151. LIST OF EARLY ALANKĀRAS 149

LIST OF EARLY ALANKĀRAS 149

जाति and स्वभावोक्तिare treated as synonyms by Dandin (काव्या- दर्श II. 8). बास also appears to have known it (vide कादम्बरी Introductory verse हरन्ति कं ... कथा:। निरन्तरश्लप- घना: सुजातयो महास्रज &c). तुल्ययोगिता found in all, but दरडी adds that it must be स्तुति- निन्दार्थ (II. 330). दीपक defined by all. वृष्टान्त defined by उद्ट alone. निदर्शन or निदशना found in all, उद्भट calling it विदर्शना. निपुस found in भदि X. 74 alone (may be included under उदार according to जय०, while the same verse is मेय: according to मल्लि०). परिवृत्ति found in all, but भामह (III. 41) and भट्टि (acc. to जयमझ़ला) require it to be अर्थान्तरन्यासवती. पर्यायोक्त found in all except वामन. प्रतिवस्तूपमा found in all except भहि; भामह (II. 34) and दएडी regard it as a variety of उपमा. प्रेय: found in all except वामन. भाविक , " " "' It is a प्रबन्धविषयगय acc. to भामह (III. 53-54) and दएडी (II. 364-366).1 यथासंख्य found in all, वामन calling it क्रम and दएडी saying that it is styled संख्यान and क्रम also (II. 273). यमक found in all except उद्ट. रसवत् found in all except वामन. रूपक found in all. लव-same as लेश. Some commentators of काव्यादर्श read लव for लेश (यामुन and श्रुतानुपालिनी do so). लाटानुप्रास defined by उद्ट alone and referred to by भामह (II.8). लेश defined by दएडी alone (II. 265-267). It is the व्याजोकि of मम्मट. दएडी also says that some defined it so as to make it the same as व्याजस्तुति. भामह (II. 86) denies that it is an अलं०. A later आलक्कारिक रुद्ूट defines and illustrates लेश (VII. 100-102). वक्रोक्ति defined as a figure by वामन alone (IV.3.8); referred to by भामह (II. 85) and दगडी (II. 220 and 363) as under- lying all figures.

1. Vide Dr. Raghavan in 'Some concepts' &c on the history of भाविक pp. 117-130.