invariably on a note of the tonic chord of D major.

JAVA, SUMATRA, AND NIAS

The music of Java has been the subject of several memoirs of outstanding importance.1 No part of the world, other than Japan, shows such a predilection for major third scales as does the Malay Archipelago; and in west Java (culturally the most primitive part of the island) singers perform in scales with two disjunct major third tetrachords, comparable to the Japanese mode kumoizyoosi. Instruments and whole orchestras are tuned to scales which include one or more major thirds, as in Exs. 272 (Sachs) and 273 (Groneman and Land); this major third pentatonic genus, pelog, is to be found not only throughout Java, but in Bali as well:

Ex. 272

When the pitch of successive notes in these scales is accurately measured, it is found that, on the same instrument, one third is not the same size as another, and seconds may be of several sizes. The reason for this is that the orchestras consist almost exclusively of idiophones tuned by comparison with standard metal bars kept by the gong-founders. Neither the cycle of fifths nor the harmonic division of strings is known to these people; their scales are duplicated, not constructed.2

1 J. Groneman and J. P. N. Land, De Gamelan te Jogjakard (Amsterdam, 1890); D. de Lange and F. F. Snnelleman, ‘La Musique et les instruments de musique dans les Indes orientales néerlandaises’, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, v, pp. 3147-78. Jaap Kunst, De Toonkunst van Java (The Hague, 1934); Music in Java (The Hague, 1949); M. Hood, The Nuclear Theme as a Determinant of Patet in Javanese Music (Groningen and Djakarta, 1954).

2 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 129.

Page 207

166

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

In order to allow more than one mode to be played within the same range, the idiophones of the pelog-orchestras are given seven notes; this series may be approximately represented as follows, starting from E: E F G A B C D. Although there were originally three ‘female’ (pelog) modes, nem, lima, and barang, much of the lima-material now available shows nem-characteristics.1

Ex. 273 pelog patet nem2

Corresponding to the Chinese minor third pentatonic genus, the Javanese also have a ‘masculine’ genus, salendro or slendro, taking its name from the Indian dynasty of the Sailendra which ruled Java from the end of the eighth until the end of the tenth century. The two genera—pelog and slendro—are played by different sets of instruments in different orchestras. In effect, melodies in slendro sound to the Western ear like Chinese pentatonic melodies; but the octave in fact tends to be divided into five equal steps. The tuning of old instruments excavated in Java suggests, however, that there was a time when the octave was divided into steps approaching three major seconds and two minor thirds. It has been suggested that, whereas in the West, equal temperament arose from the need for freedom of transposition, in Java, it arose from the attempt to play melodies in different modes in the same range on instruments of fixed pitch.3

A recent study4 has shown that both slendro and pelog are essentially non-equidistant scale-systems. The results imply that the tendency to equal temperament has been overstressed. Furthermore, contrary to earlier views, pelog and slendro modes can be distinguished by their structure—by the position of tonic and dominant, and by their characteristic cadences, themselves determined by the limited range of the dominant chime-idiophone. The parallel with cadential formulae in the Tarng (?) melodies of Ju Shii (p. 109) is striking.

The following example is in the slendro mode nem.2

Ex. 274

1 Hood, op. cit., pp. 194 ff.

2 De Lange and Snellerman, op. cit., p. 3156; taken from Groneman and Land, op. cit., pp. 57 and 78.

3 Sachs, The Rise of Music, pp. 131, 132.

4 Hood, op. cit.

Page 208

JAVA, SUMATRA, AND NIAS

167

It seems probable that the names for the modes were invented in

relation to the major third pentatonic genus pelog and it is now accepted

that this is the older genus.

Like Cambodian and Siamese orchestras, the Javanese orchestra

or gamelan includes the Persian spike-fiddle known as the rebab; this

instrument leads and is responsible for the prelude and for announc-

ing the melody which forms the basis of the whole composition. The

Javanese also have a solo reed instrument, a type of oboe, the selom-

pret, but this does not form part of the gamelan.

In addition to the gong-chimes the Javanese make use of a number

of celesta-like metallophones constructed on a plan similar to that of

Indo-Chinese xylophones, but with flat metal plates replacing the

wooden slats of the former. Both gong-chimes and at least one type

of celesta (the gender) incorporate tuned resonators in their struc-

ture. As in the orchestras on the mainland, several solitary gongs of

large size are also used. The gamelan includes one instrument not

represented in the Cambodian armoury; this is a board zither of

fourteen strings tuned to a pelog scale of two octaves.

In west Java a number of primitive instruments occur. The chime-

idiophones among these are all made of wood; some are suspended

xylophones of tubes or laths of bamboo. In those made with tubes,

these are closed below and cut away at the open end until only a

long, more or less flat, vibratile tongue, tuned to the pitch of the

tube, remains. This form of tube is the same as that found in the

other type of idiophone, the angkleng. In this, two or more tubes

tuned at the octave are arranged in a wooden frame in such a way

that they can slide in slots, and are caused to emit their charac-

teristic notes by striking against the end of the slots; a number

of such frames, each of two or three tubes, may be arranged in a

chime.

In Java occurs the first example we have met of a primitive zither

constructed entirely of bamboo. This is the tube-zither, ketoeng-

ketoeng.1 It consists of an internode of bamboo together with its two

adjacent nodes. Round the periphery of the cylinder are a number

of 'strings' formed by lifting up strips of the outer layers of the tube

itself, and tuned by inserting small blocks of wood under the 'string'

at each end. A hole is cut in the wall of the tube, so that the cavity

acts as a resonator (pl. 6 (e)). Another primitive instrument is the

set of panpipes, consisting of ten or twenty reeds, closed below, and

1 The figure in de Lange and Snnelman, op. cit., p. 3168 is wrongly labelled soeling;

the soeling is a vertical flute, cf. ibid., p. 3149.

Page 209

168

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

assembled in such a way that their open ends can be blown across in sequence.

A full score of an entire composition for a gamelan of twelve different instruments has been prepared;1 it includes ten distinct melodic voices. Except for a greater range, the theme itself is indistinguishable from Prince Tzayyuh's examples of the earliest Chinese ritual music (p. 102). It is as follows:

Ex. 275

Da Capo

Two bars of the full score are shown in Ex. 276.

Recent work has revealed a correspondence between the vibration frequencies of certain early Javanese metallophones and the vibration frequencies of particular modes on reed pipes.2 The results suggest that some of these early metallophones must have been tuned to a note series generated by a pipe. The suggestion is of the greatest importance, not only because it implies that at some period in the past the Javanese had a means of generating scales instead of copying them, but also because it raises the question whether pentatonic genera of some kind necessarily precede heptatonic and heptatonic genera in time.

In striking contrast to Javanese orchestras, none of the four different orchestras of northern Sumatra contains idiophonic chimes; all have single idiophones (gongs), percussion and a solo instrument of some kind—flute, clarinet, rebab, or other fiddle. This suggests Arab or Indian influence and might perhaps be correlated with the early conversion of this part of the island to Islam. Marco Polo records the existence of a Mohammedan state in west Sumatra as early as 1292.3 Among the more primitive peoples of the island, the idiophonic chime occurs in the form of a xylophone of bamboo laths; there is also a bamboo tube-zither, a two-stringed short lute, and a bamboo Jew's harp resembling those of the Naga, Mosuo and Minjia.

1 De Lange and Snellerman, op. cit., pp. 3160–4; taken from Groneman and Land, op. cit., p. 105.

2 Kathleen Schlesinger, The Greek Aulos (London, 1939), pp. 334ff.

3 The Travels of Marco Polo. Book III, ch. xi.

Page 210

JAVA, SUMATRA, AND NIAS

169

Ex. 276

Rebab

Xylophone

(Gambang)

Celesta with

resonators of

bamboo (Gendèr)

Celesta

(Saron)

Celesta

(Demung)

Gong-chimes

I & II

Gong-chime

III

Zither

Drum

Two Gongs

Two Kettle-gongs

Page 211

170

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

A detailed account of the music of Nias, an island off the west coast

of Sumatra, has been given.1 The inhabitants of the southern districts

are closely related to the Nagas. They exhibit a remarkable type of

anhemitonic, tetratonic, vocal melody of the range of a tritone

and usually in three-beat measures. The instruments of the island in-

clude single gongs; a three- or four-keyed xylophone, the keys of

which rest on the thighs of the performer sitting over a trench; a

remarkable aerophone consisting of a bamboo 'tuning fork', the tube

of which selects and reinforces the fourth or fifth upper partial of the

fundamental; idiochordic tube-zithers with one to four strings, struck

or plucked; a Jew's harp; an idioglottal free-reed pipe; a nose-flute

and other flutes. The following example is a transcription of the gong

music played in central Nias on festal occasions. The original score

includes three drums:

Ex. 277

BALI

No part of the non-Western musical world has received more sym-

pathetic treatment from Western musicologists than the small island

of Bali, next in sequence to Java in the chain of the Archipelago.2 In

contrast to Java which, from contact with Muslim India, was pre-

dominantly under the influence of Islam in the fifteenth century, Bali,

having rejected Buddhism at a very early date, escaped the Islamic

influence and remains to this day essentially Hindu. The ritual orches-

tras make no use, however, of instruments associated elsewhere with

Hindu influence.

The classical orchestra, originally used only in the ceremonies con-

nected with cremation, is composed almost exclusively of idiophones;

1 Kunst, 'Music in Nias', Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie, xxxviii (Leiden,

1940), pp. 1-89 and p. 26 in particular.

2 J. Kunst and C. J. A. Kunst-Wely, De toonkunst van Bali (Weltevreden, 1925).

C. McPhee, 'The Balinese wajang koelit and its music', Djawa, xvi (Jogjàkartà, 1936);

'Angkloeng gamelans in Bali', Djawa, xvii (Jogjàkartà, 1937); A House in Bali (New York,

1944).

Page 212

BALI

171

the only non-idiophonic instruments are the drums. The scale

of the instruments is of four notes only. In many of the classical

orchestras (gamelans)1 the idiophones are entirely metallophones;

but in certain parts of Bali the classical gamelan includes wooden

idiophones: angkloengs and two types of xylophones. Even when

angkloengs are absent the classical gamelan is referred to as gamelan

Angkloeng.2

The keyed metallophones are of two types: those in which the keys

are suspended freely over the resonators; and those in which they

rest on some damping material over the resonators. The former are

the gendèrs, the latter, the gangsas. On the whole it is the gendèr type

which is used in gamelan Angkloeng. Each gendèr has four keys within

the range of an octave, and there are large, medium, and small

gendèrs, tuned an octave apart. The gamelan includes a pair of the

largest size and four (two pairs) of each of the other two sizes. The

members of these pairs are tuned so that there is a difference in pitch

—which may be as large as three-eighths of a tone in the large

instruments—between corresponding keys; the effect of this is to

give a bell-like sonority to the higher registers and a throbbing

intensity to the lower.3

The remaining metallophones are the réjongs and gongs. A réjong

is a pair of tuned kettle-gongs mounted one at each end of a wooden

handle, and tuned a second or a minor third apart. They are played

in pairs by two players, who between them cover the whole of the

four-note scale. It is known from bas-reliefs that such réjongs existed

in Java at least as early as the fourteenth century. Each gamelan also

has a single gong, lower in pitch than the lowest note of the large

gendèrs and tuned to a note which is not of the scale, but which

roughly converts the four-note scale into a pentatonic scale. Thus if

the scale is G A B D, the gong might be any note between Eb and F#.

A second small gong is tuned to one of the notes of the scale but at

a high pitch. Cymbals and two small drums, tuned a second apart,

complete the gamelan.

Remarkably enough, the scale of the gamelan Angkloeng: G A B D,

the 123.5 sequence of the commonest Chinese mode, common to so

many primitive peoples, is considered by the Balinese to be identical

with the four chief notes produced by a Jew’s harp, gènggong:

G Bb C D, that is 134.5, and tunes for the one are played on the

other.4

1 A gamelan is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 7.

2 McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, p. 122. 3 Ibid., p. 128. 4 Ibid., p. 127.

Page 213

172 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

The nature of the parts played by the different instruments is as follows.1 Lowest in pitch is a canto fermo played on the largest gendèrs. This is in minims with a gong stroke at every ninth minim. Above this the higher pitched gendèrs play a melody in quavers based on the canto fermo, and above this the réjongs play a two- or three-part figuration in semiquavers. In the classical gamelan the line based on the canto fermo may disappear, and the higher pitched gendèrs may assist the réjongs in the figuration. The following example illustrates this figuration and its relation to the canto fermo:2

Ex. 278

The type of melody developed from the canto fermo is shown in the next example:3

Ex. 279

In bars three and four the genders occasionally split into two voices a fifth apart; because of their greater sonority the fifths stand out as a cross-rhythm in relation to the movement of the canto fermo. Similar fifths arise in the réjong figuration and give life to the music, just as does syncopated drumming within a fixed framework. There is a certain similarity between Balinese drumming technique and that of réjong playing; and also similarity in form between réjongs and Indian (and Japanese) hour-glass drums.4 It is possible that the polyrhythm of the figuration is not Far Eastern but Indian.5

The composition of an old-style gamelan Angkloeng is as follows.

1 McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, pp. 128 ff. 2 Ibid., p. 131. 3 Ibid., p. 135. 4 Ibid., p. 129. 5 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 139.

Page 214

BALl

173

The usual four-note metallophones and a single set of réjongs are supplemented by two small gangsas, four angkloengs, and two different kinds of xylophones: the grantang with angkloeng-like keys, and a simple xylophone without resonators, the tjoengklik. In this gamelan the réjongs and angkloengs are responsible for the figuration, the lowest gendèrs give out the canto fermo and the other keyed metallophones play the melody in unison. Grantang and tjoengklik each produce a different paraphrase of the melody. Only four of the nine staves of the original score are quoted here, omitting two staves of angkloengs, one of réjongs, one of cymbals, and one of drums.1 The third note of the series is a Bb in this example; this deviation is accepted as a mere change in intonation:

Ex. 280

1 McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, p. 138.

Page 215

174

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

Yet another tuning is found in a different gamelan. One of the melodies played by this gamelan is as follows:1

Ex. 281

The following two bars in full score (Ex. 282) illustrate the texture of another type of orchestra, the old-style ceremonial gamelan Gong, consisting exclusively of metallophones and drums.2 Here the gong-chime expounds a flowing five-note pelog melody (scale: G# A C# D E) and the cantus of the gendèrs receives a first amplification from the gangsas in double octaves. This example illustrates the extraordinary harmonic quality imparted by the punctuating gongs.

The pieces played by the gamelans nearly always consist of two sections: a ‘body’ (pengawak) followed by an Allegretto (pengètjèt).3 Each is introduced by a solo (the pengawit): a statement of the musical material which it introduces. Whereas the ‘body’ is a complete statement which does not require repetition, the Allegretto is meant to be repeated; its closing note is the note on which it opens, and it is in fact an ostinato of at least a dozen repeats. The pengawit intimates what piece is to be played and sets the pace.

Since the sixteenth century, the vowels of the five names of the notes (ding, dong, deng, doeng, and dang) have been used in Bali to record melodies. Though time values are not indicated, the metres are named.

1 McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, p. 141.

2 McPhee, ‘The Five-tone Gamelan Music of Bali’, The Musical Quarterly, xxxv (New York, 1949), pp. 250-81.

3 McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, p. 132.

Page 216

Ex. 282.

Ceremonial Gamelan Gong, Old Style

  1. metallophones, gangsa type;

  2. metallophones, gender type;

  3. cymbals;

  4. gong-chime, trompong soloist, 5, 6, and 7 punctuating

  5. 4-note

rèong

1st and 2nd players;

BALI

175

Page 217

176

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

The last example is an improvised pelog tune:1

Ex. 283

Three admirable transcriptions of Balinese gamelan music, for two pianos, have been published.2 One—‘Music for the Shadow Play’—is in the genus slendro: the other two are in pelog.

In Bali, Indian types of orchestra, consisting of rebab, flutes, cymbals, &c., are used for two purposes: one type accompanies the classic drama, Gamboeh, played in fourteenth-century Javanese, the themes of which are taken from romantic or mythical versions of Javanese history;3 and a similar orchestra of flute and percussion accompanies Ardja, a type of drama which draws to some extent on modern Chinese tales. In the latter the use of an instrumental accompaniment seems to be a relatively modern usage.4

OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO

There are two reasons for including the other islands of the Indian Archipelago in this account. First, there are islands where primitive forms of instruments already met elsewhere in more refined versions survive; it would be wrong to give the impression that the distribution of these instruments ceases abruptly in Java and Bali. Secondly, there are traces in this area of a musical culture profoundly different from that so far reviewed. Though the music of China at the present time differs from the ritual music of ancient China quite as much as it differs from the ritual music of the Balinese gamelan, all three have greater affinity with each other than they have with certain musical elements to be met with in the islands.

The ethnological picture of this region is of the utmost complexity; in New Guinea alone, there are hundreds of tribes of varying mixtures

1 McPhee, A House in Bali, p. 210.

2 McPhee, Balinese Ceremonial Music transcribed for Two Pianos, Four Hands: Pemoengkah; Gambangan; Taboe teloe (New York, 1940).

3 B. De Zoete and W. Spies, Dance and Drama in Bali (London, 1938), pp. 134 ff.; Gamboeh music is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 8.

4 Ibid., p. 196.

Page 218

OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO

of races with many and various cultural strata superimposed. The

evidence supports the view that there are in this area traces of a

different main stem of mankind, of a people more different from the

Mongoloids and the Proto- and Deutero-Malays than are these from

each other; and it is suggested that this fact is reflected in the total

musicological picture of this region. The most important work in this

field from the standpoint of comparative musicology is that of Kunst,1

though valuable information regarding instruments and the music of

certain tribes is to be found scattered through the anthropological

literature of this part of the world. A brief survey of the instruments

of the islands with some account of musical practices is included in

de Lange and Snellerman's article previously mentioned.

While many of the instruments recorded are such as we have already

encountered, there are others (many idiophones, certain flutes, certain

free aerophones) which are new and which are obviously primitive

instruments (in the sense of Sachs's classification). From the distribu-

tion of various instruments in this area, it is clear that New Guinea

and the adjacent islands constitute a region in which a high propor-

tion of these primitive instruments occurs. It is also in this region that

a type of music becomes conspicuous of which in this survey only

traces have hitherto been encountered.

Before coming to discuss the music of the Papuans, the occurrence

in Madagascar of stick-zithers with resonators (both plucked and

tapped), and of tube-zithers, should be mentioned; they were taken

thither by a Malay people (the Hovas) some time in the fifteenth

century.2 The tube-zither of the Hovas (valiha) has the strings tuned

for the most part in thirds (D F A, E G B) in a manner recalling one

tuning of the Japanese yamatogoto or wagon (191) (d A D G B E),

claimed by the Japanese as an entirely national instrument and said

to have been derived from six long-bows tied side by side.3 Chords

of thirds or sixths are frequently used in playing the valiha.

From Borneo (Sarawak) songs of great interest have been recorded

and transcribed;4 in some instances these combine an upper minor-

1

Kunst, A Study on Papuan Music (Weltevreden, 1931); Over zeldzame Fluiten en

veelstemmige Muziek in het Ngadaen Nageh-Gebied (West-Flores) (Batavia, 1931);

'Music in Nias'; 'Music in Flores', Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie, Supplement

to xlii (Leiden, 1942).

2

A. Sichel, 'Histoire de la musique des Malgaches' in Encyclopédie de la musique,

1re partie, v, pp. 3226-33. See also Sachs, 'Les instruments de musique de Madagas-

car', Travaux et mémoires de l'institut d'ethnologie, xxviii (Paris, 1938), and The History

of Music in Sound, i, side 5.

3

For a recent account see E. Harich-Schneider, op. cit, p. 57.

4

C. S. Myers, 'A Study of Sarawak Music', Sammelbände der internationalen

Musikgesellschaft, xv (1914), pp. 296-308.

B 3608

N

Page 219

178 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

third tetrachord with a lower major-third tetrachord with the semitone above. The following example, from the Long K iput tribe is of particular interest in relation to the style of antiphonal singing described from Tibet (p. 139):

Ex. 284

The major-third tetrachord with the semitone below is also displayed in music from Sarawak. Ex. 285 is a Kenyah dance-tune played on a six-pipe mouth-organ (keluri). The triple rhythm and pendulating tonic-dominant harmony are both noteworthy.

Ex. 285

The Papuans of the Nassau Range in New Guinea know no other musical instrument than the Jew’s harp, but they possess two entirely different types of melody.1 While the greater part of their melodies are primitive in the sense that their range does not as a rule exceed a fourth, others have a range of as much as an octave and are ‘fared’: that is to say, they are expanded common chords. Recordings from the Kauwerawet people of the Van Rees Mountains on the one hand, and from pygmoid tribes of the Central Mountains on the other, also reveal two completely different types of melody. The following example is from the Kauwerawet; melodies of this kind are characteristic of Australian culture:

Ex. 286

1 Kunst, A Study on Papuan Music, pp. 24 ff.

Page 220

OTHER ISLANDS OF THE INDIAN ARCHIPELAGO

179

The next example is from the Awembiak, one of the Central tribes;

it is fanfared and has a range of an octave and a half:

Ex. 287

Certain coastal melodies, such as those of the Waropen, seem to

betray Malayan influence, judged by their pelog character. The fol-

lowing is an example:

Ex. 288

Other coastal melodies are triadic in character but not fanfared. This

suggests that the fanfared melodies are correlated with the persistence

of the Negrito civilization in those regions most sheltered from foreign

influence: the mountain ranges of the interior of New Guinea. It is

assumed by some authorities that fanfared tunes can arise only in

regions where wind-instruments are, or have in the past been, played;

but fanfared melodies also occur in Formosa among the Vusun1

aboriginals and are there clearly linked with the use of the musical

bow. With this instrument the fanfare is derived from the upper

partials of the fundamental, selectively reinforced by the mouth

cavity. Similarly, the Jew’s harp may be the source of the Negrito

fanfares; for any instrument producing sounds in which the harmonic

series of overtones is conspicuous may serve as a source of a fan-

fared series (2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th overtones), when coupled with the

mouth cavity as a selective resonator. It may be argued that the

Negrito civilization, although comparatively primitive, stands on a

higher level, from a musical point of view, than does the younger

component, represented by the ‘Australian’ melodies. This superior-

ity in musical culture is paralleled by the general cultural superiority

1 Takatomo Kurosawa, ‘The Musical Bow of the Bununs[sic] Tribe in Formosa and

Suggestion as to the Origin of the Pentatonic Scale’, Tôyô Ongaku Kenkyû, x-xi (Tokyo,

1952), pp. 18-32.

Page 221

180

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

of the Negritos as compared with coastal peoples, in whom the portion of Australian and Melanesian blood is higher.1

Although the extreme type of fanfared melody seems to be confined to central New Guinea and certain of the islands off the coast, melodies of a pronouncedly triadic character have been recorded from the coastal regions of New Guinea, among the Semang in central Malaya, in Flores (east of Bali in the chain of islands), and in Samoa among the central Polynesian Islands.2 It is understandable that canons in unison may arise from the antiphonal singing of triadic melodies, and such have been transcribed from recordings made among the Semang.3

The most remarkable canons are those recorded in west Flores.4 One of these is a two-part canon in unison sung by two women over a drone bass of tonic and fifth sustained by two men; a third man proposes a chromatic variant on the melody (against the drone) while the women interrupt their canon.5 The following is another (partial) canon on a tonic pedal held by two voices:6

Ex. 289

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

It remains now to consider the interrelations of musical cultures over Far Eastern Asia, both in time and space. First, in contrast to

1 Kunst, A Study on Papuan Music, pp. 24 ff.

2 See Exs. 44 and 78.

3 F. M. Kolinski, 'Die Musik der Primitivstämme auf Malaka usw.', Anthropos, xxv (1930), pp. 585-648.

4 See Ex. 113.

5 See Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 51, ex. 29. The complete canon will be found in Kunst, 'Music in Flores', p. 77.

6 Kunst, Over zeldzame Fluiten, p. 78.

Page 222

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

181

the condition observable in what has been defined here as the Far Eastern area, orchestras of idiophonic instruments have never (so far as we know) been a feature of the musical life of India. This statement may require revision when more is known of the musics of primitive Indian peoples. It remains true, however, that the whole tendency of cultured Indian music is towards chamber music: a singer is accompanied by a double drone on the tambura, or by two fiddles and a pair of hand-beaten drums, or by vînâ (a stick-zither), fiddle, and drum.1 Such ensembles obviously have more affinity with the Chinese theatre orchestra than with the ritual orchestra described in the Yilii (p. 90) or with the orchestras of Siam, Cambodia, Java, and Bali. The ritual music of Bali introduces us to a very different musical world, a world with almost no point of contact with the orchestras of present-day India and almost without contact with the music of present-day China; but it resembles, to some extent, the world of ancient Chinese ritual.

If we survey rapidly the present distribution of ‘idiophonic’ orchestras, that is, of orchestras including a high proportion of chime-idiophones, we find, first, a few ritual orchestras surviving in China, rarely, if ever, played. In Korea we find stone-chimes, bell-chimes, celestas of iron plates, surviving in their ancient Chinese form and still played. In Annam a few instruments survive in the palace, un-played, but as we have seen (p. 157), in rural Annam both stone- and bamboo-chimes and orchestras are to be found. In Cambodia and Siam we meet with a functional orchestra of gong-chimes, celestas, and bamboo xylophones, with flutes and drums as the only non-idiophonic components. In Java we observe a division of the celesta-like metallophones into forms with and without resonators; flute and sometimes rebab are used as leading solo instruments—perhaps a trace of Islamic dominance. Then comes the classical Balinese orchestra of idiophonic instruments and drums only; next the wooden chime-idiophones scattered over the islands, sometimes united as orchestras, sometimes used as single instruments; and finally there are the single wooden idiophones, simple as opposed to compound, flung far out over the Pacific Islands even to the Americas: the slit-drums and drum-substitutes made from bamboo tubes.

Were there no chime-idiophones in Korea and China one might define an Indonesian musical culture centred on Java, fading out in Annam in contact with China, in Burma in contact with India, in the islands in contact with Australian and Negrito elements. But the

1 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 192.

Page 223

182

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

existence of chime-idiophones as the first-named components of the

Jou ritual orchestra, surviving to this day in Korea, necessitates a

different assessment: their existence suggests that that cultural ele-

ment in Indo-China, in Indonesia, and in the Pacific islands, which is

responsible for the existence of chime-idiophones today, was still

actively shaping Chinese musical culture at the time of the Warring

States in the third century B.C.

We might suppose that Chinese influence in our own era had

imposed this chime-idiophone culture on Indo-China and Indonesia.

But this is out of the question. Annam, for example, the region most

obviously under Chinese influence, was an integral part of the Chinese

empire from 111 B.C. until A.D. 939; it was again held by the Chinese

for a brief period in Ming times. Yet in spite of a deliberate attempt

by the Annamite dynasty to foster Confucianism in 1007, and a fierce

persecution of Buddhism in favour of Confucianism by the Chinese

in Ming times,1 there is almost no trace of the ritual orchestra in

urban Annam at the present time. Indeed, chime-idiophones only

survive in regions least exposed to Chinese influence.

A second possible channel of Chinese influence was established

later: Khubilai Khan, Mongol emperor of China, attacked Java in

  1. His offensive was repulsed; but from this time onwards

Chinese influence in Java grew until, at the end of the fifteenth cen-

tury, it is noticeable in the treatment of landscape in temple bas-

reliefs.2 The contact was established too late, however. It is not to be

supposed that Chinese influence in Yuan times led to the develop-

ment of an orchestra in some respects more primitive than the ritual

orchestra of Jou times.

In Siam and Cambodia, on the other hand, the chief formative

cultural influence is usually held to have been Indian—either Sivaist

or Buddhist; yet the music of Siam and Cambodia is characterized

by the use of orchestras of chime-idiophones with the rebab as the

sole Indian (or Islamic) borrowing. From bas-reliefs on the great

stupa at Borobudur in Java (750) it is known that orchestras of the

time included all the instruments of ancient India.3 The evidence

suggests that in Java, at any rate, Indian musical influence was at one

time paramount in court and ritual orchestras; it renders even more

striking the fact that Java now shows so little trace of this influx of

foreign instruments. If one assumes that Siam and Cambodia were

at one time no less Hinduized than was Java, it is remarkable that

1 J. Auboyer, op. cit., pp. 396 ff.

2 Ibid., p. 412.

3 Sachs, A History of Musical Instruments, p. 235.

Page 224

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

183

they also exhibit so little Indian influence in their current musical practices.

An alternative explanation would seem to be that in the remote past the inhabitants of the great plain of the Yellow River included an ethnic element closely related to that now distributed all over southern China, Farther India, Indo-China, Indonesia, and the Archipelago.

A number of cultural parallels have in fact been adduced at different times in support of the idea of an ancient community of culture over Far Eastern Asia.

One such is the parallel between ceremonies in different regions in which protective animals participate.

Attention has been drawn to the resemblance of the Balinese Barong to the lion-dancers in Hokusai's album Daily Exorcisms;1 and the Barong has been compared with the Chinese lion that dances in the street at the New Year.2 To these may be added the Tibetan lion dancers.

It must be admitted, however, that the common factor in these parallels may be Tantric Buddhism of Indian origin.

There are, however, certain other features, so far unconsidered, common to the musical cultures of the different peoples in this area.

One of these is the importance of the bamboo plant.

The Javanese myth of the origin of music is described by Raffles in the following terms: 'the first music of which they have any idea was produced by the accidental admission of the air into a bamboo tube, which was left hanging on a tree . . . the angkloeng was the first improvement upon this Aeolian music.'3 Here, as in the Chinese account of the making of the pitch-pipes (p. 94), bamboo is of primary importance.

A second point in relation to bamboo concerns the curious mixture of names of bells and of pipes in the Chinese names for the series of pitch-pipes, the lühlü (p. 95).

This mixture of names has functional parallels in Indonesia.

In the quotation from Raffles an idiophonic instrument is regarded as the descendant of a wind-instrument; conversely one finds wind-instruments (goembang) in gamelans in West Java, which functionally replace single gongs and are in fact bass flutes; other examples of such instruments are to be found on other islands—on Flores, for example.4

The functional equivalence of struck xylophones and struck metallophones can be observed all over Indo-China and Indonesia.

Moreover, in the area of the islands many of the simple struck idiophones are resonating bamboo tubes; for a tube may either be struck or

1 De Zoete and Spies, op. cit., p. 95.

2 M. Covarrubias, Island of Bali (London, 1937), p. 356.

3 Quoted by McPhee, ‘Angkloeng gamelans in Bali’, from T. S. Raffles, The History of Java, i (London, 1817), p. 472.

4 Kunst, Over zeldzame Fluiten, op. cit., p. 14.

Page 225

184 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

blown to yield a note. The observation, then, that names of bells and

names of bamboo tubes were freely mixed in naming a series of pitch-

pipes in ancient China, is surely less surprising when one finds:

(1) blown pipes functionally replacing struck metallophones; (2) bam-

boo xylophones existing side by side with metallophone chimes; and

(3) a living tradition to the effect that, although a blown pipe pro-

duced the first music, a struck tuned pipe (the angkloeng) was the first

improvement on such a system.

Considerable interest has been aroused among musicologists by the

parallels between Chinese and South American panpipes.1 In surviv-

ing specimens of Chinese panpipes, the pipes are divided into the two

sets, the liuh and the leu, arranged symmetrically on either side of the

instrument. In ancient Peru the two sets of panpipes (in ‘raft’-form,

as in China), played by two players, were connected by a cord. This

arrangement still exists in Bolivia and among the Karen in Burma.

Now the two sets of pipes in the Chinese instrument are the male and

female portions of the series (p. 95); and, as if echoing Chinese

practice, among the Cuna Indians of Panama, the player has two

sets of panpipes, a fifth apart, referred to as man and wife and con-

nected by a cord. These instruments seem to point to the possibility

that a knowledge of the properties of pipes is a part of the most

ancient cultural heritage of a people distributed in the course of time

from the Yellow River valley to the Burmese hinterland and Central

and South America.

The whole position of the bamboo plant in early Chinese civiliza-

tion is of importance in the discussion of cultural affinities. It seems

reasonable to assume that, whatever elements may have coexisted or

been added at a later stage, there must have been a considerable

bamboo-cultural element in the people who made and played and

sang about mouth-organs (in the Book of Songs) in the eighth cen-

tury B.C. Elephant and buffalo, as well as the bamboo rat, Rhizomys,

were known to the people of Anyang in Shang times, and the climate

in general was milder and more humid then than later.2 Though large

bamboos do not grow today in the region of Anyang they may well

have grown there in the second millennium B.C. The presence of such

a bamboo-cultural element would make understandable the pre-

occupation of these people with the properties of pipes as sound-

producing organs of all types, both as wind-instruments and as

1 Sachs, A History of Musical Instruments, p. 178.

2 P. Teilhard de Chardin and Pei Wen-Chung, Le Néolithique de la Chine (Pekin,

1944). See pp. 15-20.

Page 226

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

185

struck-idiophones. Furthermore it seems likely that a relationship

between struck-idiophones and free aerophones, such as one observes

in this area, could only have been discovered in a bamboo culture,

since bamboo is unique among natural products in mechanical pro-

perties and in conformation.

Various wooden idiophones have been known in China since

ancient times: the tiger (a scraped idiophone), the percussion clapper,

and the trough (a struck-idiophone) were used in the Jou orchestra;

the wooden fish, still in use among Taoists and Buddhists, is a slit-

drum. By this armoury of simple wooden idiophones, China is linked

with many peoples of south-eastern Asia; and one of these ancient

idiophones, of the dimensions of a toy, distributed at the present

time almost universally over central Asia, Siberia, China, Indo-

China, Assam, Indonesia, and Melanesia, is the Jew’s harp.

The position of the Jew’s harp among musical instruments is re-

markable. It is, following Sachs’s classification, a plucked idiophone,

that is, an instrument of naturally sonorous material requiring no

additional tension (as do strings or membranes) to convert it to a

substance of high elastic modulus. But in the form in which it occurs

among the Naga, Mosuo and Minjia, for example, it is only a step

removed from the free reed of the mouth-organ. There is evidence

that the free reed has always been recognized by the Chinese as an

instrument distinct from the mouth-organ in which it occurs. It is

referred to in the Book of Songs as hwang (192) written with the

bamboo determinative, and this is nowadays identified ‘with the

metallic free reed of the mouth-organ: Waley1 translates, for example,

‘Blow my shêng-pipes, trill their tongues’, where ‘tongue’ is ‘hwang’.

Although the free reeds are of thin copper in the Miao mouth-organs

(p. 150), as they are in the Chinese instrument, in those from other

peoples of south-eastern Asia—from the Dyaks of Borneo, for

example—the free reeds are cut in thin bamboo and let into the wall

of the pipe (pl. 6 (f) and (g)). From the photograph it can be seen

that in construction these reeds are miniature Jew’s harps, with the

thickening near the free end of the tongue carved in the substance of

the reed, as in the Jew’s harps (pl. 6 (c) and (d)). ‘Whistles’ from

Shandong may consist of two short tubes of bamboo into the walls of

1 The Book of Songs (London, 1937), p. 192. This is the usual interpretation of this

passage; but it is worth noticing that there is a suggestive change in the verb in the

Chinese. A literal translation would be: ‘Blow sheng; strike hwang.’ Van Gulik (R. H.

van Gulik, Hsi K’ang and his Poetical Essay on the Lute (Tokyo, 1941)) has indeed

suggested that the hwang was a separate instrument—in his opinion a variety of sheng.

It may have been a plucked or struck idiophone.

Page 227

186 MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

which two bamboo free reeds are inserted, as in the Dyak instrument (pl. 3 (j)).

From accounts of the Jew's harp-technique in eastern Asia,1,2 it is clear that although this is a plucked idiophone, and the mouth-cavity acts as a loosely coupled variable resonator, the amplitude of vibration of the tongue is influenced by the manner in which the breath is expelled against it. The Jew's harp is not so far removed from the free reed, activated by the breath and closely coupled with a tuned resonator, as one might suppose. The frequent use of a large, loosely coupled resonator with the Jew's harp in Java,3 for example, narrows still further the gap between free reed and Jew's harp. Only in bamboo, however, is a continuous transition possible, in the same material, from struck or plucked macro-idiophone to a plucked micro-idiophone (a Jew's harp) and from this to a breath-activated micro-idiophone (a free reed). This is because of the special properties of bamboo; its stiffness is greater than that of any other wood and it occurs naturally in the form of resonators.

One remarkable aspect of the Jew's harp technique in various regions of the Far East is its use to imitate animal or human sounds;3 similar use is made of its relative, the free reed. We have seen how the Jew's harp is used by the Lihjiang Mosuo in China to imitate speech during courtship (p. 154). The koouchyyntzyy (193) (a free reed 'whistle') is used in Pekin puppet plays today for imitating animal and human sounds—hens and infants, for example; and there is a Sonq account of a man rendered mute who successfully used a 'whistle' for purposes of communication, 'as do the puppet players'.4 In Bali there is a Jew's harp orchestra which not only plays music of the ritual orchestra, but also provides an accompaniment of animal noises for certain dances: in particular, noises of toads for a pantomime toad chase.5 Lastly, tribes of the Nassau Range in central New Guinea 'sym-bolise consciously certain animals by means of the Jew's harp. . .'.6

Even the onomatopoeic names for the Jew's harp, current in widely separated regions of eastern Asia, appear to be related. The Balinese gènggong recalls the gonggina of the Garos in Assam,7

1 McPhee, 'Angklöeng gamelans in Bali', op. cit., p. 127.

2 Emsheimer, 'Über das Vorkommen und die Anwendungsart der maultronmmel in Sibirien und Zentral-Asien', Ethnos, vi (Stockholm, 1941), pp. 109–27.

3 Kunst, Music in Java (The Hague, 1949), pp. 360 and 443.

4 Souen K'ai-ti, 'L'origine et le développement du théâtre des marionnettes chinoises', Bulletin du centre franco-chinois d'études sinologiques, i (Pekin, 1944), pp. 81–106 (summary in French) (1944).

5 De Zoete and Spies, op. cit., pp. 249 ff.

6 Kunst, A Study on Papuan Music, p. 8.

7 A. Playfair, The Garos (London, 1909), p. 44.

Page 228

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

187

the kunka of the Golds (lower Amur, eastern Siberia)1 and the qongon

of the Gilyaks (lower Amur1 and Sakhalin). The Chinese hwang,

for the free reed–derived (according to Karlgren2) from an ancient

form g’wang, may also be related to these.

The coming of the Bronze Age to the Far East meant the transla-

tion of stone or bamboo idiophones, both simple and compound,

into bronze. The free reeds, we may suppose, were translated at this

time to metallic free reeds; and the Jew’s harp has also undergone

translation into terms of metal. Bronze Age culture undoubtedly

reached the various regions of the Far East at very different times:

although it was advanced, for example, in the plain of the Yellow

River by 1500 B.C., it does not seem to have reached northern Annam

until the fourth century before our era (p. 91). In rural areas on the

mainland and in some of the islands of south-eastern Asia, the transla-

tion of bamboo idiophones into metallophones has never occurred.

We have seen (p. 67) that the five notes of the Chinese scale were

anciently correlated with various aspects of the cosmos. A similar

correlation exists in Bali, where the five notes are associated with the

gods of the five directions: North, East, South, West, and Centre.3

The Centre is the realm of Batara Siva (whose colour is white) and is

equated with the first note of the series, ding. Each of the four direc-

tions has its colour and is equated with one of the notes. It may be

that this system is Indian in origin, but it has not been possible to find

an Indian correlation of a five-note scale with the properties of the

cosmos. Moreover, even before the third century B.C.,4 the Chinese

were certainly familiar with the Five Rulers of the Earthly Regions,

each with his characteristic colour. At the time of the compilation of

the Liijih Yuehling the following equation had been established

between the notes and the directions.5

Note Direction

mi east

sol south

do centre

re west

la north

1 Emsheimer, ‘Uber das Vorkommen und die Anwendungsart der Maultrommel in

Sibirien und Zentral-Asien’.

2 B. Karlgren, Compendium of Phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese (Stockholm,

1954), p. 319.

3 McPhee, A House in Bali, p. 40.

4 G. Haloun, ‘Die Rekonstruktion der chinesischen Urgeschichte durch die Chinesen’,

Japanisch-Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Technik, iii (Kobe, 1925), pp.

243–70.

5 Courant, ‘Essai historique sur la musique classique des Chinois’, Encyclopédie de la

musique, 1re partie, i, p. 93.

Page 229

188

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA: 2. OTHER COUNTRIES

From McPhee's brief statement it is not possible to be certain what are the Balinese correlations of notes, colours, and directions, except in the case of the tonic, ding, which is the Centre and is white. In the Chinese system the Centre is yellow; but correlations varied. Symaa Chian,1 for example, quotes a system with re and la reversed. The existence of such a correlation in Indonesia, even though the terms correlated differ, merits investigation.

Looking back now over the whole of the Far Eastern area, we may surely regard it, with some justification, as a unit. From what centre an ancient common musical culture spread throughout the area under review cannot as yet be determined; nor are we in a position to do more than note the possible significance of cultural parallels recently established between the Balkans and south-eastern Asia, parallels which suggest a far closer connexion between the Far East and the lands of the Pontine Basin in the first millennium B.C. than has hitherto been envisaged;2 but that the 'chime-idiophone' substratum is of great antiquity is clear from the recent discovery in southern Annam of stone-chimes knapped in the manner of neolithic flints from the Bacsonian of Indo-China and tuned to a pentatonic scale close to the pelog scales of Indonesia.3

In spite of the foreign instruments and music which began to invade China from Han times onwards, and in spite of the one time dominance of Indian instruments and music in Indo-China and Indonesia, we are never likely to confuse Chinese, Siamese, Cambodian, or Indonesian music with Indian music, so strongly marked is the individuality of the music of Far Eastern Asia. In some of the islands of the Archipelago, however, we meet a different musical culture; there, melodies take the form of expanded triads or fanfares. Pure fanfared melodies also occur, as we have seen, in rural Annam and in Cambodia. Their occurrence on the mainland accords well with the general picture of population dynamics in south-eastern Asia; anthropological studies also suggest the presence in parts of Indo-China of

1 See M. Granet, La Pensée chinoise (Paris, 1934), p. 377.

2 Kunst, 'Kulturhistorische Beziehungen zwischen dem Balkan und Indonesien', Mededeling No. CIII, Afdeling Culturele en Physische Anthropologie, No. 46, Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen (Amsterdam, 1953).

3 Schaeffner, 'Une importante découverte archéologique: Le lithophone de Ndut Lieng Krak (Vietnam)', La Revue de Musicologie, xxxiiie année, n.s.: Nos. 97–98 (Paris, 1951), pp. 1–19; G. Condominas, 'Le lithophone préhistorique de Ndut Lieng Krak', Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, xlv (Paris, 1951), pp. 359–92. See, however, F. A. Kuttner's criticism in 'Nochmals die Steinzeit-Lithophone von Annam', Die Musikforschung, vi (1953), pp. 1–8.

Page 230

CULTURAL INTERRELATIONS

negritoid peoples.1 The possible relationship of certain peoples of south-eastern Asia to African peoples must not be lost sight of; and here again studies of music and musical instruments already offer significant pointers.2 Finally, there is reason to anticipate that traces of other, and possibly earlier, musical strata than the common substratum will be found throughout the Far Eastern area ; it is for the future to confirm their existence and determine their ethnological significance.

1 W. Nippold, Rassen- und Kulturgeschichte der Negrito-Völker Südost-Asiens (Göttingen, 1936), pp. 109-35.

2 Kunst, ‘A Musicological Argument for Cultural Relationship between Indonesia—probably the Isle of Java—and Central Africa’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, lxii (1936), pp. 57-76.

Page 231

190

GLOSSARY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS

53 | 46 | 38 | 29 | 21 | 春 | 8 | 1

爛 | 剡 | 鐘 | 琴 | 碧 | 耒 | 雲 | 新

煌 54 | 敬 47 | 39 | 瑟 30 | 墳 22 | 耒 | 南 9 | 疆 2

笙 | 擇 48 | 鎮 | 瑶 31 | 墓 23 | 耜 16 | 耜 | 川 | 西安 3

55 | 京 房 | 40 | 箏 32 | 詩 經 24 | 司 訽 | 猛 11 | 唐 4

月 | 淮 48 | 轟 41 | 笙 | 貴 州 | 馯 迥 | 楊 | 子 | 秦 5

琴 | 淮 | 轟 | 笛 33 | 篇 | 史 記 | 江 13 | 漢 6

56 | 應 鼓 49 | 均 42 | 笙 | 荒 34 | 周 | | 周 禮 12 | 羅 7

三 | 武 50 | 政 43 | 簧 35 | 春 懐 | 明 18 | 楊 | 禮 | 麽 些

絃 | 山 東 51 | 泰 始 皇 44 | 管 36 | 柘 | 商 | | 呂 氏 14 |

57 | | | 籥 37 | 扜 | | | |

胡 | 52 | 毋 | 儀 禮 | 歌 | 安 陽 | | |

琴 | 魏 | | | | | | |

58 | | | | | | | |

二 | | | | | | | |

胡 | | | | | | | |

59 | | | | | | | |

洋 | | | | | | | |

琴 | | | | | | | |

(46): For shin read shi of Kangshi (89).

Page 232

GLOSSARY

191

103 遍

95 方相

89 廉纖

84 合尺工凡六五

82 二三四五六七

74 沛

60 伶倫

104 陰法會

96 雞

90 由拳

67 淮南子

75 調

61 古樂

唐宋大曲之來源及其組織

97 魏傀儡

91 曹劌

85 樂律全書

83 白石道人歌曲四卷

四部叢刊

76 均

68 武帝

62 宮商角徵羽

77 太宗

69 樂府

63 音律

78 宋

70 盡

64 呂

79 美婁

71 滆

65 律

80 宋姜

72 埻

73 鄭譯

81 金

98 傀儡

92 變徵

86 朱載堉

84 元

99 籥

93 變宮

87 鄭

100 箭

94 標

88 清

101 西安

95 標

102 大曲

武昌華中

Page 233

192

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA

139

140

141

142

143

西

135

136

137

138

129

130

131

132

133

134

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

112

113

109

110

111

105

106

107

108

Page 234

GLOSSARY

193

181

調

182

183

184

175

176

調

177

調

178

179

180

173

174

168

169

170

171

172

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

156

調

157

158

159

160

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

144

145

146

滿

147

148

B 3608

Page 235

194

MUSIC OF FAR EASTERN ASIA

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

西

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

第一

Page 236

IV

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

By Arnold Bake

INTRODUCTION

The term 'Indian music' embraces a very wide and varied field of musical phenomena. Classical theory was formulated in detail as early as the second century B.C., the date now accepted for Bharata's Nāṭyaśāstra, the earliest surviving treatise. This is actually a work on stagecraft, but includes six chapters on music. On the subject of religious chanting there are even older texts, like the Rkprātiśākhya (fourth century B.C. ?), and the oral tradition of that kind of music goes back at least a thousand years more.

Apart from this historically developed and theoretically defined system, one has to take into consideration the numerous ways in which the different peoples and tribes of India give vent to their musical impulses, which vary according to their respective stages of culture. This wide range of musical activities has not escaped the notice of the indigeneous authors on music; they mention its existence but do not take it into account when formulating the classical theoretical system.

When we examine the system which the Indian writers themselves have built up, we see that we are confronted with something closely related to that of Ancient Greece. The conclusion reached by Antoine Meillet in respect of the metres of Ancient Greece and India: 'Le nombre et la précision des concordances du védique avec le grec sont trop nets pour qu'une rencontre fortuite soit vraisemblable',1 is equally applicable when comparing the systems of music of the two ancient civilizations.

The music of India is the easternmost representative of a large group of interrelated musical phenomena, in the same way as Sanskrit is the easternmost representative of a large group of Indo-European languages. On the northern and eastern border of India this group meets, but does not intermingle with, the basically different conceptions of the Chino-Tibetan and the Far Eastern tone-systems. It is

1 Antoine Meillet, Les Origines indo-européennes des mètres grecs (Paris, 1923), p. 76.

Page 237

196

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

true that one finds strains of a composite nature in the folk-music of

Nepal, northern and eastern Bengal, Assam, and down into the

Chittagong Hills, but the official system does not acknowledge them,

nor are they found anywhere outside these very definite border-

regions.

CULTURAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL IMPORTANCE

It is impossible to divorce Indian music from the whole struc-

ture of Indian culture and philosophy with which it is interwoven

in a number of ways from the earliest times of which we have

records.

A remarkable feature of Indian culture is its ability to integrate

many different and seemingly divergent tendencies against the back-

ground of a unifying philosophical thought. From an Indian stand-

point there is nothing strange in the fact that the Saṃgītaratnâkara

(The Ocean of Music), a treatise dating from the thirteenth century,

should begin with a detailed cosmogony, gradually narrowing its

scope to the human body and the stages of pregnancy from month

to month, before it gets down to what we should consider the subject

of music proper. To the Indian student, music is not an isolated

phenomenon but one directly and inextricably linked with philosophy

and religion, and of cosmic importance. The right kind of music-

that is to say, the only kind of music worth considering—is that which

deserves the epithet vimuktida (bestowing liberation), that is the music

which, when properly practised, serves to break the cycle of birth,

death, and rebirth. The eminent French Sanskritist Sylvain Lévi once

said: ‘On ne sait pas assez le rôle immense qu’a tenu la musique dans

les civilisations anciennes comme un élément intégrant de la vie

religieuse et politique.’1 To look into that aspect of the matter well

repays the trouble.

In the finished system, as found in the texts of the classical, pre-

Islamic period, such as the Saṃgītaratnâkara, we find the central

notion of nâda (sound) which has, of course, a musical connota-

tion, but, apart from this musical meaning, a physical as well as

a metaphysical aspect.

In music—the Sanskrit term for which, Saṃgīta, includes vocal

music, instrumental music, and dance—vocal music is considered to

be pure sound, sound per se, in contrast to instrumental music

which is described as a manifestation of sound. Dance, the third

1

In a letter to the Director of the Kern Institute of Leyden University (25 November

1929).

Page 238

CULTURAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL IMPORTANCE

197

component of the triad, is dependent on both vocal and instrumental

music, so that music as a whole is dependent on sound.1

This definite distinction between the nature of vocal music and that

of instrumental music seems strange from a rationalistic standpoint.

Why should the one be pure sound in itself and the other a secondary

manifestation? It seems that at the time when these theories were

first formulated the function of the vocal chords was unknown. Thus

it is easily understandable that the miracle of the change from silent

life-breath (prâna) into sounds of meaning and beauty, without the

aid of any visible or perceptible agent, came to be considered as a

spontaneous manifestation of sound itself, basically different from

the sound produced by a man-made instrument.

That the function of the vocal chords was unknown, or at least

considered to be irrelevant, we may conclude from the description of

the five stages of this spontaneous manifestation:2 “This prâna then,

stirred by the fire of the body, goes gradually upwards and produces

an extremely subtle sound in the navel, a subtle sound in the heart,

a strong sound in the throat, a weak sound in the head, and in the

mouth a sound with the qualities of art.’

On the physical plane the entire human society is dependent on

sound, as explained by the following reasoning:3 ‘By sound the letter

is formed, by letters the syllable, by syllables the word, by words this

daily life. Hence this human world is dependent on sound.’

It must be borne in mind that the sound that rules the world by

means of speech is the same spontaneous manifestation which pro-

duces the musical phenomena.

The metaphysical theory of sound, set forth in the Samgîtaratnâ-

kara, shows the position of music in the religious system of India. It

probably represents a medieval attempt at explaining the actual reli-

gious importance of music which struck the philosophers of those

days, but had its roots in much earlier, even prehistoric periods.

1 Śârngadeva, Samgîtaratnâkara (referred to later as SR) Ânandâśrama Sanskrit

Series, 2 vols. (Poona, 1896), i. 2. 1; Dâmodara, Samgîtadarpana (referred to later as SD)

(Paris, 1930), i. 13:

gîtam nâdâtmakam vâdyam nâdavyaktyâ praśasyate

taddvayânugatam nrtyam nâdâdhinam atas trayam

2 SR, i. 3. 3-5a. SD, i. 34, 35:

pâvakapreritah so'tha kramâd ûrdhvapathe caran

atisúkṣmam dhvanim nâbhau hrdi súkṣmam gale punah

puṣtam śîrṣe tu paṭhyam ca kṛtrimam vadane tathâ

avirbhâvayatîty evam pañcadhâ kîrtyate budhaih.

(34)

(35)

3 SR, i. 2. 2; SD, i. 14:

nâdena vajyate varnah padam varnât padâd vacah

vacasov yavahâro 'yam nâdâdhinam ato jagat.

Page 239

198

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

The metaphysical explanations are principally concerned with vocal sound, as being primary in nature. This, as we have seen above, was produced by the gradual upward surge of the prâna or life-breath. In its course the prâna passes different mystical centres of power, bearing the name of cakras (circles), portrayed as lotuses with a varying number of petals. Two of those cakras have special importance from the musical point of view, namely the anâhatacakra situated in the heart, and the viśuddha cakra in the throat. The latter, having sixteen petals, is considered as the seat of speech and of all the musical notes with their divisions and variations.1

The sound alluded to so far is only the âhatanâda (struck or manifested sound), which cannot exist without its ideal counterpart, the anâhatanâda (unstruck or unmanifested sound). It is this dual nature of sound as âhata and anâhata, which brings it right into the centre of religious-philosophical speculations, because the unmanifested sound, the anâhatanâda, is identified with the creative principle of the universe in its transcendental form of Shiva himself, as well as in its immanent form as the syllable OM which is said to reside in the heart. Hence the name of the centre of power placed there, the anâhatacakra:2

In the heart is a lotus with twelve petals, called anâhata, belonging to Shiva in his aspect of the syllable om, a beloved object of adoration.

There the wise revere the unmanifested sound according to the instructions of the preceptors, the sound that is for liberation but not for enjoyment. That sound, however, when manifested in the world, serves for enjoyment, but also to break the cycle of existence.

In this context the breaking of the cycle of existence means the merging of the individual self with the creative principle of the Universe.

It is now easy to see how music was held to serve as a means to that ultimate bliss. Sound, in its unmanifested aspect, was identical with the divine creative principle of the Universe, not only in its transcendental aspect, but also with that aspect which dwells in one's heart. So it remained for the individual to find the right way to realize the connexion between the latter aspect of the unmanifested sound and the manifested sound, in order to be brought into direct contact with the divine creative principle of the universe itself, which amounted to the desired liberation. The obvious means to this end was music,

1 SR, i. 2. 199 ff. SD, i. 18–25a.

2 SR, i. 2. 164b–165. SD, i. 16–17a:

tatrânahatam nâdam tu munayah sampupâsate gurupadiṣṭa-mârgena muktidam na tu rañjakam

sa nâdas tvâhato lokeranjako bhavabhañjakah.

(16)

Page 240

CULTURAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL IMPORTANCE

199

and preferably vocal music, which by its own nature was pure sound

itself.

On the physical plane the power of music was easily grasped when

one understood that, on the one hand, sound regulated human society

through its power to form letters, syllables, and words, and that, on

the other hand, vocal music was that very sound in its spontaneous

form. The ideal means to influence and regulate the course of human

existence would thus naturally be a combination of words and musical

sound, that is to say the intoned formula, or mantra, which we actu-

ally find used for that end in every form of religion on Indian soil.

In the above philosophical construction of āhata and anāhatanāda,

we find consequently the crystallization of the ancient Indian belief

that music has a well-defined power to influence the course of human

life in this world, and that it even can lead to the ultimate bliss of

the merging of the self with the divine principle of the universe, in

other words that it can bring about the breaking of the cycle of

existence. Hence it fully deserves the epithet vimuktida (bestowing

liberation), given to it in the Sanskrit texts.

VEDIC MUSIC

The notion that the power of music, especially the intoned word,

can influence the course of human destiny and even the order of the

Universe, goes back to the very oldest surviving form of Indian music,

namely, the music of the Vedas. The intoned formula is the pivot of

the whole elaborate structure of Vedic offerings and sacrifices. It is

the power of the words, enunciated with the correct intonation, that

determines the efficacy of the rites: a mistake may destroy every-

thing. The priests claim that by their activity they not only uphold

the order of human society, but maintain the stability of the universe.

By means of well-conducted ceremonies they have compelling power

over the Gods themselves. The instrument that conveys that power

is the word. It is impossible to overlook the connexion between

Brahman, in the sense of divine principle, and brahman in the sense

of sacrificial formula or incantation.

The Vedic offerings comprise a great many actions: altars are built,

fires are lit, butter and other substances are poured into the flames,

and animals are sacrificed. Sometimes these activities may continue

for a year or longer, but none of them have any value unless accom-

panied by the prescribed recitations, uttered with exactly the right

intonation. Musically those recitations are of great interest, as in their

successive forms they represent the development from ordinary speech

Page 241

200

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

to elaborate singing, with a compass ranging from one or two notes to an octave. The bhāṣikasvara (speech tone) has the narrowest compass and is employed, according to tradition, in reciting the formulas of the (White) Yajur Veda. It is an even recitation without variation in pitch. A greater compass, however, is found in the Rigveda, the basis of all the texts used at the Vedic offerings. It contains the hymns to the different deities as they were composed by the sages of old who are known by name, but about whose date nothing is known with certainty. Opinions range over a couple of thousand years, one school placing them in the fourth millennium B.C., another about the middle of the second millennium.

The way of chanting the Rigvedic hymns has definite musical importance, as the three accents employed, the udātta, the anudātta, and the svarita, denote a distinct difference in pitch. There is some controversy as to the original meaning of these accents and their relationship to the pracaya (multitude)—a term denoting a succession of unaccented syllables. As we find the practice of Rigvedic recitation in our days—and examples collected by Haug in 18741 and Felber in 19122 seem to indicate that at that time the same system was followed—the accents indicate a compass of a minor or major third, the middle note being the udātta, the lower the anudātta, and the upper the svarita. The pracaya coincides with the udātta, which, as a matter of fact, is itself unmarked in the Vedic texts. The anudātta is indicated by a horizontal line under the syllable, the svarita by a perpendicular line over it:

Ex. 290

(Taittirīya-āraṇyaka X. 11, as sung by Manjeri Ramakrishna Iyar, Allepey, Travancore.)

The melodic line follows the text in every detail; the words prescribe the rhythm and the flow; there is one note to each syllable, pitch is independent of duration. One might say that the melody only supports the words.

The Rigveda is extensively used, not only during the great Vedic

1 Martin Haug, Über das Wesen und den Werth des vedischen Accents (Munich, 1874); see also Fox Strangways, Music of Hindostan (Oxford, 1914), p. 247.

2 E. Felber-Geiger, Die indische Musik der vedischen und klassischen Zeit (Vienna, 1912).

Page 242

sacrifices, but also during the lesser ceremonies in everyday life in the

house. A large measure of similarity in tradition over a very wide area

would thus point to a great antiquity and bear witness to a tenacity

of custom not surprising in a field where deviations from the pre-

scribed method were believed to have dire spiritual and material

consequences. Adherence to the hereditary style would last as long

as faith in the efficacy of the rites in question persisted. That faith has

not yet died in India in spite of the onrush of modern civilization.

In the Sâmaveda, which, in contrast to the Rigveda, is used ex-

clusively in connexion with the larger offerings and sacrifices, we find

a complete reversal of the rules laid down for the recitation of the

Rigveda. To begin with, the compass used is much wider, and some

schools of Sâmavedic chanting are said to use the full octave (the

texts give the names of the seven notes, originally counted from the

highest note downwards) but even if, as among the Nambudiris of

the Malabar coast who follow the Jaiminîya tradition, the compass

of only a second is used, the tendency is to deviate as far as possible

from ordinary speech or even chanting. The words are broken up in

an arbitrary fashion and often the periods start in the middle of a

word; vowels are lengthened beyond recognition, and syllables with-

out rational importance are inserted in the text. In most cases the

basis of the Sâmavedic chants is a hymn from the Rigveda, but it is

overlaid and changed to such an extent that the original is usually

well hidden. The object of this procedure is purely liturgical. By the

very minutely proscribed changes the spiritual efficacy of the formula

is heightened and the success of the sacrifice ensured.

The limitation of the use of the Sâmaveda to the actual offerings

and sacrifices is the cause of its much greater rarity, and it would be

useless to look for a sound tradition of the chanting of this Veda in

parts of India where, owing to social changes, these larger ceremonies

seldom take place: for instance, in northern India where continuous

foreign invasions have shaken the very basis of Hindu society. It is

in south India that the tradition according to the different schools is

carried on, handed down from teacher to pupil, as has been the case

for centuries. Priestly families in which the tradition is known to

have persisted unbroken for twenty generations are not uncom-

mon.

Research in this field, except by members of the priestly class itself,

is greatly hampered by the secrecy that surrounds this type of singing,

which is not meant to be heard, much less written down or recorded,

by uninitiated persons. This is hardly surprising when one realizes the

Page 243

202

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

supernatural effect attributed to the correct reproduction of the

melodies.

At the actual sacrifices a hymn is executed by three priests who sing

its seven divisions alone or in chorus. The priests to whom the singing

of the Sâmaveda is allotted are the Udgâtar with his two acolytes, the

Prastotar and the Pratihartar. The introductory part, the Huṃkâra

(the singing of the syllable huṃ), is done by the three together. Then

follow: 2, the Prastâva, or prelude, sung by the Prastotar; 3, the

Udgîtha, or main theme, by the Udgâtar; 4, the Pratihâra, the first

responsorium, by the Pratihartar; 5, the Upadrava, second respon-

sorium, again by the Udgâtar; 6, the Nidhana, or final chorus, by the

three priests in unison; and finally, 7, the Praṇava, the chanting

of the syllable oṃ, also in chorus, which seals the hymn like our

Amen.

For purposes of study or practice, however, the hymns are sung

by one person only according to the song-books, the Gânas, of which

there are four. The different schools of Sâmavedic chanting all use

these four books, but sing them to quite different melodies. Even in

one and the same school the differences are sometimes considerable:

Ex. 291

Kauthuma Sâmaveda (Chidambaram and Trchinopoli) S.V. I66a

Ex. 292

Kauthuma Sâmaveda (Baroda)

Page 244

It should be mentioned that the tradition of the Kauthumas, as observed in Trichinopoly and Chidambaram, both centres of south Indian orthodoxy, shows no differences at all, apart from those that might have resulted from individual uncertainties of one singer or the other. The totally different style of the example from Baroda which called itself Kauthuma too, may be due to the very influence indicated above-the foreign invasions and their cultural consequences-and bears traces of the flourishes of the later, purely secular, musical style, strongly influenced by Moslem practices.

One can see that the claim made by the classical Indian theory of music, that the proper use of this art leads to salvation, has its roots in the Vedic practices. It is true that the object of the Vedic ceremonies, built on the proper enunciation of the intoned word, is not salvation, in the later spiritual sense, but the upholding of the order of the world and, by extension, of the universe. But in both cases the sole aim is to get in touch with the powers of the world of the gods, an aim that has perpetuated itself through the centuries, varying only as to the nature of the gods and the nature of the desired contact.

The second component of the triad comprised in the word Saṃgīta, namely, instrumental music, has perhaps not such direct and clear connexions with the Vedic ceremonies as vocal music. Instruments are mentioned in the brâhmanas, the treatises that describe the procedure of the ritual, and drums and cymbals must have made their appearance at a very early date. However, seeing the paramount importance of the spoken or intoned word, it is but natural that instrumental music should occupy the second place. In any case it is more than probable that the development and perfection of instrumental Indian music is of much later date than that of the vocal art.

As to the third component of Saṃgīta, dance, which shares the epithet vimuktida with vocal and instrumental music, its links with Vedic ceremonies are very direct and clear. We find that the chanting was accompanied by movements of the hands, and perhaps also by

Page 245

204

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

prescribed steps when executing certain tasks that involved going from

one place to another. The hand movements were partly mnemo-techni-

cal, the position of the thumb against the different phalanges of the

fingers indicating certain notes or figurations—rather like the Guido-

nian hand in Gregorian music—and partly had a textual meaning,

inasmuch as certain postures indicated certain ideas or symbolized

certain deities, thus approaching a sign-language that accompanied,

followed, and intensified the meaning of the chanted text. These

sequences of hand-postures and their development into a kind of

sign-language are the basis of the most classical form of all Indian

dancing, the Bharatanâtya of southern India, and, to a lesser extent,

of the Hindu forms of north Indian dancing, as well as of the mimed

dramas of the coast of Malabar, the Kathâkali and the Yakṣagâna.

As these movements are an integral part of the Vedic ceremonies

and share the holiness of everything that belongs to revealed religion,

one sees how they are by rights the third component of Samgîta,

in so far as they have their roots in the practices of the Vedic

ritual.

In actual life it is not improbable that at times the third component

of the triad had a more prominent position than the other two. As

mentioned above, the oldest data about the theory of music are found

in the Bharatanâtyaśâstra (c. 200 B.C.). This has thirty-six chapters,

of which only chapters 28–33 deal with music.

It seems doubtful whether, outside the ritual sphere, the spiritual

importance of music was always fully realized. After all, the âhatanâda

was said to be for enjoyment as well as for the breaking of the cycle

of existence, and one cannot wonder that the accent was often laid

on the first function rather than on the second. Still, many traces of

the original sanctity are preserved, for instance in movements of

adoration and obeisance which one sees musicians and actors per-

form even nowadays and, more especially, in the attitude of the pupil

towards his music-master, which is to a great extent that of a novice

towards his spiritual guide. It is not forgotten that—if the latter

understands his task properly—he ought to lead his pupil on the way

to salvation.

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

Quite apart from its religious importance, the classical system of

Indian music deserves attention in its own right. It explains every

aspect of construction and technique in great detail, from the notes

of the scale and their subdivisions onwards.

Page 246

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

205

The Octaves

The basis of the classical system—as represented in the Samgītarat-nākara, for instance—is the octave and its division into tones and semitones, closely akin to our system. The number of octaves recognized is three, one in each register, the low being the breast register, the middle octave the throat register, and the high octave the head register. This classification is another proof of the primarily vocal conception of music in India.1

Consonance

The division of the notes of the octave is accomplished according to the laws of consonance, three intervals being recognized as such, namely, the octave, the fifth, and the fourth. Only they are consonant (samvādī). Dissonant (vivādī) are only the semitones. All the others are assonant (anuvādī).

Śrutis

For the definition of what constitutes consonance or otherwise, the Indian theory has recourse to a tonal subdivision smaller than the West has taken into consideration for the construction of its scales. This microtonic unit is called śruti, a word derived from the root śru (to hear) and it is defined as follows:2 ‘The sound that is just perceptible as such by the ear, without reverberation (i.e. harmonic connexion) is called śruti.’

There are twenty-two śrutis in the octave and the question has been asked whether they are mathematically alike. Sir William Jones, the first European scholar to interest himself in the matter, in the late eighteenth century, maintains that they are not, but are intended to be alike in a general way. He points out that mathematics do not enter into the subject at all as far as the writers of the Indian treatises are concerned.3 Bosanquet recognizes a general alikeness in the conclusion of his article ‘On the Hindu division of the Octave’,4 a conclusion with which Rao Sahib P. R. Bandharkar

1 SR, i. 3.7:

vyavahāre tvasau tredhā hṛdi mandro ‘bhidhīyate

kanṭhe madhyo mūrdhni tāro dviguṇaścottarottaraḥ.

2 SD, i. 49:

svarūpamātraśravanān nādo’nurananānam vinā

śrutir ity ucyate bhedās tasmād dvāviṃśatir matāḥ.

3 ‘On the musical modes of the Hindus’, in Asiatic Researches, iii (1792), p. 55. Reprinted in S. M. Tagore’s Hindu Music (Calcutta, 1882), pp. 123 ff.

4 Proceedings of the Royal Society, xxvi (1877).

Page 247

206

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

agrees.1 Fox Strangways, however, attributes three definite mathematical values to the śruti:2 (a) the difference between a major and

a minor tone, 22 cents, called pramâṇaśruti; (b) the difference between

a minor tone and a semitone, 70 cents; and (c) the difference between

a semitone and the pramâṇaśruti, 90 cents. Reasoning along altogether

different lines, a German scholar, Dr. B. Breloer3 arrives at the values,

24, 66, and 90 cents, practically identical with Fox Strangways's conclusion. A more recent publication, however, A. Daniélou's book on

Hindu scales,4 attacks these calculations for not being precise enough.

The exact value of the śruti, therefore, is still debated. It would seem,

however, that, so far as the Indian opinion of ancient times is concerned, śruti is a generic name for any interval smaller than a semi-

tone. No mathematical approach to the matter is found in India

before the eighteenth century.5

Śrutis are important in practice in defining the character of parallel

modes with similar intervals; a śruti smaller or larger in the one mode

than in the other creates a different mood or atmosphere. They are

also of practical importance in ornamentation when the voice, or the

vibrating string pulled sideways, swings above and below the actual

pitch of the intended note without deviating as much as a semitone.

But it is quite wrong to suppose that these śrutis are ever used in

succession, like our semitones in a chromatic scale.

Svaras

In theory the śrutis are important to define the notes (svaras) of the

octave and to establish their consonance or otherwise. A note—or,

rather tonal interval—is defined as ‘an uninterrupted series of śrutis,

belonging together in harmonic connection’.6

ṣadja or sa, consisting of four śrutis,

ṛsabha or ri, consisting of three śrutis,

gândhâra or ga, consisting of two śrutis,

madhayma or ma, consisting of four śrutis,

pañcama or pa, consisting of four śrutis,

dhaivata or dha, consisting of three śrutis,

and niṣâda or ni, consisting of two śrutis.

1 Indian Antiquary, 1912. 2 Op. cit., p. 112.

3 Grundelemente der altindischen Musik (Bonn, 1922).

4 Introduction to the Study of Musical Scales (London, 1943).

5 In the Samgîta-pârijâta (Paradise Tree of Music) of Ahobala.

6 SR, i. 3. 26:

śrutyantaraṇārabhāvi yaḥ snigdho’nuraṇaṇātmakaḥ

svato rañjayati śroṭṛcittam sa svara ucyate.

Page 248

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

207

Bharata says that notes at a distance of nine or thirteen śrutis from one another (viz. fourths and fifths) are consonant. Those at a distance of twenty śrutis (viz. seconds or sevenths) are dissonant. The remaining intervals are assonant. The later texts give two śrutis distance as the definition of vivādī notes.

Grâmas

The scale according to the ratio 4, 3, 2, 4, 4, 3, 2, given above, is only one of the two basic scales, or grâmas, in practical use. It is called the sa-grâma, because it starts from the sa of the middle register.1 Parallel to this we find the ma-grâma, which is identical, except for the difference of one śruti in the pa, which in the ma-grâma consists of three śrutis, causing the dha to have four. It is expressly stated that the ma-grâma starts on the ma of the middle register.2 The ratio of the ma-grâma thus is: 4, 3, 4, 2, 4, 3, 2.

The fourth śruti of pa which in the ma-grâma becomes the first śruti of dha is called pramâna (standard) śruti, probably because it was the only śruti readily demonstrable in practice. As both the sa- and the ma-grâma were living conceptions in Bharata’s times, it was possible to set the middle of the sa-grâma, 4, 4, 3, 2, (ma, pa, dha, ni), against the beginning of the ma-grâma, 4, 3, 4, 2, (ma, pa, dha, ni) on two identical vînâs, the pa being played on the second open string in both cases. The difference in pitch between the two pas gave a demonstration ad auras of a śruti (śru = to hear) which then could serve as a measure—pramâna—for the determination of the other, purely theoretical tonal divisions.

Following the indications of the ancient texts, which—probably as a remnant of the original descending order of the scale in Vedic times—accept the axiom that a note is realized on the last of its component śrutis, the four śrutis of sa lie between sa and ni and not, as we would reckon, between sa and ri.

Consequently the sa-grâma roughly corresponds to a D mode, the ma-grâma to a G mode, the former beginning with a minor third, the latter with a major third. Bharata explains in book 28, in the prose following verse 32, that one can play the ma-grâma starting from sa by changing the initial minor third of the sa-grâma into a major third by giving the ga four śrutis instead of two.

A third basic scale, the ga-grâma, starting on the ga of the middle register, has no practical value and is not mentioned by Bharata, but

1 SD, i. 79: tatra madhyasthashadjena shadjagrâmasya mûrchanâḥ. SR, i. 4. 12b.

2 SR, i. 4. 13b. SD, i. 79. Madhyamadhyamam ârabhya madhyamagrâmamûrchanâḥ.

Page 249

208

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

only by writers some centuries younger than he. It is said, even by the

first writer who mentions it (Nârada), to exist only in heaven. This

may refer to an arrangement of śrutis that once existed, but had fallen

into disuse at the time when the theoretical treatises were written, or

to the fact that it is a purely theoretical construction. Its ratio is 3, 3,

3, 4, 3, 2, 4, and consequently it seems to have no connexion either

with the sa- or with the ma-grâma, except for the fact that the pa

consists of three and the dha of four śrutis, as in the latter. Apart from

mentioning it in passing, the texts take no further notice of this ga-

grâma and base their subsequent calculations exclusively on the sa-

and the ma-grâma.

Alterations

The difference in allocation of śrutis to the pa and the dha found in

the two grâmas is a basic and unalterable one. Apart from this, one

finds that the notes in each grâma can be subject to other alterations,

some comparable to our Western accidental sharps and flats. Includ-

ing the change of the sa- to the ma-grâma the Saṃgîtaratnâkara men-

tions twelve possible changes in śruti allocation, though, as some of

them overlap, they work out to only seven in reality. Out of these

seven only two (the kâkalî ni and the antara ga) are in general use and

taken into consideration when making permutations and combina-

tions.

As in the classical texts the names of the notes are attached to the

last of the series of their constituent śrutis, the basic sa-grâma presents

itself as follows:

1 2 3 4, 5 6 7, 8 9, 10 11 12 13, 14 15 16 17, 18 19 20, 21 22

sa, ri, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni

It is evident that, as the notes were understood to be at the end of

their constituent śrutis, the loss of a śruti at the beginning of a note

was perceptible only by the fact that the note below it was raised one

śruti in pitch.

The alterations are:1

(i) Sa, having four śrutis, comes down from the fourth to the third

śruti, at the same time giving its first śruti to kaiśika-ni (see the

1 Joanny Grosset, ‘Inde’, in Lalignac, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i

(Paris, 1913), p. 289.

SR, i. 3. 41–47:

ta eva vikṛtâvasthā dvādaśa pratipāditāḥ

cyuto’cyuto dvidhā śadjo dviśrutivikṛto bhavet

ṣaḍhārane kākalitve niṣādasya ca dṛśyate

ṣaḍhārane śrutim sādjim ṛṣabhaḥ saṃśṛito yadā

Page 250

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

209

eleventh alteration). Sa thus becomes a note of two śrutis. This is the first audibly altered note, cyuta (fallen) sa.

(ii) Sa remains on its proper, fourth, śruti, but has its two initial śrutis annexed by kākali-ni (see twelfth alteration). This sa is called acyuta (not-fallen) sa, and is not audible as an actually different note, as the position of the name-śruti is not changed.

(iii) Ri remains on its proper, seventh, śruti, but annexes sa's top-śruti. Sa thus becomes cyuta-sa (first alteration).

(iv) Ga shifts from its proper (ninth), to the tenth śruti, annexing the first śruti of ma and thus becoming a note of three śrutis. This is the second really new note, called sādhāraṇa (common) ga.

(v) Ga annexes one more śruti of ma, thus becoming a note of four śrutis. This is the third really new note, antara (medium) ga.

(vi) Ma comes down from its original (thirteenth) śruti to the twelfth, giving at the same time its first śruti to sādhāraṇa-ga and thus becoming a note of two śrutis. This is the fourth really new note, called cyuta (fallen) ma.

(vii) Ma remains on its original (thirteenth) śruti, but gives its first two śrutis to antara-ga. It is called acyuta-ma, analogous to acyuta-sa.

(viii) Pa cedes its upper śruti to dha (in the ma-grāma) and is called triśruti (three śruti) pa. This is the fifth really new note.

(ix) Pa gives its top śruti to dha, but annexes the top śruti of ma, which thereby becomes cyuta-ma. This pa is called kaiśika (fine as a hair) pa.

(x) Dha annexes the last śruti of pa, in the madhyama grāma, but remains on its original (twentieth) śruti. This is called vikrta (altered) dha.

(xi) Ni annexes the first śruti of sa. This is the sixth really new note, called kaiśika ni.

(xii) Ni takes the first two śrutis of sa. This is the seventh really new note, called kākali (soft) ni.

It will be seen that the alterations follow strictly parallel lines in the two tetrachords of the octave.

catuḥśrutitvam āyāti tadaiko vikṛto bhaved

sādhārane triśrutiḥ syād antarātve catuḥśrutīḥ

gāndhāra iti tadbhedau dvau niḥśankena kīrtitau

madhyamaḥ śadjavad vvedhā ‘ntarasādhāraṇāśrayāt

pañcamo madhyamagrāme triśrutiḥ kaiśike punah

madhyamasya śrutim prāpya catuḥśrutir iti dvidhā

dhaivato madhyamagrāme vikṛtaḥ syāc catuḥśrutīḥ

kaiśike kākalitve ca niṣādas tricatuḥśrutīḥ

prāpnoti vikṛtau bhedau dvāv iti dvādaśa smr tāḥ

B 2608

P

Page 251

210

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

Mûrcchanâs

The word grâma in its general sense means village or community.

In its musical sense1 it is defined as ‘a collection of notes and the dwelling place of the mûrcchanâs and their derivations’. Weber suggests in his Indische Streifen2 that the Greek word gamma in its musical sense of scale, is a derivation from the Sanskrit grâma, through some intermediate vernacular form. Certainly the modes in Greek music are derived from the basic scale very much as the mûrcchanâs are derived from the two grâmas. In the Indian theory each grâma gives rise to seven mûrcchanâs (extensions or gradations) by taking each successive note of the descending scale of the grâma in question as the basis of a new series of seven. Thus the first mûrcchanâ of the sa-grâma will be sa-ni, the second ni-dha, the third dha-pa, and so on, the seventh being ri-sa. It is expressly stated that the first mûrcchanâ of the sa-grâma starts on the middle sa, the first mûrcchanâ of the ma-grâma on the middle ma. It is clear that this procedure changes the relative position of tones and semitones within the octave in exactly the same way as does the Western method of building modes.

In each of the fourteen mûrcchanâs one can introduce either the kâkali-ni or the antara-ga or both kâkali and antara, which gives three possible variations to each basic pattern, adding up to fifty-six, i.e. four times fourteen, mûrcchanâs in all. Apart from these alterations, the Indian theory recognizes not only full, heptatonic (sampûrna) mûrcchanâs, but also hexatonic (ṣâḍava) and pentatonic (auḍava) varieties, each again with such alterations as the remaining notes allow. From this substratum the later modal system of râgas and râginîs could develop naturally.

Mûrcchanâs can be sung in their natural, diatonic order or in meandering sequences. In a detailed text like the Samgîtaratnâkara no possibility of combination or permutation is left unexplored. For the development of the modal system, however, only the basic heptatonic modes with their hexatonic and pentatonic varieties have to be considered, as it is from them that the classical system of râgas and râginîs was finally born.

Jâtis

There was, however, an intermediate stage in the development from mûrcchanâs to râgas, namely, the jâtis. Out of the fourteen mûrcchanâs

1 SR, i. 4. 1. SD, i. 68 :

grâmah svarasamûhah syân mûrcchanâdeh samâśrayah

tau dvau dharatale tatra syât ṣadjagrâma âdimah.

2 Albrecht Weber, Indische Streifen (Berlin, 1863), i. 3. 544.

Page 252

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

211

of the two grāmas only seven assumed the status of jāti or basic mode.

Four, those starting on sa, dha, ni, and ri were based on the corresponding mūrcchanās of the sa-grāma; three, starting from ma, ga, and pa, belonged to the magrāma. Contrary to the custom followed with the mūrcchanās, the sequence of the jātis is always given in ascending order: ṣādji is the first jāti, rṣabhi, not niṣādayati, the second.

In addition to the seven basic jātis, Bharata enumerates the names of eleven more, combinations of two or more of the first seven. Each jāti has its own ‘pillar notes’, incipient, final, and melodic centre, and some additional individual features, which stamp them clearly as the ancestors of the subsequent rāgas. In the Bharatanāṭyaśāstra the term rāga in its technical sense is yet unknown, but the rāgas incorporate all the melodic permutations and combinations of the older system to which numerous new characteristics have been added. For all its intricacies and delicate refinements, the classical system of rāgas has nothing intrinsically different from the Western modal system of the Middle Ages.

Pitch

One difference of approach to melodic structure in India and the West seems to be due to the fact that at a very early stage the Western systems fixed a definite pitch for each note, whereas everything in the Indian theory points to the fact that pitch was strictly relative and had no connexion with the names of the notes separately. The tendency to identify sa with c, very general in our days, cannot be much more than fifty years old and dates especially from the introduction and virulent spread of the portable harmonium through towns and villages.

The only indication as to pitch in the classical texts is1 in verses like the following, in which each successive note is identified with the cry of a bird or beast, not always the same creatures in each case.

The peacock utters the note sa;

the cātaka-bird ri;

the goat the note ga;

the krauñca bird ma;

the woodpecker with its clear voice pa;

the frog, excited by love, the note dha;

the elephant, hit on the head with the driver’s hook, utters the last note (ni) through its nose.

1 SR, i. 3. 48. SD, i. 152, 153:

ṣadjam vadati mayūrah ṛṣabhākhyam cātako brute

gāndhārākhyam chāgo nigadati pakṣi to madhyamam krauñcah

gadati pañcamam aiñcitavākapiko ratati dhaivatam unmādalarddurah

ṣṛṇisamāhatamastakakuñjaro gadati nāśikayā svaram antimam.

Page 253

212

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

Now, unless this has some, not immediately apparent, symbolical or mythological meaning, it has little meaning at all. For instance, the cry of the peacock consists of at least two notes which are certainly not even an octave apart; consequently it cannot stand for sa without further elucidation. In the same way anyone hearing the confusion of different noises emerging from a herd of goats would be sorely pressed if he had to determine the fixed pitch of ga.

The current practice—and there is no evidence that things were materially different in former days—is, that a singer chooses his sa according to his convenience, and keeps to it for the duration of the whole performance, irrespective of the number of râgas he presents. The same is the case with instrumentalists. A change of sa would entail a very laborious retuning of the accompanying drums, one of which usually gives the sa, the other the ma or pa. When more than one musician performs at the same function, each generally has his own drummer, or at least his own set of drums, which are tuned to the sa he has chosen.

Râgas

Clearly this is all that is required in a purely modal system. It is always this relative position of tones and semitones measured against a certain fixed point which determines the character of a mode, whether in the West or in the East, and the râgas—as the jâtis before them—have certain salient points of the scale which serve as a skeleton for their individual structure. These points bear the name of graha, amśa, and nyâsa:1

Graha is the incipient note, ‘the note that is placed at the beginning of a song’.

Amśa is the melodic centre, ‘the note that occurs often in the course of a performance’.

Nyâsa is the final, ‘the note that finishes a song’.

In the performance of a mode, whether a jâti or a râga, the first thing necessary is to establish these three sufficiently clearly, and in the lists of râgas in the textbooks, the notes of the scale that have these functions are always clearly given. It not infrequently happens that one note assumes two or even all three functions, so that the same note is graha, amśa, and nyâsa.

1 SR, i. 7. 30, 33, 38. SD, i. 146, 147 :

gîtâdau sthâpito yas tu sa grahasvara ucyate

nyâsaḥ svaras tu vijñeyo yas tu gîtasamâpakaḥ

(146)

bahulatvam prayogeṣu sa amśasvara ucyate

(147)

Page 254

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

213

It is customary to preface the performance of a râga—as it must have been with the jâtis before—with a prelude, called âlâpa, in which, against the note chosen for the function of sa, the salient points are established, as well as the secondary features, such as hexa- or pentatonality, frequency or paucity of certain notes or intervals, high, middle, or low tessitura, and so on.

It is the combination of all these secondary characteristics that makes a râga into something more than a simple mode, and gives it the quality expressed in the word râga as compared with jâti. The latter means simply genus, the former, however, from the root rañj (to colour), means everything which that root suggests: colour, emotion, and atmosphere. A râga is a mode which has developed such a special ethos that it cannot be mistaken for another combination of notes expressing a different emotion.1 Two râgas can be based on the same basic mode or jâti, and yet be entirely different in the mood that they convey. There can be several reasons for this effect; for instance, if the first has its amśa—the centre of musical gravity—near the drone, while in the second it soars far away from it, the first will create an atmosphere of sadness and depression, the second one of exuberance.

In this way the variations, permutations, and combinations are endless, especially when existing râgas are combined to form new, composite ones, partaking of the characteristics of two or even more components. In the classical râga system such a new creation usually bears the name of its parents, as, for instance, Megh-Malhâr, Gauḍ-Sarang, Mâlava-Kauśika, or Sindhu-Bhairavi. This tendency is traceable to the oldest times on record. Bharata mentions the phenomenon of jâti-sâdhâraṇa (community of jâtis) in which one jâti partakes of the notes of the other. One also can link up râgas by a process comparable to modulation, starting in one râga and skilfully introducing—after a suitable lapse of time—characteristics belonging to another, thus weaving what is called a râgamâlâ (garland of râgas). At a performance by a famous artist the listeners, that is to say those who have the intimate knowledge of the râgas performed, without which the refinements and variations of the presentation of the known features cannot be properly appreciated, will be startled and surprised the moment a foreign element is introduced and approve only when this leads towards the shape, feelings, and emotions of the next râga.

In the later stages of development of the classical system, that is to say, mainly after the influx of Muslim culture, which set the

1 Songs in the ‘pathetic’ râga Todi and the ‘devotional’ south Indian râga Begada are recorded in The History of Music in Sound (H.M.V.), i, side 12.

Page 255

214

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

seal on the differentiation between the music of north and south

India, we find a tendency in the north to carry the specialization so

far that the musical shape gives rise to a physical shape. The Râgas

are depicted as divine or human beings in surroundings that suggest

the atmosphere they create. The gender, râga and râginî, masculine

and feminine, had been established at a fairly early date; connexions

with times of day and night and seasons of the year are also enumer-

ated in the older classical texts, both in north and south India, but the

paintings, the last possible stage in personification, belong to the

north. Thus, for instance, the râga Megha (cloud) is described as

follows in the Sangîtadarpaṇa:1

Megha is heptatonic, having dha in the three functions of graha, aṃśa,

and nyâsa, in the mûrcchanâ uttarâyatâ (the third of the sa-grâma), to be

sung with the altered (vikrta) dha. A gush of erotic sentiment.

Râga Megha, the Youth, having a body like the blue lotus, with garments

like the moon, dressed in yellow, implored by thirsty câtaka-birds (who

drink only raindrops), with a smile sweet as nectar, is resplendent among

heroes, in the midst of clouds.

Only the north Indian system bases its classification on the gender

of the râgas. Usually one finds six râgas with five wives—râginî—

making a total of thirty-six, with innumerable offshoots classified as

children. It is a system that gives room to unbridled flights of fancy in

which no measure of uniformity between the different local traditions

has been achieved.

Side by side with it we find, however, the system of dividing the

râgas and râginîs into thaṭs or groups, more or less along the lines

of the different original basic modes, the jâtis of the Nâtyaśâstra. A

thaṭ groups together those râgas and râginîs which have a similar

construction. The word2 originally applied to the arrangement of the

movable frets of a stringed instrument such as the setar, for the play-

ing of one chosen mode, which of course included several râgas. One

generally recognizes ten thaṭs.

This second and less universal north Indian system, which, how-

ever, has gained a much wider popularity with the spread of music-

teaching in schools and colleges, is of a later date than the more

1 SD, ii. 108, 109:

meghaḥ pūrṇo dhatrayaḥ syād uttarāyatamūrchanā vikrtadhaivato geyaḥ śṛngārarasa-

pūrakaḥ

nīlotpalābhavapur indusamānacailah pītāmbaras trṣitacātakayācyamānaḥ

(108)

pīyūṣamandahasito ghanamadhyavartī vireṣu rājati yuvā kila megharāgaḥ

(109)

2 Fox Strangways, op. cit., p. 106.

Page 256

PLATE VII

(a)

(a) INDIAN VÎNÂ PLAYER

For further details see page xv.

(b) A BURMESE ORCHESTRA, SAING TYPE

For details of instruments see page xv.

Page 258

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

215

fantastic male râgas with five wives each, as shown by its name (taken

from the technique of an instrument imported from Persia). All the

same it has striking affinities with the universal south Indian system,

that of the melakartas which may be said to be a modified continua-

tion of the ancient arrangement in jâtis.

Melakartas, of which there are seventy-two, are divided into two

exactly parallel groups of thirty-six each, identical but for the cir-

cumstance that the first group uses natural fourths, the second aug-

mented fourths from sa. The râgas follow one another according to

their gradually increasing number of accidentals in the two tetra-

chords. The names are arranged according to a definite plan, so that

anyone who knows the codeword can tell at once which notes have

to be sung in a particular râga and also what place the râga occupies

in the melakarta scheme.

North and south use different names.1 The thap based on notes

corresponding to our major mode is called Bilâval in the north and

is the melakarta ‘Sankarâbharana’ in the south. The north Indian

Bhairavî that (our medieval Phrygian mode) is Hanumantodi in the

south, and so on. On the other hand, one finds that identical names,

such as Hindola, denote different râgas in north and south. All the

same, there is no basic difference between the two systems; one may

regard them as two dialects of the same language. Generally speaking,

the classifications as well as the system of south India as a whole are

more logical and bespeak a more mathematical intellect than the

pronouncedly emotional northern traditions.

As mentioned above, accomplished musicians establish the ethos

of the râga they are going to perform in the âlâpa. This unaccom-

panied prelude in free time may last for an hour or more. Each detail

of the râga that is being presented is minutely illustrated from all

possible angles. The accompanying drum comes in fully only when the

actual composition begins. In general a complete composition con-

sists of the following four divisions: asthai (the theme), antara (the

second subject), sañcâri (development), and âbhog (coda) which may

be replaced by a return to the asthai. The corresponding south Indian

divisions are pallavi, anupallavi, caranam, and pallavi.

For teaching in schools, the râgas are somewhat simplified and

instead of the improvised âlâpa, the children are taught a short song

which incorporates all the characteristics of the râga in question, as,

for instance, the following song, meant to illustrate the pentatonic

(audava) râga called Bhûp or Bhûpkalin (Ex. 293).

1 Fox Strangways, op. cit., p. 139, footnote.

Page 259

216

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

Ex. 293

Râga Bhûpkalin

In this song ga, the third note of the scale, quite clearly has the functions of graha, amsa, and nyâsa. According to Fox Strangways1 this represents the Poona tradition, as Bhûpkalin when sung according to the tradition of Gwalior has ri, the second note of the scale, in these functions. Ma, the fourth note, and ni, the seventh note, are missing, but the former is touched on once in the first bar, which is permissible. The way in which phrases have to be constructed in this râga is exemplified as succinctly as possible. Such an example differs from an âlâpa in two aspects: it has time (tâla) and it has words. The words, in this case, are a reminder of the real function of music. They say:

Oh Sádhu (wise man), notes open the realm of Heaven.

This râga is pentatonic according to the laws of music: —sa, re, ga, pa, dha, sa, dha, pa, ga, re, sa—. The notes can be sung in a topsy-turvey way, can’t they?

Tâlas

As for the time (tâla) of Ex. 293, this is one of the irregular time-divisions of Indian music, the time of ten, consisting of 4+2+4 beats, the strong beats being one, five, and seven. Consequently this is not a doubling of quintuple time, which also occurs and consists most commonly of 3+2 beats, though sometimes we find 2+3.

1 Fox Strangways, op. cit., chart facing p. 151.

Page 260

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

217

Ex. 294

(a)

3 + 2 (Tagore)

je dhru-vö pö-dö di-ye-cho ba - -ndhi

(b)

2 + 3 (Tagore)

prö ti - di - no a - mi.

Just as the time of ten is not composed of twice five, so the time of fourteen does not consist of twice seven. The time of seven is composed of 3+2+2, that of fourteen may be 4+4+2+4.

Ex. 295

(a)

3 + 2 + 2 (Kirtan)

pe - khö - lun 'sya mo - ru

dam go pe - kho - lun syam

Kaṭadōshkhushi (Kirtan)

(b)

bha - lo - hi cha n - do - no

bin - du bha - lo - hi cha

Both these examples are taken from the Kirtan music of Bengal, the devotional music of the Vaishnavas. This time of fourteen bears the name of kaṭa-dōshkhushi (the small dōshkhushi) and, as the name leads us to expect, we find also a madhyam (middle) and a bŏṛŏ (large) dōshkhushi. The madhyam-dōshkhushi consists of twice a kaṭa-dōsh-khushi and has twenty-eight units in a period. The accents in the second half are an exact replica of those in the kaṭa-dōshkhushi: 1 2 3 4, 5 6 7 8, 9 10, 11 12 13 14, 15 16 17 18, 19 20 21 22, 23 24, 25 26 27 28. The bŏrōdōshkhushi is again the madhyam dōshkhushi taken twice and consists consequently of fifty-six units. Both derive the right to be called separate tālas from the fact that their whole length is occupied by one musical phrase. The conception is the full period, not the component parts. Bar lines would give an entirely wrong emphasis.

Page 261

218

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

Such long periods give an ideal scope for interplay between drum and solo instrument, each making its own variations on the underlying rhythmical scheme and both landing triumphantly together on the first beat of the next period which is therefore called sam (together). This contest is followed with breathless attention and suspense by a well-trained audience, who heave a sigh of satisfaction when the tension is over. This enjoyment presupposes an extraordinarily well-developed sense of rhythm and a passion for cross-rhythm which seem to be inborn. Even quite small children are observed beating intricate rhythmic patterns when they get hold of an empty tin or anything that gives sound when beaten. On the other hand, keeping time as we feel it, progressing from stressed beat to stressed beat, seems to be difficult for Indians; one often sees boy scouts being drilled to march in step, but even when marking time they invariably lose the regular swing very soon.

The classical system of tālas embodies both the regular and the irregular times. As a matter of fact, the system is based on the binary principle. The smallest recognized duration in musical time is the anu-druta. Two anu-drutas make a druta. Two drutas make a laghu. Two laghus make a guru, but three laghus a pluta. The laghu is taken as time-unit and is also called mātra or mātrikā (measure).

The pluta1 is said to embody the Hindu Trinity with Brahma presiding. Thus the system embodies the ternary as well as the binary principle. This fact is further borne out by the inclusion of the virāma (rest) in the scheme of calculations. The virāma adds half the value to the note again. The complete list of time-values is thus sevenfold: the anudruta, the druta, the druta with virāma (three anudrutās), the laghu, the laghu with virāma (three drutās), the guru and the pluta (which is equal to the guru with virāma or three laghus).

This system has been preserved almost intact in south India, where it forms the mathematical basis of the current system of music. From the exposition given by Professor Sambamoorthy of the University of Madras,2 it appears that the unit is the anudruta and no longer the laghu. This anudruta equals the time-duration of a hand-clap. The druta consists of a hand-clap and a sideward movement of the right hand. The laghu consists of a hand-clap and two or more finger counts (i.e. putting the thumb against the different fingers). The laghu varies in duration according to whether it consists of a clap and two or more than two finger-counts, but in one and the same tāla not more than

1 SR, v. 258a. SD, vi. 50b: dipte trayo virincyādyā devatāḥ munibhiḥ smr̥tāḥ.

2 P. Sambamoorthy, The Musical Time Chart (Madras, n.d.).

Page 262

THE CLASSICAL SYSTEM

219

one species of laghu may occur. Five different kinds of laghu occur, equalling 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 units, in other words, a clap with two, three, four, six, or eight finger-counts. It appears that the fifth category is not in very frequent use.

The terms guru and pluta seem to have fallen out of use. With the remaining anudruta, druta, and laghu seven principal tālas are constructed:

  1. Eka, consisting of one laghu.

  2. Rūpaka, consisting of a druta and a laghu.

  3. Jampa, consisting of a laghu, an anudruta, and a druta.

  4. Maṭya, consisting of a laghu, a druta, and a laghu.

  5. Tripuṭa, consisting of a laghu and two drutas.

  6. Aṭa, consisting of two laghus and two drutas.

  7. Dhruva, consisting of a laghu, a druta, and two laghus.

Owing to the five different values which a laghu can have, these seven basic tālas immediately grow to a set of thirty-five principal tālas. The basic tāla, called Eka, consisting of one laghu only, can thus represent the times of three, four, five, seven, and nine units to a bar. The first variety of the basic tāla called Dhruva, consisting of a laghu, a druta, and two laghus, gives a total of eleven units to the bar, 3 + 2 + 3 + 3. The second variety of the same basic Dhruva gives fourteen units, 4 + 2 + 4 + 4, a general scheme not very different from the above quoted kaṭadōshkhushi of Bengal.

The time of ten of Ex. 293 would be defined as the second variety of Maṭya. As a matter of fact, the north and south Indian system of tālas again differ not in kind but in degree, the southern system having drawn the logical consequences of the underlying principles in a much more consistent fashion.

It is clear that this system of musical time has its roots in prosody. None of the irregular times could have sprung up independently of the recitation of poetical metres. Seen in this connexion they present no difficulty. An instance is provided by the Buddhist metre Buddha-priya of nineteen syllables, in which, contrary to the strict classical Sanskrit rules for metres of this class, one long may be dissolved occasionally into two short syllables, and even one short syllable into two ultra shorts:

– υ – υ υ / – υ – υ υ / υ υ υ – υ υ – υ – /

– υ – υ υ / υ υ υ – υ υ / – υ – – υ – /

If this metre is recited with a short note to a short, and a long note to a long syllable, with a lengthening of the last syllable of the line

Page 263

220

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

in accordance with the general custom, we see that the time of seven emerges naturally.

Ex. 296

Considering the intimate connexion of the classical theory with the system of Vedic chanting, and the prevalent custom of never reciting but always chanting poetry, the influence of the metres on the formation of musical times is hardly surprising.

There is little doubt, however, that influences from popular customs, for instance ordinary dances and working songs which demand a strong and regular beat, have also contributed to the actual development of tálas. Sometimes perhaps the musical tradition of invaders has made its contribution as well. Fox Strangways attributes the incidence of the lilting 6/8 time, called dâdra, in the north of India, to Muslim influences1.

In any case it would be surprising, in a country like India where drumming is so ancient and has reached such an astonishing degree of perfection, if there had not been a strong contribution from the purely instrumental side to the system of musical times, quite independently of, and side by side with, the pronounced vocal and literary bias expressed in the official formulation of the system in the classical texts.

CLASSICAL INSTRUMENTS

That instrumental music as a whole retains its character of a secondary art—at least in theory—in spite of the flowering of a very distinct and elaborate solo instrumental style, is proved by the defini-

1 Fox Strangways, op. cit., p. 300.

Page 264

CLASSICAL INSTRUMENTS

221

tion given as late as the seventeenth century in Saṃgītadarpana:1

'lending charm to both vocal music and dance.' At that time instru-

mental technique was actually at its zenith, and already for centuries

before that the voice must have been striving to imitate the intricacy

and speed of ornaments devised for solo instruments like the vīṇā. The

treatment of the voice in modern days is first and foremost a purely

instrumental one. In several of the most applauded styles the agelong

connexion between word and melody has been greatly weakened and

replaced by a show of instrumental agility in which words have no

importance, or hardly any, but which for perfection of speed, neat-

ness, and precision of intonation has perhaps no equal anywhere in the

world.

The Indian texts divide the instruments into four classes: ghana,

avanaddha, suṣira, and tata.

Idiophones (Ghana)

Under the first heading fall the percussion instruments which we

call idiophones: vibrating pieces of metal, like cymbals, which are

beaten together to produce sound. Ghana means body, according to

the texts,2 but it also can mean iron and pewter and anything com-

pact. Its mental association with the root han (to strike) probably

plays its part in the denomination of this class, but it is not mentioned

by way of explanation.

These instruments must have existed in a variety of shapes and

forms at a very early date. Even nowadays they have a strong con-

nexion with religion, being employed at religious ceremonies and

during processions on account of their spiritually purifying proper-

ties. Purely musically, they have no great value although they can

have a very important rhythmical function in supporting and accen-

tuating the development of figurations on the drum, whether played

solo or as an accompanying instrument. In Kathiawar the playing of

cymbals has developed into a separate art requiring great technical

skill.

Drums (Avanaddha)

The drums are grouped together under the heading avanaddha:

instruments which have their openings covered with stretched hides.3

This class is also very old and comprises a very great number of

1 SD, v. 1: vādyam nirūpyate gītaṛtayor anurañjakam.

2 SD, v. 4b: ghano mūrtiḥ.

3 SD, v. 3a, 4b: carmāvanaddhamvadanam vādyate paṅahādikam

avanaddham ca tat proktam.

Page 265

222

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

different forms. Anything in India may on occasion serve as a drum,

from an earthenware pitcher to a carefully tuned pair of drums like

the tabla, used for court-performances, or the large metal battle-

drums placed on the back of an elephant or a camel to lead troops

in battle or to head processions. The last mentioned kind is beaten

with sticks, but drums in India are generally played with the fingers

and parts of the palms of the hand with such delicacy and skill that it is a

joy to listen to a solo performance. In all its refinement the technique

takes years of strenuous practice to master. The different strokes of

the right and left hand are defined and named, and the combinations

and variations of the right- and left-hand strokes, together and separ-

ately, give an almost unlimited scope to the artist, especially within

the long phrases which the more intricate tālas present.

Prominent in our days are the pakhawaj and the tabla. The former

is a descendant of the classical mrdanga, still its present south Indian

name, and has a clay body of irregular cylindrical shape, tapering

slightly towards the left hand, with a large surface of parchment tuned

to the note chosen as a drone for the performance. It tapers much

more markedly towards the right hand, with a smaller stretch of parch-

ment, tuned to the fourth or fifth above the drone. The tuning is very

accurate and is effected by tightening or loosening the leather straps

which hold the parchment in place.

Even more prominent perhaps is the tabla, a pair of drums, really

the pakhawaj divided into two. The drum played by the left hand is

made of metal (brass) and is semi-spherical. The drum for the right

hand is made of wood and is cylindrical, only the top being open and

covered with parchment. The tuning, regulated by blocks between

the leather straps that keep the parchment in place, is the same as that

of the pakhawaj and carefully and painstakingly adhered to. In this

way the drums provide not only the rhythmical backbone of the per-

formance, but also a firm basis on which the singer can rely for his

pitch, and against which he can build his contrasts.

Considering the variety of indigenous drums, one would not sup-

pose that there was any need for importation; nevertheless names like

naqqârah and even tabla point in that direction, as they are of Arabic

origin.

Wind Instruments (Suṣira)

Among the suṣira (wind instruments), too, we find autochthonous

as well as foreign species. The different kinds of bamboo flutes cer-

tainly belong to India from time immemorial and also the snake-

Page 266

CLASSICAL INSTRUMENTS

223

charmers' pipes, based on the principle of the bagpipes and, most probably, some kinds of real bagpipes such as are found in Kashmir.

The conch also, which plays an important part in the majority of religious ceremonies and on all auspicious occasions as well, very likely belongs to the country and travelled from there into Buddhist lands such as Tibet, where it serves the same important religious ends.

Among the imported wind-instruments we may count the different varieties of the oboe class, such as the shannai (surnahi) which spread from the Near East across continents and to the far islands of the Indonesian archipelago.

In this class only the flute—apart from the conch—has definite religious associations, being the beloved instrument of Krishna.

There are numerous varieties of metal horns and trumpets, such as the sringa (horn) and sarpa (snake).

In modern times the clarinet has been introduced and is played happily in Indian style, to which it lends itself extremely well.

Stringed Instruments (Tata)

The fourth class, tata (stringed instruments) from the root tan (to stretch), again provides a great variety of indigenous and imported species.

The most revered of all is the vînâ, a fretted plucked instrument.

In its most primitive form the vînâ consists of a hollow bamboo stave with a gourd attached to the underside at both ends.

The strings run parallel to the body on the upper side, passing across very high frets fixed to the body with wax.

They are attached to the tuning pegs at one end and to a fixed tailpiece at the other.

It is played either resting on the ground on its gourds, or held upright against the body, the upper gourd resting on the left shoulder.

In another form of vînâ, popular in south India, the lower gourd has coalesced with the bamboo stave, which now rises out of it; the second gourd is loosely attached to the top near the tuning pegs.

The frets are fixed in this form, too.

The playing is usually done with a triangular plectrum of silver or steel wire slipped over the nail of the index finger of the right hand.

The melody is played on the four chief strings.

Three more strings run along the right side, tuned to the drone, the fifth (or fourth) and the octave respectively, and are struck intermittently with the other fingers of the right hand to provide the accompaniment.

This instrument is capable of giving a wide variety of tone-colour, but its quality is extremely delicate and intimate, so that it is best enjoyed in a small room in which the finely spun ornamentation does not get lost in space.

One way of creating these ornaments is to pull the string sideways with the fingers of the left hand after it has been

Page 267

224

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

vigorously struck, and thus to vary the tension, producing various

śrutis as long as the vibration lasts.

The vînâ is one of the constant attributes of the Goddess of Learn-

ing, Sarasvatî, and in olden times it was one of the indispensable

objects in a decent home for the welcome of a guest.1 In the course

of history the vînâ has had many forms, and it is not at all certain

that the vînâ of the centuries B.C. looked like the vînâ of our days. It

seems probable that vînâ was originally a generic name for stringed

instruments; from ancient sculptures it is certain that a form existed

with a boat-shaped body from which an arched neck stuck out, look-

ing very much like the Egyptian harp. That form has now completely

disappeared, but kindred forms had until recently survived in Burma.

In the texts we find mention of vînâs with one, two, three, seven, nine,

and twenty-one strings. (See pl. 7 (b).)

The kinnarî has three gourds, one in the middle, fixed sideways.

The tambura has only one gourd, incorporated in the body, and has

four strings but no frets. It is always played with open strings as an

accompaniment, either by the singer himself or by one or two assis-

tants immediately behind him. The tuning is the drone, the fifth

(or fourth) and twice the octave, and the strings are sounded

uninterruptedly to create an unchanging background for the chosen

râga.

Another favourite plucked instrument is the setar, of Persian

origin. It has movable frets which can be adjusted to the varying

arrangements of notes within the octave according to thât. It has a

layer of sympathetic strings tuned to the notes of the octave, vibrating

in consonance with the notes struck on the main strings, which gives

a pleasant diffuse echo-effect. The technique of the setar has great

affinity with that of the vînâ.

The sarod, played with a plectrum held between the fingers, has no

frets. It has a balalaika-like tone-quality and a greater carrying power

than most Indian instruments.

A bowed instrument is the sarangi, an instrument with a most pleas-

ing tone-quality and good carrying power, but not in great social

favour on account of its association with dancing-girls, in our days

not a socially acceptable class. A peculiar legato quality is achieved

on this instrument by pressing the nails of the left hand against the

1 Mahâbhârata Udyogaparvan, 40, 10-11;

ajokṣā candanāṁ vīnā adarśo madhusarpiṣṭ

viṣam audumbarāṁ śaṅkhaḥ svarnanabho gorocanā

(10)

śreṣṭhāpayitavyāni dhanyāni manur abravīt

devabrāhmaṇapūjārtham atithīnāṁ ca Bhārata.

(11)

Page 268

CLASSICAL INSTRUMENTS

225

melody string—not the tip of the finger on it—and sliding them along

the string to the next note.1 The dilruba and the esraj—almost

identical in appearance and technique—are two more bowed in-

struments, each with a layer of sympathetic strings. Both are socially

acceptable, and both are of Persian origin.

In the villages there is a kind of very primitive small violin, made

of half a coconut-shell with a bamboo neck attached to it, and played

with a very arched bow. Skilled players extract a plaintive, but not

at all unpleasant, sound from this toy. The European violin has been

adopted with enthusiasm and serves its new masters very well, since

it has a much more powerful tone than any of the indigenous instru-

ments and is capable of producing all the refined shades of intonation

essential to proper Indian music. It is so much at home in India now

that it is counted as their own by many Indian musicians, especially

in the south.

Unfortunately the Hawaiian guitar has also made its appearance

and makes a powerful appeal, probably through its excessive slurring

power, a continuous tone always being sought after in Indian music.

Unmitigated harm has been done to Indian music by the introduc-

tion, probably through missionaries, of a miniature form of portable

harmonium which, by its fixed keyboard and haphazard tuning—

earnest but not altogether successful attempts at the European tem-

pered scale—plays havoc with the delicate tonal differences essential

to the system of rāgas and rāginīs and with the accurate aural percep-

tion of the Indian musician. The cheapness and the ease with which

one can master its technique—up to a point—have added to its

dissemination. It can be found in the most isolated and otherwise

unspoiled villages. It is mass-produced in India itself, and it seems

unlikely now that the evil can ever be eradicated.

MODERN DEVELOPMENTS

Indian music is passing through a critical period. The impact of the

West has shaken its foundations more drastically than foreign in-

fluences have ever done before. Mistaken attempts to foist the finished

Western system of harmony on to the perfect modal system of Indian

monophony have been made for the last hundred years, not only by

missionaries but also by enthusiastic Indian admirers of European

culture. In this process the delicate structure of Indian music is

crushed out of existence. Lately the music of the films, and jazz

with its coarse appeal, have not beckoned in vain.

1 A specimen of sarangi music is recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i,

side 12.

B 3608

Q

Page 269

226

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

In this unfortunate development the radio plays an important part, but it also gives the champions of the severe classical style an opportunity to reach the ears of a great many more people than would have had the opportunity to hear this music in olden days. The medieval attitude of a master teaching only a few chosen pupils and not divulging his best to the uninitiated is still strong. Music for the masses is a very recent trend, and music teaching now tends to move away from the intimate teacher-pupil connexion towards class-teaching in schools and colleges. A certain amount of standardization has been unavoidable in the course of this development. Eminent men such as the late Pandit Bhatkhande—a Mahratta by birth but with enormous influence over the whole of north India, and founder of the Marris College of Music of the University of Lucknow—have striven to find a common denominator of the different current traditions of rāgas and rāginīs and fix them by means of notation, which had not been done systematically in the past. Yet the basis of the present system of notation is very ancient. It is a tonic sol-fa system in which the names of the notes, sa and so on, are used to indicate the melodic line with its time divisions.

