Books / Studies In Kalapurnodayam (Thesis) Krishna Rao G.V

34. 212. ,

Page 335

  1. ,

301

தள் சல்சீஸ்கைஸ் கி. 214& 215. K.P., Canto 3, vs.61, 62and 67.

čaryš. (s 1.20 217. K.P., Canto 4, Pr.183 and v.185. 218. Ilnd., Canto 6, pr.187. 219. Ibid., Canto 1, v.149.

e332r819, Quoted by the author of Comparative Aesthetic, G. V. Knshna Rao

Page 336

  2. There is a difference of opinion regarding the pratımukha sandhi. According to Dhananjaya the development must be partly perceptible and partly imperceptible (eeaddxs (oaae „3. Dasarupaka Prakasa 1, s1.11.) But Abhinavagupta does not accept this. According to him the various sandhis represent the differnt states of the seed and the visiblity is the only thing to be presented in the pratimukha. கல ஜய ஸ்ரப்.ுவஸ் sஸ் லக் லவி. கக்கில்

நஜி: (?). வககஸ் ழ :. கயல்ர ஜெயல் ககதுலகி ல்

302 s380 e. 19,3.40.

  1. S.D., Parıccheda 6, Karikas 79 - 80. 225. D.R. mentions sama in the place of tapana and defines it as aratisama S.D. defines that, when one finds no way out, it is acase of tapana. 226. This is defined as sancıntyamanaptı by Dhananjaya, and as knowing the feelings of others by Visvantha. The example given here is in accordance with the latter interpretation. 227. Ibid., Canto 3., v.284. Not included by the Dasarupaka. 228. Ibid., Canto 3., pr.246. This is mentioned as ksipti in the Sahityadarpana. 229. K.P, Canto 3., v.262. The Dasarupaka mentions it as sambhrama. The Sahityadarpana defines it as commotion (3182ex) due to doubt, fear and alarm. Studies in Kalapurnodayam

Page 337

229-a. Dhananjaya defines this quite differently when he says:

What Bharata calls vidrava becomes drava in Dhananjaya's Dasarupaka. Kheda to be found in the Natyasastra and Sahityadarpana is missing in the Dasarupaka and in its place there is vdrava with a different meaning. The exam- ple is cited in accordance with the definition of Bharata.

  1. The Sahityadarpana mentions this as pratisedha while Dhananjaya calls it vicalana and defines it as vikatthama or self-praise. 231. This is mentioned as purvabhāva by the Dasarupaka. 233. S.D., paricchēda, 3, Darika 32. D.r., Ch. 2sls.485. K.A.S., Canto 2, v. 4. K.C., Canto 3, v. 5. 303

மதைப்காசன ழ9க்

Kası Ed. Nātyasāstra, Ch.20 vs.76-79. A different version is to be found in Kâvyamãla edition :-

G V. Knshna Rao