152. 150 HISTORY OF SANSKRIT POETICS

150 HISTORY OF SANSKRIT POETICS

वार्ता found in भहि alone (acc. to जयमझला on X. 46). भामह (II. 87) alludes to it and so does दएडी (I. 85-86). विष्युधर्मोत्तर III. 14. 11 has it, acc. to one ms; vide Dr. Raghavan in 'Some concepts' & c pp. 97-99 and सर. क. I. 142-143. विभावना found in all. विरोध found in all. विशेषोक्ति found in all but वामन's वि० isdefined differently (in IV. 3.23) and is equal to रूपक. व्यतिरेक found in all. व्याजस्तुति found in all. ग्याजोक्ति defined by वामन alone, which was called मायोकि by others, as he says (IV. 3. 25). शिष्ट found in all, वामन using the word श्लेष. संसृष्टि found in all; दएडी calls it सक्कीं and includes संसृष्टि and सकूर in it; वामन gives it a restricted scope recognising only two varieties उपमारूपक and उत्प्रेक्षावयव; उद्धट distingu- ishes it from सक्कर. सक्कर defined by उद्धट alone (with four varieties). संख्यान same as यथासंख्य acc. to दएडी (II. 273), and भामह II. 80 says it was called संख्यान by मेधावी. समासोक्ति found in all. समाहित found in all, but the समाहित of दएडी is different from उ्धट's and is the समाधि of later writers; वामन's समाहित is quite different from both. The verse in af that is समाहित according to जय० is स्त्रभावोक्ति according to मल्लि०. ससन्देह found in all except दएडी who includes is under उपमा calling it संशयोपमा; वामन uses the form सन्देह. सहोक्ति found in all. सूक्ष्म defined by दएडी alone (II. 260); भामह denies that it is an भलं०. 1स्वभावोक्ति defined by दएडी, उ्रट and भामह (II. 93) alone, the latter admitting it according to others and exemplify- ing it also (in II. 94) as भाक्रोशन्नाह्मयन्नन्यानाधावन्मएडलर्नुंदन्। गा वारयति दएडेन गोप: सस्यावतारिणी: ॥. It appears that भामह as a concession to his predecessors acceded to the view that

1. Vide Dr. Raghavan on 'the history of स्वभावोकि' in Indian Culture, vol. V. for 1938 pp.147-166 and in 'Some con- cepts &c.' pp. 92-116, (1942). In the latter he elaborates his former paper.