This is a very strongly supported movement strengthened also by the growth of nationalistic feeling. But new developments, breaking away from the traditional system, are not lacking. The very perfection of that system precluded further development, and adventurous spirits have had to look for new avenues for their creative impulses. They have but rarely understood that the new developments must have their roots in Indian music itself to be viable, yet there are indications that that understanding is dawning. After a period of Western influence, Rabindranath Tagore turned to the folk-melodies of Bengal for inspiration, and all over India isolated poets and musicians are drawing their strength from the music of the people, often with very felicitous results. For Indian folk-music, which ranges from the primitive two-note sing-song of the Chencus of the jungles of Hyderabad to the stirring war-ballads of the bards of Rajputana and the mystical longing of the princess-saint Mirabai, is an expression of the whole life of the people, with their joys and sorrows. It is the depository of their traditional wisdom and their religious yearnings as well as of the pleasures and pastimes of everyday life.1 Side by side with this hopeful trend of a group of poet-musicians to get their inspiration from folk-music, classical musicians are

1 Six examples of Indian folk-music are recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, sides 10 and 11.

Page 270

feeling their way to a widening of tonal expression along polyphonic lines, but starting from Indian premises. There is nothing in the Indian system which would prevent a natural development in that direction, provided that the impulses spring not from intellectual curiosity, but from inner necessity.

Page 271

V

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

By Henry George Farmer

INTRODUCTION

So far as our present knowledge goes, the earliest civilization was that

of Mesopotamia, where an amazingly advanced stage of society existed

in the fourth millennium B.C. at the very latest. The centre of this cul-

tural elevation was in southern Mesopotamia, a land often called

Babylonia, between 30° and 34° north latitude. In the upper part of

this land, later called Akkad, was a linguistically Semitic group, while

in the lower part there may have been other Semites. Before 4000 B.C.

the latter were supplanted by a people called Sumerians, who spoke

a non-Semitic tongue so strange that we cannot even say from whence

they came. Their land was known as Sumer. The culture of the new-

comers is generally considered to have been far in advance of that of

the land of their adoption, so much so that it soon influenced both

Akkad in the north and contiguous territories. In spite of this, it

seems unwise to refer to the people of either Sumer or Akkad, per se,

as the creators or stabilizers of this culture, since we know little or

nothing of the earlier history of either.

If we view the movement of history in the light of the conditions

which increase men's knowledge, it seems that the most potent results

are to be found where the greatest number of culture-contacts meet.

For this reason, it is of Mesopotamian civilization that we speak,

rather than of Sumerian or Akkadian. Thus we are compelled to look

beyond strictly geographical limits in our survey of Mesopotamian

music of the distant past, for indeed all peoples on what Breasted

calls 'the fertile crescent' and its periphery must come within this

purview, because it was by reason of admixture of stock, contrasts in

habits, diversities in religion, and even friction of interests, that cross-

fertilizations of ideas were produced, which made the supreme great-

ness and vitality of Mesopotamian civilization possible.

Nowadays, when scarcely a month passes without some fresh

archaeological discovery, or a new philological deduction being regis-

tered, it is difficult to speak with any chronological certainty. That

being so, many of the early dates that will be posited in what follows

Page 272

must be considered simply as helpful stepping-stones, placed temporarily to accommodate the eye and mind in their stride across the stream of history, until a more durable bridge has been erected. The readjustments so ably determined and summarized by Albright1 have persuaded us, with some latitude, to draw up the following table which enables the reader to appreciate why certain dates do not synchronize with those of Dr. Curt Sachs and the late Canon F. W. Galpin who have contributed so much to our knowledge of the music of the peoples of the Mesopotamian past.

Fifth Millennium B.C.

The Sumerians in Babylonia

Fourth Millennium B.C.

Al-‘Ubaid, Warka, and Jamdat Nasr periods

Third Millennium B.C.

Early Dynasty I . . . . Twenty-eighth century

Royal Tombs of Ur. . . . Twenty-fifth century

Akkad Dynasty . . . c. 2360–2180

Guti Dynasty . . . c. 2190–2065

Ur Dynasty III . . . c. 2070–1960

Second Millennium B.C.

Babylonian Dynasty I . . c. 1830

Babylonian Dynasty II (Sea Kings) . c. 1675

Babylonian Dynasty III (Kassites) . c. 1600

Assyrian Hegemony (Shalmaneser I) . c. 1270–606

First Millennium B.C.

Chaldaean Dynasty . . . 626

Achaemenid Dynasty . . . 538–331

Seleucid Dynasty . . . 312–65

THE PRIMITIVE ELEMENT IN MUSIC

What first presents itself in early Mesopotamia is a well-established culture already far advanced, the more glittering features of which have the appearance of an origin elsewhere. Although the older literature of Sumer, such as the Gilgamesh Epic, offers vague hints

1 Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, nos. 77, 78 (1940), 88 (1942).

Page 273

230

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

of what an earlier culture may have been, we are not able to experience so interesting a panorama as the gradual passage from that community of reed huts at Ur to the civitas. There is, however, abundant evidence of the survival of primitive culture in Mesopotamian civilization, not merely at the dawn of history in this land at the turn of the fifth millennium B.C., but even down to the Christian era.

When we observe that Assyrian bells are embossed with symbols of Ea, the divine Patron of Music, it may be assumed that it is a relic of the animistic past.1 The skin head of the Babylonian drum (balag) was made from the hide of a bull, and as late as the Seleucid era (312 B.C.) the Temple of Ea (Lumḫa) was the place of an elaborate ritual at the fixing of the skin head on this sacred instrument.2 The image of a bull was also a prominent feature on the sound-chest of the grand kithara (? algar),3 so that its resonance would be amplified in mind if not in ears. Like those animals who play instruments in Mesopotamian art remains,4 and those gods, kings, priests, and mummers, dressed in animal or fish-like garb, they recall earlier totemistic conceits.5 Yet we must not interpret these semeio-lineaments wholly by this cause, since there must have existed a purely naturalistic raison d'être sometimes. There are two or three well-known art remains which show animals listening to, or in the presence of, music, in what might readily be considered bucolic scenes.6 The Mesopotamian psalms and lamentations continually voice complaint against the gods for searing and flooding the land, for the thoughts of the people were ever with their herds and harvests,7 and they considered the bull in the animal world and the reed in the vegetable world as antithetical. Their psalms tell of strength in the ‘gigantic steer’ and weakness in the ‘crouching reed’. This symbolism of puissance and docility, force and persuasion, was reflected in the deafening roar of the drum (i.e. the bull) and in the plaintive sigh of the pipe (i.e. the reed), for they were the ‘outward visible sign’ of an ‘inward spiritual grace’. Being a highly imaginative people they resorted to symbolism in many ways, but none is more intriguing than their use

1 M. Jastrow, Bildermappe zur Religion Babyloniens und Assyriens (Giessen, 1912), fig. 70.

2 Revue d'Assyriologie, xvi (1919), pp. 145 ff.

3 F. W. Galpin, The Music of the Sumerians and their immediate successors the Babylonians and Assyrians (Cambridge, 1937), pl. vii.

4 Ibid., pls. iv, v, vii, viii.

5 C. J. Gadd, History and Monuments of Ur (London, 1929), pp. 36 ff.

6 Galpin, op. cit., pls. ii, 2; iv, 1; viii, 6, 7.

7 S. Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies (Paris, 1913), pp. 1 ff.

Page 274

THE PRIMITIVE ELEMENT IN MUSIC 231

of sound for this purpose, as Heuzey,1 King,2 and Thureau-Dangin3

have observed.

A close connexion between gods and music in Mesopotamia is

significant. One of the most ancient of the gods, Ea, the ruler of the

deep, had his name written with a sign which stood for drum (balag),4

the dread sound of which was the personification of his essence. Then

there was Ramman, who commanded the thunder and the winds. He

was conceived as the 'spirit of sonorous voice',5 which was in keeping

with the ancestor of Thor, although it was probably because of its

wind-like tone that the reed-pipe (halhallatu) was likened to his

breath.6 One of the names of the goddess Ishtar, the virgin mother,

was 'the soft reed-pipe', and her partner, Tammuz, was the 'god of

the tender voice',7 while the name 'singer' (zammēru) was given to

another of the immortals.8 It is such fantasies, 'nothing but vain'

perhaps, in which sound, as the anima of all phenomena, was used

to adjure and conjure benevolent and malevolent nature, that were

the foundation upon which the later elaborate temple services of

Mesopotamia were built.

THE MUSIC OF THE TEMPLES

All the cities of the Mesopotamian plains had their temples in the

fourth millennium B.C. Within their sacred precincts were worshipped

the many gods of their pantheons. Here, priests and liturgists, mathe-

maticians and astrologers, passed their lives in quiet seclusion,9 for

the temple was the centre of the intellectual and cultural life of the

day.10 First among the liturgists was the precentor, known in Sumerian

as the gala (Akkadian kalū). Unlike the priest, he was not a con-

secrated functionary, although it was his duty to intone the liturgic

cantillation.11 There seem to have been three classes of precentor in

the Sumerian period, the higher, intermediate, and lower, the last

being counted in a menial grade. That many a kalū was only a part-

time official is borne out by several contracts, but the existence of the

1 Revue d'Assyriologie, ix (1912), pp. 85 ff.

2 A History of Sumer and Akkad (London, 1910), pp. 74 ff.

3 Sumerische und Akkadische Königsinschriften (1907), pp. 118 ff.

4 Hastings' Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, ix (Edinburgh, 1917), p. 14.

5 Langdon, Sumerian and Babylonian Psalms (Paris, 1909), pp. 26 ff.

6 C. Virolleaud, Astrologie chaldéenne (Paris, 1908), Adad. xi.

7 Langdon, op. cit., p. 301.

8 C. Virolleaud et F. Pélagaud, in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), p. 45.

9 Langdon, Tammuz and Ishtar (Oxford, 1914), p. 184.

10 M. Jastrow, Aspects of Religious Belief and Practice in Babylonia and Assyria (New York, 1911), p. 273.

11 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, pp. x ff.

Page 275

232

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

Sumerian galamah (Akkadian kalamahhu) or chief precentor, who held the highest position in the city, reveals the sacred significance of his office.

These precentors were formed into guilds and they were housed, seemingly, in the temple college,1 just as were vicars-choral in Christian Europe.2 Here they were taught the mysteries of their sacred office, including a precise knowledge of the cantillation (kalūtu) which, like the prae-cantus of the Christian Church, was an art requiring a long training. The Sumerian language, like the Latin in the Roman Church, was the language of the liturgies although, later, an interlinear Akkadian version existed. As in Christian lands, these precentors of Mesopotamia were well versed in the sciences, and we have an astrological report signed by a precentor. Yet their most important work in this respect was as copyists and editors of the temple liturgies, so many of which have been preserved together with the names of the copyists.

The ordinary temple musician was called in Sumerian the nar (Akkadian nāru), the Semitic word being also used, probably, for 'musician' in the generic sense.3 We cannot be sure of the nāru's actual duties, but he was possibly a chorister who, with others, made the responses in the liturgies. That the 'chorister' also played upon an instrument is well attested. Langdon says that his frequent connexion with private penitential services, especially those connected with magic, led to his ultimate dissociation from public services. At burial services it was the nāru and not the kalū who contributed to the penitential psalming and wailing.4 It is certain that the nāru was later seen quite frequently in the secular sphere. Equally important was the Sumerian ilukaka (Akkadian, zammēru), whose specific function is not easy to determine since the term often equates with nāru. Virolleaud and Pélagaud opine that while nāru signifies the generic term for 'musician', zammēru stands for 'instrumentalist'.5 Yet he was definitely a singer also, and took part in the liturgies. Even Langdon does not help us except to say that the zammēru sang to an instrument and that he was distinct from the nāru.6

1 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xii.

2 H. G. Farmer, A History of Music in Scotland (London, 1947), p. 55.

3 Langdon looks upon the nāru as one who 'leads the congregation' in public worship, just as the Presbyterian 'uptaker of psalms' did in the Scottish kirk; the same authority identifies 'the familiar figure on seals, who leads a penitent to his god' as the nāru. See Langdon, Babylonian Penitential Psalms (Paris, 1927), p. v.

4 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, pp. xxvii ff.

5 Op cit., p. 44.

6 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxvi.

Page 276

THE MUSIC OF THE TEMPLES

233

The place in the temple and the duties in general of all these temple and extra-mural musical functionaries are nowhere definitely described. One imagines that the precentor specialized in the cantillation (kalūtu) and sometimes, if not generally, accompanied himself on an instrument. It is prescribed in some texts when ‘he shall sing’ (izamur) and when ‘he [the patient] shall recite’ (imannū). The chorister's business, whether he was a nāru or zammēru, was the chant called in Sumerian sir (Akkadian širḫu). Deimel (447b),1 however, cites the Akkadian šēru as ‘a section of a song’, a word cognate with the Hebrew šīr. Then there was the penitential psalm (Akkadian zamāru), which has a derived name in the Hebrew mizmōr, and it is possible that the Akkadian zamar tušgi (√šigū) and the zamar šēri can be matched in the Hebrew mizmōr šiggaiōn and the mizmōr šīr (Psalms, vii, lxvii, lxviii).2 Lamentation proper in Akkadian was inḫu, and its character is preserved in the neḥī of Micah (ii, 4) and the nauḥ of the Arabs. The cult wail may have been known as alālu, although Deimel says ‘shouts of joy’. If correct it may have given rise to the name of the sixth month (elūl), which was the time of wailing for Tammuz,3 still kept by the Jews.

Of the actual music of the Mesopotamian temples or elsewhere we know but little, although the vehicle by which it was expressed has come down to us in vast treasures by way of liturgies, breviaries, psalms, and songs, edited by Langdon, Reisner, Ebeling, and others. Indeed Langdon has said that a full index of this musical material ‘would rival that of the Roman or Anglican books of devotion’.4 These public services date back to Sumerian days, at which date they consisted of but a single psalm or hymn, generally a lamentation, termed in Sumerian an eršemma, which strictly meant ‘a psalm or hymn set to a reed-pipe. Yet other instruments were also used to accompany the psalm—the flute (tig), drum (balag), kettledrum (lilis), and tambourine (adapa)—and in the course of time the music came to be known by the name of the complementary instrument.5 This one-psalm service passed away before the time of the first Babylonian dynasty (1830 B.C.), when the eršemma was supplanted by a complete liturgical service called a kišub. These new services had been compiled by the schools of liturgists who had combined several of the

1 Akkadisch-Sumerisches Glossar (Rome, 1937).

2 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1921), pp. 175 ff. Cf. Revue d'Assyriologie, xviii (1921), p. 41. Deimel (479b) gives tešqū and teškū.

3 Hastings' Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, ix (Edinburgh, 1917), p. 14. A. Deimel, op. cit., p. 13. Cf. the Greek ἀλαλά.

4 Sumerian and Babylonian Psalms, p. x.

5 Ibid., p. ix.

Page 277

234

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

eršemma type of psalms or hymns which had a common appeal.

‘Here’, to quote Langdon, ‘we have extremely long services com-

posed of a succession of melodies characterized by changing refrains

and musical motifs.’

Each liturgy was now called a ‘series’ (iškaru), and it is found with

as few as five psalms or hymns and as many as twenty-seven. At a later

period the term eršemma was revived as an intercessional hymn at the

end of a kišub.1 According to Langdon, our foremost authority on

the subject, when the public services began to develop in this way, the

music, which had hitherto been confined to a single instrument, now

became based on what seems to be a wider instrumental conception.2

We read for example, in an addendum to the series called Exalted

Heaven:3

The precentors a chant to the drum (balaggu) shall sing.

To the sacred kettledrums (uppu and lilissu) shall sing.

To the reed-pipe (halhallatu) and tambourine (manzû) shall sing.

Liturgies now came to be known by their first lines,4 and so perhaps

their melodies also. Many of the latter are frequently mentioned, and

Langdon says ‘that a certain tune was associated with all passages

characterized by this refrain’.5 One might be reading an early English

psalter when we see a rubric which says: ‘A song to the tune “Thou

wilt not cast me down”.’ That the kišub was attended by processional

movements on the part of the choir is also stressed by Langdon, who

suggests that a ‘choral march’—‘a real recessional’—came at the end

of the litany.6 Interludes are also found in lengthy litanies, and one

may perhaps see in these an explanation of the much discussed selah

of the Old Testament.

That the antiphon (gišgigal) was fairly common seems to be ac-

cepted by Langdon,7 Cumming,8 and Galpin,9 and it may be men-

tioned that in later days the Akkadian word enû meant ‘answer’,

‘repeat’. It may have been derived from the Sumerian en (Akkadian

šiptu).10 There is a Babylonian antiphonal lamentation in Akkadian

1 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xli. Cf. his statement in Babylonian Penitential

Psalms, p. v.

2 Ibid., p. xlii.

3 Langdon, Sumerian and Babylonian Psalms, pp. 70–71; Babylonian Liturgies,

pp. viii ff.

4 Langdon, Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms (Philadelphia, 1919), p. 325.

5 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxxv.

6 Ibid., p. xlviii.

7 Babylonian Liturgies (Paris, 1913), p. 1.

8 The Assyrian and Hebrew Hymns of Praise (New York, 1934) pp. 72 ff.

9 Op. cit., p. 62.

10 Langdon, Babylonian Penitential Psalms, pp. vii, 48–52.

Page 278

THE MUSIC OF THE TEMPLES

235

of a late period.1 which is a copy of a Sumerian original of the

time of Narām-Sin (c. 2280 B.C.). In this the women of various towns

participated. Sidney Smith suggests that they were divided into two

groups and that ‘each half-chorus sang alternately’ the lines which

were appropriate to themselves in the destruction of their lands by

the Guti.2 Perhaps a more moving example of an antiphon is the

Liturgy and Prayer to the Moon God, which dates from the time of

Dungi (twenty-first century B.C.). It is an appeal to the god Sin to

care for flocks and harvests, with twin recurring refrains, seemingly

responsory.3

In addition to the instruments mentioned as being used in the

kišub services, the harp (zagsal) also had a recognized place.4 Further,

those epical productions known as the zagsal compositions may very

well have been accompanied by this harp.5 Galpin says that it was

used during the oracles of the high-priest.6 Before closing this section

it may be advisable to mention that while Langdon generally refers

to the kišub as being a ‘choral service’,7 and frequently speaks of

‘melodies’,8 we must always understand that these terms merely re-

late to what was set to music, since not a solitary note has come down

to us save what may be divined from the so-called ‘notation’ which

will be dealt with later. In any case, Mesopotamian temple music was

cantus in its primitive significance, for the simple reason that the

liturgy demanded a fixed and immutable chant, any variation from

which by precentor or chorister would be unthinkable, since its whole

efficacy depended on a rigid interpretation. That a particular chant

had a certain ethos in a theurgic sense is frequently mentioned in

Mesopotamian documents, and we read of the kalū and nāru who

‘know the melodies’ and are ‘masters of the musical movements’,

meaning the appropriate liturgic and ethoidal chants. This was an

absolute desideratum, since the gods were equally skilled, as we know

from the epithet of the goddess Ishtar, the patroness of litanies, as the

one ‘who understands the measures’ of the psalming.9 As for the

verbal form and content of the Mesopotamian liturgy Langdon has

1 Cf. Galpin, op. cit., p. 62. Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, xix; Sumerian and Baby-

lonian Psalms, p. 176.

2 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1932), pp. 303 ff.

3 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. 1. The refrain was quite common (pp. 70-71).

4 F. Martin, Textes religieux assyriens et babyloniens (Paris, 1903), p. 196.

5 Langdon, Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms, p. 233. Cf. his Sumerian Liturgical

Texts (Philadelphia, 1917), pp. 130 ff.

6 Op. cit., p. 53.

7 Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms, p. 245.

8 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1921), p. 170.

9 Langdon, Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms, p. 237.

Page 279

236

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

rightly praised it as ‘the greatest system of musical ritual in any

ancient religion’.

1

SECULAR MUSIC

Words alone are sometimes graciously eloquent of purpose, and at

the very threshold stands the generic Akkadian word for ‘music’,

nigūtu or ningūtu, which also has the connotation of ‘joy’, ‘merry-

making’. Alālu, which also meant ‘singing’, had a similar import.

This is admirably illustrated on an archaic seal in the Louvre which

displays a bucolic scene, seemingly of a peasant playing a flute to one

of his flock or herd.

2

Such scenes are not uncommon in the art re-

mains, and whilst they may be mere cameos, we can descry in them

the part played by music in the lives of the people. Indeed in some

instances it was considered as part of education.

3

It has been said

that ‘the old danced whilst the young made music’.

4

One imagines

that there were toil songs among the ancient Semites, as we know in

the ‘well song’ of Exodus xxi. 17. Singers and drummers, in a picture

of Assyrians felling palm-trees, certainly appear to be facilitating

labour. Indeed an Assyrian annalist gives a picture of the Arabs who,

as prisoners of war, were working as slaves at Nineveh, where they

sang their native songs to relieve their sorrows. Their exotic music

fascinated the idle Assyrians who begged for more.

5

One of the oldest Sumerian art remains, the Standard of Ur

(twenty-fifth century B.C.), depicts a singer and a performer on the

grand kithara (? algar) at a royal banquet, which was planned to

‘dispel gloom’.

6

Several seals from the same period also suggest that

the instruments shown accompany festive scenes, even with dancing.

7

Here, not only the grand kithara, but the harp (zagsal), sistrum, and

clappers, play their part. Then there are the many representations of

animals, or mummers dressed as such, playing instruments of music—

kitharas, harps, pandores, tambourines, drums, and the like—which

scarcely represent religious scenes.

8

All these bear testimony that from

early Sumerian to late Assyrian days, music was part and parcel of

social life in Mesopotamia.

9

1 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxxiv.

2 F. Lajard, Introduction à l’étude du culte public et des mystères de Mithra (Paris,

1847), pl. xxix, 7.

3 B. Meissner, Babylonien und Assyrien, ii (Heidelberg, 1925), pp. 320, 328.

4 Ibid. ii, p. 331.

5 E. Schrader, Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, ii (Berlin, 1889 et seq.), p. 234.

6 Antiquaries Journal, viii (1928), pl. lix.

7 Galpin, op. cit., pl. ii.

8 Ibid., pls. v, viii.

9 P. Dhorme, Textes religieux assyro-babyloniens (Paris, 1903), p. 375.

Page 280

SECULAR MUSIC

237

Assyria, from quite an early period, was certainly very fond of secular as well as religious music. In the martial moments of Tiglath-pileser I (c. 1113 B.C.) we read of a grand personage in the royal palace named the rab zammēre (‘chief musician’), and we are informed that the royal musicians gave public performances ‘to gladden the hearts of the people of Ashur’.1 It is worth noting that when the victorious Assyrian generals put a city to the sword, they generally spared the musicians, who were sent to Nineveh with the valuable booty. To the very last days, music played a wholesome part in Assyrian social life, even though most of our testimony comes from regal sources.

From the time of Ashur-naṣir-pal III (c. 883-859 B.C.) we get ample lithographic material of music and musical instruments. First we have the sculptured slabs in the British Museum showing two players on the lower-chested harp (zagsal) (pl. 8 (a)). Sargon (c. 722-705 B.C.) also employed the joyous art in the celebrations consequent on his widely trumpeted victories.2 A probable sidelight on alien influence on Assyrian music is furnished about the year 701 B.C. when Sennacherib invaded Syria, sending one of his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. To soften the wrath of the conqueror, the king of Judah sent ‘his wives and his daughters, his musicians both male and female’ as a gift, hoping that he himself might be spared.3 From this period dates a fine bas-relief in the British Museum showing players on the upper-chested harp and the diagonal kithara. It was the two court functionaries facing them with batons of office in their hands which led Rawlinson to suppose that they were time-beaters.4

In the year of the ascent of Esar-haddon (680-669 B.C.) to the throne, we read that when he re-entered Nineveh it was ‘with musicians playing the lower-chested harp (zagsal)’.5 The British Museum bas-reliefs also illustrate the artistic interests of Ashur-bāni-pal (668-626 B.C.). When Teumman, the Elamite king, invaded Assyrian territory, Ashur-bāni-pal sought the goddess Ishtar for counsel. She quietened his fears and bade him turn to music and feasting.6 He obeyed, and in the midst of these pleasures came the news of the defeat and death of Teumman. The joyous scenes of the victory celebrations, with which music went hand in hand, have been recorded

1 Schrader, op. cit. i, p. 46.

2 Hastings’ Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, ix, p. 14.

3 Schrader, op. cit. ii, pp. 96-97.

4 G. Rawlinson, The Five Great Monarchies, ii (London, 1854), pp. 167 f; Kinsky, op. cit., p. 3.

5 Schrader, op. cit. ii, pp. 126-7.

6 Ibid. ii, p. 252.

Page 281

238

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

in stone.1 The great orchestra and choir of the vanquished king are

delineated on another British Museum sculpture (pl. 8 (c)). The former

consists of seven performers on the upper-chested harp, one on the

lower-chested harp, two on the double reed-pipe, and one on a drum.

The choir was made up of six women and nine children,2 and one

of the former indulges in the favourite Eastern vocal practice of

squeezing the larynx by the hand, to effect the high notes.

The Old Testament story in the book of Daniel (iii), written in the

second century B.C., has an abiding interest, if only because of the

instrumentation of that much-discussed orchestra of the Chaldaean

king Nebuchadnezzar (604–562 B.C.). It comprised the ‘qarnā (horn),

mašrōqithā (pipe), qīthros (kithara), sabbekā (? trigonal lower-chested

harp), and pṣantrīn ṣūmfonyāh (upper-chested ‘concord harp’).3

Although these were for the dedication of ‘an image of gold’, they

were, no doubt, for secular purposes also, if not primarily. Another

musical scene of Nebuchadnezzar’s time, although not Mesopo-

tamian, is pictured in Judith (iii. 8–10). It represents the Assyrian

general Holophenes in his murderous descent upon Syria, where the

petty kings and their people, to appease the invader, receive him

with ‘crowns, illuminations, and dancing to drums (tympana) and

reed-pipes (tibiae)’.

Mesopotamian court minstrelsy, even in later Achaemenid days,

was usually conceived on a grandiose scale. With the Assyrians the

position of the court minstrel was a high one, as his apparel and

situation often denote. His place was among the seniores priores,

taking precedence of the savants, coming immediately after gods and

kings.4 It may be recalled that it was a court minstrel who warned the

Median king Astyages (d. 550 B.C.) of the aims of Cyrus (d. 528 B.C.).5

Crowds of singing-girls usually graced the palaces at this period, as

Xenophon testifies.6 Yet ‘Darius the Mede’ (c. 521–485), when he had

cast Daniel into the den of lions, was sore distressed and passed the

night badly, ‘neither were instruments of musick brought before him’

(Daniel, vi. 18). The singing-girls were the later Arabian qaināt, a

term used to denote both female musicians and attendants, and the

cognate Akkadian word, kināti (female attendants), had probably the

other meaning also. The Greek historian Ctesias, who was physician

1 M. Jastrow, Aspects of Religious Belief and Practice in Babylonia and Assyria (New

York, 1911), pl. 13.

2 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 3.

3 See infra, pp. 245–6.

4 Schrader, op. cit. vi, pp. 72–73, 386.

5 Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, xiv. 633.

6 Cyropaedia, iv. 6, 11; v. i, 1; v. 5, 2, and 39.

Page 282

to Artaxerxes II (404-358 B.C.), tells us that one of the Babylonian

king's lieutenants had 150 of these female singers at his table,1 and

we know that when Parmenio, the Greek general, reduced Damascus,

he took 329 of these singing-girls from the court of Darius III

(d. 330 B.C.).2 Quintus Curtius (v. 1) has described the triumphal entry

of Alexander the Great into Babylon, where he was met by a pro-

cession of priests (magi) chanting hymns, followed by Chaldaean

diviners and astrologers, and musicians with string instruments,

'whose office it was to sing to their king'.

What secular music sounded like in Mesopotamia in those days we

know no more than we do of the actual music of the temples. As with

the latter, we only know of the media. Langdon has given some re-

markable lists of song titles of purely secular import, although some

may have been used in the temples.3 Among these are workers' and

shepherds' songs, youth songs and love ballads, the initial words of

which reveal lofty thoughts and passages deeply moving.

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

Of the instruments of music in ancient Mesopotamia we possess a

fair store of knowledge through the existence of actual specimens and

a multitude of delineations, although much perplexity lies in their

names, of which both the Sumerian and Akkadian languages offer

quite an assemblage. Among idiophones we possess actual specimens

of clappers from Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.).4 These consist of a

pair of copper blades. Other specimens were found at Kish.5 We also

have them depicted in the art remains,6 although we do not know

their names. Sistra were also discovered at Ur, but all that remains

are the jingling plates.7 Yet we know the complete form from art

sources.8 At a late period (c. 600 B.C.) we have a bell from Assyria,9

and sonnettes from the same place and period.10 Cymbals occur in two

kinds: the plate type, pictured on a Babylonian plaque(?c. 1100 B.C.),11

and a cup type of late Assyrian times (eighth-seventh centuries B.C.).12

1 Athenaeus, xii. 530.

2 Ibid. xiii. 608.

3 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1921), pp. 169 ff.

4 Leonard Woolley, Ur Excavations, ii (London, 1934), pp. 126 ff.

5 Langdon, Excavations at Kish (London, 1925), pls. vi and xxxviii.

6 Woolley, op. cit., figs. 21 ff.

7 Ibid., pp. 260 ff.

8 W. H. Ward, Seal Cylinders of Western Asia, v (Washington, 1910), p. 5.

9 Jastrow, Bildermappe zur Religion Babylonien und Assyriens (Gießen, 1912), fig. 70.

10 A. H. Layard, Discoveries in the Ruins of Nineveh and Babylon (London, 1853),

p. 177; G. Loud and C. B. Altman, Khorsabad, ii (Chicago, 1938), pl. 60.

11 Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, fig. 2.

12 C. Engel, The Music of the Most Ancient Nations (London, 1870), p. 73.

Page 283

240

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

During the Greek, i.e. the Seleucid, period, we also find cymbalists in figurines.

1

Their name has not been revealed, but the Akkadian verb sanāqu (to push, press together) reminds us of the Arabic sanj, pl. ṣunūj (cymbals).

2

Both the texts and the art remains furnish names and delineations of membranophones. The Sumerian lilís (Akkadian lilissu) was definitely a kettledrum, and we have a precious description of its composite parts.

3

Evidence of a smaller type is quite positive in the Sumerian ub (Akkadian uppu) which equates with lilís.

4

What one may picture from the ideogram to be an hour-glass shaped drum was the Sumerian balag (Akkadian balaggu).

5

The temple instrument must have been reasonably large, but there were smaller types as such names as balag-tur (small balag) may indicate. Such an instrument exists in Susian art.

6

A grand-daughter of Narām-Sin (c. 2280 B.C.) played on a balag-dí,

7

which equates in Akkadian with timbūtu and corresponds with ṭabālu.

8

The former possibly survives in the Persian dunbaq, and the latter, certainly, in the Arabic ṭabl; whilst balaggu was handed down in the Aramaic palgah and the Syriac pelāggā. Two unidentified drums, held vertically and played at the waist, occur in late Assyrian art (eighth-seventh centuries B.C.).

9

Frame drums, ordinarily called tambourines, existed in many sizes. A monster frame drum is delineated on the stele of Ur-Nammu (c. 2070 B.C.), now at Philadelphia.

10

Slightly smaller examples exist in the art remains. One of the time of Gudea (c. 2200 B.C.) is at Paris,

11

whilst another, a Carchemish relief (c. 1050 B.C.), is in the British Museum.

12

It is believed to be the Sumerian alal (Akkadian alû).

13

A portable tambourine figures in a relief from Tell Halaf (third millennium B.C.),

14

and in other examples.

15

This may have been the

1

Statuette: British Museum (no. 91794).

2

H. G. Farmer, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1939), p. 626. Langdon's unidentified šiqaṭu (ibid. 1921, p. 180) may be a rattle (= Arabic, shaqshaq). Cf. Egyptian šeq = to strike.

3

Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, fig. 5, p. 65; Revue d'Assyriologie, xvi (1919), p. 145.

4

Beiträge zur Assyriologie, v (1906), p. 582; Revue d'Assyriologie, xxi (1924), p. 80; Farmer, Oriental Studies (London, 1953), p. 18.

5

Beiträge zur Assyriologie, v (1906), p. 581; Revue d'Assyriologie, xxv (1928), p. 155.

6

Revue d'Assyriologie, xvii (1920), p. 49.

7

F. Thureau-Dangin, Les Inscriptions de Sumer et d'Akkad (Paris, 1905), p. 237.

8

F. Thureau-Dangin, . . . La Huitième Campagne de Sargon (Paris, 1912), p. 26, line 159. Galpin suggests that the timbūtu may have been a friction drum.

9

C. Engel, op. cit., pp. 63 ff.

10

Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, fig. 6.

11

Kinsky, op. cit., p. 1, fig. 1.

12

Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, fig. 1.

13

Ibid., p. 6. Langdon (Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxii) says 'Kettledrum?'

14

M. F. von Oppenheim, Tell Halaf (London, 1933), pl. xxxviii.

15

Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, figs. 3, 5.

Page 284

PLATE VIII

MESOPOTAMIAN INSTRUMENTS

(a) Assyrians playing lower-chested harps (883-59 B.C.)

(b) Harp from Ur (25th century B.C.)

(c) The royal Elamite orchestra, showing upper and lower-chested harps, double reed-pipes, and drum (668-26 B.C.)

See pages 237-8

Page 286

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

241

Sumerian meși (Akkadian mazū, manzū),1 a term linked by Langdon

with the Sumerian adapa (Akkadian ? aṭapu)2 which Galpin considers

to have been a rectangular instrument3 having in mind, probably, the

Hebrew toph and the Arabic duff.

Woodwind instruments were the most important of the aero-

phones in Mesopotamia. In the Sumerian tig, tigi (Akkadian tīgū)

we have the vertical flute, the longer instrument being the gigid4

(Akkadian malilu). We also read of the Akkadian kanzabu,5 a name

phonetically reminiscent of the Arabic qaṣaba.6 A flute of archaic

times is featured on a Sumerian seal at the Louvre, Paris,7 whilst

there is also a bone instrument, a small whistle, from Tepe Gawra.8

There once existed a bone whistle from Nimrod which gave three

notes, but it has disappeared.9

Among reed-pipes and oboes10 there existed the Sumerian šem

(Akkadian halhallatu)11 which may have been an ordinary reed-pipe.

How far it differed from the malilu12 which, on one special occasion,

was made of lapis lazuli, we do not know, although this latter equates

with the Akkadian imbubu, a word common to all Semitic tongues.

Perhaps the instrument is figured in the conical-tubed oboe in Engel.13

A double cylindrical reed-pipe in metal is preserved at Philadelphia

from the Ur tombs (c. 2500 B.C.),14 but only one of the pipes is play-

able, giving four notes of the diatonic scale. The art remains also dis-

play examples of the double reed-pipe.15 We are without evidence of

its name but the ṣinnitu16 may refer to such an instrument, if it alludes

to an accompanying drone-pipe (Arabic ṭann, ṭanin).17 A Susian

figurine (c. 750 B.C.) seems to show a crooked double reed-pipe,18 and

1 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxxii.

2 Neither in Deimel nor in Muss-Arnolt is aṭapu given as a musical instrument.

3 Op. cit., p. 8. See also Journal asiatique, Jan.-Fév., 1909, p. 85.

4 Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxxiii.

5 F. Martin, Textes religieux (Paris, 1903), p. 196.

6 Farmer, A History of Arabian Music (London, 1929), p. 47.

7 F. Lajard, Introduction à l'étude du culte public et des mystères de Mithra (Paris,

1847), pl. xli, 5.

8 Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, lxiv (1936), p. 8.

9 C. Engel, op. cit., p. 76; Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1921), p. 180.

10 Galpin, op. cit., p. 16.

11 Ibid., loc. cit. Cf. Langdon, Babylonian Liturgies, p. xxxii.

12 Beiträge zur Assyriologie, v (1906), p. 566.

13 Op. cit., p. 77.

14 L. Woolley, Ur Excavations, i, pp. 258 ff.

15 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 3, figs. 1, 4.

16 F. Martin, op. cit., p. 196. Another instrument mentioned in this place is the

arkā[tu] which is not known.

17 Galpin suggests that the ṣinnitu is a two-stringed lute (= pandore). Op. cit., pp. 35,

18 J. de Morgan, Délégation en Perse (Paris, 1901), i, pl. viii, figs. 10, 14.

B 3608

R

Page 287

242

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

Galpin suggests1 that this is the pitu or pitū mentioned by Langdon.2

It is doubtful.

So far as horns and trumpets are concerned, we have but few

references and illustrations. An archaic Sumerian tablet found at Ur

(second millennium B.C.) seemingly describes a wooden horn called

in Akkadian pukku (Sumerian ellag).3 The Sumerian karan mentioned

by Galpin is not registered by Deimel who, by the way, says that the

pukku was a drum. Yet we know that several instruments of the pukku

and mikkū types were presented (c. 1380 B.C.) by the Mitanni ruler

under Dushratta to Amen-ḥotep III of Egypt.4 We observe a very short

trumpet in a religious scene on a Hittite relief from Carchemish

(c. 1050 B.C.).5 The long metal trumpet may possibly be identified

in the hands of the kneeling figure on the stele of Narām-Sin

(c. 2280 B.C.),6 but a shorter type occurs on a Hittite relief (first

millennium B.C.).7 In late Assyrian days a long type is clearly depicted

in two examples (eighth-seventh centuries B.C.), whilst an actual

fragment of one has been preserved.8

The chordophone group of Mesopotamian instruments reveals

types of the highest interest to musicologists. Perhaps the most re-

markable are of the harp and kithara family; the evolutionary stages

of the harp are particularly fascinating. In the lower-chested harp, the

generic name for which Galpin has supposed to be zagsal,9 we see

three distinct forms. In the first, found on a slab from Khafāja

(c. 2700 B.C.), now at Chicago, we have an upright portable instru-

ment, with a neck and sound-chest in one graduated piece.10 Similar

examples (c. 2600 and 2500 B.C.) are at Philadelphia.11 In all these we

can discern that this harp is of the progeny of the warrior’s bow. In

Sumerian the instrument was possibly called the ban or pan (bow),12

a name associated in this way, maybe, from time immemorial.13 We

do not know its later Semitic name in Mesopotamia, although its last

1 Op. cit., p. 19.

2 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1921), pp. 174, 191.

3 Revue d'Assyriologie, xxx (1933), pp. 138, 153. The word endured for millennia in

the Syriac pūqā‘ā (fragor, crepitus).

4 J. A. Knudtzon, Die El-Amarna Tafeln (Leipzig, 1908 et seq.), pp. 155 ff.

5 Galpin, op. cit., pl. iii, fig. 1.

6 Jastrow, Aspects of Religious Belief (New York, 1911), pl. 8.

7 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 1, fig. 4.

8 Engel, op. cit., pp. 61 ff.

9 Op cit., pp. 26 ff.

10 H. Frankfort, Sculptures of the Third Millennium B.C from Tell Asmar and Khafājah

(Chicago, 1939), pl. 107.

11 Galpin, pls. ii, fig. 4; v, fig. 5. Galpin’s name for it is mirītu.

12 Ibid., p. 28.

13 J. F. Rowbotham, A History of Music, i (London, 1885–7), p. 154.

Page 288

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

243

descendants were the Pahlavi vōn and the Arabic wān.1 The second

form, with a separate bow-shaped neck fixed to a horizontal sound-

chest, was not unlike the Burmese saun. It is delineated on a vase from

Bismaya (c. 3000 B.C.) at Stamboul,2 although there is an actual speci-

men from Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.) at the British Museum

(pl. 8 (b)).3 The instrument of the foremost player on the Bismaya vase

has only seven strings whilst the Ur instrument has eleven. The former

may relate to the šibītu (seven [stringed] harp),4 but no name has

come down for the latter instrument, although we seem to have

šiššatu (six [stringed]) and eširtu (ten [stringed]) as names of instru-

ments according Langdon.5 The third form, with a separate vertical

neck in the horizontal sound-chest, shows itself on a Nippur plaque

(c. 1800 B.C.), now at Philadelphia.6 It is also recognizable in the

hands of one of the Elamite musicians on the Kūl-i Fir‘aun sculp-

tures.7 In later Assyrian days (eighth-seventh centuries B.C.) we have

several examples in art remains.8 Owing to the reconstruction of a

fracture on the British Museum sculpture, where a joint cut through

one of the designs of this instrument, the newly imposed position of

the strings misled some musicographers to imagine a dulcimer9 or a

psaltery,10 instead of a harp.

The last-mentioned type of lower-chested harp gave rise to the

upper-chested harp, which was, to all intent, the previously described

instrument turned sideways. It has been identified with the Akkadian

zaggāl, a doubtful name which Galpin thought was the parent of the

Persian chang.11 This latter had an acutely angled upper sound-chest

with a distinct hump, and when we first espy it on a bronze vessel

from Nīhāwand (c. 2000 B.C.) this sound-chest is almost vertical but

with a sudden bend at the peak.12 We notice it also on a figurine from

1 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii (Glasgow, 1939), p. 74.

2 E. J. Banks, Bismaya (New York, 1912), p. 267.

3 L. Woolley, Ur Excavations, i, pp. 74 ff., ii, pls. 108–10. The British Museum’s

reconstruction of its sound-chest was definitely wrong. Even Galpin, with his encyclo-

paedic knowledge of the morphology of instruments, did not object to this faultily

conceived modelling when he reproduced the design in 1929 (Music and Letters, x,

pp. 108 ff.). In view of this the present writer made his own reconstruction in 1931, to

which Galpin agreed, and in 1933 both Galpin and Curt Sachs made representations to

the British Museum for the necessary alteration. However, Galpin remedied the design

in his monumental work of 1937.

4 F. Martin, Textes religieux (Paris, 1903), p. 196.

5 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1921), pp. 180, 183–4. The Hebrew nebel ‘āsōr

as its name tells us, had ten strings.

6 Galpin, op. cit., pl. vi, fig. 4.

7 J. de Morgan, op. cit. iii, pl. 23.

8 Engel, op. cit., p. 49.

9 Ibid., pp. 44 ff.; Rowbotham, op. cit. i, p. 335.

10 Virolleaud et Pélagaud, op. cit., p. 46.

11 Op. cit., pp. 29, 56.

12 E. Herzfeld, Archaeological History of Iran (London, 1935), p. 7. See also Revue

d’Assyriologie, xxv (1928), pp. 169, 175, fig. 1.

Page 289

244

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

Sippar (c. 1700 B.C.) now at Philadelphia.1 In later Assyrian scenes the chest has a graduated curve throughout its length.2 The same is to be seen in Elamite designs.3

The kithara family reveals some unique specimens. In late Assyrian times (eighth-seventh century B.C.), one delineated example is a folk instrument.4 It is of asymmetrical construction, an outline which is maintained in the instruments of professionals.5 A rectangular type occurs on the Tell Halaf relief (third millennium B.C.),6 and in As-syrian art remains (eighth-seventh centuries B.C.).7 Its name is not as yet known to us. The most outstanding instrument of this class was the grand kithara, seemingly known in Sumerian as algar.8 Langdon said that algar was merely a longer form of the mythical instrument called al, which is the subject of an Enlil psalm,9 but Galpin insisted that it is the al and the zagsal that are identical. This grand kithara is depicted on the standard of Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.),10 and on seals of the same period.11 A slightly larger example is limned on the Tello relief (c. 2200 B.C.),12 whilst the plaque from Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.) is almost the height of a man.13 Even these representations, expressive though they may be, are not comparable with the actual instruments from Ur (twenty-fifth century B.C.) which are preserved in splendid examples at the British Museum, Baghdad, and Philadelphia.14

Our final section concerns the pandore. The Sumerian word pan or ban stood for ‘bow’, and later perhaps for ‘harp’ also. If the curved neck of the lower-chested harp were straightened, quite a different

1 V. Scheil, Une Saison de fouilles à Sippar (Cairo, 1902), p. 90, fig. 2; Galpin, op. cit., pl. vi, fig. 6.

2 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 3, figs. 1, 3.

3 J. de Morgan, op. cit., iii, pl. 23. The Arabs of the East and the Moors of Spain appear to have been the last to use this harp (jank, Persian chang). See Farmer, The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights (Bearsden, 1945), pls. 4, 5; J. F. Riaño, Notes on Early Spanish Music (London, 1887), p. 122.

4 Engel, op. cit., p. 39, fig. 7.

5 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 2, fig. 3; p. 3, figs. 2, 3.

6 M. F. von Oppenheim, op. cit., pl. xxxviii.

7 Engel, op. cit., p. 38, fig. 5.

8 Galpin, op. cit., pp. 31 ff. In April 1937 I suggested to the late Dr. Langdon that the Akkadian qatāru (to strike) or kasāru (to gather together, tie, hence kiṣru, something tied) might have produced the name of such an instrument, hence κιθápa. In reply he informed me that the former word was now known to mean only ‘to smoke’, but gave no opinion about the latter. Cf. kassar and kasrā, the lyre in modern Upper Egypt.

9 Sumerian Liturgical Texts (Philadelphia, 1917), p. 187.

10 Galpin, op. cit., frontispiece, p. 31.

11 Ibid., pl. ii, figs. 1, 3, 5.

12 Heuzey and de Sarzec, Découvertes en Chaldée (Paris, 1884), pl. 23.

13 Woolley, op. cit. ii, pl. 105, 111–14, 118–21.

14 Galpin, op. cit., pl. vii.

Page 290

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

245

instrument would be created, as I have shown elsewhere.1 This change

would produce the Sumerian pantur (small pan), as both Galpin and

Sachs suggest,2 a name which easily could have been the parent of the

Greek pandoura. Julius Pollux said that while the Arabs invented the

one-stringed instrument, the Assyrians were responsible for the pan-

doura of three strings.3 We see an early pandore on a plaque from

Nippur (c. 1700 B.C.),4 as well as in later designs.5 In Assyrian times

(eighth-seventh centuries B.C.) it is also featured.6 Was this the nebel

which Isaiah wished to silence in his denunciation of Babylon (Isaiah

xiv. 11)?

There is still that list of instruments of the ‘Golden City’ of

Babylon as recorded in Daniel (iii. 5, 7, 10, 15) to be discussed. With

one exception—the last-named—they are Semitic by name and origin.

The Aramaic qarnā (horn) needs no comment, since we have seen its

Akkadian parent. The root of the Syriac mašrōqīthā (pipe), which is

šāraq, is as old as Judges (v. 16), where it more properly refers to the

sounds of the shepherd’s pipe, an instrument called šarqōqīthā in

Talmudic times. The Syriac lexicographers tells us that the mašruqitho

is the Arabic ṣaffāra (recorder), shabāba (flute), or ṣūr (horn). Of the

qīthros (kithara) we have already spoken. The sabbekā (lower-chested

harp) owes its name, in all probability, to the fact that multiplicity

[of strings] was confused with multiflexity, as we see in the root

sābaq (to intertwine, interweave), hence sebāq (lattice-work) and

sebāqā (net-work), whose kindred still thrive in Arabic. The pṣantrīn

ṣūmfonyāh (concard harp), reopens an old controversy about the

ṣūmfonyāh being a separate instrument, to wit, a bagpipe or some

other instrument, in spite of St. Jerome’s early rejection of such a

notion7 as pointed out by Pusey.8 Since the time of the latter there has

been a change of heart, and several attempts have been made to

solve the problem, notably in the more recent interpretation by

1 Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, v (1930), p. 26.

2 Galpin, op. cit., p. 35; Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940),

p. 82.

3 Onomasticon, iv. 60.

4 Galpin, op. cit., pl. viii, fig. 6.

5 Ibid., pl. viii, fig. 7; Kinisky, op. cit., p. 2, fig. 1; J. Garstang, The Hittite Empire

(London, 1929), pl. xxx. In this last, a Hittite example, we see incurvatures in the waist

of the sound-chest, the parent of the modern guitar.

6 Engel, op. cit., pp. 54 ff., figs. 12, 23. See A. W. Pope, A Survey of Persian Art, iv

(London, 1938) for pandores from Luristan, p. 72, and Susa, p. 74; M. Ebert, Reallexi-

kon der Vorgeschichte (Berlin, 1926), vi, p. 216; Farmer, Oriental Studies: Mainly

Musical (London, 1953,) pp. 61 ff.

7 The ṣūmfonyāh is also omitted from the list of Daniel iii in the pseudo-graphic Letter

to Dardanus: Patrologiae Latinae, xxx, p. 221.

8 The Book of Daniel (London, 1864), pp. 24 ff. In two verses ṣūmfonyāh and ṣifonyā

occur as separate instruments since they are preceded by the conjunctive vav (‘and’).

Page 291

246

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

Galpin.1 In the above, however, a different solution is offered. The

pṣantrīn (= psalterion) was, according to St. Augustine, an upper-

chested harp. Its wide gamut, twenty strings, perhaps, may have led

to it being termed symphonious, in the sense that it could be played

in octaves. Because of that the word sūmfonyāh is used as a noun in

apposition to pṣantrīn, just as in nebel ‘āsōr (decacord harp) in Psalms

(xxxiii, xcii).

Thus we see that for 3,000 years before the Christian era at least,

ancient Mesopotamia had instruments of music, not only of a most

varied character, but of a very high and advanced degree of construc-

tion, as the harps and kitharas of Sumerian days alone eloquently

testify. Yet although we have so many instruments, and even more

names of instruments than we can identify by form or even class, we

must ever be cautious in accepting identification except with the

greatest latitude.

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MUSIC

With the growth of the temple organization, the earlier animistic

beliefs in the potency of music had given way to more scientific ideas.

The marvels of the heavens became a greater source of wonderment,

and this led to the deification of the planets as man's protectors.

Astrology induced mathematics, and since we find that the very gods

were subjected to the exact sciences, we can be fairly certain that

music also fell under their dominion. Of the attainments of the

Mesopotamian peoples in astronomy and mathematics we have ample

knowledge from indigenous sources. Of the theory of music, however,

nothing on the subject has been unearthed, save what we know from

Greek writers. From the latter we learn that the fame of Babylon for

mathematical and occult accomplishments had spread to the western

world, an esteem which was the means of attracting scholars to the

Mesopotamian centres of learning. According to Iamblichus2 and

Diogenes Laertius,3 one of those so allured was Pythagoras. From

Valerius Maximus4 we know that he also learned there the motion of

the stars, their intrinsic properties, and their effect and influence on

mankind. These beliefs seem to have had their origin in Mesopotamia.

Quite early we find the peoples of the ‘fertile crescent’ in the

possession of an elaborate cosmic system in which there existed a

1 Op. cit., pp. 67 ff.; Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), pp.

83 ff.

2 De vita Pythagorae, iv, p. 3.

3 Lives of Eminent Philosophers, viii (London, 1925), p. 3.

4 Facta et dicta, vii, p. 7.

Page 292

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MUSIC

247

spiritual inter-relation between the entire macrocosm and microcosm,

a belief which gave birth to tenets which were known later as the

'harmony of the spheres', the 'doctrine of the ethos', and the 'theory

of numbers'. Censorinus says that Pythagoras taught that the universe

was constructed according to musical ratio, and that the seven

planets, revolving in the heavens, emitted sounds so consonant as

to produce the most exquisite music.1 One wonders whether the

Mesopotamian kalū or precentor petitioned those 'Lords of the

Heavens', as they called the planets, through their appropriate musi-

cal ratios.2 The teachings of Pythagoras concerning the principles of

the ethos have almost a Mesopotamian flavour, in that music, being

a cosmic ingredient, possessed qualities and sensibilities which could

evoke the like if the appropriate and related kind of music were used.

Thus one species would banish depression, another would assuage

grief, a third would check passion, while yet another would dispel

fear. Although both the above beliefs were connected with the theory

of music in a vague way, trust in the efficacy of the 'theory of num-

bers' was an integral part of the theory of music. In Mesopotamia,

number was something more than a mathematical unit; it was be-

lieved that number in itself possessed an active force, having proper-

ties that were sacred attributes.3 Philo Judaeus writes that 'the law

of the Chaldaeans, taken symbolically, is mathematical speculation',4

and he saw that these people, by availing themselves of the principles

of music, had imagined the most perfect harmony existing throughout

the universe.5 In this cosmic scheme some numbers had greater

efficacy than others, and the numbers seven and four were among

these.6 Nature herself had made both sacrosanct. The potency of

seven could be seen in the planetary system, while its sum was ap-

parent in the quadrangle plus the triangle, both of which were used

in the auguries. Philo Judaeus appreciated that seven had four

boundaries and three interval ratios, i.e. 1:2, 2:3, and 3:4.7 Is it any

wonder that the heptatonic scale was formulated, linked as it was

with the planetary system which interpreted the will of the gods?8

On the practical side of music our knowledge is equally sparse.

Both the late Francis W. Galpin and Curt Sachs have provided

1 De Dei nat., p. xiii.

2 Cf. J. Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy (London, 1930), pp. 87 ff. and Chap. IX

p. 341.

3 F. Cumont, Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans (New York,

1912), pp. 29 ff.

4 Works, iv (London, 1854), p. 404.

5 Ibid. ii, p. 82.

6 L. W. King, A History of Babylon (London, 1915), p. 307.

7 Op. cit. i, p. 30.

8 Diodorus Siculus, ii, 30,

Page 293

248

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

lengthy discussions on the subject, although much of the probing must necessarily be in the land of conjecture. The great enticement to all investigators has been the existence of instruments, either actual or delineated, from ancient days, which have acted as lodestones to the inquisitive. Yet no matter how sedulously we count the cords of stringed instruments, the answer to the computation is always a number, not a gamut. It is true that we possess a real Mesopotamian wind instrument or two, but they are palpably insufficient for our purpose.

On the other hand, both Galpin and Sachs have contrived to elucidate the Mesopotamian scale by other means. The former, under the impulsion of Landsberger,1 imagined a scale of three octaves, being urged to these dimensions by an endeavour to embrace a supposed ‘ordered arrangement’ of the Semitic alphabet of twenty-one letters into a scale which is said to have been used at the ‘opening centuries of the second millennium B.C.’2 It must be pointed out that there is neither an instrument, nor a delineation of an instrument, from this region and period, which carries so great a number of strings. Incidentally, in this worthy attempt to solve the so-called musical notation on certain cuneiform tablets, to be dealt with presently, Galpin registers his conviction that he could find ‘no trace of harmony’ in this sole exemplar of Mesopotamian music, although such an opinion is obviously conditioned by his own interpretation of the cuneiform signs. It may be stated that others have held opposite views, notably Langdon whose argument was that since there were female as well as male choristers in the temples they must have chanted in four parts, a quite unwarranted assumption.3

Curt Sachs has also stated that harmony was used in Mesopotamian music. He bases his deductions on a series of studies which began in 1923,4 were continued in 1929,5 and were reaffirmed in 1933,6 1940,7 and 1943.8 From these he concluded that ‘consonant chords’ were used, i.e. harmony in the accepted sense of the word. Taking the Elamo-Assyrian harpers depicted on the British Museum bas-reliefs, and examining their technique in plucking the individual strings, he

1 Festschrift Max von Oppenheim, Archiv für Orientforschung, i (Berlin, 1933).

2 Galpin, op. cit., pp. 38 ff., 99 ff.

3 Babylonian Liturgies, p. xi.

4 Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, xviii (1924), pp. 120-3; Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, vii (1925), p. 1.

5 Festschrift für Johannes Wolf (Berlin, 1929), pp. 168 ff.

6 Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache, lxix (1933), pp. 68 ff.

7 The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), p. 82.

8 The Rise of Music in the Ancient World (New York, 1943), pp. 99-101.

Page 294

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MUSIC

249

pursued quite an ingenious line of inquiry. From this he believed that

the position of the hands and fingers of the harpers showed that

'chords' were played. To the present writer it seems that any attempt

to determine, from this bas-relief, which strings are plucked, can be

no more than a gratuitous assumption. Sachs supposes that 'each

harper plucks two strings' simultaneously. Yet might not one just as

readily assume that each harper is plucking one string with one hand,

and is preparing to pluck another string with the other hand? Sachs

also touches upon scalar theories, and states categorically that there

existed in Mesopotamia 'almost certainly a pentatonic tuning', al-

though 'singing', he says, 'at least in the last one thousand years B.C.,

was heptatonic without any trace of pentatonism'. These theses are

palpably dependent upon his own interpretation of the harpers'

technique and on his reading of the cuneiform scale. Eighty years

earlier the musicologist Carl Engel also held to the pentatonic

scale theory,1 and Langdon, admittedly a non-musician, followed

suit.2

NOTATION

Did Mesopotamia possess a musical notation? When texts and

translations of certain cuneiform tablets at Berlin were published by

George Reisner in 1896,3 they were claimed to reveal a musical nota-

tion, a pronouncement which created considerable stir in both the

archaeological and musicological worlds. These finds dated from

about 800 B.C., although others were discovered later from the six-

teenth century B.C. The claims for a notation were based on certain

vocalic characters, as well as ideograms, contained in the texts, and

Theophilus G. Pinches thought that since the former occurred at the

beginning, in the middle (the caesura), and at the end of a line, rather

than over words, they represented 'tonalities' rather than 'notes', a

judgement which was quite sound.4 In 1919, when Erich Ebeling

published such texts,5 fresh interest accrued, and in 1923 Curt Sachs

worked at a musical transcription of the 'notation'.6 Benno Lands-

berger repudiated Sachs's transcription,7 and the latter has since ad-

mitted that his initial attempt was a failure.8 In 1937 Galpin published

1 Op. cit., p. 122.

2 Babylonian Liturgies, p. lii.

3 Sumerisch-babylonische Hymnen (Leipzig, 1896).

4 Hastings' Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, ix (Edinburgh, 1917), p. 14.

5 Keilschrifttexte aus Assur religiösen Inhalts, i (Leipzig, 1919), p. 4.

6 Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, xviii (1924), pp. 120 ff.

7 Festschrift für Max von Oppenheim: Archiv für Orientforschung (Berlin, 1933), p. 170.

8 The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, p. 86.

Page 295

250

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

his noteworthy study of Sumerian music, in which he rebuffed Lands-

berger’s pessimism regarding a solution, but he too rejected Sachs’s

transcription.1 We have already dealt with Galpin’s proposed scale

of twenty-one notes.2 Sachs, in turn, declined acceptance of Galpin’s

scheme, and again set out, but with fresh premises, to solve anew the

cryptic signs. The results were published in an article entitled ‘The

Mystery of the Babylonian Notation’ which appeared in 1941.3

THE HERITAGE

The influence exerted by Mesopotamian culture on the western

world was far reaching.4 Unfortunately the glories of the intellectual

and artistic conquests of Greece have dazzled the view of our cultural

debts to others. Not that the Greeks are responsible for this obscurity.

On the contrary, both they and the Romans acknowledged their

indebtedness to the Orient. Strabo says that ‘the cultivators of ancient

music are said to be Thracians’, and that ‘from its melody, rhythm,

and instruments, all Thracian music is supposed to be Asiatic’.5 The

legend of Orpheus, the ‘Father of Songs’, is pre-eminently a Thracian

one. It is admitted that it was through Asia Minor that Thrace re-

ceived these Oriental refinements. The two semi-mythical originators

of flutes and reed-pipes, Hyagnis and Marsyas, were both Phrygians.6

Terpander, the accredited systematizer of Greek music in the intro-

duction of nomoi for the lyre, and Olympus, the founder of the

Phrygian school of music, who introduced nomoi for the woodwind

(auloi), were also from these parts. What was the nomos? Could it

have been a survival of the old Semitic neum or ‘[intoned] utterance

of soothsayer and prophet’? Indeed the shades of Babylon, ‘learned

and wise’, may be discerned over the shoulders of many of these

reputed founders of the arts and sciences in Greece, mythical though

they may be. Pseudo-Euclid, i.e. Cleonides, makes Terpander say that

the lyre had four strings until he made them seven,7 which Strabo

seems to confirm.8 Whence did this inspiration come? Could it have

been Babylon? If we can trust pseudo-Plutarch9 it would appear

that the Greeks at this time were most conservative in musical

matters. Boëthius says that it was the seven planets which suggested

1 The Music of the Sumerians (Cambridge, 1937), pp. 38 ff.

2 See supra, p. 248.

3 The Musical Quarterly, xxvii (1941), pp. 62 ff.

4 L. W. King, A History of Sumer and Akkad (London, 1910), pp. 321 ff.; A History

of Babylon (London, 1915), pp. 289 ff.

5 The Geography, x. iii. 17.

6 ps.-Plutarch, De musica, v-viii.

7 iii. 67.

8 xiii. ii. 4.

9 De musica, iii. xviii.

Page 296

THE HERITAGE

251

this number of strings to Terpander,1 a statement which agrees with a Mesopotamian origin.

Diodorus Siculus tells us that it was Linus who gave verse and music to the Greeks,2 and the Linus myth in Greece, which represents this god as a musician and the creator of the Linus song, is simply the older Mesopotamian legend of Tammuz. Euripides judged the cry αἰλıνος in the mournful Linus songs to be a Phrygian custom, and indeed we see its fellow in the Hebrew ai lānū, the like of which we find at the close of some of the psalms. Frazer identifies Linus with Adonis,3 as did Pausanias,4 and the Phoenicians called the latter Gingras, a name which was actually given to the wailing reed-pipe, as Xenophon and Aristoxenus relate.5 Curiously enough, Adonis was worshipped in Asia Minor under the name of Abobas,6 a word strikingly reminiscent of the Syriac abūba, which was the Akkadian imbubu.

Instruments of music found their way into Greece from the Orient in great numbers. Strabo says: ‘And those writers who have consecrated the whole of Asia, as far as India,7 to Dionysus, derive the greater part of music from there. One writer says: “ striking the asias kithara”; another calls pipes “Berecyintian” and “Phrygian”, and some of the instruments have been called by barbarian names, nabla, sambykē, barbitos, magadis, and several others.’8 Some of these others are quoted by Athenaeus, and among them the pectis and phenix (phoinix).9 The word kithara may not be Greek.10 That it was sometimes called asias,11 rather than asias kithara, is worthy of notice. It is more than strange that ‘to play’ upon the kithara is conveyed by the word κρέκω, and practically the same word, haraka, has been used in Arabic from time immemorial in connexion with playing the lute (‘ūd),12 a term which, in its pristine form, means ‘to hasten’, as does the cognate Akkadian araḫu.

1 De musica, i. 20. See Bibliothèque archéologique et historique, xxx (1939), pp. 161 ff.

2 Bibliotheca Historica, III. 67. See also p. 378.

3 The Golden Bough, ii (London, 1900), pp. 224, 253.

4 ix. 29.

5 Athenaeus, op. cit. iv, pp. 174 ff., who said that the gingras was Phoenician.

6 Hesychius, s.v.

7 Strabo, op. cit., x. iii. 17.

8 That the term ‘India’ meant eastern countries much nearer, see the Cosmographia Ethici (p. 28) with the additions by Julius Honorius (p. 7). Even the ecclesiastical historians call the Arabs ‘Indians’.

9 iv. 175–85.

10 ps.-Plutarch, op. cit. 6. Euripides, Cyclops, v. 443. The Trojans used the kithara whereas the Greeks had the phorminx.

11 C. Daremberg et E. Saglio, Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines (Paris. 1877 et seq.), p. 1438.

12 Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, xi (1946), p. 29.

Page 297

252

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

The nabla, as its name (Hebrew nebel) indicates, has a distinct Semitic physiognomy. Indeed it was called the Sidonian nabla, which particularly identifies it with Phoenicia. It was known quite early in Greece, since Sophocles (d. c. 406 B.C.) speaks of it, as does Ovid (d. A.D. c. 17 in Rome). For the trigōnon and/or sambykē a Syrian origin is claimed and in Rome it was the sambuca which was found in the hands of Syrians in the time of Hadrian (d. A.D. 38). Of course, we recognize this harp immediately in the Aramaic ṣabbekā which we read about in Daniel (iii). The barbitos (cf. the Persian barbat) is attributed to Terpander, and both Sappho of Lesbos (7th cent. B.C.) and Ovid in Rome sang its praises. The magadis is acknowledged to be of Lydian origin, as also the pectis, while Lydian reed-pipes (auloi and tibiae) were lauded by both Pindar (d. 438 B.C.) and Horace (d. 8 B.C.). Indeed it is the latter who tells us about Oriental female reed-pipers in Rome. They were the Syrian ambubiae mentioned by Papias, and their name reveals that they played the Akkadian reed-pipe imbubu, in spite of the Syriac equivalent being abbūba. As early as Terence (d. c. 159 B.C.) Roman orchestras had players on the tibiae sarranae, i.e. the Phoenician reed-pipes. One of the Phrygian auloi of the double reed-pipe group was the elymos, the drone-pipe of which was turned up with a horn ‘bell’, hence, probably, its name. This was the type of Akkadian pipe which Galpin wanted to identify in the pītu. Yet whether it was Phoenicia or Syria, Lydia or Phrygia, that were dubbed the ‘inventors’ of these instruments, the fons et origo was Mesopotamia.

Perhaps the most marked impinging of Mesopotamian musical culture on Greece is discernible in Pythagorean traditions. Pythagoras himself is claimed by both Greek1 and Persian2 writers to have been a Syrian born, one making Tyre, and the other Sidon his birthplace. Instructed at first by Sidonian and Phoenician hierophants, he was initiated into the mysteries of Tyre and Byblos. Later he passed into Egypt, where he remained twenty-one years. Taken captive by Cambyses, he was carried to Babylon where, says Iamblichus, he was instructed by the priests ‘in their venerable knowledge, and learned from them the most perfect worship of the gods. Through their assistance likewise, he arrived at the summit of arithmetic, [the theory of] music, and other disciplines.’3 After twelve years at Babylon he settled at Samos, where, because of his learning, he was immediately dubbed a sophos (Akkadian āšipu).

1 Porphyry, De vita Pythagorae, i.

2 Mīr Khāwand, Raudat al-Ṣafā’, i. ii (London, 1891–4), p. 268.

3 Iamblichus, De vita Pythagorae, iv.

Page 298

THE HERITAGE

253

It was through Pythagoras and his disciples that Greece became

acquainted with such doctrines as the 'harmony of the spheres', the

'principles of the ethos', and that alluring theory of the 'efficacy of

numbers', which have already been described. It is true that he has

been credited as the first to determine the consonances of the fourth,

fifth, and octave, but the inherently false accounts of this so-called 'dis-

covery', as preserved by Nicomachus,1 Gaudentius,2 and Boethius,3

reveal the improbability of this.4 There is no reason why the peoples

of Mesopotamia who made so creditable an advance in arithmetical

and geometrical progressions, and who possessed rules for finding the

areas of squares, rectangles, right triangles, and trapezoids, could not

have had as complete a knowledge of the speculative theory of music

as the earliest of the Greek theorists, Pythagoras.

Plutarch, in his commentary on the Timaeus of Plato, informs us

that the Chaldaeans connected musical intervals with the seasons,

i.e. the fourth (3:4) = Autumn, the fifth (2:3) = Winter, the octave

(1:2) = Summer, whilst the tonic (1:1) = Spring.5 This was a corner-

stone in the doctrine of the ethos. Actually, it is the most useful

reference by the Greeks to the Mesopotamian theory of music that

we possess apart from the Pythagorean passages, although we must

not forget the statement of Nicomachus, that Iamblichus had testified

that it was the people of Babylonia who discovered the harmonic

proportion which Pythagoras introduced into Greece.6 It seems there-

fore not unlikely that Mesopotamia possessed a theory of music

which was actually the starting-point of our present system.

That the peoples of the Mesopotamian plains were the pioneers of

civilization, and that they contributed remarkably to the progress of

music, must be allowed them. The mere comparison between the

advanced structure of Mesopotamian instruments of music, especially

in their harps and citharas, with what the Greeks had accomplished,

at once proclaims the immense superiority of the former. Although

the peoples of Mesopotamia never exerted a permanent hegemony

over the lands of the western Mediterranean, their culture dominated

Syrian, Phoenician, and Hittite lands, from whence it infiltrated into

Greece and Egypt, to become the seed for the intellectual develop-

ment of the West.

1 Meibom, Antiquae musicae auctores septem (Amsterdam, 1652), pp. 10 ff.

2 Ibid., p. 13.

3 De musica, i. 10.

4 Farmer, Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence (London, 1930), p. 292.

5 De animae procr. 31.

6 Intro. Arith. xxvi, xxix.

Page 299

254

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA

In the sphere of religion we can dimly recognize the germ of our own religious practices, not merely in the liturgy, the penitential psalm, the antiphon, the precentor, the incense, and the rest, but in the mater dolorosa. As Langdon says, one cannot doubt the great influence of the Mesopotamian temples upon the late Jewish Church and upon Christianity.1 One recalls that the Mesopotamian kalū or temple precentor had to be skilled in an eight-day liturgy,2 each day of which would have had its appropriate ‘trope’ or ‘tone’. Does not the Hebrew sheminīth in the captions of the psalms refer to an eighth mode, as Isaac ben Abraham ibn Latif (13th cent.) avers? Could that practice have been the reason for the Syriac ikhadias of the Jacobite Church, the octoēchos of the Byzantine Church, and the eight Gregorian tones of the Roman Church? Although the Prophet cries ‘Babylon is fallen, fallen’, the plainchant of the Roman Church today carries the titles Primus gravis, Secundus tristis, and Tertius mysticus, which are but ethoidal relics from the ancient Mesopotamian past of probably 6,000 years ago.

1 Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms, p. 238.

2 Langdon, Journal: American Oriental Society, xliii (1925-6), p. 112.

Page 300

VI

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

By Henry George Farmer

INTRODUCTION

WHEN we approach the history of ancient Egypt we are confronted with a highly developed social and cultural melioration which is already a fait accompli. The previous chapter has described a similar circumstance in Mesopotamia. Yet, as in that land of the 'two rivers', we do not know why, how, or when this surpassing achievement came about. Modern research has revealed abundant proof of the impingement of a 'new culture' in Egypt during the early dynasties—that is, from about the twenty-ninth century B.C.—not unlike that of Mesopotamia and Iran. How far this affected instruments of music is not at present as discernible as it is in other spheres, for the cultural impact must have taken place long before the twenty-fifth century B.C., the date of the Royal Tombs of Ur. Indeed the harps of the 4th dynasty (twenty-sixth century B.C.) delineated at Gizeh reveal a stage of instrumental construction earlier than that of Sumer and Akkad in the twenty-fifth century B.C. This seems to show that whatever initial promptings may have come through Mesopotamian or Iranian migrations, or subsequent influences from these sources, the cultural contacts with the East must have ceased meanwhile.

As in Mesopotamia, we are denied precise dates in the earlier periods; those used in this chapter, like those in the previous one, are based on the readjustments of Professor W. F. Albright,1 which have brought us very near to what Sir John G. Wilkinson had guessed more than a century before.2

Fifth Millennium B.C.

Prehistoric period

Fourth Millennium B.C.

Predynastic period

1 Bulletin of the American Schools or Oriental Research, nos. 77, 78 (1940), and 88 (1942).

2 J. G. Wilkinson, The Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians, i (London, 1837), pp. 41 ff.

Page 301

256

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

Third Millennium B.C.

Dynasty I . . . . . Twenty-ninth century

Dynasty IV . . . . . Twenty-sixth century

Dynasty VII . . . . . Twenty-second century

Second Millennium B.C.

Dynasty XII . . . . . c. 1989

Dynasty XIII . . . . . c. 1776

Dynasty XVIII . . . . . c. 1570

Dynasty XX . . . . . c. 1200

First Millennium B.C.

Dynasty XXI (Tanis) . . . . c. 1090

Dynasty XXII (Libyan) . . . . c. 945

Dynasty XXVI (Saite) . . . . c. 664

Dynasty XXVII (Persian invasion) . . c. 525

Greek period . . . . . 332

Roman period . . . . . 30

PRIMITIVE MUSICAL SURVIVALS1

It is not improbable that music, or at least sound, stood at the cradle of all religion. Animism certainly had its origin in sound, for when primitive man struck a piece of wood, stone, or skin, or blew into a tube or cavity, and contemplated the resultant sound, he naturally concluded that what he heard was the ‘voice’ of the object struck, or of that into which he blew. He therefore assumed that by awakening their ‘voices’ he could propitiate unseen nature of which they were all a part. We see this in our first glimpse of Egyptian instruments of music.

Man’s earliest instruments were idiophones, and we find them in ancient Egypt. These were clappers, and they are figured in pairs on predynastic pottery (fourth millennium B.C.).2 Clappers also occur on monuments of the 5th dynasty (twenty-fourth century B.C.) where they were used for animistic purposes. In one instance we seem to see the god of the harvest, Min, being conjured by means of clappers to make fruitful the toil of vintagers.3 In another example, harvesters

1 In transliterating Egyptian words the conventional system has been adopted with the following exceptions: ḥ = ‘a’: ḫ = ‘a: ṯ = t. The use of the vowel e between the consonants is quite arbitrary, and has been introduced, together with the above modifications, solely for the convenience of the general reader.

2 D. Randall-MacIver and C. Mace, El Amra and Abydos (London, 1902), pl. xiv.

3 R. Lepsius, Denkmäler: Ergänzungsband (Leipzig, 1913), pl. xxi.

Page 302

PRIMITIVE MUSICAL SURVIVALS

257

perform a dance of appeasement to Ia’ru the god of the reeds, or to

Nepri the corn spirit, perhaps, to the accompaniment of clashing

sticks.1 The application of like to like in this fashion is patent magic,

rhythmical application still more so, for man saw measured motion

in nature itself. This is precisely what Plutarch detected in the four

jingling metal bars on the sistrum, presumably linked with the four

elements, which immediately became active forces because, he says,

‘all things are subject to motion’.2

Plutarch has also handed down a pretty conceit of Egypt’s archaic

musical past. Before the days of Menes, its first king, Egypt was ruled

by gods, and one of these, Osiris, was responsible for teaching the

world the arts of civilization. What enabled him to accomplish this

was his ‘persuasive discourse, combined with song, and all manner

of music’.3 (That gods were ever musically inclined is, of course, a

universal tale.) Osiris was the ‘Lord of the sistrum’, an instrument

specially dedicated to the goddess Hathor, the later Isis. The dwarf

god Bes was supposed to be the ‘god of music and dancing’, and in

art remains he is delineated with either the harp or kithara in hand,4

while ‘singing gods’ and ‘dancing gods’ were innumerable in the

Duat or land of the dead. Indeed there were ‘choirs of angels’ in the

latter abode. Thoth was presumed to be the ‘god of knowledge and

wisdom’, but as Hermes Trismegistus he was the ‘inventor of music’5

and the author of books of chants to the gods.6 Indeed there is no

end to the legends of the harmonious attributes of Egypt’s deities.

That many of the gods were of totemistic origin is generally con-

ceded.7 When we discern birds, animals, and reptiles figured on in-

struments of music, or playing them, let us not attribute the circum-

stance to aesthetic fancy alone; it was due to a much more hallowed

incitement. In the Book of the Dead the animal world, with man, laud

god together, and Maspero has referred to predynastic chants or

songs to animals.8 As in Mesopotamia mummers, probably for secu-

lar as well as sacred purposes, assumed masks or other disguises as

animals in ancient Egypt. Sacred masking, so as to represent deities,

was hinted at by Maspero in 1899, but M. A. Murray developed the

1 Lepsius, Denkmäler aus Ägypten, ii (Berlin, 1859), pl. 56a.

2 Isis and Osiris, 376.

3 Ibid. 356.

4 C. Sachs, Die Musikinsrumente des alten Ägyptens (Berlin, 1921), figs. 59, 60, 104.

5 Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 352.

6 Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis, vi. 4.

7 The Cambridge Ancient History, i (Cambridge, 1924), pp. 328 ff.

8 Études de mythologie et d’archéologie égyptiennes, i (Paris, 1894), p. 153; A. Erman,

Life in Ancient Egypt (London, 1894), pp. 9, 60.

B 3608

S

Page 303

258

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

theme in 1934.1 We have several examples of animals performing on

instruments of music,2 but equally important is their occurrence as

figures on these instruments. All nature was one by the banks of the

Nile, and this is patent in the sphere of religion. Goddesses were

generally symbolized by the serpent and the latter was connected

with the sistrum down to the Roman period (30 B.C. onward).3 Hathor

(Isis) and Nephthys are delineated on sistra,4 in which the very jing-

ling bars are fashioned as serpents.5 A similar interpretation may be

placed on the falcon's head and the goose's head on the scrolls of

harps and citharas, since they symbolized the gods Month and Amen

respectively.6 Then there was the cat on sistra typifying Ba'stt, the

goddess of fire, while the jackal on kitharas was emblematic of

Anubis.7 These features were of far deeper significance than mere

emblems or symbols. They were a constant reminder that the voice

of deity was ever present in their tones; it was not only ears in

tonal appreciation that listened, but rather minds in transcendental

anagogue that understood.

Music therefore had a twofold influence on man in ancient Egypt;

one brought about by a purely physical sensation, and another created

or sustained by a power known as heka' or hike, which was something

like, and yet different from, what we understand by 'spell'. It may

be difficult to appreciate this hyperbole, and yet we still say 'enchant-

ing' (√cantus) and 'charming' (√carmen) in our praise of music today

without ever thinking that we are speaking in precisely the same way

as did the ancient Egyptians, although they meant what they said.

RELIGIOUS MUSIC

All through the history of music in ancient Egypt, modulated sound

itself was an arcanum. The name for sound was herw (lit. 'voice'), and

the word had an esoteric import in the cults.8 One recalls its omni-

potence in Mesopotamia where Ramman, for instance, was the 'spirit

of sonorous voice'. We read of the Egyptian god Thoth who made

Osiris 'true of voice'. The amulet which Isis hung about her neck was

interpreted as 'a true voice'. One of the special parts of the temple

liturgy was 'the going forth of the voice', but, as Alan H. Gardiner

has shown, it is not easy to apprehend what was actually performed

1 Mélanges Maspero: Orient ancien, i (Cairo, 1935), pp. 251 ff.

2 Erman, op. cit., p. 369; W. Chappell, The History of Music (London, 1874), p. 399;

Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pp. 57, 74.

3 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, fig. 22

4 Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 376.

5 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 323.

6 Ibid. ii, pp. 275, 280, 287, 291.

7 Ibid. ii, pp. 293, 326.

8 See Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 355.

Page 304

RELIGIOUS MUSIC

259

in this symbolic act. Certain it is that ‘such ceremonial utterance had

magical power’.1 Here is what Maspero has said of its conjurative

potency in the Egyptian temple:2

The human voice is the instrument par excellence of the priest and en-

chanter. It is the voice that seeks afar the Invisibles summoned, and makes

the necessary objects into reality. Every one of the sounds it emits has a

peculiar power which escapes the notice of the common run of mortals,

but which is known to and made use of by the adepts. . . . But as every

one [of the notes] has its peculiar force, great care must be taken not to

change their order or substitute one for the other.

Herodotus says that there was a college of priests in each temple,3 and

although there was an ‘hour priesthood’ of laymen, who may have

been something like the secular priests of the Christian west, the

temple ecclesiastics were few in number, generally about five, includ-

ing a high-priest and a lector-priest or precentor (hery-heb). Like the

Mesopotamian kalû (‘precentor’), some of these priests were ‘scribes

of divine books’, and Clement of Alexandria has described, at a very

late period, some of these writings. Speaking of the service he says:

‘First comes the Singer, bearing one of the symbols of music, for they

say that he must learn two of the books of Hermes, the one compris-

ing the hymns of the gods, the second the regulation for the king’s

life.’ There were also ten books devoted to hymns, prayers, proces-

sions, festivals, first fruits, and other constituent parts of temple wor-

ship.4 It was a part of the regular duties of the priests to extol the god

in songs in the daily ceremonial as well as at the great festivals, but

Erman remarks that we do not know whether these songs were merely

recited or whether they were sung.5 This incertitude is of little import

because, in these early days, whatever was recited was done so in a

chant. Philology often confirms this, and the Arabic equivalent to the

Egyptian šedi (‘to recite’) is shadā (‘to sing’).

Many of the rituals, liturgies, hymns, and lamentations have been

translated for us, and in these we are able to grasp the abiding signi-

ficance of the solemn temple services. Among the above translations

are two by Raymond O. Faulkner, the ‘Songs of Isis and Nephthys’

in The Papyrus Bremner-Rhind, and the ‘Lamentations of Isis and

Nephthys’ in Mélanges Maspero, which have passing interest because

the first was part of a ritual spread over five days, while the second

was what one might term a breviary for one day, and the two were

1 Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, xviii, p. 108; Egyptian Grammar

(Oxford, 1927), p. 172.

2 Études de mythologie, i, p. 106.

3 ii. 37. A. H. Sayce, The Religion of Ancient Egypt (London, 1913), p. 32.

4 Op. cit. vi. 4.

5 Life in Ancient Egypt (London, 1894), p. 47.

Page 305

260

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

musically distinct. Of the ‘Songs’ Faulkner says: ‘Apart from a hymn

to Osiris sung by the lector-priest in the middle of the ceremony, the

songs consist of alternate duets by the two priestesses and solos on

the part of her who represented Isis.’ In this, Osiris is invoked as ‘the

fair sistrum player’, and the priestesses carry tambourines. In the

‘Lamentations’ we do not find any of these things, and in the place

of tambourines other sacred tokens are carried.

When the New Kingdom arose (c. 1570 B.C.), the female temple

musician began to make her appearance. She was the šem‘ayt who

was already a feature in secular life. Many of these were wives and

daughters of the priests, although other classes were also represented.

They were looked upon as inmates of the harem of the god, in which

they held nominally the same position they would have held in real

life. For this reason the highest ladies of the land took these sacred

offices in the cults, being known as the ‘wife of the god’, ‘chief of the

singers of the table of Amen’, or ‘songstress of Amen’.1 These came

to be a powerful corporation, and their lady superior, the ‘divine

adorer of Amen’, shared sovereignty with the kings during the Saite

period (c. 664–525 B.C.).2 Their instrument of sacerdotal potency and

ecclesiastical authority was the sistrum, or sistra rather, since we more

frequently see one of each kind, the šehem and seššet, being used, one

in each hand.3 The word šehem itself meant [‘divine] power’, but its

metallic ‘voice’, i.e. its jingling apparatus, was made mute since its

form was sufficiently symbolic of its potent sound. Precisely the same

metamorphosis came to the clapper called menyt which, after the rise

of the New Kingdom, is generally found folded in the hands of the

priestesses or divine singers.4

Under the Old and Middle Kingdoms, the court musicians held

high positions, and were considered as ‘near relations’ of the king.

Under the New Kingdom their significance was just as weighty, and

the actual names of several have been preserved who held the position

of ‘chief of the singers of Pharaoh’. He was the nominal head of all

musicians since he is designated ‘chief of the singers of all the gods’.

When we get glimpses of the royal family at worship, sistra predomi-

nate,5 and these are often in the hands of princesses.6 Occasionally

1 Wilkinson, op. cit. i, p. 260; G. Fouchart, Tombes thébaines (Cairo, 1932), p. 35.

2 G. Maspero, Histoire d’orient, iii (Paris, 1896–9), pp. 164, 173, 490.

3 Lepsius, op. cit. vii, pls. 175, 186, 193; viii, pls. 247–50.

4 V. Loret, ‘Égypte’, in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la musique,

1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), figs. 20–24.

5 N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of El Amarna (London, 1903–8), iv. pls. xv, xxxi,

xliv; v, pls. iii, xxvi.

6 Ibid. vi, pls. xxvii, xxxvi.

Page 306

clappers1 and tambourines2 found a hallowed place in adoration or supplication in the temples, possible because, like the sistra, their 'voices' were in monotone, a something nearer to the womb of things.

Yet temple music consisted of much more than chanting, jingling, rattling, and drumming. From early times quite a variety of other instruments found acceptance in worship, except perhaps in that devoted to Osiris at Abydos where, says Strabo, neither singer, piper, nor kitharist was allowed.3 We see a royal family in adoration of deity [i.e. the sun's disk] with a harpist and three singers,4 and in one of the art remains at Leiden, there are delineated a harpist, pandorist, and two flautists accompanying the chanting of an incense-sprinkling priest.5 Indeed in every representation of religious life and practice in ancient Egypt, music and musical instruments play a prominent part.

Even in the funerary proceedings we not only hear the gruesome lamentation (nehwt = Arabic niyahat) of more primitive animistic times, but also the joyous sounds of singing, harping, fluting, and dancing, not merely delineated on the tomb walls but in actual practice.

Music in the temples continued to be of the utmost importance even throughout the Greek and Roman periods. Among the numerous art remains revealed in the Greek city of Naukratis is a figure of Apollo with a harp,6 and at Armant of Roman times, the sistrum still found a place in the hands of goddess and priestesses.7 The flute or reed-pipe was certainly still attached to the service of Amen, and Apuleius and Claudian both testify to its presence in the temple.8 Of course it was the emblem of fertility, and indeed the 'field of reeds' was one of the promised scenes in Elyseum.9 The common people were certainly attached to it when they entered into the spirit of openair worship.

Once a year they 'joined their priests in a melancholy procession through the streets, singing a doleful ditty called the Manerōs',10 and Herodotus also affirms that at the festival of Osiris they had processions, the women carrying images preceded by an aulos player (reed-piper).11

1 A. M. Blackman, The Rock Tombs of Meir (London, 1914), pl. xviii.

2 E. Naville, The Festival-Hall of Osorkon II (London, 1892), pp. 14, 24, 26; pls. xi, xvi.

3 Strabo, Geographus, xvii. i. 43.

4 N. de G. Davies, op. cit. i, p. 33; pl. xxxiii.

5 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 316; G. Steindorff, Die Kunst der Ägypter (Leipzig, 1928), p. 244.

6 W. M. Flinders Petrie, Naukratis, ii (London, 1888), p. 57; pls. xiv, 14; xvii. 4.

7 R. Mond, Temples of Armant (London, 1940), p. 180; pl. xcii, 16.

8 Metamorphosis, xi.

9 A. Erman, op. cit., p. 306.

10 S. Sharpe, Egyptian Mythology (London, 1863), p. 10.

11 ii. 48.

Page 307

262

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

pilgrims who journeyed to the Bubastis festival, we see the flute or reed-pipe players leading the semi-hysterical multitude. Some of the women jingled their sistra in frenzied excitement, while others, in greater abandon, exposed themselves;1 as Curt Sachs has shown in his Geist und Werden der Musikinstrumente, the flute has ever been considered the sexual instrument par excellence. Strabo tells of similar scenes among the visitors to the temple of Serapis at Canobus, where there was fluting or reed-piping with dancing and ‘extreme licentiousness’.2 It is no wonder that Aristotle considered that the aulos did not improve morals.

SECULAR MUSIC

All music, whether in the temple, the palace, or the street, was called hy, which meant primarily ‘joy’, ‘gladness’. It was sometimes written with a hieroglyph which represented a fragrant lotus in bloom. A musician was known by a genuine Semitic word šem‘a (Hebrew šamā‘, Arabic samā‘ = ‘music’), as well as by other names. The word for ‘praise’ was henw, and it probably meant ‘song’ also (cf. ‘ānn and the Arabic ghanna (‘to sing’). The Hebrew word (cf. the Egyptian ‘an) came to mean ‘to answer’, and we have seen that the Akkadian word enū implied this also.3 Perhaps henw was only used when the strophe and antistrophe were employed, and we have seen that the antiphon existed in the Egyptian temple liturgy. On the instrumental side we also find a few provoking technical terms, e.g. teh or tehen (‘to beat’, ‘to play’), of which the Hebrew tāqa‘ and the Abyssinian take‘ may be kindred.

The male musician is a familiar figure in the art remains from the 4th dynasty (twenty-sixth century B.C.).4 Here he is to be seen in all phases of professional activity: singer, instrumentalist, and dancer. Erman held the view that the singers waved their arms when performing,5 which is also the opinion of Blackman.6 On the other hand, Curt Sachs avers that the delineations do not merely indicate arm waving. He thinks the positions of the hands and fingers of the singers reveal certain manual and digital movements by which definite indications were communicated to the accompanists.7 Yet it is not improbable

1 ii. 60. 2 Op. cit., xvii. i. 17.

3 Chap. V., p. 234. 4 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 232, 239, 257, 316, 335–7; Lepsius, op. cit. iii, figs. 35–36, 52–53, 61, 74; iv. 109. 5 Op. cit., p. 251. 6 Op. cit., p. 12.

7 The Rise of Music in the Ancient World (New York, 1941), p. 78.

Page 308

SECULAR MUSIC

263

that the conjunction of the finger and thumb in the so-called 'hand-

signs' may be no more than the physical prelude to the 'tick-tack'

or finger snap.1 It is likely, however, that Sachs rightly interprets the

position of the hand of the singer which is placed at the side of the

head2 as the Eastern custom of compressing the larynx so as to force

the high notes,3 as we have seen in Mesopotamia,4 and the shrill high-

pitched voice (hy) was much admired in the East.5

In 1949 and 1952 Hans Hickmann developed this chironomic

theory. In his first paper, Sur les survivances de la chironomie égyptienne

dans le chant liturgique copte, he shows that a system of chironomy

exists today in this church, but no evidence is produced of its earlier

usage by this church. In the second paper, La Musique polyphonique

dans l'Égypte ancienne, the author demonstrates the probability of

'accords'—the octave and dominant—on the harp by other means

than those mentioned by Sachs. Further, he shows that the chiro-

nomic conjunction of the thumb and forefinger by the singer con-

veyed to the accompanist on the flute or harp that he was to play

the tonic, whilst the vertical open hand signified the dominant.

Why a singer should have to convey such signs to an accom-

panist to obtain such elementary musical accomplishments is not

explained.6

Besides these performers there were the female musicians who

swarmed into social life soon after the rise of the 18th dynasty

(c. 1570 B.C.). The court of the king and the palaces of the nobility

were replete with these newcomers from Syrian and other Semitic

lands; they belonged to the harem. Under the Old Kingdom we read

of the 'chief of the singers' who was also 'chief of the harem', and

we even know their names, but under the new dispensation their

responsibilities must have been far greater in this control of what was

known as the 'beautiful pleasures of the king'.7 A most intimate

scene is revealed during the 18th dynasty in a bird's-eye view of a

palatial academy of music, with harps, kitharas, and pandores crowd-

ing out the furniture of the apartments. Here we espy these 'singing-

girls' being instructed in the vocal and instrumental art.8 There were

1 L. Borchardt, Denkmäler des alten Reiches, i (Berlin, 1927), pl. 47.

2 M. E. Grébaut, Le Musée égyptien (Cairo, 1890-1900), p. 25, pl. xxvi.

3 Sachs, The Rise of Music, p. 78.

4 See Chap. V, p. 238.

5 Revue égyptologique, xii, p. 8.

6 Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte, xlix (1949); Bulletin de l'Institut

d'Égypte, xxxiv (1952).

7 A. Mariette, Les Mastabas de l'ancien empire (Paris, 1881).

8 N. de G. Davies, op. cit. vi, p. 20; pls. xxviii, xxxvi.

Page 309

264

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

even independent academies of music, since we are told that the finest

of these was at Memphis.1

What it was that these damsels of the ‘beautiful face’ sang we know

in one respect, for thanks to the labours of Maspero, Max Müller,

and Baillet, we are at least able to scan the lines of the verses, though

not a note of music is vouchsafed to us. If the music were comparable

to the verse, then it was most praiseworthy, since almost every human

chord is touched in these beautiful songs, and with an artistry of

expression that is superb. The ‘Song of the Harper’, first crooned at

the funerary rites of the priest Nefer-ḥetep millennia ago, is known

the world over. Who can forget the lines:2

Let there be music and singing before thee,

Cast behind thee all cares, and mind thee of joy,

Till there cometh that day,

When we journey to that land that loveth silence.

There were instruments in abundance to accompany singers and

dancers. Every conceivable type known in the ancient world found

its place in ancient Egypt. Kitharas and harps of all shapes and sizes,

with flutes and reed-pipes of equal diversity, and manifold drums,

tambourines, and crotala. When the world was young, under the Old

Kingdom (third millennium B.C.), a harp, a flute, and a reed-pipe,

handled by males, were deemed sufficient with singers,3 but with the

bevies of Oriental singing-girls that had been brought into Egypt, the

male performer seems to have been overshadowed. Still, the latter

remained, it would seem, the mainstay of the music of the people, as

the picture of the blind harper and his seven blind singers seems to

prove.4 From the time of the Saite period, the male musician prob-

ably regained his prestige.

Herodotus visited Egypt about 440 B.C. The Egyptians, he says,

like the Spartans, followed the trades and professions of their fathers,

so that a musician would naturally be the son of a musician.5 An-

other statement concerns a national song called the Manerōs which,

he said, had been known to the Egyptians from time immemorial. ‘It

was the first and only song that they used at that early period of their

1 S. Birch, The Anastasi Papyri in the British Museum (London, 1843). For music as a

profession see H. Hickmann, ‘Le Métier de musicien au temps des Pharaons’, in Cahiers

d’histoire égyptienne, sér. iv. (Le Caire, 1952) pp. 79 ff.

2 Erman, op. cit., pp. 385 ff. See also The Cambridge Ancient History, i, pp. 324 ff., and

Journal of Near Eastern Studies, iv, pp. 178–212.

3 Lepsius, op. cit. iii, figs. 35–36.

4 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 239; fig. 193.

5 vi, 60.

Page 310

SECULAR MUSIC

265

history.' It was identical with the Linus song which he had heard in Phoenicia, Cyprus, and elsewhere, and he was surprised to find it in Egypt.1 Of supreme importance is the testimony of his later contemporary, Plato, who is said to have studied in Egypt. It will be recalled that the Athenian guest in Plato's Laws, in laying down plans for the education of youth, pointed out that in Egypt only the highest art and the best music were permitted, and that such were approved by the temple. No deviation, it was said, was permitted from the established forms in art and music, to which principle Plato heartily subscribed.2 The statement reveals that in spite of its political troubles, Egypt still maintained a musical standard that was marvelled at by others.

However far-fetched the lengthy panegyric of Callixenus of Rhodes may be, as retailed by Athenaeus at a later period, one cannot forbear to cite that 'choral band of six hundred men', among whom were 300 harpers performing together on gilded harps. That was in the days of Ptolemy Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.).3 Nor was the flair for music to be found only in courtly and patrician circles, since one of the interlocutors in the dialogues of Athenaeus remarks:

I would have you know . . . that there is no record in the history of other people more musical than the Alexandrians, and I am not speaking merely of singing to the harp, for even the humblest layman among us . . . can immediately detect the mistakes which occur in striking the notes.

He then goes on to dilate on the number of flutes and reed-pipes, four at least, with which the Alexandrians were familiar.4 One of Egypt's later rulers, Ptolemy Auletes (81–52 B.C.), the reputed father of the great Cleopatra, was addicted to piping, hence his name.5 In the palace concerts he contested with the professional musicians for supremacy.6

Diodorus Siculus, writing a few years later, avers that music was not, in those days, a part of normal education, since it was thought not only useless but morally injurious, in that it created effeminacy.7 Whether this is strictly true of the classes as a whole is doubtful. Yet that such a puritanical view existed in Egypt at this time is not improbable. Indeed the word šemc ('to sing') came to mean something unrighteous ('to be perverse', 'to corrupt').8 Such protests, probably by the few, would have had little sway with the people at large.

1 ii. 79. Strabo says (xvii. 1. 52) that Herodotus talked 'much nonsense'. Cf. Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 379.

2 Laws, 657.

3 Athenaeus, v. 201–2.

4 Ibid. iv. 176.

5 J. P. Mahaffy, The Empire of the Ptolemies (London, 1895), pp. 429 ff.

6 Strabo, op. cit. vii, i. 11.

7 i. 81.

8 Journal asiatique (Mars-Avril, 1908), pp. 263, 266. Cf. the Coptic tchoome.

Page 311

266

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

Whether it was taught or not, music was the heritage of all, and social

life, from the cradle to the grave, called for it. Between those two

events, almost every phase of life demanded music of some sort, and

we still possess the papyrus contract of a musician who was engaged

in Egypt, nearly 2,000 years ago, to play with his fellows for the

delight of those who cried: ‘Let there be music and singing!’1

If we turn to military music, we see the trumpeter and drummer at

their duties, summoning the troops, sounding them past the saluting

point, or inciting them to battle.2 If we look at the toilers, we have

the opportunity of reading the words at least of a shepherd’s song of

the twenty-fifth century B.C., a thresher’s song of the sixteenth cen-

tury B.C.,3 as well as the sedan-chair bearer’s song,4 and others.5 We

probably see what sufficed for the crowd on a papyrus in the British

Museum which depicts a ‘march of the animals’ to the droning of

a double reed-pipe,6 whilst one of the Tell al-Amarna scenes shows

us what joy emerged in country dancing,7 all of which may be seen

today by the banks of the Nile. Not a note of the actual music that

was played or sung has come down to us.

Under the Old Kingdom, perhaps the days of a more indigenous

art, dances were possessed of a gravity and seriousness that does not

appear in those of the New Kingdom, which had been spiced with

Oriental fashions. One of the most expressive dance scenes in Egyp-

tian art remains is that reproduced by Champollion,8 Rosellini,9 and

Wilkinson,10 in which the graceful attitudinizing shows an unmistak-

ably spacious solemn rhythm. How different is the tempo on the

Saqqara bas-relief, now at Cairo. Here the pace of the dancers is fast

and furious.11 The larger deep-toned tambourine of rectangular shape

has been cast aside, and its place has been taken by a smaller circular

instrument, of which the higher-pitched ‘tap’ is more in accord with

the sharper click of the accompanying clappers.

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

Idiophones occur in the earliest Egyptian art remains. On archaic

pottery (fourth millennium B.C.) are delineated clappers with curved

1 Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, x (1924), p. 145.

2 Wilkinson, op. cit., pp. 260–9; Champollion, op. cit. iii, pls. ccix, ccxviii.

3 Erman, op. cit., pp. 385 ff.

4 N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of Deir el Gebrāwi, 2 vols. (London, 1902), i, p. 11.

5 Mélanges Maspero: Orient ancien i (Paris, 1934), pp. 133 ff.

6 Erman, op. cit., p. 369.

7 Lepsius, op. cit., vi, pl. 104.

8 Op. cit. ii, pl. clxxv.

9 I Monumenti dell’ Egitto (Pisa, 1832–4), pl. xcviii.

10 Op. cit. ii, fig. 236.

11 L. Borchardt, Kunstwerke aus dem Ägyptischen Museum zu Cairo (Cairo, n.d.),

pl. 28; Erman, op. cit., p. 249.

Page 312

blades,1 and these persist as late as the 18th dynasty (c. 1570 B.C.) at

least.2 The wand type of clapper is observed in the 5th dynasty

(twenty-fourth century B.C.).3 What we nowadays call the 'bones' are

to be seen under the New Kingdom (c. 1570 B.C.).4 Another kind,

clashing maces, were popular during the 6th dynasty (c. 2300 B.C.)

and later.5 These concussive instruments may have been called ihy and

na'tahi, the latter word being possibly cognate with the Hebrew

nāsach. In addition to these were artificial hands and feet in bone,

wood, or ivory, which were beaten together in the same way as hand-

clapping, a practice known in Egyptian as ma'h,6 a word identical

with the Hebrew mācha. Innumerable specimens of these artificial

hand and feet clappers are to be found in museums.7

Sistra of various kinds were known, and in these particular types

we may have indigenous productions. One kind, the sehem, had a

body of pottery or wood with jingling plates inserted.8 We see it in

the 6th dynasty (c. 2300 B.C.).9 A more sonorous kind was the šes, seš,

or seššet, which had a metal body with jingling metal bars inserted.10

Both types are to be seen in museums,11 and in art remains,12 down to

Roman times. Cymbals of the plate type were of late intrusion, al-

though the cup type is probably to be recognized on a figurine of the

Greek period (332–30 B.C.).13 Clapper cymbals also occur in actual

specimens of the Graeco-Roman period.14 Bells of all kinds are

plentiful.15

Membranophones are well represented in actual specimens and art

remains. Cylindrical,16 as well as squat and elongated barrel-shaped

1 D. Randall-MacIver and C. Mace, El Amra and Abydos (London, 1902), pl. xiv.

2 J. J. Tylor and F. L. Griffith, The Tomb of Paheri at El Kab (London, 1894).

3 Lepsi us, op. cit. ii, pl. 56a.

4 Borchardt, op. cit., pl. 228.

5 W. M. Flinders Petrie, Dedasheh (London, 1898), p. 8; pl. xii; N. de G. Davies, The

Tomb of Antefoker (London, 1920), p. xxiii.

6 J. de Morgan, Fouilles à Dachour en 1894–95 (Vienna, 1903), pl. xxv.

7 Loret, op. cit., p. 5, figs. 10–12.; Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pl. i.

8 E. A. W. Budge, An Egyptian Hieroglyphic Dictionary (London, 1920), pp. 616, 754.

Cf. Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pp. 28 ff., and History of Musical Instruments (New

York, 1940), pp. 89 ff. Cf. Hickmann, Catalogue, pp. 76–77, for classification.

9 Flinders Petrie, Dendereh (London, 1900), pl. x.

10 Champollion, op. cit. iii, pl. cclxxxi.

11 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 325 ff.; Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pls. 3–5.

12 Lepsi us, op. cit. vii, pls. 175, 186, 193; viii, pl. 247.

13 C. Engel, Music of the Most Ancient Nations (London, 1870), p. 227.

14 Loret, op. cit., p. 7; Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pl. i.

15 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pp. 23 ff., pl. i. Cf. Hickmann, Catalogue général des

instruments de musique du Musée du Caire (Cairo, 1949), pp. 1–103 for all idiophones.

This author has also made a separate study of bells in an article entitled 'Zur Geschichte

der altägyptischen Glocken' in Musik und Kirche (Kassel, 1951), Heft 2.

16 J. Garstang, Burial Customs of Egypt (London, 1907), fig. 155.

Page 313

268

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

drums,1 are preserved at Cairo and Paris, the former dating from the

12th dynasty (c. 1989 B.C.). The elongated form persisted up to the

Saite period (c. 664–525 B.C.), if not later.2 There was also a hand

kettledrum, so well known from Champollion’s design,3 which dates

from the 18th dynasty, as well as the vase-shaped darabukka type,

and the cylindrical body form, often found in the hands of the god

Bes, which was probably the drum called qemqem.4 The generic name

for the drum was teben (Akkad. ṭabālu). Budge thought that a’séh

stood for the squat barrel-shaped drum. The tambourine or frame

drum was known as the ser or śer, a large example of which, not

unlike the supposed alal of Mesopotamia, was used in Egypt at

the Temple of the Sun at Abusir (twenty-sixth century B.C.). Even

later, at the time of Osorkon II (c. 800 B.C.), we see a tambourine

over 2 feet in diameter being used,5 although Borchardt, who devoted

an article to the tambourine, suggested—wrongly—that this was a

gong.6 A more portable instrument of the 18th dynasty is shown by

Champollion in the picture just mentioned, while an even smaller

specimen found favour during the Greek period.7 Under the New

Kingdom (c. 1570 B.C.) a large rectangular tambourine, with concave

sides, appeared.8 It is also seen in a bronze figure of the time of Amen-

ḥetep IV (c. 1377 B.C.).9 Specimens are conserved in museums.

Among the woodwind, the earliest example of the upright, end-

blown flute is figured on a predynastic (fourth millennium B.C.)

palette.10 In spite of opinions to the contrary, the flute may have been

known as the seba’ or seby, in which case we recognize its progeny in

the Coptic sēbe and sēbi.11 Normally seb or seba’ means ‘to play [a

flute or reed-pipe]’. This instrument is often found during the Old

1 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 264–70; figs. 202–4.

2 G. Maspero, Le Musée égyptien (Cairo, 1907), pls. xl, xli.

3 Champollion, op. cit. ii, pl. clxxxvi.

4 See Hickmann, ‘La Daraboukkah’, in the Bulletin de l’Institut d’Égypte, xxxiii

(Cairo, 1952), pp. 229 ff., for this and similar drums.

5 E. Naville, The Festival-Hall of Osorkon II (London, 1892), pp. 14, 24, 26; pls. xi,

xiv, xvi.

6 Borchardt, Mélanges Maspero, Orient ancien, i (Cairo, 1934), pp. 1–6.

7 W. Weber, Mitteilungen aus der ägyptischen Abteilung der Königl. Museen zu Berlin

(Berlin, 1914), pl. 24.

8 Champollion, op. cit. ii, pl. clxxxvi; Kinsky, Geschichte der Musik in Bildern

(Leipzig, 1929), p. 5.

9 A. Weigall, Ancient Egyptian Works of Art (London, 1924), p. 152. The instrument

has been fully described by Hans Hickmann in ‘Miscellanea Musicologica’, x, ‘Le

Tambourin rectangulaire du Nouvel Empire’ (Annales du Service des Antiquités de

l’Égypte, li (Cairo, 1951), pp. 317 ff.).

10 J. E. Quibell and F. W. Green, Hierakonpolis, ii (London, 1903), pl. 28.

11 See Loret, op. cit., pp. 14 ff. and Journal asiatique (juil.-août, 1889), pp. 121–33,

but cf. Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments, p. 90.

Page 314

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

269

and Middle Kingdoms (third-second millennia B.C.).1 Some of these flutes were from 4 to 5 feet in length. Two other types of flutes, doubtless of Semitic origin,2 were the wa'yr and the wa'di, mentioned in connexion with Ptolemy Auletes (81–52 B.C.).3 The wa'yr, wa'ra', or wa'r, is possibly cognate with the Arabic yarā', which was a recorder.4 The wa'di, wa'd'ai, or wa'deni is likely to have been the instrument called by the Greeks the photinx.5

The reed-pipe seems to have been known as the ma' (Old Kingdom), met or ma', although the term was applied to any woodwind instrument.6 This reed-pipe may be discerned as early as the 4th dynasty (twenty-sixth century B.C.).7 The double reed-pipe is shown in both the parallel and the angular forms. Loret once hinted,8 that this instrument may have been the is or isit (lit. 'reed'), but he later abandoned this identification.9 E. Brunner-Traut has now given the name a'a't to this type. Under the New Kingdom the parallel form was superseded by the angular, most likely under Oriental prompting.10 It frequently appears in the art remains,11 and on a wall painting in the British Museum one can plainly distinguish the embouchure reeds.12 Actual specimens are fairly plentiful in museums, and their scales have been made the subject of special studies by several musicologists.13 Statuettes demonstrate the popularity of the instrument down to the Christian era.14

The animal horn was the 'ab, 'abw, and deb, but there is no evidence of its use under these names as a wind-instrument, although we have seen wooden horns or trumpets being presented to Amen-ḥetep III by the Mitanni ruler Dushratta (c. 1380 B.C.).15 On the other hand,

1 Lepsius, op. cit. ii, pls. 36, 52, 61, 74; A. M. Blackman, The Royal Tombs of Meir (London, 1915), p. 12; pl. xxi, 2. See pl. 9 (a).

2 Erman, op. cit., p. 516.

3 S. Birch, The Anatasi Papyri in the British Museum, iv (London, 1843), pl. xii. See also A. H. Gardiner, Egyptian Hieratic Texts (Leipzig, 1909).

4 H. G. Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments (London, 1931), i, p. 64; A. Chottin, Tableau de la musique marocaine (Paris, 1939), pl. xvi. Līra = al-yarā'.

5 Athenaeus, Deipnosophistes, iv. 175, 182; Journal asiatique (juil.-août, 1889), p. 133; K. Sethe, Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache, xlv (1908), p. 85.

6 Cf. A. H. Gardiner, Egyptian Grammar (Oxford, 1927), p. 525; E. Brunner-Traut, Der Tanz im alten Ägypten (Gluckstadt, 1938), p. 17.

7 Lepsius, op. cit. iii, pl. 36.

8 Journal asiatique (juil.-août, 1889), p. 133.

9 Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i, p. 15.

10 Ibid., p. 16.

11 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 232, 234-5, 312. See pl. 9 (b).

12 Erman, op. cit., facing p. 250.

13 See Bibliography.

14 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, p. 80. See Hickmann, 'Classement et classification des flûtes, clarinettes et hautbois de l'Égypte ancienne' in La Chronique d'Égypte, xxvie année (Bruxelles, 1951), pp. 17 ff.

15 J. A. Knudtzon, Die El-Amarna Tafeln (Leipzig, 1908), pp. 155 ff.

Page 315

270

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

the straight metal trumpet is well represented in military and processional scenes during the New Kingdom and earlier.1 It was also used in the cults; Eustathius (Ad Iliadem) attributes its invention to Osiris, and it was used in his worship as late as the third century A.D.2 We cannot be sure of its Egyptian name but Eustathius says that the Greek chnoue was sounded to gather the congregation for the sacrifice, and this may well be the Greek pronunciation of the Egyptian šneb. It has been assumed that the Egyptians 'were not very successful' in making trumpets, the apparent authority being Plutarch;3 yet the author of De Iside et Osiride merely states that the inhabitants of Busiris and Lycopolis did not permit the use of the trumpet because its sound resembled the braying of an ass.4 This veto had nothing to do with any supposed Egyptian imperfection in the trumpet as such; it was because the evil god Typhon was considered to have all the attributes of the ass. Cairo possesses among its museum treasures a silver and a copper trumpet, both with gold mountings, from the tomb of Tut-anh-amen,5 which have been played in modern times and sound quite brilliant.6

The hydraulus, the so-called water organ, was invented by Ctesibius of Alexandria (fl. 246–221 B.C.),7 the son of a barber who lived in the quarter of the Aspendia. Clément Loret's researches on the hydraulus are summarized in his son's study of the musical instruments of ancient Egypt in Lavignac's Encyclopédie de la musique,8 but the instrument is usually allocated to colonial Greece, which also claims another Egyptian writer on the hydraulus, Hero of Alexandria (fl. A.D. 150).9

The chordophones of ancient Egypt are even more interesting than those of ancient Mesopotamia, because their morphological development can be discerned with greater clarity over several millennia. The upright lower-chested harp goes back iconographically to the 4th dynasty (twenty-sixth century B.C.) at the very least. At Gizeh we

1 Lepsius, op. cit. ii, pl. cxii; iii, pls. ccix, ccxviii.

2 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, p. 89.

3 Reese, Music in the Middle Ages (New York, 1940), p. 7.

4 Isis and Osiris, 362.

5 H. Carter, The Tomb of Tut-ankh-Amen, ii (London, 1927), pp. 19, 30; pl. 2.

6 See Hickmann, La Trompette dans l'Égypte ancienne (Supplément du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte, Cairo, 1946). Cf. P. K. Kirby, 'Ancient Egyptian Trumpets' in Music Book, vii (London, 1952), pp. 250 ff.

7 Paul Tannery in Revue des études grecques, ix (1896), pp. 23 ff., xxi (1908), pp. 326 ff.

8 1re partie, i, pp. 30–34.

9 For the most complete description, see H. G. Farmer's The Organ of the Ancient (London, 1931).

Page 316

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

271

espy the identical bow-harp predicated in Mesopotamia as the ban or pan, but in a form much nearer its days of puberty. At this early date, when it was known in Egypt as the ben, bent, or bin, bint (cf. Coptic boini, oyoiní), it had a narrow and perfectly cylindrical crescent-shaped body with six strings (but seemingly seven pegs).1 By the 5th dynasty, the lower end of this narrow cylindrical body had developed a definite hemispherical sound-chest.2 From the 6th dynasty (c. 2300 B.C.) onwards, these forms seem to continue with but slight deviation, until we perceive the gradual widening of the body and sound-chest, from top to bottom, which became the recognized structure about the 12th dynasty (c. 1989 B.C.),3 although earlier forms still appear from time to time even until the seventh century.4 With the rise of the 18th dynasty a melioration and refinement of structure and purpose are clearly revealed, until by the time of Rameses III (c. 1200 B.C.), we have the superb so-called Bruce's harps.5 In these two instruments, which stood over 6 feet high, furnished with ten (? eleven) and twelve (? thirteen) strings respectively, handsomely ornamented, we reach the apogee of harp construction in ancient Egypt,6 although even taller instruments (7 feet high) had existed earlier.7

Meanwhile (c. 1989 B.C.), the ordinary smaller harps had changed their outline from the crescent to the semicircular,8 a contour which lasted until the Christian era.9 All the foregoing were played in the conventional way, i.e. standing on the ground, although in a few instances we find stands being used to raise the sound-chest from the floor.10 By the late Middle Kingdom (c. 1776 B.C.) a portable shoulder harp made its appearance,11 the raised sound-chest of which, although seemingly a novelty, dated back to early days.12

1 Lepsius, op. cit. iii, pl. 36. In the art remains, strings and pegs often disagree.

2 Flinders Petrie, Dedashch, p. 8; pl. xii; Kinsky, Geschichte der Musik in Bildern, p. 4.

3 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 234 ff. See pl. 9 (a) and (b).

4 N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of Deir el-Gebráwi, i, p. 15; pl. viii.

5 J. Bruce, Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, i (London, 1790), p. 127. He fancifully depicts them with thirteen and eighteen strings.

6 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, frontispiece. Cf. Rosellini, op. cit. ii, pl. xcvii, and Champollion, op. cit. iii, pl. cclxi, for the number of strings. Cf. Hickmann, ‘Les harpes de la tombe de Ramsès II’ in Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte, 1 (Cairo, 1950), pp. 523 ff.

7 Champollion, op. cit. iv, pl. ccccix.

8 Wilkinson, op. cit., pp. 238-9; P. E. Newberry, Beni Hasan (London, 1893), pl. xii.

9 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente des alten Ägyptens, p. 66; figs. 95a, 96.

10 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, figs. 185-6; Rosellini, ii, pl. lxxix.

11 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, figs. 209, 215; Champollion, op. cit., ii, pl. cxlii.

12 Champollion, op. cit. iv, pl. cccci.

Page 317

272

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

Among other Oriental borrowings under the 18th dynasty was the upper-chested harp.1 This, as we have seen in Mesopotamia, was simply the horizontal lower-chested harp turned sideways and with the angle made semi-acute.2 We cannot be sure of its name, but it may have been the instrument called the da'da't, with a possible variant da'da'newt.3 Delineations also date from this period,4 and it continued to enjoy popularity right through the Greek period (332–30 B.C.).5 Like the lower-chested harp, the face of the hollow sound-chest was covered with leather or parchment, a feature which may be noted in actual specimens or reproductions at Paris, Cairo, and New York,6 on the first of which are twenty-two strings,7 while a small wooden figurine in the British Museum carries but six strings on the instrument. By the time of Euergetes II (second century B.C.) the sound-chest had become an acute angle.8

Older still was the kithara, which was also of exotic origin.9 We first discern it in the 12th dynasty about the year 1890 B.C., in the famous Beni Hasan pictures. These represent Bedouin called the ‘Aa'mu (Arabic 'amm = ‘men of a tribe’) who, under their shaikh, Abšai, i.e. Abū Shahī, go to Egypt to pay tribute to a certain Prince Henem-ḥetep.10 Among the shaikh's retainers is a kitharist, and perhaps the shaikh himself was called Abū Shahī (‘Father of Pleasantry’) because of his esteem for music, since the Arabs give this nickname to the lute itself.11 This scene shows a plain, rectangular folk kithara which is played with a plectrum.12 It is held with the strings lying horizontally, a custom which continued for centuries, even when an

1 Erman, op. cit., p. 253.

2 See Chap. V, p. 243.

3 A. H. Gardiner, The Admonition of an Egyptian Sage (Leipzig, 1909), pp. 7, 13; H. Brugsch, Thesaurus Inscriptionum Aegyptiacarum (Leipzig, 1881–91), p. 524. Cf. East-African ze-ze, and Hickmann, Bulletin de l'Institut d'Égypte, xxxv, pp. 361 ff.

4 N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of El Amarna (London, 1903–8), vi, pls. 6, 28.

5 C. M. Kaufmann, Graeco-ägyptische Koroplastik (Leipzig, 1915), pls. 5, 58.

6 Loret, op. cit., p. 29; Catalogue of the Crosby Brown Collection of Musical Instruments, iii (New York, 1906), p. 3.

7 Wilkinson, Engel, and Chappell show the instrument with twenty-one strings, but with twenty-two tassel string ends.

8 Champollion, op. cit. i, pl. li. Wilkinson's picture of this harp is given upside down, obviously the way in which it was displayed at Paris (cf. the tassels). This was copied by musicologists, including Engel and Chappell, for three-quarters of a century. Further currency was given to the blunder when Sir Laurence Alma-Tadema represented it thus in his well-known painting 'Pastime in Ancient Egypt'.

9 Erman, op. cit., p. 253.

10 The derivation of 'Aa'mu is not settled.

11 Ibn Ma'rūf, Kanz al-lugha, s.v. shahī.

12 Lepsius, op. cit. iv, pl. 133; Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pl. xiv; Rosellini, op. cit. i, p. xxviii.

Page 318

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

273

asymmetrically shaped kithara had been adopted in the 18th dynasty (c. 1570 B.C.).1 After a while, larger and more imposing instruments came into use, some with as many as fifteen strings, as in the satirical Turin papyrus (20th dynasty)2 and other delineations.3 Some were standing types as large as those of Mesopotamia.4 A few portable specimens exist in museums at Leiden, Cairo, and Berlin.5 Being a harp-like instrument, it was probably counted generically as a ben or bent, yet about 1200 B.C. it seems to have been given a distinctive name in kena’na’wr, a word strongly suggestive of the Hebrew kinnōr and the Arabic kinnāra, which possibly survived in the Coptic qinêra. There is no evidence of lyres, as distinct from kitharas, being adopted during the Greek period.6

Lastly comes the pandore or long-necked lute, whose Egyptian name has been the subject of so much pother (see pl. 9 (b)). Tempted by the ideogram nefer (good), which resembled the form of the pandore, and by the fact that ‘f’ and ‘b’, and ‘r’ and ‘l’ were inter-changeable, some authorities considered the Egyptian nefer and the term nebel (instrument) of the Old Testament to be identical; ergo, the nefer was the pandore.7 Although much has still to be said for the claim of identity, the theory has been abandoned.8 The pandore may be of Oriental origin, since it does not occur prior to the New Kingdom (c. 1570 B.C.).9 The sound-chests show the short oviform,10 the long oviform,11 and the periform,12 with a belly of skin or parchment perforated with one large and several smaller sound-holes. The strings were not attached to pegs as in the harps, but to tasselled tuning thongs. The pandore continued to be favoured until the Graeco-Roman periods, and the old Egyptian types are still popular in North

1 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pp. 235, 291; Kinsky, op. cit., p. 5.

2 Chappell, The History of Music (London, 1874), p. 399.

3 Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, figs. 53, 63.

4 J. G. Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 281; N. de G. Davies, The Rock Tombs of El Amarna, ii, pls. v, xxxiii; vi, pls. xxviii, xxxvi.

5 Revue musicale (1907), p. 337; Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 293; Sachs, Die Musikinstrumente, pls. 6-8. Hickmann, Catalogue, pls. xciii, ff.

6 Cf. Reese, op. cit., p. 7, and the terminology of Hickmann, Catalogue, p. 153.

7 This was Burney’s premise, which was accepted everywhere after Champollion (Dictionnaire égyptien, 1841) had laid it down that nefer was ‘une sorte de Théorbe’.

8 Scepticism began with Petrie (Medum, 1892, p. 29); he was followed by F. Ll. Griffith, N. de G. Davies, and Loret, until Petrie (The Wisdom of the Egyptians, London, 1940, pp. 59 ff.) himself gave the coup de grâce.

9 Cf. C. Sachs, History of Musical Instruments, p. 102.

10 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pl. xii; figs. 187–8, 191, 205, 222–3.

11 Wilkinson, ii, figs. 221, 229; N. E. Scott, ‘The Lute of the Singer Ḥar-Mosĕ’ in Bulletin: Metropolitan Museum of Art, ii (New York, 1944), pp. 159–63.

12 Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, p. 303; J. Capart, Documents pour servir à l’étude de l’art égyptien, ii (Paris, 1927–31), pl. 91.

B 3608

T

Page 319

274

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

Africa today under the name ganābir (sing. gunbrī),1 with two or three strings2 as in ancient Egypt.3

Looking back over nearly three millennia of iconographic material, in which instruments of music have been delineated so profusely with such great care, one cannot help being amazed by the diverse structures, the neatness of design, the clearness of detail, and the almost methodical portrayal of instrumental technique in ancient Egypt. In the wider use of these instruments, Egypt surpassed Mesopotamia a hundredfold and it is no wonder that Greece sang its praises.

THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF MUSIC

As we saw at the outset, what was envisaged by the Egyptians when they listened to music was affected by, or was subject to, the influence of heka’ or hīke (‘spell’). Like the ṣūfī of medieval Islam, or the Maulawīya dervish fraternity at Cairo today, the Egyptians of old did not hear ‘music’, but only ‘sounds’, and the latter were but a symbol of something else. One imagines that this interpretation obtained generally, even under purely festive conditions. Music, as we understand it, was simply one of the concomitant joys of life inseparable from floriage, feasting, and fragrance. A sidelight on this collateral appreciation is thrown by the sound-chest of the harp, which is sometimes fashioned to represent a lotus in bloom. Thus, before a note was struck, the instrument spelt ‘joy’. Yet in spite of these esoteric doctrines, the practice and technique of music seems to have been quite exoteric, seemingly very little different from our conceptions.

A few instrumental features deserve notice. The large plectrum for the cithara in use by the badāwī ‘Aa’mû must be compared with the delicate implement between the finger and the thumb of the graceful pandorist on a tomb picture,4 or the even smaller one, no larger than that of the modern mandoline, at another tomb.5 These plectra are attached to a cord lest they lost. Observe also the seeming affectation of the pandorists who occasionally strike the strings above the

1 Ibn Baṭṭûta, Tuhfat al-nuẓẓār, iv (Paris, 1853-9), p. 406. See also Farmer, ‘Tunbûr’ in the Encyclopaedia of Islām and paper in the Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, v (1930), pp. 26 ff.

2 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, i (London, 1931), pp. 39-49.

3 The Egyptians used up to four strings. See Champollion, op. cit. ii, pl. clix, and Wilkinson, op. cit. ii, pl. xii. For the ‘accordage’ of Egyptian stringed instruments see Hickmann, ‘Miscellanea musicologica’ in Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte, xlviii (Cairo, 1947), pp. 646 ff.

4 Erman, Life in Ancient Egypt, p. 214.

5 N. de G. Davies, The Tomb of Nakht at Thebes (New York, 1917), frontispiece and pp. 57 ff.

Page 320

PLATE IX

(a)

(b)

EGYPTIAN INSTRUMENTS

(a) Lower-chested harp and flute (18th Dynasty, 1570-1310 B.C.)

(b) Harp, lute, and double reed-pipe (c. 1475 B.C.)

Page 322

THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF MUSIC

275

sound-chest instead of at the bridge, in order to obtain a subdued

effect, a custom still practised in the Occident. Tricks or dexterities

were also indulged in, and a wall-painting in the British Museum

shows a female reed-piper fingering the dextra pipe with the left hand

and the sinistra pipe with the right.

The gradual development of the sound-chest in the harp shows

early recognition of the principle that loudness equates with ampli-

tude. The adoption of a taut skin, later parchment, as the belly of the

sound-chest of the harp and pandore, reveals the taste of the Egyp-

tians for what we should term a ‘banjo timbre’. The strings of differ-

ent lengths on their harps were the natural outcome of the adoption

in primitive times of the bow-harp, which we know existed in Mesopo-

tamia and Egypt in the third millennium B.C. Obviously these people

must have recognized that the length of a string, other things being

equal, determined the pitch of the sound, a principle which Pythagoras

is said to have introduced into Greece. Yet Helmholtz once remarked

that ‘if, as is possible, his [Pythagoras’s] knowledge was partly derived

from Egyptian priests, it is impossible to conjecture in what remote

antiquity this law was first known’.1 We have seen, however, from

the above dates, that this principle was recognized by both Mesopo-

tamia and Egypt at least two millennia before the dawn of Greek

civilization, and it was in these lands that Pythagoras had studied

both mathematics and musical theory.2

How much of this knowledge of the theory of sound, and its appli-

cation to vibrating string lengths and a column of air in tube

lengths was indigenous? Carl Engel once said: ‘There can scarcely be

any doubt that the Egyptians, like the Greeks, possessed written

dissertations on the theory of music.’3 In the absence of documents

this attitude is quite inadmissible. Yet it is pardonable for several

reasons. That there existed a Greek or Syriac version of a treatise on

the theory of music attributed to Hermes, which was known in an

Arabic translation during the Middle Ages, is hinted by Arabic and

Persian authorities;4 and while ‘Hermetic’ works were not necessarily

from the hand of Hermes, or the person to whom this name was

given—the label was attached to any anonymous Pythagorean, Neo-

Platonic, or similar writing—still, Hermes was a name with which to

conjure in the realm of music, since he was claimed as the ‘inventor

1 Sensations of Tone (London, 1895), p. 1.

2 Iamblichus, De vita Pythagorae, iv.

3 Op cit., p. 237.

4 Farmer, The Sources of Arabian Music (Bearsden, 1940), p. 29 (= Records of the

Glasgow Bibliographical Society (1939), vi.)

Page 323

276

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

of music’1 and the ‘first to observe the orderly arrangement of the

stars and the harmony of musical sounds and their natures’,2 which

was the very pivot of the religious conceptions of the ancient Egyp-

tians. However, no such books on the theory of music have come

down to us from ancient Egypt. Whether those ‘Egyptian books’

which were among the original Alexandrian libraries of Ptolemy

Philadelphus (309–246 B.C.) and Ptolemy Euergetes I (246–221 B.C.)

contained treatises on music, we have no knowledge. However, it is

clear enough that Egyptians had such knowledge of musical theory,

as we shall see presently.

Just as in ancient Mesopotamia apparently, music was thought to

belong to things that were anterior to experience. As a result of this

belief, each note of music not only had a particular cosmic value,3

but a magic potency,4 a circumstance which almost implies the

existence of modal formulas. It will be recalled that Plato’s Athenian

guest said when commenting on the educational system of the

Egyptians:5

What they ordained about music is right; and it deserves consideration

that they were able to make laws about things of this kind, firmly establish-

ing such melody as was fitted to rectify the perverseness of nature.

From the whole passage one may readily conclude that a modal

system was in vogue in Egypt which was approved by the temples and

so became a fixed and immutable law. We know that certain modes

or modal motives of a fixed character called nomoi (lit. ‘laws’) were

current in Greece, the strict use and interpretation of which were

rigorously enforced. By Plato’s time, the ‘pleasure-seeking’ crowd

were setting these at naught, and that was why Plato praised the

Egyptian practice of strict adherence to what was ‘lawful’ in music.

It must be admitted, however, that the tenets of Plato and the Egyp-

tians were prejudicial to the progress of art but, as the former says,

they were beneficial to the State, since where there was licence in

music there was likely to be laxity in morality.

What these modalities or modal motives were in ancient Egypt

there is no record, no more than there is of the nomoi of Greece. One

is inclined to believe that if music was regularized by the priests there

must have been a norm, since no canonical standard could have

1 Plutarch, Isis and Osiris, 352.

2 Diodorus Siculus, i. 16.

3 Maspero, Études de mythologie, i, p. 106.

4 Cumont, Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans (New York, 1912),

p. 30.

5 Laws, 657.

Page 324

THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF MUSIC

277

existed without rule. Yet rules can be observed without being written.

On the other hand, the rather late testimony of Clement of Alexandria

(second century A.D.) may not come amiss, for his authorities may

have been early.1 He says that among the innumerable books of the

'thrice greatest Hermes' were two for the 'Chanter' in the Egyptian

temple which dealt with hymns of the gods and the regulation of the

king's life.2 These may have contained modal directions, seeing that

such were obvious desiderata in temple chanting, and some of the art

remains show the lector-priest ('precentor') with such a book in his

hand.3

In recalling the view of Maspero that each note of music possessed

an inherent character,4 one is reminded of the assertion of pseudo-

Demetrius Phalerius (first century A.D.) which almost confirms the

above. He says: 'In Egypt, the priests hymn the gods through the

seven sounds [lit. "vowels"] in direct succession.'5 The perpetual

iconographical incidence in the early period of seven-stringed harps,

and the occasional occurrence of seven harpists and seven flautists

may have significance as cosmic affinity.6 Indeed the earliest hint of

music theory per se in ancient Egypt, which occurs in Dio Cassius

(c. A.D. 150-235), most certainly has an astrological bearing. He tells

us, in his usual credulous way, that it was the tetrachord which gave

birth to the names of the days of the week. A series of fourths, he

says, were taken from Saturn thus: E [Saturn] to A gave the Sun;

A to d gave the Moon; d to g gave Mars; g to c' gave Mercury;

c' to f' gave Jupiter; f' to b" gave Venus; and thus it was that the

names of the days of the week, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, and so

on, came to us. This recital, of what Dio Cassius calls the 'musical

connection with the arrangements of the heavens', would be hardly

worth the telling did he not state that the idea originated in Egypt,

'but is now found among all mankind, though its adoption has been

comparatively recent; at any rate the ancient Greeks never under-

stood it, so far as I am aware'.7 In any case, this proceeding is just

what one would expect from the Egyptian priests who, as Diodorus

Siculus affirms, were the first to make a scientific observation of the

stars.8 Indeed, if the origin of the mathematical arts,9 especially

geometry,10 is to be allowed to Egypt, and if a high skill in arithmetic11

1 Much of his other material can be traced to older sources.

2 Stromateis, vi. 4.

3 Erman, op. cit., pl. between pp. 320–1; Rosellini, op. cit., pl. cxxxii.

4 Op. cit. i, p. 106.

5 De Elocutione, 7.

6 Loret, Encyclopédie, I. ii, p. 25.

7 xxxvii. 18.

8 i. 50.

9 Aristotle, Metaphysics, 981.

10 Proclus, Commentary on Euclid, bk. i.

11 Plato, Laws, 819.

Page 325

278

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

is also to be counted to her credit, it would certainly be passing strange that the fourth group of the quadrivium should not have thriven as vigorously there also, as one is tempted to believe from the remarks of Philo Judaeus.1

From Dio Cassius it is clear that Egypt was conversant with the so-called Pythagorean system in the second century A.D., and there is no reason why it should not be assumed that it was practised there before the time of Pythagoras who was in statu pupillari possibly when he studied in this land c. 547–525 B.C. That Josephus says that the Egyptian temple harpists were using a trigōnon enarmonion in his day (first century A.D.) is no argument against this assumption.2

Musicologists have tried to decide this question by appeal to the actual instruments that have come down to us, and much patient research has been made in this territory. Victor Loret investigated the string lengths on harps, though these by themselves (as he recognized) are insufficient data;3 on the other hand, his contribution to the study of the digit holes on the woodwind is useful,4 as are the researches of his confrères in this field.5 Yet so far as one can see, the results lead us only into generalizations. Out of thirty-six instruments examined, dating from the 12th to the 22nd dynasty, only one could be classified as a ‘many-toned’ flute or reed-pipe, which the Onomasticon tells us the Egyptians possessed.6 Erich von Hornbostel took pains to measure the frets on a pandore which had been delineated with such, but again the results were practically negative.7

Though we cannot solve the problem of the theory of music in ancient Egypt, we may still be able to answer the vexed question: ‘Did harmony exist in ancient Egypt?’ Many writers have answered in the affirmative. James Baikie says that ‘it seems out of question to suppose that these aggregates of instruments were designed only to multiply the melody’, and so concludes that the existence of harmony is proved.8 To this one can only reply that we see the same ‘aggregates of instruments’ which are ‘multiplying the melody’ in every Arabic-speaking land from the Pillars of Hercules to the Tigris without a vestige of harmony, as we understand the term, discernible.

1 Moses, i. 23.

2 Cf. Nicomachus, in Meibom, ii, pp. 36, 38.

3 Loret, Encyclopédie, I. i, p. 24.

4 Ibid., pp. 17–20.

5 Hickmann, ‘Fabrikationsmarken an altägyptischen Blasinstrumenten’, Die Musikforschung, iii, pp. 241 ff.

6 Pollux, Onomasticon, iv, 10.

7 Handbuch der Physik, viii (Berlin, 1927), p. 435.

8 Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, ix (Edinburgh, 1917), pp. 33–34.

Page 326

THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF MUSIC 279

To more purpose are the studies made by Curt Sachs who, in further-

ance of his thesis of the pentatonic tuning of Mesopotamian harps,

has adopted similar criteria in his study of the technique of Egyptian

harpists. Taking seventeen representations of these sharpists, he found

that ‘seven are striking a fourth chord, five a fifth chord, and five an

octave chord; that is, taking for granted that the accordatura was

pentatonic’.1 From this it is argued that ‘simultaneous consonances’

and a ‘pentatonic accordance’ are indicated.

It has already been demonstrated:2 (1) that simultaneity cannot

be accepted as a criterion from the mere position of the digits on the

strings; and (2) that arguments for a pentatonic tuning based on the

assumptions of (1) are invalid. It is true that in many delineations of

Egyptian harpists we are confronted with hands stretched far apart

over the strings, a circumstance which prompts one to conclude that

the notes played, whether simultaneously or otherwise, must be far

apart in the intervallic sense. But what inferences are we to draw

from those pictures in which the hands are shown to be close to-

gether, with digits on adjacent strings? To draw positive conclusions

from either of these facts, especially when based on preconceived

notions of tuning, is extremely hazardous if not fallacious.

In conclusion it may be said that, while harpists in Egypt may have

sounded fourths, fifths, or octaves in playing, the practice was prob-

ably merely a heterophonic device, just as it is today in Islamic lands

where it has been practised since the time of Al-Kindi (d. c. A.D. 874)

if not earlier; but heterophony does not constitute harmony in the

accepted connotation of the term.3 The pentatonic system was pre-

Pythagorean. That the former persisted after the latter had been

established in Greece is quite understandable, but the heptatonic

principle must have prevailed in Egypt long before it was accepted

in Greece; at least that is what the Greeks themselves would lead us

to believe. In any case, in historic (post-Pythagorean) times there is

not the slightest indication in literature that there was any dissimi-

larity in this respect between the music of Egypt, Syria, and Greece.

THE LEGACY

Egyptians had a wide reputation as educators. Menecles, the his-

torian of Barca (third century B.C.), recorded that ‘the Alexandrians

were the teachers of all the Greeks and barbarians at a time when the

1 The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), pp. 82, 94.

2 See Chap. V, pp. 248-9, and Galpin, op. cit., p. 96.

3 Farmer, Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence (London, 1930), pp.

327-32; The Legacy of Islām (Oxford, 1931), p. 374.

Page 327

280

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

entire system of education had broken down by reason of the con-

tinually recurring disturbances which took place in the period of

Alexander's successors [post 323 B.C.]1 Herodotus (ca. 484–425 B.C.)

states that 'the Egyptians were the first to introduce solemn assem-

blies, processions, and litanies to the gods, all of which the Greeks

were taught by them'.2 Indeed, Diodorus Siculus would have us be-

lieve in even greater borrowings when he says that 'in general, . . . the

Greeks appropriated to themselves the most renowned of both Egyp-

tian heroes and gods'.3 By the third century B.C. the spread of the

cults of Isis and Serapis in Greece was vast.4 The craze was extended

to Rome where Tibullus the poet (fl. 54–19 B.C.) questioned the

efficacy of the 'brazen sistra'. Yet Isis worship found votaries by the

Rhine, the Danube, and the Seine, while even the Anglo-Saxons

recognized the 'Egyptian days'. With these Egyptian cults went the

liturgy, hymns, chanting, and above all the 'grief-compelling' sistra

of which Lucan writes,5 and it is from the western use of the latter

that so many specimens have been preserved. Indeed the Isis temples

in Europe continued a liturgy which was just as elaborate as in Egypt,6

since both sistra and tibiae were still in use, although Clement of

Alexandria adds harps (psalteria), cymbals, and drums.7

When the Greeks borrowed the Egyptian seššet they called it the

seistron which, in turn, became the Latin sistrum. Among the wood-

wind of Egypt, one or two found acceptance in Greece. Julius Pollux

says that the Greek giglaros was an Egyptian kind of aulos.8 Athenaeus

tells us much about Egyptian flutes and pipes and says, on the author-

ity of Juba, that 'the Egyptians call the monaulos an invention of

Osiris, just as they do the plagiaulos which is named the photinx . . .

which is peculiar to our country' [it is an Alexandrian who is speak-

ing].9 Later we are told that the 'lotus pipes' are what the Alexan-

drians call 'photinixes'; 'they are made of lotus, as it is called, which

is a wood that grows in Libya'.10 Yet Euripides, several centuries

earlier, reveals that the 'sweet-sounding lotus [flute]' was a sacred

instrument even in those days.11

There is also a slight suspicion that the 'foreign' harp used by the

Greeks under the name of phoinix may have been the Greek vocaliza-

1 Athenaeus, iv. 184.

2 ii. 58.

3 i. 23.

4 W. H. Roscher, Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie

(Leipzig, 1884–1901), s.v.

5 Pharsal. viii. 832.

6 Erman, A Handbook of Egyptian Religion (London, 1907), pp. 239–55.

7 Stromateis, ii. 4.

8 Onomasticon, iv. 10.

9 iv. 175.

10 Ibid. 182.

11 Bacchae, line 160.

Page 328

tion of the Egyptian bainit (= bint), rather than the accepted meaning

of Phoenician [harp].1 In Athenaeus, after the mention of several

'foreign' stringed instruments catalogued by Aristoxenus, the inter-

locutor referred to above boasts that 'the Alexandrians are well

acquainted with all these instruments', and says that a fellow citizen

of his, Alexander of Alexandria, 'gave a public recital with the in-

strument called the trigon, and sent all Rome into such a state of

music-madness that most Romans can repeat his tunes'.2 That Egyp-

tian musicians, like the Syrian, were to be found in both Greece and

Rome, is well evidenced. In later years this was partly due to the

persecution of the Alexandrians by Ptolemy VII, when 'not a few'

of them were sent into exile: philosophers, mathematicians, musicians,

and other men of skill in their professions, who 'instructed many

distinguished men' in the lands of their refuge, where they were the

means of bringing about a rejuvenation of culture which had fallen

to a low ebb.3

Indeed we must not forget that some of the greatest names in the

history of ancient music belong to Alexandrians and other Egyptians:

Ctesibius of Alexandria (fl. 246–221 B.C.) the presumed inventor of the

hydraulus, Claudius Ptolemy of Canopus (fl. A.D. 127–51) the famous

mathematician and musical theorist who wrote the weighty Harmonica,

Hero of Alexandria (fl. A.D. 150) who presented a later account of the

hydraulus in his Pneumatica, and Athenaeus of Naucratis (fl. A.D. 180–

  1. whose chatty Deipnosophistes tells so much about instruments of

music and other neglected musical lore.

All this may be but a scant indication of the musical heritage of

Egypt to the rest of the world, and it may come from even compara-

tively late sources; for when history strides over millennia, the earlier

footprints are not easily discernible. So, ultimately, one is compelled,

in the earlier period, to fall back on the general cultural impingement

of Egypt on Aegean civilization. As Breasted has shown, the Aegean

world was influenced by the Orient from two directions.4 Just as Asia

Minor was the cultural bridge connecting Greece with Mesopotamia,

so Crete, the centre of the Aegean, was the halfway house which

passed on Egyptian civilization to the Hellenic mainland. Of the

reality of the latter inducement we have ample evidence, and in the

sphere of music there is that archaic Cretan stoneware vase which

shows a harvest thanksgiving procession headed by a head-shaven

1 Victor Loret, Journal asiatique (juil.-août, 1889), p. 133.

2 Athenaeus, iv. 184.

3 Ibid., loc. cit.

4 J. H. Breasted, Ancient Times (New York, 1935), p. 287.

Page 329

282

THE MUSIC OF ANCIENT EGYPT

priest with sistrum in hand;1 the motive and craftsmanship tell their

own story. Alan J. B. Wace has said that it was from this impulse to

Cretan culture that sprang the Minoan and Mycenaean civilization,

‘from the ashes of which there rose Phoenix-like in the first millen-

nium B.C. the brilliance of Hellas, which was in its turn the forerunner

of European culture’.2

1 Breasted, Ancient Times, p. 285.

2 The Cambridge Ancient History, i (Cambridge, 1924), p. 591.

Page 330

VII

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

By CARL H. KRAELING and LUCETTA MOWRY

Among the world's books few can lay claim to greater importance for the history of music than the Bible. Its religious lyrics have not ceased to be sung in divine worship throughout the many centuries since they were written. The words of some of these lyrics, like many of the stories of the Bible, have been a source of inspiration for generations of composers, particularly in western Europe, down to modern times, and have found an echo also in the folk-songs of many lands. In the more recent past the book and its lyrics have come to be recognized by scholars as a treasure-house of information about the history of music in antiquity. Through the Old Testament it provides a partial record of the music of the Hebrew nation during the many centuries of its existence. Through the New Testament it gives at least a rudimentary acquaintance with the music of a nascent religious community, the early Christian Church, in the crucial formative years of its life.

LIMITATIONS OF BIBLICAL INFORMATION

As a source for the history of Hebrew music the Bible has certain limitations and presents certain problems. Being a sacred book, it provides only incidental witness to the range and character of Hebrew secular music. Being a collection of ancient literary documents, it gives the words of many ancient Hebrew religious lyrics—together with scattered references to the occasions on which they were performed, the instruments employed in accompaniment and even the names of some of the tunes used—but not the actual melodies to which the songs were sung. Since the Bible draws its materials from the entire range of Hebrew religious literature, and since in any such literature the use of the lyric form is by no means limited to the song proper, it is sometimes impossible to say whether a given composition was or was not intended to be sung. Lastly, since the documents are arranged according to categories—Law, Prophets, and Writings—and, what is more troublesome, are often either pseudonymous or composite or both, it is not always immediately evident to what

Page 331

284

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

particular period of Hebrew history the songs contained in them and

the historical information conveyed by them actually belong. Of the

limitations mentioned, some are today being surmounted with the

help of a growing body of information about the music of the ancient

Orient generally, while others are yielding to a fuller understanding

of the music of the later Synagogue. What is known about the music

of ancient Egypt, Babylon, and Persia—their lyrics, their instruments,

and even their melodies—has already been summarized (Chaps. V and

VI). The music of the Synagogue is discussed in the next chapter. As

to the problems mentioned, these may be said to have been brought

nearer to solution, at least in broadest outline, by the literary criticism

which in the last century has applied itself successively to the histori-

cal, the prophetic, and the lyric elements of the Biblical record, clari-

fying the stratification of the materials and determining the basic

forms and categories of Hebrew poetry. The most immediately per-

tinent of the critical works produced in the course of these labours,

together with those treating the music of the Bible directly, are listed

in the Bibliography (pp. 493–4).

THE NOMADIC PERIOD

Reconstructed with the help of literary criticism and comparative

materials, the history of Hebrew music develops in several stages,

beginning with the earliest days of Hebrew tribal life and extending

through the periods of the occupation of Palestine, the monarchy, the

exile, and the post-exilic community respectively. Throughout the

many centuries embraced in this development, music, and especially

song, played an important part both in the secular and in the religious

life of the Hebrew people, testifying to the high order of the nation's

intellectual gifts and to its emotional and aesthetic sensitivity. In the

earliest known phase of their history the Hebrews were apparently

nomads. To interpret correctly the nature and range of their music

in this period recourse must be had to the information supplied by

our knowledge of primitive migratory groups. What European travel-

lers in the Near East have reported about the music of the Bedouins

and what early Islamic authors tell us about the music of the Arabs

in the ‘period of ignorance’, is particularly helpful in this connexion.1

The chants which the nomadic Hebrews, like their successors, un-

doubtedly sang to while away the monotony of the long desert

1 See R. F. Burton, Pilgrimage to el-Medîna and Meccah (London, 1856), especially iii;

A. Musil, Kusejr’Amra (Vienna, 1907); H. St. John B. Philby, The Empty Quarter (London,

1933); Bertram Thomas, Arabia Felix (New York, 1932); H. G. Farmer, A History of

Arabian Music (London, 1929), pp. 1–9.

Page 332

THE NOMADIC PERIOD

285

marches, the songs they once had for special occasions in the life of

the individual and his family, were not remembered in the days of the

Biblical writers. But of the songs that are associated with the life of

the tribes and reflect the nomad’s bitter struggle against the forces of

nature and the claims of rival groups a few snatches have been pre-

served. One of these, connected with the desert travellers’ eternal

quest for the means of survival, is the Song of the Well:

Spring up, O well;

Sing ye unto it:

The princes digged the well,

The nobles of the people digged it,

By the direction of the lawgiver,

With their staves. (Num. xxi. 17-18.)

Probably sung in response to the invitation of the precentor by the

members of the clan as they approach a tribal watering-place, the

theme and refrain of the song has its counterpart in the repertory of

the Bedouins even today.1

Characteristic of the group movements of desert tribes are the shouts

associated with the Hebrew banner (‘The hand upon the throne [read:

the banner] of the Lord’, &c., Exod. xvii. 16), with the Ark (‘Rise

up, O Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered. . . .’ Num. x. 35-36),

and in a later period with individual leaders (‘For the Lord and for

Gideon!’, Jud. vii. 20). Such shouts are still used by Bedouin groups,

their set tonal forms making it possible to identify the tribe to which

the group belongs.2 More distinctly lyric in character are the songs of

vengeance and triumph preserved in the early historical books of the

Bible. It is the thirst for blood revenge that echoes in the Song of

Lamech:

Hear my voice,

Ye wives of Lamech;

Hearken unto my speech:

For I have slain a man to my wounding

And a young man to my hurt

If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold,

Truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold. (Gen. iv. 23-24.)

It is deliverance from the hand of the enemy that comes to expression

in the tumultuous refrain and invitation of the song of triumph that

1 Musil, op. cit., p. 9, quotes three examples, of which the simplest is the brief

couplet:

Spring, O water,

Flow in plenty.

2 See Musil, Arabia Petraea iii (Vienna, 1908), pp. 386 ff.

Page 333

286

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

Miriam sang and the women of the Hebrew camp repeated at the shore of the Red Sea:

Sing ye to the Lord,

For he hath triumphed gloriously;

The horse and his rider

Hath he thrown into the sea.

(Exod. xv. 21.)

Other lyrics of this type from the same period of Hebrew history were contained in the lost ‘Book of the Wars of the Lord’ mentioned in Num. xxi. 14, where a few lines are quoted.1 With Bedouin music in its simplest forms these remains of early Hebrew song share certain formal traits. They are marked by conciseness and simplicity and by strong accentual rhythm, implying that the tonal patterns in which they were rendered were brief and that the rendering was strident and staccato. At least in the case of Miriam’s song of triumph we hear that the singing was accompanied by the beating of percussion instruments (timbrels) and by rhythmic motions of the body.2

EARLY PALESTINIAN PERIOD

When in the course of the second millennium B.C. the Hebrew tribes made their way into Palestine, this was in all probability a matter of great consequence for the nature and development of their music. Here they began a new sedentary phase of their national history, entered upon a new agricultural form of life, and came into close contact with peoples of different racial stocks and varied social and cultural antecedents. Their first effort was naturally to make a place for themselves in the new land by conquest. In the circumstances they naturally perpetuated some of the musical forms belonging to their earlier repertory, especially the war songs. A particularly brilliant song of triumph from the period of the conquest of Canaan is the Song of Deborah (Judges v) containing the familiar lines:

The kings came and fought,

Then fought the kings of Canaan

In Taanach by the waters of Megiddo;

They took no gain of money.

They fought from heaven;

The stars in their courses fought against Sisera.

The river Kishon swept them away,

That ancient river, the river Kishon.

O my soul, thou hast trodden down strength.

(Judges v. 19–21.)

1 For the poetic material in the Pentateuch see J. A. Bewer, The Literature of the Old Testament (2nd ed., New York, 1933), pp. 1–20, and R. H. Pfeiffer, Introduction to the Old Testament (New York, 1941), pp. 271–81.

2 For Bedouin analogies see Bertram Thomas, op. cit., pp. 381–4.

Page 334

EARLY PALESTINIAN PERIOD

287

Its length and scope reveal an advance in the powers of sustained

composition, while the statement with which the prose writer intro-

duces the song suggests that different sections of it may have been

sung by singers of opposite sex (historically Deborah and Barak:

Judges v. 1), no doubt with the use of a large variety of tonal patterns.

Two verses quoted from the ‘Book of Yashar’ is all that remains of

an analogous song about the battle at Gibeon in the prose narrative

that has replaced it (Joshua x. 12–13).1

Echoes of the shorter, simpler lyrics celebrating the deeds of indi-

vidual heroes appear in the texts dealing with the period of the Judges

and the early monarchy—for instance, in the familiar couplet cele-

brating Samson’s victory over the Philistines:

With the jawbone of an ass, heaps upon heaps,

With the jaw of an ass have I slain a thousand men.

(Judges xv. 16.)

and in the song with which Saul was welcomed at his homecoming in

1 Sam. xviii. 7:

Saul hath slain his thousands

And David his ten thousands.

It will be noted in the last passage that the song welcoming the

triumphant hero was sung by the women with the accompaniment of

the dance and the use of various instruments.2

To the songs of war belong also those mourning the death of the

fallen hero, the dirges. As a literary form the dirge appears in many

parts of the Old Testament, but the first examples are from the period

of the early monarchy. The earliest, quoted from the ‘Book of Yashar’

(perhaps to be translated, ‘Book of Songs’), is the lament of David

for Saul and Jonathan, beginning with the words:

The beauty of Israel is slain upon thy high places

and containing the familiar refrain:

How are the mighty fallen.

(2 Sam. i. 19–27).

The second is the brief lament of David over Abner found in

2 Sam. iii. 33–34. The typical dirge, particularly in its later form, is

marked by a peculiar ‘limping rhythm’, which must have been re-

flected also in the melodic phrases to which such songs were sung.3

Originally the singers were probably the battle companions of the

1 For a related taunt song, perhaps from the period of the early monarchy, see

Num. xxi. 27–30.

2 Cf. Exod. xv. 20 and Judges xi. 34, where only percussion instruments are mentioned.

3 See infra, p. 295.

Page 335

288

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

deceased, the women accompanying the singing by sounds of wailing

and weeping (2 Sam. i. 24), but 2 Chron. xxxv. 25 suggests that in later

times lyrics lamenting the death of kings were performed publicly by

male and female singers.

With their entry into Canaan the Hebrews undoubtedly added to

their musical repertory the songs normally associated with the labours

and joys of agricultural life. How large was the variety of such songs

in the ancient Orient we learn from a cuneiform text giving an inven-

tory of the titles (or first lines) of songs, listing them under various

headings, including the songs of the workman, of the shepherd, songs

of love, of youth, &c., and specifying the instrument to which they

were sung, in the manner of the Biblical Psalter.1 Presumably the

Babylonian lyrics were not fundamentally different from the songs of

the shepherd and of the thresher, the texts of which are recorded in

ancient Egyptian inscriptions. Those that the Hebrews sang once they

had settled in Palestine were probably analogous to both. The joyous

celebration of the harvest in field and vineyard was proverbial for the

later writers of Hebrew religious literature (Isa. ix. 3; Jer. xxv. 30;

Ps. iv. 7, cxxvi. 6), and of sufficient importance for Isaiah in one of

his oracles against Moab to say:

And gladness is taken away,

And joy out of the plentiful field;

And in the vineyards there shall be no singing,

Neither shall there be shouting:

The treaders shall tread out no wine in their presses;

I have made their vintage shouting to cease. (Isa. xvi. 10.)

But the songs of the Hebrew vintner and of those treading the grapes

have long since disappeared, unless Isaiah has quoted or parodied a

harvest song in the familiar parable beginning with the words:

Now will I sing to my well-beloved

A song of my beloved touching his vineyard.

My well-beloved hath a vineyard

In a very fruitful hill. (Isa. v. 1.)

The ‘shouts’ of those who trod the grapes (Jer. xxv. 30) may well have

been single words repeated ad infinitum with the use of a simple

melodic phrase, like the hādandelli hādandōl still used by the Arabs

of Palestine.2

1 E. Ebeling, Keilschrifttexte aus Assur religiösen Inhalts, i (Leipzig, 1919), no. 158,

pp. 267–276; cf. S. Langdon, ‘Babylonian and Hebrew Musical Terms’, Journal of the

Royal Asiatic Society, 1 (1921), pp. 169–91; and Chap. V, p. 239.

2 G. Dalman, Palästinischer Diwan (Leipzig, 1901), p. 28.

Page 336

EARLY PALESTINIAN PERIOD

289

In Palestine the Hebrew tribes found also well-established shrines sacred to diverse Canaanite and Egyptian deities. How extensive was the use of music and particularly of song in such temples and how varied the repertory we learn from the hymns inscribed on the walls of Egyptian sanctuaries and from the lyric prayers, the liturgies, litanies, processionals, offertories, hymns, and penitential psalms preserved in the cuneiform texts of Babylonia. Very shortly after their entry into the land the Hebrews also created for themselves local shrines--for instance, at Shechem and Shiloh. It had long seemed probable that the practices of contemporary oriental cults gave a strong impetus to the development and use of the religious lyric among the Hebrews in Palestine. The suggestion was verified by the discovery at Ras Shamra in Syria of a body of epic texts reflecting a form of religious belief and observance allied to the Canaanite worship of Baal.1 The poems, including at least one hymn, are closely related to the Psalms of the Old Testament in vocabulary, phrases and even thought patterns, a relationship illustrated by the analogy between the Ugaritic

Behold thy enemies, O Baal;

Behold thy enemies thou shalt smite,

Behold thou shalt destroy thy foes.

and Psalm xcii. 9:

For, lo, thine enemies, O Lord,

For, lo, thine enemies shall perish;

All the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.2

The fact that such analogies appear in lyrics of quite different periods--the earliest of the extant Hebrew Psalms being a good deal later in date--makes the inference confirmed by them the more significant.

Upon their entry into Palestine the Hebrew tribes probably came to know and use also a larger variety of musical instruments, their types being essentially those portrayed in the art of Egypt and Babylonia. The passage in Gen. iv. 21 speaking of Jubal as the father of those who ‘handle the harp (kinnôr) and the pipe (‘ûgābh)’, is among the earliest to mention such instruments and, what is more important, suggests the appearance of families or guilds of professional musicians among the Hebrews at this time.3

1 See in general J. Obermann, Ugaritic Mythology (New Haven, 1948).

2 For the Ugaritic text see Syria, xvi (Paris, 1935), p. 32; the translation is that of J. H. Patton, in Canaanite Parallels in the Book of Psalms (Baltimore, 1944), p. 29, where a detailed comparison of the two bodies of material is made.

3 H. Gunkel, Genesis (3rd ed. Göttingen, 1910) ad loc., and others associate the passage with the nomadic phase of early Hebrew history.

B 3808

U

Page 337

290

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

MONARCHIC PERIOD

With the period of the monarchy, that is, from the beginning of the

first millennium B.C., the Hebrew nation takes its place among the

established peoples of the ancient Near East, the general pattern of

its life for upward of three centuries being approximately that of the

many lesser states lying between the great empires of Egypt and

Assyria. As the foci of its national life the court, the Temple, and the

large urban communities of the land are henceforth of outstanding

importance. Trade, the crafts, and the fine arts thrive, historical litera-

ture begins and music can scarcely have lagged far behind, though our

knowledge of its development remains very defective.

At the court, music played a well-defined and familiar role. Already

in the days of Saul we find the young David serving as musician to the

king, playing 'with his hand' and soothing the ruler's violent temper

(1 Sam. xix. 9).1 Tradition has it that he not only performed and com-

posed music—the entire Psalter being subsequently credited to him—

but that he also invented musical instruments (Amos vi. 5). What we

read in the Bible about instrumental music at the Hebrew court, and

what we learn incidentally about the vocal music performed there by

male and female singers (cf. 1 Kings x. 12; Amos viii. 3, reading

'songtresses' for 'songs', and for the later period Sirach ix. 4), serves

only to reflect the palace usage of the Orient as a whole. That this

usage should have spread from the court to the houses of the wealthy,

so that Amos (vi. 1–5) could speak of those 'that are at ease in Zion'

singing 'idle songs to the sound of the viol' (nebel, 'instrument',

probably a harp) is but natural.

Special events in the life of the court required and produced special

music. The accession of a new monarch was celebrated with cere-

monies involving the blowing of trumpets and the shouting of formulas

of acclamation (1 Kings i. 34). The analogy of the enthronement ritual

found in Babylonian texts suggests that songs were sung by the rejoic-

ing populace and by choirs of professional singers at the occasion.2

The Biblical Psalter contains a whole category of lyrics, the 'royal

psalms' so-called, that scholars have associated directly or indirectly

with events in the life of the court, with the enthronement of the king

1 On music in the life of oriental monarchy generally see B. Meissner, Babylonien

und Assyrien, i (Heidelberg, 1920), p. 331 and H. Frankfort, Kingship and the Gods

(Chicago, 1948), pp. 79–88. On the magical and curative power of music in the Biblical

sphere see H. Gressmann, Musik und Musikinstrumente im Alten Testament religions-

geschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten ii, 1 (Giesen, 1903), pp. 5–19.

2 Conveniently accessible in H. Gressmann, Altorientalische Texte und Bilder zum

alten Testament (2nd ed., Berlin, 1926), pp. 295–303.

Page 338

MONARCHIC PERIOD

291

or the anniversary of this event (Ps. xxi, lxxii, cx), with the marriage

of the king (Ps. xlv), with his departure for and victorious return

from war (Ps. xviii, xx, cliv. 1–11), and with his consecration (Ps. ci).

So noteworthy were the singers of the Hebrew court that Sennacherib

specifically mentions their removal to Nineveh in recording the booty

taken from King Hezekiah.1

MUSIC IN THE TEMPLE

Alongside the court, the Temple was all-important in the mon-

archic period as a centre of Hebrew music. Familiar in this connexion

are the stories of how David brought the Ark to Jerusalem with

dancing, with shouting, and with the sound of the trumpet (2 Sam.

vi. 14–15), and how Solomon dedicated the sanctuary in which it was

housed (1 Kings viii and 2 Chron. v. 11–14). The music of the Temple

ceremonial was undoubtedly not as elaborate in Solomonic times as

the Chronicler later imagined, but it probably followed the general

lines he develops, and was associated with both the regular morning

and evening sacrifice and with the important festivals of the religious

year. Apart from the blowing of trumpets (Num. x. 1–10, cf. Ps.

xcviii. 6) it consisted largely of the singing of religious lyrics and the

accompaniment of them with stringed instruments (cf. the protest of

Amos v. 23). As in the later period the musical part of the service

probably followed the performance of the sacrifices.2

Literary criticism having shown that most of the Psalter belongs to

a later period, individual psalms can no longer be used with absolute

confidence as sources for the knowledge of temple music in the

monarchic period. But types of lyrics tend to perpetuate themselves,

and recent typological studies of the Psalms make it possible at least

to say what kinds of lyrics were sung in the Solomonic Temple, and

with what occasions they can legitimately be associated.3

Biblical psalms connected with public rather than private devotions

give evidence of the continuous existence in later times of three im-

portant types, namely, songs of praise (e.g. Ps. cxlv, cxlvii, cxlviii, cl),

songs of petition (e.g. Ps. xliv, lxxiv, lxxix, lxxx, lxxxiii) and songs of

thanking (e.g. Ps. xxx, lxvi, cxvi, cxviii, cxxxviii). These types the

music of the Solomonic sanctuary can scarcely have lacked. Those

of the first type are properly hymns celebrating the majesty of the

deity, for instance, as the Lord of creation, have at least partial

1 Cf. D. D. Luckenbill, The Annals of Sennacherib (Chicago, 1924), p. 34.

2 Cf. in general W. O. E. Oesterley, Sacrifices in Ancient Israel (New York, 1937),

pp. 193–4, and I. Benzinger, Hebräische Archäologie (3rd ed., Leipzig, 1927), pp. 245–52.

3 See especially H. Gunkel, Einleitung in die Psalmen (Göttingen, 1933).

Page 339

292

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

analogies in the temple lyrics of the ancient Orient generally, and associate themselves naturally with the performance of the regular cult acts.1 The penitential psalms of petition, to which there are counterparts at present only in Babylonia, seem particularly adapted to the ritual of stated or especially instituted fast days of national calamity and repentance. The songs of thanksgiving have been connected with the performance of the thankoffering (cf. Jer. xxxiii. 11) and thus with the annual observance of one of the great Hebrew festivals, the Feast of Tabernacles, at which such offerings were commonly made.

Still other classes of the Biblical psalms give indications of their one-time use. The royal psalms, sung at occasions when special honour was done to the king, have already been mentioned. To these may be added a well-defined category of processional psalms (e.g. Ps. xxiv, xlviii, lxxxvii, xcv, c), also connected no doubt with festival usage. Still other songs (especially Ps. xlvii, xciii, xcvi-xcix) are believed to be associated with a festival supposed to have been celebrated annually at Jerusalem in the period of the First Temple, namely, that of the enthronement of the Lord upon his holy hill.2

In the period under discussion here the lyrics used in the Temple were probably sung largely by the priests themselves. Some may have had instrumental interludes, if that is what the enigmatic ‘Selah’ frequently found in the text of the Biblical psalms (cf., for example, Ps. iii. 2, 4, 8) really means, as the Greek translation diapsalma suggests. In others the congregation may have participated, but this was probably limited at first to the singing of a simple Amen or a Halleluiah, there being a goodly number of psalms beginning or ending with the latter formula (Ps. civ-cvi, cxi-cxiii, cxv-cxvii, cxxxv, cxlvi-cl). Songs connected with religious pilgrimage (e.g. Ps. lxxxiv, cxxii) were naturally sung by the pilgrim bands, but at least one processional psalm (Ps. xxiv) seems to have been rendered antiphonally. The ritual enacted with the use of this lyric involves the presence of a choir outside the Temple seeking entrance to the sacred precincts and being required by another to identify the object of its faith before being admitted. Twice repeated, the familiar exchange between the two groups runs as follows:

I Choir: Lift up your heads O ye gates;

Even lift them up, ye everlasting doors;

And the King of glory shall come in.

1 See S. Langdon, Sumerian and Babylonian Psalms (New York, 1909), and H. Zimmern, Babylonische Hymnen und Gebete (Leipzig, 1905).

2 See particularly S. Mowinckel, Psalmenstudien II (Christiania, 1922).

Page 340

MUSIC IN THE TEMPLE

II Choir: Who is this King of glory?

I Choir: The Lord of Hosts,

He is the King of glory. (Ps. xxiv. 9-10.)

So well established is the relation of Temple worship and music that the psalmists naturally associate the act of coming into the divine presence with that of 'making a joyful noise to him [the Lord] with psalms' (Ps. xcv. 2) and of singing 'praises unto Him with the timbrel (tōph) and harp (kinnôr)' (Ps. cxlix. 3).

THE PROPHETS AND MUSIC

Prophecy and the prophetic movement throw interesting sidelights on the association of religion and music in the period of the early Hebrew monarchy. Originally, it would seem, instrumental music was used to further prophetic inspiration and ecstasy. The prophets of whom Samuel spoke to David when telling him where to find his father's asses are described as having 'a psaltery (nebel) and a tabret (tōph), and a pipe (hālîl), and a harp (kinnôr), before them' (1 Sam. x. 5). Similarly Elisha, on being required to give an oracle to Jehoshaphat, demands of the king a minstrel, and we hear that when the minstrel played 'the hand of the Lord came upon Elisha and he prophesied' (2 Kings iii. 15). In the later period the relation between prophecy and music changes. Of the prophets whose oracles are recorded in the Bible none is known to have used instrumental music for inspirational purposes, and some like Amos reacted violently against even the use of song in the Temple (Amos v. 23). Yet many of the greatest among them used lyric forms in their pronouncements. This was not because the words were to be sung but because the forms were congenial to the thought to be conveyed.

Prophetic poems that can only be regarded as psalms and are sometimes explicitly described as such are to be found, for example, in Isa. xii. 1-3, 4-6; xxv. 1-5; xxvi. 1-6; xxvii. 2-11; xlviii. 20-21; lii. 7-10; Mic. vii. 8-10, 14-17, 18-20; Nah. i. 2-10 (acrostic). Hymns in praise of the deity appear, e.g. in Isa. xlii. 10-13; xliv. 23; one and the same pilgrimage lyric can be read in both Isa. ii. 2-4 and Mic. iv. 1-3, and a penitential psalm in Jer. xiv. 19-22. For those who in later times collected and codified the prophetic writings, the association of prophecy and the religious lyric was apparently so close that they incorporated in the prophetic books still other, later psalms, for example, those found in Hab. iii; Jonah ii. 3-10, and Isa. lxiii. 7-14. Another type of lyric that appears frequently in prophetic writings is the dirge or lamentation. Examples are to be found everywhere,

Page 341

294

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

for instance, in Amos v. 2–3; Isa. xiv. 4–21; Mic. i. 8–16; Jer. viii.

18–ix. 3; and of the later period in Isa. lvii. 1–6; Ezek. xix. 1–14. Of

the Book of Lamentations in the Biblical canon at least chapters two

and four are dirges belonging to the period under discussion. The

lyric form has in these instances undergone a literary development,

for the verses are so arranged as to form an alphabetic acrostic. For

our knowledge of the contemporary religious lyric of the Hebrews the

study of its echo in prophecy is of the utmost importance, providing

a check on the inferences drawn from the Psalter.

SECULAR MUSIC

What we know about the secular music of the urban and rural

communities of Palestine at this time is pitifully meagre. No doubt

it was analogous in type to that in use elsewhere and continued the

patterns of the previous period though on a richer scale. Amos’s

allusion to the association of feasts and song has already been men-

tioned (Amos viii. 10). Isaiah says of the inhabitants of Jerusalem

that ‘the harp (kinnôr) and the lute (nebhel) and the tabaret (tōph)

and the pipe (hālîl) and wine are in their feasts, but they regard not

the work of the Lord’ (Isa. v. 11–12). He counsels Tyre to follow the

example of the harlot, and to ‘take a harp (kinnôr), go about the

city, … make sweet melody, sing many songs’ (Isa. xxiii. 16). Songs of

the bridegroom and the bride are mentioned repeatedly, for instance

in Jer. vii. 34. Funerals had their own proper type of music. As in

the Orient generally, professional mourners, particularly women, ex-

pressed in wailing and in songs of lament the emotions of the bereaved

(e.g. Amos v. 16 and Jer. ix. 17–18, the latter apparently parodying

a song of lamentation). For all else, evidence is wanting save where

it can be conjectured that the prophets have on occasion parodied

secular songs, as in Isa. xxi. 11–12 and xxii. 13.

LYRICAL METRES

From the character and form of the lyric material preserved in the

Hebrew Bible as a whole it is possible to draw limited inferences about

the nature of the music used to accompany it. Hebrew poetry through-

out its earliest history is accentual. Its form is determined not by the

number of the syllables or the quantity of the vowels in a given

structural unit, but by the number of accented words the unit con-

tains. As for the basic structural unit, this may be regarded either as a

couplet of two lines or as a single poetic line divided into two halves

by a weak or a strong caesura. The number of accents to the half-

Page 342

LYRICAL METRES

295

couplet or half-line varies from two to four, with three the most

common. Normally the number of accents or beats is the same in

both halves of a couplet or line, the exception being the so-called

qinäh ‘metre’ used in dirges, where a combination of three and two

beats is commonly used, giving the structural unit its typical ‘limping’

or elegiac character. Halves of structural units commonly correspond

to each other also in sense, exhibiting what is known as ‘parallelism

of members’, a parallelism that may be synonymous, antithetical or

progressive (step-parallelism). The accentual pattern (3:3) of a single

structural unit whose halves exhibit synonymous parallelism may be

illustrated by the passage :

O cóme, let us síng unto the Lórd:

Let us make a joyful noíse to the róck of our salvátion

(Ps. xcv. 1.)

Most lyrics are made up of an unspecified number of such units, but

whether groups of these units may be said to form strophes is not

clear save in the case of the more stylized acrostic compositions.1

Using the information collected by those who have studied Oriental

and particularly Oriental Jewish music in its later phases, it is possible

to conjecture how lyrics constructed in this fashion were actually per-

formed. The basic elements were apparently not the single note and

the melodic phrase but a number of short patterns or motives each

developing a musical interval. More than one pattern was required

to sing a single line or couplet of a song, and all patterns must have

been subject to variation to allow for the changing number of un-

stressed syllables in each structural unit. In successive lines or couplets

the patterns could be repeated or changed, depending upon estab-

lished usage, changes in the subject matter of the lyric, and the extent

of the singer's repertory.2

INSTRUMENTS

At least in Biblical times Hebrew song was normally accompanied

by instrumental music (1 Kings x. 12; 1 Chron. xvi. 42 et al.). Of the

instruments themselves not a single example has as yet come to light,

and from the pre-Hellenistic period no native representation of a

Palestinian instrument survives.3 For our knowledge of the types used

we are therefore thrown back largely upon the names applied to them

1 For the structure of Hebrew poetry see, for example, S. R. Driver, An Introduction

to the Literature of the Old Testament (2nd ed., New York, 1913), pp. 366–7.

2 Cf. on this subject Curt Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World (New York,

1943), esp. pp. 71–102.

3 Asiatics bearing instruments of the type probably in use in Palestine are portrayed

in the art of the ancient Orient. See, for example, Meissner, op. cit., p. 332.

Page 343

296

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

in the Bible, upon the rendering of these names in the ancient versions

of the Biblical text,and upon probable analogies in the literature and

on the monuments of contemporary Oriental cultures. That there

should be a measure of uncertainty about the identity of some of

them is quite intelligible under the circumstances. In general it can

be said that the three basic types of instruments, string, wind, and

percussion, were each represented by one or more examples. Among

the stringed instruments the kinnôr, a lyre of the kind known to the

Greeks as the kithara, and the nebel, probably a harp with as many

as ten strings, were the oldest and most important. (The fact that the

latter was commonly rendered ‘psaltery’ in the ancient versions has

led to the confusing translation of the Hebrew nebel and kinnôr by

‘psaltery and harp’ in the King James Version, for example, in

Ps. cl. 3). Except for the shôphar, a ram’s or goat’s horn, and the

ḥăzôzērāh, a metal trumpet, both of which were blown rather than

played and that apparently only on special occasions, the important

wind instrument is the ḥālîl, probably a double oboe. Less frequently

mentioned is the ‘ugābh, apparently a vertical flute or pipe used mainly

in connexion with secular music. Percussion instruments include the

tōph, a tambourine or hand-drum, the zělzělîm or měziltayîm, that is

cymbals, and the měna‘ăn‘îm, probably a sistrum.1

AFTER THE CAPTIVITY

The destruction of the Temple and downfall of the Jewish state in

the sixth century B.C. marks a significant break in certain aspects at

least of the life of the Hebrew people. We cannot follow the exiles

themselves into Mesopotamia or reconstruct with any measure of

assurance that part of their life that would be of importance in the

present context. A gifted singer of the later period has described the

effect of the exile upon the musical life of the people in the immortal

words:

By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down,

Yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof.

For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song;

And they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying,

Sing us one of the songs of Zion.

How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?

(Ps. cxxxvii. 1-4.)

1 See in general Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940),

pp. 105–27; S. B. Finesinger, ‘Musical Instruments in the Old Testament’, Hebrew

Union College Annual, iii (Cincinnati, 1926), pp. 21–76; Max Wegner, Die Musik-

instrumente des alten Orients (Münster, 1950), pp. 38–44.

Page 344

AFTER THE CAPTIVITY

297

With the return of some of the exiles to Palestine in the Persian period, the corporate life of the Jewish community was resumed, albeit on a greatly reduced scale. The royal court, once the centre of so much of the nation's cultural life, was no more. Jerusalem, inhabited by but a small handful of folk, no longer boasted its urban luxury. Economic and political difficulties beset the community on every hand. Yet in Jerusalem a modest successor to the Temple of Solomon was erected, and with the High Priest assuming administrative responsibility for the direction of the community the Temple and the Law became the foci of Jewish religion and corporate life. It is natural, therefore, that the worship at the Temple and the effort of the individual to live in accordance with the demands of the Law serve as the occasion for the best known of the later developments in the history of Biblical and Jewish music. For the knowledge of these developments the work of the Chronicler and the Psalter are the outstanding sources.

Using the Chronicler's historical narrative as a source of information for conditions in his own day, it would appear that in the fourth century music played an even greater part in the worship at the Temple than in the earlier period. The vocal and the instrumental music at the shrine was now performed by families or guilds of professional musicians who associated themselves by descent with Heman, Asaph, and Jeduthun (and Korah), and thus ultimately with Levi, and claimed that they had been commissioned by none other than David (1 Chron. vi. 16–32; xv. 16–24; xvi. 41–42; 2 Chron. xx. 19). One of the Chronicler's sources gives their number as 4,000 (1 Chron. xxiii. 5), while another divides them into twelve courses of twenty-four persons each (1 Chron. xxv), the courses presumably taking turns at the services.1 That they were under the direction of a 'chief musician', as the traditional translation of the titles of certain Psalms (e.g. Ps. iv; see also the LXX of 1 Chron. xv. 22) would suggest, is extremely doubtful.2 About the 'psalteries (nĕbhālîm), harps (kinnōrôth) and cymbals (měziltāyîm)' that are commonly mentioned in Chronicles as the instruments accompanying their songs (e.g. 1 Chron. xv. 16), it is recalled in Mishnaic times that they were used in large numbers, but they can scarcely be said to have formed an 'orchestra'.3

Undoubtedly vocal and instrumental music had by this time been given a fixed place in the order of worship, but the descriptions of

1 For the point of view and the sources of the Chronicler's work cf. especially A. C. Welch, The Work of the Chronicler, Schweich Lectures for 1938 (London, 1939).

2 Cf. W. O. E. Oesterley, A Fresh Approach to the Psalms (New York, 1937), pp. 76–78.

3 Cf. Mishnah, ‘Arakhîn ii. 3, 5; Sukkah v. 4.

Page 345

298

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

services to be found in 2 Chron. xxix. 20-30 and Sirach i. 11-21

indicate only that the musical part followed the sacrificial, a fact

which the fuller Mishnaic description bears out (Tamid v. 6).1 Once

the place of music in the order of worship had been established, the

development of musical propria for the daily and the festival services

was inevitable. The Psalter itself reflects the beginning of this develop-

ment, the titles of Ps. xcii and xxx indicating that they were used on

the Sabbath and at the Feast of the Dedication of the Temple respec-

tively. Titles in the Greek Psalter associate still other Psalms each

with a day of the week.2 Mishnaic and Talmudic traditions embody-

ing the recollections of men who had participated in the worship at

the Second Temple and inferences drawn from the study of the liturgy

of the Synagogue suggest a much fuller development of lyric propria

than these scattered references demonstrate.3 That other prose ele-

ments of Scripture found a place even in the worship of the Temple

and that eventually they were rendered in musical form, seems en-

tirely likely.4 As for the psalms, the congregation probably partici-

pated by joining in refrains such as ‘For his mercy endureth for ever’

(Jer. xxxiii. 11; 2 Chron. vii. 3; Ps. cxviii, cxxxvi), and in doxologies

such as those now appended to the several ‘books’ of the Psalter

(Ps. xli. 13, lxxii. 18-19, lxxxix. 52, cvi. 48; see 1 Chron. xvi. 36).5

The establishment of the musicians’ guilds was of great importance

not only for the rendering but also for the composition of Jewish

music, the post-exilic period being that in which the largest propor-

tion of the lyrics contained in the Biblical Psalter was produced.

Various collections of psalms seem to have sprung up at this time,

each representing the repertoire of a different guild. These were

eventually merged to produce the Biblical Psalter, leaving only the

1 See further A. Z. Idelsohn, Jewish Music (New York, 1929), pp. 18-19.

2 In the order of their Hebrew numbering Ps. xxxviii and xcii are assigned in the LXX

to the Sabbath, and Ps. xxiv, xlviii, xciv, xciii, and xcii to the first, second, fourth, and

sixth days of the week. The full list for the entire week beginning with the first day is

given in the Mishnah (Tamid vii. 4) as follows: Ps. xxiv, xlviii, lxxxii, xciv, lxxxi, xciii,

xcii.

3 See, for example, the various Mishnaic tractates of the Seder Mo’ed, the extra-

canonical tractate Soferim of the Babylonian Talmud, and for the regular and festival

usage of the Synagogue I. Elbogen, Der jüdische Gottesdienst in seiner geschichtlichen

Entwicklung (Leipzig, 1913). Among the lyrics associated with festival usage, the Hallel

(Ps. cxiii-cxviii) was perhaps the first to be used regularly. Cf. the allusion to its use in

the home at Passover in Mark xiv. 26. The evidence is conveniently summarized by

Oesterley, op. cit., pp. 133-45.

4 See particularly H. St. J. Thackeray, The Septuagint and Jewish Worship, Schweich

Lectures of 1920 (2nd ed., London, 1923) and F. L. Cohen in the Jewish Encyclopedia s.v.

Cantillation.

5 For differences of usage in the responsive rendering of the Hallel (Ps. cxiii-cxviii) see

Mishnah, Soṭah v. 4.

Page 346

AFTER THE CAPTIVITY

299

divisions of the book and the titles ‘A Psalm of David’, ‘A Psalm of Korah’, &c., to testify to their existence.1

The titles of the Biblical Psalms yield yet further information about the music of the post-exilic Temple, though many of the expressions used in them are still quite obscure. Some of the titles appear to indicate what the song was used for: namely, for pilgrimage (e.g. Ps. cxx ff., A.V.: ‘Song of Degrees’), for instruction (?) (e.g. Ps. xxxii, A.V. ‘Maschil’), for atonement (?) (e.g. Ps. xvi, A.V.: ‘Michtam’) and for sickness (?) (e.g. Ps. v, A.V.: ‘upon Nehiloth’). Others suggest that the lyric was to be accompanied by one or more stringed instruments, so the expression binĕgînôth (e.g. Ps. iv, A.V.: ‘on Neginoth’) and the word mizmôr (e.g. Ps. iii, which, being translated psalmos in the Septuagint, has given rise to the name ‘Psalm’ applied to the lyrics of the Psalter generally). Still others give the names of the ‘tunes’ to which the lyrics were sung, as, for instance, ‘The Hind of the Morning’ (Ps. xxii, A.V.: Aijeleth Shahar), ‘Lilies’ (Ps. xlv, A.V.: ‘Shoshannim’), ‘The Dove of the Distant Terebinths (?)’ (Ps. lvi, A.V.: ‘Jonath-elem-rechokim’), and ‘Destroy not’ (Ps. lvii, A.V.: ‘Al-taschith’).2

Among the lyrics produced in the post-exilic period and included in the Biblical Psalter are many that answer to the religious needs of the individual rather than the congregation (e.g. Ps. xvi, xxiii, xxiv, xlii-xliii, cxvi). Appealing to God for succour from affliction and from the malice of the wicked ‘enemy’, these psalms express the individual’s abiding faith in God and in the moral order and indicate how deeply the prophetic spirit and the zeal for the Law had entered into the religious life of the common people. In the present context they are important because they show the religious lyric in transition from the sacrificial cult and its personnel to the private devotions of individuals and smaller groups, paving the way for important later developments.

What we know about the secular music of the Jewish community in the post-exilic period is at once more limited and more precise than in the preceding period. It is said that the returning exiles brought back household singers with them, both male and female (Ezra ii. 65; Neh. vii. 67), and of the services of such persons at festive occasions evidence is naturally not wanting in the later period (Sirach xxxii. 4–6; xlix. 1). Allusions to the songs of workers, such as the ploughman

1 On this see, for example, Oesterley, op. cit., pp. 58–67.

2 See, in general and on the obscure expressions not treated here, Oesterley, op. cit., pp. 75–115.

Page 347

300

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

(Sirach xxxviii. 25, 5 mg.) and the builder (Job xxxviii. 6–7), appear on occasion, but suggestions about the nature of any of these songs are lacking, in large measure because later prophecy and the apocalyptic that followed it abandoned increasingly the use of genre-forms taken from contemporary folk-song. At the same time the Bible supplies us with one whole book that is nothing more or less than a collection of secular lyrics, namely, the Song of Songs. Admitted to the canon on the strength of an allegorical interpretation of its material, it is in fact a compilation of love lyrics of the third century B.C., comparable in their passionate character and their flowery language to the love songs of ancient Egypt and contemporary Arabia.1

GRAECO-ROMAN PERIOD

In the Greek period, after the conquest of Alexander, new influences made themselves felt in Palestine. The Jews become familiar for the first time with the music of the Greek world and with the instruments in use in that area. Instructive in this connexion are the lists of instruments associated by Daniel with the performance of pagan acts of worship (iii. 5, 7, 10, 15). They not only provide new names for instruments of Oriental origin but list in addition at least three that are Greek, the qithārôs (Greek kitharis, a lyre), the pĕsanṭĕrîn (Greek psaltērion, a harp [?]), and the sûmpōnyāh (Greek symphonia: possibly a bagpipe). Josephus reports that Herod the Great, in instituting quinquennial games in honour of Augustus, caused Greek choral singers (Thymelici) to enter the competition (Antiquities xv. 8, 1 = § 270), following the example of the Hellenized monarchs and cities of the Orient generally.2

Yet the impact of these foreign instruments and modes upon Jewish music was anything but profound, at least in Palestine. Josephus himself describes the hostility with which Herod’s innovations were received, and Talmud and Midrash echo the opposition to Greek song, which intensified itself after the destruction of the Second Temple, when all instrumental music even for religious purposes was prohibited by the sages as a sign of national mourning.3 More important in this connexion is the reverence in which the writers of the Biblical lyrics were held (Sirach xliv. 5) and the fact that during the Greek and

1 On the Song of Songs see, for example, M. Jastrow, The Song of Songs (Philadelphia, 1921), and such general compends as that of R. H. Pfeiffer, op. cit., pp. 708–16.

2 Representations of Jewish instruments of the Roman period appear on Jewish coins. See, for example, G. F. Hill, British Museum: Catalogue of the Greek Coins of Palestine (London, 1914), pls. 33–38. Josephus’ remarks on Jewish musical instruments are given full consideration in the article by Finesinger cited on p. 296, n. 1.

3 See Idelsohn, op. cit., pp. 92–93; but cf. Chap. VIII, p. 315.

Page 348

GRAECO-ROMAN PERIOD

301

the Roman periods of Jewish history the production of religious lyrics continued, the vein being largely that of the older compositions. Examples of these later lyrics are to be found scattered about in the prophetic books of the Biblical canon, into which they were introduced by zealous editors, and in the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, e.g. Sirach 51, Judith 16, Tobit 13, The Song of the Three Children in the supplements to the Greek Daniel, and the Prayer of Manasses, written by a Greek Jew and preserved among the Canticles that were added to the Greek Psalter in later times.1 More important than any of these is the collection of Psalms produced in the middle of the first century B.C. and known as the Psalms of Solomon. In them the fervour of the post-exilic psalmists lives on, applying itself to the comfort and inspiration of pious folk who saw in the more secularized and pro-Roman elements of the community a threat to Jewish religious ideals and traditions.2 Recent manuscript discoveries in caves by the Dead Sea have provided elements of further collections of Psalms—Psalms of Thanksgiving—and other liturgical materials. They imitate the poetic writings of the Old Testament but represent part of the religious literature of a separate Jewish (Essene?) sect of the first century A.D.3 From them we should eventually learn more about the music and liturgy of Jewish groups looking toward the fulfilment of the eschatological hope.

SERVICES OF THE SYNAGOGUE

For the later history of Jewish music no one institution was of greater importance than the Synagogue. Whenever and wherever it began, it was already a regular feature of the scene both in Palestine and in the Dispersion in the first century of our era. By this time, too, the basic elements of its regular services of worship, comprising particularly the confessional shēma‘, the scripture lessons, and the Prayer (tĕphillāh), had undoubtedly been fixed.4 How music came to play a part in these communal services of worship is not entirely clear, though the natural presumption is that it was carried over

1 See Pfeiffer, op. cit., p. 632; on the apocryphal Baruch and its liturgical use, see the interesting suggestions of Thackeray, op. cit., pp. 80–111.

2 For the texts of the extra-canonical documents see R. H. Charles, Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1913).

3 See particularly E. L. Sukenik, Megillôth Genûzôth, i (Jerusalem, 1948) in Hebrew; A. Dupont-Sommer, The Dead Sea Scrolls (Oxford, 1952), pp. 69–78, and H. L. Ginsberg, ‘The Hebrew University Scrolls from the Sectarian Cache’, in Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 112 (Dec. 1948), pp. 19–23. Much of the material is as yet unpublished.

4 See in general Elbogen, op. cit., and W. O. E. Oesterley and G. H. Box, The Religion and Worship of the Synagogue (2nd ed. London, 1911).

Page 349

302

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

directly or indirectly from the worship of the Temple. Tradition has

it that Levites going in groups from the Temple services to those of

the Synagogue were the link between the music of the two institutions

(Babylonian Talmud, ‘Arakhîn 11b). Scholars have suggested that the

custom of groups of laymen in the several parts of Palestine to gather

for local worship synchronously with the performance of Temple

sacrifice may have contributed to the development.1 Of some im-

portance, it would seem, is the further fact that in the post-exilic

period the singing of psalms had become a part of the natural self-

expression of the devout people, whose institution the Synagogue

was. Paul singing hymns to God at midnight in Philippi (Acts xvi. 25),

and the Jews of Alexandria spending the night after the arrest of their

enemy Flaccus in the singing of hymns and songs of triumph (Philo,

In Flaccum 14, §§ 121–2), is a part of this larger picture. Precisely at

what points and in what form music entered into the worship of the

early Synagogue is quite uncertain. The religious individualism of

which the Synagogue was an expression undoubtedly led to the

development of varieties of usage in this matter, particularly in

the earliest period. Within the framework of the regular service it is the

doxological elements and the benedictions that would have lent them-

selves most readily to musical rendering, perhaps with melismatic

embellishments.2 To the essential nucleus of this type of service there

may often have been added the singing of stated or desired psalms,

festival usage being known to have involved such practice, above all

in the responsive singing of the Hallel (Ps. cxiii-cxviii).3 How the

Jewish communities of the Dispersion that used the Greek version of

the Scriptures sang their ‘hymns and songs’, whether according to the

old ‘tunes’, supposing that they could be adapted to a translated text,

or with the use of Greek modes, is, unfortunately, not known.4 Both

at home and abroad, the music of the early Synagogue was exclusively

vocal, whether because of opposition to pagan custom or as a sign

of mourning for the destruction of the Temple.

1 See, for example, Elbogen, op. cit., pp. 237–9. The reference is to the institution

known as that of the ma‘ămādôth, described in the Mishnah, Ta‘anîth iv. 2.

2 On the doxologies of Synagogue and Church cf. the article of E. Werner, ‘The

Doxology in Synagogue and Church, a liturgico-musical Study’, Hebrew Union College

Annual, xix (1945–6), pp. 276–351.

3 See in the Babylonian Talmud ‘Arakhîn 10a and Ta‘anîth 28b, where the dif-

ference between the number of times the Hallel is used each year in Palestine and

Babylonia is reported. The differences and the extent of the usage suggest ancient

practice.

4 In a familiar statement Clement of Alexandria compares the chanting of Hebrew

psalms as he had heard them to that of the Greek drinking song called Skolion (Paeda-

gogos ii. 4). Cf. on this see Werner, op. cit., pp. 333–5.

Page 350

( 303 )

MUSIC IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

As a source for our knowledge of the music of the early Christian Church the New Testament has its own limitations and problems. Far smaller in compass than the Old and lacking anything comparable to the Psalter, its documents are so closely associated with the practical purposes of the Christian missionary enterprise and so sharply delimited in their historical interest that they contain but little material bearing directly upon the question at issue here. Yet critical scholarship, applying itself to the study of the incidental information that does emerge, and keeping in mind both the background out of which Christianity came and the development of hymnody and liturgy in the later Church, has been able to reconstruct tentatively at least certain of the broader outlines of the use of music in the crucial formative years of the Christian movement. So far as we can tell the music of the early Church was almost entirely vocal, Christian usage following in this particular the practice of the Synagogue, in part for the same reasons.

Like that of John the Baptist who preceded him and those of others who followed, the movement initiated by Jesus was rooted in the traditional piety of the Jewish people, bringing the search for individual acceptability before God to renewed expression within the framework of the conviction that the religious hopes of the Prophets, so intensely meaningful to the people of his day, were about to come to fulfilment. From the outset, therefore, both movements were pitched at that high level of spiritual exaltation for which the use of lyric material and form was both natural and traditional. Jesus’s predecessor John, being of priestly descent, came of circles well acquainted with the music of the Temple. Jesus reflected more nearly the piety and worship of the Synagogue, and addressed himself commonly to the circles whose prayers for personal deliverance had been embodied in so many of the latest of the Biblical psalms, and who in the Psalter as in the New Testament are called ‘the poor’ (cf. Ps. lxxxvi. 1 and Matt. v. 3). It is not strange, in the circumstances, that echoes of the psalms appear in the sayings ascribed to him.

Both movements tended to create circles of faithful adherents in whose religious life certain of the elements of Jewish observance and the hope of an imminent deliverance were kept continually alive. To

1 On the Christian opposition to instrumental music and the exceptions to its disuse see J. Quasten, ‘Musik und Gesang in den Kulten der heidnischen Antike und der christlichen Frühzeit’, Liturgiegeschichtliche Quellen und Forschungen 25 (Münster, 1930), pp. 81–83, 103–10.

Page 351

304

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

what extent vocal music, particularly psalmody, played a part in this during the lifetime of the two founders is quite unknown, save for the incidental mention of the use of the Hallel (Ps. cxiii-cxviii) by Jesus and His disciples at Passover (Mark xiv. 26). From the period after the death of John the Baptist we possess a hymn of praise probably sung at one time by his disciples and later placed in the mouth of John's father Zacharias in the Baptist nativity story. The hymn is the canticle familiar to all as the Benedictus (Luke i. 68-79), beginning with the words so familiar also from the language of the Psalter:

Blessed be the Lord God of Israel;

For he hath visited and redeemed his people.1

Among the groups of disciples who in ever-increasing numbers perpetuated and proclaimed the faith in Jesus, the use of psalmody was from the outset of no small importance. The background for this is provided by what we hear in Acts of their constant participation in the worship of the Temple (e.g. Acts ii. 46; v. 12, 42) and of their attendance upon the services of the Synagogue (e.g. Acts vi. 9; ix. 2; xiii. 5, 14). When the Christian believers established themselves as independent groups, they frequently organized themselves after the Synagogue pattern (see e.g. Acts xiv. 23), and, judging by the structure of the later services of worship (see Justin Martyr, Apology, i. 65–67) that eventually produced the proanaphora of the Mass, they commonly followed the outline of Synagogue observance in at least one part of their worship.2 That psalmody played a part in Synagogue observance we have already seen. How important it was in the worship of the Christian communities throughout the ancient world can be judged from the statement of Paul, addressed to the Corinthians, 'when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm' (1 Cor. xiv. 26). In large part the psalms used in the churches must have been the lyrics of the Biblical Psalter, for among the books of the Old Testament quoted in the New none occurs more frequently than the Psalter itself.3 Yet there is good reason to believe that the exaltation associated with the belief in the coming deliverance, the imminent

1 See H. Gunkel, 'Die Lieder in der Kindheitsgeschichte Jesus bei Lukas', Festgabe von Fachgenossen und Freunden A. von Harnack zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht (Tübingen, 1921), esp. pp. 56–59. The assumption is that the hymn was composed in Aramaic.

2 See in general L. Duchesne, Christian Worship: its Origin and Evolution (5th ed., London, 1923), W. O. E. Oesterley, The Jewish Background of the Christian Liturgy (Oxford, 1925), and more recently C. W. Dugmore, The Influence of the Synagogue upon the Divine Office (London, 1944), pp. 71–89.

3 See H. B. Swete, An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek (2nd ed., Cambridge, 1914), pp. 383–4.

Page 352

MUSIC IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

305

return of Christ and the gift of the Spirit, produced from the outset new Christian lyrics analogous to those of the Biblical Psalter and the

Psalms of Solomon and rendered no doubt in the same fashion. Two early examples translated out of the original Aramaic are sometimes

said to be preserved in the Magnificat and the Nunc Dimittis of the Nativity story of Luke (i. 46–55; ii. 29–32), where they are placed in

the mouth of the Virgin Mary and the aged Simeon respectively.1 Both express in traditional language the confident assurance that

salvation has come to the distressed. The same confidence is reflected in the ‘song’ of thanksgiving that the writer of the Book of Revela-

tion has apparently translated and put into the mouth of those who have overcome ‘the beast’.

Great and marvellous are thy works,

Lord God Almighty;

Just and true are thy ways,

Thou King of Saints.

Who shall not fear thee, (O Lord) and glorify thy name?

For thou only art holy:

For all nations shall come

And worship before thee;

For thy judgments are made manifest. (Rev. xv. 3–4.)2

A peculiar feature of Gospel record may be of importance in this connexion. It is the fact that many of the sayings of Jesus reported

in the Synoptic Gospels, when turned back into the Aramaic in which they were spoken, give indication of possessing the accentual rhythm

typical of Hebrew poetry.3 Some of them, particularly those of a Sapiential character, may have been uttered in poetic form, others,

however, may have received their rhythmic form in the period before the existence of written Gospels, when they were recited in Christian

assemblies whether as ‘oracles’ or as parts of a new Law.

It is important even in this context to realize that the earliest places of specifically Christian worship were the ‘house-churches’ (Phile-

mon 2) as the earlier synagogues were ‘house-synagogues’.4 In this

1 See the article of Gunkel in the Festgabe . . . A. von Harnack previously cited. Harnack himself has suggested that the Magnificat was originally assigned to Elisabeth,

which might imply that it was a Baptist rather than a Christian lyric. See his article ‘Das Magnificat der Elisabet nebst einigen Bemerkungen zu Lk. 1. u. 2’, Sitzungsberichte der kgl. preuß. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1910 (Berlin, 1910), pp. 538–56.

2 On this and other ‘songs’ of Revelation see C. C. Torrey, Documents of the Primitive Church (New York, 1941), pp. 210–12.

3 See C. F. Burney, The Poetry of Our Lord (Oxford, 1925).

4 See the Christian Chapel and the earlier of the two synagogues at Dura-Europos (The Excavations at Dura-Europos, ed. M. I. Rostovtzef et al. Preliminary Report V (New Haven, 1934), pp. 238–85, and Preliminary Report VI (New Haven, 1936),

pp. 332–7 and pl. ix).

B 3608

X

Page 353

306

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

type of setting there were brought into close connexion not only the devotional practices of the family and the local religious community but also the observances which the Church shared with the Synagogue and those which it had in excess of the Synagogue, particularly Baptism and the Eucharist. That psalmody had come to play a part in the private life of the pious Jews of the post-exilic period has already been indicated, and this together with the use of prayers and blessings in the home was not without meaning for the development both of Christian usage and of Christian music.1 That it played a part also in the baptismal and eucharistic rites at very early times can be seen from the collection of Paul's letters, particularly in the familiar passages Col. iii. 16 and Eph. v. 19, where the Apostle encourages the faithful in the use of 'psalms, hymns and spiritual songs'. The immediate context of each of these passages is full of sacramental allusions, the one to Baptism, the other to the Eucharist.2

Of the part that music played in the baptismal practise of the early Palestinian Church we have no further evidence in the New Testament. For the Eucharist there may be information in Rev. v. 8–14 and xix. 1–7, where the Seer is describing acts of adoration in Heaven and seems to be paraphrasing and adapting forms actually in use in Christian circles.3 The worship in Rev. xix. 1–7 turns about the use of Alleluia hymns in which God is praised by the assembly of the saints and to which there are responses of 'Alleluia' and 'Amen'. The first begins with the words:

Alleluia!

Salvation and glory and honour and power unto the Lord our God: For true and righteous are his judgments.

(Rev. xix. 1.)

The second celebrates the imminent marriage of the Lamb:

Alleluia!

For the Lord God omnipotent reigneth. Let us be glad and rejoice, And give honour to him. For the marriage of the Lamb is come, And his wife hath made herself ready.

(Rev. xix. 6–7.)

1 Cf. on this Clement of Alexandria, Paedagogos 2, 4, and Tertullian, ad uxorem ii. 9, and Quasten, op. cit., pp. 158–79.

2 The categories 'psalms, hymns and spiritual songs (literally, odes)' are not to be distinguished too sharply from each other. 'Spiritual' as applied to odes may mean 'religious' in contra-distinction to 'secular', though it is the opinion of Paul that all the lyrics mentioned are 'inspired'. See, however, Vol II, Chap. I, p. 2.

3 See W. Bousset, Kyrios Christos (2nd ed., Göttingen, 1921), p. 235, F. J. Dölger, Sol Salutis 2nd ed. (Münster, 1925), p. 127, and G. B. Gray, Sacrifice in the Old Testament (Oxford, 1925), pp. 164–78. On liturgy in Rev. see Lucetta Mowry, 'Revelation 4–5 and Early Christian Liturgical Usage' in Journal of Biblical Literature, lxxi (1952), pp. 75–84.

Page 354

MUSIC IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

307

What seems to be parodied or quoted here is a Christian Hallel sung

in responsive form, as Ps. cxiii-cxviii were sung in Jewish usage. The

hymn follows the traditional pattern, praising God for his deliver-

ance, but substitutes for the association with the Passover meal that

with the marriage supper of the Lamb, thus adapting it to a eucharis-

tic context. With the type of eucharistic observance reflected in these

hymns we should perhaps connect also the Trisagion (Rev. iv. 8) and

the invocations ‘Hosannah to the God of David’ and ‘Maranatha’

that are reported in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (x. 6) and

1 Cor. xvi. 22, assuming that the exclamations were rendered melis-

matically.

The order of worship in Rev. v. 8–14 begins and ends with acts of

prostration by the Elders, and includes ‘songs’ sung by the Elders

and by the angelic host respectively, a doxology said by the multitude

of created beings, and a concluding Amen by the four beasts. The

general analogy to the order described in Sirach i. 16–21 is evident,

but the songs are of a new type, echoing the praise of the Lamb as in

the words:

Worthy art thou to take the book

And to open the seals thereof;

For thou wast slain and hast redeemed us to God

By thy blood

Out of every kindred and tongue

And people and nation

And hast made us unto our God

Kings and priests,

And we shall reign on the earth.

(Rev. v. 9–10.)

The form of the song, a declarative statement introduced by the word

‘Worthy’ (Greek: axios; Latin: dignus), is that of the acclamations

that formed part of the ceremonial of oriental courts and pagan

temples.1

THE CHURCH OUTSIDE PALESTINE

Except for the last item, the material discussed up to this point

illustrates the use of music by the Jewish-Christian churches that

existed in the earliest period of Church history, particularly in Pales-

tine. In these congregations we must assume there were in use not

only lyrics of the type familiar from the Old Testament and the post-

canonical literature of Judaism, but also the modes of performance

traditional in the Oriental, and particularly in the Jewish, environment.

1 See E. Peterson, ‘EIΣ ΘEOΣ (Göttingen, 1926), pp. 176–80.

Page 355

308

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

Perhaps the only departure from Jewish standards in these circles was added importance given to the inherited melismatic forms in which the Alleluias and other liturgical exclamations may have been sung. The spiritual exaltation characterizing the beginnings of the Christian movement makes such departures entirely intelligible. Once the Church had expanded beyond the Palestinian scene and particularly when it struck new roots in the Greek world, it inevitably developed musical forms of expression in keeping with other musical traditions. Precisely when this happened it is no longer possible to say. At pre-sent the earliest example of a Christian hymn using the quantitative metrical form of the Greeks is the hymn to Christ attached to the end of the Paedagogos of Clement of Alexandria, and the earliest known to have been sung according to the Greek tonal system is the Oxy-rhynchos hymn, recorded in a script of the third century A.D.1 Such hymns may have existed even in earlier days, but in the New Testament no trace of them exists and in general the development of Christian hymnody and liturgy follows other lines than those of specifically Greek music.

More important for the interpretation of early Christian music as reflected in the Bible are the mixed forms that developed from the fusion of oriental and Hellenistic elements. Of such fusions the hymns from Rev. v that use the acclamation form are one example. Since they can be translated without difficulty into Aramaic, they may have originated in Jewish-Christian communities of the Near East and have been rendered in the traditional way in spite of the slight departure from Jewish tradition that their form implies. An analogous departure in another direction is to be seen in the fragment of a confessional hymn preserved in 1 Tim. iii. 16:

[Who] was manifest in the flesh,

Justified in the Spirit,

Seen of angels,

Preached unto the Gentiles,

Believed on in the world,

Received up into glory.

Here the structure is still oriental, and the music to it must have been oriental, but the parallelism is that of Hellenistic rhetorical construction.2

1 Oxyrhynchus Papyri, ed. B. Grenfell and A. S. Hunt, xv (London, 1922), no. 1786. See Vol. II, p. 4.

2 On the passage cf. the commentary of M. Dibelius on 1 Timothy in H. Lietzmann, Handbuch zum Neuen Testament, ed. 2 (Tübingen, 1931), and E. Norden, Agnostos Theos (Berlin, 1923), pp. 254–63.

Page 356

THE CHURCH OUTSIDE PALESTINE

309

Another type of departure is to be found in the hymn quoted by

Paul in Phil. ii. 6-11. As read in the original Greek the lyric celebrat-

ing him who ‘emptied himself’ and took upon himself ‘the form of a

servant’ has a regularity of construction hardly to be imitated in

translation, and consists apparently of five stanzas of three lines

each.1 The absence of parallelism, the brevity and equality of the

lines and the stanza-form shows that we are dealing here with a

composition even more remote from Jewish psalmody. The lyric is

in fact a hymn to Christ as Kyrios or Lord, and hence quite out of

keeping with Jewish tradition. Yet the rhythm is not quantitative but

accentual, with three beats to the line, which suggests that it must

have been sung in oriental fashion and not in one of the Greek modes.

Similar mixed types also arising from the early Christian use of music

in the regular Lord’s Day services are perhaps to be found in the

Prologue of the Gospel of John and in a passage in Ignatius of

Antioch. That the Prologue of the Gospel of John particularly

John i. 1-18 embodies a hymn to the divine Logos constructed in the

same way as Phil. ii. 6-11, has long been evident.2 Less familiar,

perhaps, is the hymn that seems to be quoted by Ignatius in his

Epistle to the Ephesians vii. 2:

One is the Physician,

Both flesh and spirit,

Born yet not born,

God in man,

True life in death,

Both of Mary and of God,

First passible and then impassible,

Jesus Christ our Lord.3

Here again rhetorical parallelism and a hieratic style are to be noted,

but the rhythm continues in the accentual pattern of oriental lyric.

For the antecedents of the song represented by this type of lyric

it is useless to go either to native Greek or to Hebrew musical tradition.

The former could supply only the language and some associations

with the rhetorical structure, the other chiefly the accentual rhythm.

Even what is known about the music of the official state cults and the

1 See the commentary of E. Lohmeyer on Philippians in Meyer’s Kritisch-exegetischer

Kommentar über das Neue Testament (Göttingen, 1928).

2 See now the commentary of R. Bultmann on John in Meyer’s Kritisch-exegetischer

Kommentar über das Neue Testament (Göttingen, 1937) ad loc. and originally C. F.

Burney, The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel (Oxford, 1922), pp. 28–48.

3 See in particular W. Bousset, op. cit., pp. 254–5, and in general J. Kroll, ‘Die

christliche Hymnodik bis zu Klemens von Alexandrien’, Braunschweiger Vorlesungs-

verzeichnis 1921–1922 (Königsberg, 1921).

Page 357

310

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

mystery religions of Roman times, their hymns, their use of congregational responses and acclamations, does not supply complete parallels at the present time.1 Two facts should be noted in this connexion: first, that the accentual rhythm is not exclusively Hebrew or Jewish but common in all forms of early Semitic lyric poetry; and second, that, so far as our evidence goes, the theology of the mixed types of Christian hymns is to be associated less with Jewish-Christianity than with that of Churches in the Eastern provinces of the Roman empire. In all probability the antecedents of these hymns are to be found in the hellenized pagan cults of the Orient, particularly those of Syria. The importance of Kyrios, Lord, as the designation of Christ in many of them suggests the environment of the traditional ruler cults of the Orient in the form in which they and their liturgy were adapted to the services of the Hellenistic Diadochoi.2 The Ignatian hymn to Christ as the Physician suggests environment of the cult of Asclepius.3 Which, if any, of the peculiar features of such Oriental cult music had already come to play a part in the life of the Greek synagogues of the Dispersion at an earlier date, it is difficult to say, but certainly the Jews in the world at large must have modified their traditional music somewhat in order to sing their psalms in Greek, and may even have used acclamation formulas such as have been noted above in connexion with Rev. v.4 Whatever be true of the origin of these Christian hymns from the period of the New Testament writings, they already contain the germs for the development of certain types of Byzantine hymns, particularly of the kontakion,5 where, if Wellesz is right, tonic rhythm is still normative for the development of the melody and where groups of short sense lines arranged in strophes set forth the thought.6 In fact what has been said above about the use and rendering of acclamations and about cantillation suggests that all three of the major types of melodic formulation known in the cultural centres of the Orient had already come to expression in the

1 See in general, Quasten, op. cit., pp. 3-68, and the important article by Werner, ‘The Conflict between Hellenism and Judaism in the Music of the early Christian Church’, Hebrew Union College Annual, xx (1947), pp. 407–70, where the whole question is considered in its broadest outlines.

2 See above all W. Bousset, op. cit., and its sequel Jesus der Herr (Göttingen, 1916).

3 See E. J. and L. Edelstein, Asclepius, 2 vols. (Baltimore, 1945), where the use of hymns is amply documented.

4 Especially in the ‘doxa’ form cf. Peterson, op. cit., pp. 224–7, and Werner, ‘The Doxplogy in Synagogue and Church: a liturgico-musical Study’.

5 But see also Vol. II, p. 2 i.

6 See particularly Wellesz, ‘Aufgaben und Probleme auf dem Gebiet der byzantinischen und orientalischen Kirchenmusik’, Liturgiegeschichtliche Forschungen, Heft 6 (Münster, 1923), esp. pp. 39–60, and A History of Byzantine Music and Hymnography (Oxford, 1949), p. 154.

Page 358

THE CHURCH OUTSIDE PALESTINE

311

life of the early Christian communities of the Near East before they can

be documented in the liturgical literature of the established Church.1

EARLY CHRISTIAN ANTIPHONY

Certain aspects of the early Christian use of music can be under-

stood only if brief consideration is given also to the immediately post-

Biblical period in the life of the Church. Relatively unimportant in

this connexion are the statements of Pliny the Younger, that ‘on a

stated day they [the Christians] were accustomed to gather before

daybreak and to utter responsively a song (?) to Christ as to a god’

(Epistulae x. 96: ‘quod essent soliti stato die ante lucem convenire

carmenque Christo quasi deo dicere secum invicem’), and that of the

Church historian Socrates (b. about A.D. 380) suggesting that Ignatius,

the bishop of Antioch in Syria, introduced antiphonal singing into

the Church as the result of a vision (Historia Ecclesiastica, vi. 8).2

The former may be less significant than is often imagined because it

must be interpreted in the light of the terminology of a Roman official

and need not say more than that a formula (be it prayer, invocation

or song) was used.3 The latter ascribes to a specific person at a late

time a practice so common in both Judaism and in the responses of

pagan cults that no special revelation is needed for its inauguration

in Christian usage.

GNOSTIC HYMNS

Far more important in this connexion is the evidence for the

existence of large collections of lyrics produced in the second and

third centuries of our era by the Christians and Gnostics of Syria

and the Near East. Of these collections two have in recent years

become directly available, namely, the Odes of Solomon and the

Manichean Psalter.3 Other collections known largely or entirely

from hearsay include those of Valentinus, Bardesanes, and Marcion,

the two last mentioned representing attempts to create a substitute

for the Biblical Psalter.4 Individual lyrics by unknown authors are

1 See Wellesz, ‘Aufgaben und Probleme’, p. 15, and Vol. II, pp. 2–3.

2 Cf. Dölger, op. cit., pp. 103–36.

3 For the former see R. Harris and A. Mingana, The Odes and Psalms of Solomon,

2 vols. (Manchester, 1920), for the latter C. R. C. Allberry, A Manichean Psalm Book

(Stuttgart, 1938), representing the Psalter of the Coptic Manichean Church. The biblio-

graphical information about the extensive body of Manichean hymns from Turkestan

published largely by the Prussian Academy will be found in C. F. Burkitt, The Religion

of the Manichees (Cambridge, 1925), and in the article of H. J. Polotsky s.v. Manichäismus

in Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopädie, Supplementband vi (Stuttgart, 1935).

4 The sources of information are listed in A. v. Harnack, Geschichte der altchristlichen

Litteratur bis Eusebius (Leipzig, 1893), esp. pp. 171, 183, 185–6, 197.

Page 359

312

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

scattered about in the apocryphal acts (e.g. the Syriac Acts of Thomas) or quoted in the writings of the anti-heretical Fathers (e.g. Hippolytus).1 The material is important in this connexion for various reasons. It shows how extensive was the production of Christian hymns in the early days, particularly in the regions of Syria, Egypt, and Mesopotamia, and thus shows in proper perspective the scattered fragments surviving from the period of the New Testament writings, when the fires of inspiration burned even brighter. It indicates that in addition to the groups producing hymns of the mixed types already examined, there were those for which the traditional forms of Hebrew and Jewish psalmody continued to be largely normative (for instance, the authors of the Odes of Solomon). Finally, it exhibits for the period before Ephraem and Narsai the use of the isosyllabic form of verse construction, a form that subsequently became of the utmost importance for Byzantine hymnody.2 This form, in which the traditional accentual rhythm is adapted to the use of homogeneous melodic patterns by a principle of line construction that demands an equal number of syllables (seven or eight) in each line, appears in the extra-Biblical material for the first time in the poems of Bardesanes (A.D. 222). It should be noted, however, that this principle of construction is not necessarily a late feature of oriental poetry, but possibly indigenous in the tradition of Aramaic literature, as an inscription of the fifth century B.C. has been taken to imply. Indeed, it has been suggested that the Lord's Prayer, in its Lukan form, was arranged in accordance with the principle in question.3

In both its parts, therefore, the Bible is a treasure-house of information for the knowledge of ancient music. The limitation that it shares with so much ancient literature, namely, the absence of specific information about the musical patterns used by singers and instrumentalists, is offset by the strategic nature of the lyric material it has preserved. This material in its developing form and character provides the bridge that connects the music of the ancient Orient with that of the Middle Ages and thus with that of the western world.

1 For the former see Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles, ed. W. Wright, ii (Edinburgh, 1871), pp. 150–1, 238–45 (Hymn of the Soul), 245–51; for the latter see Hippolytus, Philosophou-mena v. 5 (Naasene Hymn).

2 See also Vol. II, pp. 19–32.

3 C. C. Torrey, ‘A possible metrical Original of the Lord's Prayer’, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie xxviii (Straßburg, 1913), pp. 312–17. The Aramaic inscription referred to is that of the Carpentras Stele, an epitaph of four double lines, each half line containing seven syllables, after the manner of the later lyrics. For the text cf. G. A. Cooke, A Text-Book of North-Semitic Inscriptions (Oxford, 1903), pp. 205–6.

Page 360

VIII

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

By Eric Werner

INTRODUCTION

Three facts have to be taken into account in attempting to give a survey of the music of post-Biblical Judaism. In the first place the subject is connected with the religious and political history of a wandering people whose migrations brought it into contact with all the nations of Europe and most of the nations of Asia. Secondly, the liturgical music of Judaism, from the destruction of the Temple (A.D. 70) onward, had to take a place between genuine folk-lore and art music, yet—until the nineteenth century—belonged to neither of these categories. The Jewish centres of the Orient, however, underwent a decline to a kind of standardized folk-lore, a change from a genuine flexibility to an almost petrified musical system. In this respect the Oriental Jews are in no way different from their Christian and Moslem neighbours since they, too, show no signs of musical development since the ninth century (Christian) and the fourteenth century (Moslem) respectively. It remained the particular excellence of European culture that its churches were always and everywhere capable of stimulating, assimilating, and integrating new attitudes of thought, and this is equally true of European Jewry. Since such living development is completely absent in the Near East, we shall have to distinguish between the history of Oriental and European Synagogue music from the tenth century onward. Finally, the growth of Synagogal music is intrinsically connected with the development and gradual change of Jewish liturgy. Therefore it will be necessary to refer to the field of liturgy.

We must bear in mind that the natural heritage of the Temple's levitical psalmody constituted the nucleus around which the new synagogal chant evolved. Here it is important to decide whether the original performance of the psalms was metrical. This question, however, can be answered only if we know for certain that parts of the Scriptures, e.g. the psalms or certain hymnical passages of the Pentateuch, were understood or performed metrically. Unfortunately, we are far from any definite answer to the problem. E. Sievers, D. H.

Page 361

314

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

Müller, and many other scholars have most carefully investigated the possibility of a metrical structure in the Scriptures; but their results are vague, controversial, and by no means conclusive. Only two facts stand out as established principles: (1) the parallelism of Scriptural poetry, sometimes called ‘dichotomical structure’, which divides almost every poetical sentence into two parts, similar or antithetic in thought; (2) strophic structure, especially in certain prophetic ‘songs’, e.g. Isa. v; Jer. xxxii; Ezek. xxxvii, to name only three of the most famous instances. Nevertheless, quite a few famous historians such as Josephus, Jerome, and other Church Fathers insist that certain passages of Scripture were written in strictly metrical form. Again, since there is no positive evidence for metrical performance of Scripture, we have to assume that the music of the Temple was non-metrical, i.e. polyrhythmic, and that its rhythm was entirely dependent upon the accentuation of the text. The principle of parallelism has to be considered the origin of all dichotomic systems of performance, such as the responsorium, the strict antiphona and the responsorial psalmody, both in Judaism and in Christianity. The strophic or refrain structure may have played a part in the ‘Songs of Ascent’ (Pss. 120–34), although modern scholars have replaced the old Christian concept of these psalmi graduum by either the Talmudic interpretation of ‘Songs of Pilgrimage’ or by a reference to a rhetorical device of these psalms, the so-called anadi-plosis (chain-figure).

CONTINUITY OF JEWISH TRADITION

It is of paramount importance to the study of Jewish music to determine whether its tradition was continuous in general, or interrupted by the frequent disasters and migrations that have been the lot of the Jewish people. If we search for an answer to this question in other fields of Jewish civilization—philosophy, theology, literature—the continuity of its development is assured beyond doubt. Yet some writers have drawn a sharp line across the musical tradition of Judaism, separating the culture of ‘the Bible from that of the Ghetto’.1 Only if there had been a danger of a radical rupture at any time after the fall of the Temple, should we have reason to assume a new untraditional beginning. The historical facts, however, speak unequivocally. The Temple services were regularly attended by divi-

1 Notably L. Saminsky in The Music of the Bible and of the Ghetto (New York, 1937), which is a collection of more or less aphoristic and apodictic statements, most of them without historical foundation.

Page 362

CONTINUITY OF JEWISH TRADITION

315

sions of 'standing-men' from the various provinces of Palestine.

These men had a synagogue in the Temple area at their disposal—the

so-called 'Hall of Stones' (Luc. ii. 46; Acts iii. 11; v. 12)—and

the priests were entitled to conduct the services there, thus link-

ing the rural communities with the tradition of the central sanctuary.

One of the numerous personalities who endeavoured to transmit the

priestly music to the representatives of the synagogue was R. Joshua

ben Hananya who regularly taught the 'stand-up men ' the institutions

and the customs of the Temple. He was a famous singer and used to

go from the orchestra of the Temple to the 'Hall of Stones' in order

to conduct the daily service.1 As a disciple of Johannan ben Zakkai,

he assisted him in saving as much as possible of the Temple ritual

that it might be rendered in the academy of Jamnia.2 He and his

contemporaries formed a strong link in the chain of tradition at a

most critical time. Apart from these historical facts there are suffi-

cient data to warrant the integrity of the musical tradition of Judaism.

Comparisons with the music of the early Church will presently con-

firm our conclusions.

Rabbinic sources explain the strict prohibition of any instrumental

music in the Synagogue as an expression of mourning for the loss of

the Temple and land, but the present writer has been able to show

that a certain animosity against all instrumental music existed well

before the fall of the Temple. It seems that this enmity towards in-

strumental music was a defence against the musical and orgiastic

mystery cults in which Syrian and Mesopotamian Jews not infre-

quently participated.3 Similar utterances came from Philo and one

of the Judaeo-Christian Sybilles, to name only two chief witnesses.

The primitive Christian community held the same view, as we know

from apostolic and post-apostolic literature: instrumental music was

thought unfit for religious services; the Christian sources are quite

outspoken in their condemnation of instrumental performances. Ori-

ginally, only song was considered worthy of direct approach to the

Divinity.4

In the two centres of Jewry, Palestine and Babylonia, the liturgy

of the Synagogue was gradually developed, and—with it—its music.

1 Talmud, 'Arakhin 11b.

2 Talmud, Succa 53a.

3 Cf. Eric Werner, 'The Conflict between Hellenism and Judaism in the Music of the

Early Church', in Hebrew Union College Annual (1947), pp. 416-20.

4 Clement of Alexandria, Paedagogus ii. 4; Arnobius, Adversus Nationes in Corp.

Script. Eccl. Lat. 4, 270; also Gregory Nazianzen, Oratio 5, 25, in Patrologia Graeca

xxxv, col. 708/9.

Page 363

316

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

If we compare the constituents of early Synagogue and early Church music, we arrive at the following parallelisms:

Synagogue

Cantillation of Scriptures

Psalmody

Post-Biblical Prayers

Melismatic Songs

Church

Cantillation of Scriptures

Psalmody

Christian Prayers (chanted)

Hymns

Melismatic Songs

These elements, however, which at first seem to be identical, diverged considerably as regards musical performance as early as the late second or early third century. Not only did the hymn attain a predominant position in the Church, especially in Eastern Christianity, contrary to the rite of the Synagogue where the hymn-forms were not introduced until the sixth century, but even the Christian performance of psalmody differed to a certain degree from the Jewish.

Whereas in the Synagogue the precentor was the sole musical functionary until the sixth or seventh century the churches early developed choral singing, especially with the development of monasticism. On the other hand, a good deal of the musical tradition of the Synagogue was taken over and preserved by the Church.

CANTILLATION OF SCRIPTURE

The attitude of the early Synagogue is clearly expressed in the Talmudic statement: 'Whosoever reads Scripture without chant . . . to him the Scriptural word is applicable "I gave them laws and they heeded them not".1 The term 'cantillation of Scripture' is very complex, however, inasmuch as there is more than one system of Scriptural chant in existence. Not only do the various parts of the Bible employ different cantillation, according to their liturgical function, but considerable divergences of regional traditions play a certain part. Thus, the Yemenite Jews, whose tradition is by far the oldest, use a cantillation much at variance with the central and west European Jews (Ashkenazim), and these again differ from the former Spanish Israelites (Sephardim).2

Notwithstanding these variants, a common source is clearly discernible, the more so since the cantillation was to a certain extent regulated by three successive systems of Jewish ecphonetic notation.

1

Megilla 32a.

2

Cf. A. Z. Idelsohn, Thesaurus of Hebrew Oriental Melodies, i (Leipzig, 1914), preface; also R. Lachmann, The Cantillation of the Jews of Djerba (Jerusalem, 1940).

Page 364

CANTILLATION OF SCRIPTURE

317

The first system (Proto-Palestinian) arose in the fifth century A.D. in

Palestine; it was closely akin to the ancient Syrian system of notation

consisting only of dots and a few strokes.1 The second system emerged

in Babylon during the late seventh and eighth centuries and used an

intricate method of indicating the respective accents by the first letters

of their names. The third, which finally proved best, was the system

of the Tiberian Masorites which came into being during the ninth and

tenth centuries; it shows a remarkable similarity to that of the early

Byzantine ecphonetic signs.2 A few illustrations may be cited:

Byzantine signs

Hebrew signs

́ Bareia

̄ Kathiste

̌ Kremaste

ē Hypokrisis

́ Legarmeh

̄ Zarqa

̌ Shofar munach

Ḗ Shalshelet

Since the rabbinic sources of the early fifth century already show

familiarity with the existence of primitive accents, we may assume

that the ecphonetic systems arose in a country equally accessible to

Byzantines, Palestinians, and Syrians: possibly north-west Syria. It

should be noted in passing that the primary purpose of these accents

was not the fixation of Scriptural cantillation but the minutely perfect

punctuation and syntactic division of the Biblical text. Then the

newly created accents were adjusted to the older cantillation. That

such a cantillation existed in the early Christian liturgies of Jeru-

salem and Antioch, we know from various sources, chiefly from

the Western Church Fathers. Thus we can explain why certain

phrases of the Roman tonus lectionis, which is based upon Western

neums, bear a remarkable resemblance to Jewish motives of cantil-

lation such as:

Ex. 297

The Half Close

1 See Vol. II, pp. 10, 11.

2 See my 'Preliminary Notes on Catholic and Jewish Musical Punctuation' in

Hebrew Union College Annual, xv (1940), also Idelsohn, Jewish Music in its Historical

Development (New York, 1929), pp. 35–71.

Page 365

318

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

The Full Stop

Jewish versions

Central European

Yemenites

Syrian

Roman versions

Punctus versus

Tonus antiquus

Close of First Psalm Tone

PSALM TONES

The same resemblance exists between the psalm tones; yet here a distinction must be made. Formerly, some scholars thought the Jewish and Gregorian psalm tones to be remnants of the Temple liturgy. This cannot be so, since, hardly 150 years after the fall of the Temple, the Rabbis disagreed concerning the Temple's singing of the Hallel (Ps. 113–18), the most solemn and revered collection of psalms.1 All possible forms of responsorial and antiphonal performance are mentioned in those passages of the Talmud where the Hallel is discussed. The close kinship between Oriental Jewish psalmody, on the one hand, and Gregorian, Armenian, and Syrian psalm tones, on the other, impels us to assume that it was not the Temple, but the early Synagogue which served as a common source. The strict parallelism, the fundamental principle of Hebrew poetry, was carefully preserved in all the translations of the Bible. This dichotomic structure led to the establishment of such typically psalmodic practices as responses, antiphons, refrain-psalms, &c., all of which were taken over by the Churches. The claims of the Church Fathers that Basilius, or Flavian and Diodorus invented antiphonal singing, must be understood to mean that these men introduced such forms in the Gentile Church,2 for in Judaism they were well known for centuries before the rise of Christianity.3 It is instructive to compare a few psalm tones of the Roman Church with Jewish psalmody4 (Ex. 298).

AUTONOMOUS MELODY

While in Scriptural cantillation and psalmody the melismata are restricted to the function of musical punctuation, marking the caesura

1 Talmud, Sota 30b.

2 See also Chap. VII, p. 311, and Vol. II, Chap. I, p. 6.

3 Cf. Tosefta, ed. Zuckermandel (Halberstadt, 1881), pp. 303f.; also Mekhilta, ed. Weiss (Vienna, 1865), pp. 42 ff.

4 For the ancient version of Tonus IV see P. Wagner, Gregorianische Formenlehre (1921), p. 90; for the example from the Lamentations, see ibid., p. 239. See also The History of Music in Sound (H.M.V.), i, side 14.

Page 366

Ex. 298

Jewish version

Psalm-Tones

Roman version

II. Tonus

IV. Tonus (ancient version)

VI. Tonus

VIII. Tonus

tr...

Tonus Peregrinus

Ps.114 in Easter-time

Lamentations

Yemenite

Tonus solemnis lectionis (Conclusio)

Solemn Chant of Scripture on High Holy days

Page 367

320

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

in the middle, and the punctus at the end of the verse, in another

form the melisma assumes full domination. As distinct from cantilla-

tion and psalmody, where syntactic and tonic accents determine the

flow, the melody is autonomous in the ecstatic 'Alleluias' and inde-

pendent of the word. Even Isidore of Seville knew of the synagogal

origin of the Alleluia songs when he said 'Laudes, hoc est Alleluia

canere canticum est Hebraeorum'.1 ('The praises, that is to say the

singing of Alleluia, is a song of the Hebrews.') It is in the Alleluias

that the principle of the formula plays the most important part.

These formulas were ancient melodic patterns which were linked

together and, through constant repetition, often assumed the func-

tion and character of leading-motives. They represent the first in-

stances of absolute or 'autonomous' music. A few examples will

illustrate this point (Ex. 299).

Neither the Synagogue nor the early Church had professional

choirs. In the first three centuries the sheliach tsibbur (messenger of

the congregation), an honorary precentor, performed all parts of the

liturgy, supported by the worshippers' responses. The early Church

used the terms psalmista, lector, anagnostes, or cantor for the same

office. Only when monasticism attained its influence in the Church

did trained monastic choruses become the rule in larger Christian

communities. In Judaism this development took place about two

centuries later—650–700—when the students of the talmudic aca-

demies of Babylon formed standing choruses.2 It was perhaps

an imitation of the successful Christian practice, although the

Babylonian Jews were not in direct contact with any Christian

Church.

THE MODES OF SYNAGOGUE MUSIC

No use of chordal or harmonic construction is made by the peoples

of the Near East. Unison melody is prevalent, occasionally em-

bellished by instrumental accompaniment parallel to the chief melodic

line with improvised ornaments (heterophony). The melodic lines of

all Near Eastern music are based upon modes. Judaism, too, uses

certain stereotyped melodic patterns which, by repetition and associa-

tion, crystallized in the course of centuries into a system of modes.

1 Isidorus Hisp. De offic. i. 13, in Patrologia Latina 83, col. 750. See also Vol. II, p. 5,

and Werner, 'The Attitude of the Church Fathers to Hebrew Psalmody', in Review of

Religion (1943), pp. 339–52.

2 Cf. Nathan ha-Babli in Neubauer, Medieval Jewish Chroniclers, ii (Oxford, 1887–95),

pp. 83–88; also my study 'The Doxology in Synagogue and Church', Hebrew Union

College Annual, xix (1946), p. 307, where a full translation is given.

Page 368

Ex. 299

I.

(a) Priestly blessing of Yemenite Jews

(b) Hosianna (Idelsohn I., p.81)

(c) Babylonian Jews (Thrice Holy; Idelsohn II.101)

(d) Tractus, Vinea enim (P.Wagner, III. 360)

B 3608

II.

(a) Yemenite Jews

(b) Central European Jews, daily Prayer-mode

(c) Te Deum (Antiphonale Ambros.)

Page 369

322

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

Why eight modes seem to have constituted the generally accepted number is not quite clear; indeed, this question is so obscure that it will be useful to explore the origin of modality as much or as little as the scope of this chapter will permit.

The eight modes, which we know from Christian theorists (Okto-echos), in spite of their octave-like arrangement, have nothing to do with the system of a scale reaching through the interval of an octave.

The earliest accessible sources demonstrate that the conception of eight modes originated with the calendar. Hittite and Babylonian documents allude to this,1 but the connexion becomes quite clear when we bear in mind that the Syro-Byzantine Oktoechos was originally a group of hymns to be sung on the eight Sundays following Pentecost.

This reminds one strongly of the ancient Pentacontade calendar of the Near East in which eight holidays were inserted into a period of fifty days (seven weeks plus one day).

This calendar system is still, to a certain extent, linked to the Oktoechos of the Nestorian and Armenian Churches.

In Judaism the musical modes have undergone numerous developments.

First, as we see from the superscriptions and structures of some psalms, they were an esoteric secret of the priestly cast.

Thus Psalm vi bears the inscription "'al ha-shemit"; the usual interpretation of shemit, meaning 'the eighth', has led to translations such as 'tunes in the octave' or 'upon an instrument with eight strings'.

Neither of these explanations is satisfactory when compared with an old rabbinic interpretation quoted by Saadya Gaon, the great Jewish philosopher of the ninth and tenth centuries.

He writes:

This is a hymn . . . in which the regular singers of the Temple were ordered to praise God in the eighth lahan [Arabic for 'mode' or 'melodic pattern'].

The expression "'al ha-shemit" demonstrates that the Levites used eight modes, so that each time one of their regular groups executed one mode.2

In the Middle Ages, the Jewish modes were understood as hermeneutic devices to attune the human soul to the various emotions

1 Cf. my study on 'The oldest sources of Octave and Oktoechos', Acta Musicologica, xx (1948), p. 1, where all pertinent documents are quoted.

2 Saadya Gaon's psalm-translation, ed. S. H. Margulies (Breslau, 1884), pp. 11, 13, 30 (Arabic and German); also H. Ewald, Über die Arabisch geschriehenen Werke prehensively treated by H. G. Farmer in Saadya Gaon and Music (London, 1943), pp. 78 ff, and by E. Werner and I. Sonne, 'Philosophy and Theory of Music in Judaeo-Arabic Literature', Hebrew Union College Annual, xvi (1941 and 1943), pp. 295 ff. and E. Werner, 'The Origin of the 8 Modes', ibid. (1948), pp. 220 ff.

Page 370

THE MODES OF SYNAGOGUE MUSIC

323

expressed in the Scriptural and post-Biblical poetry of Judaism. Then

they deteriorated to musical habits, especially when they became imita-

tions of Arab modes or melodies (lahanim). In the eighteenth century

they were all but forgotten, but in the middle of the nineteenth cen-

tury they were rediscovered and reconsidered. In these circumstances

their tradition is by no means free from corruption, and authenticity

can be claimed for only a few. Owing to constant repetition and asso-

ciation with certain liturgical types, the Jewish modes have today a

strong hermeneutic function, linking special prayer-types with special

modes. This practice is, of course, one of the numerous instances

of the 'ethos doctrine' of music, common to all ancient nations.

Ex. 300

Structure of Jewish Prayer-Modes

(a) Skeleton 'Magen Aboth'-mode (MA)

(b) 'Ahaba Rabba' (AR) supratonal.

(c) AR subtonal.

(d) Phrygian Plagal. A

(e) Modified Lydian mode (Daniel-mode of Spanish-Arab Jews)

(f) 'Adonai Molokh'-mode (A M), mixolydian, supratonal

(g) A M subtonal (Ha-El Psalm-tone)

These modes are not of the scale character that was imposed upon

the modes of the Church by medieval theorists; they are rather models

of melodic types. In addition to these chief modes, we find, especially

Page 371

324

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

among the Oriental Jews, a number of other patterns that do not

easily submit to systematization.1

One of these modes, the main strain of Hellenistic psalmody,

was especially singled out by the Church Father Clement of Alex-

andria in the beginning of the third century. Clement praises the

majestic psalmody of the Alexandrian Jews, which was chanted in

the Tropos Spondeiakos.2 We have exact descriptions of this ancient

mode by Plutarch and other writers; and it can still be traced in

the oldest strata of Jewish, Byzantine, and Roman Catholic chant.3

THE INFLUENCE OF POETRY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF

SYNAGOGUE MUSIC

So long as Biblical diction, and its more or less conscious imitation,

dominated the language of the Jewish liturgy, the musical forms and

expressions remained unchanged—even in the first bitter centuries of

exile and of conflict with conquering Christianity. But gradually a

momentous change took place in both the substance and the execu-

tion of the liturgy. A new poetic style came into being in which metre

and rhyme played important roles. The beginnings of this develop-

ment reach back to the fifth century. It was caused by external as well

as by internal circumstances. Since Justinian’s novella 146 prohibited

the Deuterosis (Bible exegesis, Midrashic homily) in the Jewish ser-

vice, Jewry tried to circumvent this law by introducing didactic

homiletic poetry as substitutes for exegesis within the liturgy. That

this was no more than an apparent cause is demonstrated by the fact

that after the Arab conquest of Palestine and Babylonia (636-50) the

Jews, liberated from Byzantine oppression, retained and even greatly

expanded the new poetic insertions of the liturgy. We are bound to

assume that Jewry simply followed the trend of the times, for the

contemporary Syrian and Byzantine poems, too, are chiefly based

upon homilies and are often nothing more than versified sermons or

exegeses. Metrically, the early piyyutim (liturgical poems) show a

variety of systems; sometimes accents are counted (homotony), some-

times syllables, as in Syriac poetry, sometimes even words. After the

tenth century the Arab system of metre was generally adopted. More

difficult is the problem of rhyme, for neither the Byzantines nor the

1 Cf. especially the motives cited in Lachmann, op. cit., pp. 98 ff.; also R. Lach’s

remarks in ‘Die vergleichende Musikwissenschaft’, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der

Wissenschaften (Vienna, c. 1924), pp. 35 ff., 89.

2 Clement of Alexandria, Paedagogus, ii, ch. iv (P.G. 8, col. 445).

3 Cf. my study ‘The Attitude of the Church Fathers to Hebrew Psalmody’, Review

of Religion (1943), esp. pp. 349–52.

Page 372

INFLUENCE OF POETRY ON SYNAOGUE MUSIC

Syrians ever cultivated it very much except for some forms of rhymed prose; perhaps Jewry adopted pre-Islamic or even Mandaic patterns of rhyme, although they were rather primitive.

The introduction of metre and rhyme brought with it a new type of music, not necessarily a periodic symmetrical one like the occi- dental music of the eighteenth century, but a kind of chant which could no longer disregard the principles of metre and strophic struc- ture. The first pioneer to take cognizance of these changes seems to have been Rabbi Jehudai Gaon (c. 720), of whom it is said that 'the early Hazanim (cantors) learned musical tradition from him as he had learned it from his teachers for many generations'.1 He championed the cause of new poetry and even ruled that a blind cantor might be appointed if his other qualifications recommended him. He also advocated the ternary form a-b-a in liturgical rubrics where the prayer opens and closes with a eulogy. They should be chanted to the same tune, 'but the middle should be sung differently, yet not too differently'. Jehudai Gaon, therefore, must be considered as the father of Jewish musical tradition. Shortly before his time, the great Pales- tinian poets Jannai and Jose ben Jose show, both in form and con- tent, remarkable resemblance to contemporary Byzantine hymnody, especially to the form of the kontakion.2

After the Arab conquest of Babylonia, Palestine, and Spain (711), the Jews of the Iberian Peninsula established themselves in a close symbiosis with the ruling Arab class. The centuries between 800 and 1400 witnessed the rise of a magnificent Jewish culture in Spain which furthered religion, philosophy, literature, and music. The famous poet and philosopher of the Spanish epoch, Jehudah Halevi (1085- 1141), discusses unfavourably the aspects of metrical music in his philosophical work The Kuzari, still preferring the old psalmodic improvising chant. Others, however, felt differently. A number of Spanish-Jewish writers, mostly writing in Arabic, showed consider- ably more understanding of the musical demands of metrical poetry; they even stressed the value of musical theory and championed its study. Their attitude represented a mixture of Arabic, Biblical, and Greek ideas.3 Few musical documents, however, have been preserved.

1 Cf. my study on Doxology in Hebrew Union College Annual, xix (1946), pp. 303 ff.

2 The greatest Byzantine melodos, Romanus, was of Jewish parentage, and his famous hymn upon the reappearance of Christ and the Day of Judgement is based upon various rabbinic homilies. Cf. Vol. II, p. 21, and E. Wellesz, 'Melito's Homily' in Journal of Theological Studies, Oxford (1943, pp. 46 ff.

3 Cf. Werner and Sonne 'Philosophy and Theory of Music in Judaeo-Arabic litera- ture', Hebrew Union College Annual, xvi (1941 and 1943), pp. 262 ff; also Curt Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, pp. 277 ff.

Page 373

326

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

In contrast with the conservative Arab-inspired philosophy of the writers are the sources which have come down to us either by oral tradition or through documents. From the fourteenth century on, Judaeo-Spanish folk-songs, as well as artistic accomplishments, show a distinct inclination to follow Western and not Arab leadership, all efforts of the music department of the Baghdad Bait-hikma (Academy) notwithstanding.

The oldest known manuscript of Hebrew music1 is a ‘Eulogy on the Death of Moses’, written in Lombardic neums on a four-line stave. Its text, and probably also its music, was composed by an otherwise unknown Amr ibn Sah’l who lived in the eleventh century; it is very much akin to the more elaborate types of Gregorian chant.1

Ex. 301

It seems to have originated at Ravenna, or thereabouts, although it was found in Cairo; the neums are Italian in type, while the Hebrew script shows Byzantine influence. Shortly after the thirteenth century the Italian Jews became the recognized leaders in poetry and music; their position was strengthened by the catastrophe that befell Spanish Jewry at the end of the fifteenth century.

THE MUSIC OF ITALIAN JEWRY

Generally speaking, the chant of the Synagogue had remained on

1 The manuscript is in possession of the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York; (E. Adler Collection No. 4096). Cf. my paper, ‘The Oldest Sources of Synagogal Chant’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, xvi (1947), pp. 225-32.

Page 374

THE MUSIC OF ITALIAN JEWRY

327

the level of stylized folk-song for many centuries. The transition from

this position to the sphere of genuine art music began with the early

Renaissance and was nowhere so well developed as in Italy. There we

find composers of Jewish extraction as early as the end of the fifteenth

century. The papal court of Leo X (1513-21) employed two Jewish

musicians, Jacobo Sansecondo, probably the model of Raphael's

'Apollo on Mount Parnassus', and Giovanni Maria, who, in honour

of the Pope, surnamed himself 'De Medicis'.1 The sixteenth century

produced a score of outstanding Jewish musicians in Italy, of whom

we need mention only those who were employed at the court of the

Dukes of Mantua, the very liberal Gonzagas: Abramo dall' Arpa

Ebreo, Isacchino Massarano, David da Civita and Allegro Porto.

Something must be said here about the institution of the ghetto and

its influence upon the music of the Jews within its boundaries. The

Fourth Lateran Council, under Pope Innocent III (1215), decided to

segregate the Jews as radically as possible from their Christian fellow-

citizens, placing them in ghetti that were closed at nightfall; social or

professional intercourse with the Christian community was virtually

made impossible. It took about two generations before these decrees

were fully implemented, but from about 1270 until the end of the

fifteenth century these stern rules were faithfully carried out, and the

Franciscan and Dominican monks did everything in their power to

excite the Christians against Jewry.2 Under these circumstances, while

every tradition was loyally preserved in the ghetti, there was no

opportunity for development. The ghetto did not kill Judaism and its

institutions, but it condemned them to stagnation and gradual

deterioration. No wonder, then, that we hear practically nothing of

music from Jewish sources. Italian archives, however, especially those

of Venice, Leghorn, and Ferrara contain a number of decrees against

Jewish music-teachers.3

At the end of the sixteenth century two remarkable persons ap-

peared who at one stroke raised synagogal music to the high standard

of contemporary music in general. They were Rabbi Leon da Modena

and his protégé Solomone de' Rossi il Ebreo. The initiative came from

the Rabbi, one of the most colourful personalities of Jewish history.

Brilliant and profound scholar, anonymous pamphleteer against him-

self, composer and conductor, prolific writer, gambler, alchemist: in

short, a jack of twenty-six trades (which he carefully enumerated), he

1 Cf. E. Birnbaum, Jüdische Musiker am Hof von Mantua (Vienna, 1893).

2 Cf. Cecil Roth, The History of the Jews in Italy (Philadelphia, 1946), pp. 177 ff.

3 A. F. Rio, Les Quatre martyrs (Paris, 1856), p. 34.

Page 375

328

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

founded a musical society in the ghetto of Venice. One of his (con-

verted) disciples Giulio Morosini has given us a good description of

Modena's Accademia musicale.1 The practice of having double choirs,

then popular in Venice, was introduced to the ghetto by Rabbi da

Modena, and he himself composed a series of such choral pieces in the

style of the Gabrielis.2 But his chief merit is that he induced Salomone

de' Rossi to compose a book of synagogal music. This work, The Songs

of Solomon, published by Bragadin (Venice, 1620), contains thirty-odd

choral pieces ranging from three to eight parts. The style of his music

resembles that of Monteverdi, with whom Rossi collaborated in the

composition of the sacred drama Maddalena (Sacra rappresentazione

di Giov. Batt. Andreini Fiorentino) in 1617. Rossi's synagogue com-

positions contain few, if any, traces of Jewish tradition. While they

are of enchanting beauty and religious spirit, they remained alien to

the customary vein of synagogue song, which was the main reason

why they fell rapidly into oblivion after Modena's death.3

The merit of having preserved portions of old Jewish music belongs

not to a Jew but to the Christian Benedetto Marcello (1686–1739), a

Venetian noble. He collected twelve traditional chants of Venetian

Jewry and used them as canti fermi in his composition of the first

fifty Psalms, the famous Estro poetico-armonico, published in 1724–7.

This attempt to revive ancient psalm tunes must be considered a late

aftermath of former humanistic efforts to explore scientifically the

fields of Scripture, Hebrew history, and literature. It has been shown

independently by Idelsohn and myself that a number of Marcello's

Jewish tunes originate in the twelfth to the fourteenth centuries both in

Spain and in central Europe. Here only three of the most interesting ex-

amples will be quoted, showing Arabic as well as Gregorian influences.4

Ex. 302

Intonazione degli Ebrei spagnuoli sopra Od'cha ki anithani

A translation is given in my study ‘Manuscripts of the Birnbaum Collection’,

Hebrew Union College Annual, xvii (1944), pp. 414–16.

3 Ibid. The manuscripts are in the Library of the Hebrew Union College.

3 A selected edition of Salomone Rossi's vocal compositions has been edited by

Samuel Naumbourg and Vincent d'Indy, 2 vols. (Paris, 1876).

4 Marcello's Hebrew tunes are published and analysed in my study 'Die hebräischen

Intonationen B. Marcello's', Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des

Page 376

THE MUSIC OF ITALIAN JEWRY

329

Intonazione degli Ebrei tedeschi sopra Maos Zur

(b)

Intonazione degli Ebrei spagnuoli su'l Salmo: Shiru ladonai

(c)

THE MUSIC OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN JEWRY

The music of Central European Jewry is of particular interest to the musicologist because of its amazing capacity for development and for active assimilation of foreign elements without loss of identity.

The finest musical monument erected by Central European Jewry is a group of solemn chants for the festivals and High Holidays which in the fifteenth century were already known as ‘Missinai tunes’ (melodies from Mt. Sinai).

They represent the highest musical accomplishment of German Jewry up to the nineteenth century and reflect, in every phrase of music and text, the eschatological and mystical longings of a persecuted people.

While quite a few motives of the ‘Missinai tunes’ originated in the Burgundian art music of the out-going thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries and show certain resemblances to pieces by Guillaume de Machaut, these borrowed elements are by no means clearly discernible; they are completely integrated into the traditional style of European Synagogue music.

This style was replete with ‘wandering motives’ which soon became associated with certain Hebrew phrases or ideas, and thus in course of time became veritable leitmotives.

Two examples will illustrate this point (Ex. 303).

Judentums (Breslau, 1937), pp. 393-416.

Cf. also Idelsohn’s ‘The Traditional Songs of the German Jews in Italy’, Hebrew Union College Annual, xiii (1938), pp. 569-91.

Page 377

330

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

Ex. 303

(a) From Kol Nidre

From Machaut's compositions

From 'Oleinu (Adoration)

From Viddui (Confession)

(b) From Tal-Kaddish

From Machaut's compositions

From Tefilla (Chief prayer)

From Qedusha (Thrice-Holy)

From Kol Nidre

From Tal-Kaddish

From Machaut's compositions

The region in which this assimilation with Burgundian music took place was that which surrounded the old Jewish communities of the Rhineland, especially the cities of Worms, Mainz, Speyer, Treves, and Strasbourg. There we encounter a surprisingly strong familiarity with western German and eastern French folk-songs, many of which were integrated and adjusted to the older style of Jewish chants. Songs like 'Wenn ich des Morgens früh aufsteh', 'Der Lindenschmied', 'Der Bruder-Veit's Ton', &c., became—with altered rhythm and tonality (changed from the original second and eighth to modified first and fifth mode)—part and parcel of Central European Synagogue music. This kind of adaptation of German folk-music came to an end about 1600 when the constant persecutions, peasant and other wars had all but annihilated the Jewish communities so that many were forced to emigrate either to Poland and Russia or to Italy. With the end of the sixteenth century began the rapid deterioration of West and Central European Synagogue music.

As distinct from Jewry in the Arab orbit, European Jewry showed very little interest in musical theory. One interesting exception should be noted, however; in the year 1342 Leo Hebraeus (Rabbi Levi ben Gerson, also known as Gersonides) was requested by Philippe de Vitry to 'demonstrate a certain presupposition in musical science'. In

Page 378

THE MUSIC OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN JEWRY

331

fulfilling this request, Leo Hebraeus wrote his treatise De Numeris Harmonicis in which he placed Philip’s principle of prolationes upon a secure mathematical basis which proved to be most appropriate for the further development of the notation of the ars nova and subsequent systems.1

THE MUSIC OF EAST-EUROPEAN JEWRY

The Jews who emigrated to Poland and Russia from the fourteenth century onward to 1600 found already established Jewish communities in their new homeland, chiefly in the south-eastern portions. Most of these earlier settlers had at one time or another escaped the turmoil in Persia, the Caucasus, or the persecution of the Byzantine government. They spoke Old-Slavonic or Tatar. It was only when the German immigrants came, with their superior Jewish culture and education, that these languages yielded to the Judaeo-German of the newcomers which in later centuries developed into a new language, the Yiddish idiom of all Eastern European Jewry. Together with their Middle-German language, the native Jews also learned their traditional songs. After a period of uncritical acceptance, a certain aversion to the German-Jewish songs set in and this led to a reshaping of the Synagogue chant of the eastern European Jews about the year 1620. During this revision the cantor (Ḥazan) attained a position of paramount importance. Keen to hear new music as the Eastern European Jews always were, but restricted to the synagogue as their main institution of learning and art, they naturally urged the cantor to satisfy this longing. He was forever called upon to provide new tunes for the weekly service on Friday evening and the Sabbath and to interpret and arrange them in a manner that would satisfy the artistic longings of the congregations. Says Idelsohn: ‘The Jew demanded that the Ḥazan, through his music, make him forget his actual life and elevate him upon the wings of his tunes into a fantastic paradisiacal world, affording him a foretaste of Messianic times in the heavenly Jerusalem.’2 The requirements of a good Ḥazan were: he had to possess a sweet voice, in the Oriental sense, meaning a lyric tenor of nasal quality (called by the Byzantians εὐδόφωνον); he had to be well trained in brilliant coloratura-singing, since the Eastern European

1 Neither Coussemaker, Script. Med. Aevi, iii. 10, nor Riemann, Geschichte der Musiktheorie (Berlin, 2nd ed., 1920), pp. 235 ff. understood the real intent of Leo Hebraeus's treatise, which I demonstrated in ‘Theory and Philosophy of Music in Judaeo-Arabic Literature’, Hebrew Union College Annual, xvii (1943), appendix ii, pp. 564–72.

2 Cf. Idelsohn's study ‘The Features of the Jewish Sacred Folk Song in Eastern Europe’, Acta musicologica, iv (1932), pp. 19–21.

Page 379

332

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

style is replete with virtuoso passages of dazzling fantasy and finesse;

he had to be a versatile and original improviser upon certain tradi-

tional modes, exactly as the Arabic or Turkish recital singers im-

provise upon certain maqāmāt.1 East European Jewry called these

modes Gust (from the Italian gusto) or Steiger. The improvisations

were strictly modal and polyrhythmic, rarely influenced by the West-

European systems of beat or metre. The favourite modes were:

  1. The Ahaba Rabba mode (Great Love): E-F-G#-A-B-C-D-E, with

a tendency to build the tune around the tenor D or A. The Greek Orthodox

Church knows this mode, too, as its Echos ii and iv.2 As in Jewish practice,

it is used there mainly for supplicatory texts. It seems probable that the

eastern Jews borrowed this mode from the Byzantine Church since it was

unknown to Central European Jewry. Other elements of Greco-Slavonic

church music have penetrated into eastern Jewish chant, as a comparison

between the Russian Synodal hymn books and the Jewish folk-songs clearly

shows. Cf. Ex. 300 (b), (c).

  1. The Tefilla mode (Prayer): the melodic pattern strongly resembles the

fifth Gregorian psalm-tone; its scale is mixolydian. Cf. Ex. 300 (f).

  1. The Magen Aboth mode (Shield of the Fathers): this corresponds to

a Dorian scale with a minor sixth and is characterized by its melodic

pattern. It moves towards the fifth, leaps to the octave, and then rapidly

descends to the finalis. Cf. Ex. 300 (a).

The emphasis on the vocal soloist, who at the same time had to

perform a priestly function, led inevitably to the idolization of certain

outstanding singers, improvisation led to anarchy, brilliance to empty

showmanship; profound religiosity became, in the course of this

development, a matter of routine or habit for the cantor. Still, by

virtue of his experience, he was able to stir his audience to the depth

of religious emotion. But by the end of the eighteenth century this

style had lost its genuineness.

DISINTEGRATION OF SYNAGOGUE MUSIC BEFORE THE ERA

OF EMANCIPATION

The beginning of the disintegration of Central and East European

Synagogue music was arrested for almost a full century by a new

movement whose roots lay deep in the realm of mysticism. Hasidism,

which—in some respects—may be compared to the pietism of the

seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, came into being in eastern

Europe. It was originally a reaction against rigid rabbinism, but in

1 See pp. 449–50.

2 J. B. Rebours, Traité de Psaltique (Paris, 1906), pp. 47, 90, 111. It seems that the

mode is of Turko-Tatar origin, since neither classic Jewish nor Arab musicians up to the

fourteenth century make any mention of it.

Page 380

DISINTEGRATION OF SYNAGOGUE MUSIC

333

the course of time it developed an independent philosophy of its own. One of its main goals was the attainment of supreme bliss through a mystic approach to God. Music became a chief device of this esoteric philosophy. It was agreed by all adherents of Hasidism that song (without words) was capable of transforming the soul of the singing worshipper to such an extent that definite stages of a mystic approach to God could be reached, stages which otherwise were most difficult to attain.1 The ideas that song is the soul of the universe, that the realm of heaven sings, and similar notions are amazingly like those of the early Christian mystics; even Augustine’s description of the wordless Jubili is born out of the same feeling that mystical music reaches a realm near to God. (It would be a worthy task to compare the ideas of early Christianity concerning music with those of Hasidism; striking parallels would certainly emerge.) Since the Rabbi of the Hasidic community was always the guiding spirit in mystic lore, it became a common practice for the Rabbi to compose his own ‘God-hymns’. Many of them have come down to us in full notation. They invariably start slowly and majestically, but increase in intensity and speed until they reach a fast dance-like rhythm that leads into either an ecstatic jubilation or a lament. These pieces were called niggunim (plural of niggun, tune). In the development of Hasidism they became something like musical symbols of the various schools and ideologies which the respective Rabbi-composers had conceived.

When the economic and political situation of eastern European Jewry became less and less tolerable, large waves of emigrants flooded central and then western Europe. A large number of the emigrants were singers and cantors; their route was usually via Silesia or Moravia to Bavaria. These eastern singers carried the traditions of Hasidic music with them; thus we frequently encounter Hasidic tunes in central Europe from about 1750 on. The central European cantors, fascinated by the beauty of Austrian and German art music as well as of Hasidic tunes, frequently tried to reconcile these two strange worlds of music. This was occasionally attempted by simple juxtaposition, often producing deplorable results, sometimes by a more refined technique, whereby occasionally fine pieces emerged. One of this latter category, a duet for soprano and alto, by Abraham di Caceres of Amsterdam (1740) is given here. The general style resembles that of Handel’s or Jommelli’s chamber duets, but the melodic

1 Rabbi Shneor Zalman said: ‘For the song of the souls—at the time they are swaying in the high regions to drink from the well of the Almighty King—consists of tones only, free and dismantled of burdensome words.’

Page 381

334

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

line is strongly influenced by eastern Jewish chant (‡ marks such passages).1

Ex. 304

(a)

(b)

Traditional motive:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Through the influx of heterogeneous elements such as Slav and German folk-songs, Russian church music, Hasidic tunes, and, above all, art music of central Europe, the Jews who had lost much of their positive assimilating power since 1600 were faced with a task far beyond their ability. They were no longer capable of integrating the various elements into the body of their traditional music; they could no longer even preserve that treasure. Ignorant cantors, being exploited singers, urged by the cravings of the congregations for ever-new music, made a theatre or music-hall out of the Synagogue. Its songs were secularized: contaminated with poor imitations of Italian bravura arias, miserable vocal arrangements of Gluck’s or Haydn’s instrumental pieces. This development was all but inevitable since the ghetti could no longer completely segregate the Jews from their cultural environments. They hungered for new music but were, under the

1

MS. in the Library of the Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati.

Page 382

DISINTEGRATION OF SYNAGOGUE MUSIC

335

rabbinical and secular laws, permitted to hear music solely in the

Synagogue where it was performed vocally, and usually by untrained

singers. Small wonder, then, that the emancipation caught the Jews

in a condition where they cared very little for traditional music; it was

their primary desire to absorb the fascinating trends of contemporary

European music. Typical of this is the enthusiasm with which certain

Jewish laymen—and women—followed the course of two famous

sons of Johann Sebastian Bach. Sara Levy, daughter of the Berlin

‘Hofjude’ Daniel Itzig, the financier of Frederick the Great, and her

circle, were among the favourite disciples of Wilhelm Friedemann

Bach and she was highly praised as a fine harpsichordist by C. P. E.

Bach. She performed many of their works at the early performances of

the Berlin Singakademie.1 Only when a certain point of saturation was

reached did they remind themselves of their abandoned treasure. By

then, about 1840, a good deal of that tradition had been lost or irrevo-

cably forgotten. Under the auspices of modern Liberal Judaism and

the science of Judaism a rejuvenation of Synagogue music has taken

place. But this ars nova had originally only a loose connexion with

the ancient tradition; it took almost a century for the new style to

become so firmly linked with tradition that it could be considered an

integral part of Jewish musical history. This development will be dis-

cussed elsewhere (Vol. X). Let it suffice to say here that despite all

changes, both internal and external, Judaism has succeeded in estab-

lishing, expanding, and preserving its own musical style and tradition.

Notwithstanding many foreign elements absorbed in Jewish chant,

and certain distinct similarities with the music of the Near East,

Byzantium, and Eastern Europe, it can be said that the Jews have

created a musical style sui generis, which satisfies all the criteria of an

autonomous cultural entity.

1 Cf. G. Schünemann, ‘Die Bachpflege der Berliner Singakademie,’ Bach-Jahrbuch,

1928, p. 144; also Ernst F. Schmid, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach und seine Kammermusik

(Kassel, 1931), pp. 14 ff, and Jahrbuch der Sammlung Kippenberg viii, pp. 167–9. Madame

Levy was the great-aunt of Felix Mendelssohn, and conveyed the Bach tradition to his

family.

Page 383

IX

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

By Isobel Henderson

THE MUSICAL TRADITION IN ANTIQUITY1

In the nineteenth century it seemed not incredible that the music of the medieval churches might derive from some trickle of Hellenic tradition. Medieval studies have now dispelled such conjectures: even in antiquity we cannot assume the continuous evolution of one species of ‘Greek music’. The main instrumental types and the main theoretical terms persist. But instruments are inadequate clues to a music predominantly vocal; and the terms of theory seldom referred to musical facts. With the notable exception of Aristoxenus, the purpose of Greek theorists was not to analyse the art of music but to expound the independent science of harmonics; and ultimately the transmission of this harmonic science had no more to do with the history of musical art than the transmission of Greek astronomy or medicine.2

History must start from the great and obvious divergence between the fates of language and of music among Greeks who could quote their Homer for two millennia, but who ceased, after a certain point, to know their musical past except as they knew names of dead athletes. Since the point of divergence vitally affects our interpretation of the ancient sources, it will be convenient to begin with a rough provisional summary of the stages in this history.

(1) Archaic and classical music was transmitted orally with its words. We shall find, flourishing in Athens of the fifth century B.C., a genuine classical tradition—that is, the perpetual competition of new music with recollected models and standards. The supreme document of this tradition is The Frogs of Aristophanes, produced in 405 B.C. Next year Athens fell in defeat and revolution. During the fourth century the reservoirs of musical knowledge in school and theatre were breached. Plato—who had been educated in the classic style brought to its early maturity by Pindar, and had conversed with

1 In all citations of Greek authors, the figures refer to the numbered sections given in the margin of standard editions.

2 Cf. Marrou, Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité2 (Paris, 1950), p. 190; Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique2 (Paris, 1949), pp. 197 ff.

Page 384

THE MUSICAL TRADITION IN ANTIQUITY

337

Aristophanes—was the profound and sensitive critic of new develop-

ments in the music of his times. By about 320 B.C., as the great teacher

Aristoxenus noted, memory of the classic styles was almost obliter-

ated. (2) Meanwhile a modernistic movement, starting from the later

fifth century, had produced ‘popular classics’, which were upheld

above a flood of transient stuff by the Hellenistic creation of repertory

until, after the Roman conquest, they petered out in the backwoods

of Arcadia. The music of the innovators, Philoxenus and Timotheus,

was virtually dead by the later second century B.C., when two

paeans from the derelict metropolis of Delphi sustain the literary

façade, at least, of an obsolescent style. (3) Later antiquity retails a

music of entertainment and artifice. Except under a brief spell of

Grecian intoxication at Hadrian’s court, which bestowed high

patronage on Mesomedes, the composer never again aspires to classic

rank. The musician is now an executant, staging his own impersona-

tions of set literary themes or, more humbly, purveying background

noises for social and ceremonial occasions. A favourite ballet or

mime has its vogue and passes. Writers no longer discussed present

music, for there was no renaissance; nor, as in other arts, could they

study the past, for there was no conservatory. The situation can be

seen in the state of our musical documents, and explained by the

history of education.

(a) The documents. Out of the vast manufacture of music in anti-

quity we have less than twenty written pieces, mostly stray finds of

papyrus and stone. Music was not transmitted in the great ancient

editions from which the main body of Greek literature descends, and

the insatiable scholarship of Alexandria shows no awareness of

musical palaeography. Greek writers constantly quote literary texts,

but in all their extant works there is only one specific reference to a

musical text. This reference has some intrinsic interest. Dionysius of

Halicarnassus, in Augustan times, observes that in the Orestes of

Euripides the music did not rise and fall with the speech-accents,

and further adds that in two paired verses, strophe and antistrophe,

the melody must be identical.1 Now we have a papyrus written about

250–150 B.C., containing some lines with music from an antistrophe

of this very play. It has a variant of a textual error also present

in the Alexandrian edition—but in different order—by which a

line of verse is displaced. Such a displacement, if it had occurred after

the extant music was composed, must almost certainly have broken

the melodic correspondence with the strophe, noted by Dionysius

1 De compositione verborum, 11 and 19. See also below, p. 374.

B 2608

Z

Page 385

338

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

himself. Therefore this music was presumably composed after the

textual corruption began to set in. Dionysius was in no position to

know whether a later text had the music of the original production

of 408 B.C., if he had seen a copy at all.

From other considerations, too, it seems unlikely that a written

record of classical music would be preserved unless by a freak. Some

archaic letter-forms in Greek notation may indeed indicate that pro-

fessional musicians used their ciphers from an early date. But since,

down to the fourth century B.C., no considerable work was composed

for more than one public performance, there was no reason to pre-

serve these memoranda. We have no evidence that written music was

circulated before the times of the Hellenistic repertory.1 Nor is it

likely that many citizens could read music. In the later fourth

century notation was taught for harmonic theory, but this habit

seems to have been short-lived.2 Practical training in music, which

was an independent discipline, was oral both in school and in the

citizen chorus. Musical settings were certainly not incorporated in

texts made for reading—which meant recitation, as opposed to acting

with gesture and song. Except, possibly, from the fourth to the second

century B.C., musical literacy was rare among educated men. The

spread of books may even be thought to have pushed music out of

education, for the mutual aide-mémoire of verse and melody was no

longer indispensable when the words were easily available in written

copies.

(b) Musical education. Plato, attempting in the fourth century B.C.

to save something of the classical education, gives the following

advice to teachers:3

. . . The lyre should be used together with the voices, for the clearness of

its strings, the player and the pupil producing note for note in unison.

Heterophony and embroidery by the lyre—the strings throwing out melodic

lines different to the melodia which the poet composed; crowded notes

where his are sparse, quick time to his slow, high pitch to his low, whether

in concert or antiphony, and similarly all sorts of rhythmic complications

of the lyre against the voices—none of this should be imposed upon pupils

who have to snatch out a working knowledge of music rapidly in three

years.

1 The first extant piece is a papyrus of c. 250 B.C. The early papyrus of Timotheus’

musically famous Persae gives the words only. Players are never portrayed reading music.

On a vase of c. 425 B.C. (Fitzwilliam G73) a singer reads from a scroll, but there is no

evidence that it contained notation besides words. Nor can it be seriously argued that

Alexandrian performances of ‘kitharisms’ from Euripides reproduced the original

settings.

2 Aristoxenus, Harmonics, 39-40; but see Marrou, ‘ΜΕΛΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ’ in L’antiquité

classique, xv (1946), pp. 289 ff.

3 Laws, 812d. See pl. 10 (a) and (b).

Page 386

THE MUSICAL TRADITION IN ANTIQUITY

339

Such accompaniments were heterophonic, not polyphonic or contrapuntal. Plato, speaking of elementary education, is not denying that classical accompaniments could be heterophonic, though they were almost certainly simpler or less obtrusive. What he does make clear is that the composer's legacy was simply the sung poem: the instrumental part is conceived as a free accompaniment at the executant's pleasure (too complex, Plato thinks, for elementary lessons). An archaic crusis (accompaniment) might occasionally be transmitted in set form; but the orchestration of a classical work--from the single aulos supporting a tragic chorus to the strings, wind, and dancers producing a Pindaric ode--was part of a unique spectacle which perished. Some fifth-century Athenians did learn to play not only the domestic lyre but the kithara (a big concert-lyre) and the aulos (a sort of oboe), but in public performance these instruments were normally left to professionals. The citizen's part on the stage was the choric voice; and the classics, repeated by the citizen's voice and his lyre in school and on domestic or social occasions, consisted in a body of song. Early in the fifth century the classical music had reasserted the leadership of the vocal part over the instrumental; from its close, the classicists complain that this priority is being reversed. The nature of the musical change will be more fully discussed below. But from Plato's advice we can already see how, in a music made to show off the professional instrumentalist, the decorative and ephemeral part might overbear the durable melodic structure, which alone passed into the store of remembered classics. When the classical language and its literature began to grow unintelligible, they were saved by the labour of ancient scholars. No such labour was undertaken for music; and the classical melopoeia in fact perished from ear and understanding. Its ethos or character was distorted, as Aristoxenus says--explaining more precisely that when modern musicians attempted the best classical styles at all, they hit wrong notes.1

For the history of music the decisive event was the fall of Athens in 404 B.C., and the revolt against the ideals of her former intellectual élite. In most other matters the post-war education was strongly conservative. But musical incompetence, once the mark of the cad, became a plume of the new snobbery. It was asked whether the citizen should practise music at all, or merely listen--as in Sparta and Macedon, the victorious powers of the fourth century. As Aristotle put it:2 Could music, like cookery, be judged by the consumer, or was

1 Harmonics 23 (cited below, pp. 387 ff.).

2 Politics 1339a-1342b.

Page 387

340

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

practical knowledge needed? He argued that practice was desirable,

and need not be pernicious or vulgarizing unless the citizen, indulging

in the pre-war excesses of Athenian spiritual pride, learned the 'pro-

fessional instruments'. Here began a divorce between the citizen and

the professional, between theory and practice, from which Europe

still suffers. The three years to which Plato, reluctantly, had reduced

musical education were soon cut down to two; and in Hellenistic

times we hear of schools founded with only one music-master or

with none.1 Choral singing was still taught to boys, but the adult

citizen's musicianship so declined that professionals were already

being imported into the fourth-century chorus; and the professional,

on his side, was no longer a cultivated man. Genuine musical

criticism ceases. The classic Athenian comedy had been made for a

society which talked music as it talked politics or war. But in Aristo-

phanes' post-war plays, a shrunken chorus gives us only a last flash

or two of his musical parody; and his successors substituted entr'actes

by variety artists. The Alexandrian era still has excellent stage gossip

on performers, but a first-hand judgement on the style or quality of

music is hardly to be found after the fourth century. Aristotle already

prefers received opinions. His master Plato and his pupil Aristoxenus

are the last who speak to us with the authority of musical under-

standing. Yet their overwhelming influence on later writers was due

less to their understanding than to the authority which they carried

into two subjects still respected in higher education: philosophy and

harmonics. While practical music lost the intellectual prestige which

it had enjoyed since Homer, these two independent sciences reigned

on, using the language of music for their own ends, and finally

usurping its name.2 Mousikê, or musica, which had once included both

music and words, is not always to be translated as 'music' in post-

classical authors. Consequently, the evidence of any Greek theorist

must be interpreted with due regard to his date and place in the

history of Greek ideas: musical, mathematical, or metaphysical.

TRADITIONS OF HARMONIC SCIENCE

Harmonics meant tuning, or acoustic theory. Greek postulates

were melodic and heterophonic, and ignored 'harmony' in our

sense.3 The central problem of harmonic theory was the proper

1 Marrou, Histoire de l'éducation dans l'antiquité (Paris, 1950), pp. 197 ff.

2 πϵpi μovoικῆς is cited as the title of a work by Heraclides Ponticus (fourth century

B.C.) on harmonic theory and psychology, which are regularly called μovoικń in late

antiquity.

3 The term 'constant' (σύμφωνος) refers to melodic progressions. Music had nothing

Page 388

TRADITIONS OF HARMONIC SCIENCE

341

division of musical space. Music, though practically ruled by the

voice, was theoretically analysed in terms of the stretched string,

which yields the words syntonos (taut) for high pitch and aneimenos

(slack) for low, the nomenclature of notes from the plucking fingers,

and some basic features of the notations. The static tuning of the

strings was irreconcilably pitted against the free-wheel of the voice

plotting its own consonances along its undivided continuum; and

this musical antinomy audibly illustrated the Greek theory of num-

bers as delimiting points on an infinitely divisible ground (apeiron).

The earliest harmonic theory used an academic monochord for

mathematical or physical demonstration by the concept of measur-

able sound. Academic controversy later divided theorists under

various labels; but the true distinctions are between the high mathe-

matical method, the empirical, and the inductive.

(a) The term ‘Pythagorean’ is loosely used to cover a long

tradition of mixed doctrine. Pythagoras of Samos, in the sixth cen-

tury B.C., is said to have bequeathed to his disciples the principle of

expressing divisions of the monochord by ratios, which founded the

original and typical tradition of harmonics. It must be taken at its

own valuation, as a self-propelled science, inspired not by a special

interest in the musical art but by a general interest in the nature of the

universe, seen under the strongly mathematical bias of Greek thought.

Its aim was to reach a theoretically satisfying scale, which was con-

ceived as a structural element of the cosmos. The astronomical firma-

ment was pictured in the Music of the Spheres, from whose revolutions

was emitted a scale of tetrachords, each divided by two 9:8 tones

with the leimma, or ‘remnant’, of the perfect fourth.1 The Pytha-

gorean ditone was really used in classical music,2 but long after it was

obsolete the austere scale of the Spheres played on—not to the sen-

sual ear, but in manuals which recorded it by sheer force of theoretical

tradition. Astronomy remained a regular branch of harmonics. The

attempt to express the universe in numbers admitting of an irrational

element was not absurd in itself, though it lacked experimental

method and finally descended into morasses of Neopythagorean

mysticism. It served as a hypothesis to stimulate much first-class

nearer to ‘harmony’ than choirs doubling at the octave (μαγadiζoνtes), which are

1 Plato, Timaeus 35b (cf. A. E. Taylor’s Commentary, pp. 136 ff.); T. Reinach, ‘La

Musique des sphères’, in Revue des études grecques, xiii (1900), pp. 432ff, and ‘L’Harmonie

des sphères’, Congrès international d’histoire de la musique (Paris, 1900), pp. 60 ff.

2 Aristoxenus, Harmonics, 23; R. P. Winnington-Ingram, ‘Aristoxenus and the in-

tervals of Greek music’, Classical Quarterly, xxvi (1932), pp. 195 ff.

Page 389

342

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

mathematical work, which was carried on not only by so-called

'Pythagoreans', but also by such scientists as Ptolemy.

(b) 'Harmonists' means simply 'harmonic theorists', but the term

was applied by Aristoxenus to his immediate predecessors. The

9:8 tone is not equally divisible by ratios, and other mathematical

difficulties were soon noticed. Lasos of Hermione, in the sixth cen-

tury, had smothered such dilemmas with the crude if sensible sug-

gestion that notes had breadth, but the less robust fourth-century

minds were shocked by the discovery that musical space was irrational.

They attempted an empirical solution by splitting up the musical

continuum into the smallest intervals audible, represented in diagrams

of what they called pycnomata (the meaning is of microtones crowd-

ing along a melodic register). There was no question of realizing

equal temperament on physical instruments. The intention was to

reduce all intervals to common numerical terms on a theoretical

gamut of atomic microtones. Plato glanced ironically at the con-

temporary professors, with their ears to the kithara, each fancying

he heard a still smaller tonal unit.1 Aristoxenus had to explain to his

raw students that the pycnomata (besides being logically absurd)

were practically inept, since nobody could sing more than two con-

secutive microtones.2

The 'Harmonist' theory persisted in the form of a linear measure-

ment of units, which have been compared with modern cents. The

comparison is superficial. When ancient theorists measured intervals

—whether by ratios or by units—they did so for no practical purpose,

but because numerical formulation was expected of an exact science.

Textbooks were infested with tables of all possible scales, which never

coexisted in musical history; and while some of the measured intervals

might coincide with some current tunings, they were not direct descrip-

tions of music.3 The unitary measurement of intervals, by a historical

irony, was later attributed to Aristoxenus himself, who had exploded

it. Harmonic doctrines known to Ptolemy in the second century A.D.

as 'Aristoxenian' were largely derived from a school of empiricists and

hack teachers of theory. There was no authorized canon of Aristox-

enus' works, and of the 453 books ascribed to him, not all were from

his pen.4 On technical subjects ancient manuals were often issued—

1 Republic 531a-c.

2 Harmonics 28.

3 The opinion that the equations represent intervals really heard in music, and that

Aristoxenus heard less exactly, lacks concrete evidence: the nature of these works is

not aesthetic but theoretical.

4 See Düring, Porphyrios und Ptolemaios (Göteborg, 1934), p. 183. F. Wehrli's edition

Page 390

TRADITIONS OF HARMONIC SCIENCE

343

whether for piety or fraud—under the pseudonym of an appropriate

authority (e.g. ‘Galen’ for a medical treatise); and the Aristotelian

school, to which Aristoxenus belongs, was much overlaid with such

fakes. The so-called ‘Aristoxenians’ used the authentic and the

spurious without discrimination. Their reversion to ‘Harmonist’

principles of measurement is incompatible with all that we know of

Aristoxenus’ authentic theory.

(c) Whereas Plato had embodied the musical civilization of a

past Athenian nobility, Aristoxenus was the son of a professional

musician from the western colony of Tarentum, where old fashions

lingered. At Athens he learned the new inductive logic from Aristotle;

and under the impulse of this scientific method—later to collapse

into a mere terminology—he attempted a true descriptive anatomy

of music from his unique knowledge of fourth-century practice and

of the earlier classics. Besides excerpts of varying authenticity, we

possess an important but incomplete text arranged in three books,

but actually compiled from at least four sources, overlapping in

subject-matter, and presumably put together from pupils’ notes of

his lectures in Athens soon after 322 B.C.1 In substance it has no

parallel among extant Greek theorists. Whereas mathematical har-

monics (including the empiricist school) necessarily postulated a

series of notes as fixed points on a hypothetical gamut—or, in effect,

a diagram—an inductive theory of music had to start from the

voice in action. As Aristoxenus recognized, real melody presupposed

not a fixed scale or tuning, but a line on which the voice’s potentially

infinite stations could be determined only by ear and understanding

(ἀκοὴ καὶ διάνοια). Given a good ear to hear intervals, the mind must

define them by their melodic functions. The only sane division of

musical space was by ‘consonances’ (i.e. the melodic progressions

to the fourth, fifth, and octave): these the ear could judge exactly,

or within a hair’s breadth, whereas it found other intervals ‘dis-

sonant’ and variable in size. For melodic purposes, any basic note-

series must be so conceived that each note lay a perfect fourth from

the fourth in succession or a perfect fifth from the fifth. That this

principle excluded numerical expressions of intervals was obvious

to any educated Greek. It was substituted for the numerical method

as a practical assumption of the ear in a music which did not pose the

(Basle, 1945) undertakes no historical criticism of the excerpts, and brackets the

anachronism of frag. 124 without comment.

1 Harmonics 30; Düring, op. cit., p. 183.

Page 391

344

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

acoustic problems of modern instrumental harmony over large registers. The less precisely heard variations of intervals were then defined, so far as the ear demanded, not by equations but by recognized shades (χρόαι).1

To the real meaning of ordinary musical terms in his day, Aristoxenus will be our clearest guide.

GRAMMAR AND SYNTAX

(a) The Notes. The basic figure of analysis was the tetrachord. It was coupled with another tetrachord, either disjunct or conjunct (diezeugmenon or synemmenon: genitive plurals with long ō). The skeleton is here represented in our natural key:

Ex. 305

(i) Disjunct

(a) Diezeugmenon

(ii) Conjunct

(b) Synemmenon

This is the elementary grammar of fourths and fifths pivoting on the 'fixed notes' from which the melody takes its bearings. The fixed notes are called, in descending order: (i) nete, paramese, mese, hypate or (ii) nete, mese, hypate.

Each tetrachordal skeleton is filled in by two 'movable notes'. The possible ranges of their motion were classified in three genera, roughly represented as follows:

Ex. 306

(a) Enharmonic

(b) Chromatic

(c) Diatonic

In each case, the higher of the two movable points is called lichanos, the lower parypate—or, in the upper of two tetrachords, the higher point is paranete, the lower trite. In the enharmonic and chromatic genera, the segment lichanos-hypate is collectively called the pyknon, and must be less than the interval mese-lichanos.

The names of the notes do not refer to pitch, for they may be differently placed in different genera, and nete varies with the conjunct lichanos (see Ex. 306 above).

1 e.g. Aristoxenus recognizes two 'shades' of each of the three 'generic' positions of lichanos (see Ex. 306 above).

Page 392

and disjunct systems. They are mostly adjectives of the implied noun

chorde—a string or, simply, a note. They are probably not names of

actual strings, for some notes may have been played by stopping one

string. They refer primarily to the action of the hand playing: e.g.

lichanos means ‘forefinger’; hypate means ‘highest’ to the hand on

the tilted kithara; nete ‘lowest’ to the hand—although in pitch hypate

is the lowest note and nete the top.1

The double tetrachord, thus filled with movable notes, is still only a

melodic skeleton. It give the typical minimum of notes: our written

pieces show that others could be inserted besides. Greek music must

never be conceived in terms of any continuous scale—least of all the

harmonic series of our ‘just intonation’. Its essential character lies in

the logical priority of the fixed notes, which hold the melody between

the iron girders of consonant progressions, over the contrasting flex-

ible effects of the mobile notes, which bound various and irregular

intervals, some hair-split, some widely gapped (and are no less

mutable in the more evenly spread diatonic genus). Only the fixed

notes can be exactly translated on our schematic staff. The concept

of uniform octave-scales is especially inept, since a pair of tetra-

chords could be of different genera. The unit of the later solmiza-

tion, as of the earliest analysis, is still not the octave but the

tetrachord.2

(b) The Systems. It was for purposes of nomenclature only that

theorists, during the fourth century B.C., worked out an extended

note-system. The ‘Perfect System’ was compiled of two pairs of

conjunct tetrachords separated by a tone of disjunction (diazeuxis)—

the double octave being completed by a bottom note, whose name

proslambanomenos (implying the masculine noun tonos) indicates

an ‘addition’ from theory, not from music. The ‘Lesser Perfect

System’, by omitting paramese, drops the disjunctive tone, substi-

tuting a conjoined tetrachord (synemmenon) for the purpose of illus-

trating the transitory effect of a modulation to the fourth. The two

Systems (which Ptolemy combined in one diagram) are given over-

leaf separately. Positions of ‘movable notes will of course vary with

the genus.

Each note was called by its name with that of its tetrachord: e.g.

in (i) the note marked e is ‘nete of the tetrachord diezeugmenon’,

E is ‘hypate meson’, &c.

1 Greeks did not, as Curt Sachs conjectures, call high pitch ‘low’ and vice versa: cf.

Plutarch, Quaestiones Platonicae ix. 2. i; ps.-Aristotle, Problems, xix. 3.

2 Greek solmization (known only from late theory) rendered a tetrachord of the form

la sol fa mi by ta tê to tê.

Page 393

346

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

(i) Greater Perfect System

(ii) Lesser Perfect System

The pitch of these Systems is relative or, rather, abstract. They are themselves abstractions. Certainly a salient feature of the fourth-century musical revolution was the use of metabolai or modulations of various types. It raised—as does all modulation on instruments with fixed tuning—the problem of establishing a basic note-series sufficiently regular to minimize false melodic relations when two tunings are exchanged. But the working out of this problem in real music must be clearly separated from its elaboration in theory. The player modulating did not hitch on a spare tetrachord synemmenon. Though the hypothesis of a fixed pentatonic tuning is not proven, it remains most probable that he tuned his kithara not to a continuous scale, but by a gapped accordatura suiting the requirements of his music, and supplemented or adapted it by stopping his strings. (The aulos could be similarly adapted by devices of fingering and blowing.)1

1 Düring, 'Studies in Musical Terminology in Fifth-century Literature', in Eranos, xliii (1945), pp. 176 ff. Only so can the attested complexity of much Greek instrumentalism be explained. Against the pentatonic hypothesis first proposed by Sachs in Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, vi (1924), pp. 289 ff., and further developed by himself and Otto

Page 394

GRAMMAR AND SYNTAX

347

The continuous scale was a purely academic apparatus. Its name—systema—is a term not of music but of harmonic theory; and the dual System was intended only to exemplify on the blackboard (as it were) the mechanism of a simple modulation.

Greek musical history is still bedevilled by confusions, ancient and modern, of the terms systema, harmonia, tonos, eidos (= species), genos (= genus), tropos (= modus). They can be clarified only by chronological and critical distinction between the Greek sources. To anticipate conclusions, we shall find that harmonia, in the classical composers and in musically intelligent prose-writers, means a musical idiom together with the tuning which it postulates—whereas in musically ignorant theorists it is confused with an eidos or species of the octave, which, like systema, is a term of theory, not of music. Again, to Aristoxenus the terms genos and tropos connote both a tuning and a musical style—whereas to inferior theorists both are mere scales. Above all, it is necessary to reach a true definition of tonos. It means, literally, ‘a stretching’. It first occurs in harmonic theory in the fourth century B.C. From Homeric times the verb ‘to stretch’ was used of the preliminary stringing and tuning of the instrument; but the noun tonos is never used by a composer, never connotes a melodic style or operation.1 In Greek theorists tonoi are continuous double-octave scales, in all three genera, set up on successive degrees of a basic note-series or System, with a superficial likeness to the scales of pitch-keys on a pianoforte. These tonoi were originally suggested by the musical fact of modulation in the fourth century; and the prevalent opinion of modern writers is that they represent real pitch-keys used in music. The view here set forth will be found to differ. It is, briefly, that the tonoi were theoretical concepts employed to define and name the relative loci of the topography of harmonic space. For nineteenth-century scholars, preoccupied with the search for continuity between ancient and modern, it was particularly hard to get away from the underlying notion of the octave with one supreme tonic; and efforts were made to ascribe such a tonic function to the Greek mese.2 But, on the contrary, the

Gombosi, convincing arguments are marshalled by R. P. Winnington-Ingram in an article in Classical Quarterly, new series, vi (1956).

1 Except by mere confusion with harmonia. ἐντείνω (-oμαι) does not, as a scholiast on Aristophanes Clouds 968 says, mean to pitch high; see Rogers's editorial note. In compounds -τονος means a tone or tension of the voice, with no pitch-connotation (e.g. ὑπέρτονος = loud). In late theory tonoi are miscalled tropoi.

2 The one reference to musical usage is in ps.-Aristotle, Problems, xix. 20 (undated), saying that good tunes recur often to mese, like good prose to the word ‘and’—a remark notable only for its stupidity.

Page 395

348

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

Aristoxenian analysis shows us a music of tetrachords oscillating on plural pivot-notes between the disjunct scheme, which covers an octave, and the conjunct, in which nete comes down to the seventh from hypate (or the fourth from mese). These scholars persistently, if unconsciously, tended to treat the Greek Perfect System as though it corresponded to the tuning of a musical instrument, upon which key-scales could have some real meaning. It seemed to them incredible that Greek theorists played with harmonic concepts for their own sake and for no musical purpose. Here Aristoxenus was the exception. But he has left us no direct treatment of the tonoi, and we depend on other theorists, for whom harmonic science was superior to musical art precisely because it had no practical use.1 A historical account of the tonoi, while recognizing their initial derivation from musical experience, must remember the unbounded capacity of fourth-century thought (outside the Aristotelian school) for generating abstract entities from words without facts.

THE TONOI

Pitch

The assumption that absolute pitch-values were recognized in Greek music is not warranted by any decisive ancient evidence. It rests on modern equations of harmoniae or tonoi with pitch-keys.

(i) In its original form, Monro’s theory that the classical harmoniae were pitch-keys no longer needs refuting; and recent modifications of this theory—to the effect that the harmoniae had specific pitches as well as individual tunings—are no better founded.2 Plato, indeed, tells us that some harmoniae, used for men’s drinking-songs, were ‘low’, and others, used for women’s keening-songs, ‘high’. But since he adds that the latter are morally unfit for either sex, it is clear that they might be sung in a male register too. Their pitch-connotations are purely relative and general, meaning no more than what Greek authors call them—viz. ‘high’, ‘low’, or ‘middle’.3

In the fourth century B.C. the new tonoi were at first described vaguely as harmoniae, and the Academician known as Heraclides Ponticus rightly protested that a harmonia was not defined by its

1 In late antiquity it was compared for speculative purity to the science of generation of birds, which (unlike the best harmonic science) was pure nonsense (Berthelot-Ruelle, Collection des anciens alchimistes grecs, v. 15, 52, 436, lines 7–11).

2 Gombosi’s ingenious Tonarten und Stimmungen der antiken Musik (Copenhagen, 1939) does not refute major arguments brought against D. B. Monro, Modes of Ancient Greek Music (Oxford, 1894), nor adequately criticize sources of uneven value.

3 Plato, Republic 398e (cf. Denniston in Classical Quarterly, vii (1913), p. 99).

Page 396

THE TONOI

349

pitch.1 His own definition, however, only serves to show the confusion

of these terms in a period of change, when the old harmoniae were for-

gotten and the old education disrupted. A harmonia, he declares,

must have ‘a peculiar eidos of ethos and pathos’. Eidos technically

meant a species or segment of the octave; ethos and pathos (musical

character and feeling) he can only connote with irrelevant nonsense

about the racial psychology of Dorians, Aeolians, and Ionians, whose

names had been attached to some of the old harmoniae. These names

suggest to his witless fancy that there are three harmoniae, because

there are three Greek races. Other speculators of the time were busy

reducing all harmoniae to two—and all winds to north and south.2

Late antiquity believed that Lamprocles and Damon, in the fifth

century B.C., had already analysed harmoniae as octave-species—

whereas the species had barely been enumerated before Aristoxenus.3

The late Neoplatonist Aristides Quintilianus actually produced six

irregular species of the enharmonic scale purporting to be the har-

moniae named in Plato’s Republic, but he cites no authority.4

Against such confusions of idioms with scales we must appeal to

Aristoxenus. He briefly dismisses the preoccupation of his predeces-

sors with ‘the seven octachords which they called harmoniae’.5 To

avoid this misnomer he refers to the old Phrygian harmonia as ‘the

Phrygian melos’ (canto)—with the significant remark that one would

not understand it merely by transcribing it. Few musicians of his

day, he tells us, still knew the classical idioms (tropoi).6 Few theorists

of his day had been educated in music at all. The confusion was

merely verbal. When the old harmoniae were obsolescent, some

of their names had been applied or adapted to the new tonoi with

their attendant species. But species and tonoi together, as we shall

see, formed a coherent theoretical structure postulating a basic scale

which was drawn up in the fourth century. They can have borne no

relation, except in name, to the harmoniae of the earlier music.

(ii) The tonoi certainly had ‘pitch’ in the sense of relative position.

But Aristoxenus, c. 320 B.C., finds them still in the chaos of novelty,

1 Cited by Athenaeus, 324e-325c. ‘The man from Heraclea Pontica’, writing c. 365–

310 B.C., was given to miscellaneous speculation without experience (cf. Cicero, Ad

Quintum fratrem, III. 5, 1).

2 Criticized by Aristotle, Politics 1290a.

3 By Eratocles only (Aristoxenus, Harmonics 6). On Lamprocles and Damon, ps.-

Plutarch, De musica 16. In Plato, Philebus 17 c-d, note systema (not eidos).

4 Mountford, ‘The musical scales of Plato’s Republic’, in Classical Quarterly, xlvii

(1923), accepts Aristides’ authority, but see Monro, op. cit., pp. 94–100. Aristides’

source was presumably some commentary on Plato.

5 Harmonics 36 (Westphal’s reading).

6 Ibid. 39 rad 23.

Page 397

350

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

without agreement as to their relative position or the order of their

names. He gives two lists from contemporary theory, in ascending

relative order, as follows:1

I Hypophrygian ?

Hypodorian } 1/2 tone

Mixolydian } 1/2 tone

Dorian } 1 tone

Phrygian } 1 tone

Lydian

II Hypophrygian } 3/4 tone

Hypodorian } 3/4 tone

Dorian } 1 tone

Phrygian } 3/4 tone

Lydian } 3/4 tone

Mixolydian

The second school took their three-quarter-tone intervals from the

borings of auloi. In rebuking their illogicality, Aristoxenus emphasizes

the inaccuracy of manufacture and intonation for which the aulos was

notorious, but says nothing of any absolute pitch. Manufacturers of

auloi did preserve some pitch-standard by general reference to other

auloi; but this very fact shows that the Greek idea of pitch was rela-

tive. Absolute pitch, on the contrary, would have determined the

manufacture of instruments. Some passages from late theory, assign-

ing different tonoi to different instruments or ranges of the voice,

have been taken to imply real pitch-keys: yet the same theorists

postulate a pure relativity of pitch, in which the limits of musical

sound are definable only by the limits of instruments or hearing.2

These vague and contradictory assumptions are outweighed by clearer

inferences. The anomalies of the two lists of tonoi cited above are

incompatible with any idea of absolute pitch. Absolute pitch is

nothing if not a practical convention, and it cannot exist in con-

vention or in practice without some consistent terms of reference

to the notes or keys indicated by such a pitch-standard. But Greek

writers never had consistent terms of reference to pitch. Both the

nomenclature and the number of tonoi were in endless fluctuation

and dispute. Seven tonoi represented the diatonic degrees of the

octave—or the Seven Spheres (a book On the Seven Tonoi was

written by Thrasyllus, astrologer to the emperor Tiberius). In imperial

Roman times a baker's dozen—one on each semitone and a super-

fluous thirteenth at the octave—was imputed (incredibly) to Aristox-

1 Ibid. 37. In List I no interval is given for the Hypophrygian, which was sometimes

omitted.

2 Bellermann's Anonymus 28 (but cf. 13); Aristides 16 J (but cf. 15 J). Note Gauden-

tius 20–21 and Aristoxenus, Harmonics 13–15.

Page 398

enus.1 A set of fifteen was begotten by a passion for verbal triads

(e.g. Hypodorian—Dorian—Hyperdorian).2 The various sets coexisted, with alternative and often anomalous names: no need for

practical agreement was felt.

(iii) None of these nomenclatures agrees with the names given to

kitharists' tunings in Ptolemy's day. Theorists used an academic

fifteen-stringed apparatus, of no fixed register, to represent the

Perfect System; and Ptolemy, after tabulating his own scientific

results, shows which sections of his gamut will also yield tunings in

current use. But these tunings, whatever they may signify, are

variously tempered sequences of intervals, not pitch-keys; and their

names show no relation between the practical and the theoretical uses

of terminology.3 Once, in Aristoxenus, the name of a tonos is associ-

ated with a low aulos; but the same passage proves that the attempt

to define tonal relations by auloi was an ignorant mistake.4

(iv) In late antiquity tonos-scales are sometimes transcribed with

musical notation. Since the notation may be merely an alterna-

tive means of expressing their relative positions, these tonoi are

not thereby proved to be pitch-keys for practical reference. But

if Greek notation were applicable at any pitch required, we should,

a priori, expect to find all musical pieces transcribed in the same

central nucleus of notational signs, with the least possible use of

'sharps'. Now this expectation is not falsified by the Delphic

paeans of the second century B.C.—our earliest fragments of sufficient

length to provide a valid test. But of the later pieces, one (the

'Ajax' fragment) is written with the dashes which, in the tonoi,

raise a note by an octave; and, while the rest fall within a central

nucleus spanning a twelfth, they do not all use the same basic

notational sequence of 'naturals' and 'sharps'. The use of variant

sequences is generally taken to denote differences of real pitch;

and it must be clearly stated that this hypothesis has not been

disproved. Yet other explanations, though unconfirmed, are con-

ceivable. In late antiquity at least, variant notational sequences

might have indicated different temperaments of intervals (as on

the several sections of Ptolemy's abstract gamut), or different loci

1 'Cleonides', Isagoge 12. Both the number and the names are too illogical for

Aristotle's pupil. The work on tonoi ascribed to him, if genuine, may have been about

'tones' (so Düring).

2 Cf. Winnington-Ingram, Mode in Ancient Greek Music (Cambridge, 1936), pp. 15-

3 See further below, p. 357.

4 Aristoxenus, Harmonics 37-43, if the text is sound. In Athenaeus 634 f., citing

Aristoxenus, names of aulos-registers are not related to tonoi.

Page 399

352

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

upon a standard tuning of instruments or theoretical apparatus, or different conventions of musical transcription. Those who prefer the hypothesis of fixed pitch-keys have to explain the absence, in Greek writers, of reference to absolute standards of pitch, and, in Greek music, of the conditions which would plausibly account for the development of such standards. They freely admit that, on this hypothesis, a radical distinction must be drawn between the tonoi on consecutive semitones, as indicating pitch, and the Ptolemaic system of seven tonoi, which is pitchless: yet Ptolemy's polemics against the former would be inept if the distinction existed. In sum, difficulties arise on either view. In the present writer's provisional judgement, the arguments for attributing fixed pitch-values to some tonoi (but not to all) are outweighed by the improbabilities.1

It is agreed that Ptolemy's tonoi have no real pitch. Here at least, tonoi and species were together devised for a purpose independent of musical practice: to name points, both fixed and movable, upon an ideal diagrammatic structure of no real pitch-value, but of unquestioned importance for ancient scientific thought.

Nomenclature by Tonoi and Species

The tonoi transpose the scale-form of the Perfect System to other degrees of the System's own tonal series.2

Ex. 307

Here the Perfect System (cf. p. 340 above), filled out in the diatonic genus and in a handy key, is set up on the staff vertically, while a tonos-scale in transverse descent transposes the same tonal

1 See, however, Winnington-Ingram's careful discussion, op. cit., pp. 49–53.

2 No real pitch is here implied. Logically, sol-fa should be used (as by Düring, op.cit.), but the modern notation gives a clearer picture.

Page 400

PLATE X

(a)

(b)

GREEK INSTRUMENTS

(a) A kithara player singing (c. 480 B.C.)

(b) A Greek music school showing lyres and double auloi (early 5th century B.C.)

Page 402

THE TONOI

353

sequence one degree higher.1 The double tetrachord which is the scale-form's central core (= mi1-mi) is marked in black notes, and its 'natural' locus on the System's register is set between bars. The System is here treated as a static register around which the typical scale-form is borne by the revolving tonoi. As this scale-form moves one degree higher, one top note of the tonos is cut off and one bottom note is added within the System's register.

The System's nomenclature was used in a double sense: (1) as a term of reference to notes by their serial order of position (thesis) on the basic System; and (2) like a sol-fa, to describe notes by their function (dynamis) in the melodic scale-form (= mi1-mi) without regard to its position. In Ex. 307, M remains mese by thesis on the System; m becomes mese by dynamis in the scale-form (here transposed by the tonos).

Our staff, with its assumptions of equal temperament and real pitch, might tempt us to identify the dynamic m with the thetic paramese as the same pitch-note (here written as middle B). But Greek theory could neither refer to external pitch-standards, nor ignore the fact that the scale-form's fixed and movable notes must shift their positions in different tonoi. Nete diezeugmenon, dynamically defined as a fixed fifth from mese, cannot be precisely described by thesis; and this is doubly evident in the present example, where dynamic nd takes a sharpened position with no place nor name on the diatonic System. It can only be described as 'nete diezeugmenon in this tonos'. Therefore the tonoi themselves had to be named and fixed in a relative order of intervals one from the other. Our keys are serially numbered A, B, C, &c., by the sequence of their tonics in a note-series established by musical usage. But, although C always stands at the same interval above or below A, it is not true that the key of C is higher or lower than the key of A, since two melodies in A and C may use the same register. Greek theory logically defined tonoi by reference not to any single note like our tonic in an arbitrarily chosen series, but to the whole central register of the System where the tonoi meet and are comparable--viz. the octave set between bars. Within this octave each of the seven tonos-scales casts a different segment or species of the octave. In Ex. 307 the segment of the tonos between the bars has the sequence of tones and semitones T S T T T S T. This sequence was named the Phrygian octave-species, and the tonos was accordingly called the Phrygian. The names

1 Tonos-scales were read downwards at first, later upwards. The change confused the notation, but is otherwise irrelevant. A uniform method is here adopted.

B 3608

A a

Page 403

354

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

were given artificially, and the sole purpose of the species was to locate each tonos by its position relatively to the other six tonoi, without using arbitrary or practical criteria. The whole set may for provisional purposes be presented as follows:1

Ex. 308

Mesae: D C# B A G# F# E

= Natural Series: F E D C B A G

The typical scale-form mi1–mi—always in black notes—is carried down the System’s register by each tonos successively; the white notes at either end represent the space through which this scale-form moves. The System’s central octave-register (here = e–E, marked not between bars but in square brackets on each tonos) is successively filled by seven different species of the revolving scale. These species have no melodic meaning: they exist only as thetic terms of reference to the relative positions of the tonoi. It will be noted that the System’s central octave-register is the only octave whose terminals all the tonoi have in common. If, like the feebler Greek theorists, we insert extra tonoi at the inter-diatonic semitones, these tonoi will fail by a semitone to touch the two terminals of the central octave where the species meet. Since there are only seven species of the octave, the logical number of tonoi is seven. These must be projected on the System at a relative pitch-position one-and-a-half degrees below their ‘natural’ sequence (i.e. the mesae D C# B A G# F# E correspond to a sequence F E D C B A G).

It is, however, only for the limited purpose of showing the relative locations of the tonoi that they are projected on the System. For this purpose the unequal temperament of the dynamic scale is ignored, and all the thetic degrees of the System are treated as equal tones or

1 This figure, serving only to correlate tonoi by thesis, appears to hypostatize the System as a keyboard; but see below, pp. 355 ff.

Page 404

semitones. But both tonoi and species are purely thetic concepts—the thesis of a tonos being expressed by its species. Greek harmonic thought could also compass the abstract idea of modulation as a purely dynamic act. Ptolemy, after discussing the modulation expressed by the Conjunct System (cf. p. 340), proceeds to explain the general idea of modulatory dynamics, as follows:1

The construction of tonos-modulation does not occur for the purpose of adapting a melody to higher or lower voices: for a change of that kind it is enough to tune the whole instrument up or down, since no variation is produced within a melody when it is sung right through as a whole, the same by higher voices as by lower. Modulation occurs in order that the identical melody, in the same voice, starting now from the higher registers, now from the lower, should produce a certain alteration of ethos (mood), through the fact that the two extremes of the melody, as it modulates, no longer coincide with the two extremes of the voice, but at the one end the voice's limit always terminates before the melody's, and at the other end the melody's before the voice's. Thus a melody originally fitted to the compass of the voice, by falling short at the one end and gaining ground at the other as it modulates, gives to the ear the impression of an altered ethos.

Ptolemy's point will be easily seen in diagrammatic form.

Central octave-register

(a)

(b)

(c)

The melodic scale-form is unchanged by modulation: i.e. there is no change of 'mode'. Ptolemy conceives the central octave-register as the vocal space, always and completely filled by the melody, which is symbolized by the constant scale-form mi-mi. This melodic

1 Harmonics ii. 7.

Page 405

356

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

scale may lie within the vocal register in its continuous form T T S

T T S (numbered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 in (a), above). If a modulation to the fourth occurs (b) we may imagine the continuous scale

bodily shifted up a fourth; but then its upper notes would fall outside the register's top limit. They can, however, be picked up again

an octave below, in the empty space left at the bottom of the register.

As Ptolemy puts it, the melody falls off the register at one end and

gains ground at the other. The register is still completely filled with

the same melodic scale-form mi1–mi, but in a differently distributed

sequence (numbered 4 5 6 7 8 [= 1] 2 3 4). So, in our music, modulation may shift the tonic without changing the tessitura.

Viewed as a continuous scale, the note-series within the register

has changed from T T S T T T S (the Dorian species) to T T S

T T S (the Mixolydian). But this has nothing to do with the melodic

movement), in which the scale-form does not change. The species

merely indicates the tonos or thetic degree of the modulation, which

does not here concern Ptolemy. He is conceiving the register not as a

basic scale (as in Ex. 308) but as an empty space which the voice can

fill as it chooses: there is no question of specifying the sharps or

flats required to illustrate any particular modulation in practice.

Elsewhere Ptolemy insists that a melodic modulation is not a change

of tonos (i.e., as he here says, of repetition at another pitch-degree),

but a change of systema. The systema does not, like a species, consist

in a particular sequence of individual notes, but in the relations of

disjunction or conjunction between tetrachords.1 Modulation to the

fourth (he explains) is effected by eliminating the disjunctive tone:

thus in (c) above the functional paramese of (a) drops out, and nete

comes down to the fourth above mese, making a total heptachord of

two conjunct tetrachords instead of the disjunct tetrachords of (a).

Here our own sol-fa becomes inept: the octave was not a rigid unit,

and it does not matter whether we express the tetrachord T T S as

la sol fa mi, mi re do si, or re do sib la. It is this change of system that

Ptolemy supposes to have the aesthetic effect of an altered ethos: the

ear is left in doubt whether mese has moved up a fourth, as expressed

in (b), or whether paramese has dropped out, as expressed in (c).2

The change between disjunction and conjunction is the only type

of modulation that Ptolemy will call melodic, although any permutation of tonoi or genera could be admitted theoretically and on paper.

1 Harmonics ii. 6. This is the only significant distinction between systemata, though

some theorists enumerate them by size, genus, &c., as any ordered note-series.

2 Ptolemy is, however, hazy and abstract on the aesthetic effect: it may be merely his

own intellectual inference.

Page 406

THE TONOI

357

In theory, also, the idea of other tetrachordal forms besides T T S was entertained; but only T T S was used in regular harmonic structures-with its corresponding enharmonic and chromatic genera, which are attested in real musical use from the fourth to second centuries B.C. Whether, or when, other forms were realized in musical practice we have not sufficient evidence to say. Ptolemy, after his theoretical demonstrations of his own temperament of intervals, turns to the empirical data of kitharistic tunings in current use, to find them at various segments of his academic gamut. These tunings consist of tetrachords and octachords, both diatonic and chromatic, in several forms or shades of tonal sequence, which are named sterea and malaka on the lyre, tritae, hypertropae, parypatae, tropoi, iasti-aeolia, and lydia on the kithara. This nomenclature is a pot-pourri of technical jargon, and cannot be connoted with Ptolemy's tonos-names. If, as some maintain,1 the tunings are melodic scales of variant modal idioms, they are remoter than ever from Ptolemy's concept of a uniform melodic scale. But Ptolemy's words do not imply so much;2 and since the terms differ from the lyre to the kithara, they would seem to refer to some more mechanical aspect-e.g. to professional operations of preliminary tuning of the instruments, like the conventional tuner's chords in testing a pianoforte. This would fit the context. Ptolemy adduces these tunings as phenomena independent of his own harmonic system, to show that his academic calculations of tuning are not incompatible with common acoustic experience. With this confirmation, he can proceed to his purpose-the harmonics of astronomy.

Whatever these tunings may represent, their names show how far musical practice had diverged from harmonic theory. To imagine that Ptolemy of Alexandria did, or could, reflect contemporary forms of music in his main doctrine is to mistake his position and aims. He lived nearly five centuries away from the inductive method'3 by which Aristoxenus had analysed music as he knew it 'by ear and understanding'. In all his many works, his great achievement was to recapture the high Alexandrian tradition of mathematical sciences after an age of collapse and decline. He did not change the terms of the problems: it was hard enough to recover them-and, on occasion, to improve their expression. In the harmonic field (a small part of his activity) the decline can be seen from his own criticisms of recent pretenders to the names of 'Pythagorean' or 'Aristoxenian'.3 He was

1 Düring, op. cit., pp. 201–15: the first serious analysis of Ptolemy, Harmonics i. 16, ii. 1 and 16, but the solutions are inevitably speculative.

2 τὰ μελωδούμενα (ii. 16, chapter-heading) does not in theoretical contexts refer only to melopoeic use.

3 Cf. Düring, op. cit., p. 83.

Page 407

358

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

perhaps the one man alive who had the logical insight and the

experience of astronomical diagrams to assimilate the harmonic

system of early Alexandrian thought; and in harmonics, as elsewhere,

it is early Alexandrian thought that he interprets to us.

Some account of Greek harmonic theory has been necessary

for a negative purpose: to prevent unprofitable searching for musical

significance in mathematical concepts. There is also a positive reason.

Greek notation, though also used for transcribing musical composi-

tions, was developed largely by theorists for their own purposes,

and cannot be properly understood without reference to the theoreti-

cal tonoi. Not that the better minds—Aristoxenus or Ptolemy—had

recourse to notation. It could neither define the functions of notes,

like the verbal nomenclature, nor measure the exact size of intervals,

like the arithmetical cipher. It was used among a lower class of har-

monic professors, known only from late antiquity. Since they too

claimed to be ‘theoretical’, prestige obliged them to include the

Perfect System in their doctrine; but their heads were too weak to

relate it correctly to the tonoi—nor, indeed, could it be correctly

related to their irrational sets of thirteen or fifteen tonoi on con-

secutive semitones. Some merely gave lists of tonos-names with rela-

tive intervals. Others set out their tonoi with notational signs; and the

anomalies of Greek notation, as we know it, may owe something to

their hands.

THE NOTATIONS

The Greek notations are explained to us only by a few minor

theorists of the third or fourth centuries A.D.—in particular, one

Alypius, who gives a set of tonos-scales with reproductions and verbal

descriptions of the corresponding signs in two notations. A central

nucleus of the signs of both occurs in extant musical fragments going

back to c. 250 B.C. The final series of the Alypian signs is here given in

continuous sequence with the relative diatonic note-series in our staff

(no absolute pitch):

Ex. 309

I. 3. A' Δ' H' K' N'| ⊥ * | A Δ H K | N Π T X | V ∇ h × U | U -1

  1. B' E' Θ' Λ' Ξ'| ⊥ A | B E Θ Λ | Ξ P T Ψ | R F m V II | b y

  2. U' r' Z' I' M' O'| ∅ U | r Z I M | O C Φ Ω | T 7 - w ? | 3 o

II 1. Z' N' C' <'n'K'| n Z N C < n | K C F M | r r E h H | E P

  1. -'U' V' X' r A| -U V X| × U R L l w d| w l

  2. -'コ'>'Y'I'| -コ > Y| × 7 l 7 l 3 H P| 3 T

Page 408

THE NOTATIONS

359

The second notation, which is the earlier, shows a nucleus of fifteen signs-some alphabetic, but in no regular alphabetic order-evidently put together to fit the Perfect System a 1-A in the fourth century B.C. This is extended upwards, by signs repeated with a dash, to the top g 1. Below A two extra bottom notes G 1 and F 1 have been added, with signs later borrowed from the first notation. Each sign of row no. 1 (which is the diatonic note-series) is triplicated with its own sharp and double-sharp : for example, in the triad E horizontal ll is the sharp and reversed E the double-sharp of E erect. The triads doubtless originated in the enharmonic and chromatic dieses; but only theorists distinguish the chromatic (by a cross-stroke) from the enharmonic; and the same signs are also used for other sharps. It is possible that a triad could be played on one string, but the hypothesis that the notations were tablatures will not bear examination.1

The first notation, avoiding archaic signs, makes a central octave of the Ionic alphabet A B Γ, &c., in continuous descent, A being the double-sharp and B the sharp of Γ (so that row no. 3 is the diatonic note-series). Alypius calls the first notation 'vocal', the second 'instrumental'; but, although these names are too well established in modern usage to be abandoned now, the distinction is pointless and was adopted only in late antiquity.2 The 'vocal notation' is obviously a translation of the 'instrumental', with its obsolete cipher, into the familiar and consecutive series of the Ionic alphabet, which was gradually spreading into common use from the end of the fifth century B.C.

The nucleus of the 'instrumental' signs stands logically enough on the System's series a 1-A, which is just as we should have expected, and we may hope that the alphabetic disorder of the other signs dates back without change to the fourth century. The 'vocal' notation, however, has been much reshuffled.3 Its most important segment is the erect Ionic alphabet, with the two or three triads adjacent, which together supply all signs found in our 'vocal' texts. Its serial order is certainly correct, but the question is whether the group has been bodily shifted from its original segment on the diatonic note-series. The erect nuclear alphabet is irrationally set on the meaningless

1 See above, pp. 346 f., n. 1.

2 e.g., in the Berlin papyrus (after A.D. 156): not in the Delphic Hymns (second century B.C.).

3 In ex. 309 above, the nucleus of the System's note-series is marked by continuous bars, additions or displacements by dotted bars. Bits of five alphabetic sequences have been patched together where three would have sufficed.

Page 409

360

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

octave f1–f; and where we should expect a translation of the ‘instru-

mental’ nucleus a1–A, we find displaced signs at either end of this

note-series. On a1 and g1 are two signs torn from their proper sequence

(in the lower register), like a rubble filling between a1 and f1. At G

and F, below A, that sequence is prolonged by two additional

letter-forms (which also appear as additions to the ‘instrumental’

notation). On its top g11 the notation abruptly decants a solitary

omega. From these and other anomalies we are bound to suspect

that the erect central alphabet, with its neighbours, may have suffered

a shift of tonal sequence—that it was not originally set on the f1–f

octave. On the assumption that past music was commonly written

and read, such a shift might seem impossible. But notation was

known to few, as the laborious verbal descriptions of Alypius show;

and it was used by theorists as a mere numerical cipher for tonoi of

no real pitch-value. Certain theoretical aberrations of late authors

do, in fact, strengthen the suspicion of a shift of the erect alphabet

to f1–f.

(1) Alypius and his kind do not present tonoi as scales revolving

about the System (as in Ex. 308), but simply as continuous double-

octave scales at semitonal intervals. We may imagine them on the

pianoforte, if we exclude all idea of real pitch. The Alypian note-

series extends over fifteen of such tonoi. As Ptolemy argues, tonoi

set at or beyond the octave are logically superfluous. Of the three

extra tonoi of Alypius, one was added to round off the octave, and

the other two merely to complete a set of tonos-names in triplicate

(with the prefixes hypo- and hyper-). The logical note-series would

run from top g1 to bottom A. The extra bottom notes G and F

can only be the additions to that note-series which were made to

accommodate the three superfluous tonoi.1 Since the tonoi were

mere names and the signs mere ciphers, it did not matter at which

end either were added. In fact, the new tonos-names were put at

the top of the list and the new signs at the bottom. Consequently

the old tonos-names, in their conventional order, were shunted two

diatonic degrees down the notational series: i.e. the bottom tonos

called Hypodorian, to make room for the new tonoi at the top, was

pushed from the old terminal A down to the new terminal F.2

(2) Since the tonoi are A-scales, the tonos that begins from A of the

notational series, whatever its name, will be the ‘natural’ tonos (i.e.

1 Alypius’ Hyperlydian, Hyperaeolian, Hyperphrygian. The fourth so accommodated

(Hyperionian, mese = g#1) was placed top of twelve semitonal tonoi (from A), but the

notation has no corresponding top g#1: it was extended at the bottom instead.

2 See Ex. 310 below.

Page 410

that in which the signs keep their unsharpened forms). In the shifted

Alypian tonos-list, the tonos that falls on the A is called ‘Hypolydian’.

Now in both the Alypian notations, the Hypolydian tonos has the

‘natural’ signs. It has been supposed that there was a real and musical

change from a ‘Dorian’ to a ‘Hypolydian’ tuning. But this view

is based on the modern assumption of absolute pitch. If it is not

accepted the change can be simply interpreted as a diagrammatic

shift of tonos-names; and this is perhaps confirmed by a reference

in late antiquity to ‘the tonos now called Hypolydian’.1

(3) But this was not all. Ptolemy, in arguing against the habit of

interposing tonoi on the semitones between the diatonic series,

pointed out that there was a risk of transposing the whole System—

since the central octave of the System does not coincide with the

terminals of any octave of these interposed tonoi. In the correct pro-

jection of Ex. 308 the ‘natural’ tonos was the Dorian, which shared

the System’s own central register at the thetic mi1–mi. But if we take

the seven primary tonoi, to which the names of the species belong,

and reproduce them with the sharps and flats assigned to them by

Alypius, they appear as follows:

Ex. 310

Mesae: Eb S D T C T Bb S A T G T F

=Natural Series: F E D C B A G

These tonoi, while preserving the same natural sequence ( =

FEDCBAG) are projected at EbDCBbAGF instead of the correct

DC# BAG# F# E of Ex. 308 above. In other words, these theorists

1 ps.-Plutarch, De musica 39, 1.

Page 411

362

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

have not contained their tonoi within the System's basic scale a'-A.1 They have simply started their bottom Hypodorian tonos on an extra-Systematic bottom F, and proceeded accordingly. If they were to extend the basic scale at all, they should have started their Hypodorian on a low D. As it was, the Lydian was pushed up from its old C# to the old Mixolydian position of higher d. In the confusion the Mixolydian name drops out of the later list, and the Lydian is often treated as 'the first of the tonoi'.2 From the false projection it follows inevitably that the Hypolydian tonos, from its place in the list, falls on the System's thetic a'-A previously occupied by the Dorian.

So far, it might be more accurate to say that they were not relating their tonoi to the System at all, but merely ignoring it. But when they had to find the species known as synonymous with these primary tonoi, they got into trouble with their central octave. On their projection the one octave common to these tonoi—the octave in which the species lie—is not, as before, the central mi'-mi, but fa'-fa. This is a real error of construction. The scale-form of the Alypian tonoi is still the la'-mi'-mi-la of the System's proper scale, which corresponds to the Dorian species mi'-mi, and should fall on the central octave mi'-mi. But Alypius' primary seven tonoi are placed to fall on the central octave fa'-fa, which corresponds to the Hypolydian species and conflicts with the scale-form of the tonoi themselves. It is not to be regarded as a reflection of musical practice, but only as a gross theoretical misunderstanding from the period of the Greek mathematical decadence.

Now it is hard to escape the conclusion that these theorists, having landed themselves with a 'natural' Hypolydian tonos and a 'natural' central octave fa'-fa, thought it necessary to place the 'natural' erect alphabet of the 'vocal' notation upon the corresponding octave of the Hypolydian species—f'-f of the note-series. The 'instrumental' notation, being alphabetically unintelligible, may have escaped interference; but the Ionic letters, which were also used as numerical notation, were peculiarly subject to such treatment. Their position in Alypius reflects the theoretical error.

Once the Alypian notation was established in theory, it will also have been used for transcribing real music. But it is not so certain

1 They actually read scales upwards, and counted them from the bottom terminals. In Ex. 308 above, one tonos (Hypolydian) is inevitably extra-systematic at its terminals, but there tonoi are properly counted from the Mesoe, and the common central octave is the logically important feature.

2 Among others, Alypius 3: ὡς ἐστὶ πρῶτος ὁ λύδιος. Some echo of controversy as to whether the Mixolydian should be on high or low D may be preserved in the scholium on Aristophanes, Clouds 967-8.

Page 412

to apply to our earliest documents in 'vocal' notation. The mistake postulates the addition of the bottom G and F for new tonoi, and the set of fifteen was believed to be comparatively late. The notation known to Aristoxenus cannot have been consistently related to the embryonic and divergent tonos-lists that he describes; and we have no means of knowing when it was adapted, as we find it in late antiquity, to the purpose of writing out tonos-scales. What is evident is that, apart from the modern hypothesis of absolute pitch-keys, the extended Alypian series in its two notations absurdly exceeds any conceivable requirements of musical practice. All that was needed to transcribe a melody was a convenient nucleus of signs (with their triadic sharps) in a sequence which could be used at any desired register. There is a strong a priori probability that, as in the 'instrumental' notation, so in the 'vocal' version of it, the fourth-century nucleus was the fifteen-note System a1–A. This would require a reversed alphabet above the erect alphabet. But otherwise we can only try to pick out fixed notes, in Greek musical documents, by reference not to theoretical tonoi but to indications (if any) of melodic structure and function. A suggestion, here to be put forward with all reservations, must be taken only as a lead towards further study.

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

(1) The 'First Delphic Hymn' or paean to Apollo (our most extensive piece) was composed almost certainly in the later second century B.C., and written in the 'vocal' notation on stone at Delphi, where it must have won a prize in the Pythian festival. From the ceremony of its occasion and from the clichés of its literary style, it seems to be highly academic and archaistic stuff; and where academic rules were observed at all, they were unlikely to have changed much since Aristoxenus. On this assumption, Aristoxenian principles may be applied, first, to the schematic note-series of the Hymn (below, I is the transcription according to the Alypian signs, II a hypothetical new version):1

Ex. 311

1 The notational sharps are here set above the 'natural' signs, and are transcribed by black notes.

Page 413

364

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

There are two pykna on υ and M, which, therefore, are fixed notes, and, being a fifth apart, should be paramese and hypate (i.e. in the mere abstract schema, for in melody modulation could vary their functions). Mese would then be Γ, which must lie a whole tone below paramese υ. In Aristoxenus' extant treatment the tonal location for such a schema would equate hypate with our mi; and this brings the first alphabetic triad A B Γ to our la, where the nucleus of signs a1–A also starts in the 'instrumental' notation. Against the usual transcription (I) it may be pointed out that (i) the key-signature of Eb, not here reproduced, but commonly inserted from modernized tonos-scales, is spurious, for in this version of the score itself the B is always natural; and (ii) by this transcription the composer is twice made to break an Aristoxenian rule of melodic grammar which forbids a progression from a pyknon to an interval less than a tone (Ex. 312 below, §§ 45–48, 60–61). The new transcription (II) avoids this error. As to the pykna, the sharp-sign × here implies no choice between enharmonic dieses and chromatic; but at this date the chromatic genus is to be presumed. If so, the lichanos will be nearer fa♯ than fa, but in any case a movable note cannot be transcribed exactly.1 The continuous parts of the paean are here transcribed both in the Alypian reading (I) and in the version here suggested (II):2

Ex. 312

1 Aristoxenus, Harmonics 23: the 'shades' of lichanos could not have been indicated by notation.

2 Restorations are omitted. The repeated notes and time-values of the usual transcriptions may be plausible, but are inferential. Reinach's transcription of the Alypian notation is recorded in The History of Music in Sound (H.M.V.), i, side 15.

Page 414

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

365

15 I

M Y M Y M F ϕ Y F

Φοοî-βου ωi-δαεî-οι μελ-ψn-τε χρν-σε-ο-κό-μav

II

19 I

Θ U Λ U Θ U M Θ I

ὡς ἀ-và δι-κό-ρν-βa Παρ-vaσ-oi-δos ταâς δε πιε-τέ-ρας

II

23 I

M Y Y M Y M I Θ I Θ Γ U Λ Γ

ε-δραν ἀμ' ἁγa-κλν-ταιîς Δεελ-φι-ουv Ka-oτα-λι-δos

II

27 I

U Λ U Θ Γ Λ M Y

εοὐ-ὕ-δρου vá-ματ' ἐπ-ε-vί-σe-τaι, Δεελ-φòv ἀ-và πρῶ-va

II

31 I

M I Θ I M ϕ Γ U Λ U

μαav-τεiê-ov ἐφ-έ-πτωv πά-γου . . . κλυτὰ με-γα-λό-πο-λis

II

36 I

ΛΘ-θis εὐ-xaιεî-σι φε-ρό-πλοι vai-ou-σα Τρι-

II

40 I

U Λ U Θ Γ M Γ B Γ Λ K Γ O M

τωω-vi-δos δάπe-δov ἀ-θρα-vο-τοv ἀ-γι-οιs διέ-βω-μουοî-οv

II

44 I

Γ K M Λ K M Λ M O K Λ

'Α-φas-otos aiεί-θei νέ-ωv μῆ-πα ταoú-ρwv, ὅμ-οvθ'

II

Page 415

366

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

47

I

Γ M U Θ I Θ Γ Θ Y O M A M O

δε νυ Α - ραφ ά - πμός és 'Ol-νμ - πον άν - α - κ' - δνα - ται,

II

53

I

Y O M A M Λ K Λ M M Y O M

λι - γὺ δε λω - τοὺς βρέ - μων aeì - ó - λοισι μὲ - λε - σιν ὠι - δαὶν

II

57

I

Λ · M Γ Λ K Λ M K Λ M O Y

κρέ - κει, χρυ - σέ - α δ' αὔ - θ' ὑ - θρους κίθαρσι ὑ - μνοι - σιν

II

61

I

O M Λ M O Φ U Λ Γ U Θ Γ

à - νa - μὲ - λπεια. ὅ δε τεχνι - τῶν πρό - πας ἔ - σμὸς

II

65

I

Λ U Θ Γ Λ U Λ I

μθ - οδ' λαχῶν . . . - σεις κλυ - τὸν παι - δα με - γά - λου . . .

II

72

I

I Θ Γ U Λ U Λ Γ Λ U Λ Γ

à - κρο - νι - φῆ τόν - δε πί - γον . . . πᾶ - οι θνα - τοῖς:

II

77

I

U Γ M Y M I M I Θ Γ Θ

προ - φαι - νει - . . . τρì - πο - δα μαν - τει̂ - ον ὢς εἰλείδες . . .

II

82

I

Λ Γ U Λ U Φ U I O Γ Λ

ἔφρονού - ρει δρά - κων ὅ - τε τεîσι . . . ἔτρη - σas ai - ó - λον

II

Page 416

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

367

87 I

II

95 I

II

Whatever be the true reading of the signs, our schematic staff is singularly ill adapted to this music. Greek notation was also schematic; but contemporary Greeks had the advantage of understanding the music. For us it would be better rendered on a differently constructed staff, reserving black lines for the fixed notes, giving dotted (hypothetical) lines to the chief movable notes, and leaving the rest indeterminate in the spaces—as in the following sample from the Hymn (notation II), admittedly a conjectural version:1

Ex. 313

34 ff. . 〈ην〉 κλυτα μνγα λο — πολ‹ις› Αθ‹ω›ις ευχα‹ι›(‹ι›σ‹ι›) φε — ρο — π‹ι›λο‹ι›ο και — ο‹υ› — σα

Τριτω-ω-νυ - δος δα(π‹ε›δ‹ον›) ο‹ρ›-θο‹ω›στα‹ου›. αγ — ι‹ς› δ‹ε› β‹ω›ι-οι‹ς› ο‹υ› — σ‹ι›ν Α — φαι — στα‹ς›

αι — ει — θ‹ε›ι ν‹ε›ων μ‹η›ρα τα — ου — ρ‹ω›ν, ομου — ου δ‹ε› ν‹ι›νυ Α — πα‹ψ› α — ι‹μ›ος ε‹ς›

1 Here, and in examples below, speech-accents are omitted, as their application to different dialects and periods is very uncertain. See, however, the new and careful discussion by R. P. Winnington-Ingram in Symbolae Osloenses, xxxi (1955), pp. 64-73.

Page 417

368

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

Θ Ρ Ο M Α MΟ Ρ Ο M Α M Α K Α M M Υ

Oλυμ-που αν-α - κι-δυναται. λε-ηυ δε λωτοςσ βρε-μων αειο-λοι-οις (μυε) λε-σω

b a ?f# e ?d B

Υ Γ

I M O

Φ

O M Α M Γ Α K Γ M K Α M O Υ O M Α M O

ωι-δαυν κρεκει' θρυ-σεα δ' α-δυ-θρους κτιθα-ρπς ν-μνοι - σιν α-να-μελ - πι-ται.

b a ?f# e ?d B

Υ Γ

I M O

Φ

Θ U Α U Θ U Θ M Υ Υ M Υ M I Θ I Θ

. . . ος αυα δι - κο - ρπυν βα Παρνασσοι-δος εδραν αμοι αγα-κλυ-ταιεις Δε-ελ-φι-στ-ι-σω

b a ?f# e ?d B

Υ Γ

I M O

Φ

Γ U Α Γ U Α U Θ Γ Α M Υ

Kα - στα - λι - δος εου - ν - δρου ναματ' επινισσεται Δελφον ανα πρωωννα

b a ?f# e ?d B

Υ Γ

I M O

Φ

M I Θ I M Φ

μα-αν-τε-ι-ου εφεπων παγον.

b a ?f# e ?d B

Υ Γ

I M O

Φ

Do we learn anything of Greek music from this piece, admittedly a last breath from the dissolution of a silver age? Modulations—of which much has been written—we must not pretend to understand. The use of progressions is visible rather than intelligible to us. Yet we can see the rapid decorative effects of the pykna at KΑM or *ΑU, and the tremolo or variation of notes on one syllable—once parodied by Aristophanes as a new trick of Euripides and the modern dithyrambists,

Page 418

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

369

but now become a cliché. In the fourth century, ‘programme music’ had

been popularized by Timotheus, whose lyric nome The Persae featured

sound-effects of the battle of Salamis. In this Hymn, at §§ 45 and 55, the

words αἰείθει and αἰειολοῖς are set to imitate the flickering of flames and

the tremolo of an aulos. We may reasonably believe that the style pre-

served some echo of the tradition of Timotheus, which was just dying.

(2) The ‘Second Delphic Hymn’—a long but battered inscription

in the ‘instrumental’ notation—was composed by an unknown

Limenius of Athens in 128–127 B.C. Although the setting seems even

sparser, this paean is to us, at least, stylistically indistinguishable

from the other; and their likeness encourages the belief that the

notations are not hopelessly corrupt. The second Hymn shows no signs

of any such shift of tonal sequence as must be suspected in the ‘vocal’

notation of the first. It will be sufficiently illustrated by two extracts:

Apollo’s advent at Delphi, and a final prayer for the Roman empire:

Ex. 314

(i)

(ii)

(3) Our only other engraved musical document is the ‘Epitaph of

Seikilos’—an inscription beginning with an elegiac couplet, on a

tombstone found at Aidin in Turkey, near Tralles.1 The Greek

script might date from the second century B.C., but is probably

much later. The convention of musicography differs sharply from

that of the Delphic pieces, and approximates to that of papyri of

the first, second, or later centuries A.D., in which every syllable is

1 At the moment of going to press it is reported that the stone, which had been

lost since 1923, has reappeared. This transcription may, therefore, be subject to re-

vision in detail.

B 3808

B b

Page 419

370

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

set and rhythmic signs are introduced. It is possible, therefore, that

the song was transcribed according to the Alypian values of the

notation, although its diatonic banality in this transcription is dis-

concerting. It has commonly been assigned to the 'Ionian tonos',

whose note-series in Alypian theory overlaps its own:

Ex. 315

But in the song(Ex. 316 below),1 the opening fifth CZ, if it is intelli-

gible at all, must surely be a main progression between fixed notes—

whereas in the tonos C and Z are movable notes. There is no musical

relation between the two. The usual solution is to postulate a 'Phry-

gian mode' for the song, and thus to combine the hypothesis of

absolute pitch-value with the hypothesis that the octave-species of

harmonic theory represented a multimodality of music. But even if

the transcription is correct, enough has been said to suggest that the

interpretation of Greek music in terms of theoretical octave-struc-

tures may be unhistorical. A particular range of signs may have been

chosen to indicate, not an absolute pitch, but a special temperament

of intervals, or by force of musicographical habit.

Ex. 316

1 Recorded in The History of Music in Sound, i, side 15.

Page 420

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS 371

In our uncertainty about the notation, the chief interest of the piece must lie in its rhythmography. Of the rhythmic signs the dot or stigme (marking the strong beat of the metric foot) and the bracket (linking groups of notes) have no time-value. The unit of time (protos chronos) is left unmarked; the diseme ∪ is equivalent to two time-units, and the triseme ∪ to three. Now, whereas the four lines of the verse have respectively 9, 11, 11, and 11 metric units (in 5, 7, 8, and 9 syllables), each line of the music has twelve rhythmic units.1 In ordinary Greek melopoeia, although a long metric syllable sometimes counted for more than two short ones, the length of musical lines was determined simply by the words of the verse, and a piece was commonly written out like prose, not in lines. In the Seikilos song, on the contrary, a uniform time-scheme is imposed on irregular verses by the music. It is a warning that breeds of music alien to the orthodox tradition might exist among the mixed populations of a superficially Hellenized world—and nobody can guess what sort of music a well-to-do Asiatic Greek might have chosen for the grave-stone of a female relative.

Although we have no other examples of verses prolonged and determined by the musical line, we know from a scholium (probably of late antiquity) that ‘the verse is not completed by the metric line alone: it puts a full stop to its movement only when the lyre stops sounding’.2 We also have what sounds like a description of Seikilos’ metric scheme—but strangely misapplied to an incompatible verse-form—in the Byzantine annotation to some musical setting of a Greek poem on a sundial, known from the thirteenth-century Ottoboni Codex 59:3 ‘The tropos is the Lydian; the rhythm is of twelve beats (δωδεκάσημος). . . . Taking the line as a whole, the rhythm is of twelve beats, for the verse has eleven syllables, but (since the line is for twelve syllables, and there is one beat missing) the last syllable of each verse counts for three time-beats.’ A rhythmic time-scheme of twelve-beat lines with three beats on the final syllables corresponds to Seikilos’ song, and might possibly be taken from some ancient treatise on rhythm; but the Byzantine annotator, who scanned verse by syllables not quantities, has attempted to relate it to a regular hendecasyllabic poem which will not fit it, and has counted wrong.

(4) This Byzantine annotation, whatever it means, is directly

1 For a recent transcription and analysis see E. Martin, Trois documents de musique grecque (Paris, 1953). He divides each line into four sections of three beats.

2 Scholium to Dionysius Thrax (Bekker, Anecdota Graeca, ii, p. 751).

3 See Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Griechische Verskunst (Leipzig, 1921), pp. 595 ff.; 599–600 (no. 4).

Page 421

372

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

connected with the problem of the famous musical documents first published by Vincenzo Galilei in 1581: the Hymns to the Muse (two poems run together), to the Sun, and to Nemesis. They were transmitted among ancient and Byzantine treatises of musical theory: so, too, were the metrically similar poems which are copied in the Ottoboni Codex without the music itself, but with Byzantine annotations on musical settings of the poems to Nature, to Isis, and on a Sundial. The two groups therefore had a common source. As to the words, modern scholars accept the Byzantine attribution of the poems on Nemesis and on the Sun, at least, to Hadrian's celebrated court musician Mesomedes (second century A.D.).1 But the music is another question. It certainly existed by the thirteenth century: the question whether it was ancient in origin or a Byzantine reconstruction, undertaken as an exercise in ancient notation, may be stated as follows:

(i) Mesomedes—as Byzantine scholars knew—published a collection of his 'kitharoedic nomes'.2 But since these poems are choral hymns, not nomes, the hypothesis that they were transmitted from that collection is unfounded.

(ii) The Galilei pieces are preceded in both our two archetypal codices by a tenth-century theoretical treatise addressed to Constantine Porphyrogenitus by one Dionysius, who was editing or emulating the ancient treatise of Bacchius—a work containing Greek notation.3

(iii) The extreme rarity of rhythmic signs in these pieces is in striking contrast with all known pieces so late as Mesomedes.

(iv) The Byzantine annotation cited above from the Ottoboni Codex certainly cannot refer to an ancient setting of the poem to which it is attached. Firstly, it is metrically impossible. Secondly, whereas the other poems might well have been written for singing, this is an epigrammatic conceit upon a sundial, of a literary genre quite alien to music. The idea that it could have been intended as a song is absurd. Therefore (unless the annotation has been somehow displaced) in this case at least the music was a subsequent and artificial addition. In the other cases, taken singly, an ancient origin cannot be disproved; but since the six pieces were evidently transmitted together, it is doubtful.

(v) Mesomedes was a famous figure in Byzantine minds, and Byzantine theorists understood the Alypian notation. In four cases

1 G. Martellotti, Mesomede (Rome, 1929).

2 Dio Cassius LXxvii 12 (transmitted by the Byzantine excerptor Xiphilinus).

3 For the date of Dionysius' iambics see P. Maas in Byzantinische Zeitschrift, xii (1903). p. 273.

Page 422

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

373

the annotator has interpreted the tropos of the settings as Lydian or Hypolydian by reference to the notational signs of late Greek theoretical tonoi (called by Alypius tropoi). Therefore Dionysius or his successors had the knowledge to attempt such settings in ancient notation for poems attributed to Mesomedes. A subsidiary point is that red ink is used, as it was for Byzantine notation.

(vi) The correspondence of speech-accents with melodic rise and fall is hardly consistent enough to prove an ancient origin.

The probability, then, perhaps seems to favour an erudite Byzantine reconstruction. On the most cautious estimate, we must refrain from basing any idea of the composer Mesomedes of Crete upon these curious emissions. We can be sure only that he was a kitharoede of extraordinary virtuosity. In that period of sentimental Hellenic revivals he got a public salary; he was docked of it by Hadrian's successor, on the ground that a musician was a useless member of society; but the amateur strummer Caracalla afterwards built him a mausoleum. His immortality may have been fraudulently perpetuated by the Galilei pieces: yet, since these pieces (whatever their origin) have excited the interest of European scholars for centuries, a sample from the Hymn to Nemesis is here given in the usual transcription.

Ex. 317

~ I M M M M M I M M I C P M

Nέμ - ε - σι. πτε - ρό - εσ - σa βi - ου ρο - πá,

φ M Z Z Z E Z I Z M

κν - a - νiώ - πi θє - à θú - γa - τєρ Δik - as,

M U U U E Z EΛ U

ä коû - φa φρν - á - γµα - τa θνa - τŵν

U U M I U Z E I M M

єπ - є́ - χєις ä - δá - µαν - τι χα - λi - νŵ,

M M M M M M M C M M φ

є - χθον - σα δ' ύ - βριn ό - λo - àνυ βρο - τŵν

P C φ P P . . . . .

µє́ - λa - va φθó - νov є́ктòς є̇λaúнєıs.

(5) Of papyrus fragments in Greek notation, the most considerable so far published is a Christian hymn from Oxyrhynchus, transcribed

Page 423

374

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

in the third century A.D.; but since its melody is now recognized to

belong to the oriental tradition of the Early Church, it lies beyond

the scope of this chapter.1

From other papyri we have the following fragments:2 (i) a Zenon

papyrus (Cairo), c. 250 B.C.: a few words (? from a tragedy); (ii) a

Rainer papyrus (Vienna), 250–150 B.C.: lines 339–45 from Euripides’

Orestes; (iii) a papyrus (Berlin) inscribed after A.D. 156 with parts of

(a) twelve lines of a paean, (b) a brief example without words,

(c) four lines of verse (? tragic) addressing Ajax, (d) a brief example

without words, (e) half a lyric line. These are cited only as fragments,

and are best explained as examples composed to illustrate musical

declamation, rhythm, &c., from some theoretical treatise,3 (f) P. Oslo-

ensis 1413. It contains two separate pieces in nineteen lines of text

(all incomplete, some very fragmentary) with ‘vocal’ notation and

profuse rhythmical signs. The script may be of the late first or

early second century A.D. Published by Amundsen and Winnington-

Ingram in Symbolae Osloenses, 1955.

(6) Two considerable fragments await publication:

(i) P. Michiganensis Inv. 2958. The papyrus, of the second

century A.D., contains twenty-five fragmentary lines, of

which 1–8 and 10–25 consist of Greek text with notation

above, while line 9 is of notation without words.4

(ii) An Oxyrhynchus papyrus from Oxford.5

The papyri hitherto published are problems of palaeography rather

than objects of musical history. All are too brief or too broken for

assured analysis; and not all their rhythmic signs are fully understood.

What is more certain is that music in Roman imperial times was

distinguished from Alexandrian music by explicit rhythmical mark-

ing, which in all but our earliest pieces (the Zenon papyrus and the

Delphic stones) replaces unaided interpretation of rhythm by the

verse-metre.6 In the first century B.C., as Dionysius of Halicarnassus

1 Egon Wellesz, ‘The earliest example of Christian hymnody’, in Classical Quarterly xxxix (1945), pp. 34–45 ff. See vol. ii, p. 4.

2 Jan, Musici Scriptores Graeci, supplement (Leipzig, 1899); Reinach, La Musique grecque (Paris, 1926), appendix; Mountford, ‘Greek Music in the Papyri and Inscriptions’, in Powell and Barber, New Chapters in Greek Literature, ii (Oxford, 1933), and

‘A New Fragment of Greek Music in Cairo’ in Journal of Hellenic Studies, li (1931), pp. 91 ff. E. G. Turner has re-dated the Orestes papyrus; see Bibliography, pp. 496–7.

3 Mountford, however, regards the papyrus as part of an anthology.

4 Information courteously supplied by Prof. Youtie and Dr. Pearl of Michigan.

5 Information courteously supplied by Mr. Winnington-Ingram.

6 On Greek metric (too complex a subject for discussion here) see works cited in Bibliography, II. 6.

Page 424

THE EXTANT MUSICAL DOCUMENTS

375

implies, music normally followed the rise and fall of speech. This was impossible in the classical music, where a strophe was melodically repeated by an antistrophe. How far it occurred in late antiquity we can seldom be sure, since the accent of words is too imperfectly represented by the Alexandrian signs which we use, and the pitch-accent was in any case being replaced by stress. But we know that in the second century A.D., when crowds would flock to hear a sophist speak Greek correctly and beautifully, these rhetorical performances were accompanied by academic study of rhythm.1 So passionate an interest in declamation must have influenced music generally, and may account for the attention paid to rhythm in late antiquity. A school of rhythmic theorists grew up beside the classical metricists, working on other principles. In a philosophical treatise—strangely compounded of neoplatonic speculation, notational lore, and garbled musical antiquarianism—the otherwise unknown writer Aristides Quintilianus speaks of rhythmical matters with some realism, which may reflect the art of his own age, and at some length, which certainly reflects the contemporary interest.2

Such writers, however, cannot help us towards an understanding of contemporary music, as Aristoxenus does for an earlier epoch. In their textbooks nothing is more depressing than the fossilization of the doctrine of melopoeia—musical composition—as a mere branch of theoretical terminology. The writer dubiously named ‘Cleonides’, professing the doctrine then claimed as ‘Aristoxenian’, first defines metabole as change from one tonos or systema or genus to another; then he adds that ‘in melopoeia’, metabole is something different—a change from an expansive mood (ethos) to a mood of contraction or of calm, &c.3 But his second definition has no more to do with real music than his first. It is only ‘ethical’ speculation overlaid with the academic terms of the professional rhetoricians. He illustrates it with a list of examples of the ‘calm ethos’: hymns, paeans, encomia, and symbulae. Now the symbulē or deliberation was not a musical form at all, but a regular exercise of the rhetorical schools. It has crept into a purely conventional list of musical forms under influence of the habit of applying musical terms to oratory, which may, indeed, have been the most serious use of music for an educated mind in this age. These later sources preserve little more from the musical past than a few

1 Plutarch (Ti. Gracchus 2) reflects academic rhetorical practice of his own day in the absurd legend that C. Gracchus' speeches were accompanied by a wind-instrument.

2 For a fresh estimate of Aristides we await the edition of R. P. Winnington-Ingram, now in preparation.

3 Isagoge 13-14.

Page 425

376

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

technical terms which have lost such meaning as they may ever have had. 'Cleonides' produces agoge for conjunct motion, ploke for dis-

junct, tone for a sustained note, petteia for a note struck repeatedly. Petteia was apparently a metaphor from the repeated click-click of

pieces on a draughts-board. But Aristides Quintilianus, who also knows the word, misinterprets the metaphor as a reference to the

draughts-player's strategy, and defines petteia as the choice of notes in composition.1 It has no musical context for either writer: the one

repeats what he has read, the other makes a wrong etymological guess. None of these theorists think of describing current principles by

which we might analyse our later musical documents.

For the most part, however, written documents of music had never existed. It is not from fragments nor from harmonic theorists that we

can hope to gain an idea of its historical character. The best sources are the earliest—poets who were also composers and critics who were

also musicians. They cannot reveal what Greek music might have meant to us, but on the question what it meant to the Greeks their

evidence is the clearest that we have.

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

(i) Music in Homer's Greece. By the end of the eighth century B.C. Greece was a land where 'beggar bears spite to beggar, and bard to

bard'.2 Such jealous professionals sang epics like the Iliad to their own lyre—phorminx or kitharis—freely adapting a conventional reci-

tative style, with an initial appeal to the divine muse who possessed them to sing.3 They came, as Homer shows, of a society whose twin-

born music and poetry were already mature, consciously removed from the primitive, barbaric, or rustic. Not all Greek music was skilled

art, but we know nothing of a period before a skilled art existed.

Music was early practised as an ingredient of magical medicine; its festival occasions and its formal conventions were often religious;

but the line between the religious and the secular was differently drawn in antiquity. In the Iliad music already has the status of an art over

and above a mere ritual; and the Greek tradition remained human-

istic, anti-liturgical, swiftly sensitive to social or mental change. Gods as well as men daily demanded new music. The old was remem-

bered in the classical period as a model and as a possession for ever, but not as a rite to be reiterated. There is no adequate foundation for

1 II. 17 J. Some scholars, however, prefer Aristides' definition.

2 Hesiod, Works and Days, 25–26.

3 Cf. the pose of Phemius (Od. xxii. 345 f.): 'I am self-taught and God has planted in me all kinds of song.'

Page 426

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC 377

recent interpretations of Greek musical ‘modes’ as groups of melodic formulae, on Indian, Jewish, or Byzantine analogies: Byzantine composers could never have been personally parodied as Athenian composers were. In competitive individualism, at least, classical Greek music was nearer to modern Europe. It was an accomplishment open to all talents. The gods of Agamemnon’s army not only receive music from mortals but make it at their own banquets, to Apollo’s phorminx; and on earth, not only the paid professional but the lord Achilles sings epics of the renowns of warriors to his own phorminx for his pleasure.1 This ideal of a music respected among an aristocracy by practice, as well as by patronage, reached its fullest expression in fifth-century Athens. There were, however, higher and lower classes of music. On a sleepless night Agamemnon, looking across from his tent to Troy, heard the skirling of oboes and pipes in the besieged Phrygian city.2 The aulos and the syrinx, though common to Greece, were later thought to be Asiatic imports beside the pure Hellenic lyra, kithara or phorminx; and two rival musics were symbolized in the legend of the Greek Apollo flaying the Phrygian satyr-aulete Marsyas. But in the Iliad the wind-instruments are rustic and popular rather than alien. Paris, being a prince of Troy, plays the aristocratic kitharis.3 Common folk may also use the aulos, and shepherds the syrinx—the pipes of the satyr Pan. Dionysus, to whom the aulos later became what the lyre was to Apollo, is not yet among the Olympian élite of Homer’s gods; and Homer’s heroes sing the Apolline paeans, not the Dionysian dithyrambs.

It is in the Odyssey that we find the apotheosis of the professional kitharoedic bard. Semi-divine beings like the Sirens, the nightingale, or Circe are allowed to sing; but music is otherwise monopolized by the resident minstrel. He has become a self-conscious ornament of noble households, and claims, although a servant, that recognition of genius which Pindar could still demand of a later aristocracy. The bard in the story—Phemius in Odysseus’ manor or Demodocus in Alcinous’ palace—is deliberately dramatized as a secondary hero, and incidentally used to introduce compliments to the musical profession as an indispensable asset of good dining.4 He sings epics of warriors or love-stories of gods; he advertises his forthcoming works; he also performs for dancers in athletic contests. In Homeric and classical times music included not only poetry but often dancing as

1 Il. i. 472 and 601 ff.; xxii. 391; ix. 186 ff.

2 Il. x. 13.

3 Il. iii. 54. The precise difference between kitharis and phorminx at this date is unknown. The terms kithara and lyra are later.

4 Cf. Od. viii. 73 and 261 ff.; i. 337 ff.; xxiv. 197; &c.

Page 427

378

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

well. As the sung word expressed the intonation, so the beat of the dancing foot (sometimes marked by castanets) expressed the rhythm.1 The bard advances into a dancing-ground (chorus or orchestra) and the youths dance time to his song. If a dance is performed without song—as was the famous Phaeacian ball-throwing dance—there is no music either: the rhythm is conducted by the hand-claps of the spectators, or by the arms of Nausicaa dancing among her maids.2

For the music of the archaic community as a whole we must return to the earlier, less self-assertive Homer of the Iliad. He describes, for instance, the form of the dirge sung over Hector's body. Professional bards begin the lamentation, after which a chorus of women keens; then Hector's widow Andromache, his mother Hecuba, and his sister-in-law Helen take up their laments in turn, with a keening of women after each.3 Improvisations set within a formal sequence may still have been the structure of the dirges known to Plato. Almost every social occasion also had its song—often a more or less traditional elaboration of some simple cry like the Ailinon ('alas for Linus!') in an ancient and celebrated harvesting-shanty, or the Hymen O Hymenaee of the wedding-hymns.4 Some of this music is set into scenes on the Shield of Achilles. Here girls with garlands and boys with knives, holding hands, dance in rings or in rows to the song of a bard with a lyre, while two acrobats turn somersaults at the beginning of each verse or strain.5 In other scenes, a boy with a lyre sings the 'Linus' at the vintage; two shepherds play the pastoral syrinx to their flocks; and a wedding-feast is celebrated with the chant Hymen-aeus and the dancing of boys to auloi and lyres.6

These scenes, though drawn from real experience, are as artfully idealized as Gongora's poetic pictures of country life. They give us the context of the archaic lyrical music which went on beside the grand style of the epic with its tales of the gods and heroes.

(ii) The Music of the Early Lyrics. Down to the mid-fifth century B.C., sophisticated poets composed songs of skilled art but of popular inspiration—songs for such daily doings as dances of young girls or fighting men, weddings, funerals, processions, wars, drinking-bouts; love-songs and songs of political or private hate. This lyric move-

1 A metric foot is a term borrowed from dancing. For castanets see Hom. Hymn. iii. 162.

2 Od. viii. 261 ff.; ibid. 370 ff.; vi. 100 ff.

3 Il. xxiv. 720 ff.

4 On the Linus-song (which did not explain who Linus was nor why he was mourned) see Frazer, Golden Bough, vii. 216. See also above, p. 251.

5 Il. xviii. 590 ff. Acrobats also in Od. iv. 17 ff.

6 Il. xviii. 491 ff., 525 ff., 561 ff.

Page 428

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

379

ment sprang from Ionian Greece, and found its first great metropolis

in Sparta, whose aristocracy was still Homeric enough to love good

music next to good fighting. Its early stages are extremely hard to

trace. The attribution of extant poems is often in doubt, the dates of

composers in confusion. Musical history was first reconstructed in

the fourth century B.C. by Glaucus of Rhegium, whose work is known

chiefly through an unintelligent source of late antiquity, the pseudo-

Plutarchian De musica.1 No subject is more confused by legend and

invention. The main sources were local histories compiled from the

later fifth century onwards; and these records, to judge from the many

ancient doubts and divergences on the dates of archaic poets, must

have been either unreliable or sketchy. The musical victories of early

poets in local or Panhellenic festivals may have been interpolated

into the annals by the competing vanities of Greek cities. It was

claimed that a Pythian festival of music was held at Delphi long

before the official Pythian era (582 B.C.), and a high though hazy

antiquity was also ascribed to musical contests at the Spartan Carnea.

None were included in the indubitably ancient Olympian Games, and

Homer knows no more than musical accompaniments to athletics or

dances. Even if musicians began so early to compete for their own

prizes, no firm chronology was transmitted from these events.

Festival music consisted of epic declamation and poetic forms

dedicated to particular deities. The ‘Pythian Nome’ for Apollo was

a composition or genre on the set theme of Apollo and the Dragon

(or Python), which still recurs in the extant Delphic paeans of the

second century B.C., and which was revived by sixteenth-century

pioneers of Italian opera.2 The Delphic contest of auletes originated,

according to Pindar, in an archaic ‘Many-headed Nome’ on the

theme of Perseus slaying the Gorgon. The dithyramb probably began

in the sixth century B.C. as a recital of the Birth of Dionysus, not

acted, but danced and sung to the aulos by a circular chorus of fifty

men or boys. It was brought to maturity, in a strophic form, by the

early classic composers, and broke away from the limits of the set

subject. No special themes were prescribed for tragedy and comedy

as we know them in the fifth century, but they may originally, like

the dithyramb, have had some particular reference to their patron

Dionysus.3 Of all these festival genres, however, no clear example

1 Ascribed to Plutarch by Weil and Reinach (ed. 1900), but no longer accepted as

his. See the edition of F. Lasserre (Paris, 1954).

2 The opinion of later authors that the original Pythian Nome was an aulos-piece

without words is hardly credible.

3 See further A. W. Pickard-Cambridge, Dithyramb, Tragedy, and Comedy (Oxford,

Page 429

380

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

has come down to us from the archaic period. Early lyric poets, while

they may also produce hymns to gods, are more concerned with the

musical occasions of ordinary private and social life than with the set

ritual narrative or drama. Even the more formal choric works of

Stesichorus, which do narrate mythological stories, were probably

designed (like Pindar's) for the personal occasions of a patron's court.

Most of the lyric genres are less grandiose. From Alcman, for instance,

we have a piece, possibly composed for two choirs, in which the poet

bandies compliments to pretty girls as they sing and dance, calling

them by their names.1 To Tyrtaeus were attributed the patriotic

marching-songs (embateria) of the Spartans, who had the unusual

habit of keeping step, and took auletes with them into battle.2 Archi-

lochus of Paros, the most famous figure of all, composed colloquial

songs—gnomic, satirical, autobiographical, and above all, convivial.

Songs called scolia, often on political subjects, were sung to an aulos

by gentlemen after dinner over their wine, each delivering one line in

turn.3 But of Archilochus' music the fifth century seems to remember

only the triple tenella kallinike—three cheers for an Olympic victor.

Pindar thought it crude stuff beside his own regal victory odes.4

What was recorded of these poets' lives was mainly inference or

romance. They were dated to the seventh century (or, in the case of

Stesichorus, variously to c. 600 and c. 485 B.C.). This patch of history

was much confused by the later Greek passion for deriving every

musical form or instrument from a First Inventor, to whom extant

works would then be apportioned.

The founder of auletic music was said to be Olympus, who was a

myth, but was credited with real archaic compositions still known

in the fourth century B.C.: e.g. a ritual libation-song (spondeion) which

used some ascending three-quarter-tone intervals—presumably re-

lated to the irrational borings of the aulos which Aristoxenus noted.5

The early aulos, of which the Argive Sacadas was the first known

virtuoso, was improved in the later fifth century by Pronomus of

Thebes or his school.6 Besides common devices for modifying notes,

1927), and The Dramatic Festivals of Athens (Oxford, 1953): the origins of these forms is

obscure.

1 Diehl, Anthologia Lyrica Graeca (Leipzig, 1942), ii., p. 7, n. 1. The interpretation

is difficult and uncertain.

2 Cf. Thuc. v. 20. Later stories that Tyrtaeus was (a) a general, (b) a music-teacher,

need not be credited.

3 Examples in Diehl, op. cit. ii, pp. 181 ff. Singers either repeated known scolia or

composed as they went.

4 Ol. ix. 1 (cf. Pyth. ii. 55).

5 See above, p. 350. On the 'spondeion scale' of ps.-Plut. De musica, see Winnington-

Ingram in Classical Quarterly, xxii (1928), pp. 83 ff.

6 No full account of Greek instruments can here be attempted. See Reinach, articles

Page 430

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

381

metal rings were used to close or half-close holes, and the number of

holes (sometimes as few as six) was raised to fifteen. Auloi were made

in five registers covering three octaves between them. They were of

wood, bone, or ivory, with a double (or less probably, a single) reed

in the bulb of the mouthpiece. The player wore a leather halter to

hold in his puffing lips. Often he used a pair of auloi, modifying the

note by drawing them apart or together.1 The aulos might accompany

any choral singing, down to drinking-parties after dinner; but a

soloist accompanied himself on strings, and strings were naturally

used by the composers themselves.

Bigger and better stringed instruments may have come in about

Pindar’s times. The classical kithara had a body of wood, and a sound-

box made of, or shaped like, a tortoise’s shell, with oxhide stretched

over the face and two curved horns rising from it, joined by a cross-

bar carrying the pegs, to which strings of gut were stretched over a

bridge. For plucking, an ivory plectrum was generally used in one hand,

and in the other the fingers alone. From the seventh century onwards,

archaeological evidence shows varying numbers of strings (from four

to eleven or twelve) in concurrent use. This simultaneously attested

variety is enough to suggest that the exact number had less practical

significance than was attached to it in apocryphal anecdotes of the

fourth century B.C. Terpander—a shadowy figure assigned to variant

seventh-century dates and suspiciously coupled with the mythical

Olympus—was inflated into a Founder of kitharistic music, and

was supposed to have increased the strings of the phorminx from

four to the symbolic number of seven, also imputed to Orpheus.2

He was made responsible for poems of uncertain origin and tradi-

tional kitharistic nomes (e.g. the nomos orthios or ‘shrill nome’,

still familiar in the fifth century). According to Pindar, however, his

instrument was not the phorminx but the barbitos, which he invented

in antiphonal answer to the Lydian pectis.3 Exactly how these instru-

ments differed from others was disputed. The barbitos, which was

a lyre with long strings, was certainly used by the two great Aeolian

‘Lyra’ and ‘Tibia’ in Daremberg-Saglio, Dictionnaire d’antiquités (Paris, 1877-1919);

Sachs, History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), and article in Reallexikon

der Musikinstrumente (Berlin, 1913); Schlesinger, The Greek Aulos (London, 1938;

inacceptable on musical theory). Illustrations (undated) in Wegener, Musikleben der

Griechen (Berlin, 1949).

1 Aristox. Harm. 42. The left aulos might also answer the right: Varro R. R. i. 2,

15-16, may also mean that the tibia succcentiva (left) was held lower than the incentiva

(right), but certainly implies that its part was a subsequent response (cf. succino in

Hor. Ep. i. 7, 48).

2 The poem on the subject ascribed to Terpander is spurious.

3 Frag. 125 (ap. Athen. 635d, discussing the instruments).

Page 431

382

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

composers of the early sixth century, Alcaeus and Sappho. Both were

of Lesbos, which was also the reputed home of Terpander. It is not

necessary to decide whether ‘Terpander’—a title meaning Rejoicer

of Man—was a historical personage or merely a πρῶτος εὑρετής: the

equivalent of a patron saint. In either case his quasi-legendary fame

is best interpreted as a symbol of the musical influence of the Aeolian

school which followed in the sixth century.

(iii) Aeolian Music. Of Sappho’s life little but legend is preserved.

Alcaeus, on the other hand, is the first tangible figure in the history

of European music. He was a nobleman of Lesbos with a colourful

record of war, exile, and political opposition to the local Tyrants.

He is said to have sung in exquisite dress, and his own songs were

especially popular in classical Athens at those fashionable drinking-

parties where the aristocracy made music.1 Both Alcaeus and Sappho

were brilliant metrical innovators; both wrote in their native Aeolian

dialect. Their art was personal, and their lyric forms usually monodic.

In literary genre there is little to relate them to the first classical

composers at the end of the sixth century. But these composers

have a special predilection for a style which they call ‘Aeolian’,

although they themselves came from Boeotia or the Peloponnese;

and while no influence can be traced from Alcaeus and Sappho in

particular, it is possible that a general influence was exercised by the

school of Lesbos.

At Athens the pioneer of the classical movement was Lasos of

Hermione, the powerful dithyrambist who caught a creature of the

Pisistratid Tyrants forging oracles. Lasos refers to his own music

‘in the deep-sounding Aeolian harmonia’; and Pratinas, another

Peloponnesian, not much later exhorts musicians to ‘follow neither

the high nor the low Ionian muse, but plough the middle course and

Aeolize in your song’.2 The verb means ‘to speak the Aeolian (musical)

language’. Harmonia in its melodic sense denotes not only a tuning

but a tropos or idiom. That the Aeolian idiom was ‘deep’ to Lasos

but ‘middle’ to Pratinas only shows that its pitch was a relative

matter: at any rate, it was something opposed to the shrill archaic

styles. Evidently they were proud to practise and advertise this music.

Pindar, though he also has a Lydian manner, more often describes

his tropos as Aeolian. For his Lydian he can employ a phorminx as

1 Aristoph. Thesm. 160; Lys. 1236 f., &c.

2 Both cited by ‘Heraclides Ponticus’ (ap. Athen. 624e–625f), who ignorantly equates

the Aeolian harmonia with the Hypodorian octave-species.

Page 432

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

well as wind, and for his Aeolian auloi as well as strings, or he can combine both with dancers in a full-dress epinikian ode: the difference is not in the instruments, but simply in the styles. A problem, however, arises when Pindar seems to call the same music both Aeolian and Dorian. For King Hieron’s Olympian victory on his horse

Pherenicus, Pindar writes: ‘Take from its peg my Dorian phorminx. . . . Him I must crown with a horseman’s strain of Aeolian song.’1

Elsewhere he speaks of ‘an Aeolian walking the Dorian road of hymns,’ and of some new tropos (unnamed) which he is tuning to his ‘Dorian sandal’.2 Later scholiasts, noticing the difficulty but knowing nothing of his music, conjectured that in the former case the rhythm was Aeolian, in the latter Dorian. But these are not metric terms, and the idea that a ‘Dorian’ rhythm could simply be clapped on to an ‘Aeolian’ tropos (or vice versa) seems purely academic. Pindar’s

language suggests rather that he was somehow adapting an Aeolian melopoeia to principles of rhythm and string-tuning which were called Dorian. That the term Dorian in fact referred to tuning as well as rhythm is shown by the following passage of Pratinas:3

What is thisuproar, what these dancings? What outrage has attacked the trampled altar of Dionysus? . . . It is the voice that is queen, by order of the Muse: the aulos must dance behind, being indeed a servant. Only in the rout and fisticuffs of young mummers banging at the door let him act the General and be thankful. Beat that bad breath of a coloratura-mottled toad! Burn that varlet of a low-crooning babbling reed that wastes spittle and spoils time and tune as he steps along, with his body all gimlet-holes! Now look at me, O God of the ivied hair, Dionysus triumphant in dithyrambs: this is the right fling of hand and foot. Hear my own performance—the Dorian!

Here Pratinas, notwithstanding his other manifesto in favour of the Aeolian style, is calling his own music Dorian. Taken together with Pindar’s evidence, it tends to strengthen the suspicion that in this early classical period the terms Dorian and Aeolian might be applied to the same music; and it is notable that in the later fifth century, although Pindar was by no means obsolete, the Aeolian name dropped out of musical use, while the Dorian remained. But we cannot pretend to understand such terms too exactly in a period of rapid musical development, when the main styles were certainly losing any real association with the local schools and dialects from

1 Ol. i. 17 and 101 f.

2 Frag. 19; Ol. iii. 5. Aeolian tropos also in Pyth. ii. 69 ff., Nem. iii. 79.

3 Frag. 1 (ap. Athen. 617e, where the musical point is misunderstood). Text and meaning are often dubious, but the general sense is clear.

Page 433

384

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

which they may originally have been named. What emerges clearly is

that to Pratinas the Dorian stands for true rhythm and tuning led by

the voice, as against the rhythmical and tonal errors of an uncon-

trollable aulos. By the end of the century our sources distinguish,

above all, two major types of tuning and idiom: the one clean and

sustained (entonos), typified by the high classical Dorian, the other

chromatic and quivering (aiolos), often assorted with the style then

known as Phrygian and with the aulos or its tonal effects. Other

distinct brands of music still existed, but they were falling away into

the popular background of the more mature fifth-century movement.

To illustrate this point, it will be necessary to clarify the terms in

which Plato surveys the range of harmoniae known during the later

classical period.

(iv) The Harmoniae of Plato's Republic. We know from Aristo-

phanes that fifth-century schoolboys were taught to tune their lyres

to more than one harmonia or accordatura. But these tunings need

not be interpreted as mechanical scale-forms. The stylistic connota-

tions of the word emerge clearly in the classical Greek preference

for an adverbial form, Doristi, Lydisti, Phrygisti—used of speaking

'in a certain idiom'—rather than an adjectival phrase, 'Dorian,

Lydian, or Phrygian harmonia'. Plato's own usage can best be studied

in a famous passage, here summarized as follows:1

The harmonia and the rhythm must follow the sense of the words; and in

words (as we were saying) we have no use for dirges and lamentations.

Which, then, are the harmoniae of dirges? That in the Mixolydian, the

High Lydian, and suchlike harmoniae. Then these must surely be abolished,

for they are unprofitable even for decent women, let alone men. Now, in

the men who defend the City drunkenness, softness, and laxity are most

unbecoming. Which are the soft wine-bibber's harmoniae? That in the

Ionian; and some in the Lydian are also called low and lax. These can be

of no good to fighting men. So you seem to be left with two harmoniae, in

the Dorian and in the Phrygian.

The term harmonia here has two connotations. (a) Since there can

be more than one harmonia in the low Lydian, Plato at this point

equates harmonia with a single melodia, or at least a sub-type; and

this usage is confirmed by Euripides, who speaks of the nightingale

'weaving her fine-spun harmonia in the trees'.3 (b) Otherwise Plato

1 Rep. 398d-399a (abbreviated). The word chalaros is punningly used for both 'low-

pitched' and 'morally lax'. The reading αὖ τίνες is here accepted.

3 Frag. 773.

Page 434

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

385

gives to harmonia the more general sense of a whole melodic idiom (e.g. what Aristoxenus calls ‘the Phrygian melos’).

Some, though not all, of the harmoniae named are associated with (relatively) high or low pitches. But their more fundamental associations are with special forms or occasions of music—for instance, the hysterical shrieking of dirges or the sensual crooning of wine-songs.

Plato elsewhere tells us that at the end of the classical era these and other associations broke down, and the various forms and idioms were confused.1 Later Greeks, no longer knowing the old forms of musical expression, imagined that Plato was attaching abstract ethical effects to the various harmoniae: a superstition which Aristoxenus briefly repudiates.2

It is true that to classical Greek minds music was like a second language, capable of expressing almost all that could be said in words, and of bringing out the moods or passions latent in them.

Such bilingualism of speech and music is perhaps unparalleled in Europe: certainly it is the antithesis of the idea of music as a closed world existing for its own sake in its own terms.

Like all Greek art, music was mimetic or representative—a direct photography (as it were) of mental objects formed by the ethos and pathos of the soul.

This psychological theory was carried to absurdity by later Greeks who (as an ancient writer says) fell into ecstasies and compared tunes with natural objects.3

But Plato’s own meaning is quite straightforward and sensible.

Music in the classical tradition expressed the words and was indivisible from their substance, which was not always edifying.

Aristophanes has given us a decisive example of the Ionian style which Plato regards as unfit for boys’ education.

It is, in fact, an outrageously indecent duet between two prostitutes.4

The polite Hellenistic society of a later age had forgotten that music could be barbarous and orgiastic.

The famous oriental dirge for Adonis was civilized into a conventional piece of Alexandrian recitative, which Theocritus could cast into charming verse; but this was not the real Adoniasm, with its dinning drums, known to fifth-century Athens.

The excruciating ‘Ai-ai Adonin!’, screamed from the housetops by a frenzied female, falling on the ear like an evil omen, had been almost enough to break off the Assembly’s debate on the invasion of Sicily.5

The ‘high and low harmoniae’ (like the archaic ‘shrill nome’)

1 Laws 700a ff. (cited below, p. 395).

2 Papyr. Hibeh i. 13.

3 Harm. 31.

4 Eccl. 893 ff. (in 918–19, ‘Ionic tropos’ is used punningly, alluding to the musical sense in l. 883).

5 Theocr. Buc. xv; Aristoph. Lys. 393 ff.

B 8808

C C

Page 435

386

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

may represent a lingering ancient stratum of popular music. We cannot define them precisely. The Mixolydian aroused endless curiosity in late antiquity owing to the problems of placing a seventh theoretical tonos of that name, and speculations on its archaic nature were then quite unhistorical. The archaic Lydian and Ionian date from the period when Ionia was in the Lydian empire, and the two terms may have meant much the same. The ‘high Lydian’ and ‘low Lydian and Ionian’, which Plato banishes from education, can scarcely have differed very much from the ‘high and low Ionian’ which Pratinas banished from music. Both were of the primitive or popular stuff against which the first classical composers were asserting the modern refinement of their Aeolian or Dorian manner.1 In the later fifth century respectable composers ceased to write in the old popular genres, which early poets had refined and adorned. These genres fell back into a musical underworld, which could still inspire the genius of Euripides, but was generally regarded as vulgar.2 The Dorian and Phrygian were the main styles now practised in serious music. They represented two indispensable but sharply contrasted modes of expression. The Lydian name is still occasionally used, but is virtually identified with the Phrygian. Telestes, at the end of the century, speaks of ‘that Phrygian king of the holy aulos . . . who first tuned the quivering (aiolos) Lydian strain, rival of the Dorian muse’.3

Telestes’ adjective aiolos exactly reflects that quivering, flexible melodic line which Aristophanes parodies in the new dithyrambists. The dithyrambic tropos of the day was the Phrygian, which was closely associated with the aulos, though the new composers imitated its effects on strings as well. The aulos (as Pratinas complained) drowned both rhythm and tuning with its incontinent wobbles unless it was subordinated to the voice, and a music dominated by its noise can have had little regard for rational laws of consonance. Its attraction was emotional excitement. Phrygian music was not always exaggerated or intemperate: Plato admits it as a necessity for the softer moods of persuasion or appeal. But its antithesis to the Dorian tuning went far deeper than any alleged difference of ‘modal’ species. Greek writers, in contrasting the Dorian music’s measured firmness with the pliant ecstasy of the Phrygian, are not merely word-painting. When Philoxenus tried to compose a dithyramb in the Dorian he found it a stylistic impossibility.4 The Dorian was en tonos, a music

1 Pindar’s Lydian (whether related to archaic Lydian music or not) belongs to a different musical level. Plato implies that there were several ‘Lydian’ harmoniae.

2 Aristoph. Frogs 1301–4.

3 Diehl, op. cit. ii, p. 126; cf. ibid., p. 156.

4 Aristotle, Pol. 1342b.

Page 436

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

387

of notes firmly tuned and sustained without quavering or kampai,

incapable of the enthusiasmos demanded by the Dionysiac dithyramb.

1

Plato and Aristoxenus are at one in their preference for the high

classical school of the earlier fifth century. But they refer to their ideal

in different terms. For Plato, it is represented by the Dorian harmonia;

for Aristoxenus, by the enharmonic genus. There is some reason to

believe that the Dorian harmonia and the enharmonic genus were

intimately related.

(v) The ‘enharmonic’ music. It is not till the fourth century that

we hear of the classification of the tetrachord into three genera.

Ex. 306 is here set out on a less rigid staff, with continuous lines for

the fixed mese and hypate, a dotted line for the movable lichanos,

and movable parypate in the space:

Ex. 318

(a) Enharmonic

(b) Chromatic

(c) Diatonic

These are still only schematic figures or skeletons of melodic styles.

According to Aristoxenus the diatonic (which dominates post-

Alexandrian music) was the oldest. The chromatic was a novelty in

411 B.C., when Aristophanes parodied its fashionable exponent

Agathon, with the comment: ‘Ant-crawls—or what’s this warbling?’

2

Chroma means the minor shades of the movable notes, and the chro-

matic developed as a moist relentment of the sharp enharmonic out-

lines. It connoted a very different style, attuned to the poetic prettiness

of the fourth century.

Analytically, the genera were defined by the tuning of lichanos.

Aristoxenus contrasts the classical enharmonic with the fourth-

century cult of chromaticism in an illuminating passage:

3

That there is a melodic style which demands a ditonal lichanos [i.e. two

whole tones below mese]—and no mean style, but about the finest of all—

is far from evident to most musicians nowadays, although it could be

shown to them by induction from examples. But what I say will be clear

enough to those familiar with the first and second of the old tropoi.

Those used only to the present style of composition will of course reject the

ditonal lichanos, since the great majority nowadays use a higher tuning.

1

See further below, pp. 389, 393 ff.

2

Thesm. 100.

3

Harm. 23.

Page 437

388

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

The reason is a hankering for more and more sweetness: that this is their

aim is shown by the fact that they practise chiefly and almost always the

chromatic—or if they ever do touch the enharmonic, they approximate its

tuning to the chromatic, wherewith its stylistic character (ethos) is distorted

to ruin.

The numbering of ‘first and second topoi’ can only be pedagogic.

It refers, not to the archaic beginnings of music, but to the melopoiec

styles taught in the classical curriculum of schools, beginning from

Simonides and Pindar, or the first period of what was recognized by

the classicists as ‘the finest style of all’.1

In this ‘finest style’, Aristoxenus treats the ditonal progression

from mese to lichanos not as a mere option of the ear, but as a

demonstrable necessity of musical syntax. The term induction is taken

from the logic of his master Aristotle.2 The exact effects are of course

irrecoverable, but we can imagine how a music built upon the con-

trast between fixed and movable notes, consonant and dissonant

progressions, might be deranged by the introduction of a new quasi-

consonance such as a sweet and perfect 5:4 third from mese down to

a higher tuning of lichanos. According to the pseudo-Plutarchian De

musica, the enharmonic pyknon was originally undivided, and old-

fashioned auletes could still be heard to keep the semitone whole ‘in

the tetrachord meson as well’.3 The implication is that the dieses were

used chiefly or solely in the tetrachord meson, and that, even there,

they were regarded as a later decorative addition. These so-called

‘quarter-tones’ often strike modern minds as the salient feature of the

enharmonic genus. In fact, they were incidental to it. The enharmonic

style was basically defined by the progressions resulting from the

ditonal lichanos of the classical period.

The pseudo-Plutarch somewhat unconvincingly derives enharmonic

music from the archaic spondeion of Olympus, but adds that the

irregular three-quarter-tone interval of the spondeion is alien to the

real enharmonic (and to all the genera). This account at least serves

to emphasize the purity of the enharmonic tuning by contrast with

archaic aulos-music. Now it is a striking fact that the term ‘enhar-

monic’ is not found till the fourth century, when the three genera

were first classified. The traditional name of the genus—still used by

Plato, and often by Aristoxenus—was simply ‘The Harmonia’: i.e.

‘the tuning’, or music in tune. The opposite term, exharmonic, means

1 When the ‘second tropos’ began is uncertain, but not here relevant.

2 ἐπάγεται.

3 De mus. 11, 6. The source of this datum can hardly be later than the fourth

century, when the enharmonic music was dying out.

Page 438

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

389

'out of tune'. The false notes produced by violent modulation in the

new anti-classical styles are called exharmonic: i.e. transgressions of

'The (enharmonic) Tuning'.1 Before Aristoxenus, no theorist had

ever analysed any genus except the enharmonic;2 and Aristoxenus

himself uses it as the typical figure for general demonstration. It is

clear that, until the fourth century, 'The Harmonia' was in some sense

unique-the only note-series which was considered to be truly 'in

tune' and worth logical analysis. Historically, it may be supposed to

represent the principles of rational consonance worked out in music

by the first classical composers, and in mathematics by their contem-

poraries, the first harmonic scientists. This is not to say that the

archaic idioms necessarily lacked all acoustic logic; but the classical

music represented some more conscious achievement of a well-tuned

tonality, which first superseded the archaic styles, then broke down

under the chromaticism of the modernists.

The double enharmonic tetrachord (with the ditonal lichanos) is to

Aristoxenus the pure theoretical figure of the great classical styles

which he remembered. In fourth-century terms, it corresponds to the

octave-species called Dorian (in the enharmonic genus). Without the

melopoeic progressions, the scale conveys little to us; but it may

reasonably be regarded as an abstract schema of the old classic Dorian

tuning. In other words, 'The Harmonia' may probably be identified

as both 'enharmonic' and 'Dorian'. The idea that a composer took

a mode called Dorian and then chose between its three alternative

genera is an unhistorical impression from later analytical textbooks.

In classical melopoeia, harmonia and genus were not so dissociable.

The other fourth-century scale-forms were only artificial segments,

with artificial names, cut out of this rationalized note-series for

theoretical purposes. The old Phrygian harmonia or melos, which

called for the tonal uncertainties of the aulos or emulated them on

the kithara, may have been stylized to some degree, but it cannot be

explained as a sub-type of the same note-series.

Thus far a tentative discussion of this fifth-century terminology

may be justifiable; but it is hampered by our ignorance of contempor-

ary teaching. Of the mysteriously influential Damon, the musical

friend of Pericles and Socrates, we know little for certain, though

much was conjectured by later Platonists.3 He is said to have stan-

dardized the nomenclature of some harmoniae. In any case, the

1 'Pherecrates' ap. ps.-Plutarch, De mus. 30, 3.

2 Harm. 2.

3 All references to extant writings by Damon are suspicious or late. Few will accept

as authentic his alleged speech before the Areopagites.

Page 439

390

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

poet-composers who were absorbing local dialects into a literary language must also have universalized the chief musical idioms. A common and conscious Hellenism was the tendency, if not the achievement, of the age. The Greek belief that Dorian music was more ‘Hellenic’ than Phrygian was true only in the sense that the Dorian was a typical creation of the classical spirit.1 For oriental influences in music of this date there can be no concrete evidence. The names and natures of harmoniae have evoked both ancient and modern speculation, but it is doubtful whether they could ever define more than the broader differences of musical character. Between the Lydian of Pindar and the Lydian or Phrygian of Telestes much had changed. The classical music did not develop through musically autonomous forms; it was more aptly classified (as Plato also knew) by the literary forms which it served.2 These forms, too, were in rapid growth and change. Within them, contemporaries were sharply aware of differences in the dates and styles of individual composers.

(vi) Aristophanes and Athens. Pindar, though he may have boasted of noble lineage, speaks and behaves as a professional musician.3 His patrons were the aristocracies of Greece and the kings or lords of Sicily, where Stesichorus had brought choral performances into fashion. The distinctive contribution of Athens to music was the tragic and comic theatre, still financed by wealthy persons but effectively patronized by the whole City: a drama in which the simple movements and plain accompaniment of a citizen chorus required no professional training in choreography and instrumentation, as did the dithyramb or the Pindaric ode. Whereas gentlemen like Alcaeus had touched only the smaller forms of lyric song, free-born Athenians could now compose big works. A set of three tragedies with a comedy had to be presented for a prize at the Great Dionysia or other yearly festivals. The tragedians, being financially independent and bound to a dramatic theme, tell us far less of their own music than the professional Pindar, who is continually aware of his art, his lyre, and his orchestration, his patrons and rivals, and his purse. But it was a prime function of the classic comedy to criticize music as well as politics and persons. The greatest of comedians was himself probably the greatest of Athenian composers,4 and certainly the greatest of

1 Cf. Plat. Lach. 188 d. ‘Heraclides Ponticus’ on racial origins of music is anachronistic fantasy.

2 Laws 700a.

3 Pyth. v. 72 ff; but professional status is proved by his references to fees.

4 So Plato's epigram: the Graces (goddesses especially of music) chose Aristophanes' soul as their home.

Page 440

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

391

Greek musical critics. Aristophanes and his audience—or its upper layer—could catch musical allusions back to Archilochus or Alcman, and could enjoy parodies ranging from the first classics to the latest dithyrambic novelty. His plays are the epitome of the Athenian musical education of his time.

Boys of the upper classes went to a music-master, and in company they were expected to intone their piece of epic or to sing the classics at meals.1 ‘Musical hoggishness’ was a social and political insult.2 For advanced students there were professors of composition, caricatured in Aristophanes’ hack Poet with his stock in trade of model styles—Homer, Simonides, Pindar, the maiden-song, the dithyramb.3 Choruses were also trained by professionals, unless the composer (like Aristophanes) could do it for himself. But music was much more than an academic discipline and a fine art. At every drinking-party an aulos was there to accompany scolia and favourite numbers from musical comedy. The first man to drain his vase of wine during the breath of a trumpet-blast got a prize; the drinker who sang the night through ‘took the cake’ as a reward.4 At a smart party, as staged by Aristophanes, the guests first pour the libation of wine on the floor (the social rite at which libation-songs were sung); then the aulos-girl tunes up, and the scolia go on until the eldest guest makes off with the aulos-girl.5 Auletes were also employed by gymnasts for rhythmical exercises, and by magistrates for public proclamations in the City.

The forms of rural music were afterwards collected by Alexandrian scholars, more from literary references than from life. They catalogued over fifty generic or regional types of dance, with innumerable songs of shepherd loves or of rustic labours—the ‘practical songs’ sung at work by spinners, millers, reapers, and water-drawers.6 Fifth-century composers had drawn upon the melodic fund of popular music for their own work. Aristophanes often uses the popular metric forms, polishing them into sophisticated art and mixing them on occasion with the grand styles.7 It had been done before, as he tells us, by Phrynichus and other early classical composers. ‘I reveal’ (sing his Birds) ‘the nomes sacred to Pan, the dances to the Great Mother of the mountains, from which Phrynichus ever drew his sweet melody,

1 Aristoph. Peace 1267 ff.; Clouds 1355 ff.

2 Knights 985 ff.

3 Birds 904-58.

4 Ach. 1000; Knights 277.

5 Wasps 1212 ff.

6 Athen. 618e–620a, with some examples. (But the ‘Nile Chantey’ of Powell, Collectanea Alexandrina (Oxford, 1925), p. 185, no. 7, is scarcely an Egyptian bargee song.)

7 e.g. Aristoph. Clouds 563–74.

Page 441

392

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

sucking like a bee that ambrosial fruit of song.'1 The 'old honey-sweet songs from Phrynichus' Phoenissae' were inspired by hymns from country liturgies. Modernists dismissed the choruses of his contemporary Lamprocles as 'prehistoric maypole-stuff full of grass-hoppers'-to which the classicists retorted that this was the music that bred the men who fought at Marathon.2 In the Frogs, Euripides is made to accuse Aeschylus of stealing from this antiquated folk-song: 'Did you get those water-drawer's ditties from Marathon, or where?' -'From Beauty I drew them to Beauty', replies Aeschylus impressively, adding, 'that I might not be seen to have reaped the self-same holy meadow of music as Phrynichus.'3 The point is that Aeschylus did, in fact, draw upon the same rustic hymnal. Its influence appears in the rhythmical refrains used at the end of strophic movements in some of his choruses.4 Echoes of a more primitive music are audible too. In a chorus of Persian elders bewailing the destruction of Xerxes' army, his mind goes back to the dirge-cry for Bormus sung by serfs as they reaped the cornfields by the Black Sea; at the end of two choric strophae of the Agamemnon he recalls the Ailinon of the Linus-song sung by peasants since Homeric times.5 Aristophanes himself, at the end of a play, will often use the old wedding-cry Hymenaeus, or the tenella kallinike of Archilochus, or some country dance. Popular melody was still an ingredient in the subtle and modern music of Euripides, though he drew it (so Aristophanes alleges) not from pure and solemn rural chants, but from the dregs of vulgar song -dirges, drinking-catches, dances fit for castanets: in fact, the har-moniae of low life which Plato rejected.6

The Frogs is Aristophanes' last tribute to the composer whom he had parodied so often that he could not leave the subject when, in 406 B.C., Euripides died. In the play of 405 the god Dionysus, sick of the bad poets left swarming on earth, goes to Hades to hear Euripides once more. The souls of dead frogs in the Stygian marshes are initiates of the Orphic mysteries (which claimed communication with the after-life). Against the contrasting chorus of their simple chants, sung to the Elysian aulos, Aristophanes stages the competition between the two

1 Birds 745 ff. (misunderstood by Wilamowitz, Griechische Verskunst (Berlin, 1921), p. 436, n. 2).

2 Wasps 220; Clouds 984 ff. (The aboriginal country-folk of Attica were believed to have worn gold grasshoppers in their hair.)

3 Frogs 1298 ff. (cf. 910).

4 Aesch. Agam. 381-5 (cf. E. Fraenkel's commentary, vol. ii, p. 186).

5 Aesch. Pers. 935-40; Agam. 121 (with Fraenkel, vol. ii, p. 74 on refrains, &c., at end of movements).

6 Frogs 1301-4.

Page 442

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

393

great tragic composers. Aeschylus wins by superior weight. The clattering pomp of his oracular lines, between the monotonous thrum- ming of the kithara–tophlattothrat tophlattothrat—is calculated to make the modern lyrical sophistries of Euripides sound insubstantial and wispy.1 In his later plays Euripides had withdrawn the chorus somewhat from the action, using it often for interludes of evocative poetry in which musical sound (so critics thought) counted more than dramatic sense. His chief innovation, however, was the lyric monody sung by an actor on the stage. Instead of observing the strophic correspon- dence of classical tradition, these monodies were durchkom- poniert. Aristophanes himself had adopted this form to his own style in his brilliantly new Hoopoe Song, where he strings together a series of brief passages (anabolae) in variant and contrasting metres.2 But it was originally and especially associated with the musical manner of the school of Phrynis and Cinesias, who were working out modern ideas in the dithyramb and the kitharoedic nome.

In the last quarter of the fifth century3 the dithyrambist Melanip- pides and his successors began to exploit or emphasize the quivering intonation suggested by the aulos, and to copy it in their kitharoedic nomes. Although Aristophanes’ musical parodies are lost, his verbal metaphors are vivid and illuminating. He defines the style by contrast with the early classics. The new music was no longer virile, taut, entonos—well tuned and unwavering: it was marked by flamboyant kampai (‘bends’) and by a formless flexibility of melodic line.4 It is not clear whether kampai were in fact modulations or decorative shakes, but Aristophanes certainly insists upon the tonal instability of this music. The modernist tragedian Agathon appears on the Aristophanic stage spreading out his strophae to melt in the sun: if cold, they will not bend. When he sings, his song is like the zigzagging of ants.5 The new dithyrambists, ecstatic and effeminate creatures, are so easily bent that they have to wear stays. Their bodies are willowy; their souls after death go fluttering among the clouds in search of brand-new anabolae; their music is made of snowflakes and feathers eddying in the sky; they long to be birds.6 Aristophanes is obviously alluding to the same new, sky-borne, fluttering manner

1 Frogs 1264–1363.

2 Birds 227 ff.; cf. Fraenkel in Eranos, xlviii (1950). The form occurs in Euripides’ Orestes.

3 For this Melanippides the date usually accepted (c. 480–450 B.C.) makes nonsense of musical history, and is unproved: we know only that he died before 413 B.C.

4 Aristoph. Clouds 967 ff.

5 Thesm. 66–192.

6 Peace 830 ff.; Clouds 332 ff.; Birds 1372–1409.

Page 443

394

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

when, in the Frogs, he burlesques Euripides' coloratura on the first syllable of the word for 'twirling': εἰ-εἰ-εἰ-εἰλίσσουσᾳ.1

In the light of subsequent evidence we can see that what Aristophanes was describing was the breakdown of the classical tonality, which came about chiefly through modulation and chromatic tuning.

A little later, a comedian stages a personal protest by the Muse against the tortures she has suffered from Melanippides, Phrynis, Cinesias, and their successors Philoxenus and Timotheus, who twist her on the rack with their 'exharmonic' notes as they modulate, knocking a dozen different harmoniae out of five strings, regardless of the false melodic relations produced.2

We are further told that Agathon was the first tragedian to use the chromatic genus, which Aristoxenus noted as a prime factor in the breakdown of the classical melopoeia.

Metabolae and chromata are expressly cited as features of the style of Philoxenus, the next leader of the new movement.

In its experimental stages, when Aristophanes wrote, these technical terms cannot yet have been invented to describe its innovations.

But it must not be supposed that, because we now possess only Aristophanes' word-pictures, his musical criticism was any the less precise or mature.

The reason why classical Greeks invented few technical terms was that they did not depend on the imperfect medium of words alone; they criticized music by caricaturing it in music, so long as a musically educated public existed.

The Frogs was not only a foreboding of musical disruption.

It was an appeal for the whole tradition of Athenian citizens 'bred in athletics, the chorus, and the arts of music', against uncultured or alien ideas.3

The chorus had already been cut down under the financial stress of the war.

At the end of the play the demagogue Cleophon is requested to hang himself, and the spirit of Aeschylus is sent up to counsel Athens, 'that the City may be saved and have her chorus still'.

From Aristophanes' later plays we know what happened.

Such music as he could still provide, with a much reduced chorus, had to conform to a level of popular taste which can be judged by the vulgarity of the genres and the crudity of the metres.4

The dithyramb survived the war because its wide popular appeal induced the rich—and eventually the City—to go on paying its high costs of production.

The comedy could not maintain its choric tradition, and the best

1 Frogs 1348 (cf. 1314).

2 'Pherecrates' ap. ps.-Plutarch, De mus. 30, 3; cf. Düring in Eranos, xliii (1945). The number of strings has been emended through editorial misunderstanding.

3 Aristoph. Frogs 729; ibid. 1419 (cf. 1504).

4 Ecclesiazusae and Plutus.

Page 444

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

395

school of public musical education in Athens virtually closed down

with the Spartan auloi chortling over the destruction of the city walls.

(vii) Plato and the revolution. Plato's brief history of the musical

revolution in Athens, written in the mid-fourth century B.C., is worth

summarizing at some length:1

Our music was once divided into its proper forms. Prayers were one

form of ode, surnamed 'hymns'; opposed to this was another form,

'dirges'; another called 'paeans', and another 'dithyrambs'. . . . 'Nomes'

were a distinct kind, surnamed 'kitharoedic'. It was not permitted to

exchange the melodic styles of these established forms and others. Know-

ledge and informed judgment penalized disobedience. There were no

whistles, unmusical mob-noises, or clapping for applause. The rule was

to listen silently and learn; boys, teachers, and the crowd were kept in

order by threat of the stick. . . . But later, an unmusical anarchy was led

by poets who had natural talent, but were ignorant of the laws of music.

Over-intoxicated with love of pleasure, they mixed their drinks–dirges

with hymns, paeans with dithyrambs—and imitated aulos-music in their

kitharoedic song. Through foolishness they deceived themselves into think-

ing that there was no right or wrong way in music—that it was to be judged

good or bad by the pleasure it gave. By their works and their theories they

infected the masses with the presumption to think themselves adequate

judges. So our theatres, once silent, grew vocal, and aristocracy of music

gave way to a pernicious theatocracy—for had it been a free democracy,

it would have been nothing to fear. As it was, the criterion was not music,

but a reputation for promiscuous cleverness and a spirit of law-breaking.

If classical drama without applause sounds austere, it must be

remembered that the theatre was the only school of the poorer citizens.

Seats were free, and under the Periclean system of State education

the poor were paid two obols' maintenance whenever they attended.

That they had to be kept quiet with sticks is only one instance of the

well-known fact that Periclean ideals of enlightenment failed to

penetrate the lower strata of society. Plato's charge against the new

dithyrambists is not lack of musical genius: it is that they used high

musical talents, showmanship, and virtuosity in the pursuit of sen-

sationalism, consciously rejecting educated standards of judgment,

and proclaiming that their end was immediate pleasure. The proof

of this charge is that the new middle classes of the fourth century,

while they no longer knew the past classics, turned away from the

music of their own time as from a vulgarizing influence, enjoyable

indeed, but no matter for serious practice or thought. Hence the

1 Laws 700a–701a (abbreviated).

Page 445

396

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

reduction of musical schooling to an elementary level and the dis-

appearance of critical judgments on compositions.1 The perpetual

disparagement of new music in later philosophers has given the im-

pression of a mere general prejudice against modernism, but these

writers are not expressing opinions on any actual music: they are

mechanically repeating Plato.2

From another passage we know that Plato was thinking particu-

larly of the school of Cinesias the dithyrambist, which had since pro-

duced the ultra-modernists Philoxenus and Timotheus. Aristophanes

in his last play had parodied the solo of the Cyclops, sung to the

'threttanelo!' of the strumming kithara, which Philoxenus flung into

one of his dithyrambs—a concrete case of the mixing of musical

genres, for a dithyramb had never contained a kitharoedic piece.3 .

Philoxenus, it was told, was sent to the quarries for laughing at the

old-fashioned compositions of Dionysius the tyrant of Syracuse, who

treasured Euripides' pen. Phrynis, as well as Euripides, was now

thought out of date. Timotheus of Miletus repudiated the entire past

tradition in a famous manifesto:4

I do not sing the old things,

Because the new are the winners.

Zeus the young is king today:

Once it was Cronos ruling.

Get out, old dame Music.

A deliberate blatancy and toughness distinguishes the post-war

rebels from their precursors, who had affected to be aesthetes. The

bombastic libretto of Timotheus' Persae was written for programme-

music of the sort which attempted (Plato says) to make the noises

of thunder, wind, hail, cats, dogs, cattle, bird-song, and all kinds of

instruments, with frequent and startling modulations.5 The dithy-

rambist and the kitharoede were professional musicians, normally

aliens; and music of this kind depended on the virtuosity of per-

formers, especially of instrumentalists. The problem of modulation

produced many instrumental experiments. Plato mentions a 'pan-

harmonium', strung for all tunings at once. A certain Pythagoras of

Zacynthus is said to have invented a pyramid of three kitharae, tuned

to the Dorian, Phrygian, and Lydian harmoniae, on a revolving stool

which he kicked round with his foot as he played—but, as the source

1 See above, pp. 339–40.

2 On such repetition of Plato down to medieval times, see Egon Wellesz, A History

of Byzantine Music (Oxford, 1949), pp 38–55.

3 Plat. Gorg. 501e; Aristoph. Plut. 290 ff.

4 Diehl, op. cit. ii, p. 150, no. 7.

5 Plat. Rep. 397a–b.

Page 446

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

397

confesses, this contraption may be apocryphal.1 Certainly apocryphal

are the stories that Timotheus himself added new strings to his

kithara, was ordered by the conservative Spartans to cut them out,

and appealed to the archaeological evidence of a many-stringed lyre

in a statuette of Apollo. A contemporary fragment of comedy sug-

gests that Timotheus and his school got their modulations upon a

small number of strings, and that new devices were introduced for

stopping.2 Though eleven-stringed instruments probably came into

use in this period, the additions were exaggerated by theorists

ignorant of real kitharistic technique, familiar only with the kitharoid

apparatus of harmonic science, which had a string to each note.

In practice we know only that rapid changes from one idiom to

another dissolved the characteristic tunings and progressions of each.

The 'exharmonic' effects were soon enjoyed for their own sake.

'How well,' said an admirer of Philoxenus, 'his melodies are con-

cocted with modulations and chromata.' How inferior, he adds, is

the insipid prettiness of more recent music—all ivy and flowers

and water, a string of unrelated tunes.3

(viii) Music after the revolution. The iconoclasts soon became the

idols: Timotheus and Philoxenus eclipsed both their predecessors and

their posterity. Aristoxenus is quoted for the story of a contemporary

musician, Telesias of Thebes, who, after being educated on the classics,

grew enamoured of modern music and learned the works of Philo-

xenus by heart, but could never, in his own composition, break him-

self of the classical idiom.4 It shows how decisive was the break between

the old and the new. While the immediate precursors of Philoxenus

and Timotheus seem to have been scarcely better remembered than

the classics, their successors lacked their vitality, and could not rival

their appeal to the wider public of an enlarged Hellenistic world.

They had created a large pool of enthusiastic listeners who liked

nothing better than to hear the old favourites again; and prizes were

won by musicians repeating the works of Timotheus, instead of pro-

ducing their own according to the classical rule. By Aristoxenus'

day the new style had become conventional: contemporary music,

to him, is not shocking but sugary. This was partly, no doubt,

because the new tonality no longer surprised the ear; but another

reason may be that the Alexandrian age did not (so far as we know)

1 Artemon ap. Athen. 637e-f.

2 Düring in Eranos, xliii (1945) (but the 'Pherecrates' fragment is far from clear).

3 Antiphanes, in Athen. 643d.

4 ps.-Plut. De mus. 31.

Page 447

398

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

pursue the more bizarre instrumental experiments of the revolutionary period—the noises which (as Aristotle says) could excite

babies or beasts. Among the instruments which Plato associates with

these effects is the pectis: yet a century later, when Philoxenus and

Timotheus were still widely performed, the pectis seems to be obsolete, for Alexandrian scholars begin disputing what it was.1 Their

original orchestration cannot have been reproduced: as in the classical

period, only the vocal part in music was permanent. Although Alexandria, for its part, invented the hydraulic organ, we hear little of its

use before the days of the Roman arena.2 In Hellenistic times, more

fashionable types of performance were the massed choirs, sometimes

doubling at the octave, which filled the big new theatres; solo kitharisms without words; duets of auloi playing now in unison, now anti-phonally (but only the philistinism of a Roman general could order a

band of auletes to play all at once). Nor did the duets lead to any ventures in polyphony. The question whether harmony and counterpoint

were practised by the Greeks, which intrigued eighteenth-century

scholars, can be briefly disposed of. A heterophonic accompaniment

was common, as we know from Plato;3 but the instrumental parts could

not have been left to improvisation if they had been solid elements in

a truly polyphonic structure. Choral unison and monody, in their

post-classical forms, remained the staple genres of music; the astrophic

dithyramb, now using wind or strings indifferently, persisted down

to the second century B.C. and straggled on afterwards; the kitharoedic

nome flourished into late antiquity.

A century and a half after Timotheus was dead, when Philopoemen

came into the theatre victorious from Mantinea, the kitharist could

still bring the house down with the opening line of the Persae:4

He who fashioned for Hellas the glorious adornment of Freedom.

Two generations later, when Greek freedom was gone, it was known

as a curiosity of folklore that Philoxenus and Timotheus were till

lately performed as a part of boys’ education in Arcadia.5 The leaders

of revolution had ended as school classics of a rustic and inaccessible

countryside. Our knowledge of music now becomes so dim that we

do not even know when or how the chromatic manner was superseded by the common diatonic; but it is probable that by the time of

the Delphic Hymns the chromatic was used only by force of tradition

1 Plat. Rep. 399 c-d; Athen. 635–636.

2 On the hydraulis (-us) see pp. 270 and 408.

3 Laws 812d (cited above, p. 338).

4 Plut. Philopoemen 11.

5 Polyb. iv. 20–21.

Page 448

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

399

for rare and ceremonial occasions. All our later pieces are based on a

diatonic note-series. About 193 B.C., in a vote of thanks from Cnossos

in Crete, a visiting musician had been praised for performing not

only Timotheus and his disciple Polyidus, but also old Cretan songs,

'as befits an educated man'.1 His programme was primarily a complim-

ent to the Cretans, whose folk-songs were famous, but it may also

indicate a growing taste for something simpler and more popular than

the grand metropolitan style which Timotheus now represented.

The typical popular genre of Hellenistic times (though it dated back

much earlier) was the pantomime. Mummers called by various

generic or local names—hilarodists, magodists, deikelists, autokabdali

—gave mixed shows of ballet and acrobatics, indecent jokes, comic

scenes about drunkards or foreign doctors, escapes, romances, success

stories, parodies of themes from mythology. On a more pretentious

level, the story of Andromache or Antiope might be performed as a

sort of sung ballet. Cicero remarks with surprise that there were

people who could recognize a piece of this sort from the opening

instrumental notes.2 We must infer that such music could attain at

least the relative permanence of a popular vogue. But the example of

the pantomime tended to break up set forms of drama. A chorus

of Euripides might be rendered as a separate concert-piece or kithar-

ism, though not with the original music. One actor would sometimes

give his own selected part from a tragedy, or sometimes sing a per-

sonal interpretation of a tragic role or theme. Nero, who took lessons

from the Greek kitharode Terpnus, improvised an interminable piece

about Niobe, and also executed tragic parts—Canace bearing her

incestuous child, Orestes killing his mother, Oedipus blind, Hercules

mad. He seems to have sung these parts as solos, in his 'thin husky

voice', with other figures on the stage merely to supply the action.3

Roman drama was by then extinct, and such performances were more

like recitals with music and costumes. Another of Nero's enterprises

was a choir called Augustiani to lead his own audience's chants of

applause. The rhythmical chanting of praises to the Emperor on pub-

lic occasions was a direct precedent for the acclamations of the Byzan-

tine Church.4 Together with Quintilian's outburst against orators

who liked to sing their speeches, it shows how closely, in this

period, formal or ceremonial speech approximated to a musical

recitative.

1 Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum, 3053.

2 Ac. ii. 20.

3 Suet. Nero 21; see also p. 418.

4 Cf. M. P. Charlesworth in Journal of Roman Studies xxxiii (1943), pp. 4-6.

Page 449

400

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

From the fourth century B.C. onwards the musician thought of

himself as actor rather than creator or 'discoverer' (as Greeks pre-

ferred to put it). His patrons no longer wanted new music for them-

selves and their children to sing, but exhibitions to applaud from the

hands of a maestro, lavishly staged and subsidized. Technical stan-

dards were high: it was the age of the virtuoso. A star kitharist might

get for one concert a fee that would maintain a Greek trireme for a

year, or more than the cost of a first-class dithyrambic chorus.1

Extravagant verses were written on the tomb of the aulΣete Telephanes,

whom Demosthenes employed for a chorus in 347 B.C.; and the in-

scriptions that commemorate a winning performance soon begin to

name the aulΣete before the poet. The division of labour between

words and music may have begun already in the fourth century, when

new settings had to be provided for Euripides and other revived classi-

cal drama, but poet and musician are still one in the Delphic Hymns,

and there was perhaps no sudden or universal change.2 Certainly,

however, sophisticated poets were growing incapable of making

music, and musicians of writing sophisticated verse. When the classi-

cal unity of Music was broken, the 'music' (in our narrow sense of

the term) was supplied by a professional engaged in the performance.

The modern figure of the pure composer, who is neither poet nor

player, was unknown to antiquity.

It would not be true to say that post-classical music was altogether

monopolized by the professional. Singing was still taught to children

in most Greek schools, and encouraged in some cities by prizes both

for song and for the lyre. Boys' choirs represented their cities in

festival competitions. In one city thirty noble boys were trained to

sing a hymn to Hecate once a month in the town hall. A city had to

keep a choir for festivals and religious occasions, and those who

found professional singers too expensive sometimes economized by

training the ephebes, lads of eighteen to twenty conscribed for mili-

tary and public service. But even these elementary duties were largely

taken over by unions of hired musicians. One of the Delphic Hymns

advertises the performers as technitae of the famous musicians' union

of Athens, which served half of mainland Greece and included

composers with other professional players. These bodies soon became

1 Athen. 623d; Demosth. In Meid. 155; Lysias xxi. 1-2.

2 A new post-Hadrianic inscription (Hesperia, xxii, 1953, pp. 125 ff.), apparently dis-

carded for the cutter's mistake, commemorates a musician with an unintelligible phrase,

<μ ε*> Εὑρειπιδηνυ Σοφοκληα και Τιμόθεον ἐαυτῶ μελοποιήσαντα . . ., interpreting: 'the first

and only since Euripides, Sophocles, and Timotheus to compose the music to his own

words.' I cannot construe K. Latte's rendering in Eranos, lii (1954), pp. 125 ff.

Page 450

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

401

universal. In Augustan times a 'collegium symphoniacorum', engaged for public religious services in Rome, was recognized by a

special decree of the Senate as a legitimate association. The local unions finally amalgamated into one 'holy oecumenical synod of

artists in the service of Dionysus'.1 In spite of the majestic title—and high rates of pay—musicians stood much lower in the social

scale than doctors or teachers of grammar and rhetoric. The public recognition of Mesomedes was an exception and a scandal. In

archaic and classical times the professional composer as well as the citizen had been honoured for musical excellence. In Alexandrian

sources music is reduced to a topic for anecdotes of low life or oddments of curious information, which were later collected by

Athenaeus in the form of table-talk, suitably sandwiched between similar talk on famous courtesans and gastronomic delicacies.

'Unheard music is better than heard' was a Greek proverb in late antiquity. Against it Nero used to quote another: 'Unheard music

is unregarded.'2 Contemporary opinion was not on his side. No reputable woman would play an instrument too well, no gentleman

would dance unless in his cups, and a musical emperor was a disgrace:3 these views were held no less by upper-class Greeks than by

Romans. But both had inherited from Alexandria a profound reverence for the classical past; and classical authors had spoken respect-

fully of music. The music that Plato had admired was lost: what remained was Plato's admiration. He could never (so these later

minds assumed) have set such a value upon mere audible music, which they knew as a stimulant laid on at theatrical shows or at

banquets where girls from Cadiz did their celebrated hip-wobbling dances.4 It was impossible, by now, to realize that music had been

or could be a higher form of artistic expression: Plato must have meant some mysterious ethical alchemy which music could work upon

the motions of the soul, or else the harmonic science of 'number conceptual and immaterial' which enshrined truths of astronomy.

This was the 'unheard music' of the proverb. Through its own traditional prestige it was persistently cultivated, without relation to

any heard music, in the harmonic theory and philosophy of the later ancient world. The idea of music—so much holier than music itself—

1 A. H. M. Jones, The Greek City from Alexander to Justinian (Oxford, 1940), pp.

229 ff.; A. W. Pickard-Cambridge, The Dramatic Festivals of Athens (Oxford, 1953),

chap. vii; Dessau, Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae 4966.

2 Plut. De an. procr. in Tim. 26 (cf. Keats, Ode to a Grecian Urn 11–12); Suet. Nero 20.

3 Sall. Cat. 25; Cic. Pro Mur. 13; Tac. Ann. xiv. 14–15.

4 Martial, xiv. 203.

B 3608

Dd

Page 451

402

ANCIENT GREEK MUSIC

embraced not only cosmological doctrine but moral and medical belief. Staunching-songs, to be sung over a bleeding wound, were already known to Homer and Pindar. Sciatica, according to Theophrastus, was treated by playing the aulos over the part affected; musical healing was important in psychiatry, and incantation in the magical rites of Gnostic sects.1 The more intelligent valued harmonic theory for its mathematical beauty. But no specific motive, after all, is necessary to explain the pious transmission of an inherited and venerated branch of learning. Musica was established as the seventh of Varro's 'liberal arts', but it was not an art in the modern sense: it belonged to the quadrivium of mathematical subjects. The transference of the term musica to harmonic science in itself implies that for the liberal education music did not exist.

Our present difficulty in studying Greek music is, in the main, a consequence of this contempt of educated post-classical Greeks for the practical art, together with the obstinate survival of the mathematical subject miscalled musica in the ancient and medieval curriculum. Earlier Greeks had found in music an art which was seldom independent of verse, but was capable of co-operation in the highest poetic enterprises; then, at a critical moment, before music had adequate means of surviving memory, the standards of judgement were changed or shaken and the legacy of the past dissipated. From Alexandrian times, when the old oral schooling grew insufficient, education was based on books, and the unwritten had not the prestige of the unheard. If the classical music had still been extant and intelligible in writing, it could not have been neglected by so many curious and diligent generations.2 The post-classical music, if written, was seldom methodically stored, because it was not considered worth methodical study. Musical illiteracy in an age of book-learning is a sure index of the decline in the status and quality of the art. Isidore of Seville, whose erudition covered a great bulk of ancient writings, had never heard of the existence of notation. His words are an epitaph on the music of antiquity: 'Unless the sounds are retained by the memory of man, they perish, for they cannot be written.'3 Fifty years ago we hoped to recover indefinite quantities of music from papyri: now, on the contrary, papyrology has shown by cumulative evidence that the preservation of music in writing was casual and sporadic. Failing some lucky chance, our knowledge of Greek melo-

1 Hom. Od. xix. 457; Pind. Pyth. iii. 51 ; Theophr. fr. 87 and 88 (cf. Athen. 624a-b); Wellesz in Ambix iv (1951), pp. 145 ff.

2 The hypothesis that its loss is due to medieval scribes is no longer accepted.

3 Etym. iii. 15, ii (early seventh century A.D.).

Page 452

THE HISTORY OF GREEK MUSIC

403

poeia is likely to remain, for the most part, indirect. Nor can we now

look for any considerable help in the post-Aristoxenian harmonic

theorists, since we must reject the assumption that the musica of

the schools was directly concerned with heard melodic structures.

This is not to say that historical study of Greek music is impossible,

but only that certain kinds of evidence have yielded less than was

once expected. The subject therefore needs some reorientation to-

wards other problems. Work remains to be done on the deciphering

of such written pieces as we have or may find, but the central task is

still the better dating and interpretation of the large ancient literature

from which we can reconstruct the history of poetic forms and

rhythms, of musical criticism and ideas, of the social and intellectual

environment. This, though difficult, is not beyond reach. To recover

the music itself might have been preferable. But it was to Greek

music that a good scholar applied the wise motto: Quod vides perisse,

perditum ducas.1

1 G. Pasquali, ‘Ulrico di Wilamowitz-Moellendorff’, reprinted in Pagine Strava-

ganti2 (Florence, 1952), p. 95.

Page 453

X

ROMAN MUSIC

By J. E. Scott

INTRODUCTION

There is no lack of material for the study of music in the Roman world, but the greater part of it is concerned with the instruments rather than the music itself. What little is known about the music proper is evidence of unequal value and often open to more than one interpretation. We should further bear in mind that in the Graeco-Roman world we cannot without danger apply evidence from one part or period to the whole, and the dividing line between what is to be called Greek and what Roman in any of the arts is never quite certain.

Three main influences affected the Romans; the first was from the Etruscans, the second from the Greeks, and the third from the East. But Rome did not only borrow instruments and music; she adapted, blended, and developed what other nations had to offer. Certain aspects of ancient music may fairly be regarded as Roman, though other influences may have been present. Music of some kind was specially composed for the Latin comedy. The songs and instrumental calls of the Roman army were presumably of native origin; popular ‘lays of ancient Rome’, according to the elder Cato, had once been sung to the tibia at banquets, though they were extinct by Cicero’s time; and the colourful popular music of the Empire, with its emphasis on rhythm and percussion, was probably, in the main, an Italian growth separable from Greek traditions.

Some believed that foreign ostentation in music was effeminate and was leading to a lowering of moral standards. The archaic Law of the Twelve Tables, published in the middle of the fifth century B.C., forbade more than ten pipers at a funeral.1 A number of anti-luxury laws were passed to restrict ostentatious performances and banquets; one, for example, in 115 B.C. allowed only the Latin piper in Rome.2 But Roman expansion opened the way for new music and foreign influences. We can only mention here the great number of

1 Cicero, De leg. ii. 59.

2 Cassiodorus, Chron. A. U. 639.

Page 454

INTRODUCTION

405

Greeks who came to Rome in professional though humble capacities.

In the capital there existed numbers of foreign groups who kept their entity and brought their own forms of worship.1 Trade expanded enormously and brought in new fashions and new demands for luxury. New religions were first banned, then tolerated, and then often actively encouraged at different times by various emperors.

During the second Punic war the cult of the Great Mother, Cybele, which centred in Phrygia, was brought to Rome in 204 B.C. It never became completely Roman and citizens were not allowed to take part in the ceremonies or wear the peculiar dress. However, the priests brought with them their musical instruments and these—pipes, cymbals, and tambourines—soon gained great popularity. So we see portrayed, and read of, the Berecynthian pipe with bent horn (inflexo Berecyntia tibia cornu), the mad pipe (furiosa tibia), the hollow drums (inania tympana) and the din made by the attendants of the goddess as they thump the brass and the rumbling leather (aera deae comitas raucaque terga movent).2 Pl. 11 (a)3 shows one of the chief priests and some of the instruments. The twin Phrygian pipes and a tambourine hanging above are to be seen on the right, while a pair of cymbals are suspended on the left. (The other things do not concern us here.) These pipes were much more powerful than the twin straight ones; they could be rivalled only by the tuba. They tended to drive out the older kind, though they never completely succeeded in doing so. It is not possible here to discuss the spread of oriental cults in the west during the Empire, but they should not be forgotten in considering the spread of new ideas in music and the changes in musical instruments.4

It must not be thought, however, that Rome absorbed so much without difficulty. Polybius relates a story of Greek musicians who came to Rome in 167 B.C. to give a performance during victory games; their style of playing not being understood, they were laughed off the stage and compelled to stop their concert and improvise a kind

1 G. La Piana, ‘Foreign groups in Rome during the first centuries of the Empire’, in Harvard Theological Review, xx (1927), pp. 183 ff.; R. Paribeni, ‘Cantores Graeci nell’ ultimo secolo della repubblica in Roma’, in Raccolta di scritti in enore di Giacomo Lumbroso (Milan, 1925), p. 287.

2 Dionysius Halicarnassensis, Antiq. Rom. ii. 19. Ovid, Fasti iv. 181 f. Horace, A.P. 202.

3 Strong, La Scultura romana, ii (Florence, 1926), fig. 248; Jones, Catalogue of the Ancient Sculptures preserved in the Municipal Collections of Rome: Palazzo dei Conservatori (Oxford, 1926), pl. 100. There is an excellent detailed representation of the Phrygian pipes in Jones, ibid.: Museo Capitolino (Oxford, 1912), pl. 34A.

4 Cumont, Les Religions orientales dans le paganisme romain (Paris, 4th ed., 1929), is the standard work of reference.

Page 455

406

ROMAN MUSIC

of burlesque.1 Writers long continued to protest at the new styles.

Juvenal was bitter at the Syrian Orontes pouring into the Tiber with

its language, manners, and music.2

Roman authors sometimes write about music with a patronizing

air and with the notion that there existed nothing but a pale glimmer

of the past greatness of Greek music.3 This was fundamentally wrong;

music, though not to everyone's taste, was very much alive. There

was nothing amateurish about either instruments or performers.

Not only in Hellenistic times, but also during the Roman empire,

instruments became more complicated, capable of greater sonority;

new and improved experimental types were introduced. The evidence

of instruments has limitations. It is, for instance, quite unsafe to take

a particular instrument and say that because it could be played in

such and such a way and with such a technique, it must therefore

have been so played by its original owner. Nevertheless, the various

instruments used are in themselves typical of Roman musical occa-

sions, in which their part was often more prominent than in classical

Greece, although in most music the voice still retained its leading

position.

INSTRUMENTS4

Aerophones

The tuba was long and straight and made usually of bronze,

though it is known to have been made also of wood and leather,

and the usual length was about 1·3 metres. The instrument was

cylindrical in shape almost to the very bell end where it rather abruptly

swelled out. The mouthpiece—conical rather than cup-shaped—was

detachable and determined the quality of the note produced just as

its length determined its pitch. There was frequently a strap to hold

the instrument tight against the mouth when playing; this was

attached to a small loop near the bell end. Perhaps about eleven

harmonics could be obtained from the instrument, which was not, one

might imagine, a very easy one to handle. It was essentially an army

instrument and, like so much Roman military equipment, borrowed

from the Etruscans. The Greeks had a similar instrument, the salpinx,

perhaps rather shorter in length and with a more prominent bell end

1 Polybius, xxx. 22.

2 Juvenal, iii. 62. Nor did he think much of the raised status of the cornicines: iii. 34.

3 Cf. pp. 337 and 401.

4 For further information see the books and articles listed in the Bibliography.

Page 456

PLATE XI

(a)

(a) A priest of Cybele. Relief showing cymbals, tympanum, and twin Phrygian pipes (c. A.D. 150). See page 405

(b)

(b) Roman musicians at the circus. Mosaic showing the tuba, hydraulus with female player, and cornu (late 1st century A.D.)

ROMAN INSTRUMENTS

Page 458

which in addition to its use in the army was a popular solo instrument

in the musical contests.

The cornu, also of bronze but originally of horn, was conical in

section and curved into rather more than half a circle. A supporting

cross-bar allowed it to be played carried over the shoulder with the

bell end aloft over the player's head and facing in the same direction

as the player. Like the tuba, it had a detachable mouth-piece, ap-

parently rather longer than the tuba's. The cornu was Etruscan in

origin and at first used mostly for military purposes.

The bucina is often confused with the cornu, and was so confused

in Roman times, but there is no doubt that it was a separate instru-

ment; right to the end the bucinator (as the player on this instrument

was called) was sharply distinguished from the cornicen. There is no

certain representation of it in the Roman world. Tombstones of

cornicines sometimes show the cornu, but the bucinator's never his

bucina. Descriptions of the instrument are contradictory1 but prob-

ably it was originally the animal's horn made into an instrument.

Certainly it was intimately connected with the countryman and it

became in the army the instrument for giving non-tactical signals. It

was less powerful than the tuba or cornu and could not be used by

itself in the heat of battle.

The lituus was of bronze and Etruscan in origin.2 It was J-shaped

with a long extension to the straight part, generically a natural horn

with a greatly enlarged mouth-piece. The lituus found at Caere and

now in the Vatican is 140 cm. long. The instrument is in g and pro-

duces six notes; another lituus, found in the Rhine near Düsseldorf is

in a. Its sound is that of a soft trumpet. This was also an army instru-

ment though it was used on state occasions.3

The aulos or tibia was a reed instrument known to the East Mediter-

ranean world generally.4 It was nearly always played in pairs with the

help of a φορβειά (Lat. capistrum; Eng. mouth band) to steady the twin

instruments in the mouth and to help to maintain a constant pressure

of wind (see pl. 12). The short pipes with perhaps three or four holes

were known in very early Roman times. There were several Greek

types used for different purposes. In the late Republic and early

Empire, pipes grew longer, perhaps 2 feet or more in length. The

1 For instance, see the descriptions in the works of reference listed in the Bibliography.

2 The Caere lituus is from an Etruscan grave. In general see McCartney, 'Military

indebtedness of early Rome to Etruria', Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome

(Bergamo, 1915), p. 121.

3 Cf. F. Behn, Musikinstrumente im Altertum u. frühen Mittelalter (Stuttgart, 1954), pp.

137-8.

4 See pp. 269, 280, and 380-1.

Page 459

408

ROMAN MUSIC

musical range was extended by increasing the number of holes to as many as fifteen. Mechanical devices were used, when required, to cover certain of the holes.1 The single cross-flute is known to have existed2 but it is rare. Phrygian pipes were probably brought to Rome when the worship of Magna Mater was introduced in the year 204 B.C.; these powerful instruments were used in the ritual but appear to have become popular everywhere; one pipe was straight, the other ended in a large curved bell.3

The utricularius or ascaules, in English ‘bagpipe’, came from the East. (It is necessary to be careful in identifying the instrument, for utricularius usually meant wine trader, and not the performer.) One or two genuine representations in art are known;4 many, including one from Richborough, are false.

The organ, said to have been invented in Alexandria in the third century B.C.,5 became a most important instrument in imperial times. The evidence from literature is extensive but by itself insufficient to explain the instrument completely. Archaeology supplies more evidence: there are two portable organs from Pompeii, and two terra-cotta models,6 while the instrument is shown on a number of mosaics and contorniates. At Aquincum the remains of an organ were found among the debris of a cellar into which it had fallen from a club-house above during a fire. The date is fixed at A.D. 228 by an inscription7 attached to the instrument. There are four ranks of pipes, thirteen in each, the remains of levers, sliders, and a sounding board. Organs were worked usually by water pressure, hence the name hydraulis, though the pneumatic action was also in use, especially in later times.

The syrinx (panpipes) was more the instrument of the shepherd and the instrument of mythology than a serious musical instrument.

1 There is a convenient summary in the Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford, 1949), p. 589.

2 e.g. Giglioli, L’Arte Etrusca (Milan, 1935), pl. cccc vii, from Perugia.

3 This was the tibia Berecynthia mentioned by Horace, Odes, iii. 19, 18.

4 See the dictionaries listed in the Bibliography. The poem Copa, sometimes attributed to Vergil, contains a description of what can only be the bagpipes.

5 By Ctesibius, Athenaeus, iv. p. 174. See, however, the important article by Apel, ‘Early History of the Organ’, in Speculum, xxiii (1948), p. 191, where the literary evidence is considered in detail.

6 A photograph of the bronze portable organs is in Anderson 25880. There is a convenient illustration in the Catalogue of the Mostra Augustea della Romanita (Rome, 1938), plate cxlii, of some reconstructions made for the exhibition.

7 Nagy, Die Orgel von Aquincum (Budapest, 1934), was the original work, which I have not been able to see. See also Hyde, ‘An Inscribed Water Organ’, Transactions of the American Philological Association lxix (1938), p. 394. Most of the reproductions of the water organ have been collected and studied by Mercurelli in Rivista di Archeologia cristiana xv (1938), p. 73.

Page 460

Reeds, in number up to a dozen or so, were joined together like a raft and stopped with wax at one end. The lengths were graded and the player blew across the open mouths, moving the instrument as he desired.

Chordophones

The Greek lyre (λύρα) and kithara were distinct instruments. In Roman times the lyre tended to die out and the kithara acquired more strings; the sounding-board became larger and more unwieldy. The instrument was now often played sitting down.1 It remained to the end the king of instruments for the soloist.

Harps with large numbers of strings were, of course, well known to the Greeks. In the Roman world they become more popular.2 They were played sitting down with the instrument resting on the knees. Other stringed instruments came into use, the most interesting of which was the pandura or pandore with long thin neck and finger-board.3

Idiophones

There were several instruments of percussion which can only be mentioned here. The scabellum was a hinged flapping board of wood or metal worked by the foot and used for beating time.4 The sistrum was an Egyptian rattle used in the worship of Isis,5 and there were several kinds of cymbals and tambourines, bells and whistles.6

Literary Description

It is interesting to notice in both literature and in art how music and musical instruments are portrayed by writers or artists who do not possess the musical knowledge required for a precise description. For example, in the poem Aetna (lines 297 ff.) the author wishes to describe the organ being played; his observant eye has perceived the essential features, though he is unable or unwilling to use the technical terms.

1 These statements are based on a survey of the surviving illustrations, especially in Pompeii.

2 e.g. Juvenal, Satires, iii. 64 tells of the chordae obliquae brought to Rome from the East.

3 See p. 273.

4 For references see the works listed in the Bibliography. See also below, p. 414, for the terra-cotta from Alexandria.

5 See p. 267.

6 Cf. the well-known mosaic of street musicians, now in the Naples Museum, from Pompeii, made by Dioscorides of Samos.

Page 461

410

ROMAN MUSIC

carmineque irriguo magnis cortina theatris

imparibus numerosa modis canit arte regentis,

quae tenuem impellens animam subremigat unda.

(Just as in some vast theatre, a water organ whose musical modes harmonise through their unequal pipes, sounds its water-worked music thanks

to the organist's skill, which starts a small draught of air while causing a rowing movement in the water below.)1

Here we have in a few words what an intelligent onlooker sees: the caldron-shaped body, the row of different-sized pipes, the organist

controlling the instrument, and the rowing-like action of the blowers. Sometimes, of course, the writer has the accurate knowledge and

expresses it in the form of an enigma. Thus Julian describes the organ, with pneumatic action and not worked by water.2

I see reeds, or pipes, of a different kind: I ween that from another, a metallic soil, they have perchance rather sprung up. They are agitated

wildly, and not by our breath; but a blast, rushing from within the hollow of a bull's hide, passes underneath, below the foundation of the well-

pierced pipes, and a skilled artist, possessed of mímble fingers, regulates by his wandering touch the connecting rods of the pipes, and these rods,

softly springing to his touch, express (squeeze out) the song.

Perhaps the nearest description is of the double pipes:

εἰς ἄνemos· δὺο νῆες· ἐρέttosιν δέκα ναûται·

εἰς δὲ κυβερνήτης ἀμφοτέρας ἐλάει.

(One wind, two ships, ten sailors rowing, and one steersman directs both.)3

SOCIAL STATUS OF MUSICIANS

In the Roman world musicians held a place of honour from the earliest times. In the list of trade guilds into which the people of Rome

were traditionally divided by Numa, successor to Romulus the first king of Rome, pipers come first.4 If the sacred pipers went on strike,

as they once did, the work of the State was held up; the pipers were recalled to duty by a trick and a bribe.5 A boy piper was usually

present near the altar at a sacrifice, but he played not for the music's own sake but to cover up any sound that might be accidentally heard

1 Minor Latin Poets (Loeb Classical Library), p. 386. Duff's translation.

2 Julian, Epig. ii. W. Chappell's translation in his History of Music vol. i (London, 1874).

3 Anth. Pal. xiv. 14. Loeb Classical Library.

4 Plutarch, Numa 17. For some of the duties of the State pipers see Ovid, Fasti vi. 657. A number of inscriptions attest to the guild organization. A piper is included among

the list of magistrates' officials at Urso (Spain) in 44 B.C. Riccobono, Fontes Iuris Romani

Antejustiniani. Leges (Florence, 1941), p. 177. On the guilds, see also p. 401.

5 Livy, ix. 30. Plutarch, Qu. Rom. 55.

Page 462

in the vicinity and thereby spoil the ceremony.1 This scene is portrayed many times in Roman art, always with the short auloi. On festal occasions, or when the emperor was welcomed on his return home, there was always music to greet him.2 A tuba player is normally seen near the emperor at his triumph.3 There is no doubt that the way in which music could stimulate or calm a crowd was well known in the ancient world and that much use was made of this knowledge.4

In the army from the days of the Servian reforms, usually regarded as military in character, when in the sixth century B.C. tuba and cornu players (but not bucina players) were named as an official class in the Roman list of citizens, musicians had a well-defined status.5 From inscriptions we learn that the order of seniority was tuba player, cornu player, and lastly bucina player.6 Like other professional groups, they would at times organize themselves into clubs with elaborate rules and conditions of entry. Thus, for example, when a member joined he paid into the common chest 750 denarii, and when he died or got his discharge, or if he were reduced in rank, or promoted inside the legion, or if he had to make an unwelcome voyage overseas, he or his heir received stated sums. This was in the early years of the third century A.D.7

MILITARY MUSIC

In the army orders were given on different instruments. The tuba sounded the attack or retreat, and the time for the posting of sentries. The bucina, which could scarcely be heard outside the camp if there was much noise, sounded the watches; it was superseded later for this duty by the cornu which was also responsible for the sounding of the relief for the sentries.8 There were well-known calls. Pollux tells of

1 Brendel has collected a number of examples in his article, ‘Immolatio Boum’, Römische Mitteilungen, xlv (Munich, 1930), p. 196.

2 Alföldi, ‘Die Ausgestaltung des monarchischen Zeremoniells am römischen Kaiserhofe’, Römische Mitteilungen, xlix (1934), p. 79.

3 See the Triumph of Marcus Aurelius in Strong, op. cit., fig. 162.

4 Quintilian, Inst. orat. ix. 4 i. 10.

5 H. Last, ‘The Servian Reforms’, in Journal of Roman Studies, xxxv (1945), p. 34, where the sources are discussed.

6 e.g. C.I.L. viii. 2564. There is a list of musicians in the army in Ephemeris Epigraphica, iv (Rome, 1881), p. 374, but it needs to be brought up to date.

7 Tubicines, I.L.S. 9096 (A.D. 202–5); Cornicines, C.I.L. viii. 2557 + 18050 = I.L.S. 2354 (A.D. 203). They have been discussed several times. A good account is by Carcopino in Rendiconti della Pontif. Acad. Rom. di Archeol. series 3, iv (1926), p. 217.

8 This is a simplified account applicable to the Republican period; there were changes in procedure in later time. A convenient method of approach is to work through the articles on the separate instruments, so far as they are published, in the Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (Leipzig, 1900). Note also the different attempts to describe the sounds, e.g. Ennius on the tuba (taratantara), frag. 143.

Page 463

412

ROMAN MUSIC

four for the trumpet: the setting off or attack, the call of encouragement during battle, the retreat, and the sign to halt or encamp.1 In the sixth century A.D. Procopius says that the Roman army in the old days had two calls: the charge and the retreat. Sometimes they must have been misunderstood, coming as they did from the same instrument. He therefore suggested to Belisarius that the cavalry trumpet, lighter in weight, being made of leather and thin wood, should sound the charge; while the bronze trumpet of the infantry, which would be of a different sound, should sound the retreat when a more distinctive call was necessary in the noise of battle.2

Several stories are told of Roman generals who kept musicians in empty camps after the army had moved on; they remained sounding the regular calls to deceive the enemy. At other times a trumpet player would be sent by himself away from the main body so that the enemy would get a wrong impression of the position of the army.3 These were well-worn tricks and they show how the various calls were identified with army life. Frequently in literature, battle or camp life was described in terms of one or other of the instruments; thus in medias tubas would mean 'into the midst of the battle', and post lituos could be translated 'after the battle was over'.4 In camp and on the march the cornu players stayed near the standards, giving the sign to move off and with the tuba encouraging the men in battle. Thus when the Temple of the Sun at Palmyra was pillaged by the aquiliferi, vexilliferi, and the draconarius (different kinds of standard bearers) in A.D. 272, under Aurelian, the players of the cornu and the lituus of the legion also took part.5 In art the cornu players are usually placed hard by the standards.6

Twice a year, on 23 March and 23 May, the sacred trumpets were symbolically purified at a ceremony called Tubilustrium.7 There is reason to believe that this originally had to do with the opening of the new campaigning season. It shows the intimate connexion that existed between the instrument and military life. In the navy, a comparatively late development with Rome, the need for call signs was not so great, though there is some evidence for the use of music to keep oarsmen

1 Pollux, iv. 85. 2 Procopius, Bell. Goth. vi. 23. 3 e.g. Frontinus, Strat. i. 5; Livy, ii. 64. 4 Claudian, de con. Stil. iii, pref. 12, 13. 5 Historia Augusta. Vita Aurel. xxxi. 7. 6 e.g. Trajan's army marching over the bridge of boats across the Danube in Strong, op. cit., figs. 97/98. There is a novel view of this scene in La Colonna Traiana (Rome, 1942), pl. 15. 7 C.I.L. i2, 1, p. 313. Quasten, Musik und Gesang in den Kulten der heidnischen Antike und christlichen Frühzeit (Münster, 1930), esp. pp. 16–25, gives an account of Roman state music, including the Tubilustrium and the College of Pipers.

Page 464

in time.1 Even though the tuba was to become a popular solo instru-

ment and often heard with other instruments in the shows, this con-

nexion with war was never forgotten. When L. Norbanus Flaccus, a

keen player of the tuba, was heard practising on this instrument on the

day he entered into his consulate in A.D. 19, it was taken as a bad

omen that the consul should be heard playing on an instrument

associated with war.2

MILITARY MUSIC

413

MUSIC IN EVERYDAY LIFE

Interest in music increased during the Empire. In private life,

whether it was a little light music after supper at Pliny's villa or a

noisy trumpet playing at Trimalchio's dinner party, music was in uni-

versal demand.3 The best entertainment, Martial believes, is where

there is no piper to drown the conversation, implying that a man is

fortunate if he finds that when he goes out to dinner.4 Petronius tells

of a man of fashion who possessed a clock in his dining room with a

uniformed bucina player to tell him how much of his life was lost and

gone.5 Music was employed at funerals from earliest Roman times;

later no funeral was complete without wailing pipes and trumpets

playing a last call to the dead. Trimalchio, very drunk, orders a mock

funeral and the trumpeters break into a loud funeral march (consonuere

cornicines funebri strepitu).6 The phrase, ‘You may send for the

trumpeters’ (ad tubicines mittas) signifies ‘prepare for the funeral’.7

So, too, at other ceremonies and on state occasions, music played an

increasingly important part.8 Large choirs sang and more ensemble

playing was demanded.9

Indoor concerts took place in the houses of the rich. Pl. 12, a

fresco found at Herculaneum, now in the Naples Museum, shows a

duet between a piper and a kithara player. Before an attentive

audience the piper vigorously plays her two very long straight pipes;

she wears the usual mouth band, and her bulging cheeks and eyes

1 Starr, The Roman Imperial Navy (Cornell, 1941), pp. 56 and 59.

2 Cassius Dio, lvii. 18.

3 Pliny, Ep. ix. 36. Petronius, Satiricon (Cena Trimalchionis), e.g. c. 26. Coleman-

Norton has made a study of musical terms and expressions from literature which were

known or could have been known to Cicero in ‘Cicero Musicus’, Journal of the American

Musicological Society, i (1948), pp. 3-22.

4 Martial, ix. 77.

5 Petronius, Sat. 26.

6 Ibid. 78.

7 Ibid. 129.

8 For the carmen saeculare see Gagé, ‘Recherches sur les Jeux séculaires’, Les Belles

Lettres, Paris (1934), pp. 45 f.

9 There is a charming painting from Ostia of a small group of boys singing in honour

of Diana. This is reproduced in Strong, Art in Ancient Rome, ii (London, 1929), p. 28.

Page 465

414

ROMAN MUSIC

indicate the intensity of her performance. The kithara player uses the

developed form of the instrument; not so graceful and finely balanced

as the classical Greek version, it is of more solid construction and

capable of hard wear and tear. The arms are straight and there is a

strong cross-bar to hold the tuning pegs, seven of which are shown,

though the painter has indicated at least a dozen strings. The instru-

ment is held by an arm-strap, though this is not clear in the painting;

it is played with a plectrum in the right hand, the left hand plucking

or damping the strings as required. It will be noticed that the per-

formers do not play from notated music.

Small bands of street musicians paraded in the streets playing pipe,

cymbal, and tambourine. Jugglers and acrobats entertained the

crowds. The one-man band showed how feet, arms, hands, and voice

could be used at the same time. There is an interesting terra-cotta

from Alexandria, recently misunderstood, which is worth considering

in greater detail;1 it is 16·7 centimetres high and represents an old man

playing a large syrinx with his left hand. Under his left arm he presses

against his side a bag with a single pipe attached; he holds this pipe

with his right hand, playing a simple tune or drone; his right foot

plays a scabellum. There is no connexion between the bag and the

syrinx; this is not an early form of portable organ as has been sug-

gested; it is the bagpipe played with other instruments. A young

assistant claps a pair of miniature cymbals as his master plays.

MUSIC IN THE THEATRE

In 389 B.C. performances of simple stage plays with musical accom-

paniment (saturae modis impletae) took place, with Etruscan actors

brought to Rome to dance to music played on the pipes.2 This native

drama was driven off the stage by innovations from Greece and took

on a literary form. More music, with more than one kind of pipe,

came into use in Latin versions of Greek comedies. The prefaces to

Terence’s plays tell of four kinds besides giving the name of the com-

poser.3 Music was played also during the intervals. Atellana and

mimes were broad farces, which tended to drive out comedy. Played

by a very few actors, male and female, they were vulgar and often

obscene but attracted great popularity.4

1 Weber, Die Ägyptisch-griechischen Terrakotten (Berlin, 1914), pl. 30, no. 324;

Sachs, History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940), pl. viiic.

2 Livy, vii. 2.

3 e.g. Didascalia to Terence’s Phormio: ‘Modos fecit Flaccus Claudi tibiis inpari-

bus.’

4 Duff, Literary History of Rome (London, 1909), p. 221.

Page 466

PLATE XII

A ROMAN CONCERT

Showing twin pipes and kithara. From a fresco at Herculaneum

See page 413

Page 468

MUSIC IN THE THEATRE

415

A most interesting papyrus gives a number of cues for the music.

It dates from the second century or end of the first century A.D. The

identification of the marks is far from certain, but they include cues

for the drums, singly, five times or many times, for the striking of

some instrument (perhaps cymbals or scabellum), and two others

which cannot be explained with any degree of certainty, possibly for

castanets and pipe. It must be explained that these are only cues; no

fragments of the music, if indeed it ever consisted of more than per-

cussion effects, exist.

The pantomime (pantomimus means the single actor who takes

part) was quite different from the mime. Its themes were from

mythology and it was essentially a dramatic dance for a single per-

former, accompanied by chorus and orchestra. The actors were male

until very late times. Predominantly, though not exclusively, Roman,

by the time of Augustus it was established in the capital. The orchestra

included pipes, panpipes, cymbals, and stringed instruments; time

was kept by the scabellum. In some respects the pantomime may be

regarded as the successor to tragedy on the Roman stage. It made

certain demands of the audience: the facts of the story must be

known, the different steps of the dance had to be recognized; it

required a cultivated taste and never became entertainment for the

masses. The music took second place to the dancing. 'There reigns

the art of dancing', says Plutarch, 'to which music is almost entirely

subordinated.'

In the amphitheatre a show began with a procession. Led by

trumpet and horn players, the principal performers with decorated

helmets marched into the arena. The start of the performance was

announced by the tuba and a small orchestra played in the back-

ground. Pl. 11 (b) shows part of a mosaic from Zliten in North Africa,

with different kinds of gladiators. The orchestra consists of a water

organ, a tuba player, and two cornu players. The organ is on a low

stand; the reservoirs for the water are on either side. A number of

surviving illustrations of similar scenes bear witness to the enormous

popularity of the amphitheatre shows.

At times the desire for noise and large numbers of performers led

Greek Literary Papyri, Poetry, i, no. 76. Loeb Classical Library, ed. D. L. Page.

Robert, 'Pantomimen im griechischen Orient', Hermes, lxv (1930), p. 106. Lucian,

De Salt., passim.

The players of the scabellum (scabellarii) had their own guild.

Plutarch, Quaest. conviv. ix. 15.

Aurigemma, 'I mosaici di Zliten' (Africa Italiana, ii, Rome, 1926). For the pompa

and other scenes in the amphitheatre, see the long article 'Il rilievo gladiatorio di Chieti'

by Ghislanzoni in Monumenti Antichi (Rome), xix. 1908, col. 541.

Page 469

416

ROMAN MUSIC

to incredible extravagance. Ammianus Marcellinus tells of kitharas as large as carriages.1 In A.D. 284 Carinus gave a series of games to the Romans at which one hundred trumpets played together; others taking part included a hundred horn blowers and two hundred pipers of different kinds. It was the most-talked-of event of the year.2 The mania for novelty and large-scale entertainment was encouraged by those in authority, who saw in this a means of distracting the attention of the masses from action in the political field.

RECITALS AND VIRTUOSI

Authors ‘published’ by big public readings and there are numerous references to clients dutifully listening to their patron’s dull books. Under the Empire dramatic recitals became popular, even of works which had never been intended for declamation to music. The Greek practice of singing and accompanying oneself on the kithara was known in the Greek cities of the south and to a lesser degree in Rome and the western provinces, but it was a foreign intrusion and, though actively sponsored by different emperors and despite hero-worship of the star performers, did not succeed in becoming Romanized. The principal performers and the best teachers, so far as we can tell, were Greek. This was the form of art that Nero wished to excel in.3

Despite the amount of ensemble playing known to have existed, it was the soloist and, above all, the brilliant virtuoso who caught the fancy of the Romans. Successful individual players were mobbed by the crowd, paid fantastic engagement fees, and allowed to indulge in any amount of artistic temperament off stage or on stage. Such artists rarely settled in any place for long; they had full time-tables of bookings, and in any event it is doubtful whether there was enough popular demand for a man to remain very long in one place. These artists, too, banded themselves into professional groups not unlike trade unions, and by the second century A.D. had a practical monopoly.4 The artist, when he became well known, would be honoured by his native city and perhaps given honorary citizenships of other cities; statues would be set up to him.

1 Ammianus Marcellinus, xiv. 6, 18.

2 Vita Carini, xix.

3 See p. 399.

4 Dionysiac artists: see Pauly-Wissowa, art. ‘technitai’ in Real-Encyclopädie. For the spreading of professionalism in the Hellenistic world, and the peripatetic life, see Rostovtzeff, Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Oxford, 1941), pp. 1077 f. and 1113.

Page 470

RECITALS AND VIRTUOSI

417

On special occasions a star performer might receive a very large fee, in money or otherwise. Vespasian, for all his covetousness, rewarded his artists well. When the theatre of Marcellus was reopened he hired performers, paying no less than 400,000 sesterces to the tragic actor Apollinaris, 200,000 sesterces to Terpnus and Diodorus the citharoedi, as well as other lesser amounts to others who took part.1 (For very rough calculation the sestertius was worth about 2d.) The amount of prize money a successful musician might win was considerable. Two inscriptions from Aphrodisias in Asia Minor2 give lists of prize money for different contests; the highest prize was 3,250 denarii for the first citharoedus. It would not be safe to build much on so little evidence, but so far as they go, they are of importance at least for one part of the world.

Unfortunately we know practically nothing about the style of playing or what the music was like. Sometimes it was only a question of how loud and how long a note could be played, a test of physique and power of lung.3 There is little doubt, however, that the standard of performance was high and the technique elaborate. Competition was keen, and audiences were critical.4 Not even the hired claque, so commonly employed, would cover up poor playing or indifferent singing. Many of the pieces played were intimately known by the crowd and favourite tunes were hummed in the street.5

IMPERIAL AMATEURS

The amateur vied with the professional though there was always a social gap between the two. Society was shocked by Nero not because of his appearing as a musician, but because he posed as a professional artist. Many men and women of society became distinguished amateurs. The Augustan histories tell of many emperors who were good players. Hadrian6 boasted openly of his knowledge of kithara playing and singing; Verus7 travelled about through Corinth and Athens with instrumentalists and singers, and on his return from the Parthian war brought from Syria players of stringed instruments and pipers; Commodus8 is described as adept in certain arts not becoming to an emperor, one of which was singing; Elagabalus9 sang, danced,

1 Suetonius, Vesp. 19.

2 C.I.G. 2758 and 2759. There is a convenient translation in Tenney Frank, Economic Survey of Rome, iv (Baltimore, 1938), p. 856.

3 Galen, viii. 287.

4 In general, see the chapters in Friedländer, Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms, ii (Leipzig, 9th–10th ed., 1921–3), pp. 161 ff.

5 Ibid., p. 175.

6 Vita Had. xiv. 9.

7 Vita Veri, vi. 9; viii. 11.

8 Vita Comm. i. 8.

9 Vita Elagab. xxxii. 8.

B 3608

B e

Page 471

418

ROMAN MUSIC

declaimed to the pipes, played on the trumpet, the pandura, and the organ; Severus Alexander1 had a taste for music and could play on the lyre, pipe, organ, and trumpet, though he never played the last when he became Emperor.

Others, from the first century, had been interested in the art, but none like Nero. He wished to be taken seriously as a musician and there is every reason to believe that he had considerable, though not exceptional, natural ability. Music was only one of his many interests, but he trained hard and practised diligently. The services of Terpnus, a well-known singer to the kithara, were obtained when he became Emperor and lessons went on late into the night. He endured bodily discomfort, lying on his back with a metal weight on his chest, taking purges, refraining from various fruits and meat that were supposed to injure the voice, indeed trying all the tricks of the profession to develop his voice. At one time he refused to address his soldiers in person so as to rest his voice, and he would have a singing teacher present to see that he never strained it. Before appearing in public he made detailed plans for his claque who, more than 5,000 strong, were divided into groups and taught the various kinds of applause that would ensure their master the success he so earnestly longed for. We are told of three kinds of applause; bombi (probably like the buzzing of bees), imbrices (like rain or hail on the roof), and testae (like the crashing of pots together). The whole account given by Suetonius in his life of Nero is most amusing. Extremely jealous of possible rivals, the Emperor was highly sensitive about his reputation as a musician. During the rebellion of Vindex nothing excited him so much as the low opinion Vindex expressed about him as a kithara player. To the very end of his life he was interested in new kinds of instruments and promised to appear in person at the victory games, playing on different instruments, among which were different kinds of organ and the bagpipe.2

Nero made his first public appearance in his own palace at Rome in A.D. 59, at the age of twenty-two. In 64 he took part in the contests at Naples, and in 65 appeared as a citharoedus (i.e. sang and played on the kithara) in the theatre of Pompey in Rome. Towards the end of 66 he went on a professional tour of Greece, returning publicly in the beginning of 68. No doubt the judges at the different contests in which he took part would hesitate before refusing a prize; his successes, therefore, need not be taken too seriously. Yet we know that

1 Vita Alex. xxvii. 5, 9.

2 Suetonius, Nero, xli, liv.

Page 472

IMPERIAL AMATEURS

419

he kept to the rules, adopted a humble attitude, and on at least one occasion was very nervous lest a mistake he had just made should be noticed and lose him points.

MUSIC TEACHING

Details of what pay music teachers in schools received are not numerous, though there is a little information from Teos, in Asia Minor, in the late third or early second century B.C.1 Three teachers of reading and writing in an elementary school were paid sums from 600 to 500 drachmas, the two teachers of gymnastics received 500, and the music teacher 700. His duties were to give instruction in music (i.e. theory) and in playing the kithara with the plectrum and with the fingers; no mention of instruction on the pipes or any other musical instrument; some of the boys were taught theory only; not all the boys in the school received music lessons. There was an examination in music at the end of the year to see how the pupils had benefited by the instruction. The salary mentioned was comparatively generous and indicates the importance attached to adequate musical training. (The salary of a skilled workman was about one drachma a day at this time; the highest recorded salary from the Hellenistic world is that of a doctor who received 1,000 drachmas a year.)2

From Alexandria comes a papyrus of unique interest3 of the year 13 B.C., in the form of an apprenticeship contract between the owner of a slave and a music teacher. The papyrus is not in good condition and there are several technical terms which are not yet fully understood. However, the boy was to be taught to play various tunes on specified instruments and also to be able to accompany other performers; he was to be tested by an independent body of three, suitably qualified. The payment of one hundred drachmas was to be made in two parts, and the period of the contract was a year. A lot had to be learnt in that time and it is likely the slave had some knowledge before he started.

There is reason to believe that music was learned not from a written text but by ear.4 This conclusion must be treated with reserve, but in art remains musicians are always represented as playing by ear or

1 Dittenberger, Sylloge (3rd. ed., Leipzig, 1915-24), 578. Hansen, Attalids of Pergamon (Ithaca N.Y., 1947), p. 354.

2 Tarn, Hellenistic Civilization (London, 2nd ed. 1930), p. 100; A. Wilhelm, Neue Beiträge zur griechischen Inschriftenkunde (Vienna, 1915), p. 54.

3 Aegyptische Urkunden aus den koniglichen Museen zu Berlin, 1125. Westermann in Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, x (1924), p. 143.

4 H.-I. Marrou, ‘MEΛOΓPAΦIA’, L’Antiquité classique (Brussels), xv (1946), p .289.

Page 473

420

ROMAN MUSIC

memory. A number of paintings show scenes from mythology of master teaching pupil to play on the pipes or the lyre; the master explains, shows how the instrument should be held, then lets the pupil try for himself, gently controlling an awkward position by guiding the pupil's arms and hands. Other scenes depict the pupil imitating the master as he plays, carrying out with his fingers the action as he sees it. Although these are scenes from mythology, it is reasonable to suppose that the painters incorporated in their work scenes from everyday life.1

There are many such gaps in our knowledge of Roman music, and we can only hope that new material will come to light. At present there is enough to see the main picture, though it be blurred in places and may always remain unfinished.

1 e.g. paintings of Marsyas teaching Olympus to play the pipes.

Page 474

XI

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

By Henry George Farmer

ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION

In the history of civilization, Islam stands as the chief animating idea culturally between the Dark Ages and the Renaissance. Yet when one speaks of Islamic civilization a purely sociological connotation is implied, since in spite of its religious basis and its pristine insularity, it spread over and conditioned a quarter of the then known world, giving rise to a mode of life which became a cynosure for all eyes beyond its boundaries. The explanation of this is simple enough. When the revelations of Muḥammad flashed on the world in the seventh century of the Christian era, a message was delivered which could not be confined to the Hijaz, the cradle of Islam. As a result, within three-quarters of a century, the banner of the Prophet was planted eastward at the extremities of Transoxiana, southward by the banks of the Indus, northward to the shores of the Black Sea, and westward on the slopes of the Pyrenees.

Out of this newly won empire arose a civilization which dwindled that of much of the rest of the world into insignificance. From Samarcand in the east to Cordova in the west, the grandeur of courts, the fame of colleges, and the wealth of bazaars became a byword. Not since the days of Grecian splendour had art, science, and literature shone with such radiance, nor had inventions, discoveries, and improvements excited so much wonderment. It was Islam in its sociological trend which produced this sublimation, although it was its religious basis that was the causa causans,1 since it preached a universal brotherhood which knew no racial or national distinctions, and saw no geographical boundaries. Similarly, while it was an Arabian polity which made this cultural elevation possible, and while the medium of most of its dissemination was Arabic, many other peoples of the Near and Middle East, and even of the European West, were producers and partakers of this culture.

In such wide dominions it was inevitable that alien notions should impose themselves on the culture of the Arab conquerors and, in

1 See the remarks of the editor of The Legacy of Islam (Oxford, 1931), p. v.

Page 475

422

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

consequence, what was once purely Arabian became considerably

modified, tempered, and even replaced by other cultures, yet it was

this fusion of ideas that gave greater mobility to the new civilization

which was to have so vital an influence on the western world. Many

peoples of the Near and Middle East, and of western Europe also,

contributed to this Islamic civilization: Arab, Turk, Kurd, Persian,

Aramaean, Syrian, Egyptian, Greek, and Goth. In the East, two lands

especially played a prominent part in the music of this new cultural

uprising, Persia and Syria; and in the West, Spain. The role of Greece

was more in the theoretical sphere, through the influence of the works

of authors centuries dead.

Mesopotamia and Persia Syria and Egypt Spain and North Africa

Orthodox Caliphs . . . . . 632

Conquest of Persia . . . . . 638

Conquest of Syria . . . . . 642

Umayyad Caliphs . . . . 647

Conquest of Egypt . . . . . 661

Conquest of N. Africa . 708

'Abbāsid Caliphs . Conquest of Spain . . . 713

Umayyad Caliphs (Spain) . . . 750

Buwaihids . . Fāṭimid Caliphs . . . 909

Petty Kings (Spain) . . . 932

Saljūqs . . . . . . 1016

Khwārizmī Shāhs . . . . . 1037

Almoravides(Spain&Africa) 1077

Saljūqs (Syria) . . . . . 1086

Almohades (Spain & Africa) 1094

Ayyūbids . . . . . 1130

Naṣrids (Granada) . . . . 1169

Mughals. Fall of Baghḍad . . . . 1232

Tīmūrids . . . . . . 1250

Mamlūk Turks . . . . . 1256

Mamlūk Circassians . . . . 1369

Fall of Granada . . . . 1382

Ṣafawids . . . . . . 1492

Ottoman Turks . . Ottoman Turks . . . . 1502

THE CULTURAL BACKGROUND

The idea that Arabia has ever been a land of nomads and barbarism

has long disappeared. Archaeological remains have revealed traces of

a high stage of civilization in the ancient Arabian past, and we now

know that this land was once a trading centre of the world which had

a profound influence on the destinies of the East.1 This could scarcely

have been otherwise, since not only Syria and Phoenicia, but much of

Arabia, was under the irresistible influence of Mesopotamian culture

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, i (Leiden, 1913-38), pp. 377-80.

Page 476

THE CULTURAL BACKGROUND

423

as far back as the third millennium B.C. While political and commercial

ties between these lands, where practically the same tongue prevailed,

must have contributed to a certain level of melioration, there was also

a fundamental reason for the persistence of cultural conformity, in

that the urban population of both the Mesopotamian and Syrian

plains was being continually reinforced by nomadic and country

elements from the peninsula itself, a flux which secured the main-

tenance and revitalizing of the pristine Semitic features of their

culture.1 What we know of the outward visible signs of music and

religion in ancient Arabia, partly confirms the view that the Arabs of

the peninsula were the inheritors and conservators of much of the

great Mesopotamian culture of the past.

Music, as found in the towns and oases of pre-Islamic Arabia, was

mainly practised by the women-folk, and especially by a class of

singing-girls (qaināt) attached to households of the upper classes or

employed at places of entertainment. The male musician (mughannī)

and instrumentalist (ʿālātī) were not so common, although one writer,

Ibn Mūsā al-Naṣībī (d. c. 860), wrote about them in a Book of Songs

(Kitāb al-aghānī).2 We know little of the nature of music in those days

but, as in ancient Mesopotamia, the art was associated with joy and

brightness, as etymology reveals. The word zahara meant ‘to shine

brightly’, hence that which produced ‘brightness’, a tambourine, was

called mizhar. The origin of musical instruments among the Arabs is

not unlike the story of Genesis iv. 21. According to Ibn Khurdādhbih,

Tūbal b. Lamak is to be credited with the invention of the tambourine

(duff) and the drum (ṭabl), whilst his sister Ḍilāl is claimed to have

originated the lyre or kithara (miʿzaf). Lamak himself was responsible

for the lute (ʿūd), and Lot’s people are given the credit of the pandore

(ṭunbūr). Likewise, the Kurds were thought to be the first to use the

recorder (? ṣaffāra) type of instrument, while upon the Persians was

conferred the honour of devising the reed-pipe (nāy), the double-pipe

(dūnāy), the shawm (surnāy), and the upper-chested harp (jank).3

In ‘Stony Arabia’, the kaʿba as a place of pilgrimage, and ‘Ukāẓ as

the home of the fair, were centres where musicians and poets con-

gregated to contest for supremacy in their arts, for even those

‘treasured poems’, the Muʿallaqāt, were sung as well as recited, just

1 L. W. King, Legends of Babylonia and Egypt in Relation to Hebrew Tradition

(London, 1918), p. 8. Cf. A. T. Clay, The Empire of the Amorites (New Haven, 1919),

passim.

2 Farmer, Sources of Arabian Music (Bearsden, 1940), p. 18. Reprint from the Records

of the Glasgow Bibliographical Society, xiii (1939).

3 Al-Mas‘ūdī, Prairies d’or, viii (Paris, 1861-77), pp. 89-90.

Page 477

424

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

as entire odes (qaṣā’id) were sung in the desert in modern times.1

Tradition avers that singing (ghinā’) arose from the caravan song (hudā’). Out of this were developed the lament (biqā’) and the elegy (nauh), until there was fashioned the secular song (naṣb).2 In ‘Happy Arabia’ we are told that two species of song were practised, the ḥimyārī and the ḥanafī.3 What distinction existed between them we are not told, but the former was evidently that of the Himyarites, whilst the latter, of more recent origin perhaps, may have been religious music.4 It is in ‘Desert Arabia’, thanks to the poets, that we get a fuller and more colourful picture of music. They tell of the joy when listening to the tavern singing-girl (dājina, qarīna), of the fascinating high trill (tudhrī), the swinging refrain (tarjī’), and the antiphon (jawāb). The instruments were the lyre or kithara (mi’zaf), certain kinds of lutes or pandores (muwattar, kirān) probably with skin ‘bellies’, the flute (quṣṣāba), the reed-pipe (mizmār), the percussion wand (qadīb), and tambourines (duff, mizhar).5

Judging by technical musical nomenclature, little alien influence had come to Arabia since the fall of the great Mesopotamian civilization. Where foreign influence did assert itself was at the perimeter, especially in those lands reached through two gaps in the desert to the north-west and north-east which, in the early years of the Christian era, were inhabited by two Arab peoples, the Nabaṭaeans and the Lakhmids, whose culture bore a fairly clear impress of Syria and Persia respectively. The former was a land which had, in the past, seduced Greece by the sounds of the sidonios nablaṣ (Hebrew nebel), the kinyra (Hebrew kinnōr), and the sambykē (Aramaic ṣabbekā), as well as the phoinix.6 If we can believe the Syrian Bar Ṣalībi (d. 1171), ‘musical tunes and melodies, with canons, stichera, and the rest came to the Greeks from outsiders’.7 Even Rome was caught by the Syrian anbūba and the tibiae sarranae.8 The persistence of the more ancient Mesopotamian culture in Syria certainly shows itself in musical instruments, as in the Syriac abbūba, ṭablā, pelāggā, qarnā, and zemmōra.

If Syria could influence Greece and Rome in music, peoples nearer home would certainly be affected more easily. The Nabaṭaean Arabs

1 J. L. Burckhardt, Notes on Bedouins and Wahābys, i (London, 1830), pp. 75, 253.

2 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 81-82.

4 Farmer, History of Arabian Music (London, 1929), pp. 2-3.

5 Ibid., chap. i, passim.

6 E. Pélagaud, ‘Syriens et Phrygiens’ in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 54–58.

7 A. Mingana, ‘Woodbrooke Studies’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, xi (1927), p. 145.

8 Pélagaud, loc. cit.

Page 478

THE CULTURAL BACKGROUND

425

at Petra, and later farther north as far as Palmyra, were a people of

some political and commercial standing in the early years of the

Christian era. That they used the Aramaic script is well testified. An

inscription at Palmyra tells of the kennārā (kinōrā),1 and Strabo men-

tions the joy of music at their festivals.2 Their successors, the Arab

Ghassanids (fifth-sixth centuries), who were phylarchs of the Byzan-

tines, were passionately fond of music. The Arab poets have praised

the Ghassanid courts, where singing-girls from Mecca, al-Ḥīra, and

Byzantium sang to the accompaniment of the barbaṭ or lute.3 It was

from this region, possibly, that the Arabs borrowed the reed-pipe

called zanbaq, whose very name reveals its origin, in that it was made

of sambucus wood.4 Indeed the Arabic harp-like instrument known

as the wannaj may have been a phonetic borrowing from the Syro-

Greek phoinix.5

The other gap in the desert to the north-east, the land of the Arab

Lakhmids of Mesopotamia, had been under Persian domination for

centuries, yet Persia, like other lands, had felt the pressure of ancient

Mesopotamian culture, as we have already seen.6 However, Persia

was now the fount of culture, although with her grotesque fable was

as persistent as with others on the origin of music which, according

to the Dabistān, began in the misty Mahābād days at the beginning of

time.7 Firdausī in his great epic, the Shāhnāma, dresses up the old

stories of the mythical kings and their prodigious exploits, although

much was claimed to have come from Pahlavī sources. The brilliant

courts of the kings are made resplendent with music (rūd) and singing

(sarwad), whilst the strings of the harp (chang), the pandore (tanbūr),

and lutes (barbaṭ, rubāb), and the breath of pipe and reed (rūyin nāy,

nāy) murmured their delightful notes. Of martial and processional

sounds were the strident blasts of horns and trumpets (karranāy,

shaipūr, būq), the thundering of drums and kettledrums (ṭabīra, kūṣ),

and the noise of a tintinnabulating throng (hindī darāy, zang, ṣinj).8

From Pahlavī sources we get safer news, in that we read of the

upper-chested harp (chang), the lower-chested one (vōn), the lute

(barbūṭ), the pandore (tambūr), the kannār, the shīshak, probably a

1 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 5.

2 xvi, iv. 27.

3 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 12.

4 J. Robson, Ancient Arabian Musical Instruments (Glasgow, 1938), pp. 16-17.

5 Al-Fīrūzābādī, Al-Qāmūs, s.v. Al-Mas‘ūdī, op. cit. viii, p. 91 (for zannaj read wannaj).

6 See above, pp. 250 ff.

7 The Dabistān. Translated by D. Shea and A. Troyer (Paris, 1843), p. 32.

8 For page references to the Shāhnāma see my chapter in A. U. Pope, A Survey of

Persian Art (London, 1938), p. 2786.

Page 479

426

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

near cousin of the Sanskrit ghoshaka, and the drums (tumbak, dum-balak), all of which can be recognized by Persian equivalents.1

Pahlavī contains many Semitic words, although kannār is the only one in the preceding list of instruments, yet the tabīra, karranāy, and shaipūr of Fīrdausī reveal a genuine Mesopotamian lineage. Many of these instruments are delineated on the Tāq-i Bustān reliefs (A.D. 590-628)3 and elsewhere.3

This was the flourishing period of the Sāsānid dynasty (224-642). It was Shāpūr I (d. 272) who is said to have introduced the lute into his land.4 Bahrām Gūr (d. 438) was famed for his musical talents, and his famous singing-girl, Āzāda, with her harp, is one of the commonest themes with the old Persian painters.5 Another king who was fond of music was Khusrau Parviz (d. 628), whose favoured singing-girl, Shīrīn, is extolled by Nidhāmī in his Khusrau va Shīrīn,6 and portrayed by the painters.7 Among the famed musicians of this time was Bārbad of Fars, whose melodies were being played in Merv in the tenth century.8 Another was Angisiyyā (cf. Nīgisā), who submitted melodies to measure.9

As for the scientific theory of music in Persia in those days nothing is known. The claims for the existence of treatises on music in pre-Islamic time,10 have been shown to be myths;11 there were no such books until long after Islam was established. Of practical theory there is some evidence, e.g. the dastānāt of Bārbad.12 We read of seven modes before the time of Bārbad,13 and of twelve and thirty during his time,14 as well as 360 melodies of his,15 all of which were possibly linked up with sidereal conceits (cf. the numbers), as in Mesopotamia of old.16

It was through al-Ḥīra, the capital of the Lakhmids, that Persian musical practices filtered into Arab lands. These people, like their

1 J. N. Unvalla, King Husrav and his Boy (Paris, 1921), pp. 27-29.

2 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii (Glasgow, 1939) pp. 69-85.

3 A. U. Pope, op. cit., pls. 208A, 230B, 233B.

4 Abu'l-Fidā, Historia anteislamica (Leipzig, 1831), pp. 82-83.

5 A. U. Pope, op. cit., pls. 664, 672, 679.

6 E. G. Browne, A Literary History of Persia, i (London, 1908), p. 17.

7 A. U. Pope, op. cit., pls. 898, 1042, 1476c.

8 W. Ouseley, The Oriental Geography of Ibn Haukal (London, 1800), p. 216.

9 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, iii (Paris, 1938), p. 548.

10 Albert de Lasalle, 'La Musique des Persans', La Chronique musicale (1864), p. 81.

11 Farmer, 'Ghosts: An Excursus on Arabic Musical Bibliographies' in Isis, xxxvi (1946), p. 125.

12 Al-Khwārizmī, Mafātīḥ al-‘ulūm (Leiden, 1895), p. 238.

13 Asiatick Researches, iii (5th ed., London, 1807), p. 63.

14 Burhān-i qāṭi‘ (Calcutta, 1818), s.v. ‘laḥn’.

15 A. de Biberstein Kazimirski, Menoutchehri, xl (Paris, 1886), pp. 13-14.

16 See p. 247.

Page 480

THE CULTURAL BACKGROUND

427

suzerains, were great lovers of music, and earned some fame in this

respect. Bahrām Gūr, as a prince, was sent to al-Ḥīra to be educated,

probably with this latter accomplishment in mind. It was certainly the

most important centre of Arabian culture in pre-Islamic times, and

it was from al-Ḥīra that Al-Naḍr b. al-Ḥārith (d. 624) introduced the

lute (‘ūd) and the more artistic song (ghinā’) into Mecca.1 Through

this corridor also came the Persian harp (chang, Arab. jank) and pan-

dore (ṭambūr, Arab. ṭunbūr), as well as the shawm (surnāy).

The part played by music in the peninsula as a whole during the

so-called ‘Days of Ignorance’, meaning ignorance of Islam, was little

different from its role in the earlier Semitic civilizations. If the Arabs

toiled for the Assyrians to the lilt of a song, they did likewise in dig-

ging the fosse at Al-Medīna at the dawn of Islam.2 If the temples of

Ishtar and Yahveh had their chants, so possibly had the shrines of the

Arabs.3 If the Hebrews likened music at a banquet to ‘a carbuncle set

in gold’, so could the pagan Arabs refer to it as ‘painters’ work set

off with gold’.4

THE RISE OF ISLAMIC MUSIC

At the birth of Islam in the Hijaz, in the first year of the Hijra or

‘Flight’, which we know as A.D. 622, a new spiritual world dawned

in which naught else mattered but Islam. At first all was austerity.

When Muḥammad had passed to greater glory (632), his ‘Com-

panions’ sought, like the Prophet, to keep the mind of man away from

what was termed the malāḥī or ‘forbidden pleasures’ which, as of old,

included ‘wine, woman, and song’. The Qur’ān had not contained a

word against music, but the purists of Islam began to collect ḥadīth or

‘sayings’ of Muḥammad which were supposed to condemn listening

to music, and these were used with considerable effect by the legists

(fuqahā’) to forbid any kind of music save that which was known to

have been tolerated by the Prophet. Eventually, the four great legal

schools of Islam, the Ḥanafī, the Mālikī, the Shāfi‘ī, and the Ḥanbalī,

decided, more or less, against ‘listening to music’ and a most in-

teresting controversial literature on its permissibility or otherwise

grew up.5

1 Al-Mas‘ūdī, op. cit. viii, pp. 93-94.

2 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 17.

3 R. A. Nicholson, A Literary History of the Arabs (London, 1914), p. 73.

4 C. J. Lyall, The Mufaddaliyyāt, ii (Oxford, 1918-21), p. 101.

5 Farmer, The Sources of Arabian Music = Records of the Glasgow Bibliographical

Society, xiii (1939), pp. 92-93; History of Arabian Music, pp. 20-36; Music: The Price-

less Jewel (Bearsden, 1942), pp. 1-27; J. Robson, Tracts on Listening to Music (London,

1938).

Page 481

428

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

As we have seen, music was in the hands of matrons and singing-

girls, although a few of the latter were suppressed under the earlier

of the Orthodox Caliphs (632-61). By the close of the reign of

'Uthmān (d. 646) the male musician and instrumentalist came to the

fore in the person of Ṭuwais (d. 710), who is claimed as the first male

musician under Islam.1 He made his name by imitating the Persian

melodies which could be heard on every hand from captives who had

been brought to the Hijaz as slaves. Indeed, so popular had this music

become, that Arab musicians found it necessary to become better

acquainted with this Iranian art in order to satisfy their clients. At the

same time, the Persian musicians, such as Nashīṭ, were compelled to

include Arabian melodies in their repertory so as to please their

patrons.2 Precisely the same thing happened in Persian lands, to which

thousands of Arabs had migrated at the conquest. Here, Arabian

music seems to have been as well known as the native art, and a cen-

tury later, when Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī went to Persia, he was able to

study both Persian and Arabian music there.3 The influence of

Persian music on the Arabian practical art was considerable.4

Under the Umayyad Caliphs (661-750) the capital was removed

from al-Medina to Damascus in Syria, where their courts, unlike

those of their predecessors, almost became conservatories of music.

Yazīd I (d. 683) was the earliest to have court minstrels, much to the

horror of the pious.5 He was 'appassioned of music'.6 Al-Walīd I

(d. 715) was another music-lover and the patron of the famous singers

and composers Ibn Suraij (d. c. 726) and Ma'bad (d. 743). The former

was the first to introduce the Persian lute into Mecca (c. 685), which

was an important event since its accordatura (taswiyya) and frets

(dasātīn) were the means of widening the gamut and generally con-

solidating Arabian music.7 Another great musician was Ibn Misjah

(d. c. 715) of al-Medina. He travelled in Syria, Persia, and elsewhere,

and picked up much that was new in these lands.8 His contemporary,

Ibn Muḥriz (d. c. 715), did very much the same.9 Other great artists

of the period were Al-Gharīd (d. 716),10 Ibn 'Ā'isha (d. c. 743),11 and

Mālik al-Ṭā'ī (d. c. 754).12

1 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, pp. 52-53; Encyclopaedia of Islam, iv, p. 283.

2 Farmer, History, p. 55.

3 Ibid., p. 116.

4 Ibid., pp. 48-49; Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, p. 750.

5 W. Muir, The Caliphate (Edinburgh, 1915), p. 314.

6 Al-Mas'ūdī, op. cit. v. 156.

7 Farmer, An Old Moorish Lute Tutor (Glasgow, 1933), pp. 26-27.

8 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, pp. 69-70; Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, p. 94.

9 Farmer, History, p. 70.

10 Ibid., p. 80.

11 Ibid., pp. 82-83.

12 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, p. 211.

Page 482

THE RISE OF ISLAMIC MUSIC

429

The early 'Abbāsid period (750-847) has well been called the 'Golden Age', and in music, as in art and letters, it certainly deserved this estimation. Although court demeanour reflected Persian custom on every side, in music, the old Arabian art, as established under the Umayyads, held complete sway. The greatest musician of his day, Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī (d. 804) was a protagonist of the indigenous music,1 as was his son Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī, perhaps the most famed musician in Islam.2 At the court of Al-Mahdī (d. 785), 'music refined the age',3 and 'no man had a finer voice than he'.4 As for Hārūn al-Rashīd (d. 809), the pages of The Arabian Nights reveal the wide horizon of his musical interests.5 Besides those mentioned, such great minstrels as Ibn Jāmi', Zalzal, 'Allawaya, and Yaḥyā al-Makkī were among those patronized.6 Under Ma'mūn (d. 833) there flourished the famous Prince Ibrāhīm b. al-Mahdī (d. 839), with a wondrous voice of three octaves.7 It was this prince who led the Persian romantic school in music in opposition to the Arabian classical school of Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī.8 The craze lasted for a century, but when its course was run, much of the older music, which was only preserved viva voce had disappeared.9 In Spain the Umayyad courts at Cordova vied with Baghdad in their patronage of art and science.10 'Alūn and Zarqūn 'Abbās b. al-Nasā'ī and Manṣūr al-Yahūdī.11 When the great Ziryāb appeared at the court of 'Abd al-Raḥmān II (d. 852) all who had preceded sank into oblivion, for 'there never was, either before or after him, a man . . . more admired'.12 Here the old Arabian school flourished in the form which Ibn Misjaḥ had created it, and Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī had confirmed it.

The second Baghdad period (847-945) saw the beginning of the decline of the Caliphate, and as the years crept on the great political empire of Islam gradually slipped away.13 The decay showed itself in music. Most of the caliphs still kept up huge musical establishments,

1 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, pp. 116-18.

2 Ibid., pp. 124-6.

3 W. Muir, op. cit., p. 467.

4 Ibn Khallikan, Biographical Dictionary, iii (Paris, London, 1843-71), p. 464.

5 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 94; The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights (Bearsden, 1945), p. 19.

6 Farmer, History, pp. 113-23.

7 Ibid., pp. 120-1.

8 Ibid., pp. 124-6.

9 Ibid., pp. 147-9. Barbier de Meynard, 'Ibrahim, fils de Mehdi', in Journal asiatique, [? vol.] (1869), pp. 201-342.

10 Farmer, History, p. 97.

11 Ibid., p. 131.

12 Ibn Khaldūn, Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque du Roi, xx (Paris, 1865), pp. 421-2; Al-Maqqarī, The History of the Mohammedan Dynasties in Spain, ii (London, 1840-3), pp. 116-21.

13 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 138.

Page 483

430

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

and some, Al-Muntaṣir (d. 862) and Al-Mu‘tazz (d. 869), were gifted

musicians,1 yet the brilliance was but reflected glory of the past. The

minstrels, Ibn Bāna, Abū Ḥashīsha, and others, were second-rate.2

The last period of the ‘Abbāsid Caliphate (945-1258) heralds the

rapid decay and the fall of Baghdad and all its greatness. It opens with

the political control of the caliphs by the Buwaihids (945) from

Dailam. Music still flourished, since the Dailamī amirs, together with

the caliphs, were as much addicted to all forms of the art and its con-

comitants as ever.3 With the coming of the Saljūqs (1037) from

Turkestan, who became virtual masters of the Caliphate, a fresh

cultural impingement began to show itself in Persia, Syria, and

Mesopotamia which, as we shall see, developed elsewhere. In Egypt

the Fāṭimid anti-Caliphate had been set up (909-1171), and its rulers,

with but one exception, patronized music, literature, and science

unstintedly.4 Al-Mustanṣir (d. 1094) even dared to say that his court

music was ‘pleasanter’ than listening to the cantillation of the caller

(mu’adhdhin) to prayer, while pictures of his dancing-girls, contrary

to Islamic custom, adorned his palaces.5 Then came the Ayyūbid

sultans (1169), bringing with them a Turkomanian influence which

made itself felt in the arts in general.6 This alien influence displayed

itself in music even more strongly under their successors, the Mam-

lūks (1252-1517), who were of Kurdish and Circassian breed, and

delighted in Turkomanian instruments such as the qūpūz (mandore).7

In North Africa, the Berber Almoravides became a political force

in 1056, and it is not unlikely that their dominion brought an indi-

genous music to the fore in Africa, and certainly we find that Spain

was manufacturing special Berber instruments.8 Yet although the

Berber Almoravides (1086) and Almohades (1130) became masters of

Arab Spain, it is unlikely that their musical preferences had much

sway over the accepted Arabian practice in the Iberian peninsula.

If any extraneous inducements were likely in this respect, it would be

from Christian Spain, and indeed this did show itself in Arab Anda-

lusia in one or two instruments, the kaitāra (guitarra) and bandair

(pandero). In the last Arab stronghold in Granada, the Naṣrid rulers

(1232-1492) attempted to maintain the grandeur of the past, ‘and for

a time revived the splendour and distinction of Moorish Spain’.9 We

1 Farmer, History, p. 140.

2 Ibid., pp. 157–9.

3 Ibid., pp. 179–80.

4 Ibid., pp. 189–92.

5 Ibid., p. 191.

6 Encyclopaedia of Islam, i, p. 223.

7 Al-Maqrīzī, Histoire des sultans Mamlouks, i/i (Paris, 1837), p. 36.

8 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. i, p. 59.

9 S. Lane-Poole, The Mohammedan Dynasties (London, 1894), p. 27.

Page 484

THE RISE OF ISLAMIC MUSIC

431

know from Ibn al-Khaṭīb (d. 1374) what an important position the

court singers held in his day. The end of Moorish Spain came in

1492 when Ferdinand and Isabella of Castile captured Granada.

In the east, where we last saw the Saljūqs in power, the situation

of the Caliphate was rapidly deteriorating. Chafing at the Saljūq bit,

the Caliph Al-Nāṣir (d. 1225) begged the Khwārizmī Shāh to ease

his condition, and in 1194 this was done. However, music was still

one of the glories of the palaces of the last of the caliphs, Al-Musta-

'ṣim (d. 1258); and the author of Al-Fakhrī tells us that this ruler

would spend many of his leisure hours in its enjoyment. His chief

court minstrel was the greatest musician of his age, Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd

al-Mu'min (d. 1294).1 In the year 1258 the Mughal hordes under

Hūlāgū put Baghdad to the sword, 'while the treasures, material,

literary, and scientific, accumulated during the centuries while

Baghdad was the metropolis of the vast empire of the 'Abbāsid Caliphs

were plundered or destroyed'.2 Thus closed one of the great and

splendid civilizations of history. It is true that Egypt and Syria

became, by virtue of the Arabic language, the pivot of the intellectual

life of Islam, but here it was but a shadow of the past. The Mamlūk

sultans maintained elaborate court music and splendid military

bands, but all this came to an end when the Ottoman Turks conquered

Egypt in the year 1517.3

After the fall of Baghdad, the axis of culture moved to the east,

when Persian, instead of Arabic, became the lingua franca. Here the

Mughal rulers, softened by Islam and Iran, became ardent and open-

handed patrons of the arts. The great musician, Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd al-

Mu'min, whose theoretical works on music dominated the Near and

Middle East for over 300 years, was patronized by the Juwainī family

in the service of Hūlāgū.4 Ibn Taghribardī tells us that the Il-Khān

Abū Sa'īd (d. 1335) himself 'cultivated music, played well on the

lute, and composed songs'.5 At the court of the Muẓaffarid ruler

Shāh Shujā' of Shīrāz (d. 1384) was the famed minstrel Yūsuf Shāh

and the great scholar and music theorist Al-Jurjānī (d. 1413).6 With

the Jalairids of Mesopotamia, Ḥusain (d. 1382) and Aḥmad (d. 1410),

music seems to have been of as much import as politics.7 Here,

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 191-2.

2 E. G. Browne, A Literary History of Persia, ii (London, 1920), p. 463.

3 S. Lane-Poole, A History of Egypt: The Middle Ages (London, 1901), vi, pp. 248-9, 318,

327-8; W. Muir, The Mameluke or Slave Dynasty of Egypt (London, 1896), pp. 58, 82, 88.

4 Farmer, in 'Preface' to R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, iii, pp. v-xiv.

5 A. U. Pope, A Survey of Persian Art (Oxford, 1938), p. 2796.

6 Ibid., p. 2797; R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. iii, pp. xii-xiii.

7 Journal asiatique, ser. iv (1845), v, p. 448.

Page 485

432

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

Riḍwān Shāh and ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī, the most famed musicians

of the day, flourished.1 When the conquering Tīmūr (d. 1405) appeared

on the horizon, the Persian minor dynasties vanished. Samarcand,

farther east, became the new cultural centre, and here ‘Abd al-

Qādir b. Ghaibī (d. 1435) found shelter.2 Yūsuf-i Andakānī,

who ‘had no equal in the seven climes’, was court minstrel to

Shāh Rukh (d. 1408).3 Amīr Shāhi was favoured by Bāysungur (d.

  1. because of his threefold accomplishments as musician, poet,

and painter.4 Even with the last of the Tīmūrids, Ḥusain Mīrzā

Bāyqarā (d. 1506), music was patronized without stint,5 and some of

its exponents, such as Qul-i Muḥammad, won celebrity far and wide.6

Under the Mughal Il-Khāns and the Tīmūrids, several new features

appeared in eastern Islamic music. Among them were such Chinese

instruments as the shidirghū, a long-necked lute, the yātūghān,

possibly a type of psaltery, the pīpa or lute, and other instruments.7

These probably infused fresh sound effects, something which may find

a parallel in painting; indeed the decorative feature in music, called

the naqsh, may also be traced in the rhetorical prose of the period,

and both may have been due to the same alien promptings.

Meanwhile the Ottoman Turks in Asia Minor had become the

rising Islamic power in the Near East, and their conquests in eastern

Europe, culminating in the capture of Constantinople (1453), gave

them a terrific prestige which was soon to carry them to the walls of

Vienna. Like other Islamic potentates, their sultans indulged in

music and song to their fullest measure, and musicians found their

courts a cornucopia. Here a son ‘Abd al-‘Azīz, and a grandson

Maḥmūd, of the great Persian musician ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī,

received the bounties of Muḥammad II (d. 1481) and Bāyazīd II

(d. 1512) respectively, whilst many Arabic and Persian works on the

theory of music were rendered into Turkish.8 Turkish influence on

the instrumental music of the Near East and Balkans was consider-

able, but that is outside our purview.

Islamic music was born and cradled in Arabia, yet, under Persian,

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 4-5.

2 Ibid., loc. cit.

4 Pope, op. cit., p. 2798.

5 The Bābur-nāma (London, 1921), pp. 272, 291-2.

6 E. G. Browne, Persian Literature under Tartar Domination (Cambridge, 1920),

p. 505.

7 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii (Glasgow, 1939), pp. 15-17,

pl. 10; Pope, op. cit. 633A, 778A.

8 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, p. 5; R. d’Erlanger, op. cit. iv, pp. 3, 261 ; Raouf Yekta

Bey, ‘La Musique turque’, in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la musique,

1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 2978-9.

Page 486

THE RISE OF ISLAMIC MUSIC

433

Syrian, and Greek tutelage, it became a universal art. Its extrinsic

character was changed when Ṣafī al-Dīn (d. 1294) introduced the

Khurasānī scale. Then, under Mughal and Turkoman pressure, came

other alien influences. These were followed, in the fourteenth century,

by a reversion to the plain Pythagorean scale in Persia, to be spread

elsewhere later. Finally came the adoption of the modern quarter-

tone (rub') scale in the seventeenth century, which made the final

break with the old Arabian-Persian-Syrian system of the ‘Golden

Age’ of Islam. Only in al-Andalus of the West was this latter pre-

served, and today in Morocco one may still hear sometimes, perhaps,

an echo of that music about which Shahrazad, although a Persian,

whispers so enchantingly in The Arabian Nights.

SECULAR MUSIC

We read in one of those delightful nocturnes in The Arabian

Nights: ‘To some people music is like food; to others like medicine;

to others like a fan.’1 This mention of music as ‘food’ has an esoteric

significance, as will be shown later. The remark ‘like medicine’ is also

strange, because the Oriental attitude towards music did not admit

of the ‘appreciation’ of music as we understand the term. Aesthetics,

the science of the beautiful, did not exist in Islamic conceptions. The

chief reason for this was that the Orient, as we have seen in ancient

Mesopotamia and Egypt, put great trust in the doctrine of tā’thīr

(influence) in music, a dogma called by the Greeks the ethos. This

belief, together with the accretion of anthropomorphism, reigned

supreme, and one has but to read The Arabian Nights to appreciate

its far-reaching effect. The delightful imagery in the ‘Song of the

Lute’,2 is not mere metaphor but anthropopathy. Music was part of

the macrocosmic system, and was accepted as such by many Islamic

philosophers, astronomers, mathematicians, and physicians.3 For

that reason the melodic modes (maqāmāt) and rhythmic modes

(īqā‘āt) were closely linked up with the universe.4 It was because

of this that the lute had ‘four strings, four sides, four parts, and

four tied places (frets)’,5 and that the dimensions of instruments

—which, incidentally, were given almost human attributes6—were

1 Arabian Nights (Lady Burton’s edition), ii (London, 1886-7), p. 463.

2 Ibid., v, p. 294.

3 Farmer, ‘The Influence of Music’ in Proceedings of the Musical Association, lii

(1929), pp. 89–124.

4 Farmer, An Old Moorish Lute Tutor, pp. 9-15.

5 Farmer, ‘An Anonymous English-Arabic Fragment’, in Islamic Culture, xviii

(Hyderabad, 1944), p. 202.

6 Farmer, The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights (Bearsden, 1945), p. 13.

B 8608

F f

Page 487

434

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

subject to mathematical formulas.1 In addition, all was related to,

and conditioned by, cosmic things: the humours, the elements, the

seasons, the winds, the planets, the zodiac, and so on.2 The hearing

of special kinds of music at particular times of the day and month,

under certain other conditions, became a part of therapeutics. It was

used in hospitals, not so much for its soothing effect, but because of

its geometrical proportion together with its astrological significance.3

Within such principles there could have been no room for aesthetics.

What is of greater interest is the more universal approval of music

as the story-teller in The Arabian Nights puts it, likening the art to

'a fan [on a sulty day]'. When a child was born into Islam the open-

ing lines of the call to prayer (adhān) was chanted in its ear, whilst

the neighbouring matrons assembled with their tambourines (dufūf)

to herald joy. At the celebrations of circumcision there was further

music and entertainment. Marriage occasioned an even greater dis-

play, since the procession had its shawms (zumūr) and drums (ṭubūl)

in noisy service, while hired female musicians (mughanniyāt) per-

formed less strident music in the courtyard. Even at the bier, the

wailing (wilwāl) of the mourning women (naddābāt) and the thud of

their tambourines, was followed by the chanting of the Qur'ān.

Thus, between the cradle and the grave, music was ever present in

Islam. All the great religious festivals encouraged public music, for the

cry was 'Gladden thine heart, drum thine drum, and pipe thine

pipe'.4 Military and processional music was cultivated on a grandiose

scale in the shape of trumpets (anfār), horns (būqāt), shawms (zumūr),

drums (ṭubūl), kettledrums (naqqārāt), and cymbals (kasāt).5 Its per-

formance of a divertimento (nauba) at certain prescribed hours of the

day must have beckoned the crowd. In addition there was the attrac-

tion of the singing-girls (qaināt) in the taverns, against which the

pious raved in wrath, and the less scandalous story-teller (rāwī) and

violist (rabābī) in the coffee-houses. The household in general found

the matrons indulging in singing to the rhythm of the tambourine.

The music of the Islamic folk was little different then from what

it is today. The toil song, a relic from the cradle of humanity, was

practised by the boatman, the sailor, the porter, the weaver, the

gleaner, and the rest,6 for its lilt and measure not only softened the

1 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii, pp. 90-98.

2 F. Dieterici, Die Propaedeutik der Araber (Berlin, 1865), pp. 141-6.

3 Farmer, Sa'adyah Gaon on the Influence of Music (London, 1943), p. 6; E. Werner

and I. Sonne, 'The Philosophy and Theory of Music in Judaeo-Arabic Literature',

Hebrew Union College Annual, xvi (1941), pp. 292-88.

4 Arabian Nights, ii, p. 413.

5 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 217-22.

6 Dieterici, op. cit., p. 103.

Page 488

SECULAR MUSIC

435

sweat of toil but ordered it rhythmically. Then there was domestic music: the lullaby, the children's ditties, the bridal song, and the elegy.1 Nor was this simple homely art confined to the folk. The Caliph Hārūn delighted in listening to his minstrels repeating the songs of the people, as we know from the reception he gave Ibn Jāmi‘ when he sang the song of the Yemenite negress, and Abū Ṣadaqa when he chanted the ditties of sailors and masons.2

With the middle and upper classes, music assumed a far different character, much of it being determined by the modes and tastes set by courtly procedure. The caliphs, nobility, and rich merchants kept musical establishments in which highly skilled singing-girls were part of the household.3 They usually came from music schools established specially for their training, and fabulous sums were sometimes paid for them,4 the price being determined by both physical and musical charms, although the Persian poet Sa‘dī said ‘a sweet voice is better than a beautiful face’.5 They were usually given an excellent education.6 The male musicians and those who were specifically instrumentalists, were usually freedmen (mawālī) of foreign extraction, mainly Persian, and the demand for them at the court and elsewhere was inordinate, while the gold and other gifts showered on them almost passes credence.7 Certainly the concerts given at court, which were staged with great lavishness, dwarfs anything else in the history of music.8 In Umayyad days these musicians, both male and female, were quite unrestrained in their public performances at court or elsewhere,9 but later a curtain shut them off from the audience, this provision satisfying the consciences of the auditors somewhat, in that if they heard this ‘forbidden pleasure’ (milhā, pl. malāhī), at least they did not see it.10 The truth was that in spite of all the condemnation of music by the puritans, ways and means were found, sometimes with the most delightful casuistry, to escape censure.11

At concerts in Umayyad days (661–750) ‘the utmost propriety was observed’, and the slightest breach of decorum was reproved by the stroke of a stick.12 The earliest minstrel, Ṭuwais, used to walk back-

1 See Bibliography.

2 Al-Iṣfahānī, Kitāb al-aghānī (Bulaq, 1869), vi, p. 86; xxi, p. 104; J. Ribera, Music in Ancient Arabia and Spain (London, 1929), p. 61.

3 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 67.

4 Ibid., pp. 86–87, 102, 132–6.

5 Gulistan, iii. 28.

6 Farmer, The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights, pp. 18–22.

7 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, pp. 81, 100, 112–17, 124–6.

8 Ibid., pp. 65–77, 99–112, 145–56, 194–211.

9 Ibid., pp. 67–68.

10 Ibid., pp. 102–4.

11 Farmer, Music: The Priceless Jewel (Bearsden, 1942), p. 13.

12 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 55.

Page 489

436

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

wards and forwards along the lines of his audience.1 Al-Gharīd, before he gave a recital, would explain to his audience the type of music he was about to perform, adding some little history of the composer and author, together with something about its first performance and performers. The mannerisms of these musicians are not without interest. Yazīd Haurā’ was given to attitudinizing and gesticulating while performing, which may have had an emotional or rhythmical effect; these affectations impressed the great Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī, who made his singing-girls copy every movement of this artist.2 The famous Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī usually began his own songs on a high note with a terrific sforzando, hence his nickname al-malsū‘ (‘stung by a scorpion’).3 Ziryāb, in Muslim Spain, practised some novel methods in teaching; for instance, bad articulation was remedied by the insertion of a piece of wood in the pupil’s mouth so as to keep the jaws apart; it was kept there night and day until cure was effected.4

Methods of composition seem to us just as odd. Some composers, when in an inventive mood, took a rhythmic wand (qadīb) to beat out a known rhythm, and then gave utterance to what was called an ‘improvised song’ (ghinā’ murtaǧal).5 Ma‘bad, the spirit moving him to compose, would leap into a saddle and beat on the pommel with his wand in his chosen rhythm until his melody took definite shape.6 Ibn Suraij would put on a robe garnished with jingling grelots which, when he swayed in rhythm, helped him to fashion a new melody.7 When Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī was asked how he composed he said that the first thing he did was to banish all thoughts of mundane affairs. This enabled him to lift his thoughts to the requisite emotional plane; his creative self emerged only when he could no longer see or hear anything external. When this sensation or transcendence was reached, he visualized his rhythm, and within its framework, his tonal images took shape.8 Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī, his son Isḥāq, and Ziryāb claimed to have been taught melodies by the devil and genii.9 The latter, when the jinn had been prompting him in his sleep, would jump out of bed, call his singing-girls, and get them to memorize the music while it was still fresh in his mind.10

In early days, the more solemn rhythms (thaqāl) were preferred to

1 Farmer, ‘The Minstrels of the Golden Age of Islam’, Islamic Culture, xvii (1943), p. 272.

3 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. iii, p. 70.

5 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. v, p. 70.

2 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. i, p. 21.

4 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. ii, p. 121.

6 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 47.

7 R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, p. 10.

9 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. v, p. 34.

10 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. ii, pp. 116-21.

Farmer, The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights, p. 20.

Page 490

SECULAR

MUSIC

437

the festive rhythms (ramal, hazaj, mākhūrī). Under the later ‘Abbāsid régime, the latter became very popular. Ḥakam al-Wādī, censured for pandering to the public taste by composing and singing in the lighter vein, said: ‘For thirty years I have sung in the thaqīl rhythm and have hardly gained a living, yet in three years of singing in the hazaj rhythm I have earned more money than thou hast ever seen.’1 That melodies and rhythms should be in conformity with the sentiment of the words was stressed by Ibn ‘Abd Rabbihi (d. 940), the Ikhwān al-Ṣafā’ (c. 961), and Ibn Sīda (d. 1066), and it is this which accounted for preferences in lighter music. We are told, however, that there were kinds of music designed for joy and sorrow, music for the tavern and flowing bowl, music for lovers and for mourners, music for the description of scenes as widely asunder as the hushed scented garden and the moving chase. Indeed, Ishāq al-Mauṣilī spoke of a composition of his in which he portrayed a game of ball with a stick, complete with the getting of a goal at the end.2 That is real programme music. Only those who have heard music in the Near and Middle East can possibly appreciate the wide dissimilarity of reaction to music between the Orient and the Occident.3 The rending of garments, and similar sudden, unpremeditated, and often violent acts, under music’s influence, are commonplaces in Arabic literature. Swooning is the general result of the ‘killing charm’ of music, as we read in The Arabian Nights,4 although death itself has been recorded several times.5

The sums awarded to musicians, as recorded in the annals, are absurdly large if judged by our standards. The same may be said of the numbers of compositions said to be theirs or in their repertories. Badhl, a famous songstress, is alleged to have known 30,000 songs,6 and yet, prodigious as this may seem, there are still people who know the Qur’ān by heart. More modest was the accomplishment of ‘Uraib, another songstress, who claimed 21,000, while Ziryāb in Spain knew only 10,000.7 The compositions of individual musicians do not ‘hit’ so high a mark, to use an Arabism, although Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī boasted of 900 works.8 As with us in the West, certain songs became famous, such as the Seven Fortresses of Ma‘bad,9 the Seven Songs of Ibn Suraij,10 the Hundred Chosen Songs edited by Ibn Jāmi‘,11 the song called ‘Three Maidens’, the words being attributed to

1 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, p. 111.

2 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. v, p. 97.

3 Farmer, The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights, pp. 11-12.

4 Ibid., loc. cit.

5 Arabian Nights, ii, 439.

6 Farmer, History, p. 134.

7 Ibid., pp. 130, 133.

8 Ibid., p. 117.

9 Ibid., p. 82.

10 Ibid., p. 80.

11 Farmer, Sources, p. 15.

Page 491

438

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

the Caliph Hārūn,1 and the ‘Zayānib’ of Yūnus al-Kātib.2 Complete song collections existed in profusion,3 as well as biographies of singers, instrumentalists, and composers,4 together with popular story-books about music.5 It is humbling to scan the pages of the Great Book of Songs (Kitāb al-aghānī al-kabīr) by Al-Iṣfahānī (d. 967), which took fifty years to compile, consisting of twenty-one volumes, containing nearly 2,000,000 words, dealing with the history of Arabian music and song up to the tenth century, and to compare it with similar Occidental achievement during the same period.

RELIGIOUS MUSIC

That music played its part in religious ceremonial in ancient Arabia seems clear enough. St. Nilus speaks of the pagan Arabs chanting when encircling a stone.6 Noeldeke suggested that this was similar to the Islamic tahlīl, a musical utterance which belonged to moon worship; it was used with the talbiyya, which is claimed to have been indulged in by Adam and Noah.7 Epiphanius avers that Dhu’l-Shāra, a god of the Nabaṭaeans, was worshipped on his birthday ‘with hymns’. Indeed Hisham b. al-Kalbī tells us in his Book of Idols that ‘the melodies of mankind’ were due to the god named Al-‘Uqayṣir. When Islam came to Arabia, Muḥammad cried anathema upon much of this, but from the Atlantic to the Oxus music and magic were closely connected. What was turned directly into Islamic practice were the tahlīl and talbiyya. Similarly, the pagan songs during the pilgrimage (hajj) were given a new character and even allowed to be accompanied by fife (shāhīn) and drum (ṭabl).8 Islam strove to discredit the dance (raqs), and the literature in its condemnation is not inconsiderable.9 Ibn Taimiyya (d. 1328) scorned it as ‘proud walking upon the earth’,10 yet it was never eradicated. Today, among those Arabs who are far distant from the Occidentalized towns, one may still hear and see the choral dance which, while outwardly secular, still retains its religious mien. As we shall see later, the religious dance still exists.

Strictly speaking, however, Islam has no religious music in our

1 Ibn al-‘Arabī, Al-futūḥāt, ii (Cairo, A.H. 1329), p. 612.

2 Farmer, History, p. 80.

3 Ibid., pp. 88–89.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid., pp. 90–93.

6 Migne, Patrologia latina, lxxi, p. 612.

7 Encyclopaedia of Islam, i, p. 965; iv, p. 640. Al-Kalbī, The Book of Idols (Princeton, 1952), p. 33.

8 Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1901), pp. 220–1.

9 Farmer, Sources of Arabian Music, p. 90.

10 Sirajul Haq, ‘Samā’ and Raqs’, in Islamic Culture, xviii (1944), pp. 111–30.

Page 492

RELIGIOUS MUSIC

439

normal sense of the term, since there is no service in the Muslim

mosque comparable to that in the Christian church. Yet music in

praise of Allāh has always found a place both inside and outside

the Muslim places of worship, e.g. in the ‘reading’ (qirāʾa) of the

Qurʾān, the cantillation (talḥīn) of the call to prayer (adhān), the

‘listening to music’ (al-samāʿ) of the Ṣūfī and Darwīsh fraternities,

and the simple religious chants of the folk. The Qurʾān lent itself to

cantillation because of its prosodic structure; much of it consists of

rhymed prose (sajʿ), the assonance of which tempted the voice to use

modulated sound in ‘reading’. Further, there was the ḥadīth which

said, ‘Allāh listens more intently to a man with a beautiful voice

reading the Qurʾān than does the owner of a singing-girl to her

voice’.1 In this wise the cantillation of the Qurʾān became a necessity,

and Ibn Qutaiba (d. 889) tells us that the earliest of these chanters

who used melodies (alḥān) was ‘Ubaidallāh b. Abī Bakr (fl. 669),

though he informs us that this early cantillation was dirge-like and

quite different from ordinary melody (laḥn) in singing (ghināʾ).2 This

distinction seems to have been a fiction created by the legists who, in

their opposition to music, looked upon this singing as improper

(makrūh),3 and so discriminated between ‘cantillation’ (taghbīr =

‘raising [the voice]’)4 and singing (ghināʾ).5 By the ninth century,

however, even the melodies of popular ballads were being used in

the cantillation of the Qurʾān.6 Despite the violent opposition of the

purists to all music, the cantillation of the Qurʾān became one of its

supreme religious and cultural accomplishments. While the prosodic

vocalization and punctuation are strictly governed by rules laid down

later by Ibn al-Jazarī (d. 1429),7 the cantillation itself was not confined

to any fixed melodic contour, and so, from the shores of Morocco

to the Oxus, one may hear this cantillation today in almost as many

patterns as there are mosques.8

The ‘call to prayer’ (adhān = ‘announcement’) was instituted in

the first or second year of the Hijra (622-4) as a means of summoning

the faithful to their religious duties. At first it was but a simple

announcement in the streets,9 and it was thus that Bilāl, the first

1 Al-Ghazālī, Iḥyāʾ ‘ulūm al-dīn, ii (Cairo, A.H. 1326), p. 185.

2 Ibn Coteiba's Handbook der Geschichte (Göttingen, 1850), p. 265.

3 Farmer, History of Arabian Music, pp. 22-23.

4 Or taʾbīr = ‘narration’.

5 Notices et extraits des manuscrits, xx (Paris, 1865), p. 419.

6 Ibn Coteiba's Handbook der Gesch.chte, loc. cit.

7 Al-Suyūṭī, Itqān, i (Cairo, A.H. 1278), p. 96.

8 For a modern plain example see E. W. Lane, Modern Egyptians (London, 1860),

p. 376. A more ornate specimen has been recorded on H.M.V. 7-212104-5.

9 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, p. 373.

Page 493

440

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

'caller' or muezzin (mu'adhdhin), performed it.1 Shortly after this

we find it being called from the minaret of the mosque in a similar

way to the cantillation of the Qur'ān as a dirge-like chant, a character

which persisted until the tenth century in Egypt, as Al-Muqaddasī

(d. 946) tells us.2 Then, as with the 'reading' of the Qur'ān, melody

proper, indistinguishable from ordinary singing (ghinā'), came into

general use; the performance of this was known by the purely secular

term taṭrīb,3 although we read at Fars in Persia that the 'call' was

made without taṭrīb.4 In the Ḥijāz the office of muezzin was at first

hereditary,5 but before long the duties became so onerous that

several muezzins were to be found in each mosque, and by the ninth

and tenth centuries, these were taking it in turns to make the 'call',6

while within the mosque itself they later joined in chorus when

chanting the 'second call' (iqāma).7 As with the cantillation of the

Qur'ān, the 'call' is still to be heard in totally different styles, from

the plain, ingenuous, unaffected chant,8 to highly festooned colora-

tura.9

The Ṣūfī and Darwīsh conception of music as an aid or approach

to religion is of the highest importance since they reveal how inti-

mately their ideals are connected with ancient beliefs,10 although on a

higher and more rationalized plane. Ibn Zaila (d. 1048) says: 'Sound

produces an influence in the soul in two ways: one on account of its

musical structure [i.e. its physical structure], and the other because of

its similarity to the soul [i.e. its spiritual structure].'11 Ṣūfī disciples,

such as the Persian Al-Hujwīrī (eleventh century) and Al-Ghazālī

(d. 1111), divide people influenced by music into two classes—those

who hear the material sound, and those who apprehend its spiritual

meaning. The latter, in Ṣūfī doctrine, do not hear notes or beats,

melodies or rhythms, but music per se. Al-Hujwīrī quotes the saying

of the Prophet, 'O Allāh, let us see things as they are', and listening

to music could alone accomplish that, since 'right audition consists

1 Ibn Sa'd, Biographien Muhammeds, iii, i (Leiden, 1904), p. 165.

2 Bibliotheca geographorum arabicorum, iii (Leiden, 1877), p. 205.

3 Ibid. iii, p. 327.

4 Ibn Jubair (Gibb Memorial Series), v (Leiden, 1907), p. 194. 5 Ibid. iii, p. 439.

6 Bibliotheca geographorum arabicorum, vii (Leiden, 1892), p. 111.

7 Ibid. iii, p. 327.

8 E. W. Lane, op. cit., pp. 374–5; Jules Rouanet, 'La Musique arabe' in Lavignac and

La Laurencie, Encyclopédie, 1re partie, v, pp. 2818–19; J. Parisot, Rapport sur une mission

scientifique en Turquie d'Asie (Paris, 1889), p. 204.

9 G. A. Villoteau, La Description de l'Égypte: état moderne, i (Paris, 1809–26), pp. 705–

6; J. Parisot, op. cit., p. 103. A slightly ornamented version is recorded in The History

of Music in Sound, i, side 16.

10 See above, pp. 231, 258.

11 British Museum MS. Or. 2361, f. 220v.

Page 494

RELIGIOUS MUSIC

441

of hearing everything as it is in quality and predicament'.1 Thus Ṣūfī teaching reveals to us the meaning of music in almost the Schopenhauerian sense that it is the eternal will itself.2 The Arab mystic, Abū Sa‘īd b. al-‘Arabī (d. 952), believed that ultimate truth could be apprehended only through divine ecstasy, and ‘ecstasy is lifting the curtain and witnessing the Watcher [Allāh]’. The most potent means to the attainment of ecstasy is ‘listening to music’, for as Dhu’ l-Nūn, the Egyptian mystic has said, we have in this ‘listening’ a power that ‘creates a divine influence which stirs the heart to seek Allāh’, and leads one ‘to find the existence of the Truth beside the Veil’, as Abu’ l-Ḥusain al-Darrāj has testified.3

It was from such beliefs and practices, although far less spiritual, that sprang the numerous Darwīsh orders, the Mevlevi (Mawlawiyya), the Aïssaoua (‘Isawiyya), and others, with whom music and dancing are used to create an hypnosis for the attainment of religious sublimation. The Mevlevi order, founded at Konia by Jalāl al-Dīn al-Rūmī (d. 1273), better known as the ‘dancing darwīshes’, has a most interesting ceremonial dance of thirteen sections which have been described by Helmut Ritter.4 A somewhat analogous rite from Upper Egypt, consisting of seven sections, has been recorded by Victor Loret.5 The Aïssaoua fraternity was founded in Morocco by Muḥammad b. ‘Īsā (d. 1524), hence its name, but since then it has spread to other parts of the Maghrib and Egypt.6 It still exists.7

Yet the religious music of Islam does not begin and end in pious edifices or institutions, since in every Muslim land the religious chant has been an integral part of social life. Just as the Calvinists were wont to indulge in psalm-singing as a secular pleasure, so the Muslims in their festivals found social pleasure in the religious chant. Wherever one looks in Islamic lands, the universality of hymns (nashā’id) and cantillation (taḥīn) is apparent. Indeed, in some instances, they have been a part of education, and this has prevailed in spite of the fact that there has always been a powerful group of

1 Al-Hujwīrī, Kashf al-ḥumūm (London, 1911), p. 403.

2 Farmer, The Influence of Music: From Arabic Sources, p. 91.

3 D. B. Macdonald, ‘Emotional Religion in Islam’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1901), p. 719.

4 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (Berlin, 1933), pp. 28–40, pls. 5–23; Dorothy Walker, ‘Akhar al-darāwīsh al-maulawiyya’, in Al-mustami‘ al-‘arabī, viii/21 (Arabic Listener), pp. 18–19.

5 Mémoires . . . de la mission archéologique française au Caire, i (Paris, 1889), pp. 329–63.

6 Encyclopaedia of Islam, ii, pp. 527–8.

7 E. W. Lane, op. cit., pp. 460–63; Rouanet, op. cit., pp. 2830–1; R. d’Erlanger, Mélodies tunisiennes (Paris, 1937), pp. 18–20.

Page 495

442

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

legists who strenuously opposed music in any form, if not always as something sinful (haram), at least as a diversion which was considered unpraise-worthy (makrūk).1

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

The Arabs admitted that ‘with the exception of the Persians and Byzantines, no people had a greater liking for musical instruments’ than themselves.2 Certainly no other people ever wrote so enthusiastically about them. Many of the Arabic and Persian writers on music from Al-Fārābī (d. c. 950) to ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaïbī (d. 1435), fully describe the instruments of their day. In Muslim Spain, where Seville was the centre of the instrument-making trade, there were ‘works on the art of making instruments common amongst us’, says Ibn Sa‘īd al-Maghribī (d. c. 1286).3

One of the earliest of the instruments of the Arabs was the qadīb or rhythmic wand, whose tick-tick (taqtaqa) the Prophet disliked.4 Hand-clapping was called tasfīq, hence musāfiq or clappers,5 which to the Syrian Arabs were the shuqaifāt;6 the Persians called them the chārpāra or chālpāra. Small finger cymbals were the Arabic kā-sāt, which the Syrians termed sajjāt. Cymbals proper, when plate-shaped, were the sunūj, but if bowl-shaped were the ku‘ūs or kāsāt.7 Musical glasses (harmonica) called tusūt, were known to Ibn Khaldūn (d. 1406), but the instrument was played with sticks.8 The Persian ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaïbī speaks of saz-i tā-sāt (musical cups) and sāz-i kā-sāt (musical bowls), as well as the sāz-i alwāh-i fūlad (instrument of slabs of steel), i.e. the glockenspiel.9 We first read of a metallophone in Ibn Sīnā and Ibn Zaila in the eleventh century, who term it the ṣanj ṣinī (Chinese ṣanj).10

The generic name for a drum was the Arabic tabl, which equated with the Persian duhul, and the Turkish dāwūl. In the specific sense it was a cylindrical drum with two heads. A waisted drum was the kūba.11 Among single-headed drums was the small vase-shaped

1 Arabian Nights, vi, p. 59. 2 Al-Mas‘ūdī, op. cit. viii, p. 93.

3 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. i pp. 42, 58–59, 197.

4 Madrid MS. 603 (Arabic), fo. 79.

5 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii, pp. 28–29.

6 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, p. 196; Farmer, Sources, frontispiece; A. Lane, Early Islamic Pottery (London, 1948), pl. 49A.

7 T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, op. cit., fig. 91.

8 Notices et extraits des manuscrits, xvii (1858), p. 354; xix (1865), p. 412.

9 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, ff. 78, 81.

10 R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, ii, p. 234.

11 Farmer, Studies, ii, fig. 13; A. Pavlovskij, ‘Décoration des plafonds de la Chapelle Palatine’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift, ii (1893), p. 384; Pope, op. cit., pl. 603.

Page 496

durraij,1 while a larger type was the Berber agwal, and the Arabian darbakka or darbūka, which was identical with the Persian tunbūk.2

Kettledrums ranged from tiny nuqairāt, through medium-sized naqqārāt equating with the Turkish quddūm, to the larger kūsāt, and the monster Mughal kuwargā or kūrgā.

Single kettledrums were the ṭabl shāmī, qaṣ‘a, and ṭabli bāz.3

Tambourines were plentiful. Duff was the generic term for both the circular and rectangular kind; among the former was the mizhar, while with ‘snares’ across the skin it was the ghirbāl because of its likeness to a ‘sieve’. In Muslim Spain the Christian pandero (bandair) was borrowed.

It was something like the preceding but when rings and sonnettes were added it was called the dā’ira, or with jingling metal plates the ṭarr.4

Among horns and trumpets the Arabic būq was generic for both, although the word was used particularly for the conical tube types, while the cylindrical tube was called nafīr.

The Persian karnā was extremely long and had the ‘bell’ turned back into an ‘S’ shape.5 Turks and Turkomans had the būrū and būrghū.

The woodwind were covered by the term mizmār in Arabic and nai in Persian, but the latter distinguished the flute and reedpipe as the nay-i safīd (white nai) and the nay-i siyāh (black nai).

The Arabs used mizmār or zamr specifically for the reedpipe, while they called the flute the quṣṣāba.

Smaller flutes were the Arabic shabbāba, the Persian pīsha, and the Berber juwāq, the latter being the puzzling instrument written humāqī by a careless copyist of Al-Maqqarī.

The panpipes had the name shu‘aibiyya in Egypt, but elsewhere the more classical term mūsīqāl was used, hence the Turkish mithqāl.6

The balāban of the Persian and Turkoman was a cylindrical reed-pipe, while the conical shawm was the Persian surnā, the Arabic surnāy, and the Turkish zurnā.7

Other varieties were the ghaiṭa, nāy zunāmī (vulg. zullāmī), and the būq [zamrī].

Double reedpipes, such as the Persian dūnāy, the ‘Iraqian zammāra, the Maghribian maqrūn, and the Turkī qōshnāy, belonged to the folk, as did the ‘drone’ type of the tibiae pares, as exemplified in the arghūl.8

An instrument of Chinese provenance

1 J. Robson, op. cit., pp. 14–15.

2 Farmer, Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights, p. 36.

3 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 215–17; Pope, op. cit., pl. 706; Farmer, Minstrelsy, pl. 11.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 73–75; Farmer, Minstrelsy, pls. 1, 9.

5 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 42–44; Farmer, Turkish Instruments of Music in the Seventeenth Century (Glasgow, 1937), pp. 28–31, 47; Kinsky, op. cit., p. 43, figs, 1, 3; T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, op. cit., fig. 91; Ars Asiatica, xiii (Paris, 1929), pl. lv.

6 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 541–2; Farmer, Studies, i, pp. 65–67; Minstrelsy, pls. 7, 8, 12.

7 Farmer, Turkish Instruments, pp. 23–27.

8 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 539–41.

Page 497

444

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

was the mouth-organ of free reeds called the mushtak in Sāsānid days, and it was still thriving under the Mughals as the chubchīq.1 That the Arabs knew of and constructed pneumatic and hydraulic organs we know from the Mūrisṭus treatises, but both the former and the hydraulus were early types. Their hydraulic organs were master-pieces of mechanism, based mainly on the appliances of Philo, Hero, and Archimedes. Their hydraulus was certainly of a type anterior to Hero and Vitruvius.2 The portative was known in Persia in the fifteenth century.3

It is in chordophones that Islamic peoples gained world-wide fame. The upper-chested harp or chang was the more favoured in Persia; it was the Arabic jank, sometimes called ṣanj. Al-Fārābī (d. c. 950) mentions various methods of stringing and accordatura, one with fifteen strings tuned diatonically from G to g1, while another with twenty-five strings was tuned chromatically from G to g1.4 The Persian Kanz al-tuhaf (fourteenth century) gives twenty-four strings tuned diatonically from c to c11, while the Jāmi‘ al-alḥān (1435) describes the chang with thirty-five strings tuned enharmonically for two octaves.5 It appears in both Arabian and Persian art.6 Persia had another harp which had a wooden face to the sound-chest, instead of a parchment face as in the chang; it was called the agri, but was tuned similarly to the chang.7 In Egypt was produced another type called the jank miṣrī which had a wooden sound-board placed on one side of the strings for greater resonance.8 Off the beaten track, in the Yemen and the Hijaz, the more primitive lyre or kithara (?) known as the mi‘zaf was still favoured in the tenth century. In Baghdad it was laughed at as a ‘rat trap’,9 although Al-Fārābī recognized it.10

The psaltery was attributed to Al-Fārābī,11 but the instrument is not mentioned by him under its millennium-old name of qānūn. Nor do Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037) or Ibn Zaila (d. 1048) mention it, yet it is figured in its trapezoidal form in the tenth-century Syriac lexicons.12

1 Farmer, Studies, ii, pp. 9-10.

2 Farmer, The Organ of the Ancients: From Eastern Sources (London, 1931), passim.

3 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 80.

4 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i (Paris, 1930), pp. 286-94.

5 King's College (Cambridge) Persian MS. 211, ff. 21v-22.

6 A. U. Pope, op. cit., pls. 646A, 652, 727B, 1300A-B, 1808, 1330A, 1353B; see pl. 13 (c).

7 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 78.

8 Glasgow University MS. Bi 22-z. 18, fo. 145.

9 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 528-30.

10 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, p. 286.

11 Ibn Khallikān, op. cit. iii, p. 309.

12 R. Payne Smith, Thesaurus Syriacus (Oxford, 1891), p. 3613.

Page 498

INSTRUMENTS OF MUSIC

445

As the qānūn it was known in Muslim Spain in the eleventh century,1 and in the fourteenth century it was mounted with sixty-four

strings, tuned tricordally, in Persia,2 the latter being of twisted copper.3 Ṣafī al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Mu’min (d. 1294) invented a rectangular

psaltery of sixty-four strings called the nuzha.4 The names ṣantūr, sinṭīr, and such like variants, were given the dulcimer, possibly from

the Aramaic.5 Ibn Khaldūn (d. 1406) mentions it in the Maghrib,6 but it fell into disuse generally among the Arabs, although much

favoured in Persia. See pl. 13 (b).

Bowed instruments can only be definitely traced to the tenth century, when Al-Fārābī clearly mentions a rabāb being bowed.7 The

rebec of Islamic peoples had many forms. The pear-shaped instrument was possibly the one which Al-Fārābī described, showing it

to be mounted with from one to four strings.8 The boat-shaped type was a survival of the sound-chest of the old barbiton,9 and this

may have been the rabāb of Muslim Spain praised by Yaḥyā b. Hudhail (d. 995) and Ibn Ḥazm (d. 1064).10 For centuries it had but

two strings tuned a fifth apart, as was the rubèba of Jerome of Mora- via (thirteenth century).11 The hemispherical-chested viol, with a long

iron foot, has been more favoured in the Middle East; it is generally called the kamāncha (Ar. kamānja), and may have been the type to

which Ibn al-Faqīh referred in 902–3 when speaking of its use by the Copts of Egypt and the people of Sind;12 it was usually found with

two strings, tuned a fourth apart. A more elaborate instrument was the ghīchak of Persia and beyond; it had a larger sound-chest than

the kamāncha, and had eight sympathetic strings in addition.13 The shallow, rectangular sound-chest type, has long been a folk instrument;

it is the one which the ancient poets may have used to accompany

1 Shihāb al-Dīn, Safinat al-mulk (Cairo, 1891), p. 473.

2 Kings College (Cambridge) Persian MS. 211, ff. 23r–23v.

3 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 78; Farmer, Studies, pp. 12–15.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 529–30; Farmer, Arabic Musical Manuscripts in the

Bodleian Library (London, 1925), frontispiece, Oriental Studies: Mainly Musical (London, 1953), facing p. 66, and Minstrelsy, pls. 6, 12. The name—nāqūr—given the

instrument in d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, iii, p. 220, is incorrect.

5 Cf. Psantrin in Chap. V, p. 245.

6 Notices et extraits des manuscrits, xx (1865), p. 412.

7 Farmer, Studies, i, pp. 101–3.

8 R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, pp. 277–86; A. Pavlovskij, op. cit., in Byzant- inische Zeitschrift, ii (1893), p. 383; J. F. Riaño, Notes on Early Spanish Music (London, 1887), figs. 44/4–5.

9 Kinsky, op. cit., p. 18, fig. 2.

10 Farmer, Studies, i, p. 106.

11 E. de Coussemaker, Scriptores de musica medii aevi, i (Paris 1864–76), p. 152.

12 Bibliotheca geographorum arabicorum, v (Leiden, 1885), p. 59; King’s College (Cambridge) Persian MS. 211, fo. 19v.

13 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 78v.

Page 499

446

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

their verses,1 and we know of its shape from the time of ‘Abd

al-Qādir b. Ghaibī (d. 1435), although it may be seen in the frescoes

of Quṣair ‘Amra (eighth century), but here it is a plucked instrument.

The greatest of all the instruments of Islamic peoples was the ‘ūd

or lute. Its precursor was the Persian barbaṭ, although there existed

earlier lute types with parchment bellies. It was when the wooden-

bellied lute was adopted that the instrument was named the ‘ūd

(‘wood’).2 Before the Persian lute was adopted, the Arabs tuned their

lute Bb1–c1–f1–g1, but the new Persian accordatura gave it G–c–f–bb.

By the ninth century a fifth string, eb1, was added (see pl. 13 (a)).3 A lute

of six strings, the shashtār, was introduced later, one species of which

had sympathetic strings.4 From the tenth century the kaitāra was used

in Muslim Spain, perhaps a borrowing from the Mozárabes.5 A

diminutive of this name, kuwaitira (vulg. kuwītīra: Span. guitarra), is

still used in the Maghrib for a small lute. The shāhrūd was an archlute

invented in the tenth century; it originally had a compass of three

octayes.6 Another class of lute was the curiously shaped rubāb (not to

be confused with the bowed rabāb as in a misprint in the Legacy of

Islam, fig. 90), the lower part of the belly being of skin; it was mounted

with three to five strings tuned in fourths and was most popular in

Persia.7 The qūpūz was a Turko-Greek mandore, hollow throughout,

including the neck, and had five double strings.8 The shidurghū,

yātūghān, and pīpa have already been described.

Among pandores the types were innumerable. Al-Fārābī mentions

two, the ṭunbūr baghdādī (Baghdad pandore) or ṭunbūr mīzānī

(‘measured pandore’),9 and the ṭunbūr khurasānī (Khorasanian pan-

dore). The former had two strings, variously tuned, with a fretted

1 Farmer, ‘An Anonymous English-Arabic Fragment’, in Islamic Culture, xviii (1944),

p. 204; Kashf al-ḥumūm, Glasgow University MS. Bi 22-z. 18, fo. 263.

2 R. d’Erlanger (La Musique arabe, i, p. 323) thought that ‘ūd was a translation of

the Greek chelys which, he said, was a ‘tortoise’, but the Arabic lexica do not support

this. Curt Sachs (History of Musical Instruments, p. 253) has attempted to connect the

word ‘ūd morphologically with the ‘musical bow’ of the primitives by making the word

equate with ‘flexible stick’. This reading is also denied us by the lexicographers.

3 Farmer, Studies, ii, pp. 45-57. Farmer, Minstrelsy, pls. 1, 2, 9; R. Lachmann, Musik

des Orients, pl. 11; T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, fig. 89; A. U. Pope, op. cit., pls. 832c,

850b, 900, 909, 1308, 1316, 1330A, 1353.

4 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 77; Cairo MS. fo. j. 539, bab 4, maq. 2. Farmer, Turkish

Instruments, p. 43.

5 Madrid MS. (Arabic), 603, fo. 15r.

6 R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, p. 42-43. Farmer, History, frontispiece.

7 Kings’ College (Cambridge) Persian MSS., 211, fo. 20; Bodleian MS. Marsh, 282,

fo. 78; T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, op. cit., fig. 9; Encyclopaedia of Islam, iv, p. 987.

8 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iv, p. 986; Farmer, Turkish Instruments, pp. 36-37, and

Studies, i, pp. 72-75, fig. 25; Bodleian MS. Marsh, 282, f. 77v.

9 Al-Khwārizmī, Mafātīḥ al-‘ulūm (Leiden, 1895), p. 237.

Page 500

neck which gave a 'pagan scale' of quartertones.1 The latter also

had two strings, the frets being arranged in the order of limma,

limma, and comma.2 In the fourteenth-fifteenth centuries there were

innumerable pandores in use, and three may be mentioned. The

ṭunbūr-i shirvīnān (Shirvanian pandore) had a deep, pear-shaped

sound-chest, with a long neck, its two strings being tuned a tone

(204 cents) apart; the ṭunbūra-yi turkī (Turkish pandore), with a

smaller sound-chest but a longer neck, was mounted with two or

three strings tuned a fourth (498 cents) apart; both of these were

played with the fingers. The nāy ṭunbūr, however, was played with

a plectrum (miḍrāb) like the lute ('ūd), and had two strings a fourth

apart.3 The yūnqār was a Turkish three-stringed pandore invented

by Shamsī Chelebī, a son of the author (d. 1509) of Yūsuf va zulaika.4

The names, forms, and varieties of instruments in the Islamic east

and west of the past are legion, and several volumes would be required

to enumerate and describe them fully. How much they were treasured

by all, and how rapturously their music was appreciated, can be

justly evaluated only by a perusal of the countless lines of poetry

alone which have been devoted to their praises.5

THE PRACTICAL ART

The chief characteristics of Islamic music were, and are, modal

homophony, fioritura, and rhythm. From its earliest history this art

had been modal, and its systemization with the Arabs seems to have

been accomplished by Ibn Misjaḥ (d. c. 715). In Syria we are told

that he 'took hold' of the ideas of its lute players (barbaṭiyya) and

theorists (uṣṭūkhūsiyya = στοιχeiaτai), while in Iranian lands he

learned some of their singing (ghināʿ) and their rhythmic accompani-

ment (darb). When he returned to the Hijaz he adopted some of

these things which he had learned abroad into a new system of

music which he founded, although he 'rejected what was disagree-

able' in the notes or melodic modes (nagham) of Syria and Persia

which he considered were 'alien to Arabian music'. We are told that

the system formulated by him was thereafter accepted by the people.6

Yet we see that in spite of these accretions to Arabian music there

was still a characteristic indigenous basis.7

1 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, pp. 218–42.

2 Ibid. i, pp. 242–62.

3 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, fo. 77v.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 251–3; Farmer, Turkish Instruments, pp. 34–35.

5 Al-Nuwairī, Nihāyāt al-arab (Cairo, 1923–37), v, pp. 113–22; Shihāb al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Ismāʿīl, Safinat al-mulk (Cairo, A.H. 1309), pp. 464 ff.

6 Farmer, History, pp. 71–72.

7 J.P.N. Land, Transactions of the Ninth Congress of Orientalists (London, 1893), p. 156.

Page 501

448

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

This modal system, which Ibn Misjaḥ seems to have consolidated, consisted of eight ‘finger modes’ (aṣābiʿ), as we read in the earliest period of the Great Book of Songs (Kitāb al-aghānī al-kabīr) of Al-Iṣfahānī (d. 969), and each of these modes was classified according to its ‘course’ (majrā) either with the middle finger (wusṭā) on the lute, giving the minor third, or with the third finger (binṣir), giving the major third. That these modes may have been suggested by the Syrian ikhadias is most likely, but that they were not quite identical may be assumed from Al-Kindī,1 although the last word has not yet been said on this problem.2 These ‘finger modes’ dominated Arabian practical theory until the eleventh century when Persian ideas took a firmer hold on Islamic culture. They have been fully described by Ibn al-Munajjim (d. 912) in his Risāla fīʾl-mūsīqī (Treatise about Music). With one exception (No. 7) all of these modes were identical with the Greek and church modes. They are given here with the fourth string taken as base (‘imād):

  1. Muṭlaq fī majrā al-wusṭā G. A. Bb. c. d. e. f. g.

  2. Muṭlaq fī majrā al-binṣir G. A. B. c. d. e. f. g.

  3. Sabbāba fī majrā al-wusṭā A. Bb. c. d. e. f. g. a.

  4. Sabbāba fī majrā al-binṣir A. B. c. d. e. f. g. a.

  5. Wusṭā fī majrāhā Bb. c. d. e. f. g. a. bb.

  6. Binṣir fī majrāhā B. c. d. e. f. g. a. b.

  7. Khinṣir fī majrā al-wusṭā c. d. eb. f. g. a. b. c!.

  8. Khinṣir fī majrā al-binṣir c. d. e. f. g. a. b. c!.

The rhythmic modes (īqāʿāt), and there were eight of these also, are described by Al-Kindī (d. c. 874) as follows:

  1. Al-thaqīl al-awwal

  2. Al-thaqīl al-thānī

  3. Al-makhūrī

  4. Khafīf al-thaqīl

  5. Al-ramal

  6. Khafīf al-ramal

  7. Khafīf al-khafīf

  8. Al-hazaj

1 Farmer, History, p. 151, and Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence (London, 1930), pp. 240-6.

2 X. M. Collangettes, Journal Asiatique (1906), pp. 167-8. The present writer has dealt with the question fully in his Music in the Kitāb al-aghānī, still unpublished. Meanwhile consult Farmer, ‘The Song Captions in the Kitāb al-aghānī’, Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, xv (1955).

Page 502

THE PRACTICAL ART

449

Each of these modes is given above in its cycle (daur) or theme,

which is repeated ad libitum. It could be varied in its character, as

there were several species (anwā‘) , just as the order of the notes

(naghamāt) in the melodic modes (aṣābi‘) did not keep to their scale-

like order in performance.

In Persia, as we shall see,1 the melodic modes were known by

fanciful names rather than by descriptive ones, and by the time of

Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037) and Ibn Zaila (d. 1048) there were twelve in use.2

Before long we find these Persian titles being adopted by the Arabs,

although one may assume from their names that some agreed with the

older ‘finger modes’ in structure. By the thirteenth century these

twelve modes were called maqāmāt, and in addition there were six

secondary modes called in Persian avāzāt.3 With Turkoman and

Mughal sway came branch modes or modal formulas called shu‘ab,4

and by the fifteenth century there was a total of forty-eight modes,

now entitled shudūd.5 In Muslim Spain it had also become customary

to give fanciful names to their twenty-four ṭubū‘ or melodic modes, a

title which discloses their cosmic affiliation with the four elements

(ṭubū‘). As in eastern practice,6 these western modes, in submission

to the doctrine of the ethos, were allotted specific times of the day for

their performance,7 a conceit which still prevails.8 Here are the twelve

primary modes (maqāmāt) used in Eastern Islamic lands from the

thirteenth to the sixteenth century, seven of which have Persian

names. They are based on the oldest known manuscript (dated

  1. of the Sharafiyya of Ṣafī al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Mu’min preserved

at Berlin. The enharmonic form of these modes is due to the

adoption of the scale of the Systematists which proceeded by limma,

limma, comma. For a clearer apprehension of these new modes a

common tonic has been chosen, while the notes have been tran-

scribed into their nearest Occidental equivalent, although the fret-

ting of the lute on p. 463 should be consulted.

‘Ushshāq c. d. e. f. g. a. bb. c‘.

Nawā c. d. eb. f. g. ab. bb. c‘.

Būsalik c. db. eb. f. gb. ab. bb. c‘.

Rāst c. d. fb. f. g. bbb. bb. c‘.

1 See below.

2 R. d’Erlanger, op. cit., iii, pp. 135-6.

3 Farmer, History, p. 197.

4 British Museum MS. Or. 2361, ff. 26-267.

5 R. d’Erlanger, op. cit., pp. 397-401.

6 Farmer, History, p. 204, and An Old Moorish Lute Tutor, pp. 38-40.

7 Farmer, The Influence of Music: From Arabic Sources, passim.

8 A. Chottin, Tableau de la musique marocaine (Paris, 1939), p. 123.

B 3608

G g

Page 503

450

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

'Irāq c. eb. fb. f. abb. bbb. bb. dbb. cl.

Iṣfahān c. d. fb. f. g. bbb. bb. dbb. cl.

Zīrāfkand c. eb. eb. f. abb. ab. bbb. cb. cl.

Buzurk c. eb. fb. f. abb. g. a. cb. cl.

Zankūla c. d. fb. f. abb. bbb. bb. dbb. cl.

Rahāwī c. eb. fb. f. abb. ab. bb. cl.

Ḥusainī c. eb. eb. f. abb. ab. bb. cl.

Ḥijāzī c. eb. fb. f. abb. bbb. bb. cl.

By the sixteenth century, under Persian influence, the old Pythagorean scale—already flourishing in Persia since the fourteenth century—found acceptance in the Near East. This meant that not only the notes of the maqāmāt, avāzāt, and shu'ab were changed, but their forms also. They were now no longer ‘modes’ in the commonly understood sense of the term (i.e. scales within the gamut of which melodies were composed) but melodic patterns which became matrices for composition, as one may see from the examples given by Laborde, Villoteau, and Kiesewetter.1 It may be thought that these patterns restricted originality in composition, but actually they meant no more than the Occidental practice of fixed diatonic sequences.

The second element in Islamic music, fioriture (zawā’id, taḥāsīn, zuwwāq), consisted of shakes, grace notes, the drawled scale, appoggiatura, and the tarkīb. This last device was the occasional decoration of the melody, by striking certain notes simultaneously with their fourth, fifth, or octave. All of this arabesque or festooning gave great licence to performers to display their artistry. Special syllables were set apart for the vocal decoration, such as lā and yā, although the more conventional yā lailī would be just as often used. In the instrumental sphere, one form of decoration was the above-mentioned tarkīb. Ibn Sīnā (d. 1035) gave this name tarkīb (lit. organum) to doubling simultaneously with the fifth, fourth, or other interval except the octave which was naturally termed the taḍ‘īf. The interval of the third is not mentioned specifically, but its use is obviously implied among those ‘other’ intervals. Many of these are given in a lute exercise by Al-Kindī (d. c. 874) which is contained in a unique manuscript in the Staatsbibliothek at Berlin (Ahlwardt, Verzeichniss, 5530, fo. 25–31) which is probably a fragment of the work entitled The Treatise on Music in Relation to the Corporeal Natures (Risāla fī . . . al-naghm . . . ‘alā ṭabā’i‘ al-ashkhāṣ). In it are described two kinds of movements by the plectrum hand and fingers: one which struck

1 See Vol. II, pp. 42–43, for the parallel Byzantine practice.

Page 504

two notes simultaneously 'with one movement', and another in which

three notes were struck successively 'with three movements'. Here is

this exercise. It opens with a phrase which shows these two move-

ments. This is followed by three simultaneous unisons, obtained by

the fourth finger on one string and the open string of another. (See

pp. 446, 457.) The remaining phrases explain themselves. The exercise

has been transposed.

Ex. 319

The third constituent was rhythm (ῑqā'). By the third quarter of

the seventh century this had already been systematized, since we read

of four rhythmic modes, and under the Umayyad régime (661–750)

two more had been added.1 By the ninth or tenth century there were

seven or eight principal (uṣūl) rhythmic modes used by the Mesopo-

tamian and Syrian Arabs as described by Al-Kindī2 and Al-Fārābī.3

By the days of Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd al-Mu'min (d. 1294), the Persians

had added some modes of their own devising.4 When Turkomanian

and Turkish influence made itself felt in the Near and Middle East,

new rhythms in galore were tapped out, and the craze for novelty grew

apace. By the fifteenth century there were no fewer than twenty-one

rhythmic modes,5 while Al-Lādhiqī (c. 1481–1512) gives a total of

thirty.6

In the eyes and ears of the Arabs, vocal music was superior to

instrumental, and this preference lasted until the final scenes depicted

in the monumental work of Al-Iṣfahānī (d. 967). After that, Persian,

Turkomanian, Mughal, and Turkish tastes brought instrumental

music more to the fore. How important was the vocal art may be

gleaned from Al-Fārābī who devoted a section to 'production'—

head notes, chest notes, nasalized notes, and so on; adverting to the

glottal hiatus (nabar), and the whys and hows of the staccato notes

(shadharāt) and long-vowel notes (amālāt), as well as the various

1 Farmer, History, p. 71. To Al-Khalīl (d. c. 791) a 'Book of Rhythm' (Kitāb al-Iqā')

has been attributed. See Farmer, Sources, p. 14.

2 Farmer, Sa'adyah Gaon, pp. 78–99, which contains the notation of the rhythmic

modes.

3 R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. ii, pp. 40–48.

4 Ibid. iii, pp. 172–8.

5 Ibid. iii, pp. 183–232.

6 Ibid. iv, pp. 470–98.

Page 505

452

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

forms of songs.1 Dynamics, as we understand the term, had no existence in Islamic music, which was essentially a quiescent art, and its instruments, whether for solo work or accompaniment were, of necessity, in accordance with this tranquility; indeed we must always think of this art in terms of chamber music.2 It is true that we sometimes read of fifty or so lutenists playing together, but such occurrences were unusual.3 Throughout the book of Al-Iṣfahānī it is generally the lute, flute, or reed-pipe that is displayed, and the well-known miniature which accompanies the story of Iṣḥāq al-Mauṣilī in the Maqāmāt of Al-Ḥarīrī (d. 1122) shows only a lute and reed-pipe.4 In the later Arabian Nights5 and in the subsequent miniatures of Persian art, more bounteous instrumental displays are granted: the lute, flute, psaltery, reed-pipe, viol, and harp in concert. Of course, these combinations invariably included the tambourine or drum, since these determined the rhythm, although not all music was submitted to this mensural discipline.

The forms of musical composition were various. The nashīd, originally a nasal psalming was, in the time of Al-Fārābī, unrhythmic,6 but later it was submitted to rhythm.7 The basit, of light character, was a vocal piece with an instrumental prelude (ṭarīqa), although it was set later to more imposing rhythms.8 The ḍarb was a composition in which two rhythmic modes were used simultaneously. Some lengthy compositions were to be found in the kull al-ḍurūb and the kull al-nagham, which implied, respectively, the use of all the rhythmic modes and all the melodic modes in sequence.

Among the Persians, Khorasanian, and Turkomans of the tenth century, instrumental pieces known as the ṭarā’iq and rawāsin were immensely popular.9 Later it was the ‘amal, naqsh, ṣaut, ḥawā’ī, and muraṣṣa‘ which were in demand. The first was of a composite nature and opened with a prelude. The second, as its name tells us, had ‘decoration’ as its characteristic. The last two had much in common by way of their fantasia-like construction. The most important of all was the ‘suite’ called the nauba. This seems to have originated at the ‘Abbāsid court, where the performers who attended at special hours on particular days, played in succession (nauba), and since each minstrel usually excelled in some particular type of music, a combination of these features into one performance or piece was named a

1 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, ii, pp. 79 ff.

2 Farmer, Oriental Studies: Mainly Musical (London, 1953), p. 58.

3 Farmer, History, pp. 72, 102.

4 Farmer, Minstrelsy, pls. 1, 8.

5 R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. ii, p. 94.

6 Ibid., p. 6.

7 Ibid. iv, p. 233.

8 Ibid. iv, p. 235.

9 Ibid. i, p. 17.

Page 506

nauba.1 Up to the fourteenth century the nauba comprised four

movements, the qaul, ghazal, tarāna, and furū-dāsht, but in the year

1379, 'Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī introduced a fifth movement called

the mustazād.2 Each of these sections, which were vocal, was pre-

ceded by an instrumental prelude (tarīqa). Later still, the instrumental

chef d'œuvre known as the pishrev (Ar. bashrau) was used as an over-

ture to the nauba. In Muslim Spain the nauba gharnaṭi, as it is now

called, was known in its twenty-four modes.3 The eastern nauba was

carried on by the Ottoman Turks and had constituent parts not un-

like the 'suite' of Persia.4

What the Islamic music of these days was actually like is not easy

to determine because of the mere scrap which has come down to us,

and even this presents on paper less vitality than our transcription

of the neumatically notated compositions of the early Christian

Church. It has been stated that the Great Book of Songs of Isḥāq

al-Mauṣilī contained music.5 This is quite fallacious. At the same

time it is equally erroneous to state that the 'Arabs never had a

musical notation'.6 In early days, neither the Arabs or Persians com-

mitted their compositions to paper as a general rule, although Ibn

Sīnā tells us that a stenography was used by practitioners for this

purpose.7 Yet the theorists from the time of Al-Kindī used an alpha-

betic notation.8 It is not until the thirteenth century, however,

that we have examples of music recorded by this means, and the

present writer has published two specimens,9 while other examples

exist in the works of 'Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī (d. 1435).10 In these

compositions the pitch of the notes is determined by an alphabetic

notation and the mensural values by a numerical one. Meanwhile

a semi-staff notation arose farther east in Khwārizm where, in the

time of the Shāh 'Alā al-Dīn Muḥammad (d. 1220), an eighteen-line

stave was used to carry a pitch and mensural notation.11 It was not

unlike the early attempts of western Europe.12 In Syria we know from

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 855–7.

2 R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. iv, pp. 236–8.

3 Farmer, An Old Moorish Lute Tutor, pp. 19–24; Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp.

386–7.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, p. 386.

5 Phyllis Ackerman, in A. U. Pope, A Survey of Persian Art (1939), p. 2812.

6 Grove's Dictionary of Music (1940), i, p. 66

7 Farmer, Historical Facts, p. 91.

8 Ibid., pp. 312 ff.

9 Farmer, History, p. 202, and Minstrelsy, frontispiece.

10 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, ff. 93v–95.

11 V. Belaiev, 'Khoresmian Notation', The Sackbut, iv (1924), p. 171, and 'Turko-

manian Music', Promusica, v (1927), p. 4.

12 M. Gerbert, Scriptores (St. Blaise, 1784), i, p. 157.

Page 507

454

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

a treatise by Shams al-Dīn al-Saiḍawī al-Dhahabī (16th. cent.) that a more practical scheme had been evolved in which a stave of seven to nine coloured horizontal lines served for this purpose,1 a device somewhat similar to that shown in eastern Europe by Vincenzo Galilei (1581) and Kircher (1650).2

At the period when the Arabs and Persians wrote music by means of an alphabetic (abjadī) and numeric (‘adadī) notation, the former stood for the pitch of the note (naghma) whilst the latter represented its mensural (mīzānī) extent. Reference to the fretting of the lute (‘ūd) on p. 463, where the accordatura (taswiyya) is G–c–f–b♭–e♭1, will explain the reason for introducing the special flat sign to indicate the minor tone of 180 cents which is a comma lower than the whole tone of 204 cents, reserving the ordinary flat ♭ to indicate a note which is a limma of 90 cents.

Here is one verse (bait = stanza) of a song (ṣaut) taken from the Kitāb al-adwār, said to have been written before 1236, but more probably twenty years later, by Ṣafī al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Mu’min (d. 1294). It is in the melodic mode (ṭarīqa) of kuwāsht, set to the rhythmic mode (ḍarb) of the ramal al-ḍiyyā, better known as the khafīf ramal. The transcription is made from the British Museum Manuscript Or. 2361, fo. 32, but with the copyist’s errors rectified by comparison with other manuscripts. This has meant changing the minims for the syllables ba-ti into crotchets. That was necessary on account of the measure. The melody has been transposed. (See upper part of pl. 14 (a).)

Ex. 320

'A - lā' lā - hajri lā wal-lā-hi mā a - nā sā-bi - ru,

Wa ghai-rī 'a - lā faq - di al-a - hi -b-ba-ti qā-dī - ru.

('Desertion, by Allāh, I cannot abjure, Though some, the loss of a lover could endure!')

1 Bodleian MS. Marsh 82, ff. 70–73; J. B. de la Borde, Essai sur la musique (Paris, 1780), i. pp. 183–90; J. P. N. Lard, ‘Topschriftversuche und Melodieproben aus dem muhammedanischen Mittelalter’, Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft, ii (1886), pp. 348–50.

2 Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 323–6.

Page 508

THE PRACTICAL ART

455

The rhythmic modes had changed considerably since the time of Al-Kindī (see p. 448) and those shown in these examples on a single stave line under the melody, would have been performed on a tambourine (dā'ira) with jingling metal plates (ṣunūj) or bells (jalājil) in the frame, a drum (tabl), or tiny kettledrums (nuqairāt). Two or more tones were obtained on these instruments, one of them low and strong and the other high and weak. In addition to these the plectrum (miḍrāb), by which the strings of the lute were pulsated, also obeyed this rhythm when it was convenient. Since the rhythmic phrase (daur) of the ramal mode comprised twelve beats it has enabled us to submit the music to the un-Oriental custom of using a time signature and bars. Here is a theme in the old mode known as the mujannab al-ramal. (See lower part of pl. 14(a).)

Ex. 321

The last example is the melody of a hemistich (miṣrā') of the first verse of a song called 'Alā ṣabbikum. It is in the naurūz melodic mode and the ramal rhythmic mode. This is also from the Kitāb al-adwār of Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd al-Mu'min, although the transcription is made from a different manuscript in the British Museum, viz. Or. 136, fo. 38ᵛ. The contour of the melody, being plain and simple, may appear to be quite uninteresting in itself. In performance, however, when the singer and players introduced fioriture, a far more intriguing picture would have been presented. These ornaments were termed tahāsin, and since the cleverness of singer and instrumentalist was judged by their ingenuity in the use of fioriture it is no wonder that 'applause' and 'approbation' went by the name of tahsin. Here is this melody. (See pl. 14(b).)

Ex. 322.

In view of the above it is evident that we possess no written Arabian music earlier than the thirteenth century, no Persian before the fourteenth century, and no similar example of Turkish music prior to the seventeenth. On the other hand, there is an enormous

Page 509

456

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

amount of music handed down orally and by rote. The Maulawiyya darwīsh fraternities claim to use music composed by Al-Fārābī.1

One of the movements of the Turkish suite (faṣl) known as the kiār contains, in most of its modes, examples of the works of ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī (d. 1435), and although these, like what has preceded, have also been handed down orally, they may be more authentic since the composer’s Treasury of Melodies (Kanz al-alḥān), which contained his compositions, existed until recent years.2 Lastly, the naubāt andalusiyya or gharnaṭiyya (i.e. of ‘Andalusia’ or ‘Granada’), still played in the Maghrib handed down by the refugees of the expulsions of the ‘Moors’ from Spain, exist in many specimens,3

although those in the sika and jahārka modes cannot be earlier than the sixteenth century and cannot be Andalusian.

Finally, there is the question of form. Since every verse in Arabic poetry contains a complete thought, a short melody was made to fit this alone, the same being repeated for each subsequent verse. It was Ibn Muḥriz (d. c. 715) who introduced a different melody for the second verse. When the refrain came into popularity, as in the zajal in Spain, this also necessitated a different melody. Yet although these short melodies were repeated times out of number, especially in a classical ode (qaṣīda), they were not always used in precisely the same form, since it was in its variation that the singer, in his handling of the ‘gloss’ or fioritura, was able to display his artistry and originality. It was much the same in instrumental music.

THE THEORY OF MUSIC

That Islamic savants were supremely gifted in the field of mathematics is universally acknowledged,4 and they were especially so in the science of music (‘ilm al-mūsīqī).5 At the threshold we meet with what Al-Fārābī (d. c. 950) calls a ‘pagan scale’, i.e. a scale from pre-Islamic times.6 It was to be found on a fretted instrument called the ṭunbūr mīzānī (measured pandore) or ṭunbūr baghdādī (Baghdad pandore). Its fingerboard was divided into forty equal parts, the frets giving a scale of quarter tones.7 Although this instrument and scale

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, ii, p. 54.

2 Personal information from the late Ra’ūf Yektā Bey.

3 N. E. Yafil, Répertoire de musique arabe et maure (Algiers, 1904); Majmū‘ al-aghānī wa’l-alḥān min kalām al-andalus (Algiers, 1904); A. Chottin, Corpus de musique marocaine (Paris, 1931); Rouanet, op. cit., pp. 2845–77.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, i, pp. 989–90; ii, pp. 257–8, 315–16; T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, The Legacy of Islam, pp. 376–97.

5 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, pp. 749–55.

6 R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, p. 227.

7 Ibid. i, p. 218. The interval was known to Eratosthenes. See Ptolemy, Harmonicorum (Oxford, 1682), ii, p. 14.

Page 510

PLATE XIII

(a)

(b)

(c)

ARABIC INSTRUMENTS

(a) Lute of 5 double strings (A.D. 1333-4)

(b) Psaltery of 32 strings (A.D. 1333-4)

(c) Harp of 34 strings (A.D. 1326-7)

See also pages xxi and 462-3

Page 512

THE THEORY OF MUSIC

persisted in Islamic civilization until the fifteenth century, seemingly

only for the performance of those 'pagan melodies' of which Al-

Fārābī speaks, its place in the evolution of the Arabian scale is vague.

What sort of scale obtained in the early days of Islam, when the

system of Ibn Misjaḥ (d. c. 715) was established, we have no certain

knowledge, but all evidence seems to show that it was the Pytha-

gorean. It was not until the time of Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī (d. 850) that we

get a complete view of the theory and scale of the Old Arabian

School. Possibly two early works may have dealt with this system,

the Book of Melody (Kitāb al-naghm) of Yūnus al-Kātib (d. c. 765)

and the Book of Melody by the father of prosody Al-Khalīl b.

Aḥmad (d. c. 791), but none of these has been spared for us.1 In any

case, these works would have been based on what I have frequently

termed 'practical theory', in contradistinction from 'scientific

theory'. Indeed, a later writer, Ibn al-Munajjim (d. 912), very aptly

distinguished between these two schools of theorists as 'the masters

of Arabian music (ghinā̄)' and 'the masters of [Greek] music

(mūsīqī)'.2 In the Old Arabian School, all theory was made to con-

form to the lute, in the same way as the Greeks used the kithara for

this purpose. According to Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī and his pupils Ibn al-

Munajjim and Ibn Khurdādhbih, the scale of this school was

Pythagorean, and here is the fretting of its lute in cents:3

1 Isis, xxxvi (1946), p. 128.

2 Farmer, Historical Facts, p. 243.

3 Cents are hundredths of an equal semitone. It has been stated that Isḥāq al-Mauṣilī's

accordatura of the Arabian lute gave a fifth (702 cents) between the third and second

strings. I have shown this to be completely erroneous; the tuning was by fourths (498

cents) throughout. See my Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence (London,

1930), pp. 280–5, and cf. the persistent views of Kathleen Schlesinger in The Oxford

Page 513

458

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

Prior to this, certain alien elements had entered the scale. Persian

practitioners had been using their own second finger fret (303 cents),

and a certain instrumentalist at Baghdad, Zalzal (d. 791), had intro-

duced a neutral third (355 cents). Confusion and embarrassment

followed these innovations, and it was to rectify the position, it would

seem, that Ishāq al-Mauṣilī recast the theory of the old Arabian

school into its original Pythagorean mould, which was accomplished,

we are told, without recourse to the Greek theorists who were unknown

in Arabic at that date.1

By the middle of the ninth century the famous treatises of the

Greeks were translated, some through Syriac, into Arabic, and most

of them had appeared before the close of the century. Aristotle's De

anima, the Problemata, and other works of his were well known.

The Harmonica of Aristoxenus which we possess today is known to

have been constructed from two works, the στοιχεῖα and the ἀρxαί.2

That the latter was a separate work existing in the ninth century is

evidenced by the translated Arabic work, the Kitāb al-rūʼūs, as was

demonstrated in 1928.3 That his lost work on rhythm also existed in

Arabic at this time is shown by his Kitāb al-īqā‘ (Book of Rhythm).

Euclid was known by a Kitāb al-naghm called al-mūsīqī, which

was obviously the Introductio harmonica, now attributed to Cleo-

nides, and a Kitāb al-qānūn which was clearly the Sectio canonis.

Nicomachus appeared in Arabic in more than one book. The present

Enchiridion which we possess in Greek includes fragments from

another treatise, unknown, but the Arabic book of Nicomachus, the

Kitāb al-mūsīqī al-kabīr (Opus Major on Music) proves that he did

write that ‘larger work‘ which he had promised in the Enchiridion.

That the Harmonica of Ptolemy was also translated into Arabic there

is considerable evidence, and it is likely that Aristides Quintilianus

was similarly represented. In addition there were commentaries on

Aristotle's De anima by Themistius and Alexander of Aphrodisias,

as well as other works, that were known in Arabic.4

The first-fruits of this epoch-making harvest by the Bait al-ḥikma

or ‘House of Wisdom', as this school of translators at Baghdad was

called, was the interest taken in music by the ‘philosopher of the

Arabs‘, Al-Kindī, whose extant treatises on the theory of music

History of Music, Introductory Volume (London, 1929), pp. 103–4, and The Greek

Aulos (London, 1939), pp. 274–90, 537–40, in spite of my protests.

1 Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. v, p. 53; British Museum MS. Or. 2361, f. 237v.

2 Cf. pp. 342–3.

3 Farmer, ‘Greek Theorists of Music in Arabic Translation‘, Isis, xiii (1930), p. 326.

(A paper read before the 17th Congress of Orientalists. Oxford, 1928.)

4 Farmer, Sources, pp. 23–30.

Page 514

THE THEORY OF MUSIC

459

reveal his dependence on Greek theory.1 Other leading scholars then

crowded into the arena of music theory: Al-Sarakhsī (d. 899),

Thābit b. Qurra (d. 901), Muḥammad b. Zakariyyā al-Rāzī (d. 932),

Quṣṭa b. Lūqā (d. 932), and the famous Al-Fārābī.2 Only the works

of the first and last have survived the holocausts of the past. Al-

Kindī was well acquainted with Euclid, and probably with Ptolemy

also. Indeed his Book of the Division of the Canon (Kitāb fī qismat al-

qānūn) was most likely a commentary on Euclid's work. Ziryāb, in

Muslim Spain, had already added a fifth string to the lute, and

Al-Kindī did likewise in the east, so as to enable him to reach the

jamāʿat al-tāmma (σύστημα τϵ́λειον). He then sought to introduce a

semitonal fret called the ‘anterior’ (mujannab) between the nut and

the first finger fret, but owing to the fixed fretting of the lute, his

innovation presented a difficulty in that while the new fret, giving an

interval called the baqiyya (90 cents), i.e. the Greek limma, fitted in

admirably on the fourth, third, and second strings, it was flat by a

comma of 24 cents on the first and the new ‘extra’ strings. To obviate

this he added another fret of an interval called the infiṣāl, the Pytha-

gorean apotomē (114 cents) which, although not used on the three

lower strings, gave the desired notes on the two higher strings, thus:3

1 Farmer, The Influence of Music: From Arabic Sources, pp. 101-3; History, pp. 151-

3; Saʿadyah Gaon, pp. 12-16; R. Lachmann and M·el-Hefni, Jaʿqūb Ibn Isḥāq al-Kindī

(Leipzig, 1931), passim.

2 Farmer, Sources, pp. 19-36.

3 Farmer, Studies, ii, pp. 47-48. This, and the above fretting of the lute of Isḥāq

al-Mauṣilī (d. 850), disposes of the gratuitous assumption of Willi Apel that ‘Al-Fārābī

[d. c. 950] introduced a new scale based on the interval of the fourth . . . 0-204-294-408-

498’, Harvard Dictionary of Music (Harvard, 1944), p. 45.

Page 515

460

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

Al-Kindī's scale reveals that the Persian and Zalzalian accretions at 303 and 355 cents had lost recognition in Mesopotamia, and this inhibition partly continued, as we know from the Risālat al-mūsiqī of the Ikhwān al-Ṣafā (c. 980).1 In Syria, however, these anomalies were at least acknowledged, together with their concomitant notes, as we see in Al-Fārābī:2

The above scheme represents all the intervals recognized in lute playing at this period, and does not necessarily imply that any one lute was so fretted. According to Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-Khwārizmī (fl. 976-7), writing in Khorasan and Transoxiana, the Persian and Zalzalian thirds were being used in those lands, revealing how far afield they had been accepted.3 Al-Fārābī was a good mathematician and physicist, and his Grand Book of Music (Kitāb al-mūsiqī al-kabīr) is not only ‘the most important treatise on the theory of Oriental music’,4 but the greatest work on music which had been written up to his time. He was certainly in advance of the Greeks.5 Later came the Ikhwān al-Ṣafā (c. 980), whose contribution

1 F. Dieterici, op. cit., pp. 118-20. 2 Farmer, Studies, ii, pp. 49-50.

3 Mafātīḥ al-‘ulūm, pp. 240-2; Farmer, Studies, ii, p. 50.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, ii, p. 54.

5 Baron Carra de Vaux, in R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i. pp. vii-xi.

Page 516

THE THEORY OF MUSIC

461

to acoustics is noteworthy.1 In Egypt a great physicist, the Alhazen

of European fame, more properly Ibn al-Haitham (d. 1039), wrote a

Commentary on [Cleonides'] Harmonics (Maqāla fī sharḥ al-[a]rmūn-

iqī) and a Commentary on Euclid's Canon (Kitāb sharḥ qānūn Uqlaidis),

both of which have unfortunately perished.2

In Persia there appeared the works of the famous Avicenna, i.e.

Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037), The Cure (al-Shifā), and The Deliverance (al-

Najāt), which contain full information on the state of musical theory

in Iranian lands, as does the Book of Sufficiency in Music (Kitāb al-

kāfī fi'l-mūsīqī) of Ibn Zaila (d. 1048). Ibn Sīnā does not appear to

have accepted Al-Kindī's solution of the difficulty of the 'anterior'

(mujannab) fret at 90 cents by duplicating it at 114 cents. Further, he

assigns 343 cents for Zalzal's second finger (wustā) fret, with its

'anterior' fellow at 139 cents. Nor does he admit the 'anterior' fret

at 90 cents, but furnishes the just semitone of 112 cents in its place.

Yet he realized that the normal tuning of the lute in fourths would

not produce Zalzal's second finger fret in the second octave, and

to remedy this he suggested an alternative accordatura (taswiyya).

By tuning the 1st string (zīr) a major third (408 cents) higher than the

2nd string (mathnā), instead of a fourth (498 cents), Zalzal's in-

tractable notes were regularized as follows:3

1 Encyclopaedia of Islam, iii, p. 752.

2 Farmer, Sources, p. 42; 'Greek Theorists of Music', Isis, xiii (1930), p. 331.

3 Farmer, Studies, ii, pp. 54–57; R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. ii, pp. 234–6; M. el-Hefnī,

Ibn Sina's Musiklehre (Berlin, 1930), pp. 71–73.

Page 517

462

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

In other parts of the Islamic East there were many more who were interested in music theory, and in Syria there flourished Ibn al-Naqqāsh (d. 1178), Abu'l-Ḥakam al-Bāhilī and his son Abu'l-Majd Muḥammad (d. 1180), as well as 'Alam al-Dīn Qaiṣar (d. 1251).1

In Muslim Spain there was a long run of theorists beginning with Ibn Firnās (d. 888), 'the first who taught the science of music in al-Andalus'.2 In the tenth century (?), 'Alī b. Sa'īd al-Andalusī compiled a book On the Composition of Melodies [Risāla fi ta'lif al-alḥān].3

Greater still were the savants of the twelfth century, when Ibn Bājja or Avenpace (d. 1139) wrote a Book of Music (Kitāb al-mūsīqī), and the Commentary on Aristotle's 'De anima' (Sharḥ fi'l-nafs li Arisṭū-ṭālis) of Ibn Rushd or Averroës (d. 1198) was famous in its day, especially in Latin.4

In the east both Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1209) and Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 1273) wrote on music,5 the contribution of the former being found in his Collector of the Sciences (Jāmi' al-'ulūm).6

In Baghdad, in the service of the last of the 'Abbāsid caliphs, was the greatest musician of his day, Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd al-Mu'min (d. 1294), whose two works on theory, The Sharafian Treatise on Harmonic Relations (Risālat al-sharafiyya fī nisab al-ta'lifiyya) and the Book of Modes (Kitāb al-adwār), made history.7

He was the founder, or organizer, of the Systematist school of music theory, a circumstance which has earned him the title of 'the Zarlino of the Orient',8 while Helmholtz considered his theories to be 'noteworthy in the history of music'.9

He derived his scale from the Khorasanian pandore, whose successive frets of limma, limma, comma have been detailed by Al-Fārābī.10

How Ṣafī al-Dīn used it on the lute is shown on the opposite page.11 One can see at a glance that this scale affords consonances purer than our tempered system,12 and Sir Hubert Parry considered it 'the most perfect scale ever devised'.13

It was this system that led so many writers to refer erroneously to the existence of 'thirds of a tone' in Arabian and Persian music.

1 Farmer, History, pp. 223–5.

2 Farmer, Sources, p. 39; and History, p. 177.

3 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. i, p. 148.

4 Farmer, Sources, p. 44.

5 Ibid., pp. 45, 47.

6 British Museum MS. Or. 2972, ff. 151v–155r.

7 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 191–2; R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. iii, pp. v–xiv. See pl. 13.

8 R. G. Kiesewetter, Die Musik der Araber (Leipzig, 1842), p. 13.

9 The Sensations of Tone (London, 1895), p. 283.

10 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, i, pp. 242–62.

11 Ibid. iii, pp. 371, ff.; Carra de Vaux, Le Traité des rapports musicaux (Paris, 1891), pp. 52–58.

12 Riemann, Catechism of Musical History, ii (London, 1892), p. 65.

13 The Art of Music (London, 1896), p. 29.

Page 518

THE THEORY OF MUSIC 463

This theory soon enveloped both the Near and Middle East, where we see it fully utilized by the Persian theorists Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī (d. 1310) in his Jewel of the Crown (Durrat al-tāj)1 and by Muḥammad b. Maḥmūd al-Āmulī (fourteenth century) in his Precious Things of the Sciences (Nafā'is al-funūn).2 It was also the basis of the Persian Treasure-house of Rarities (Kanz al-tuhaf) of the same century,3 and the prompting of that masterly Arabic treatise entitled the Maulanā Mubārak Shāh Commentary by Al-Jurjānī (d. 1413).4 It was the sheet-anchor of the Persian Collector of Melodies (Jāmi‘ al-alḥān) of ‘Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī (d. 1435),5 the Arabic Muḥammad b. Murād Treatise,6 and the book called The Conqueror (Al-Fathiyya) by Al-Lādhīqī a few decades later.7 The same dependence is traceable in the Turkish Book of Modes (Kitāb al-adwār) of Khidr b. ‘Abdallāh,8 and the treatise of Aḥmad Uglū Shukrallāh.9

Side by side with this systematist theory there was still to be found the occasional expression in Persia of the less intricate teaching of the old Arabian school, the occurrence of which led Kiesewetter to

1 British Museum MS. Add 7694.

2 Ibid., Add. 16827. 3 Ibid., Or. 2361.

4 R. d'Erlanger, op. cit. iii, passim, especially the preface by the present writer.

5 Bodleian MS. Marsh 282, passim. 6 British Museum MS. Or. 2361, ff. 7 R. d'Erlanger, op. cit., iv, passim.

8 Berlin MS. See J. G. L. Kosegarten, Alii Ispahanensis Liber Cantilenarum Magnus (Greifswald, 1840), p. 36.

9 Information from the late Ra'ūf Yektā Bey.

Page 519

464

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

imagine that it was introduced by Christian missionaries.1 Yet, as Helmholtz said of this suggestion: ‘The Europeans of those days could teach the Orientals nothing that they did not know better themselves, except some rudiments of harmony which they did not want.’2 The teachings of the systematist school lasted in the Near East until the sixteenth century when the old Arabian system, i.e. the Pythagorean, found acceptance once more. Yet the longing for the diverse chromaticisms of the past, especially such variants as the minor tone (180) and the Systematists Zalzalian third (384), which had coloured their music and charmed their ears in the past had not died, and it was that yearning which gave birth to the modern quarter-tone system.

THE INFLUENCE

Most historians have allowed that it was to the Arabs and Persians that ‘the mediaeval world, from Samarcand to Seville, for a very long time, owed its highest literary and scientific culture’.3 It would not be too much to add ‘artistic culture’. That this great artistic urge, which included music, should have made itself felt in the neighbouring east is easily understood, because many of these lands had much in common culturally. It is true that the Arabs borrowed a few technical musical words from the Persians, as well as the accomplishments which these terms implied, but the Persians returned the compliment by adopting the entire Arabic musical nomenclature. That both India and Turkestan borrowed innumerable instruments and technical practices through Arab-Persian persuasion is evident to this day. One can also appreciate why peoples culturally inferior, overwhelmed by the impact of Islam, should also be unable to resist its musical influence. We find this with the Berbers of North Africa, the Negroes of the western Sudan, the Swahili on the East African coast, and the Malagasy, who have all been borrowers from this fount, while the names of musical instruments in distant Celebes, Borneo, Java, and even ‘Far Cathay’ carry evidence of their origin.

In Europe Islamic cultural influence took a different turn. Greece, at Europe’s eastern outpost, had always been absorbent of Oriental ideas, and so was Byzantium.4 Not a single Byzantine theoretical work

1 Die Musik der Araber, pp. 14, 46-49. Through a misunderstanding of the Arabic term mithl, which Kiesewetter called Messel, a host of writers have given the unmeaning title of ‘Messel system’ to the theory standardized by Ṣafī al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Mu’min, while prompting others to refer erroneously to the scale of the latter as comprising ‘third tones’ (Dritteltöne).

2 Op. cit., p. 285.

3 R. A. Nicholson, A Literary History of the Arabs (London, 1914), pp. 446-7.

4 Cambridge Mediaeval History, iv (Cambridge, 1923), pp. 152, 773.

Page 520

PLATE XIV

(a)

(b)

ARABIC MUSIC MANUSCRIPTS

(a) Upper half: Song in the Kuwāsht mode

Lower half: Melody in the Mujannab al-ramal mode

(b) Melody in the Naurūz mode. Late 13th century

For transcriptions see pages 454-5

Page 522

THE INFLUENCE

465

on music was put forward from the time of Anonymus II (fourth

century) until Psellos (fl. 1050); it was only the Arabic authors who

were producing works of speculative theory.1 We know that it was

the Greek Mūrisṭus manuscripts, translated into Arabic, which brought about the revival of the hydraulus in Byzantium and western

Europe, when Muslim constructors began to build this instrument

from the long-forgotten Mūrisṭus designs.2 Byzantium continued to

be the highway by which many other ‘Saracen arts’ came to the West.3

As late as the Crusades Christian Europe, impressed by the use of

the Saracen military band, made it a part of its own martial tactics.4

The more important impress of Islamic civilization on Europe

was due to the presence of Muslims in the Iberian peninsula, Sicily,

and elsewhere. Spain, which was in Muslim hands, more or less,

from the eighth to the fifteenth century, became the centre from which

this new culture radiated to the rest of Europe. Indeed it is to this

land that we must turn for some of the influences which directly

affected the Renaissance.5 The poverty of Christian Europe in the

sphere of music theory and its stagnation in the practical field are

suggested by the fact that from the end of the sixth century to the

mid-ninth century no work on theory appeared in western Europe.6

While Europe only knew the Greek theorists through scraps inter-

preted by Martianus Capella, Boëthius, and Cassiodorus, the Muslims

possessed complete Arabic translations of Aristotle, Aristoxenus,

Nicomachus, Euclid, Cleonides, and probably Ptolemy and Aristides

Quintilianus.7 Muslim theorists themselves, from Al-Kindī (d. c.

  1. to Al-Jurjānī (d. 1413), had produced important works on the

theory of music.8 What Al-Fārābī and the Ikhwān al-Ṣafā in the tenth

century had to say on acoustics was undoubtedly in advance of the

Greeks. They certainly acknowledged the Greeks as their teachers,

but they were critical enough to specify or to ignore some blunders.

The Arabic commentaries on Euclid’s Canon and Aristotle’s De

anima must surely have led to some advance in the speculative art.9

It is true that most of these treatises had remained in the Arabic

1 Farmer, Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence, pp. 290–4.

2 Farmer, The Organ of the Ancients, chap. viii.

3 Cambridge Mediaeval History, ii, p. 592.

4 Encyclopaedia of Islam, v, pp. 217–21; Farmer ‘Oriental Influences on Occidental

Military Music’, Islamic Culture, xv (1941), pp. 235–8.

5 C. H. Haskins, Studies in the History of Mediaeval Science (Cambridge, U.S.A.,

1924), p. 3.

6 Excluding the unoriginal Isidore of Seville. See Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 177–96,

203–28.

7 See above, p. 458.

8 Farmer, Sources, pp. 19–21, 56.

9 See Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 292–4.

B 3608

H h

Page 523

466

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

script and could not therefore have been generally available, but

others were translated into Latin and Hebrew, and one can still read

Averroës' Commentary on Aristotle's 'De anima', translated into

Latin by Michael Scot, and benefit from what he tells us concerning

the teachings of the Stagirite, including the theory of the spherical

propagation of sound.

Two compendia of the arts and sciences, De scientiis by Alphara-

bius (Al-Fārābī) and De ortu scientiarum, both translated from the

Arabic, became textbooks in European educational institutions, as

did dozens of other Latin translations from the Arabic. We find

quotations from, or references to, both these textbooks in the

writings of Gundisalvus, Magister Lambert (Pseudo-Aristotle), Vin-

cent de Beauvais, Roger Bacon, Jerome of Moravia, Walter Oding-

ton, and others.1 Such works would probably urge scholars to seek

the more extensive writings of Muslim authors for wider information;

and even supposing that some of these were available only in Arabic,

the mere fact that the Muslims and Mozárabes of Spain were using

them must have produced some benefit, even though it came orally.

In the Islamic colleges in Spain, music was part of the 'science of

mathematics', as in the Islamic East,2 although the mysterious

Virgilius Cordubensis would have us believe that it was a separate

study at Toledo.3 We know from Ibn al-Hijārī (d. 1194) that 'students

from all parts of the world flocked . . . to learn the sciences of which

Cordova was the most noble repository, and to derive knowledge

from the doctors and 'ulamā who swarmed in it'.4 There was good

reason for the fame of the Islamic schools. Anthony à Wood tells us

that Roger Bacon, using faulty Latin translations from the Arabic

in lecturing to students at Oxford, was ridiculed by those who came

from Spain, evidently because they knew the originals.5 Indeed both

Bacon and Adelard of Bath recommended students to forsake the

European schools for those of the Muslims. Yet, although the

potentialities of Islamic influence on European musical theory were

considerable, especially in view of the unmistakable proofs of in-

fluence in the other sciences of the quadrivium,6 the fact is that, beyond

the quotations made by European theorists from Alpharabius, and

1 See Farmer, Al-Fārābī's Arabic-Latin Writers on Music (Glasgow, 1934), where the

question is fully discussed.

2 F. Dieterici, op. cit., pp. 1-2; E. Werner and I. Sonne, op. cit., pp. 269-72.

3 Farmer, Historical Facts, p. 341.

4 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit., i, p. 30.

5 J. S. Brewer, F. Rogeri Bacon: Opera quaedam hactenus inedita (London, 1859),

i, p. lxxxvii; J. B. Trend, The Civilization of Spain (London, 1944), pp. 45-46.

6 T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, op. cit., pp. 344-54, 376-97.

Page 524

THE INFLUENCE

467

the mere scraps on music and therapeutics from Alkindus, Haly, Avicenna, and Constantine the African,1 we have little positive evidence.

We have already seen the universality of the practical art among Muslims everywhere, and under their domination in European lands the same inordinate love of music sprang up among the Christian population. Some Christian rulers adorned their courts with Oriental musicians.2 It was the same with the people at large, who would gather at the zambra (Ar. zumra) or festival, where they took delight in the new-fangled caña (ghaniyya), huda (hudā'), anaxir (nashīd), and the leile (laila), to become delirious with rapture as they listened to an exotic aravia or mourisca, whose very names tell of their paternity.

That some of this Oriental art had infiltrated quite early into the north is evident from iconography, as we see in the instruments delineated in the St. Médard Evangeliarium (eighth century), the Psalterium Aureum (ninth century), and elsewhere.3 Much of this may have been due to emigrant Mozárabes,4 although the real disseminators were the minstrel class, whose showy habiliments, painted faces, and long hair, which were the mark of the Oriental minstrel,5 had already been borrowed. The Spanish word mascara, like the English 'masker' (play actor), was derived from the Arabic maskhara (buffoon). The hobby-horse and grelots were part of the impedimenta of the morris dancers, alias 'Moorish Dancers', who were still painting their faces like the 'Moors' in the time of Thoinot Arbeau (1589). The hobby-horse (kurraj) and its bells (jalājil) are mentioned by Jarīr (d. c. 728), and is described among the Moors of North Africa by Ibn Khaldūn (d. 1406), and its Basque descendant, the zamalzain, is simply the Arabic zāmil al-zain ('gala limping horse').

What were the new arts which these minstrels spread abroad? Firstly, there were some novel Arab-Persian instruments of Spain, the best verbal display of which, although rather late, occurs in the fourteenth-century Libro de buen amor,6 while we have delineations of them a century earlier in the Cantigas de Santa María.7 Among

1 Farmer, Al-Fārābī's Arabic-Latin Writings on Music, pp. 32, 50.

2 Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 157-8. Grove's Dictionary of Music, v (London, 1954), p. 870.

3 R. Mitjana, 'La Musique en Espagne', in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie, 1re partie, iv (1920), p. 1928; J. Riaño, op. cit., p. 109; Kinsky, Geschichte der Musik in Bildern (Leipzig, 1929), pp. 35, fig. 1; 39, fig. 3.

4 G. T. Rivoira, Moslem Architecture (London, 1918), pp. 231, 284, 346.

5 Al-Maqqarī, op. cit. ii, p. 108; Al-Iṣfahānī, op. cit. ii, p. 174; Alf laila wa laila, iv (Calcutta, 1839-42), p. 166.

6 Juan Ruiz, Il libro de buen amor (Toulouse, 1901), ll. 1251-7.

7 J. Riaño, Critical and Bibliographical Notes on Early Spanish Music (London, 1887), pp. 109-28; J. Ribera, La Música de las Cantigas (Madrid, 1922).

Page 525

468

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

them were the atambor (aṭ-ṭunbūr), guitarra morisca (kaitāra 'arabiyya),

laud (al-‘ūd), rabé (rabāb), canon (qānūn), sonajas de azofar (ṣunūj aṣ-

ṣufr), axabeba (ash-shabbāba), annafil (an-nafīr), atabal (aṭ-ṭabl),

as well as the albogon (al-būq). Many of these, together with their

names, spread throughout Europe, the lute, rybybe, canon, tabor, as

well as the naker (naqqāra), finding acceptance in Britain. The Spanish

laud and atambor, as well as the guitarra morisca, were among the

novelties, as was the bowed rabé.1 The first named were especially

interesting since their necks were fitted with frets (dasātīn) discreetly

measured so as to give the Pythagorean scale, which was common to

both Muslim and Christian. Prior to this Europeans had only the

rote and harp among stringed instruments, and had only their ears

to guide them in tuning. All this was altered by the introduction of

instruments with fretted necks. The existence of this Arab-Persian

device of frets on the lute was once doubted,2 but the objection has

been completely disproved.3

It may have been from the Islamic lute that western Europe re-

ceived an alphabetic notation for practical purposes,4 as we see in

Hucbald’s De harmonica institutione,5 although we get no definite

proof of Muslim influence in this respect until later when, in a Latin

work on the Ars de pulsatione lambuti et aliorum similium instru-

mentorum, dated 1496–7, it is admitted that the tablature mentioned

was invented by ‘a Moor of the Kingdom of Granada’.6 Although

the Conde de Morphy considered that the Spanish lute tablature was

only ‘probably of Oriental origin’, his assessor, the more erudite

Gevaert, had little doubt that the Castilians and Aragonese ‘elabor-

ated their tablature in imitation of that of the Muslims’.7

What else emerged out of Islamic practice or theory is not always

patent. Odo of Cluny (d. 942), in his section on the eight tones,

annexes to the chordae names which have a decidedly Semitic

physiognomy, three of them being Arabic, schembs (Ar. shams =

‘sun’), caemar (qamar = ‘moon’), and nar (nār = ‘fire’),8 all of

which appears to have a raison d’être in the doctrine of the ethos, as

1 For all these instruments see Grove’s Dictionary of Music (London, 1954), s.v.

2 Karl Geiringer, ‘Vorgeschichte und Geschichte der europäischen Laute’, Zeit-

schrift für Musikwissenschaft, x (1928), p. 570; C. Sachs, The History of Musical Instru-

ments, p. 254. The singular of dasātīn (frets) is dastān.

3 Farmer, Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, ii (1939), pp. 61–68.

4 Farmer, An Old Moorish Lute Tutor, pp. 25–26.

5 Gerbert, op. cit. i, p. 118.

6 Jaime Villanueva, Viage literario a las Iglesias de España (Valencia, 1821), xi.

7 Morphy, Les Luthistes espagnols du XVIe siècle (Leipzig, 1902), pp. xi, xvii.

8 Gerbert, op. cit. i, pp. 249–50. Cf. P.Wagner, Neumenkunde Leipzig (1912), pp. 105,

Page 526

THE INFLUENCE

469

in the Islamic melodic modes and the Syrian oktoechos.1 Of the parts played by Gerbert of Aurillac (d. 1003), Hermannus Contractus (d. 1054), Constantine the African (d. 1087), and Alfred the Englishman (thirteenth century),2 all of whom were connected with music and had contact with Islamic culture, we know but little, and yet this little is extremely suggestive. Indeed one lights upon a number of allusive points. Is it not strange, for example, that such words as conductus, estribillo, and stanza, should be identical in their pristine significance as in their artistic meaning with the Arabic majrā, maṭla‘ or markaz, and bait? The conductus3 was a form which, in spite of its later ecclesiastical harbouring, had a secular upbringing as a song form, and Anglès has recognized specimens as early as the ninth century.4 Yet outside the philological closeness of meaning we know of no musical identity between the Latin conductus and the Arabian majrā. Some of the conducti have the forms of the rondeau and ballade, which were within the ken of the troubadours, who may not have been the inventors of the gaya ciencia, since we have yet to discover where these people found this art,5 although both their verse and their lives tell much of Spain.6 J. B. Trend has suggested that they ‘really derived much of their sense of form, and even their subject matter, from the Spanish Muslims’,7 and their name certainly reminds one of the Arabic ṭarrāb (minstrel),8 a hint which has not passed unnoticed.9

It has long been speculated that when the Spaniards took the verse and rhyme in the songs of the Arabs, as they did in the villancico, they may also have adopted the music as well. This is quite understandable when we realize that it was often the stroke of the plectrum on the Islamic lute or pandore which enhanced the characteristic rhythm of the song. It was for that reason that the Arcipreste de Hita (fourteenth century) insisted that some instruments were inseparable from certain types of songs, and pointed out that the Spanish vihuela de arco, cinfonie, and the like, were alien to Arabian music, e.g. in the song called ‘Caguil hallaco’.10 Certainly one of the

1 Farmer, The Influence of Music, pp. 97–101, 105–7, 111; J. Jeannin, ‘Le chant liturgique syrien’, Journal asiatique, Sér. X, 20 (1912), pp. 330–3.

2 Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 32–37, 177–186.

3 See Vol. II, pp. 171–4.

4 El Còdex musical de las Huelgas (Música a veus dels segles XIII–XIV), i (Barcelona, 1931), p. 25.

5 Jean Beck, La Musique des troubadours (Paris, 1910), p. 67.

6 J. Anglade, Les Troubadours (Paris, 1908), p. 252.

7 The Music of Spanish History (New York, 1926), p. 30.

8 Julian Ribera, Historia de la música arabe (Madrid, 1927), p. 335.

9 T. Arnold and A. Guillaume, op. cit., pp. 17, 373.

10 Juan Ruiz, op. cit., ll. 1516–17.

Page 527

470

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

intrinsic features of Islamic music which affected Spain, and even

countries beyond, was the melisma or 'gloss' (zaida), which J. B.

Trend has graphically likened to arabesques in Mudéjar art. Indeed

he suggests that 'the Moorish contribution to Spanish music . . . is

the Mudéjar style, that is, a manner of performance rather than a

type of musical construction',1 an opinion with which most people

will agree.2

At the same time there are strong reasons for believing that

western Europe owes something to the Muslim theorists and prac-

titioners in the sphere of rhythm. This was what Julian Ribera,

the Spanish protagonist of Islamic influence, believed, although he

built up his thesis on false premises. He amassed a splendid array of

literary evidence on the Islamic influence in general which was fairly

convincing,3 but his testimony from musical sources, the Cantigas de

Santa Maria, was less telling. It may be true that the Arabic zajal is

the parent of the virelai and ballade (perhaps even of the rondeau),

and that they may be found in the Cantigas, but it does not necessarily

follow that the music is of the same origin.4 It has been urged against

Ribera's thesis that there are no confirmatory Arabic musical docu-

ments. That may be passably true, since it has been shown (p. 453)

that these do not exist before the mid-thirteenth century, yet the

argumentum ex silentio is proverbially inconclusive. The real case

against Ribera is his erroneous transcription of the rhythmic

modes of the classical Arabic authorities, which considerably

invalidates his versions of the Cantigas and of the music of the

troubadours.5

In 1925, independently of Ribera, certain other clues for possible

Islamic influence on medieval European mensuralists were brought

forward.6 It was demonstrated that there were references in the Latin

treatise by the so-called Anonymus IV (late thirteenth century) to

new mensural note-values which bore such Arabic names as elmuah-

hym and elmuarifa,7 and that Johannes de Muris (post 1325) described

another notated device called the alentradé, also of seemingly Arabic

1 Op. cit., p. 36.

2 Farmer, Historical Facts, p. 157.

3 Ribera, La Música de las Cantigas, pp. 95 ff.; Music in Ancient Arabia, pp. 177 ff.

4 Gustave Reese, Music in the Middle Ages (New York, 1940), pp. 245–7, where the

pros and cons of 'Islamic influence' are fairly presented.

5 Farmer, Sa'adyah Gaon on the Influence of Music (London, 1943), pp. 78–87.

6 Farmer, 'Clues for the Arabian Musical Influence', Journal of the Royal Asiatic

Society, 1925, pp. 61–80 = The Arabian Influence on Musical Theory (London, 1925)

issued separately.

7 E. de Coussemaker, Scriptores de musica medii aevi, (Paris, 1864), pp.

339–341.

Page 528

THE INFLUENCE

471

origin.1 The two former were counted among the currentes or 'running notes' to which Gustave Reese has drawn attention in the melodies of Léonin of Paris, that same optimus organista praised by Anonymus IV.2 It was also suggested that the musical term ochetus (hoquetus) was derived from the Arabic iqā‘āt (rhythms), just as Avicenna is made to speak in the Latin Canon of Medicine of hash, which is the Arabic 'ishq. Muslim rhythm was one of the features of the Oriental art that was quite novel to Europe, which listened in wonderment to a singer in one rhythm while the accompanying instrumentalist played in another. So far, only two musicologists have recognized these hints of 1925.3 Of course, it may be that these Arabisms crept in through some Mozarabian scribe; yet why should one have used Arabic if there had been a Latin term available? Anonymus IV was certainly well acquainted with Spanish and Pamplona manuscripts on musical theory.4

If so many things are hidden from us in this vexed question of Islamic influence, there are a few which are not. One can safely say, for instance, that the old notion that we owed our syllables of solfeggio to an Arabic source is quite unlikely, although even the more accepted origin may be very doubtful.5 That the Muslims practised harmony, in our connotation of the term, as stated at length by Julian Ribera, is quite erroneous. That they permitted devices known as the tarkībāt, i.e. the simultaneous striking of the fourth, fifth, or octave with other notes, is true enough, but this was only an infrequent decoration (zaida) of the melody. 'In view of their practice of the tarkībāt', it may be asked, 'how was it that the Muslims did not develop harmony?' The answer is that, in our Middle Ages, the Muslims knew of the principles of harmony, in the Greek sense of harmonia,6 better than Europe did, but they viewed the laws of 'harmonia' horizontally, and continued to do so, whereas Europe, since the tenth century, has apprehended a vertical harmony. The Muslims have advanced in their horizontal harmonia as much as the European west has developed in its vertical harmony, while in another sphere they have outstripped the Europeans, in the 'heartbeats of God', as the infinite, boundless, rhythms of the Muslims have been called.7

1 Ibid., ii, p. 419.

2 Ibid., i, p. 342; Reese, op. cit., p. 298.

3 J. B. Trend in The Legacy of Islam, p. 18; Reese, op. cit., p. 321. See G. Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science, ii (Washington, 1931), p. 25.

4 E. de Coussemaker, op. cit. i, p. 345.

5 Farmer, Historical Facts, pp. 72–82.

6 See pp. 340 ff.

7 See Farmer, 'What is Arabian Music?' Oriental Studies: Mainly Musical (London, 1953), pp. 53–58.

Page 529

472

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

On the other hand, some Islamic peoples have advanced beyond the use of simultaneous fourths, fifths, and octaves merely as occasional fioriture, as the present writer has shown elsewhere.1 Uspensky and Belaiev, in their Turkmenskaya Muzyka (Moscow, 1928), have given innumerable examples of the normal music of Turkomanian peoples which reveal the widespread use of consecutive fourths and fifths, in a way identical with the organum of medieval Europe. Belaiev, in dealing with the folk-music of Georgia—where he found the same technique—would have us believe that this feature antedates the organum of Europe and says that ‘Europe did not invent it but acquired it elsewhere in a ready-made form’.2 The present writer had merely hinted at the probability that the ‘rudimentary tarkīb’ of Islamic peoples was the ‘forerunner of the European organum’, where-as Belaiev voices a certainty.3 Laurence Picken4 has made comparable studies in rural Turkey where he found similar features to those of Uspensky and Belaiev in Turkestan. Their occurrence in Asia Minor, says Picken, shows ‘that . . . the practice of parallel fourths and fifths can exist side by side with more or less sophisticated homophony’ which is the norm in most Islamic lands. Like Belaiev5 Picken favours an indigenous origin for this early polyphony, i.e. organum, and suggests that since ‘long-necked lutes’, i.e. pandores, ‘have great antiquity’ in that area, we cannot rule out the possibility that ‘the ancient Hittite lutes (first millennium B.C.) should not have been played polyphonically’. Yet the fact remains that we have no documentary evidence of organum among any peoples of Islam before comparatively modern times, and that the use of simultaneous fourths, fifths, and octaves, was not known to them earlier than the ninth century A.D., and even then only occasionally as fioriture.

On the question of Moorish influence in Spain the Spaniards themselves are not in complete accord.6 If such authors as Menéndez y Pelayo7 and Mitjana y Gordan8 recognize that influence, some of the musicians, notably Pedrell and Falla, do not. Pedrell avers that Spanish music ‘has absorbed no influence from the Arabs’:

1 ‘Turkestani Music’, Grove’s Dictionary of Music, viii, 1954.

2 ‘The Folk-Music of Georgia’, Musical Quarterly, ix (1933), p. 417.

3 See Farmer, Historical Facts, p. 112

4 ‘Instrumental Polyphonic Folk-Music in Asia Minor’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 1953–4, pp. 73 ff.

5 Christian Science Monitor, 8 Sept. 1927.

6 See Farmer, ‘Moorish Music’, especially the bibliography, Grove’s Dictionary of Music, v (London, 1954), pp. 868–76.

7 Antología de poetas líricos, ii (Madrid, 1903), p. 68.

8 ‘La Musique en Espagne’, in Lavignac and La Laurencie, Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie, iv, p. 1925.

Page 530

THE INFLUENCE

473

although on another page he expresses less certainty when he says

that it 'owes nothing essential to the Arabs or Moors',1 a statement

which loses its conviction unless we know what he considered to

be 'essential'. Pedrell would trace the orientalism in Spanish music to

the Byzantine period, but does not produce that 'documentary

evidence' which is always demanded from those who claim a Moorish

influence. Falla, whilst admitting the oriental stratum in Spanish

folk music, attributes some of it to the gipsies, seemingly because

of the word flamenco, a term which, like canto jondo, is not a

century old. Trend has dealt at considerable length with the views of

Falla on this gipsy influence in his Manuel de Falla and Spanish

Music (New York, 1929). Yet one is constrained to ask whether there

is such a thing as gipsy music per se? The latter, like gipsy religion, is,

to a considerable extent, determined by the culture and beliefs of the

land in which the gipsy abides. If gipsy music exists, how is it that it

has not influenced the music of Poland and Italy where there have

been such large settlements of gipsies? Not that the flamenco, canto

jondo, or siguiriya gitana reveal—in the contour of the melody or the

swing of the rhythm—any clearly cut Moorish or Arabian features:

since it is more the circumjacence, especially in the 'manner of

performance', as Trend so acutely observes, which displays those

elements.2 In these latter, we must inevitably allow, as Raoul

Laparra has said, that 'the origin of this mentalité of the flamenco

goes back to the domination of the Moors in the Iberian penin-

sula'.3

During the past two decades there has been a marked change of

view on the question of the Arabian or Moorish influence, although

that modification has been mainly on the literary rather than the

music claims. Yet a few are still adamant. While Isabel Pope thinks

that the melodies of the Cantigas de Santa Maria 'display the in-

fluence of the Church combined with the influence of the folk song,

both European and Oriental,'4 Higini Anglès still holds an opposite

view; he states that in the 423 melodies of the Cantigas he found not

the slightest trace of Arabian influence.5 Jeanroy, on the other hand,

who in 1899 had said that the Arabian hypothesis was 'a pure

legend', had been compelled to confess in 1934 that 'it is no longer

1 Cancionero musical popular español, i (Valls, 1919), pp. 69, 84.

2 J. B. Trend, The Music of Spanish History (Oxford, 1926), pp. 33-37.

3 R. Laparra, 'La Musique et la danse populaires en Espagne', Lavignac and La Laurencie, op. cit. iv, pp. 2394 ff.

4 Annales musicologiques, ii (Paris, 1954), p. 212.

5 Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ii (Kassel, 1952), col. 777.

Page 531

474

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

possible to dismiss the hypothesis by a negation pure and simple'.1

That admission had been forced on him by the researches of a new

generation of scholars, many of whom were not only competent in

Romance literature but in Arabic. The several works of Alois R.

Nykl1 had placed the problem on 'a solid basis',2 and those who

had sneered at Ribera now found that later Spanish Arabists of

the standing of A. González Palencia3 and E. García Gómez

were supporting some of the theses of the older Arabist. The tempo

of acceptance was speeded after the appearance of R. Menéndez

Pidal's Poesía árabe y poesía europea (1938-41)4 and later works.5

Then followed the troubadour studies of Gustave Cohen,6 Nykl,7

and Henri Pérès,8 while the contributions of Samuel Stern,9

Dámaso Alonso,10 and Leo Spitzer11 on the Mozarabic lyric—

Arabic and Hebrew—shed further light on the subject.

The question of the Arabic kharja, i.e. the coda strophe in

Oriental and Romance poetry, which had been raised by Stern,

was emphasized by E. García Gómez,12 and it still exists, as a

musical feature, in the Moroccan khurūj.13 One of the most in-

teresting discoveries was that of Lévi-Provençal who, in 1954,

demonstrated in a most positive way that Chanson V in Jeanroy's

Les Chansons de Guillaume IX was not only wrongly transcribed

but that it contained in its coda four lines of undiluted Arabic.14

1 Revue des Deux Mondes, 151 (1899), p. 351. La Poésie lyrique des troubadours, ii

(Toulouse, 1934), p. 368.

2 The Dove's Neck-lace (Paris, 1931); El cancionero de Abén Guzmán (Madrid, 1933).

3 'La Poesía arábigo andaluza y su influencia', Revista Hispánica Moderna, i (New

York, 1934).

4 Published in Bulletin hispanique, xl (1938), and in 1941, with other studies, at

Madrid.

5 Cantos románicos andalusíes (Madrid, 1950), 'Les origines de las literaturas

románicas', Filologia romanza, i (Turin, 1954).

6 'Le Problème des origines arabes de la poésie provençale medievale', Bulletin de

la classe des lettres . . . de l'Académie royal de Belgique, 5e série, xxxii (1946).

7 'The latest in Troubadour studies', Archivum Romanticum, xix (Florence, 1935);

L'influence arabe-andalouse sur les Troubadours', Bulletin hispanique, xli (Bordeaux,

1939); Hispano-Arabic Poetry in its Relation with the Old Provençal Troubadours

(Baltimore, 1946); Speculum, xxvi (1951), pp. 179-84.

8 'La Poésie arabe d'Andalusie et ses relations possibles avec la poésie des trouba-

dours', L'Islam et l'Occident, Cahiers du Sud (1947).

9 'Les Vers finaux en espagnol dans les muwaššahas hispano-hébraïques', Al-

Andalus, xiii (1948); Les Chansons mozarabes (Palermo, 1953).

10 'Cancioncillos De Amigo Mozarabes', Revista de Filologia Española, xxxiii (1949).

11 'The Mozarabe lyric', Contemporary Literature (Oregon, 1952).

12 'Sobre un posible tercer tipo de poesía arábigo-andaluza', Estudios dedicados a

Menéndez Pidal (Madrid, 1951); Al-Andalus, xvii (1952), pp. 57–127; ibid., xviii (1953),

pp. 138–9; ibid., xix (1954), pp. 43–52.

13 A. Chottin, Corpus de musique marocaine, i (Paris, 1931), p. 8.

14 'Les Vers arabes de la Chanson V de Guillaume IX d'Aquitaine', Arabica, i

(Leiden, 1954).

Page 532

THE INFLUENCE

475

From this we see that the oldest of the French troubadours not only came in touch with Eastern Oriental culture during the Crusades, but with the more potent civilization of Muslim Spain. How much the troubadours could have been influenced from the south is brilliantly revealed in an article entitled 'Concerning the Accessibility of Arabian Influence to the Earliest Provençal Troubadours' by A. J. Denomy.1 For the latest opinions on the question of the Arabian influence see Pierre Le Gentil's Le Virelai et le villancico: Le problème des origines arabes (Paris, 1954), and Ettore Li Gotti's La 'Tesa araba' sulle 'Origini' della lirica romanza (Palermo, 1955).

On the terrain of actual examples of Arabian or Moorish music of the Middle Ages little has been revealed since the present writer called attention to existing examples in 1929,2 although a recent writer, Isabel Pope, still believes that 'no examples . . . are known to survive'.3 In 1929, however, a doubtful attempt was made by Clifton J. Furness to solve the identity of a piece of thirteenth-century music which was considered by Bourdillon to have been originally 'an Arabian or Moorish chant'.4 The article by Furness was entitled 'The Interpretation and Probable Derivation of the Musical Notation in the Aucassin et Nicolette MS.'.5 After having heard Tunisian music, in which a man and a boy performed a similar chante-fable, he concluded that it was no different from the type of performance which has been considered to have been practised in the Aucassin et Nicolette recital. His account was on all fours with that which Bourdillon,6 Gaston Paris,7 and Walter Pater8 had pictured. He even went so far as to identify the scale of the thirteenth-century music with the Algerian jahārka mode which he found in the present writer's version of F. Salvador Daniel's La Musique arabe (1863).9 The latter says that it was identical with the Aeolian mode, but his example in the song of the Banī 'Abbās, notated in the book quoted, shows that it was the Mixolydian, which would equate with the Muṭlaq fī majrā al-binṣir mode of Baghdād and Cordoba of old. Unfortunately the

1 Mediaeval Studies, xv (Toronto, 1953).

2 History of Arabian Music (1929), p. 203 and pl. 3.

3 Annales Musicologiques, ii, p. 212.

4 F. W. Bourdillon, Aucassin et Nicolette (Manchester, 1919), p. xxxi.

5 The Modern Language Review, xxiv (Cambridge, 1929).6 Op. cit., p. xxxi.

7 Poèmes et légendes du Moyen Âge (Paris, 1900), pp. 101-2.

8 The Renaissance, i (of Works, London, 1900), p. 16.

9 The Music and Musical Instruments of the Arab (London, 1915), pp. 99 (not 93), 210-12.

Page 533

476

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

name jahārka—in relation to a mode—was unknown in the Maghrib before the opening of the sixteenth century, although it was used in the Near East from the fifteenth century.1 There is no jahārka mode—by name—in Tunisia,2 but in Egypt it is practically identical with our major mode.3 On the other hand there is obviously nothing particularly Oriental about the mode itself, although the airs of Aucassin and Nicolette may have Oriental features. Strange as it may seem, an unusual—although only partial—confirmation of the latter appeared in that same year, 1929, when Arnold Dolmetsch undertook a musical pilgrimage to Morocco where he frequented native musical assemblies.4 On one such occasion he was asked to play something on the lute from his own land. Among other items which he and his son Carl played in response to that invitation was the music of Aucassin et Nicolette. The old blind Moorish lutenist who led the native musicians hailed the music with delight saying, ‘I know that tune, only we would embroider it thus’. The item was then performed in the Moorish way, which was, as Mrs. Mabel Dolmetsch put it, ‘what we would call divisions on a ground’, although the latter did not suspect that the term ‘divisions’(taqāsim) had been favoured by Arabic-speaking peoples for centuries before Simpson issued his Division Violin (1659), and the taqsīm is still the most favoured instrumental form in the Near East.5

More important was a discovery by the distinguished Arabist Louis Massignon in 1949.6 This was reported by Isabel Pope to be ‘a collection of Arabic music with notation’7 found in two manuscripts of the Andalusian poet Al-Shushtarī (d. 1269) at Aleppo and Cairo. It would appear, however, that these latter, neither of them very old copies, simply show some of the songs rubricated with the names of the modes, i.e. the talāhin (melodic modes or ‘patterns’) and the ḍurūb (rhythmic modes) to which they were sung. Among the former are some very old names, e.g. ‘irāq, ḥijāz, husainī, and ‘ushshāq, although others, such as dūka, sīka, and jahārka, were scarcely known in Al-Shushtarī’s day. Yet we know, on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbād al-Nafzī (d. 1390), that music had been set to these verses.8 Since by that time all of the above

1 R. d'Erlanger, La Musique arabe, iv, pp. 133–4.

2 Ibid., v, figs. 144–7.

3 A. Chottin, Tableau de la musique marocaine (Paris, 1939), p. 181.

4 Letter from Mrs. Dolmetsch, 22 January 1930; The Consort, Dec. (1931), p. 13.

5 Recueil des travaux au Congrès de Musique arabe (Cairo, 1934), pp. 112–13, 170.

Cf. The History of Music in Sound, i, side 16.

6 ‘Investigaciones sobre Šuštarī’, Al-Andalus, xiv (1949).

7 Annales musicologiques, ii, p. 214.

8 Encyclopaedia of Islam (Leiden, 1913–38), iv, 393.

Page 534

modes had become melody ‘patterns’ we can form as general an idea

of the contour of the melodies of Al-Shushtarī's muwashshahāt as

of that of neum-written music of the early Christian Church.

Whatever may be our certainties and doubts concerning the extent

of Islamic influence on European culture, we must remember that for

700 years at least it was the Muslims and Mozárabes of Spain who,

in the earlier centuries undoubtedly, ‘alone held the torch of learning

and civilization bright and shining before the western world’,1 and

it was this glow that helped to light the way for Europe's progress in

music.

1 S. Lane-Poole, The Moors in Spain (London, 1890), p. 43.

Page 536

BIBLIOGRAPHY

GENERAL

Ambros, A. W.: 'Die Musik der Culturvölker des Orients', 'Die Musik bei den Naturvölkern'. Geschichte der Musik. 3rd edition, edited by B. von Soko-lowsky, i (Leipzig, 1887), pp. 341–567.

Behn, F.: Musikleben im Altertum und frühen Mittelalter (Stuttgart, 1954).

Combarieu, Jules: Musique et la magie. Étude sur les origines populaires de l'art musical, son influence, et sa fonction dans les sociétés (Paris, 1909).

Hornbostel, E. M. von: 'Melodie und Skala'. Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, xix (1912), pp. 11–23.

— 'Die Probleme der vergleichenden Musikwissenschaft'. Zeitschrift der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, vii (1905/6), pp. 85–97.

Kunst, Jaap: Ethno-Musicology. A study of its nature, its problems, methods and representative personalities (The Hague, 1955).

Lach, R.: Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der ornamentalen Melopöie (Leipzig, 1913).

Lachmann, R.: 'Musik der außereuropäischen Natur- und Kulturvölker', in Bücken, Handbuch der Musikwissenschaft (Potsdam, 1931).

— Musik des Orients (Breslau, 1929).

Lavignac, A., and La Laurencie, L.: Encyclopédie de la musique, 1re partie i and v (Paris, 1913 and 1922).

Sachs, C.: 'Die Musik der Antike' in Bücken, Handbuch der Musikwissenschaft (Potsdam, 1932).

— Musik des Altertums (Breslau, 1924).

— The History of Musical Instruments (New York, 1940).

— The Rise of Music in the Ancient World (New York, 1943).

Schaeffner, P. A.: Les Origines des instruments de musique (Paris, 1936).

Schneider, M.: Geschichte der Mehrstimmigkeit. I. Die Naturvölker (Berlin, 1934).

Wallaschek, R.: Primitive Music (London, 1893).

Wellesz, E. 'Probleme der musikalischen Orientforschung'. Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, xxiv (1917), pp. 1–18.

CHAPTER I

PRIMITIVE MUSIC

(i) Ethnology

Arndt, R. F. W.: 'Die Religion der Nad'a'. Anthropos, xxvi (1931).

Bächtold-Stäubli, H.: Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens, v (Berlin, 1932/3).

Baumann, H.: 'Afrikanische Wild- und Buschgeister'. Zeitschrift für Ethno-logie, lxx (1938).

Beecham, J.: The Ashanti (London, 1841).

Brown, A. R.: The Andaman Islanders (London, 1933).

Bücher, K.: Arbeit und Rhythmus (Sitzungsberichte d. Kgl. Sächsischen Gesell-schaft d. Wissenschaften. Leipzig, 1896. 6th edition, 1924).

Codrington, R. H.: The Melanesians, vii (Oxford, 1891).

Eboué, M.: Les Peuples du Ouranghi-Chari (Paris, 1933).

Page 537

480

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Emsheimer, E.: 'Zur Ideologie der lappischen Zaubertrommel'. Ethnos, ix (1944).

Frobenius, L.: Spielmannsgeschichten der Sahel (Jena, 1921).

Fuhrmann, E.: Tlinkit und Haida (Hagen, 1923).

Granet, M.: Danses et légendes de la Chine ancienne, i (Paris, 1926).

Herzog, G.: 'Speech Melody and Primitive Music'. Musical Quarterly, xx (1934).

Hewitt, J. N. B.: 'Orenda'. American Anthropology, iv (1902).

Koch, K.: 'Totemismus und Zweiklassenkultur in Neu-Guinea'. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, lxxi (1931).

Leenhardt, M.: Arts de l'Océanie (Paris, 1947).

Menges, L., and Potapov, P.: Materialien zur Volkskunde der Turkvölker des Altay (Mitteilungen des Seminars für orientalische Sprachen) (Berlin, 1934).

Menghin, O.: Geschichte der Steinzeit (Vienna, 1931).

Preuss, Th.: Religion und Mythologie der Uitoto (Leipzig, 1921).

—— Die Nayarit-expedition, i (Leipzig, 1912).

Rattray, R. S.: The Ashanti (Oxford, 1923).

—— Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, vi (Cambridge, 1908).

Schaeffner, P. A.: 'Zur Initiation im Wagi Tal (Bismarck Archipelago)'. Anthropos, xxxiii (1938).

Schmidt, J. G.: 'Neue Beiträge zur Ethnologie der Nor-Papuas'. Anthropos, xxviii (1933).

Strehlow, C.: Die Aranda und Loritjastämme (Frankfurt, 1907).

Stumpf, C.: 'Musikpsychologie in England'. Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft, i (1885).

Westermann, D.: 'So, der Gewittergott der Ewe'. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, lxx (1938).

Wirz, P.: Die Marind-anim, i (Hamburg, 1922).

(ii) Books and Articles on general features of Primitive Music

Biblioteca Canaria: El lenguaje silbado en la Gomera.

Danckert, Werner: 'Musikwissenschaft und Kulturkreislehre', Anthropos, xxxii (1937).

Dincser, O.: Die Probleme der Varianten in der Musikforschung (Geneva, 1947).

Heinitz, W.: 'Probleme der afrikanischen Trommelsprache', Beiträge zur Kolonial-forschung, iv (1942).

Hornbostel, E. M. von: 'Musikalische Tonsysteme', in Geiger and Scheel, Handbuch der Physik, viii (Berlin, 1927).

Labouret, H.: 'Le Langage tambouriné et sifflé'. Bulletin du comité d'études de l'Afrique occidentale française (1923).

Lach, R.: Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der ornamentalen Melopöie (Leipzig, 1913).

—— 'Die vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, ihre Methoden und Probleme'. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Bd. 200 (Vienna, 1924).

Montandon, G.: La Généalogie des instruments de musique (Geneva, 1919).

Nadel, S.: Marimbamusik (Vienna, 1931).

Ricard, R.: A propos du langage sifflé des Canaris (Hesperis, 1932).

Sachs, Curt: Geist und Werden der Musikinstrumente (Berlin, 1929).

—— Handbuch der Musikinstrumentenkunde (Leipzig, 1920).

—— Reallexikon der Musikinstrumente (Berlin, 1913).

Schneider, M.: El origen musical de los animales símbolos (Barcelona, 1946).

—— 'Wandernde Melodien'. Archiv für Musikforschung, iii (1938).

Page 538

BIBLIOGRAPHY

481

Schneider, M.: 'Ethnologische Musikforschung', in Preuss and Trimborn, Lehrbuch der Völkerkunde (2nd edition, Stuttgart, 1956).

— La Danza de espadas y la tarantela (Barcelona, 1948).

— 'Los Cantos de lluvia'. Anuario musical, iv (1949).

— 'Die Bedeutung der Stimme in den alten Kulturen'. Tribus (Jahrbuch des Lindenmuseums), ii-iii (Stuttgart, 1953).

— Singende Steine (Kassel, 1955).

— La Philosophie de la musique chez les peuples non européens (Paris, 1956).

— 'Die historischen Grundlagen der musikalischen Symbolik'. Die Musikforschung, iv (1951).

Stumpf, C.: Die Anfänge der Musik (Leipzig, 1911).

Wallaschek, R.: Primitive Music (London, 1893).

(iii) Books and Articles on the Music of particular Peoples or Regions

d'Angulo, J., and d'Harcourt, E.: 'La Musique des Indiens de la Californie du Nord'. Journal des Américanistes, xxiii (1931).

Belaiev, V.: 'The Folk-Music of Georgia'. The Musical Quarterly, xix (1933).

Densmore, Frances: Chippewa Music (Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 45) (Washington, 1910).

— Nootka and Quileute Music (Bulletin 124) (Washington, 1939).

— Mandan and Hidatsa Music (Bulletin 80) (Washington, 1923).

— Papago Music (Bulletin 90) (Washington, 1929).

— Music of the Indians of British Columbia (Bulletin 136) (Washington, 1943).

— Pawnee Music (Bulletin 93) (Washington, 1929).

— Menominee Music (Bulletin 102) (Washington, 1932).

Emsheimer, E.: 'Schamanentrommel und Trommelbau'. Ethnos ix (1946).

Hornbostel, E. M. von: 'Die Musik auf den Nordwestlichen Salomon Inseln'. R. Thurnwald, Forschungen auf den Salomon Inseln (Berlin, 1912).

Kirby, P.: 'The Musical Practices of the Bushmen'. Bantu Studies, x (1936).

— The Musical Instruments of the Native Races of South Africa (Oxford, 1936).

Kunst, J.: Music in Nias (Leiden, 1939).

— Music in Flores (Leiden, 1942).

Mayer, R. F. H.: 'Sonnenverehrung in Neu-Guinea'. Anthropos, xxviii (1933).

Schmidt, W.: 'Über Musik und Gesänge der Karesau-Papuas'. Kongress-bericht der internationalen Musikgesellschaft (Vienna, 1910).

Schneider, M.: 'Gesänge aus Uganda'. Archiv für Musikforschung, ii (1937).

— 'A propósito del influjo árabe'. Anuario Musical, i (1946).

— 'Lieder ägyptischer Bauern'. Festschrift für Kodály (Budapest, 1942).

— 'La Canción de cuna'. Anuario Musical, iii (1948).

— 'Phonetische u. metrische Korrelationen bei gesprochenen u. gesungenen Ewe Texten'. Archiv für vergleichende Phonetik (1941).

— 'La Relation entre la musique et le langage dans la chanson chinoise'. Anuario Musical, v (1950).

— 'Zambomba und Pandero'. Spanische Forschungen, i (1954).

— 'Über die Verbreitung afrikanischer Chorformen'. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, lxix (1937).

— 'Zur Trommelsprache der Duala'. Anthropos, xlvii (1952).

Speck, G.: Ceremonial Songs of the Creek and Yuchi Indians (Philadelphia, 1911).

Steinmann, A.: 'Über anthropomorphe Schlïztrommeln in Indonesien'. Anthropos, xxxiii (1938).

Tessmann, G.: Die Bubi auf Fernando Po (Darmstadt, 1923).

B 2608

Ii

Page 539

482

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Väisaenen, A. O.: Wogulische und ostjakische Melodien (Helsinki, 1937).

Wiora, W.: ‘Alpenländische Liedweisen der Frühzeit’. Festschrift für John Meier (Lahe, 1949).

Witte, P.: ‘Lieder und Gesänge der Ewe-Neger’. Anthropos, i (1906).

CHAPTER II

(Numbers in brackets, other than dates, refer to serial entries in the Glossary of Characters, p. 190. Entries not mentioned in the text are marked †.)

(a) SOURCES AND TRANSCRIPTIONS

Chen, C. H. and S. H.: The Flower Drum and other Chinese Songs (New York, 1943).

Chingshan Chynpuu (137) (1673).

Collection Pelliot, No. 3808, Bibliothèque nationale de France (a Tarng musical MS).

Graves, S. M., and Farley, M. F.: Min River Boat Songs (New York, 1946).

Jacobs, A. G.: The Chinese-American Song and Games Book (New York, 1944).

Jiang Kwei: Baishyr Dawren Gecheu, Syh Jiuan, Syhbuh Tsongkan (83) (Shanghai, 1929).

Ju Shii: Yilii Jingjuann Tongjiee Shyyueh Pian (110). Melodies for 12 of the Songs, reprinted in the Yueh Dean (168) of Hwang Tzuoo (1692).

Ju Tzayyuh: Yuehliuh Chyuanshu (85) (1595).

†Kornfeld, P. Fritz: Die tonale Struktur chinesischer Musik; St. Gabrieler Studien, 16 (Mödling bei Wien, 1955).

Liu Shya-an [sic]: Three Songs (Tokyo, 1935).

Ming Dawtzanq (167).

Ning Wang: Chyushian Shernchyi Mihpuu (135) (1425).

†Picken, L.: ‘Twelve Ritual Melodies of the T’ang Dynasty’. Studia Memoriae Belae Bartók Sacra (Budapest, 1956), pp. 147–73.

Shyong Pernglai: Sehpuu (198).

Wugaang Chynpuu (136) (1546).

(b) BOOKS AND ARTICLES

(* indicates presence of musical examples.)

*Aalst, J. van: Chinese Music (Shanghai, 1884).

*Amiot, Père: Mémoire sur la musique des Chinois tant anciens que modernes (Paris, 1779).

Bazin Ainé, A. P. L.: Théâtre chinois (Paris, 1838)

— Le Siècle des Youen (Paris, 1854).

*Bose, F.: Musikalische Völkerkunde (Freiburg i. Br., 1953).

*Chao Wei-pang: ‘Yang-ko, the Rural Theatre in Ting-hsien, Hopei’. Folklore Studies, iii (Peiping, 1944), pp. 17–40.

*Chiang Un-kai: K’ouen K’iu—le théâtre chinois ancien (Paris, 1932).

Courant, M.: La Langue chinoise parlée (Paris, 1914).

*—— ‘Essai sur la musique classique des Chinois avec un appendice relatif à la musique coréenne’. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 77–241.

Creel, H. G.: The Birth of China (New York, 1937), p. 99.

*Crossley-Holland, P. C.: ‘Chinese Music’. Grove’s Dictionary of Music and Musicians (ed. E. Blom), ii (London, 1954), pp. 219–48.

Page 540

*Dechevrens, A.: 'Étude sur le système musical chinois'. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, ii (1901), pp. 484–551.

Eastlake, F. W.: 'The "Sho" or Chinese Reed Organ'. China Review, xi (Hong Kong, 1882–3), pp. 33–41.

Eckardt, H.: 'Chinesische Musik, II. Vom Ende der Han-Zeit bis zum Ende der Sui-Zeit (220–618). Der Einbruch westlicher Musik'. Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ii (ed. F. Blume) (Kassel and Basel, 1952), cols. 1205–7: 'III. Die T'ang-Zeit (618–907). Die Rolle der westländischer (Hu-) Musik. Die Zehn Orchester. Die Musik der Zwei Abteilungen. Akademien und Konservatorien'. Ibid., cols. 1207–16.

Farmer, H. G.: 'Reciprocal influences in music 'twixt the Far and Middle East'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (London, 1934), pp. 327–42.

Fernald, H. E.: 'Ancient Chinese Musical Instruments'. Museum Journal (Philadelphia, 1936); reprinted in Hsiao Ch'ien, A Harp with a Thousand Strings (London, 1944), pp. 395–440.

*Fischer, E.: Beiträge zur Erforschung der chinesischen Musik (Leipzig, 1911); reprinted in Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, xii (1911), pp. 153–206.

Gibson, E. H.: 'Music and Musical Instruments of Shang'. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, lxviii (Shanghai, 1937), pp. 8–18.

Goodrich, L. C.: 'The Chinese Shêng and Western Musical Instruments'. China Magazine, xvii (New York, 1941), pp. 10, 11, 14.

Granet, M.: Fêtes et chansons anciennes de la Chine (Paris, 1919).

Grousset, R.: L'Asie orientale des origines au XVe siècle (Paris, 1946).

Gulik, R. H. van: The Lore of the Chinese Lute (Tokyo, 1940).

— 'Brief Note on the Cheng, the Chinese Small Cither'. Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 10–25.

†— 'The Lore of the Chinese Lute'. Monumenta Nipponica, vii, 1/2 (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 300–10.

Hoffmann, A.: Die Lieder des Li Yü (Cologne, 1950).

*Hornbostel, E. M. von: 'Ch'ao-t'ien-tze (Eine chinesische Notation und ihre Ausführungen)'. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, i (1919), pp. 477–98.

*Hsiao Shusien: 'La Chanson populaire chinoise'. Sinologica, i (Basel, 1947), pp. 65–86.

In Faaluu: 'Tarng-Song Dahcheu jy Laiyuan jyi chyi Tzuujiy'. Wuuchang Hwajong Dahshyue Gwoshyue Yanjiou Luennwen Juankan, i. 4 (Tali, 1945) (104).

Karlgren, B.: 'The Date of the Early Dong-so'n Culture'. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Archaeology, xiv (Stockholm, 1942), pp. 1–28.

Kuttner, F. A.: 'The Musical Significance of Archaic Chinese Jades of the Pi-Disk Type'. Artibus Asiae, xvi. 1/2 (Ascona, 1953), pp. 25–50.

Leu Buhwei (15): Leu-Shy Chuenchiou (14), v Guuyueh (61); vi Inliuh (63).

*Levis, J. H.: The Foundations of Chinese Musical Art (Peiping, 1936).

†Liou Cherngfuu: Dictionary of Music (in Chinese) Inyueh Tsyrdean (Shanghai, 1936).

Liou Shi: Shyming (46).

†*Ma Hiao-ts'iun: 'La Musique chinoise'. La Musique des origines à nos jours (Norbert Dufourcq) (Paris, 1946), pp. 438–46.

Mahillon, V. Ch.: Catalogue descriptif et analytique du musée instrumental du Conservatoire Royal de Bruxelles (Ghent, 1880 and 1893).

— Annuaire du Conservatoire Royal de Bruxelles (Ghent, 1886 and 1890). (Contains the conclusion of the catalogue and an account of experiments on the liuhleu.)

Page 541

484

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Moule, A. C.: ‘A list of the Musical and other Sound-Producing Instruments of the Chinese’. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xxxix (Shanghai, 1908), pp. 1–160.

*Moule, G. E.: ‘Notes on the Ting-chi, or half-yearly sacrifice to Confucius (with an appendix on the music by A. C. Moule)’. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xxxiii (Shanghai, 1901), pp. 37–73.

Norlind, T.: ‘Beiträge zur chinesichen Instrumentengeschichte’. Svensk Tidskrift för Musikforskning, xv (1933), pp. 48–83.

Picken, L.: ‘The Origin of the Short Lute’. Galpin Society Journal, viii (London, 1955), pp. 32–42.

Reinhard, K.: Chinesische Musik (Eisenach and Kassel, 1956).

Robinson, K.: ‘Chinesische Musik, I. Geschichtliche Entwicklung von der Frühzeit (Shang-Dynastie) bis zum Ende der Han-Zeit (1523 a. Chr. bis 206 p. Chr.) (Deutsche Übers. und Bearb.: Hans Eckardt)’. Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ii (ed. F. Blume) (Kassel and Basel, 1953), cols. 1195–1205.

Shiah Cherngdao: ‘Bairshyr Gechue Parngpuu Biann’. Yannjing Shyuebaw (113) (Peiping, 1932).

Shujing (91): Shuenn Dean (92); Yushu Yihjyi (93).

Souen K’ai-ti: ‘L’origine et le dévéloppement du théâtre des marionnettes chinoises’. Bulletin du centre franco-chinois d’études sinologiques (194), i (Pekin, 1944), pp. 81–105 (in Chinese with summary in French).

*Soulié de Morant, G., and Gailhard, A.: Théâtre et musique modernes en Chine (Paris, 1926).

Stanley, A.: ‘Putoshan’. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, xlvi (Shanghai, 1915), pp. 1–18.

Symaa Chian (16): Shyyjih (17), xxiv, f. 37 v°. Translated in R. H. van Gulik: The Lore of the Chinese Lute (Tokyo, 1940).

*Tanabe, H.: Nihon Ongaku Kôwa (Tokyo, 1926).

Trefzger, H.: ‘Das Musikleben der Tang-Zeit’. Sinica, xiii (Stuttgart, 1938).

*T’ung Fei: Fundamentals of Chinese Music (195) (Shanghai, 1927) (in Chinese).

Waley, A.: The Book of Songs (London, 1937).

— The Life and Times of Po-Chü-I (London, 1949), pp. 150–5.

*Wang Kwang-ch’i: ‘Über die chinesische klassische Oper 1530–1860’. Orient et Occident, Bibliothèque Sino-Internationale (Geneva, 1934).

Waterman, R. A., Lichtenwanger, W., Herrmann, V. H., Poleman, H. I., and Hobbs, C.; ‘Bibliography of Asiatic Musics, Eleventh and Twelfth Instalments, D. China’. Notes, vii, 3 and 4 (New York, 1950), pp. 415–23, 613–21.

*Yang Inliou: Jonggwo Inyueh Shyygang (Shanghai, 1953).

Yihlii (37), vii.

CHAPTER III

(Numbers in brackets, other than dates, refer to serial entries in the Glossary of Characters, p. 190. Entries not mentioned in the text are marked †.)

(a) TRANSCRIPTIONS

Davison, A. T., and Apel, W.: Historical Anthology of Music, i (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1947).

Gironcourt, G. de: ‘Motifs de chants cambodgiens’. Bulletin de la Société des Études indochinoises, Nouvelle Série, xvi, No. 1 (Saigon, 1941), pp. 51–105.

Page 542

Groneman, J., and Land, J. P. N.: De Gamĕlan te Jogjakarta (Amsterdam, 1890).

Haslund-Christensen, H., and Emsheimer, E.: The Music of the Mongols (Stockholm, 1943).

Keh, C. S.: 'Die koreanische Musik'. Sammlung musikwissenschaftlicher Abhandlungen, xvii (Strasbourg, 1935).

Kiyose, Y.: Six Japanese Folk Songs from Shinano District (Tokyo, 1937).

Konoye, H. and N.: Etenraku (180) (Tokyo, 1935).

McPhee, C.: Balinese Ceremonial Music Transcribed for Two Pianos, Four Hands: Pemoehgkah; Gambangan; Taboe Teloe (New York, 1940).

Matsudaira, Y.: Seven Japanese Songs from Nambu District (Tokyo, 1937).

Saionji, Y.: Nihon Minyō Taikan, Kantō-hen (Tokyo, 1953).

Seelig, P. J.: Siamesische Musik (Bandoeng, 1932).

Stumpf, C.: 'Mongolische Gesänge'. Sammelbände für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (1922), pp. 107–12.

Takeda, C.: 'The Songs of the Mongols, Notations and Explanations'. Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 147–54; and x-xi (Tokyo, 1952), pp. 67–73 (in Japanese).

Teachers' Training College: Kashmīrī Mūsiqī, i (Srinagar, n.d.) (in Urdū).

Tokyo Academy of Music: Collection of Japanese Koto Music (Tokyo, 1888).

Torhout, N. de, and Humbert-Sauvageot: 'Dix-huits chants et poèmes mongols'. Bibliothèque musicale du musée Guimet, 1re série, iv (Paris, 1937).

Tricon, A., and Bellan, Ch.: Chansons cambodgiennes (Saïgon, 1921).

(b) BOOKS AND ARTICLES

(* indicates presence of musical examples.)

Auboyer, J.: 'L'Indochine'. L'Asie orientale des origines au XVe siècle (R. Grousset) (Paris, 1941).

*Bose, F.: Musikalische Völkerkunde (Freiburg i. Br., 1953).

Chardin, P. T., de, and Pei Wen-chung: Le Néolithique de la Chine (Pekin, 1944).

Condominas, G.: 'Le Lithophone préhistorique de Ndut Lieng Krak'. Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, xlv (Paris, 1951), pp. 359–92.

*Courant, M.: 'Essai historique sur la musique classique des Chinois avec un appendice relatif à la musique coréenne'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie) 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 211–20.

— 'Japon, Notice historique'. Ibid., pp. 242–56.

Covarrubias, M.: Island of Bali (London, 1937).

*Crossley-Holland, P. C.: 'Tibetan Music'. Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians, viii (London, 1954), pp. 456–64.

*Demiéville, P.: Hōbōgirin (Tokyo, 1930); see article 'Bombai'.

*Eckardt, A.: 'Koreanische Musik'. Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens, xxiv B (Tokyo, 1930).

Ellis, A. J.: 'Musical Scales of Various Nations'. Journal of the Society of Arts, 27 March (London, 1885).

*Emsheimer, E.: 'Über das Vorkommen und die Anwendungsart der Maulltrommel in Sibirien und Zentral-Asien'. Ethnos, vi (Stockholm, 1941), pp. 109–27.

Fitzgerald, C. P.: The Tower of Five Glories (London, 1941).

*Francke, A. H.: 'La musique au Thibet'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3084–93.

Fürer Haimendorf, C. von: The Naked Nagas (Calcutta, 1946).

Page 543

486

BIBLIOGRAPHY

*Gironcourt, G. de: 'Recherches de géographie musicale en Indochine'. Bulletin de la Société des Études indochinoises, Nouvelle Série, xvii, No. 4 (Saïgon, 1942), pp. 7-174.

Goloubew, V.: 'L'Âge du bronze au Tonkin et dans le Nord-Annam'. Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, xxix (Hanoy, 1929), pp. 1-46.

*Harich-Schneider, E.: 'Japanische Impressionen, I'. Musica (Kassel, 1949), No. 3, pp. 85-90.

*—— 'Japanische Impressionen, II'. Ibid., No. 4, pp. 129-36.

*—— 'Japanische Impressionen, III'. Ibid., No. 6, pp. 205-9.

*—— 'A Survey of the Remains of Japanese Court Music'. Ethnos, xvi (Stockholm, 1951), pp. 105-24.

*—— 'Koromogae, one of the Saibara of Japanese Court Music'. Monumenta Nipponica, viii, 1/2 (Tokyo, 1952), pp. 398-406.

*—— 'The Present Condition of Japanese Court Music'. The Musical Quarterly, xxxix (1953), pp. 49-74.

*—— The Rhythmical Patterns in Gagaku and Bugaku (Leiden, 1954).

*Hayashi, K.: Swei-Tarng Yannyuehdiayw Yanjiou (181) (Shanghai, 1936) (Chinese translation from the Japanese).

*Hood, M.: The Nuclear Theme as a Determinant of Patet in Javanese Music (Groningen and Djakarta, 1954).

*Humbert-Lavergne, M.: 'La musique à travers la vie laotienne'. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, ii (1934), pp. 14-19.

*Hutton, J. H.: The Sema Nagas (London, 1921).

*Hwang Yeoudih: 'Lienyang Yauren-di Inyueh'. Minswu, i (4) (Canton, 1942), pp. 28-35.

In Faaluu: 'Tsorng Lihshyy-shanq Luenn Shinjiang Gewuu'. Shanghae Jong- iang Ryhbaw (172) (Shanghai, 12 December 1947).

*Japanese Buddhist Music: See Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, xii-xiii (Tokyo, 1954).

*Knosp, G.: 'Histoire de la musique dans l'Indo-Chine'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3100-46.

—— 'La Birmanie'. Ibid., pp. 3094-99.

*Kolinski, F. M.: 'Die Musik der Primitivstämme auf Malaka usw.'. Anthropos, xxv (Vienna, 1930), pp. 585-648.

*Kunst, J.: A Study on Papuan Music (Weltevreden, 1931).

—— Over zeldsame Fluiten en veelstemmige Muziek in het Ngadjen-Gebied (West-Flores) (Batavia, 1931).

—— De Toonkunst van Java (The Hague, 1934).

—— 'A Musicological Argument for Cultural Relationship between Indonesia—Probably the Isle of Java—and Central Africa'. Proceedings of the Musical Association, lxii (London, 1936), pp. 57-76.

—— 'Music in Nias'. Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie, xxxviii (Leiden, 1940), pp. 1-89.

—— 'Music in Flores'. Ibid., supplement to vol. xlii (Leiden, 1942).

—— Music in Java (2 vols.) (The Hague, 1949).

—— 'Kulturhistorische Beziehungen zwischen dem Balkan und Indonesien'. Mededeeling No. CIII, Afdeling Culturele en Physische Anthropologie No. 46 Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen (Amsterdam, 1953).

*Kunst, J. and Kunst-Wely, C. J. A.: De Toonkunst van Bali (Weltevreden, 1925).

*Kurosawa, T.: 'The Musical Bow of the Bununs [sic] Tribe in Formosa and Suggestion as to the Origin of the Pentatonic Scale'. Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, x-xi (Tokyo, 1952), pp. 18-32.

Page 544

BIBLIOGRAPHY

487

Kuttner, F. A.: ' Nochmals die Steinzeit-Lithophone von Annam'. Die Musikforschung, vi (1953), pp. 1-8.

*Lange, D. de, and SnelleMAN, J. F.: 'La Musique et les instruments de musique dans les Indes orientales néerlandaises'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3147-78.

*McPhee, C.: 'The Balinese wajang koelit and its music'. Djawa, xvi (Jogjàkartà, 1936).

— 'Angkloeng gamelans in Bali'. Ibid. xvii (Jogjàkartà, 1937).

— A House in Bali (New York, 1944).

— 'The Five-Tone Gamelan Music of Bali'. The Musical Quarterly, xxxv (1949), pp. 250-81.

*Moreux, S.: 'La Musique japonaise'. La Musique des origines à nos jours (Norbert Dufourcq) (Paris, 1946), pp. 446-54.

*Mueller, L.: 'Einige Notizen über die japanische Musik'. Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens in Tokio, i. 6 (Tokyo, 1874), pp. 13-20; i. 8 (Tokyo, 1875), pp. 41-48; i. 9 (Tokyo, 1876), pp. 19-35.

*Myers, C. S.: 'A Study of Sarawak Music'. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, xv (1914), pp. 296-308.

Nippold, W.: Rassen- und Kulturgeschichte der Negrito-Völker Südost-Asiens (Göttingen, 1936).

Peri, N.: 'Études sur le drame lyrique japonais'. Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, ix (Hanoi, 1909), pp. 251, 707, and succeeding volumes.

*— 'Essai sur les gammes japonaises'. Bibliothèque musicale du musée Guimet, 2e série, i (Paris, 1934).

*Phra Chen DuriyangA: Siamese Music (Bangkok, n.d.).

*Piggott, F. T.: The Music and Musical Instruments of Japan (Yokohama and London, 1893 and 1909).

Playfair, A.: The Garos (London, 1909).

Raffles, T. S.: The History of Java, i (London, 1817), p. 472.

*Rock, J. F.: 'The Romance of 2K'A-3MĀ-1GYU-3MI-2GKYI'. Bulletin de l'école française de l'extrême orient, xxxix (Hanoi, 1939), pp. 1-152.

*Sachs, C.: 'Les Instruments de musique de Madagascar'. Travaux et mémoires de l'institut d'ethnologie, xxviii (Paris, 1938).

Savina, F.: Histoire des Miao (Hong Kong, 1924).

Schaeffner, A.: 'Une importante découverte archéologique: Le Lithophone de Ndut Leng Krak (Vietnam)'. La Revue de musicologie, xxxiiie année, N.S.: Nos. 97-98 (1951), pp. 1-19.

Schlesinger, K.: The Greek Aulos (London, 1939).

*Sichel, A.: 'Histoire de la musique des Malgaches'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 3226-33.

*Somervell, T. H.: 'The Music of Tibet'. Musical Times, lxiv (1923), p. 108.

Souen K'ai-ti: 'L'origine et le développement du théâtre des marionnettes chinoises'. Bulletin du centre franco-chinois d'études sinologiques, i (Pekin, 1944), pp. 81-105 (1944).

*Stumpf, C.: 'Tonsystem und Musik der Siamesen'. Sammelbände für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (1922), pp. 129-77.

*Tanabe, H.: Nihon Ongaku Kōwa (Tokyo, 1926) (in Japanese).

— Japanese Music (Tokyo, 1936).

Traynor, L. M., and Kishibe, S.: 'On the Four Unknown Pipes of the Shō (Mouth Organ) used in Ancient Japanese Court Music'. Tōyō Ongaku Kenkyū, ix (Tokyo, 1951), pp. 22-53.

Page 545

488

BIBLIOGRAPHY

*TUCKER, A. N.: Tribal Music and Dancing in the Southern Sudan (Africa) (London, n.d.).

WADDELL, L. A.: The Buddhism of Tibet or Lamaism (Cambridge, 1934).

WALEY, A.: The Nō Plays of Japan (London, 1921).

— The Book of Songs (London, 1937).

WATERMAN, R. A., LICHTENWANGER, W., HERRMANN, V. H., POLEMAN, H. I., and HOBBS, C.: 'Bibliography of Asiatic Musics, Ninth Installment, iv. South-east Asia, A. General, B. Burma, C. Siam, D. Indo-China, E. Malay and Malay Archipelago (East Indies), F. Phillipine Islands'. Notes, vii. 1 (New York, 1949), pp. 84–98.

— 'Ibid., Tenth Installment, v. Central East Asia, A. General, B. Japan, C. Korea'. Notes, vii. 2 (New York, 1950), pp. 265–79.

— 'Ibid., Thirteenth Installment, vi. Central Asia and Siberia, A. General, B. Tibetans, C. Mongols, D. Turkic Peoples, E. Palaeo-Siberian, Samoyeds, Tungus, and Manchus'. Notes, viii. 1 (New York, 1950), pp. 100–18.

— 'Ibid., Fourteenth Installment, Addenda, I. General, II. Southwest Asia, III. India, IV. Southeast Asia, V. Central East Asia, VI. Central Asia and Siberia'. Notes, viii. 2 (New York, 1950), 99. 322–9.

ZOETE, B. DE, and SPIES, W.: Dance and Drama in Bali (London, 1938).

CHAPTER IV

THE MUSIC OF INDIA

(i) Texts

DÂMODARA: Sangītadarpana. First two chapters, introduction, text and English translation by Arnold A. Bake. Bibliothèque musicale du Musée Guimet (Paris, 1930).

NANDIKEŚVARA: Abhinayadarpana. Text and translation edited by Manmohan Ghosh, Calcutta Sanskrit Series, v (Calcutta, 1934).

RÂMÂMÂTYA: Svaramelakalānidhi. Edited with introduction and translation by M. S. Ramaswami Aiyar (Annamalai University, 1932).

ŚÂRNGADEVA: Sangītaratnākara. Sanskrit text with two commentaries and translation of the beginning of the first book by C. Kunhan Raja (Adyar Library, Madras, 1945).

SOMANÂTHA: Rāgavibodha. Edited with introduction and translation by M. S. Ramaswami Aiyar (Madras, 1923).

SIMON, A.: 'Das Puṣpasūtra. Mit Einleitung und Übersetzung'. Abhandlungen der Kgl. Bayrischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, i. Kl., xxiii (1909).

(ii) Notations

RABINDRANATH TAGORE: Twenty-six Songs. With introduction by Arnold A. Bake and Philippe Stern. Bibliothèque musicale du Musée Guimet (Paris, 1935).

RATAN DEVI: Thirty Indian Songs from the Panjab and Kashmir. With an introduction and translations by Ananda K. Coomaraswamy and a foreword by R. Tagore (London, 1913).

SIMON, R.: 'Die Notationen des Somanatha'. Sitzungsberichte d. philos.-philol. u. d. histor. Klasse d. Kgl. Bayerischen Akademie d. Wissenschaften (Munich, 1903).

SOURENDRO MOHUN TAGORE: Six Principal Ragas. With a brief view of Hindu Music (Calcutta, 1877).

Page 546

(iii) General

Abraham, O., and v. Hornbostel, E. M.: 'Phonographierte indische Melo-dien'. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, v (1903-4).

Clements, E.: Introduction to the Study of Indian Music (London, 1913).

Danielou, A.: Northern Indian Music. 2 vols. (London, 1949).

Fox Strangways, A. H.: The Music of Hindostan (Oxford, 1914).

— 'Indian Music'. Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 5th edition, iv (London, 1954), pp. 456-60 (revised by A. A. Bake).

— 'Music'. The Legacy of India, ed. by G. T. Garratt (Oxford, 1937).

Fyzee-Rahamin, A. B.: The Music of India (London, 1926).

Grosset, J.: 'Inde, histoire de la musique depuis l'origine jusqu'à nos jours'. Encyclopédie de la Musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 257-376.

Mukerji, D. P.: Indian Music: An Introduction (Bombay, 1945).

Pingle, B. A.: Indian Music (Bombay, 1898).

Popley, A. H.: The Music of India (London, 1921).

Ranade, G. H. Hindustani Music (Poona, 1939).

Shripada Bandopadhyaya: The Music of India (Bombay, 1945).

(iv) Special Subjects

(a) Vedic

Faddegon, B.: 'Studies on the Sāmaveda'. Part I. Verhandelingen der Kon. Ned. Akad. v. Wetensch. Nieuwe Reeks, lvii, No. 1 (Amsterdam, 1951).

Felber, E., and Geiger, B.: 'Die indische Musik der vedischen und klassischen Zeit'. Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Akademie d. Wissenschaften in Wien. Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 170. Bd., 7. Abhandlung (Vienna, 1912).

Haug, M.: 'Über das Wesen und den Wert des vedischen Akzentes'. Abhandlungen d. Bayer. Akademie d. Wissenschaften, xiii. 2. (1874).

Hoogt, J. M. van der: The Vedic Chant studied in its textual and melodic forms (Wageningen, 1929).

(b) Scales

Danielou, A.: Introduction to the Study of Musical Scales (London, 1943).

Fox Strangways, A. H.: 'The Gāndhāra Grāma'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1935), pp. 689-96.

Mehta, Manharram: Twenty-two Shrutis and two Gramas of Indian Music (Bombay, 1938).

Ramaswami Aiyar, M. S.: 'The Question of Grāmas'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1936), pp. 629-39.

Shripada Bandopadhyay: The Origin of Raga (Delhi, 1946).

Stern, P.: 'La musique indouè. Les Ragas'. Revue Musicale, iii (1923).

(c) Instruments

Marcel-Dubois, C.: Les instruments de musique de l'Inde ancienne (Paris, 1941).

Sachs, C.: 'Die Musikinstrumente Indiens und Indonesiens'. Handbücher der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin. (Berlin, 2nd ed., 1923).

Page 547

490

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER V

ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA1

(i) Sources (Iconography)

BANKS, E. J.: Bismaya (New York, 1912).

BUDGE, E. A. WALLIS: Assyrian Sculptures in the British Museum . . . Reign of Ashur-Nasir-Pal, 885–860 B.C. . . . (London, 1914).

GALPIN, F. W., The Music of the Sumerians and their Immediate Successors, the Babylonians and Assyrians (Cambridge, 1937).

KINSKY, GEORG: Geschichte der Musik in Bildern (Leipzig, 1929).

LANGDON, STEPHEN: Excavations at Kish (London, 1925).

MORGAN, J. DE: Délégation en Perse (Paris, 1901).

OPPENHEIM, M. F. VON: Tell Halaf (London, 1933).

WOOLLEY, LEONARD: Ur Excavations (London, 1934).

(ii) Books and Articles

DUCHESNE, J., and GUILLEMIN, M.: ‘La Harpe en Asie occidentale ancienne’. Revue d’Assyriologie, xxxiv (1937).

—— : ‘Sur l’origine asiatique de la cithare grecque’, L’Antiquité Classique, iv (1935).

FARMER, HENRY GEORGE: ‘The Music of the Sumerians’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1933).

—— ‘Persian Music’. Grove’s Dictionary of Music, 5th edition, vi (London, 1954), pp. 676–82.

—— ‘Pandur or Pantur’. Grove’s Dictionary of Music, vi, p. 535.

—— ‘Pandoura’. Grove’s Dictionary of Music, vi, p. 534.

GALPIN, F. W.: The Music of the Sumerians . . . (Cambridge, 1937).

—— ‘The Sumerian Harp of Ur’. Music and Letters, x (1929).

—— ‘Babylonian Music’. Grove’s Dictionary of Music i, pp. 282–3.

GENOUILLAC, H. DE: ‘Hymnes Sumériens . . .’. Revue d’Assyriologie (1929).

LANGDON, STEPHEN: Babylonian Liturgies (Paris, 1913).

—— Sumerian and Babylonian Psalms (Paris, 1909).

—— Tammuz and Ishtar (Oxford, 1914).

—— Sumerian Liturgies and Psalms (Philadelphia, 1919).

—— ‘Babylonian and Hebrew Musical Terms’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1921.

—— Babylonian Penitential Psalms (Paris, 1927).

PÉLAGAUD, FERNAND: ‘Syriens et Phrygiens’. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de la Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 49–66.

PINCHES, T. G.: ‘Babylonian and Assyrian Music’. Hastings’ Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (Edinburgh, 1917).

SACHS, CURT: ‘Die Entzifferung einer babylonischen Notenschrift’. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse, xviii (1924).

—— ‘Ein babylonischer Hymnus’. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, vi (1925).

—— Geist und Werden der Musikinstrumente (Berlin, 1929).

—— ‘The Mystery of the Babylonian Notation’. Musical Quarterly, xxvii (1941).

1 A very complete bibliography is to be found in the Music Library Association Notes, v (Washington, 1948), pp. 178–86.

Page 548

Stainer, John: The Music of the Bible . . . with Additional Illustrations and Supplementary Notes by F. W. Galpin (London, 1914).

Thureau-Dangin, F.: 'Le Rituel du Kalu'. Revue d'Assyriologie (1920).

Virolleaud, C., and Pélagaud, F.: 'Assyrie-Chaldée. La Musique Assyro-Babylonienne'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 35-48.

Wegner, Max: Die Musikinstrumente des alten Orients (Münster, 1950).

Woolley, Leonard: Ur Excavations (London, 1934).

CHAPTER VI

ANCIENT EGYPT

(i) Sources (Iconography)

Borchardt, L.: Denkmäler des alten Reiches (Berlin, 1927).

Capart, Jean: Documents pour servir à l'étude de l'art égyptien (Paris, 1927 et seq.).

Champollion, J. F.: Monuments de l'Égypte et de la Nubie (Paris, 1835-45).

Kinsky, Georg: Geschichte der Musik in Bildern (Leipzig, 1929).

Klebs, Luise: (i) 'Die Reliefs des alten Reiches'; (2) 'Die Reliefs und Malereien des mittleren Reiches'; (3) 'Die Reliefs und Malereien des neuen Reiches'. Abhandlungen d. Heidelberger Akademie d. Wissenschaften. Phil.-hist. Klasse, (Heidelberg, 1915 et seq.)

Rosellini, Ippolito: I Monumenti dell' Egitto e della Nubia (Florence, 1832-44).

Sachs, Curt: Die Musikinstrumente des alten Ägyptens (Berlin, 1921).

Steindorff, G.: Die Kunst der Ägypter (Leipzig, 1928).

Weigall, Arthur: Ancient Egyptian Works of Art (London, 1924).

(ii) Books and Articles

Baillet, Auguste and Jules: 'La Chanson chez les Égyptiens'. Mélanges Maspero, i, Orient ancien (Cairo, 1934).

Borchardt, L.: 'Die Rahmentrommel im Museum zu Kairo'. Mélanges Maspero, i, Orient ancien (Cairo, 1934).

Capart, Jean: Les Débuts de l'art en Égypte (Brussels, 1903).

Closson, E.: 'Une Nouvelle Série de hautbois égyptiens antiques'. Festschrift für Guido Adler (Berlin, 1930).

Erman, Adolf: Die Literatur der Ägypter (Leipzig, 1923).

Farmer, Henry George: 'Ancient Egyptian Instruments of Music'. Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, vi (1931).

'The Evolution of the Tunbur or Pandore', Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, v (1925).

'Egyptian Music'. Grove's Dictionary of Music, 5th edition, ii (London, 1954), pp. 891-7.

Faulkner, R. A.: 'The Lamentations of Isis and Nephthys'. Mélanges Maspero, i, Orient ancien (Cairo, 1934).

Heron-Allen, E.: The 'Nefer' Sign. Concerning the hitherto accepted identification of an Egyptian hieroglyph as an instrument of music (Selsey, 1941).

Hickmann, H.: 'La Trompette dans l'Égypte ancienne'. Supplément aux Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte (Cairo, 1946).

Page 549

492

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hickmann, H.: 'Miscellanea Musicologica'. Annales du service des antiquités de l'Égypte, xlviii (1948), 1 (1950).

— 'Ägyptische Musik'. Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, i (Kassel, 1949-51), cols. 92-106.

— 'Les harpes de l'Égypte Pharaonique'. Bulletin de l'Institut d'Égypte, xxxv, (1953).

— 'Quelques considérations sur la danse . . . dans l'Égypte pharaonique'. Cahiers d'histoire égyptienne, v (Cairo, 1953).

— 'Le métier de musicien au temps des Pharaons'. Cahiers d'histoire égyptienne, vi (Cairo, 1954).

— 'Dieux et déesses de la musique'. Cahiers d'histoire égyptienne, vi (Cairo, 1954).

— 'Terminologie musicale de l'Égypte ancienne'. Ibid. xxxvi (1955).

— 'Le Problème de la notation musicale dans l'Égypte ancienne'. Ibid. (1955).

— Musique et vie musicale sous les Pharaons. 3 vols. (Paris, 1956).

Lichtheim, Miriam. 'The Song of the Harper'. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, iv (1945).

Loret, Victor: 'Les Flûtes égyptiennes antiques'. Journal Asiatique (1889).

— 'Les Cymbales égyptiennes'. Sphinx, v (1902).

— 'Note sur les instruments de musique de l'Égypte ancienne'. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 1-30.

Lyle, Robert: 'The Music of the Ancient Egyptians: A Conjectural Sketch.' Musical Monthly Record, lxxviii (1948).

Nash, W. L.: 'A Wooden Handle for Small Cymbals, from Egypt'. Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, xxii (1900).

Pulver, Jeffrey: 'Israel's Music-Lesson in Egypt'. Musical Times, lvi (1915).

— 'The Music of Ancient Egypt'. Proceedings of the Musical Association (1921-2).

Sachs, Curt: 'Die Namen der altägyptischen Musikinstrumente'. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, i (1919).

— 'Die Tonkunst der alten Ägypter'. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, ii (1920).

— 'Altägyptische Musikinstrumente'. Der alte Orient, xxi (Leipzig, 1920).

— Die Musikinstrumente des alten Ägyptens (Berlin, 1921).

— 'Zweiklänge im Altertum'. Festschrift für Johannes Wolf (Berlin, 1929).

— 'Eine ägyptische Winkelharfe'. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache, lxix (1933).

Schäfer, H.: Die Lieder eines ägyptischen Bauern (Leipzig, 1903).

Scott, Nora E.: 'The Lute of the Singer Har-Mosě'. Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art (1944).

Southgate, T. L.: 'On a Pair of Ancient Egyptian Double Flutes'. Proceedings of the Musical Association (1890-1).

— 'Communication on the Ancient Egyptian Scale'. Proceedings of the Musical Association (1890-1).

— 'The Recent Discovery of Egyptian Flutes'. Musical Times, xxxi (1890).

— 'Some Ancient Musical Instruments'. Musical News, xxv (1903).

— 'Ancient Flutes from Egypt'. Journal of Hellenic Studies, xxxv (1915).

Strickland-Anderson, L.: 'A Sketch of the Origin and Development of Egyptian Music'. Calcutta Review, ii (1924).

Whyte, E. T.: 'Egyptian Musical Instruments'. Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, xxi). (1899).

Page 550

BIBLIOGRAPHY

493

CHAPTER VII

MUSIC IN THE BIBLE

(i) Music of the Bible

Oesterley, W. O. E.: 'Music of the Hebrews'. The Oxford History of Music, Introductory Volume (Oxford, 1929), pp. 33–65.

Prince, J. D.: 'Music'. Encyclopaedia Biblica, iii (New York, 1902), cols. 3225–43.

Various authors. 'Musik und Gesang'. Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, iv, 2nd ed. (Tübingen, 1930), cols. 294–306.

(ii) Hebrew and early Jewish Music

Elbogen, I.: Der jüdische Gottesdienst in seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung (Leipzig, 1913).

Finesinger, S. B.: 'Musical Instruments in the Old Testament'. Hebrew Union College Annual, iii (Cincinnati, 1926), pp. 21–76.

Gressmann, H.: 'Musik und Musikinstrumente'. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten (Giessen, 1903).

Idelsohn, A. Z.: Jewish Music in its Historical Development (New York, 1929).

Oesterley, W. O. E.: A Fresh Approach to the Psalms (New York, 1937).

Thackeray, H. St. John: The Septuagint and Jewish Worship (London, 1921).

Werner, E.: 'The Conflict between Hellenism and Judaism in the Music of the Early Christian Church'. Hebrew Union College Annual, xx (1947), pp. 407–70.

(iii) New Testament and early Christian Music

Bousset, W.: Kyrios Christos (Göttingen, 1921).

Dölger, F. J.: Sol Salutis (Münster, 1925).

Duchesne, L.: Christian Worship: its Origin and Evolution. 5th ed. (London, 1927).

Dugmore, C. W.: The Influence of the Synagogue upon the Divine Office (London, 1927).

Kroll, J.: Die christliche Hymnodik bis zu Klemens von Alexandrien, Braunschweiger Vorlesungsverzeichnis (Königsberg, 1921).

Oesterley, W. O. E.: The Jewish Background of the Christian Liturgy (Oxford, 1925).

Quasten, J.: Musik und Gesang in den Kulten der heidnischen Antike und christlichen Frühzeit (Münster, 1930).

Wellesz, E.: Aufgaben und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der byzantinischen und orientalischen Kirchenmusik (Münster, 1923).

Werner, E.: 'The Conflict between Hellenism and Judaism in the Music of the Early Christian Church', Hebrew Union College Annual, xx (1947), pp. 407–70.

(iv) Literary Criticism of the Bible

Bultmann, R. K.: Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition. 2nd ed. (Göttingen, 1931).

Dibelius, M.: A Fresh Approach to the New Testament and Early Christian Literature (London, 1936).

Page 551

494

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Gunkel, H.: Einleitung in die Psalmen, in the Handkommentar zum Alten Testament (Göttingen, 1933).

Pfeiffer, R. H.: Introduction to the Old Testament (New York, 1941).

Staerk, W.: ‘Lyrik’, in Die Schriften des Alten Testaments (Göttingen, 1920).

Welch, A. C.: The Work of the Chronicler (London, 1939).

(v) The Dead Sea Scrolls

Burrows, M. (ed.): The Dead Sea Scrolls of St. Mark’s Monastery, i (New Haven, 1950).

—— The Dead Sea Scrolls (New York, 1955).

CHAPTER VIII

THE MUSIC OF POST-BIBLICAL JUDAISM

(i) Sources

Baer, A.: Baal Tefilla (Der praktische Vorbeter) (Frankfurt a. M., 1877).

Idelsohn, A. Z.: Thesaurus of Hebrew Oriental Melodies (10 vols.) (Leipzig–New York–Jerusalem, 1914–32).

Kahle, P.: Masoreten des Ostens (Leipzig, 1913).

—— Masoreten des Westens (Stuttgart, 1927).

Lachmann, R.: Jewish Cantillation and Song in the Isle of Djerba (Jerusalem, 1941).

Marcello, B.: Èstro armonico-poetico (Venice, 1704).

Naumbourg, S.: Agudath Schirim (Recueil de chants religieux, &c.) (Paris, 1874).

—— Zemiroth Israel (Paris, 1847).

Portaleone, A.: Shilte ha-gibborim (Heb.) with Latin translation in B. Ugolinus, Thesaurus Antiquitatum, xxxii (Venice, 1744–67).

Rebours, J. B.: Traité de Psaltique (Paris, 1906).

Reuchlin, J.: De accentibus linguae Hebraicae libri III (Hagenau, 1518).

Rossi il Ebreo, S. DE’: Shir hashirim asher Lishlomo (with preface by Rabbi Juda Leon da Modena) (Venice, 1623).

—— new edition in score by S. Naumbourg (Paris, 1877).

Werner, E., and Sonne, I.: ‘The Philosophy and Theory of Music in Judaeo-Arabic Literature’. Hebrew Union College Annual, xvi, xvii (Cincinnati, 1941–3).

(ii) General Subjects

Birnbaum, E.: Liturgische Übungen (Berlin, 1906).

Consolo, F.: Libro dei Canti d’Israele (Florence, 1891).

Gastoué, A.: Les Origines du Chant Romain (Paris, 1907).

—— ‘Chant Juif et Chant Grégorien’. Revue du Chant Grégorien (1930–1).

Gradenwitz, P.: The Music of Israel (New York, 1949).

Idelsohn, A. Z.: Jewish Music in its Historical Development, 2nd edition (New York, 1944).

Sachs, C.: Rhythm and Tempo (New York, 1952).

Wachsmann, K.: Untersuchungen zum vorgregorianischen Gesang (Regensburg, 1935).

Page 552

BIBLIOGRAPHY

495

WAGNER, P.: Gregorianische Melodien, 3 vols. (Leipzig, 1911-21).

WELLESZ, E.: Aufgaben und Probleme auf dem Gebiet der byzantinischen und orientalischen Kirchenmusik (Münster, 1923).

—— Eastern Elements in Western Chant (Oxford, 1947).

—— Byzantine Music and Hymnography (Oxford, 1949).

WERNER E.: The Sacred Bridge (Studies on the liturgical and musical interdependence of Synagogue and Church) (London-New York, 1956).

—— 'The Common Ground in the Chant of Synagogue and Church'. Atti del Congresso (Rome, 1951).

—— 'Preliminary Notes on Jewish and Catholic Musical Punctuation'. Hebrew Union College Annual, xv (1940).

—— 'Jewish Music'. Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 5th edition, iv (London, 1954), pp. 615–36.

—— 'Church, Music of the Early'. Ibid. ii, pp. 283–91.

(iii) Special Subjects

BIRNBAUM, E.: Jüdische Musiker am Hof von Mantua (Vienna, 1893).

BURROWS, M.: The Dead Sea Scrolls (New York, 1955).

FARMER, G. H.: Saʿadya Gaon on the Influence of Music (London, 1943).

—— Maimonides on Listening to Music (Bearsden, 1941).

HØEG, C.: La Notation ecphonétique (Paris and Copenhagen, 1935).

IDELSOHN, A. Z.: 'Die Maqāmen der arabischen Musik'. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, xv (1914).

—— 'The Mogen Ovos Mode'. Hebrew Union College Annual, xiv (1939).

KAHLE, P.: The Cairo Geniza (London, 1947).

LOEWENSTEIN, H.: 'Eine pentatonische Bibelweise in der deutschen Synagoge'. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, xii (1930).

NEʾEMAN, J. L.: Tzliley ha-miqra (Hebr.) (Jerusalem, 1955).

NETTL, P.: Alte jüdische Musiker und Spielleute (Prague, 1923).

ROTH, C.: L'Accademia musicale del Ghetto di Venezia (Florence, 1928).

SCHÖNBERG, J.: Die traditionellen Gesänge des israelitischen Gottesdienstes in Deutschland (Nuremberg, 1926).

SINGER, J.: Die Tonarten des traditionellen Synagogengesanges (Vienna, 1886).

SUKENIK, M.: Megillot Genuzot (Hebr.) (Jerusalem, 1950).

WELLESZ, E.: 'Studien zur äthiopischen Kirchenmusik'. Oriens Christianus. N.s., ix, pp. 79–106 (Leipzig).

WERNER, E.: 'The Origin of the Eight Modes of Music'. Hebrew Union College Annual, xxi (1948).

—— 'The Psalmody Formula Neannoe', Musical Quarterly, xxviii (1942).

—— 'Die hebräischen Intonationen des B. Marcello'. Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums (Breslau, 1937).

—— 'The Origin of Psalmody'. Hebrew Union College Annual, xxv (1954).

CHAPTER IX

GREEK MUSIC

I. ANCIENT SOURCES (selected for non-specialists in chronological order).

(i) Art of Music

HOMER. Text: T. W. Allen (Oxford, 1906 and 1931).

PINDAR. Text, English translation and commentary: L. R. Farnell (London, 1932).

Page 553

496

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Euripides. Bacchae. Text and commentary (with metrical analysis): E. R. Dodds (Oxford, 1944).

Aristophanes. Text, English translation and commentary: B. B. Rogers (London, 1902–6).

Plato (especially passages in Republic, Laws, Phaedo, Symposium, Philebus Gorgias, Laches, Protagoras, Timaeus). Text: J. Burnet (Oxford, 1905–10). Translations: B. Jowett, 4th edition (revised) (Oxford, 1953). Commentaries: on Phaedo: J. Burnet (Oxford, 1911), R. S. Bluck (London, 1955); on Timaeus: A. E. Taylor (Oxford, 1928).

Aristoxenus. Text, English translation and commentary: H. Macran (Oxford, 1902).

— Elementa Harmonica. Text, Italian translation and commentary: R. da Rios, 2 vols. (Rome, 1954).

— Further fragments. Text and German commentary: F. Wehrli, Aristoxenos (vol. ii of Die Schule des Aristoteles) (Basle, 1945).

Timotheus. U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Die Perser (Leipzig, 1903). Diehl, E. (ed.): Anthologia Lyrica Graeca. 2nd edition (Leipzig, 1942). Powell, J. U. (ed.): Collectanea Alexandrina. Oxford, 1925.

(ii) History of Music (as reconstructed in and after the fourth century B.C.).

Athenaeus (especially Book XIV). Text and English translation (Loeb edition, revised). C. B. Gulick (Harvard, 1950).

[Pseudo-]Plutarch: De musica. Text, French translation, and commentary: H. Weil and T. Reinach (Paris, 1900).

— Text, Translation and Commentary: F. Lasserre (Lausanne, 1954).

(iii) Harmonic Science (after Aristoxenus)

Ptolemy: Harmonics. Text: I. Düring (Göteborg, 1930), with Porphyry (ibid., 1932), and German translation and commentary (ibid., 1934).

Jan, C. von (ed.): Musici Scriptores Graeci (Euclid, minor theorists, sundry excerpts, some musical fragments). Text and Latin prolegomena, &c., Bibliotheca Teubneriana (Leipzig, 1895). Supplementum of musical fragments, ibid. (Leipzig, 1899).

Aristides Quintilianus. Text: A. Jahn (Berlin, 1882).

Philodemus. Text: J. Kemke, Bibliotheca Teubneriana (Leipzig, 1884).

Theon of Smyrna: Text: E. Hiller, ibid. (Leipzig, 1878).

Anonymi Scriptio de musica. Bacchii senioris introductio artis musicae. Text and commentary: F. Bellermann (Berlin, 1841).

Gevaert, F. A., and Vollgraff, C.: Problèmes musicaux d’Aristote. Text, French translation and commentary (Ghent, 1903).

(iv) Musical Documents (see also pp. 363–76 and notes).

Jan, C. von: op. cit. (§ iii).

Reinach, T.: appendix to La Musique grecque (Paris, 1926).

Mountford, J. F.: ‘Greek Music in the papyri and inscriptions’. Powell and Barber, New Chapters in Greek Literature, 2nd series (Oxford, 1929) and 3rd series (Oxford, 1933).

— ‘A new fragment of Greek music in Cairo’. Journal of Hellenic Studies, li (1936).

Grande, C. del: ‘Nuovo frammento di musica greca in un papiro del museo di Cairo’. Aegyptus, v (1936).

Martin, E.: Trois Documents de musique grecque (Paris, 1953).

Page 554

WinningTon-Ingram, R. P. (with S. Eitrem and L. Amundsen): 'Fragments of Unknown Greek Tragic Texts', Symbolae Osloenses, xxxi (1955).

(v) Notation

Bellermann, F.: Die Tonleitern und Musiknoten der Griechen (Berlin, 1847).

Fortlage, K.: Das musikalische System der Griechen in seiner Urgestalt (Leipzig, 1847).

Sachs, C.: 'Die griechische Instrumentalnotenschrift' and 'Die griechische Gesangsnotenschrift'. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, vi and vii (1924).

Westphal, R.: Griechische Harmonik und Melopöie, chapter VIII (Leipzig, 1886).

(vi) Instruments

Reinach, T.: 'Lyra', 'Tibia', &c. Daremberg-Saglio, Dictionnaire des Antiquités (Paris, 1873-1917).

Schlesinger, K.: The Greek Aulos (London, 1939).

Wegner, M.: Das Musikleben der Griechen (Berlin, 1949).

No full collection of archaeological evidence exists.

II. MODERN WORKS

(i) General

Abert, H.: Die Lehre vom Ethos in der griechischen Musik (Leipzig, 1899).

Bowra, C. M.: Greek Lyric Poetry from Alcman to Simonides (Oxford, 1936).

Emmanuel, M.: 'Grèce'. Encyclopédie de la musique I (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, i (Paris, 1913), pp. 377-540.

— La Danse grecque antique (Paris, 1895).

Galilei, Vincenzo. Dialogo della musica antica e moderna (Florence, 1581).

Gevaert, F. A.: Histoire et théorie de la musique d'antiquité (Ghent 1875-81).

— La Mélopée antique (Ghent, 1885).

Grand, C. Del: Espressione musicale dei poeti greci (Naples, 1932).

Jaeger, W.: Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (Oxford, 1946).

Laloy, L.: Aristoxène de Tarente et la musique d'antiquité (Paris, 1904).

Marrou, H.: Histoire de l'éducation dans l'antiquité (Paris, 2nd ed., 1950).

— St. Augustin et la fin de la culture antique (Paris, 1949).

— Μουσικος Ανηρ (Grenoble, 1937).

Pickard-Cambridge, A. W.: Dithyramb, Tragedy, and Comedy (Oxford, 1927).

— The Dramatic Festivals of Athens (Oxford, 1953).

Reinach, T.: La Musique grecque (Paris, 1926).

— 'Musica'. Daremberg-Saglio, Dictionnaire des antiquités (Paris, 1873-1917).

Riemann, H.: Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, i (Leipzig, 2nd ed., 1919).

Séchan, L.: La Danse grecque antique (Paris, 1930).

Vetter, W.: 'Musik'. Pauly and Wissowa, Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (1894—still in progress).

Westphal, R.: Aristoxenos. I. Commentary (Leipzig, 1883), II. Text (Leipzig, 1893).

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von: Griechische Verskunst (Leipzig, 1921).

(ii) Special points of History or Theory

Bapp, C. A.: De fontibus quibus Athenaeus in rebus musicis enarrandis usus sit (Leipzig, 1885).

B 3608

K k

Page 555

498

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dale, A. M.: The Lyric Metres of Greek Drama (Cambridge, 1948).

Denniston, J. D.: 'Metre, Greek'. Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford, 1949).

— 'Some Recent Theories of the Greek Modes'. Classical Quarterly, vii (1913).

Düring, I.: 'Studies in Musical Terminology in Fifth-Century Literature'. Eranos, xliii (1945).

Garrod, H. W.: 'The Hyporcheme of Pratinas', Classical Review, xxxiv (1920).

Gombosi, O.: Tonarten und Stimmungen der antiken Musik. (Copenhagen, 1939).

Marrou, H.: 'Μελωγραφία', L'antiquité classique, xv (1946).

Martellotti, G.: Mesomede (Rome, 1929).

Monro, D. B.: Modes of Ancient Greek Music (Oxford, 1894).

Mountford, J. F.: 'Greek Music and its Relation to Modern Times'. Journal of Hellenic Studies, xl (1920).

— 'The Musical Scales of Plato's Republic'. Classical Quarterly, xvii (1923).

— 'The Harmonics of Ptolemy and the Lacuna in ii, 14'. Transactions of the American Philological Association, lvii (1926).

Page, D. L.: Alcman: The Partheneion (Oxford, 1951).

Reinach, T.: 'La Musique des sphères'. Revue des études grecques, xiii (1900).

Ruelle, C. E.: 'Le musicographe Aristide Quintilien'. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, ix (1907).

Stiles, F. H. E.: 'An Explanation of the Modes or Tones in the Ancient Greek Music'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, li (1760).

Vetter, W.: 'Musikalische Sinndeutung des antiken Nomos'. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, xvii (1935).

Winningington-Ingram, R. P.: Mode in Ancient Greek Music (Cambridge, 1936).

— 'The Spondeion Scale'. Classical Quarterly, xxii (1928).

— 'Aristoxenus and the Intervals of Greek Music'. Classical Quarterly, xx (1926).

— 'The Pentatonic Tuning of the Greek Lyre: a theory examined'. Classical Quarterly, new series, vi (1956).

CHAPTER X

ROMAN MUSIC

(i) General Histories and Encyclopedias

(A) Most of the older histories of music include something about Roman music in their sections on Greece. Burney devotes a chapter to the subject and there are valuable remarks in Gevaert, Histoire et théorie de la musique d'antiquité (Ghent, 1875-81).

Bartholinus: De tibiis veterum et earum antiquo usu libri tres (Rome, 1677).

Chappell, W.: History of Music. I. From the earliest records to the fall of the Roman Empire (London 1874).

Degani: La Musica nella preistoria e nelle antiche civiltà (Reggio Emilia, 1939).

(B) Useful works of reference include the catalogue of the German Archaeological Institute of Rome, Nairn's Classical Hand-list, and l'Année philologique.

Abert, A. in Friedländer: Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms. 9th edition (Leipzig, 1921-3).

Behn, F. 'Die Musik im römischen Heere'. Mainzer Zeitschrift, vii (1912), p. 36.

Page 556

Daremberg-Saglio: Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines d'après les textes et les monuments (1877-1919).

Pauly and Wissowa: Real-Encyclopädie d. klassischen Altertumswissenschaft (1894—still in progress).

(ii) For the Etruscans and their connexions with Rome

Fell, R. A. L.: Etruria and Rome (Cambridge, 1924).

Giglioli, G. Q.: L'Arte etrusca (Milan, 1935).

McCartney, E. S.: 'Military indebtedness of Early Rome to Etruria'. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, i, p. 121.

Solari, A.: Vita publica e privata degli Etruschi (Florence, 1931).

(iii) For the Theatre

Bieber, M.: The History of the Greek and Roman Theater (Princeton, 1939).

(iv) For Roman art and Hellenistic painting

Herrmann, P. (ed.): Denkmäler d. Malerei d. Altertums (in progress from 1906).

Reinach, S.: Répertoire des reliefs grecs et romains, i-iii (Paris, 1909-12).

— Répertoire des peintures grecques et romains (Paris, 1922).

Rizzo, G. E.: La Pittura ellenistico-romana (Milan, 1929).

Strong, E.: La scultura romana da Augusto a Costantino. 2 vols. (Florence, 1923-6).

— Art in Ancient Rome (Ars Una) (London, 1929).

Mostra Augustea della Romanità. Catalogue and separate bibliographies and index (Rome, 4th ed., 1939). Section lxx is devoted to music.

(v) The Aquincum organ

Hyde, W. W.: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, lxix (1938), p. 392.

Kuzsinsky, V.: Aquincum (Budapest, 1934). The site of the schola centonariorum where the organ stood is site 30 of plan I.

Mercurelli, C.: Rivista di Archeologia cristiana, xv (1938), p. 73.

Nagy, L.: Die Orgel von Aquincum (Budapest, 1934).

— Laurea Aquincenses, ii (1941), p. 182 for the building, pl. xli shows the museum case with the remains on show.

(vi) Papyri

It is not easy to find one's way about the specialized literature. A number of musicians' contracts are collected in Tenney Frank's Economic Survey of Rome, volume devoted to Egypt, p. 299 (cf. p. 694 for musicians in public games). The latest list of teaching contracts is in Taubenschlag, Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the light of the papyri (New York, 1944), p. 284. For the tax on trades see the appropriate sections of Wallace, Taxation in Egypt (Princeton, 1938) and Michigan papyri, v, Tebtunis II, p. 321 for a tax on piper and musician. There is an important article by Westermann in the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology (1932), p. 16, on entertainments in villages. Two new papyri throw light on the variety of musical instruments: Knudtzor, Bakchiastixte (1946), no. 2 for a list of temple musical instruments in A.D. 188, including a monochord; Petropoulos, Papyri Societatis Archaeologicae Atheniensis (1939), 43v, second century A.D., includes references to the bagpipes and the funeral pipes.

Page 557

500

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER XI

THE MUSIC OF ISLAM

(i) Sources

Al-Hefni, M.: Ibn Sina's Musiklehre, hauptsächlich an seinem 'Nağāt' erläutert, nebst Übersetzung u. Herausgade des Musikabschnittes des 'Naġāt' (Berlin, 1931).

Al-Hujwīrī: The Kashf al mahjūb, the oldest Persian treatise on Ṣūfism. Translated by R. A. Nicholson (London, 1911).

Al-Maqqarī: The History of the Mohammedan Dynasties in Spain . . . Translated by Pascual de Gayangos (London, 1840-3).

Al-Mas‘ūdī: Maçoudi: Les Prairies d'or. Texte et traduction par Barbier de Meynard et Pavet de Courteuil (Paris, 1861-77).

Carra de Vaux, B.: Le Traité des rapports musicaux ou l'épître à Scharaf ed-Dīn, par Ṣafī ed-Dīn 'Abd el-Mumin Albaghādī (Paris, 1891).

D'Erlanger, R.: La Musique arabe, Tome I, Al-Fārābī . . . Grand traité de musique . . . Livres i et ii (Paris, 1930).

— La Musique arabe, Tome II, Al-Fārābī . . . Livre III, et Avicenne . . . Kitābu'š-Šifā' . . . (Paris, 1935).

— La Musique arabe. Tome III, Safiyu-d-Dīn al-Urmawī: I, Aš-Šarafiyah . . . : II, Kitāb al-adwār (Paris, 1938).

— La Musique arabe, Tome IV, I, Traité anonyme . . . II, Al-Lādhiqī, Traité al-Fathiyah (Paris, 1939).

Farmer, H. G.: An Old Moorish Lute Tutor: Being Four Arabic Texts from Unique Manuscripts . . . (Glasgow, 1933).

— Al-Fārābī's Arabic Latin Writings on Music: In the 'Iḥṣā' al-‘ulūm' . . ., 'De scientiis' . . ., and 'De ortu scientiarum' (Glasgow, 1934).

— Turkish Instruments of Music in the Seventeenth Century, as described in the 'Siyāhat nāma of Ewliyā Chelebī' (Glasgow, 1937).

— The Organ of the Ancients: From Eastern Sources (Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic) (London, 1939).

— 'The Sources of Arabian Music. An Annotated Bibliography of Arabic Manuscripts which deal with the Theory, Practice, and History of Arabian Music'. Records of the Glasgow Bibliographical Society, xiii (1939). Issued separately in 1940.

— Music: The Priceless Jewel. From the 'Kitāb al-'iqd al-farīd' of Ibn 'Abd Rabbihi (d. 940) (Bearsdon, 1942).

— Sa'adyah Gaon on the Influence of Music (London, 1943).

— 'The Minstrels of the Golden Age of Islam' (from the 'Iqd al-farīd). Islamic Culture, xvii-xviii (1943-4).

— 'An Anonymous English-Arabic Fragment on Music'. Islamic Culture, xviii (1944).

— 'The Song Captions in the Kitāb al-aghānī'. Transactions: Glasgow University Oriental Society, xv (1955).

Hanoch Avenary: 'Abu 'l-Salt's Treatise on music'. Musica Disciplina, vi (1952).

Ibn Khaldūn: Prolegomènes d'Ebn Khaldoun (Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque du Roi, xix-xxi) (Paris, 1862-8).

Ikhwān al-Ṣafā': [Risālat al-mūsīqī] Die Propaedeutik der Araber im zehnten Jahrhundert (F. Dieterici) (Berlin, 1865).

Page 558

Kosegarten, J. G. L.: Alii Ispahanensis Liber Cantilenarum Magnus (Greifswald, 1840).

Lachmann, Robert, and Mahmud el-Hefni: Ja'qūb Ibn Ishāq al-Kindī: Risāla fī ḥubr ta'līf al-alḥān: Über die Komposition der Melodien (Leipzig, 1931).

Macdonald, D. H.: 'Emotional Religion in Islām as affected by music and singing. Being a translation of a book of the 'Iḥyā 'ulūm ad-dīn' of Al-Ghazzālī'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1901-2).

Robson, James: Ancient Arabian Musical Instruments: As described by Al-Mufaḍḍal ibn Salama (9th century) in the . . . 'Kitāb al-malāḥī' . . . (Glasgow, 1938).

— Tracts on Listening to Music: Being 'Dhammm al-malāhī' by Ibn Abi'l-Dunyā and 'Bawāriq al-ilmā'' by Majd al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī al-Ghazālī (London, 1938).

Unvala, Jamshedji Maneckji: The Pahlavi Text: King Husraw and his Boy (Paris, 1921).

(ii) Books and Articles

Barbier de Meynard: 'Ibrahim, fils de Mehdi. Fragments historiques, scènes de la vie d'artiste au IIIe siècle de l'hégire . . .'. Journal Asiatique (1869).

Bartók, Béla: 'Die Volksmusik der Araber von Biskra und Umgebung'. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, ii (1919-20).

Belaiev, Viktor: Muzikalniie instrumenti Uzbekistana (Moscow, 1933).

— 'Turkish Music'. Musical Quarterly, xxi (1935).

— 'Formi Uzbekskoy Muziki'. Sovetskaya Muzika (July-August, 1935).

— 'Three Eastern Pieces'. Monthly Musical Record, lvii (1927).

— 'Turkomanian Music'. Pro musica (1927).

— and Uspensky, V.: Turkmenskaya Muzika (Moscow, 1928).

Caussin de Perceval, A.: 'Notices anecdotiques sur les principaux musiciens arabes des trois premiers siècles de l'Islamisme'. Journal Asiatique (1873).

Chottin, A.: 'Les Genres dans la Musique marocaine'. La Revue musicale du Maroc (1930).

— Corpus de Musique marocaine, I, Nouba de Ochchāk . . . (Paris, 1931).

— Corpus de Musique marocaine, II, Musique et danses berbères du Pays Chleuh (Paris, 1933).

Christensen, Arthur: 'La Vie musicale dans la civilisation des Sassanides'. Bulletin de l'Association Francaise des amis de l'Orient (Paris, 1936).

Collangettes, Xavier M.: 'Étude sur la musique arabe'. Journal Asiatique (1904, 1906).

The Encyclopaedia of Islām (Leiden, 1913-38). s.v. 'Būk', 'Duff', 'Ghīnā', 'Kīṭāra', 'Mi'zāf', 'Mizmār', 'Mūsīqī', 'Rabāb', 'Nawba', 'Ṣandj', 'Ṭabl', 'Ṭabl Khāna', 'Ṭunbūr', 'ʿUd', 'Urghan', as well as the leading singers, instrumentalists, and theorists.

Farmer, Henry George: 'Clues for the Arabian Influence on European Musical Theory'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1925) = The Arabian Influence on Musical Theory (London, 1925).

— 'The Arabic Musical Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1925).

— 'The Old Persian Musical Modes'. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1926).

— A History of Arabian Music to the XIIIth Century (London, 1929).

— 'The Influence of Music: From Arabic Sources'. Proceedings of the Musical Association, 52nd Session (1925-6).

— Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence (London, 1930).

— 'Greek Theorists of Music in Arabic Translation'. Isis, xiii (1930).

Page 559

502

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Farmer, Henry George: ‘Histoire abrégée de l'échelle de la musique arabe’. Recueil des travauix du Congrès de musique arabe . . . Caire . . . 1932 (Le Caire, 1934).

— Studies in Oriental Musical Instruments, 1st series (London, 1931); 2nd series (Glasgow, 1939).

[Persia.] ‘An Outline History of Music and Musical Theory’. A. U. Pope's A Survey of Persian Art (London, 1938).

— ‘The Jewish Debt to Arabic Writers on Music’. Islamic Culture (1941).

— The Minstrelsy of the Arabian Nights. A Study of the Music and Musicians in the Arabic ‘Alf Laila was Laila’ (Bearsden, 1945).

— ‘Ghosts: An Excursus on Arabic Musical Bibliographies’. Isis, xxxvi (1946).

— ‘Crusading Martial Music’. Music and Letters, xxx (1949).

— Oriental Studies: Mainly Musical (London, 1953).

— See also Grove's Dictionary of Music, 5th ed. (London, 1954), s.v. ‘Arabian Music’, ‘Berber Music’, ‘Egyptian Music’, ‘Iraquian and Mesopotamian Music’, ‘Maghribī Music’, ‘Mohammedan Music’, ‘Moorish Music’, ‘Persian Music’, ‘Ṣūfī and Darwīsh Music’, ‘Syrian Music’, ‘Turkestānī Music’.

Hornbostel, Erich von: ‘Phonographierte tunesische Melodien’. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, viii (1906–7).

— and Lachmann, R.: ‘Asiatische Parallelen zur Berbermusik’. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Musikwissenschaft, i (1933).

Huart, Clément: ‘Étude biographique sur trois musiciennes arabes’. Journal Asiatique (1884).

Idelsohn, A. Z.: ‘Die Maqamen der arabischen Musik’. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, xv (1913–14).

Kiesewetter, R. G.: Die Musik der Araber (Leipzig, 1842).

Kosegarten, J. G. L.: ‘Die moslemischen Schriftsteller über die Theorie der Musik’. Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, v (Bonn, 1844).

Lachmann, Robert: ‘Die Musik in den tunisischen Städten’. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, v (1923).

Land, J. P. N.: ‘Recherches sur l'histoire de la gamme arabe’. Actes du Sixième Congrès International des Orientalistes tenu en 1883 à Leide (Leiden, 1885).

— ‘Remarks on the earliest development of Arabic music’. Transactions of the Ninth Congress of Orientalists, 1892, ii (London, 1893).

— ‘Tonschriftversuche und Melodieproben aus dem muhammedanischen Mittelalter’. Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft, ii (1886).

Loewenthal, A.: Honein Ibn Ishāḳ, Sinnsprüche der Philosophen . . . ins Deutsche übertragen und erläutert (Berlin, 1896).

— Musik des Orients (Breslau, 1929).

Mitjana, Rafael: ‘La musique en Espagne’. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, iv (Paris, 1920), especially pp. 1920–5.

— ‘L'Orientalisme musical et la Musique arabe’. Le Monde Oriental (Uppsala, 1906).

Pope, A. U.: A Survey of Persian Art from Prehistoric Times to the Present (Oxford, 1938).

Ra'ūf, Yektā Bey: ‘La Musique turque’. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 2945–3064.

— Dār al-alḥān kulliyyāt (Constantinople, n.d.). Contains the compositions of the old Turkish composers.

Page 560

Ribera, Julián: La Música de las Cantigas (Madrid, 1922).

— Music in Ancient Arabia and Spain; Being ‘La Música de las Cantigas’ . . . translated and abridged by Eleanor Hague and Marion Leffingwell (Stanford University Press, U.S.A., 1929).

— La Música andaluza medieval en las canciones de trovadores, troveros y minnesinger (Madrid, 1923–5).

— Historia de la música árabe medieval y su influencia en la española (Madrid, 1927).

Rouanet, Jules: ‘La Musique arabe’. Encyclopédie de la musique (Lavignac and L. de La Laurencie), 1re partie, v (Paris, 1922), pp. 2676–2939.

— and Yafil, E. N.: Répertoire de musique arabe et maure: Collection d’Ouvertures, Mélodies, Noubet, Chansons, Préludes, Danses, etc. (Algiers, 1904 et seq.).

Sirajul Haq: ‘Samā‘ and Raqs of the Darwishers’. Islamic Culture (1944).

Villoteau, G. A.: La Description de l’Égypte: État moderne (Paris, 1809–26).

Werner, E., and Sonne, I.: ‘The Philosophy and Theory of Music, in Judaeo-Arabic Literature’. Hebrew Union College Annual, xvi, xvii (Cincinnati, 1941, 1943).

Page 561

LIST OF CONTENTS OF

THE HISTORY OF MUSIC IN SOUND

VOLUME I

The History of Music in Sound is a series of volumes of gramophone records, with explanatory booklets, designed as a companion series to the New Oxford History of Music. Each volume covers the same ground as the corresponding volume in the New Oxford History of Music, and is designed as far as possible to illustrate the music discussed therein. The records are issued in England by The Gramophone Company (H.M.V.) and in the United States by R. C. A. Victor, and the booklets are published by the Oxford University Press. The editor of Volume I of The History of Music in Sound is Egon Wellesz.

The side numbers given below are those of the 78 r.p.m. edition.

Side 1. CHINA (1): THREE ANCIENT MELODIES

(a) Tsui Wong Chan (The Strumming of an Elderly Gentleman)

(b) Lang Tau Sha (Waves Washing the Beach)

(c) Nan Tsin Kong (Entering the Palace)

Side 2. CHINA (2): INSTRUMENTAL AND DRAMATIC MUSIC

(a) The Poet Rides

(b) Meihua San Nonq (Plum Blossom)

(c) Duet from Hsiao Fang Niu (The Little Shepherd)

(d) Excerpt from Mou-Tan T'ing (The Lotus Pavilion)

Side 3. CHINA (3): OPERA

(a) Excerpt from Pai Shê Chuan (The White Serpent)

(b) Excerpt from Wu Chia P'o (Lady Precious Stream)

(c) Excerpt from Yüan-Mên Chan Tzŭ (Beheading a Son)

(d) Excerpt from Ts'ao Ch'iao Kuan (Thatched Bridge Pass)

Side 4. TIBET

(a) Lamaist Instrumental Ensemble

(b) Lamaist Chanting

(c) Hymn by Two Nuns

Side 5. CAMBODIA

(a) Bampe (Lullaby)

MADAGASCAR

(b) Raivo

Side 6. LAOS

(a) Song of Nam-Ngum Bargeman

(b) Mengphoutomdok (Buzzing of Bees)

(c) Laoh-Tenh (old dance)

(d) Thoum (Court of Love)

Page 562

CONTENTS OF HISTORY OF MUSIC IN SOUND VOL. I

505

Side 7. BALI (1)

(a) Tjroekt joek poenjah

(b) Excerpt from the music-drama Tjalonarang

Side 8. BALI (2)

(a) Excerpt from a Gamboe

TAHITI

(b) Paoa (primitive song)

(c) Aue Aue (modern dance)

Side 9. JAPAN

(a) Gagaku (Court Music): Dance of the Great Peace

(b) Rokudan (Nos. 1, 3, and 6)

(c) Chidori (The Sea Plovers)

Side 10. INDIA (1): FOLK MUSIC

(a) Rice-transplanting song (Western Ghats)

(b) Harvest Processional song (Western Ghats)

(c) Toda song (Nilgiri Mountains)

(d) Death Wail (Cape Comorin)

Side 11. INDIA (2): FOLK MUSIC

(a) Afridi song (Khyber Pass)

(b) Marathi Weaver's song (Hyderabad)

(c) Bhajan (Marathi Villagers' Prayer) (Hyderabad)

Side 12. INDIA (3): CLASSICAL MUSIC

(a) Sundari nann' indarilo (Carnatic devotional song)

(b) Pahādi (dhun)

(c) Kāñkariyé ji na māro

Side 13. INDIA (4): CLASSICAL MUSIC

Rāga Kedara (shannai)

Side 14. JEWISH MUSIC

(a) Lāme̊naššēah 'āl haggîtit (Psalm 8)

(b) Mōhôlêl kôl weḥôl joḥôl (Hymn for Hasha'na Rabba)

(c) 'Al nāhārôt boḇāl Hošehoh (Paraphrase of Psalm 137)

Side 15. ANCIENT GREECE

(a) First Delphic Hymn

(b) Epitaph of Seikilos

Side 16. MUSIC OF ISLAM (1): NEAR EAST

(a) Muezzin's Call to Prayer

(b) Taqsīm bayâti (Turkish)

(c) Bedouin song (from El Fayum)

Page 563

506

CONTENTS OF HISTORY OF MUSIC IN SOUND VOL. I

Side 17. MUSIC OF ISLAM (2): IRAQ

(a) Rahher Foudaka

(b) Ya naees el-tarfe

Side 18. MUSIC OF ISLAM (3): THE MAGHRIB

(a) Oomri Alayka (Moroccan)

(b) Alhazo Zabon (Tunisian)

(c) Fah el-banafseg (Algerian)

Page 564

INDEX

A'a't, Egyptian double reed-pipe, 269.

'Ab ('Abw), Egyptian horn, 269.

'Abbās b. al-Nasā'ī, 429.

Abbūba, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 251, 252, 424.

'Abd al-'Aziz, 432.

'Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī, 432, 442, 446, 453, 456.

-- Jāmi' al-ān (Collector of Melodies), 444, 463.

-- Kanz al-alḥān (Treasury of Melodies), 456.

Abraham di Caceres of Amsterdam, 333.

-- 'Duet for soprano and alto', 333-4.

Abramo dall' Arpa Ebreo, 327.

Abu'l-Fidā, 426 n4.

Abu'l-Ḥakam al-Bāhilī, 462.

Abū Ḥashīsha, 430.

Abu'l-Ḥusain al-Darrāj, 441.

Abu'l-Majd Muḥammad, 462.

Abū Ṣadaqa, 435.

Abū Sa'īd b. al-'Arabī, 441.

ACCLAMATIONS:

Acclamatory formulae, 310, 320.

Byzantine church, 399.

Roman, 380, 392, 399.

Tribal, Hebrew, 285, 290, 291, 307, 308.

Ackerman, Phyllis, 453 n8.

Adapa, Aṭapu, Mesopotamian tambourine, 233, 241.

Adelard of Bath, 466.

Adhān (call to prayer), 434, 439-40, 441.

Aeolian style, 382-4, 386.

Aeschylus, 392, 393, 394.

Aetna, 409.

Agathon, 387, 393, 394.

Aḥaba Rabba, 332.

Āhatanāda, 198, 199, 204.

Aḥmad Ughlū Shukrallāh, 463.

'Ai-ai Adonin', 385.

ai lanu, 251.

Ailinon, Linus-song, 251, 378.

Ajax fragment (papyrus), 351, 374.

Al, Sumerian kithara, 244.

Alal, Alū, Mesopotamian tambourine, 240, 268.

Alālu, 233.

'Alam al-Dīn Qaiṣar, 462.

'Alā ṣabāḥikum, 455 (Ex. 322).

Albright, W. F., 229, 255.

Alcaeus, 382, 390.

Alcman, 380, 391.

Alexander of Aphrodisias, 458.

Alföldi, A., 411 n8.

Alfred the Englishman, 469.

Algar, Mesopotamian kithara, 230, 236, 244.

Alhazen, see Ibn al-Haitham.

'Alī b. Sa'īd al-Andalusī, 462.

Alkindus, see al-Kindī.

'Allawayā, 429.

Allberry, C. R. C., 311 n3.

Allegro Porto, 327.

ALLELUIA FORMULA:

Jewish, 306.

Jewish origins of Christian usage, 320-1.

See also Hallel.

Alma-Tadema, Sir L., 272 n8.

Alonso, D., 474.

Alpharabius, see al-Fārābī.

Altman, C. B., 239 n10.

'Alūn, 429.

Alypius. Alypian notation, 358-63, 364, 369, 372-3.

Ambuḃaie, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 252.

Amīr Shāhī, 432.

Ammianus Marcellinus, 416.

Amr ibn Saḥl, 326.

Amundsen, L., 374.

Anagnostes, 320.

Anāhatanāda, 198, 199.

Anbūba, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 424.

Andalusia, Islamic influence in, 433.

Andalusian bandair (pandero), 430.

-- kaitāra, 430.

-- saeta, 50.

Anderson, 408 n8.

Anfār, Islamic trumpet, 434.

Angisiyyā, 426.

Angkloeng, Balinese chime-idiophone, 167, 171, 173, 183-4.

Anglade, J., 469 n8.

Anglès, H., 469, 473.

Angulo, J. de, 32 n1, 45 n3.

Animal-masks, 104, 183, 230, 236, 257-8, 467.

Animal 'speech' imitations, 123, 186, 396.

'Anonymus II', 465.

'Anonymus IV', 470, 471.

ANTIPHONY:

Arabia (jawāb), 424.

China, 131-2.

Early Christian, 307, 308, 311.

Egypt, 260, 262.

Greece, 338.

Hebrew, 285, 287, 288, 292, 302.

Mesopotamia, 234-5, 254.

Tibet, 139-40.

Page 565

508

INDEX

Anwā, 449.

Apel, Willi, 163, 408 n5, 459 n3.

Apollinaris, 417.

Apuleius, Lucius, 261.

Arabian Nights, The, 429, 433, 434, 437, 452.

Archilochus of Paros, 380, 391, 392.

Ardja, Balinese drama, 176.

Arghūl, Islamic double reed-pipe, 443.

Aristides Quintilianus, 349, 350 n2, 375, 376, 458, 465.

Aristophanes, 336, 337, 340, 362 n2, 368, 382 n1, 384, 385, 386, 387, 390-4, 396.

— The Frogs, 336, 386 n2, 392-4.

Aristotle, 277 n9, 339, 340, 388, 398, 465.

— de Anima, 458, 462, 465, 466.

— Problemata, 458.

— Pseudo-, 345 n1, 349 n2.

Aristoxenus, 281, 336-42 passim, 343-4, 347-51 passim, 357, 358, 363-4, 375, 380, 381 n1, 385, 387-9, 397, 458, 465.

Arndt, R. F. W., 56 n8.

Arnobius, 315 n4.

Arnold, T., 442 n7, 443 n5, 446 nn3, 7, 456 n4, 466 n9, 469 n9.

Ars de pulsatione lambuti, 468.

Ars nova, 331, 335.

Asābi', 448, 449.

Asias, or Asias kithara, 251.

Atambal, Al-ṭabl, drum, 468.

Atambor (At-tunbūr), drum, 468.

Atellana, 414.

Athenaeus, 238 n8, 239 nn1, 2, 251, 265, 269 n5, 280, 281, 348 n1, 381 n3, 391 n8, 397 nn1, 3, 400 n1, 401.

Auboyer, J., 162 n3, 182 nn1, 2.

Aucassin et Nicolette, 475, 476.

Augustiani, 399.

Aulos, reed-pipe, 238, 252, 261, 262, 280, 339, 346, 350, 351, 369, 377, 383, 384, 386, 391, 392, 393, 395, 398, 402; see also Tibia.

Aurigemma, S., 415 n8.

Avanaddha, Indian drums, 221-2.

Avāzāt, 449, 450.

Avenpace, see Ibn Bājja.

Averroës, see Ibn Rushd.

Avicenna, see Ibn Sīnā.

Āzāda, 426.

Bacchius, 372.

Bach, C. P. E. and W. F., 335.

Bacon, Roger, 466.

Badh1, 437.

Baechhold-Staeubli, H., 59 n8.

BAGPIPE:

India, 223.

Mesopotamia (Sūmfonyah), 245-6, 300.

Rome (Utricularius (ascaules)), 408, 414, 418.

Bahrām Gūr, 426, 427.

Baikie, J., 278.

Baillet, A. and J., 264.

Bair Jiuyih, 106, 137.

Bait al-hikma, 458.

Balāban, Persian reed-pipe, 443.

Balag, Balaggu, Mesopotamian hour-glass drum, 230, 231, 233, 234, 240.

Bamboo, 94.

— importance of in dissemination of music, 183-6.

Bamboo tubes (primitive idiophone), 34; (primitive chordophone), 36; see also Zither.

Ban (Pan), Sumerian harp, 242, 244-5, 271.

Bandharkar, Rao Sahib P. R., 205.

Bangguu, Chinese hoop-drum, 128.

Bangtzye, sonorous wooden block and genre of Chinese opera, 128-9 (Ex. 211).

Banks, E. J., 243 n2.

Barang, 166.

Bārbad of Fars, 426.

Barbat, Barbūṭ, lute, 252, 425, 446.

Barbitos, Greek lyre, 251, 252, 381.

Bardesanes, 312.

'Bargas of the Holy Mountain', 135 (Ex. 222).

Bar Ṣalībī, 424.

Basilius, 318.

Baumann, H., 32, 52.

Bazin Aîné, A. P. L., 114 n2.

Beck, J., 469 n9.

Beecham, J., 32 n7.

Beeicheu (northern songs), 112, 113 (Ex. 210).

'Bees fly across the Golden Sand River', 154 (Ex. 249).

Behn, F., 407 n3.

Belaiev, V. M., 50 n3, 452 n11, 472.

Belisarius, 412.

Bellan, Ch., 159.

Bellermann, J. F., 350 n2.

BELLS and BELL-CHIMES:

Assyria, 230, 239.

China (jong and boh), 88, 89, 90, 95-6, 101, 103, 104, 105, 108, 134.

Egypt, 267.

Korea, 142.

morris-grelots, 467.

primitive, 35.

rhythm-making grelots (Islam), 436.

Roman, 409.

wooden bells, 34.

Ben, Bent (Bin, Bint), bow-harp, 271, 273, 281.

Benzinger, I., 291 n2.

Bewer, J. A., 286 n1.

Bharata, 195, 207, 211, 213.

Page 566

Bharatanâtya, 204.

Bhatkhande, Pandit, 226.

Biqâ', 424.

Birch, S., 264 n1, 2693.

Birnbaum, E., 327 n1.

Biwa, Japanese bass-lute, 92, 147.

Blackman, A. M., 261 n1, 262 n8, 269 n1.

'Blown fifths', theory of, 14.

Boëthius, 250, 253, 465.

Boh, Chinese bells, 90, 101.

'Bok srou' ('Rice-pounding Song'), 160

(Ex. 262).

Book of Chronicles, 297.

Book of Lamentations, 294.

Book of Psalms, 288, 290-3, 299; see also Psalmody, Psalms.

Book of the Dead, 257.

Book of the Wars of the Lord, 286.

Book of Yashar, 287.

Borchardt, L., 263 n1, 266 n11, 267 n4, 268.

Bormus-song, 392.

Bosanquet, R. H. M., 205.

Bose, F., 121 n2, 164 n1.

Bourdillon, F. W., 475.

Bousset, W., 306 n3, 309 n3, 310 n2.

Bow:

bow-harp, 242, 244, 270, 271, 273, 275.

Egypt (ben, bin), 271, 273, 280.

earth-bow, 36, 50.

hunter's bow, 40, 57, 58.

Mesopotamia (ban), 242, 244-5.

musical bow, 14, 36, 57.

New Guinea, 179.

related to fanfared melodies, 179.

relation to drum, 58-59.

relation to pandore, 244-5.

Bowed gourd, 36, 157.

Box, G. H., 301 n4.

Brâhmanas, 203.

Breasted, J. H., 228, 281, 282 n1.

Breloer, B., 206.

Brendel, O., 411 n1.

Brewer, J. S., 466 n5.

Brihadâranyaka Upanishad, 46.

Brown, A. R., 28, 40 n3, 49 n1.

Browne, E. G., 426 n6, 431 n2, 432 n9.

Bruce's harps, 271.

Brugsch, H., 272 n3.

Brunner-Traut, E., 269.

Bucina, Roman horn, 407, 411, 413.

Buddhist music, Chinese, 88, 133, 134.

— — Japanese, 149.

Budge, Sir E. A. W., 267 n3, 268.

Buecher, K., 6.

Bukofzer, Manfred, 14 n3.

Bull-roarer, 9, 37, 48, 52, 58.

Bûq, Arabic horn, 425, 434, 443 (albogon), 468.

Burckhardt, J. L., 424.

Burkitt, C. F., 311 n3.

Burnet, J., 247 n2.

Burney, C. F., 305 n3, 309 n2.

Burney, Charles, 273 n7.

Burton, Sir Richard, 284 n1.

Byi, Chinese drum, 90.

Calabash (primitive aerophone), 32.

Callixenus of Rhodes, 265.

Canon (Qânûn), Islamic psaltery, 468.

Cántigas de Santa Maria, 467, 470, 473.

CANTILLATION, CHANT:

China, Buddhist, 133-4.

Egypt, 259, 280.

India, Vedic, 199-202.

Islam, 441.

Japan, Buddhist, 149-50.

Jewish, 291-3; Scriptural, 316-18;

Psalmody, 318-20; Hasidic, 331-2;

European influences, 326-9; decline, 334-5.

Mesopotamia, 231-5 passim.

primitive, 29-31.

Tibet, 139-40.

Cantor, see Precentor.

Capart, J., 273 n12.

Caracalla, 373.

Carcopino, J., 411 n7.

Carinus, 416.

Carra de Vaux, B., 460 n8, 462 n11.

Carter, Harold, 270 n8.

Cassiodorus, 404 n2, 465.

Castanets, Greek, 378; Roman, 415.

Cato the elder, 404.

CELESTAS:

Cambodia, 181.

Java, 167, 171, 172.

Korea, 181.

Siam, 181.

Censorinus, 247.

Champollion, J. F., 266, 267 n10, 268, 271 nn6, 7, 11, 12, 272 n8, 274 n3.

Chang (Jank), Persian harp, 243, 423, 425, 427 (sanj), 444.

Chansons de Guillaume IX, Les, 474.

Chappell, W., 258 n2, 272 nn7, 8, 273 n3, 410 n3.

de Chardin, P. T., 184 n2.

Charles, R. H., n3.

Charlesworth, M. P., 399 n4.

Charngsheng Dian (The Hall of Long Life) (Horng Sheng), 126.

Chārpāra (Chālpāra), Persian clappers, 442.

Chen, C. H., and S. H., 132.

Cheu, 114, 115, 119, 127.

Cheupair, 115, 127.

Chiang Un-kai, 114.

Page 567

510

INDEX

CHIME-IDIOPHONES:

distribution in E. Asia, 181–2, 188.

relation of metallophones to xylophones, 184.

See also Angkloeng, Bells and Bell-chimes, Celestas, Clappers, Cymbals,

Drum-chimes, Glockenspiel, Gongs and Gong-chimes, Iron chimes,

Lithophones, Metallophones, Rattle, Scraper, Sistrum, Xylophones.

Chinese Characters, Glossary of, 190–4.

Chingshan Chynpuu, 119.

Chingyueh, 111, 112.

Chinq, Chinese lithophone, 88, 89, 90, 92,

101, 105, 108.

Chongdwu, Chinese percussion-clapper, 89.

CHORAL SINGING, CHORUS, CHOIR:

musicians' guilds (Jewish), 297–8.

synagogue and early Christian Church, 320.

emergence of 'cantor', 'precentor',

in the ghetto, 328.

Greek secular, 300.

Roman, 399, 413.

Chordophones, Primitive:

bow, bowed gourd, earth-bow, earth-zither, 36.

Chottin, A., 2694, 4498, 4563, 47413,

Churches, Music of the Christian, 304–12,

316, 320, 324.

Chwanchyi, 126.

Chyn, Chinese zither, 89, 90, 92, 101, 103,

104, 105, 117, 123, 142, 148.

Chyr, Chinese cross-flute, 90, 108.

Cicero, 399, 401 n3, 404 n2.

Cinesias, 393, 394, 396.

CLAPPERS:

Annam, 157.

'bones', 267.

Burma, 164.

Cambodia, 162.

China, 89, 105, 185.

'clashing maces', 267.

Egypt, 256, 260, 261, 266–7.

'hands and feet', 267.

Islam, 442.

percussion, 89, 185.

Persia, 442.

Rome, 409, 414, 415.

wand-type, 267.

wooden bats, 35.

CLARINET:

modern, used in India, 223.

primitive, 37, 38.

Sumatra, 168.

Claudian, 261, 412 n4.

Clay, A. T., 423 n1.

Clement of Alexandria, 257 n6, 259,

277, 280, 302 n4, 306 n1, 308, 315 n4,

Cleonides (ps.-Euclid), 250–1, 351 n1, 376,

458, 461, 465.

Cleophon, 394.

Codex Las Huelgas, 23, 469 n4.

Codrington, R. H., 44 n1.

Coedès, G., 86 n1.

Cohen, F. L., 298 n4.

Cohen, G., 474.

'Cold Crows playing with water', 123.

Collangettes, X. M., 448 n2.

Collegium symphoniacorum, 401.

Commodus, 417.

CONCHS:

Chinese, 108.

Indian, 223.

primitive, 38, 52, 54, 55, 59.

sexual significance, 54.

symbolizing death, 52.

symbolizing sacrifice, 55.

Conductus, 469.

Confucian hymns, 142, 149.

— orchestra, 89–91, 143, 182.

— ritual music, 117, 142.

Confucius, 89.

Constantine the African, 467, 469.

Cooke, G. A., 312 n3.

Cornu, Roman horn, 407, 411, 412, 415.

Courant, M., 96 n1, 97 n1, 98 n1, 102 nn1, 2,

103, 108 n1, 113, 143, 144, 187 n5.

de Coussemaker, E., 331 n1, 445 n11,

470 n8, 471 nn1, 2, 4.

Covarrubias, M., 183 n3.

Creel, H. G., 89 n1.

Crossley-Holland, P. C., 137 n2, 142 n1.

Crotala, Egyptian idiophones, 264.

Ctesias, 239.

Ctesibius of Alexandria, 270, 281, 408 n5.

Cumming, C. G., 234.

Cumont, F., 247 n3, 276n4, 405 n4.

Cybele, 405.

CYMBALS:

Bali, 171, 176, 203.

Burma, 164.

Cambodia, 162.

China, 103, 134.

Egypt, 267 (cup, clapper), 280.

Hebrew (ẓelẓelīm, měẓiltayīm), 296,

India, 203, 221.

Islam (ṣajjat, sunuj, kaṣāt), 434, 442.

Mesopotamia (sanj), 239–40.

Phrygian, in Rome, 405.

primitive, 35.

Rome, 405, 414, 415.

Tibet, 139–40.

Page 568

Dabistān, The, 425.

Da'da't (Da'da'newt), Egyptian upper-chested harp, 272.

Dahcheu, 106, 119, 137.

Dalman, G., 288 n².

'Dàmbang dèk', ('Iron Rod' or 'Small and Tender'), 160 (Ex. 260).

Dâmodara, 197 n¹.

— Samgītadarpana, 197 nn¹⁻³, 198 nn¹, ², 205 n², 207 nn¹, ², 210 n¹, 211 n¹, 212 n¹, 214, 218 n¹, 221.

Damon, 349, 389.

Dance:

See also Mime, Mummers, Pantomime, Theatre.

dance-tree, 3, 4, 5.

Egypt, 257, 261, 266.

Greece, 383, 391, 401.

India, 197, 203–4.

Islam, 438, 441.

Japan, dance-song, 146.

Miau, 151.

Rome, 414.

Danckert, W., 31.

Daniel, F. S., 475.

Daniélou, A., 206.

Danmono, 149.

Daremberg, C., 251 n¹¹.

Darwin, Charles, 5, 6 n¹.

David da Civitâ, 327.

Davies, N. de G., 260 nn⁵, ⁶, 261 n⁴, 263 n⁸, 266 n⁴, 267 n⁵, 271 n⁴, 272 n⁴, 273 nn⁴, ⁸, 274 n⁶.

Davison, A. T., 163.

'Da-we Sing-ge' ('The lion of the moon'), 139–40 (Ex. 228).

Dawtzanq, 134.

Dead Sea Scrolls, 301.

Deb, Egyptian horn, 269.

Dechevrens, A., 123 n¹.

Deimel, A., 233, 241 n², 242.

Delphic hymns:

Paeans, 363–9, 374, 379, 398, 400.

Transcriptions, I, 363–9; II, 369.

Demetrius Phalerius, 277.

Demiéville, P., 149 n³.

Demosthenes, 400.

De musica (Pseudo-Plutarch), 379, 380 n⁶, 388, 389 n¹, 394 n², 397 n⁴.

Denomy, A. J., 475.

Densmore, F., 31 n², 32, 40 n², 44 n², 45 n¹, 48 n³, 49 n², 50 n², 54 nn³⁻⁴, 57 n².

De ortu scientiarum, 466.

Dessau, H., 401 n¹.

Dhu'l-Nūn, 441.

Diaw, 97, 98.

Diehl, E., 380 nn¹, ³, 386 n³, 396 n⁴.

Dieses, 359, 364, 388.

Dieterici, F., 434 n², ⁶, 460 n¹, 466 n³.

Dilāl, 423.

Dilruba, Indian chordophone, 225.

Dincser, O., 25, 26.

Dio Cassius, 277, 278, 372 n³.

Diodorus (citharoede), 417.

Diodorus Siculus, 247 n³, 251, 265, 276 n², 277, 280, 318.

Diogenes Laertius, 246.

Dionysius (Byzantine theorist), 372, 373.

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 337, 338, 374, 405 n³.

Dionysius of Syracuse, 396.

Dionysus, 251, 379, 383, 387, 392, 401.

Dioscorides of Samos, 409 n⁶.

Dithyramb, 377, 379, 383, 386, 387, 390–8 passim.

Dittenberger, C. F. W., 419.

'Dog follows a Deer, A', 155 (Ex. 250).

Dölger, F. J., 306 n³, 311 n².

Dol metsch, Arnold and Mabel, 476.

Doxology (Christian), 302 n², 310.

Driver, S. R., 295 n¹.

Drone, drone-pipes:

Arabia, 241.

as divine manifestation, 53.

Mesopotamia, 241, 252.

primitive, 21, 50.

providing pes of canon, 21.

Tibet, 139.

Drum:

Africa, 52.

Annam, 157.

Arabia, 423, 438.

Babylon, 230, 231.

Bali, 171, 172, 173, 181.

bull-symbolism, 230, 231.

Cambodia, 162, 181.

China, 88, 89, 90, 92, 101, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 128, 134, 185.

common objects as 'drums', 33.

'drum-language', 33, 34.

drum-orchestras, 38.

Egypt, 264, 267–8, 280.

hoop-drum, 128, 129.

hour-glass drum, 35, 39, 58, 105, 137, 172, 230, 231, 233, 234, 240, 424, 442.

India, 181, 203, 212, 215, 220, 221–2.

Islam, 424, 425, 426, 434, 438, 442, 452, 455, 468.

Japan, 148.

kettle-drum, 137, 233, 234, 240, 268, 425, 455, 468.

in magic, 48, 52, 55.

Mesopotamia, 230, 231, 233, 234, 238, 240.

Mongolia, 105.

Persia, 425, 426.

Phrygia, 405.

Page 569

512

INDEX

DRUM (cont.)

pot-drum, 33.

primitive, 33, 34, 35-36, 52, 55-57, 58.

Roman, 415.

sexual symbolism, 47-48, 52, 55, 56-57.

shaman-drum, see slit-drum.

slit-drum, 34, 55, 57, 157, 185; see also Trough.

symbolic of the god, 52, 230, 231.

symbolic of sacrifice, 52, 58.

Tibet, 137, 138, 139, 140.

tree-drum, 52, 58.

DRUM-CHIMES:

Cambodia, 164.

Duchesne, L., 304 n2.

Duff, Arabic drum, tambourine, 241, 423, 424, 443.

Duff, J. W., 414 n4.

Dufūf, Islamic tambourine, 434.

Dugmore, C. W., 304 n2.

DULCIMER:

China (yangchyn), 93.

Persia (santir), 93, 445.

Dumbalak, Persian drum, 426.

Dūnāy, Persian double-pipe, 423.

Dunbaq, Persian hour-glass drum, 240.

Dupont-Sommer, A., 301 n3.

Düring, I., 342 n4, 343 n1, 346 n1, 351 n1, 352 n3, 357 nn1, 3, 394 n3, 397 n2.

Dyi, Chinese cross-flute, 104, 112, 124, 128, 136.

Ea, 230, 231.

Earth-bow, 36.

Eastlake, F. W., 90 n4.

Ebeling, E., 233, 249, 288.

Ebert, M., 245 n6.

Eboué, M., 33.

Eckardt, A., 142, 143.

Edelstein, E. J. and L., 310 n3.

Eidos, 347, 349.

Elagabalus, 417.

Elbogen, I., 298 n3, 301 n4, 302 n1.

Elegy, Arabia, 424.

Ellag, Sumerian horn, 242.

Ellhwu, Chinese fiddle, 93, 156.

Ellis, A. J., 163 n1.

Elymos, Phrygian twin reed-pipe, 252, 405.

Embateria, 380.

'Emptying-the-Cup Music', 98, 105-6.

Emsheimer, E., 59 nn1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 135 n2, 186 n2, 187 n1.

Engel, C., 239-49 passim, 267 n13, 272 nn7, 8, 275.

Ennius, 411 n8.

Epiphanius, 438.

Epitaph of Seikilos, 369-71.

Eratocles, 349 n3.

d'Erlanger, R., 426 n9, 431 n4, 432 n9,

436 n7, 441-53 passim, 456 nn6, 7, 460 n5, 462 nn10, 11, 463 nn4, 7, 476 n1.

Erman, A., 257 n8, 258 n2, 259, 261 n9, 262 n5, 264 n2, 266 nn3, 6, 11, 269 nn2, 12, 272 nn1, 9, 274 n4, 280 n6.

Ermann, E., 48 n2.

Eršemma, 233, 234.

Eširtu, Mesopotamian harp, 243.

Esraj, Indian chordophone, 225.

'Etenraku' ('Music coming through from Heaven'), 148.

ETHOS, Doctrine of the; see also Primitive music.

Bali, 187.

China, 87, 88.

Greece, 341-2, 350, 401-2.

India, 196, 199, 201.

Islam, 433-4.

Jewish, 322-3; Hasidism, 333.

Mesopotamia, 246-7, 250-1, 253, 276, 277.

Spain, 449.

Euclid, 458, 459, 461, 465. See also Cleonides.

Euripides, 251 n10, 280, 337, 368, 374, 384, 386, 392-3, 394, 396, 399, 400.

Eustathius, 270.

Evangelarium (St. Médard), 467.

Exalted Heaven, 234.

'Faang Tzyychyi' ('Visiting Tzyychyi'), 119, 121-2 (Ex. 202).

""Fair, fair", cry the Ospreys' (Ju Tzayyuh), 105, 107 (Ex. 181).

Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, 462.

al-Fakhri, 431.

de Falla, M., 472, 473.

Fangsheang, Chinese iron-chimes, 112.

Fangshiang, 104.

al-Fārābī (Alpharabius), 442, 444, 445, 446, 451, 452, 456, 457, 459, 460, 462, 465.

  • de Scientiis, 466.

  • Kitāb al-mūsīqī al-kabīr (Grand Book of Music), 460.

Farley, M. F., 132.

Farmer, H. G., 97 n1, 232 n2, 240-5 passim, 253 n4, 269 n4, 270 n4, 274 nn1, 3, 275 n4, 279 n6, 284 n1, 322 n3, 423-72 passim.

Fasil, 106.

Faulkner, R. O., 259, 260.

Felber-Geiger, E., 200.

Fellah songs, 25-26.

Fernald, H. E., 92 n1.

FIDDLE, BOWED LUTE, Rebab:

Annam, 156.

Cambodia, 162.

China, 92, 93, 124, 125, 156.

Page 570

India, 181, 182.

Java, 167, 168, 169.

Mongolia, 136.

Naga, 155.

Sumatra, 168.

Tibet, 138.

Fife, Islamic (shāhīn), 438.

Finesinger, S. B., 296 n1, 300 n2.

Fioritura (tahāsin, zawwā’id, zuwwāq), 447, 450, 455, 456, 472.

Firdausī, 425, 426.

al-Fīrūzābādī, 425 n6.

Fischer, E., 123 n1, 124 n1, 125 n1.

‘Fisherman’s Song’, 145 (Ex. 238).

Fitzgerald, C. F., 155 n2.

Flavian, 318.

Flute; see also Recorder:

Arabia, 424, 443.

China, cross-flute, 90, 104, 108, 112, 124, 128, 136; globular flute, 88-89, 91, 92.

Egypt, 268.

Japan, 148.

Java, 148.

in magic, 48-57.

Mesopotamia, 241.

Miau, 152.

Naga, 155.

Niasan nose-flute, 170.

notation, 99, 144, 148.

Persia, 443.

primitive, 37-38.

Roman, 408.

sexual symbolism, 52, 56-57.

Folk-music and song; see also Primitive music:

Cambodia, 159.

China, 89, 131-3, 137 (Exs. 213-21).

Crete, 399.

Egypt, 266.

European, 86; influence on Jewish liturgical music, 326, 327, 330, 334.

Greece, 391-2; see also Lament.

India, 196, 226-7.

Islam, 427, 434-5.

Japan, 144-5 (Exs. 238, 239, 240).

Korea, 143-4 (Exs. 236, 237).

Mesopotamia, 256-7; see also Lament, Linus-song.

primitive song-types, 2-3, 7-8, 28-33, 38-41, 42, 45, 50-51 (Exs. 1-173).

Spain, influence on religious music, 473.

Tibet, 141 (Ex. 230).

Fox Strangways, A. H., 200 n2, 206, 214 n2, 215 n1, 216, 220.

Fraenkel, E., 392 n3.

Francke, A. H., 137 n1, 141.

Frank, Tenney, 417 n3.

B 3608

Frankfort, H., 242 n10.

Frazer, Sir J. G., 251, 378 n4.

Friedländer, L., 417 n4.

Frobenius, L., 41 n1, 48 n4.

Frontinus, 412 n3.

Fuh Mawji, 154.

Fuhrmann, E., 49 n3.

Funeral music; see also Lament:

Annam, 158.

Cambodia, 161 (Ex. 266).

China, 143 (Ex. 234).

Egypt, 261, 264.

Hebrew, 294.

Roman, 404, 413.

von Fürer Haimendorf, C., 155 n3.

Furness, C. J., 475.

Gadd, C. J., 230 n5.

Gailhard, A., 107 n1, 112 n2, 115 n1, 116 nn1-2, 129 n1.

Gaku biwa, Japanese lute, 92, 98.

Gala, Mesopotamian precentor, 231-2.

Galen, 417 n3.

Galilei, Vincenzo, 372, 454.

Galpin, 229, 230 nn3-6, 234 n6, 235 nn1, 6, 239-50 passim, 279 n2.

Gambeoh, Balinese classical drama, 176.

Gamelan, Javanese orchestra, 167, 168, 170-6, 183.

Gânas, 202.

Gangsas, Balinese metallophone, 171, 173, 174.

Gardiner, A. H., 258-9, 269 nn3, 6, 272 n3.

Garstang, J., 245 n6, 267 n16.

Gaudentius, 253, 350 n3.

Gau Ming, 115.

‘Geese descend on the Level Sands’, 123.

Geiringer, K., 468 n2.

Gendèr, Javanese celesta, 167, 171, 172.

Gènggong, Balinese Jew’s harp, 171, 186.

Gerbert of Aurillac, 469.

Gerbert, M., 50 n1, 452 n12, 467 n5, 468 nn6, 8.

Gersonides, see Levi ben Gerson.

Gevaert, F. A., 468.

al-Gharīd, 428, 436.

al-Ghazālī, 439 n1, 440.

Ghichak, bowed viol, 445.

Ghinā’, 424, 427, 436, 439, 440, 457.

Ghirbāl, Islamic tambourine, 443.

GhisLANZoni, E., 415 n5.

Gibson, E. H., 88 n8.

Gigid (Malilu), Mesopotamian vertical flute, 241.

Giglioli, G. Q., 408 n2.

Gilgamesh Epic, The, 229.

Ginsberg, H. L., 301.

Giovanni Maria ‘De Medicis’, 327.

Gipsy music, 473.

L 1

Page 571

514

INDEX

de Gironcourt, G., 156 n2, 158 n3, 159 n5,

Gišgigal, 234-5.

Glaucus of Rhegium, 379.

Glin bu, Tibetan vertical flute, 137.

Glockenspiel, 442.

Goan, Chinese double-pipe, 90.

Gobubew, V., 91 n2.

Goembang, Javanese bass-flute, 183.

Gombosi, O., 346 n1, 348 n2.

Gómez, E. G., 474.

Gonggina, Assam Jew's harp, 186.

GONGS, GONG-CHIMES:

Bali (gongs and kettle-gongs), 171, 173,

Burma, 164.

Cambodia, 181.

China, 107, 134.

Egypt, 268.

Java (gongs and kettle-gongs), 167, 169.

Niasan, 170.

primitive, 21, 35.

Sumatra, 268.

Goodrich, L. C., 90 n4.

Granet, M., 47 n5, 107 n1, 150 n1, 188 n1.

Grantang, Balinese xylophone, 173.

Graves, S. M., 132.

Gray, G. B., 306 n3.

Great Book of Songs (Ishāq al-Mauṣilī), 453.

Grébaut, M. E., 263 n2.

Greece, influence on Islam, 422, 465.

— on Palestine, 300.

Green, F. W., 268 n10.

Gregorian Chant, 318, 326, 328.

Gregory Nazianzen, 315 n4.

Gressmann, H., 290 n1.

Griffith, F. Ll., 267 n2, 273 n8.

Grimm, J. L. K., 49.

Groneman, J., 165 n1, 166 n2, 168 n1.

Grosset, J., 208.

Grousset, R., 84 n2.

Guidonian Hand, 204.

Guillaume de Machaut, 329.

Guillaume, A., 442 n7, 443 n5, 446 nn3, 7,

456 n4, 466 n6, 469 n9.

GUITAR:

Andalusian (kaitāra), 430.

Hawaiian, corrupting influence in India,

Mongolian, see Lute.

Guitarra morisca (Kaitāra 'atabiyya), 468.

Gulik, R. H. van, 88 n1, 2, 90 n3, 100 n3,

148 n3, 185 n1.

Gunkel, H., 289 n3, 291 n3, 304 n1, 305 n1.

Guo Mean, 117.

— Shiau-Shiang Shoei Yun ('Clouds over

the Rivers Shiau and Shiang'), 117-18

123 (Exs. 194-6, 205).

Gust, 332.

Hādandelli hādandōl, 288.

Hadrian, 372, 373, 417.

Hakam al-Wādi, 437.

Halhallatu, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 231,

234, 241.

Hālīl, Hebrew double reed-pipe, 293, 294,

Hallel (Ps. cxiii-cxviii), 302, 304, 318.

—, Christian, 306-7.

See also Allelula.

Halown, G., 84 n3, 87 n1, 93 n4, 187 n4.

Haly, 467.

Hanafī, 424.

Hansen, 419 n1.

de Harcourt, E., 3 n1.

Harich-Schneider, E., 144, 147, 177 n3.

al-Ḥarīrī, 452.

Harmonium, portable, 211, 225.

HARMONY:

Egypt, 278-9.

Islam, 471.

Mesopotamia, 248.

primitive, 13-14.

'Harmony of the spheres', see Ethos,

Doctrine of.

von Harnack, A., 305 n1, 311 n4.

HARP:

Annam, 162.

bow-harp, see Bow.

Burma, 243.

China, 92, 108.

concord harp, 238, 245.

Egypt, 255, 257, 258, 261, 263, 264, 265,

270-2, 274, 275, 277, 280.

Greece, 251, 252, 300, 424, 425.

ground-harp, 162.

Hebrew, 289, 293, 294, 296, 297, 300.

Islam, 425, 444, 452.

Korea, 143.

lower-chested harp, 235, 236, 237, 238,

242, 245, 270, 272, 425.

Lydia, 251, 252, 381, 398.

Mesopotamia, 235, 236-8, 242-5, 252,

253, 279.

Persia, 243, 423, 425, 427, 444.

primitive, 57, 58.

Roman, 409.

semicircular harp, 270.

shoulder harp, 270.

symbolism, 58.

upper-chested harp, 237, 238, 243,

Syria, 251, 252, 280, 424.

Harris, R., 311 n3.

Hārūn al-Rashīd, 429, 438.

Hasidism, 332-3.

Haskins, C. H., 465 n6.

Haslund-Christensen, H., 135 n2, 136.

Haug, M., 200.

Page 572

Hayashi, K., 148 n2.

Hazaj, 437.

Hazan, Hasidic cantor, 325, 331-2.

Hāzôzerāh, Hebrew trumpet, 296.

el-Hefinī, M., 459 n1, 461 n3.

Heinitz, W., 33.

Helmholtz, H., 275, 462, 464.

Heraclides Ponticus, 340 n2, 348, 382 n2, 390 n1.

Herder, J. G., 6.

Hermannus Contractus, 469.

Hermes Trismegistus, 275-6, 277.

Hermetic School, 257, 259, 275-6, 277.

Hero of Alexandria, 270, 281.

Herodotus, 259, 261-2, 264, 280.

Hery-heb, Egyptian precentor, 259.

Herzfeld, E., 243 n12.

Herzog, G., 32.

Hesiod, 376 n2.

Hesychius, 251 n6.

Heuzey, Leon, 231, 244 n12.

Hickmann, H., 263, 264 n1, 267-74 passim, 278 n5.

Hieron, 383.

Hildegard von Bingen, 10.

Hill, G. F., 300 n2.

Himyārl, 424.

Hirazyoosi, 130, 145-6, 152, 160.

Hisham b. al-Kalbī, 438.

Hita, Arcipreste de, 469.

Hocket, 38, 471.

Hoffmann, A., 113 n3.

Homer, 340, 376, 377, 379, 391, 402.

Hood, M., 165 n1, 166 n1.

Horace, 381 n1, 405 n3, 408 n2.

von Hornbostel, E. M., 14, 24, 125 n2, 130, 133, 163, 278.

Horng Sheng, 126.

Horns and Trumpets:

Africa, 32, 37.

animal, 37, 269, 296.

bamboo, 53.

bone, 137.

China, 68, 108.

curved, 139.

as divine manifestation, 53.

Egypt, 269, 270.

Etruria, 407, 411, 415.

extensible, 137.

Greece, 406.

Hebrew, 296.

India, 139, 223.

Islam, 434, 443.

leather, 406.

Mesopotamia, 238, 242, 245, 424.

pedal, 138-9.

percussion, 88.

Persia, 425, 426, 443.

primitive types, 37-38.

B 3608

Roman, 405, 406-7, 411, 412, 413, 415-16, 418.

Tibet, 137-9.

Turkey, 443.

wooden, 242, 269, 406.

Hsiao Shusien, 132.

Hucbald, 468.

Hudā', Arab caravan-song, 424.

Hughes, E. R., 109.

al-Hujwīrī, 440, 441 n1.

Hulstaert, Fr., 7.

Humbert-Lavergne, M., 153 n1.

Humbert-Sauvageot, 135 n1.

Humpkāra, 202.

Hundred Chosen Songs (Ibn Jāmi'), 437.

Hutton, J. H., 155.

Hwainantzyy, 96.

Hwang, Chinese free-reed pipe, 185, 187.

Hwang Yeoudih, 152 n1.

Hwuchyn, Chinese fiddle or bowed lute, 93, 125, 128.

Hwuyueh, 106, 111.

Hyde, W. W., 408 n7.

Hydraulus, see Organ.

Hymenaeus, 378, 392.

Hymn, Hymnody; see also Delphic hymns, Psalms:

Byzantine, 309-10, 325, 373-4.

China, 98, 100, 101-2, 134.

Christian, 308, 316, 373-4; Gnostic, 311-12; see also Psalms.

Greece (prayers), 395; see also Delphic Hymns.

Hebrew, 289, 304; synagogal, 316; Hasidic, 333; see also Psalms.

India, Rigvedic, 200-1; Sāmavedic, 201-3.

Islam, 441.

Tibet, 138.

'Hymn for the Sacrifice to Confucius', 101-2, 142 (Exs. 177, 233).

'Hymn for the Sacrifice to the Imperial Ancestors', 102 (Exs. 178, 179).

'Hymn from the Temple of the Ancestors', 103 (Ex. 180).

'Hymn to Nemesis', 372.

'Hymn to the Sun', 372.

'Hymns to the Muse', 372.

Hyon kum, Korean zither, 143.

Iamblichus, 246, 252, 275 n2.

Ibn 'Abbād al-Nafzī, 476.

Ibn 'Abd Rabbihi, 437.

Ibn 'Ā'isha, 428.

Ibn al-'Arabī, 438 n2.

Ibn Bājja (Avenpace), 462.

Ibn Bāna, 430.

Ibn Baṭṭūta, 274 n1.

Ibn al-Faqīh, 445.

L 12

Page 573

516

INDEX

Ibn Firnās, 462.

Ibn al-Haitham (Alhazen), 461.

Ibn Ḥazm, 445.

Ibn al-Ḥijāri, 466.

Ibn Jāmiʿ, 429, 435, 437.

Ibn al-Jazarī, 439.

Ibn Jubair, 440 nn4,5.

Ibn Khaldūn, 429 n13, 442, 445.

Ibn Khallikān, 429 n4, 444 n11.

Ibn al-Khaṭīb, 431.

Ibn Khurdādhbih, 423, 457.

Ibn Misjaḥ, 428, 429, 447, 448, 457.

Ibn Muḥriz, 428, 456.

Ibn al-Munajjim, 448, 457.

Ibn Mūsā al-Naṣībī, 423.

Ibn al-Naqqāsh, 462.

Ibn Qutaiba, 439.

Ibn Rushd (Averroës), 462, 466.

Ibn Saʿd, 440 n1.

Ibn Saʿid al-Maghribī, 442.

Ibn Sīda, 437.

Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna), 442, 444, 449, 450, 453, 461, 467, 471.

— al-Najāt (The Deliverance), 461.

— al-Shifāʾ (The Cure), 461.

Ibn Suraij, 428, 436, 437.

Ibn Taghribardī, 431.

Ibn Ṭaimiyya, 438.

Ibn Zaila, 440, 442, 444, 449.

— Kitāb al-kāfī fīʾl-mūsīqī (Book of Sufficiency in Music), 461.

Ibrāhīm b. al-Mahdī, Prince, 429.

Ibrāhīm al-Mauṣilī, 428, 429, 436, 437.

Idelsohn, A. Z., 298 n1, 300 n3, 3162, 317 n2, 328, 331.

Imbubu, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 241, 251, 252.

In Faaluu, 106 n1, 108, 136 n3.

Ingguu, Chinese drum, 92.

Inḥu, 233.

Iqāʿāt, 433, 448–9, 471.

IRON or METAL-PLATE CHIMES:

Cambodia, 161, 162.

China (fangsheang), 108, 112.

Isacchino Massarano, 327.

al-Iṣfahānī, 435–8 passim, 448, 451, 452, 458 n1.

Iṣḥāq al-Mauṣilī, 429, 436, 437, 452, 453, 457, 458, 459 n2.

Isidore of Seville, 320, 402.

Iṣkāru, 234.

Iwato, 130, 146, 160.

Iyar, Ramakrishna M., 200.

Jacobo Sansecondo, 327.

Jacobs, A. G., 132 n1.

Ja Fuhshi (Cha), 119, 120, 121 n1, 122 n1.

von Jan, C., 374 n3.

Jannai, 325.

Jastrow, M., 230 n1, 231 n10, 238 n1, 239 n8, 242 n8, 300 n1.

Jāti, 210–11, 213.

'Jaujiun's Lament', 137.

Jeannin, J., 469 n1.

Jeanroy, A., 473, 474.

Jehudah Halevi, 325.

Jehudai Gaon, 325.

Jeng, Chinese zither, 90, 93, 104, 123, 136, 138, 142, 145, 148.

Jenq Yih, Duke of Peh, 97.

Jerome of Moravia, 445.

JEW'S HARP:

Assam, 186 (gonggina).

Bali, 171; orchestras, 186 (genggong).

used in courtship, 154–5, 186.

used in fanfared melodies, 178–9.

in relation to free-reed development, 185–7.

Java, 170, 186.

Miau, 152.

Naga, 155.

New Guinea, 186.

Papua, 178.

primitive, 35.

Siberia, 187 (Qongon, kunka).

Sumatra, 168.

technique, 186–7.

Jiang Kwe'i, 98, 99, 100, 109.

— Nine Songs for Yueh, 109–11 (Exs. 184–6).

Jing Farng, 92, 96, 97.

Jingshih, 128–30.

Jiun, Chinese chordophone, 91, 92.

Joen, Chinese chordophone, 92, 96.

Johannan ben Zakkai, 315.

Johannes de Muris, 470.

Jones, A. E. M., 401.

Jones, H. S., 405 n3.

Jones, Sir William, 205.

Jong, Chinese bells, 90, 95–96.

Jose ben Jose, 325.

Josephus, 278, 300.

Joshua ben Hananya, 315.

Joulii (Ceremonial of the State of Jou), 87, 102.

Juba II of Numidia, 280.

Juh, Chinese trough, 89, 101, 185.

Julian, 410.

Julius Honorius, 251 n8.

al-Jurjānī, 431, 463, 465.

Ju Shii, 98, 99, 103, 104 n2, 109, 109 n2, 117, 166.

Justin Martyr, 304.

Ju Tzayyuh, Prince, 100–4, 143, 168.

Juvenal, 406, 409 n2.

Juwāq, Berber flute, 443.

Kaitāra, Andalusian lute, 430, 446.

Kaitāra 'arabiyya, 468.

Page 574

al-Kalbī, 438 n7.

Kalū (Gala), Mesopotamian precentor, 231-2, 235, 247, 254, 259.

Kamada, Takeo, 145.

Kamāncha (Kamānjā), bowed viol, 445.

Kanzabu, Mesopotamian flute, 241.

Kanz al-alhān (Treasurey of Melodies), 'Abd al-Qādir b. Ghaibī, 456.

Kanz al-tuhaf (Treasure-house of Rarities), 444, 463.

Karan, Mesopotamian horn, 242.

Karlgren, B., 91 n1, 150 n3.

Karnā, Persian trumpet, 443.

Karranāy, Persian horn, 425, 426.

Kasāt (Sajjat, sunuj), Islamic cymbals, 434, 442.

Kassar, Kasrā, Egyptian lyre, 244 n8.

Kathākali, 204.

Kaufmann, C. M., 272 n5.

Kauthumas, 202-3 (Exs. 291, 292).

Kazimirski, A. de B., 426 n15.

Kazoo (mirliton), 36.

Keh, C. S., 142, 143.

Keluri, Sarawak mouth organ, 178.

Kena'na'wr, Egyptian kithara, 273.

Ketoeng-ketoeng, Javanese zither, 167.

al-Khalīl b. Aḥmad, 451 n1, 457.

Khiḍr b. 'Abdallāh, 463.

al-Khwārizmī, 42612, 446 9.

Kiesewetter, R. G., 450, 462 n8, 463, 464 n1.

al-Kindī (Alkindus), 448, 450-1, 453, 455, 458-60, 465, 467.

King, L. W., 231, 247 n8, 250 n4, 423 n1.

Kinnarī, Indian chordophone, 224.

Kinnōr, Kinyra, harp, kithara, 273, 289, 293, 294, 296, 297, 424.

Kinsky, G., 237-45 passim, 268 n8, 271 n2, 272 n1, 443 n6, 467 n3.

Kirān, Arabic pandore, 424.

Kirby, P. K., 270 n6.

Kirby, P. R., 34, 35 n2, 38 40 n1, 55 n1.

Kircher, A., 454.

Kirtan music, 217.

Kishibe, S., 90 n4.

Kišub, 233, 234, 235.

Kitāb al-aghānī al-kabīr (Great Book of Songs) (al-Iṣfahānī), 438, 448.

Kithara; see also Lyre: asias kithara, 251.

Egypt, 257, 258, 263, 264, 272-3.

Greece, 339, 342, 346, 351, 376, 377, 381, 389, 393, 396, 397, 398.

Hebrew (kinnor), 296.

Islam (mi'zaf), 423, 424, 444.

Mesopotamia (al, algar, qithros), 230, 236, 237, 238, 242, 244, 246, 253.

Roman, 409, 413-14, 416, 418, 419.

Kiyose, Y., 146 n2.

Knosp, G., 153 n3, 156 nn1, 3, 157, 158 n1, 159 n1, 162 n2, 164 n1.

Knudtzon, J. A., 242 n4, 269 n15.

Koch-Grünberg, T., 50 n4.

Koeh, K., 56 n7, 57 n1.

Koeileei, 104, 106, 111, 127.

Kolinski, F. M., 180 n3.

Konghour, Chinese harp, 92.

Konoye, H. and N., 148 n1.

Kontakion, 310, 325.

Koouchyntsyy, Chinese free-reed whistle, 186.

Kosegarten, J. G. L., 463 n8.

Koto, Japanese zither, 149; see also Yamada koto, Yamatogoto, Soo no koto.

Kroll, J., 309 n3.

Kūba, hour-glass drum, 442.

Kuenchou, 126-30 (Ex. 209).

Kumoizyoosi, 130, 146, 165.

Kunka, East Siberian Jew's harp, 187.

Kunst, J., 14 n8, 16 n1, 56 n9; 165 n1, 170 nn1, 2, 177, 178 n1, 180 nn1, 5, 6, 183 n4, 186 nn5, 6, 188 n2, 189 n2.

Kunst-Wely, C. J. A., 170 n1.

Kurosawa, Takatomo, 179 n1.

Kūs, kettledrum, 425.

Kūsāt, kettledrum, 443.

Kuttner, F. A., 93 n2.

Kuwargā (Kürgā), kettledrum, 443.

de Laborde, J. B., 450, 454 n1.

Lach, R., 324 n1.

Lachmann, R., 14, 133, 133 n2, 316 n2, 324 n1, 446 n2, 459 n1.

al-Lādiqī, 451, 463.

Lajard, F., 236 n2.

LAMENT, dirge: Arab (bija'), 424.

Egypt, 259, Manerōs, 264-5; nehwt, 261.

Greece, 378; harmoniae employed, 395. 'Ai-ai Adonin', 385. 'Ailinon' (Linus song), 378.

Bormus song, 392.

Hebrew (ai lānū), 251, 287-8, 293-4; metre, 295.

Islam (wilwāl), 434.

Mesopotamia, 230; antiphonal, 233-4; Linus-song, 251.

'Lamentations of Isis and Nephthys', 259-60.

Lamprocles, 349, 392.

Land, J. P. N., 165 n1, 166 n2, 168 n1, 447 n7, 454 n1.

Landsberger, B., 248, 249-50.

Lane, A., 442 n8.

Lane, E. W., 439 n8, 440 n8, 441 n7.

Lane-Poole, S., 430 n9, 431 n3.

Page 575

518

INDEX

Langdon, S., 230-5 passim, 239-44 passim, 248, 249, 254, 288 n1, 292 n1.

de Lange, D., 165 n1, 166 n2, 167 n1, 168 n1, 177.

Laparra, R., 473.

La Piana, G., 405 n1.

de Lasalle, A., 426 n10.

Lasos of Hermione, 342, 382.

Last, H., 411 n5.

Lavignac, A., and de La Laurencie, L., Encyclopédie de la musique. See under individual contributors.

Layard, A. H., 239 n10.

Lector, 320.

Leenhardt, M., 3 n1.

Le Gentil, P., 475.

Leibniz, G. W., 109.

Leo Hebraeus. See Levi ben Gerson.

Leon da Modena, 327, 328.

Léonin of Paris, 471.

Lepsius, R., 256 n3, 260 n3, 262 n4, 264 n3, 266 n7, 267 nn3, 12, 269 nn1, 7, 270 n1, 271 n1, 272 n12.

Leu Buhwei, 87, 93-96.

-:- Leu Shyh Chuenchiou (Spring and Autumn of Leu Buhwei), 87, 94 n1, 2.

Lévi, S., 196.

Levi ben Gerson (Leo Hebraeus, Gersonides), 330-1.

Lévi-Provençal, 474.

Levis, J. H., 110 n1, 113 n2, 125.

Levy, Sara, 335.

Liang Borlong, 126.

Liang Tzaypyng, 123.

Libro de buen amor, 467.

Lietzmann, H., 308 n3.

Li Gotti, E., 475.

Liijih Yuehlinq, 187.

Lilis (Lilissu), Mesopotamian kettledrum, 233, 234, 240.

Lima, 166.

Limenjus of Athens, 369.

Ling Luen, 93 ff.

Linus-song (Ailinon), 251, 378, 385.

Liou Shi, 91 n3.

LITHOPHONES, STONES, and STONE-CHIMES: Annam, 156, 157.

China (chiq), 88, 89, 90, 92, 101, 105, 108.

Korea, 142.

primitive, 35.

Little Shepherd, The, 107, 115-16 (Exs. 182, 189).

LITURGICAL MUSIC, LITURGY; see also Cantillation, Hymn, Psalms: China, Buddhist, 133-4; Taoist, 134.

Early Christian, 307-11, 316, 317.

Egypt, 258-62 passim, 280.

India, Vedic, 199-204; Kirfan, 217.

Jewish, 291-3, 297 8; synagogal, 301-2, 303-7 passim, 313-24, 329; Hasidic 331-4.

Korea, Buddhist, 142.

Mesopotamia, 234-6, 254, 259-60.

'Liturgy and Prayer to the Moon God', 235.

Lituus, Roman trumpet, 407, 412.

Liuhлеу, Chinese note-series, 95-97, 100; pitch-pipes, 183-4; notation, 99.

Liu Shea-An, 133.

Livy, 410 n5, 412 n3, 414 n2.

Lloyd, Ll. S., 14 n3.

Lord's Prayer, The, 312.

Loret, C., 270.

Loret, V., 260 n4, 267 n7, 268 n11, 269, 272 n6, 273 n8, 277 n6, 278, 281 n1, 441.

Loud, G., 239 n10.

Lucian, 415 n2.

Luckenbill, D. D., 291 n1.

LUTE; see also Fiddle, Guitar, Kaitāra, Pandore, Viol: as basis of Islamic modal theory and tablature, 447-50, 468.

Cambodia, 162.

China (pipa, pyipar, sanshyan), 91, 92, 97, 98, 99, 104, 108, 109, 112, 123, 128, 136, 147, 432, 446.

as esoteric symbol, 433.

Hebrew, 294.

Islam, 423, 424, 425, 427, 433, 445, 446, 447-50, 452, 454, 468.

Japan (gaku biwa), 92, 98, 147.

Mesopotamia, 251.

Mongolia, 136.

Persia, 425, 426.

primitive, 36, 48.

Sumatra, 168.

Tibet, 138.

Luther, Martin, 128 n1.

Lyall, C. J., 427 n4.

LYRE; see also Kithara: Egypt (kassar), 244 n8.

equated with kinnor, kithara, 296; with qitharos, 300.

Greece, 300, distinguished from kithara, 338-9, 357; phorminx 376, 377, 381, 382, 394.

Mesopotamia (in doctrine of the Ethos), 250-1.

Persia (barbitos), 251, 252, 381, 390.

Roman, 409, 416.

Lysias, 400 n1.

Ma' (Met, Ma''), Egyptian reed-pipe, 269.

Maas, P., 372 n3, 400 n2.

Ma'bad, 428, 436, 437.

McCartney, E. S., 407 n2.

Page 576

Macdonald, D. B., 441 n3.

Mace, C., 256 n2, 267 n1.

McPhee, C., 170-6 passim, 183 n3, 186 n1,

187 n3, 188.

Magadis, Greek harp 251, 252.

Magen Aboth, 332.

Magna mater, 52, 408.

Mahaffy, J. P., 265 n5.

Maḥmūd, grandson of 'Abd al-Qādir b.

Ghaibī, 432.

Mākhūri, 437.

Mālik al-Ṭā'ī, 428.

Malilu, long Mesopotamian flute, 241.

Mandore, see Lute.

Manerōs, 261, 264-5.

Manichean Psalter, 311.

Manṣūr al-Yahūdī, 429.

Maqāmāt, 332, 433, 449-50, 452.

al-Maqqarī, 429 n12, 430 nn7-8, 436 n4, 10,

442 n3, 443, 462 n2, 466 n4, 467 n5.

al-Maqrīzī, 430 n7.

Marcello, Benedetto, 328.

Marcellus, 417.

Mariette, A., 263 n7.

Marrou, H.-J., 336 n2, 338 n2, 340 n1,

419 n4.

Martellotti, G., 372 n1.

Martial, 401 n4, 413.

'Martial Virtue Music', 147 (Ex. 242).

Martianus Capella, 465.

Martin, E., 371 n1.

Martin, F., 235, 241 nn5, 16, 243 n4.

Maspero, Gaston, 257, 259, 260 n2, 264,

268 n2, 276 n3, 277.

Maṣrōqīthā, Mesopotamian recorder, 238,

Massignon, L., 476.

al-Mas'ūdī, 423 n3, 424 n3, 427 n1, 442 n2.

Matsudaira, Y., 146 n1.

Mayer, R. F. H., 56 n5.

Mazū, Manzū, Mesopotamian tam-

bourine, 234, 241.

Meibom, M., 253 n1.

'Meihua San Nong' ('Plum Blossom'),

119-20, 121 (Exs. 197, 198).

Meillet, A., 195.

Meissner, B., 236 n3, 290 n1, 295 n3.

Melanippides, 393, 394.

MELODIC PATTERN AND STRUCTURE:

Annam, 156-7; fanfared, 159.

Bali, 174-6.

Burma, 164-5.

China, see Poetic form.

Islam, 450-6 passim; fioriture, 450-1.

Japan, 149.

Jewish synagogal, 316-20.

New Guinea, fanfared, 179-80.

primitive, 17-28, speech-rhythm, 31-

32; structure, 29-31.

Melodies, classification of primitive, 12-

13, 25, 39.

Melodies, fanfared, 14, 24, 31, 159, 161,

178-80, 188.

Membranophones, see Drum, Kazoo.

Mēna'ān'īm, Hebrew sistrum, 296.

Menecles, 279.

Menéndez y Pelayo, 472.

Menges, L., 59 nn 3, 5.

Menghin, O., 12.

Menyt, Egyptian clapper, 260.

Mercurelli, C., 408 n7.

Meṣi, Mesopotamian tambourine, 241.

Mesomedes of Crete, 337, 372, 373,

METALLOPHONES, i.e. metal forms of xylo-

phones; see also Bells, Celestas,

Gongs, Iron Chimes:

Bali, 171, 173, 174.

Indochina, Indonesia, 183.

in relation to aerophones, xylophones,

183-4.

Islam, 442.

Java, 167, 168, 181.

Tibet, 138.

Meyer, H. A. W., 309 nn1, 2.

Mĕziltayyim, Hebrew cymbals, 296, 297.

Migne, J.-P., 438 n6.

MILITARY MUSIC, ORCHESTRAS:

China, 103, 106.

Egypt, 266, 270.

Islam, 434, 465.

Roman, 406-7, 412-13.

MIME (farce):

Greece, 399.

Rome, 309.

See also Mummers, Pantomime.

Mingana, A., 311 n3, 424 n7.

Mīr Khāwand, 252 n2.

Mirliton (kazoo), 36.

Missinai tunes, 329.

Mitjana y Gordan, R., 467 n3, 472.

Mi'zaf, kithara, 423, 424, 444.

Mizhar, Islamic circular tambourine, 423,

424, 443.

Mizmār (Zamr), Arabian reed-pipe, 424,

Mizmōr, Hebrew penitential psalm, 233.

MODES AND SCALES:

Annam, 156, 188.

Arabia, pre-Islamic (based on pandore),

456-7.

Bali, 171, 187-8.

bamboo in relation to scale-formation,

94-95.

Cambodia, 159-62.

Chaldea, 253.

China, 87, 93-101, 130-3, 187.

diatonic, 99-100.

Page 577

520

INDEX

Modes and scales (cont.)

influence in Japan, 144-5, 147; in Siam, 163.

Javanese parallels, 166.

Liuḥleu note-series, 95-100 passim.

Yann scale of Tarng Dynasty, 97-98.

'Yellow Bell' system, 94-100 passim.

Egypt, 276-9.

Greece, 340-90.

Aristoxenian theory, 343-8, 357, in relation to notation, 363-70.

Harmoniae, 347-8, 349-63, 384-90,

392, 394, 396.

Systems: 'Perfect', 345-8, 352-3;

Ptolemaic, 351 9, in relation to notation, 359-63;

Pythagorean,

341-2, 357.

Tonoí, 347-8, 349-63; in relation to notation, 363-73;

India, 204-16.

Islam, 433-64 passim.

Japan, 'Chinese' modes, 144-5, 147.

'national', 145-7.

influence in China, 130; in Java, 165.

Java, 165-7.

Jewish, 320-4, 332.

Mesopotamia, 246-9.

Mongolia, 135.

origin of Pythagorean system, 246-7.

Persia, pre-Islamic, 426; Pythagorean, 433.

primitive, 14-17, 22.

Siam, 163.

Mond, R., 261 n7.

Monro, D. B., 348, 349 n4.

Montandon, G., 34.

Monteverdi, Claudio, 328.

de Morant, G. S., 107 n1, 112 n2, 115 n1,

116 nn1-2, 129 n1.

de Morgan, J., 241 n18, 243 nn7, 8, 244 n3,

267 n6.

Morosini, Giulio, 328.

Morphy, Conde de, 468.

Mortar, Chinese idiophone, 105.

Moule, A. C., 89 n2, 93 n2, 103 n1, 112 n1.

Mountford, J. F., 349 n4, 374 nn2, 3.

Mousikê (Musica), 340, 402-3, 457.

Mouth organ:

Borneo, 185, 186.

China (sheng), 90-92, 101, 103, 104, 112,

124, 128-2, 147, 150, 151, 153, 184, 185.

Dyak, 153.

Islam (mushtak, chubchiq), 444.

Japan (shoo), 147.

Laos, 153.

Miau, 150-1.

mouth-pipes, 32.

related to Jews' Harp, 185.

Sarawak (keluri), 178.

Mowinckel, S., 292 n2.

Mowry, Lucetta, 306 n3.

Mrdanga, Indian drum, 222.

Muʿallaqāt, The, 423.

Mueller, E. W. K., 147.

Muḥammad, 421, 427, 438.

Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-Khwārizmī,

Muḥammad b. Maḥmūd al-Āmulī,

Muḥammad b. Murād Treatise, The,

Muḥammad b. Zakariyya al-Rāzī,

Muir, W., 428 n5, 429 n3, 431 n3.

Müller, D. H., 314.

Müller, Max, 264.

Mummers, 104, 230, 236, 257-8, 309, 383,

al-Muntaṣir, 430.

al-Muqaddasī, 440.

Mūrcchanā, 210, 211.

Murray, Margaret, 257-8.

Muṣāfiq, Arabic clappers, 442.

Music, see also Ethos, Doctrine of the:

and speech, 6, 7, 22.

esoteric import, 43-51, 86, 87, 199,

201, 202, 203, 230-1, 256-7, 258-9,

274, 276 441.

identified with joy, 236, 262, 274;

with light, 46-48; with sacrifice, 46-47,

51, 230-1.

inducing effeminacy, 265.

legendary origins, 5-8, 257.

sexual dualism between instrument and

player, 51-59.

spiritual conceptions (primitive), 41-60.

spiritual conceptions, Indian, 197-9.

Musical glasses, bowls, cups, Islamic, 442.

Musicians, music, Position in Society:

Egypt, 260, 262, 264-5.

Greece, 373, 377, 391, 400-1.

Hebrew, 290-1, 298.

Islam, 423, 428, 429-32, 435, 437.

Mesopotamia, 232, 236-9.

primitive, 401.

Roman, 401, 404, 408, 410-12, 413,

415-16.

Musicians, Female:

Arabia, 423, 428.

Egypt, 260, 263-4.

Greece, 391.

Hebrew, 286, 288, 289, 294, 299.

Islam, 434, 435, 437.

Mesopotamia, 235, 238-9, 248.

Persia, 425, 426.

Rome, 413.

Musicians' Guilds, Greece, 400-1;

Hebrew, 298; Roman, 410 n1, 411, 415

n3.

Musil, A., 284 n1, 285 nn1, 2.

Mūṣṭqāl, Islamic panpipes, 443.

Page 578

al-Mu'tazz, 430.

Muwashshahāt (Al-Shushtarī), 477.

Muwattar, Arabic pandore, 424.

Myers, C. S., 177 n4.

Nadel, S., 35 n3.

al-Naḍr b. al-Ḥārith, 427.

Nafīr, Islamic horn, 443.

Nagy, L., 408 n7.

Nancheu, 112-13.

Naqqārāt, Naker, Islamic kettledrum, 434, 443, 468.

Nar (Nāru), 231-3, 235.

Nârada, 208.

Naṣb, 424.

Nashā'id, 441.

Nashīṭ, 428.

Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī, 462.

'National Song', 144 (Ex. 237).

Nature concerts, Aboriginal, 9, 21.

Nauba, 452, 453.

Naubāt andalusiyya (Gharnaṭiyya), 456.

Nauh, 424.

Naville, E., 261 n2, 268 n5.

Nāy, Persian reed-pipe, 423, 425, 443.

Nebel, nebhel, nablās, uncertain meaning, ?harp, ?psaltery, discussed, 273, 296.

= harp, 246, 251, 252, 297, 424.

= lute, 294.

= pandore, 245.

= ?psaltery, 293, 296, 297.

= viol, 290.

Neḥwt (Niyaḥat), 261.

Nem, 166.

Nero, 399, 401, 416, 417, 418-19.

NEUMS:

China, melodic accents, 113-14.

Japan, indicating pitch, 149.

Lombardic, 326.

Newberry, P. E., 271 n8.

New Year mating festivals, music for, 152.

Nicholson, R. A., 427 n3, 464 n3.

Nicomachus, 253, 278, 458, 465.

Nidhāmī, 426.

Nidhana, 202.

Niggunim, 333.

Niing Wang, Prince of Ning, 118.

  • Chyushian Shernchyi Mihpuu (Rare and Valuable Secret Treatise of an Emaciated Immortal), 118.

Nine Songs for Yueh (Jiang Kwei), 109-11.

Nippold, W., 189 n1.

Noeldeke, 438.

Nome, 369, 372, 379, 385-6, 391, 393, 395, 398.

Nomos, 250, 276.

Noo drama, 141, 148.

Norbanus Flaccus, L., 413.

Norden, E., 308 n2.

NOTATION:

China: 94-101; Taoist, 134.

Greek, 338, 351; Alypian, 358-64, 367, 369, 372, 373.

Islam, 453-4, 455, 468.

Japan, 98, 147, 148, 149.

Jewish, 316-17.

Mesopotamia, 248-50.

Tibet, Lamaist, 142.

Nūba, 106.

al-Nuwairī, 447 n5.

Nuzha, Persian psaltery, 445.

Nyk1, A. R., 474.

Obermann, J., 289 n1.

OBOE, oboe-type REED-PIPE; see also Reed-pipe:

Annam, 158, 159.

Burma, 164.

Cambodia, 162.

China (suonāh), 137.

Hebrew (hālīl), 296.

India (shannai), 223.

Java (selompret), 167.

Mesopotamia (šēm), 241.

Tibet (rgya glin), 137.

Odes of Solomon, 311, 312.

Odo of Cluny, 468.

Oesterley, W. O. E., 291 n2, 297 n2, 298 n3, 299 nn1, 4, 301 n4, 304 n2.

Oktoechos, 322, 469.

Olympus, 250, 380, 381.

Opera, Chinese, 104, 107, 112, 114-17, 126-30, 137.

Oppenheim, M. F. von, 240 n14, 244 n6.

ORCHESTRA; see also Gamelan:

Annam, 157-8, 181.

Assyria, 238.

Bali, 170-6, 181, 186.

Burma, puppet theatre, 164.

Cambodia, 159, 162, 181, 182.

China, 90 ff., 103, 104, 106, 108 (table), 112, 142, 182.

Chingyueh theatre, 112.

Confucian (Jou), 90 ff., 182.

drum, 38.

Elamite, 238.

Hann, 104.

hydraulic, 157.

idiophonic, 165, 167.

Japan, 98, 145, 148.

Java, 165, 167.

Jew's harp, 186.

Koelei puppet theatre, 104, 106.

Korea, 142.

military, 103, 266, 270, 406-7, 412-13, 434, 465.

Noo theatre, 148.

Page 579

522

Orchestra (cont.)

panpipe, 38, 50.

primitive, 37-38.

Roman theatre, 415-16.

Siam, 163, 181.

Sumatra, 168.

Tarng, 108.

Tibet, 139.

Organ:

pneumatic, 408, 444.

portative, 444.

water (hydraulis), 270, 398, 408, 409-10, 415, 418, 444, 465.

Organum, 102, 450, 471-2.

Orpheus, 250, 381.

Ottoboni Codex 59, 371, 372.

Ouseley, W., 426 n8.

Ovid, 252, 405 n3, 410 n4.

Paean, 351, 363-9, 374, 375, 377, 379, 395.

Pakhawaj, Indian cylindrical drum, 222.

Palencia, A. G., 474.

Palgah (Pelāggā), Mesopotamian hour-glass drum, 240, 424.

Pandero (Bandair), Andalusian tambourine, 430, 443.

Pandore, Pandoura:

as basis of Systematist Theory, 462-4.

derivation of names, 244-5.

Egypt, 261, 263-4, 275.

in relation to organum, 472.

in relation to 'pagan' scale, 456.

Islam, 423, 424, 425, 427, 446-7, 456-8, 462, 468.

Mesopotamia, 236, 244, 245.

Persia, 425, 427.

Roman, 409, 418.

Panharmonium, experimental Greek chordophone, 396.

Panpipes:

China (shiau), 90, 92, 184.

Egypt (shu'aibiyya), 443.

Greece (syrinx), 377.

Islam (mūstqāl), 443.

Java, 167-8.

magical use, 48.

orchestras, 38, 50.

primitive, 3, 14, 37.

Rome (syrinx), 408-9, 414, 415.

South America, 184.

Turkey (mithqāl), 443.

Pantomime, Roman, 399, 415.

Papyrus texts:

Egypt, 'Songs of Isis and Nephthys', 259.

Papyrus Bremner-Rhind, 259.

of Greek music, 337-3, 351, 373-4, 384 n3, 402, 415, 419.

'Ajax' fragment, 351, 374.

'Berlin' paean fragment, 374.

Papyrus Michiganensis, 374.

Papyrus Osloensis, 374.

Papyrus Oxyrhynchus, 308, 373-4.

Papyrus Rainer, 374.

Papyrus Zenor, 374.

Paribeni, R., 405 n1.

Paris, G., 475.

Parisot, J., 440 nn3, 2.

Parry, Sir Hubert, 462.

Pasquali, G., 403 n1.

Pater, Walter, 475.

Patton, J. H., 389 n2.

von Pauly, A. F., 416 n4.

Pavlovskij, A., 445 n8.

Peak prāmpel ('Seven Words'), 160 (Ex. 261).

Pearl, O. M., 374 n4.

Pectis, Lydian harp, 251, 252, 381, 398.

Pedrell, F., 472, 473.

Pei Wen-Chung, 184 n2.

Pélaqaud, F., 232, 243 n10, 424 nn6, 8.

Pelog, 165-6, 174, 176, 179, 188.

Pengawak, 174.

Pengawit, 174.

Pengètjèt, 174.

Percussion wands, stamping-sticks, 34, 35, 424, 436, 442.

Perés, H., 474.

Peri, N., 146 n3, 148 n5.

Persia, musical influence on Arabia, 425-9.

Pēsantērīn, Hebrew harp, 300.

Peterson, E., 307 n1, 310 n4.

Petrie, W. M. Flinders, 261 n6, 267 nn6, 9; 271 n2, 273 n8.

Petronius, 413.

Pfeiffer, R. H., 286 n1, 300 n1, 301 n1.

Philby, St. John, 284 n1.

Philo Judæus, 247, 278, 301.

Philoxenus, 337, 386, 394, 396, 397, 398.

Phoinix, Greek harp, 251, 280, 424, 425.

Phorminx, Greek lyre, 376, 377, 381, 382, 394.

Photinx, Alexandrian reed-pipe, 280.

Phra Chen Duriyanga, 163 n3.

Phrynichus, 391, 392.

Phrynis, 393, 394, 396.

Pickard-Cambridge, A. W., 379 n3, 401 n1.

Picken, L., 472.

Pidal, R. M., 474.

Piggott, F. T., 144, 147 n1, 148 n6, 149 n1, 2.

Pinches, T. G., 249.

Pindar, 336, 377, 379, 380, 381-3, 388, 390, 402.

Pindaric ode, 339, 391.

P'ip'a, Chinese lute, 432, 446.

Pisha, Persian small flute, 443.

Page 580

Pitch:

China, 87, 93-94, 95, 183-4.

Egypt, 275.

Greece, 348-52.

India, 211-12.

Islam, 453-5.

Japan, 149.

Java, 165; Bali, 172.

Miau, 151.

Niasan, 170.

Pittu (Pitu), Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 242, 252.

Piyyutim, 324.

Plato, 253, 265, 276, 277 n11, 336, 338-40, 341, 342, 343, 348, 349, 378, 384-7, 390, 392, 395, 396, 398, 401.

Plectrum, types of Egyptian, 274-5.

Pliny the Younger, 311, 413.

'Plum Branch, The', 149 (Ex. 243).

Plutarch, 253, 257, 258 n4, 8, 270, 270 n1, 324, 345 n1, 375 n1, 379 n1, 398 n4, 401 n2, 410 nn4, 5, 415.

  • Pseudo-, 250, 251 n10, 379, 380 n5, 388, 389 n1, 394 n2.

Poetic form in relation to Melody:

China:

cheu, 114-15, 119, 127.

pyngtseh, 113-14.

tsyr, 113-14, 125, 128.

Greece, 363-86 passim, 390-6 passim.

Aeolian, 382-3.

dirge, 378, 384, 392.

dithyramb, 377, 379, 391, 393, 395, 396.

drinking songs (scolia), 384, 391.

lyric monody, 393.

nome, 379, 381, 391, 393, 395.

ode, 380, 390, 395.

paean, 363-9, 395.

rhythmography, 371.

India, 219-20.

Islam, 449, 450.

Jewish, Biblical, 293-5, 308-11; synagogal, 316-18, 324-6.

Pollux, Julius, 245, 278 n6, 280, 411-12.

Polo, Marco, 168.

Polotsky, H., 311 n3.

Polybius, 398 n6, 405, 406 n1.

Polyidus, 399.

Polyphony, lyrical, 295.

  • in New Guinea, 180.

  • in scriptural cantillation, 318.

  • primitive, 13, 20-22, 51.

Pope, A. U., 245 n6, 425 n8, 426 nn3, 5, 7, 431 nn5, 6, 432 nn4, 7, 443 n3, 444 n6, 446 n3.

Pope, I., 473, 475, 476.

Porphyry, 252 n1.

'Possessed, The', 153 (Ex. 248).

Potapov, P., 56 nn3, 5.

Powell, J. U., 391 n6.

Pranava, 202.

Prastāva, 202.

Pratihāra, 202.

Pratinās, 382-4, 386.

Precentor; see also Cantillation:

China, Buddhist, 134.

Early Church, anagnostes, cantor, lector, psalmista, 320.

Egypt, hery-heb, 259; chanter, 277.

Jewish, 285, 316; cantor, 320; hazan, 325, 331-2; sheliach tsibbur, 320.

India (Vedic), udgātar, 202.

Mesopotamia, gala, 231-2; kalū, 231-235, 247, 254, 259; nāru, 232-3, 235; zammēru, 231, 232-3.

Preuss, Th., 40 n9, 46, 47, 54.

Primitive music, 1-82:

related to animism, 256-7.

survivals in Cambodia, 159, 161.

survivals in Egypt, 255-8.

survivals in Indian Archipelago, 176-7.

survivals in Mesopotamia, 229-31.

survivals in Negrito civilization, 179-80.

Proclus, 277 n10.

Procopius, 412.

Prolation, Principle of, 331.

Pronomus of Thebes, 380.

Psalmista, 320.

Psalmody:

Christian compared with Jewish, 316.

Jewish, 306.

ancient tunes preserved by Marcello, 328-9.

instrumental accompaniment, 291, 297, 299, 302, 315, 320.

metrical structure in relation to cantillation, 294-5, 305, 309-10, 312, 313-14.

place in acts of worship, private, 306; Temple, 291-3, 298-9; synagogue, 301, 304, 313, 318.

Tones, 318-19, 324.

decline in favour of metrical chant, 324-6.

Psalms:

Apocryphal, 301.

Biblical; see also Book of Psalms:

for various occasions, 288, 290-3, 298-9, 301.

place in acts of Jewish worship, 291-3, 298-9, 301, 304, 313, 318, 328-9.

types of, 291-3.

Christian usage, 304-7, 311-12, 316.

Gnostic, 311.

Mesopotamian, 230, 233, 254.

Psalms of Solomon, 301, 305.

Psalterium Aureum, 467.

Page 581

524

INDEX

Psaltery:

China (yātūghān), 432, 446.

Hebrew (? nebel), 293, 296, 297.

Islam (qānūn), 444–5, 468.

Persia (nuzha), 445.

Pṣantrīn, upper-chested harp, 246; pṣan-tṛn ṣūmfonyāh, concord harp, 238, 245–6.

Ptolemy, 281, 342, 345–6, 351–2, 355–8, 360, 361, 456 n7, 458, 459, 465.

Pukku, Ellag, Mesopotamian horn (or drum), 242.

Pulleyblank, E. G., 105 n1.

Puppet-theatres:

Burma, 164.

China, chingyueh, 111–12; koeelei, 104, 106, 111, 127.

Pusey, E. B., 245.

‘Puuan Jow’, (‘The Spell of Puuan’, or ‘Universal Benediction’), 120, 121 n1, 122 (Exs. 199, 203).

Pygmies, 21, 29, 178.

Pyipar, Chinese lute, 91, 92, 97, 98, 99, 104, 108, 109, 112, 123, 128.

Pyipar Jih (The Story of the Lute) (Gau Ming), 115, 127.

Pyngtseh, 113–14.

Pythagoras of Samos, 246, 247, 252–3, 275, 278, 279, 341.

Pythagorean scale in Islam, 433, 450, 457, 458, 459, 464, 468.

Pythagoras of Zacynthus, 396.

Qadīb, rhythmic wand, 424, 436, 442.

Qānūn, psaltery, 444–5, 468.

Qarnā, Mesopotamian horn, 238, 245, 424.

Qaṣaba, Mesopotamian flute, 241.

Qemqem, Egyptian kettledrum, 268.

Qināh, 295.

Qithārôs, Hebrew kithara, 300.

Qithros, Mesopotamian kithara, 238, 245.

Qongon, Jew’s harp, 187.

Quasten, J., 303 n1, 306 n1, 310 n1, 412 n7.

Quibell, J. E., 268 n10.

Quintilian, 399, 411 n4.

Quintus Curtius, 239.

Qul-i Muḥammad, 432.

Qūpūz, Turkoman mandore, 430, 446.

Qur’ān, The, 427, 434, 437, 439, 440.

Quṣṣāba, Arab flute, 424, 443.

Quṣṭa b. Lūqā, 459.

Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, 463.

Rabab, rabē, Islamic bowed viol, 445, 446, 468.

Raffles, T. S., 183.

Rāga (rāginī), 25, 106, 212–16, 225, 226.

Rag dun, Tibetan horn, 137.

Ramal, 437.

Ramman, 231, 258.

Rana śṛṅga, Indian horn, 139.

Randall-MacIver, D., 256 n2, 267 n1.

Rattle, 34–35, 37, 44, 45, 54, 55, 240 2.

Rattray, R. S., 33.

Ra’ūf Yektā Bey, 432 n8, 456 n2, 463.

Rawlinson, G., 237 n4.

Rebab, Persian spike-fiddle, 167, 168, 169, 176, 181, 182.

Rebec, rybybe, 445, 468.

Rebours, J. B., 332 n2.

Recorder, vertical flute; see also Flute:

Arabia, 423.

China (shiau), 90, 92, 101, 108.

Egypt (wa’yr), 269.

Hebrew (’ûgābh), 289, 296.

Mesopotamia (gigid), 241; (mašrōqīthā), 238, 245; (ṣaffāra), 245, 423; (shab-bāba), 245, 443 (tig), 233, 241.

primitive, 38.

Tibet (glin bu), 137.

Reed-pipe; see also Oboe:

Alexandria (photinx), 280.

Arabia, 423, 424, 425.

Bali, 176.

Cambodia, 162, 185.

China, 90, 185, 187.

development of free reed, 185–7.

Egypt, 261, 262, 264, 265, 266, 268–9, 275, 278, 280.

Greece (aulos), 238, 252, 261, 262, 280, 339, 346, 350, 351, 369, 377, 383, 384, 386, 391, 392, 393, 395, 398, 402. See also Rome, Syria (tibia).

Hebrew, 289.

India, 222–3.

Islam, 423, 425, 443.

Java, 183.

Mesopotamia, 230–1, 234, 238, 241, 242, 251, 252, 424.

Persia, 423, 425, 443.

Phrygia (elymos), 252, 405.

Roman (tibia or aulos), 404, 405, 408, 410–11, 424.

sexual symbolism, 230–1.

Syria (tibia), 238.

Reese, G., 270 n3, 273 n8, 470 n4, 471.

Reinach, T., 341 n1, 374 n2, 379 n1, 380 n8.

Reisner, G., 233, 249.

Réjong, Balinese kettle-gong, 171, 172, 173.

Rgya glin, Tibetan oboe, 137.

Rhythmic wand, 424, 436, 442.

Riaño, J. F., 244 n3, 445 n8, 467 nn8, 7.

Ribera, J., 435 n2, 467 n7, 469 n8, 470, 470 n3, 471, 474.

Riccobono, S., 410 n4.

Riḍwān Shāh, 432.

Riemann, 462 n12.

Page 582

Rigveda, 58 n2, 200-1.

Rio, F. A., 327 n3.

Ritter, H., 441.

Ritusen, 145.

Rivoira, G. T., 467 n4.

Rkañ duñ, Tibetan trumpet, 137.

Rkpratišākhya, 195.

Robert, 415 n2.

Robinson, K., 83 n1.

Robson, J., 425 n4, 427 n5, 443 n1.

Rock, J. F., 154 n2, 155 n1.

Romanus, 325 n2.

Roscher, W. H., 280 n4.

Rosellini, I., 266, 271 nn6, 10, 272 n12, 277 n3.

Rostovtzeff, M. I., 416 n4.

Roth, C., 327 n2.

Rouanet, J., 440 n8, 441 n7, 456 n3.

Rousseau, J.-J., 6.

Rowbotham, J. F., 242 n13.

Rubāb, Persian lute, 425, 446.

Rubèba, viol, 445.

Ruiz, Juan, 467 n6, 469 n10.

'Running Water', 156 (Ex. 252).

Rūyin, nāy, Islamic reed-pipe, 425.

Ryosen, 145.

Saadya Gaon, 322.

Sabbekā, lower-chested harp, 238, 245, 252.

Sacadas of Argos, 380.

Sachs, C., 34-37 passim, 52-58 passim, 84-89 passim, 93 n1, 101, 102, 108, 131 n1, 139 n1, 141 n2, 144, 145 n3, 148 n4, 154 n1, 155 n5, 162-6 passim, 172 nn2, 3, 5, 180-5 passim, 229, 243-50 passim, 257 n4, 258 nn2, 3, 262, 263, 267-73 passim, 279, 295 n2, 296 n1, 325 n3, 345 n1, 346 n1, 380 n8, 414 n1, 446 n2, 468 n2.

Saeta, Andalusian, 50.

Ikhwān al-Ṣafā, 437, 460, 465.

Ṣaffāra, Mesopotamian recorder, 245, 423.

Ṣafī al-Dīn 'Abd al-Mu'min, 431, 433, 445, 449, 451, 454, 455, 462-4.

  • Kitāb al-adwār (Book of Modes), 454-5, 462.

  • Risālat al-sharafiyya, &c. (Sharafian Treatise on Harmonic Relations), 449, 462.

Saglio, E., 251 n11.

St. Jerome, 245.

St. Nilus, 438.

Saionji, Y., 145 n2.

Sallust, 401 n3.

Salomonis, E., 50 n1.

Salpinx, Greek trumpet, 406.

Sāmaveda, 201-2.

Sambamoorthy, P., 218.

Sambuca, sambyke, Syrian harp, 251, 252, 424.

Samgītadarpaṇa, see Dāmodara.

Samgītaratnākara, see Śārngadeva.

Saminsky, L., 314 n1.

Sanj, Arabic cymbal, 240.

Ṣanj ṣini, Chinese metallophone, 442.

Sanshyan, Chinese plucked lute, 93, 128, 136.

Santir, Persian dulcimer, 93, 445.

Sappho, 382.

al-Sarakhsī, 459.

Sarangi, Indian chordophone, 224, 225 n1.

Śārngadeva, 197 n1.

  • Samgītaratnākara, 196, 197, 198 nn1, 2, 205, 206 n6, 207 nn1, 2, 208, 210, 211 n1, 212 n1, 218 n1.

Sarod, Indian chordophone, 224.

Sarpa, Indian horn, 223.

Sarton, G., 471 n3.

de Sarzec, E., 244 n12.

Sauni, Burmese harp, 243.

Savina, F., 152 n2.

Sayce, A. H., 259 nn3, 4.

Sāz-i alwāh-i fūlād, glockenspiel, 442.

Scabellum, Roman clapper, 409, 414, 415

Schaeffner, P. A., 8, 34, 54, 56 n6, 58 n5, 188 n3.

Schebesta, P., 4.

Scheidl, V., 244 n1.

Schlegel, F., 10.

Schlesinger, Kathleen, 168 n2, 380 n6, 457 n3.

Schmid, E. F., 335 n1.

Schmidt, J. G., 33, 56 nn4, 6.

Schmidt, W., 6.

Schneider, M., 17 n1, 22 n1, 32 n4, 41 n3, 45 n1, 47 n1, 51 n1, 54 n1, 55 n2.

Schrader, E., 236 n5, 237 nn1, 3, 5, 6, 238 n4.

Schünemann, G., 335 n1.

Scolia, 380, 391.

Scraper, Chinese, 89, 101, 105, 185; primitive, 34, 46, 51.

Seami, 148.

Seba' (Seby), Egyptian flute, 268.

Seelig, P. J., 163.

Seh, Chinese zither, 89, 90, 92, 101, 103-6, 117, 142.

Sehem, Egyptian sistrum, 260, 267.

Sehpuu (Music for the Seh) (Shyong Pern-glai), 117.

Selah, 234, 292.

Selompret, Javanese oboe, 167.

Sem Ḫalḫallatu, Mesopotamian oboe, 241.

Šer, Egyptian tambourine, 268.

Seššet, Egyptian sistrum, 260, 267, 280.

Setar, Indian chordophone, 214, 224.

Page 583

526

INDEX

Sethe, K., 269 n3.

Seven Fortresses (Ma'bad), 437.

Seven Songs (Ibn Suraij), 437.

Severus Alexander, 418.

Shabbāba, Mesopotamian recorder, 245, 443.

Shāhīn, Islamic fife, 438.

Shāhrūd, Arabic arch-lute, 446.

Shaipūr, Persian trumpet, 225, 426.

Shaman, 35, 40, 45, 59.

Shaman drum, 35.

Shams al-Dīn al-Sa‘dawī al-Dhahabī, 454.

Shamsī, Chelebī, 447.

Shannai (Surnahī), Indian oboe, 223.

Shaqshaq, Arabian rattle, 240 n2.

Sharpe, S., 261 n10.

Shashtār, Arabic lute, 446.

Shawm:

Islamic (zurmūr), 434, 443.

Persian (surnā), 423, 427.

Sheau cheu, 119.

Sheliach tsibbur, 320.

Shells (idiophone), 34.

Sheng, Chinese mouth organ. 90-92, 112, 124, 150, 151, 153, 185.

Shen Iau, 113.

Shiah Cherngdao, 109 n4.

Shiau, Chinese panpipes, 90, 104.

—, Chinese vertical flute, 90, 92, 101, 104.

Shidirghū, Chinese lute, 432, 446.

Shieh Yuanhwai, 114, 125.

Shihāb al-Dīn, 445 n1, 447 n5.

Shīrīn, 426.

Shiuantzong, Emperor, 106, 107, 109.

Shiun, Chinese globular flute, 88, 91, 92.

Shoeimodiaw, 126.

Shoo, Japanese mouth organ, 147.

Shôphar, Hebrew horn, 296.

Shu'āb, 449, 450.

Shu'diāyya, Egyptian panpipes, 443.

Shudūd, 449.

Shuenn, Emperor, 101.

Shujing, Yushu Yihjyi (Canon of Documents), 101.

Shuqaifāt, Islamic clappers, 442.

al-Shushtarī, 476, 477.

Shyjing (Book of Songs), 89, 104-5, 109, 150, 184, 185.

Shyong Pernglai, 117.

Shyu Yuanbair, 119.

Sibītu, Mesopotamian harp, 243.

Sichel, A., 177 n3.

Sievers, E., 313.

Simonides, 388, 391.

Simpson, Christopher, 476.

Sinnitu, Mesopotamian reed-pipe, 241.

Sirajul Haq, 438 n10.

Sissatu, Mesopotamian harp, 243.

Sistrum:

Egypt, 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, 280, 282.

Mesopotamia, 236, 239.

Roman, 409.

Hebrew, 296.

Slendro (Salendro), 166, 176.

'Slim Cambodian, The', 163 (Ex. 268).

Slit-drum, 34, 55, 57, 157, 185; see also Trough.

Smith, R. Payne, 444 n12.

Smith, Sidney, 235.

Snelle-man, F. F., 165 n1, 166 n2, 167 n1, 168 n1, 177.

Socrates (Church historian), 311.

'Sol-fa', system used in China and Japan, 101; not derived from Islam, 471.

Solmization in Greece, 345, 352 n2, 353.

Solomone de' Rossi il Ebreo, 327, 328.

Somervell, T. H., 141.

Song, vocal music; see also Cantillation, Ethos, Folk-song, Hymnody, Opera, Primitive music, Psalmody, Theatre:

Annam, 158 (Exs. 256-8).

Arabia, 424, 427.

Borneo, 177.

Cambodia, 159-60 (Exs. 260-6).

China, 89, 104-15 (Exs. 181-6, 209-11).

Egypt, 260, 261-2, 264, 266.

fellah, 25-26.

Greece (in Palestine), 300, 338-9, 341, 343, 348, 378, 380, 383-5 passim, 391, 400, 402.

India, 196-204, 226-7.

Islam, 423-4, 434-40 passim, 451-2.

Japan, 49-50.

Jewish, 284-91 passim, 307, 315, 320, 333.

Mesopotamia, 236-8 passim, 256-7.

Miau, 150.

Mongolia, 136.

primitive, 2-3, 7-8, 11, 14, 17-20, 28-33, 38-41, 42, 45, 50-51 (Exs. 1-173 passim).

Sparta, 380.

Tibet, 137-42 (Exs. 225-32).

'Song of Chingis Khan', 135-6 (Ex. 223).

'Song of Deborah', 286.

'Song of Lamech', 285.

'Song of Miriam', 286.

Song of Songs, 300.

'Song of the Harper', 264.

'Song of the Rising Sun and the Abiding Moon', 143-4 (Ex. 236).

'Song of the Well', 285.

'Songs of Ascent', (Pss. 120-34), 314.

'Songs of Isis and Mephthys', 259.

Sonne, I., 322 n2, 325 n3, 434 n3, 466 n2.

Sonnette (idiophone), 239.

Soo no koto, Japanese zither, 145.

Page 584

INDEX

527

Souenk'ai-ti, 104 n1, 106 n2, 111 n2, 186 n4.

Soul:

acoustic nature, 10.

influenced by music, 440-1.

universal, residing in song, 33.

Sound-languages, primitive, 6-8, 32.

Spain:

disseminator of Islamic culture, 465, 466.

influence on Arab provinces, 430, 442.

Islamic influence in, 422, 429, 445, 446, 453, 459, 462, 472-5.

Islamic instruments in, 467-8.

Islamic melodic modes in, 449.

Jewish influence in, 325-6.

Speck, G., 45 n1.

Speech, forerunner of music, 5-7, 31-32.

Spencer, Herbert, 6.

Spies, W., 176 nn3-4, 183 n1, 186 n5.

Spitzer, L., 474.

Spondeion, 380, 388.

Spondeiakos, Tonos, 324.

'Spring Breezes', 156-7 (Ex. 253).

Sringa, Indian horn, 223.

Staff-notation (western) in China, 101; Islamic, 453-4, 455.

Stanley, A., 134 n1.

Steiger, 332.

Steinmann, A., 56 n1, 58 n4.

Stern, S., 474.

Stesichorus, 380, 390.

Story of the Laundress of Fine Textiles, The (Liang Borlong and Wey Lianfuu), 126.

Strabo, 250, 251, 261, 262, 265 nn1, 6, 425.

Street Cries, Chinese, 130-1.

Street musicians, Rome, 409 n6, 414.

Strehlow, C., 47 n2, 58 n6.

Strong, E., 405 n3, 411 n3, 412 n6.

Stumpf, C., 6, 135 n4, 163.

Suetonius, 418, 399 n3, 401 n2, 417 n1, 418.

Sukenik, E. L., 301 n3.

Su-ki-nyi-ma ('Lady, bright as the sun'), 139 (Ex. 227).

Sūmpōnyāh (Symphonia), 300. See Bagpipes.

Suonah, Chinese oboe, 137.

Sūr, Mesopotamian horn, 245.

Surnā (Surnāy, Zurnā), Persian shawm, 423, 427, 443.

Suşira, Indian wind instruments, 221, 222-3.

al-Suyūti, 439 n7.

'Svayambhunāth-stotra', 220.

Swete, H. B., 304 n3.

Symaa Chian, 87, 88 n1, 94, 96, 188.

Ṭabālu, Mesopotamian drum, 240.

Ṭabīra, Persian drum, 425, 426.

Ṭabl, Arabic drum, 240, 423, 438, 442, 455, 468.

Ṭablā, pair of drums, 222, 424.

Tabor, 468.

Tabret, 241, 293, 294.

Tacitus, 401 n3.

Tagore, R., 226.

Tagore, S. M., 205 n3.

Ṭahāsin, see Fioritura.

Tahlil, 438.

Taittirīya-āraṇvaka, 200.

Takeda, Chūchirō, 135 n3.

Talbiyya, 438.

Tambourine, TABRET, TIMBREL, HAND-DRUM:

Andalusia (pandero), 430, 443.

China, 90.

Egypt, 260, 261, 264, 268.

Hebrew, 296.

Islam, 434, 443, 452, 455.

Mesopotamia, 233, 234, 236, 240, 268.

Phrygian, 405.

Roman, 409, 414.

Ṭambūr, Persian pandore, 425.

Tambura, Indian chordophone, 181, 224.

Tanabe, E., 105 n3.

Ṭanbūr, Ṭunbūr, pandore, 423, 425, 427, 446-7; (atambor), 468.

Ṭann (Ṭanīn), Arabian drone-pipe, 241.

Tannery, Paul, 270 n7.

Taqsīm, 476.

Tarkīb, 450, 471, 472.

Tarn, W. W., 419 n2.

Tarngshu (Tarng History), 98, 105, 164.

Taur, Chinese hand-drum, 90.

Taylor, A. E., 241 n1.

Teben, Egyptian drum, 268.

Tefilla, 301, 332.

Tegethoff, F., 7.

Telephanes, 400.

Telesias of Thebes, 397.

Telestes, 386, 390.

Tenella kallinike, 380, 392.

Terence, 252, 414 n3.

Terpander, 250-1, 252, 381, 382.

Terpnus, 399, 417, 418.

Tertullian, 306 n1.

Tessman, G., 32 n6.

Thābit b. Qurra, 459.

Thackeray, H. St. J., 298 n4, 301 n1.

Thaqāl, 436-7.

Theatre, Music in the:

Bali (gamboeh, ardja), 176.

Burma, puppet-theatre, 164.

China (chingyüeh), 112; (koeilei) puppet-theatre, 104, 106, 111, 127, 186;

Tarng 'Pear Garden', 106-7.

Japan (Noo drama), 141, 148.

India (kathākali, yakṣagāna), 204.

Page 585

528

INDEX

Themistius, 458.

Theocritus, 384.

Theophrastus, 402.

Thomas, Bertram, 284 n1, 286 n2.

Thrasyllus, 350.

'Three Maidens', 437.

Thucydides, 380 n2.

Thureau-Dangin, F., 231, 240 nn7, 8.

Thymelici, 300.

Tibia, Roman reed-pipe, 238, 404, 405, 408, 410-11, 424.

Tibullus, 280.

Tig, Tigi, Tigu, Mesopotamian vertical flute, 233, 241.

Timbrel, 241, 286, 293.

Timbūtu, Mesopotamian drum, 240.

TIME, RHYTHM:

Annam, 157.

Cambodia, 160-1.

China, 113-14, 127.

Greece, 363-86 passim, 390-6 passim; rhythmography, 371.

India, 216-20.

Islam, rhythmic modes, 448-50, 454-6.

Jewish, Biblical, 294-5, 305, 308-10; synagogal, 316-18.

Miau, 151-2.

Mongolia, 135.

Tibet, 138-41.

Timotheus of Miletus, 337, 369, 394, 396-9.

Tjoengklik, Balinese xylophone, 173.

Tōph, Hebrew timbrel, 241, 293, 294, 296.

de Torhout, N., 135 n1.

Torrey, C. C., 305 n3, 312 n3.

Totemism in primitive music, 8-12, 42, 56, 58-59; in Egypt, 257-8; in Mesopotamia, 230-1.

Trefzger, H., 108.

Trend, J. B., 466 n5, 469, 470, 471 n3, 473.

Triangle, 134.

Tricon, A., 159 n4.

Trigōnon, Syrian harp, 252, 280.

Tropos spondeiakos, 324.

Troubadours, Islamic influence on, 474-5.

Trough, Chinese idiophone, 89, 101, 185.

Trumpets, see Horns and Trumpets.

Tsawmann, 103.

Tsueypypng Shan (Kingfisher-Feather-Screen Mountain), 128-9 (Ex. 211).

Tsyr, 113, 114, 125, 128.

Tuba, Roman trumpet, 405-6, 407, 411, 412, 413, 415.

Tūbal b. Lamak, 423.

Tubūl, 449.

Ṭubūl, Islamic drum, 434.

Tucker, A. N., 159 n2.

Tumbak, Persian drum, 426.

'Tuning-fork' (Niasan aerophone), 170.

Ṭuwais, 428, 435.

Tylor, J. J., 267 n2.

Tyrtaeus, 380.

Tzarjiuh, 114-15.

Tzayyuh, Prince Ju, see Ju Tzayyuh.

Ub (Uppu), Mesopotamian kettledrum, 234, 240.

'Ubaidallāh b. Abī Bakr, 439.

'Ūd, Arabic lute, 251, 423, 427, 446, 447, 454, 468.

Udgātar, 202.

Udgītha, 50, 202.

'Ugābh, Hebrew vertical flute, 289, 296.

Ugaritic religious texts, 289.

Unvalla, J. N., 426 n1.

Upadrava, 202.

Upanishad, Brihadāranyaka, 46.

'Uraib, 437.

Uspensky, P., 472.

Utricularis (Ascaules), Roman bagpipe, 408, 414, 418.

Vaisaenen, A. O., 58 n1.

Valerius Maximus, 246.

Valiha, Malagasy tube-zither, 177.

Varro, 380 n3, 402.

Verus, 417.

Vespasian, 417.

Villancico, 469, 470, 475.

Villaneuva, Jaime, 468 n6.

Villoteau, G. A., 440 n9, 450.

Vīnā, Indian chordophone, 181, 207, 221, 223-4.

Vindex, 418.

Viol (Hebrew), 290.

Viol (Islamic), bowed, 445-6, 452, 468; plucked, 446.

Violin, Indian ('toy'), 225.

  • Indian use of European, 225.

Virelai, 470.

Virgilius Cordubensis, 466.

Virolleaud, C., 231 nn6, 8, 232, 243 n10.

'Visiting the Son of Heaven', 125.

de Vitry, Philippe, 330-1.

Vōn, Persian harp, 243, 425.

Wace, A. J. B., 282.

Waddell, L. A., 142 n1.

Wa'di (Wa'd'ai, Wa'deni), Egyptian reed-pipe, 269.

Wagner, P., 318 n4.

Waley, A., 105, 108 n1, 109 n3, 148 n5, 185.

Walker, D., 441 n4.

Wallaschek, R., 6.

Wang Kwang-chi, 130 n1.

Wann, wannaj, Arabic harp, 243, 425.

Ward, W. H., 239 n8.

Wa'yr (Wa'ra', Wa'r), Egyptian recorder, 269.

Page 586

Weber, A., 210.

Weber, W., 268 n7, 414 n1.

Wegner, M., 296 n1, 380 n8.

Weigall, A., 268 n9.

Weil, H., 379 n1.

Welch, A. C., 297 n1.

Wellesz, E. J., 310, 311 n1, 325 n2, 374 n1, 396 n2, 402 n1.

Werckmeister, A., 100.

Werner, E., 302 nn2, 4, 310 nn1, 4, 315 n8, 317 n2, 322 nn1, 2, 324-8 passim, 331 n2, 434 n3, 466 n2.

Westermann, A., 419 n3.

Westermann, D., 33.

Wey Liangfuu, 126.

WHISTLE:

bone (Mesopotamia), 241.

China, whistle-flutes, 89; free-reed (koouchyyntzyy), 186.

Shandong free-reed, in relation to Jew's harp, 185-6.

'Whistle-language' (primitive), 32.

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U., 403 n1.

Wilhelm, A., 419 n2.

Wilkinson, J. G., 255, 260-74 passim.

Wilwāl, 434.

Winnington-Ingram, R. P., 341 n2, 346 n1, 352 nn1, 2, 367 n1, 374, 375 n2, 380 n5.

Wiora, W., 25 n1.

Wirz, P., 47 n4, 54 n2, 57 n4, 58 n3.

Wissowa, G., 416 n4.

Witte, P., 41 n2.

à Wood, Anthony, 466.

Wooden bats, 35.

— bells, 34.

— block (Chinese), 128-9.

— fish (Chinese slit-drum), 134, 185.

Woolley, L., 239 nn4, 6, 7, 241 n14, 243 n3, 244 n13.

Wright, W., 312 n1.

Wugaang Chynpuu, 119.

Wuudih, Emperor, 96.

Xiphilinus, 372 n2.

XYLOPHONES; see also Metallophones:

Annam, 157.

Bali, 171, 173.

Cambodia, 162, 181.

development of bamboo 'blown tube', 193-4.

Java, 167.

in relation to metallophone, 183-4.

Niasan, 170.

primitive, 35, 38.

Siam, 181.

Sumatra, 168.

Yafil, N. E., 456 n3.

Yahyā b. Hudhail, 445.

Yahyā al-Makkī, 429.

Yajur Veda, 200.

Yakṣagâna, 204.

Yamada koto, Japanese zither, 148.

Yamatogoto (Wagon), Japanese zither, 177.

Yamazumi, 149.

Yangchyn, Chinese dulcimer, 93.

Yang Dahjiun, 123.

Yangguān Sān Dié ('Three Repetitions of the Tune: The Yang Pass'), 119, 121 (Exs. 200, 201).

Yang, Inliou, 105 n1, 117 n1.

Yann, 112.

Yātūghān, Chinese psaltery, 432, 446.

Yazīd Ḥaurā, 436.

Yeadyi, 116.

'Yellow Bell', Chinese modal system, 94–100 passim.

Yeu, Chinese scraper, 89, 101, 105, 185.

Yih Guhren ('Remembering a Friend' or 'In memory of a deceased Friend'), 122 (Ex. 204).

Yilii (Rites and Ceremonies), 90, 181.

Yilii Jingjuann Tongjiee Shyyueh Pian (Melodies for twelve songs in the Shyjing), Ju Shii, 109, 117.

Yoh, Chinese cross-flute, 90.

Youtie, H. C., 374 n4.

Yuancheu, 114.

Yuehchyn, Chinese lute, 92, 124.

Yuehfuu, 87, 96.

Yuehfuu Shyji, anthology of poems, 137.

Yunn, 97, 98.

Yūngār, Turkish pandore, 447.

Yūnus al-Kātib, 457.

— 'Zayānib', 438.

Yūsuf-i Andakānī, 432.

Yūsuf Shāh, 431.

Zaggāl, Mesopotamian upper-chested harp, 237, 238, 243.

Zagsal, Mesopotamian harp, epical composition, 235, 236, 237, 238, 242, 244.

Zaida, 470, 471.

Zajal, 470.

Zalzal, Zalzalian theory, 429, 458, 460, 461, 464.

Zamāru, 233.

Zammēru (Ilukaka), 231, 232-3.

Zanbaq, Arabian reed-pipe, 425.

Zansa, African plucked xylophone, 35.

Zarqūn, 429.

Zawā'id, see Fioritura.

Zelẓelīm (Meẓiltayīm), Hebrew cymbals, 296.

Zimmern, H., 292 n1.

Ziryāb, 429, 436, 437, 459.

Page 587

530

INDEX

Zither, Zither-music:

Annam, 158, 159.

Cambodia, 162.

China, 86, 88, 89, 90, 92, 93, 99, 101,

103, 104, 108, 117, 123, 136, 138, 142,

handbooks, Chinese, 137.

India, 181, 207, 221, 223-4.

Japan, 145, 148, 149, 177.

Java, 167.

Korea, 142, 143.

Madagascar, 177.

magic power, 88.

Malaya, 177.

Mongolia, 136.

Niasa, 170.

primitive, 36.

Sumatra, 168.

technique, 111.

Tibet, 138.

de Zoete, Beryl, 176 nn3, 4, 183 n1,

186 n6.

Zumūr, Islamıc shawm, 434.

Zūwwāq, see Fioritura.

Page 588

PRINTED

IN

GREAT

BRITAIN

AT

THE

UNIVERSITY

PRESS

OXFORD

BY

CHARLES

BATEY

PRINTER

TO

THE

UNIVERSITY

Page 589

CATALOGUED

Page 590

CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL LIBRARY,

NEW DELHI

Catalogue No. 780.9/N.O.M.H. -16178.

Author— Wellesz, Egon. Ed.

Title— Ancient and oriental music.

Borrower No. Date of Issue Date u Return

"A book that is shut is but a block"

CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL

GOVT. OF INDIA

Department of Archaeology

NEW DELHI.

LIBRARY

Please help us to keep the book

clean and moving.